Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement x17 France
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

« Frenemies & Fraitors: The Truth Behind Hollywood Friendships | Main | Britney Gets Cleaned »

Do Stars Pimp Out Their Babies?

Posted on Thu Mar 27, 2008 05:49 AM PDT

Angelina Jolie babypimps.jpg

The NY Post reported yesterday on the paychecks celebs are receiving for their baby photos -- are Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie's unborn twins worth $10 million? And if so, what the the parents going to do with all that money? A trust fund? Charity?

The Post reports that one magazine editor they spoke with suggested celebs might start deciding to have kids just to collect on the photos they can sell! Now you don't have to sell your baby (hey, it's not China, y'all) to sell out your baby!

Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony got a reported $6 million. AMI's editorial director Bonnie Fuller (whom we met yesterday and is totally nice and not the b*tch the media like to make her out to be) suggests that if that figure is true, then Brangelina's offspring will be with $8 million.

But the Fuller questioned me yesterday -- what will the kids of these celebs think of their parents when they're old enough to know their mom and dad pimped them out? ...



What do YOU think?

Comments (0)

Comments



 

 


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

Posted by: shia

I doubt they will care...and I think Brngelina's are worth way more than Chola and Skelator's spawn



Posted by: amel

Angelina and Brad whore out their kids more than anyone. Not only to magazines, but to gain attention in public. Pax (the name they gave to him because they didnt like his given name) was whored out immediately after being adopted.



Posted by: amel

Angelina and Brad whore out their kids more than anyone. Not only to magazines, but to gain attention in public. Pax (the name they gave to him because they didnt like his given name) was whored out immediately after being adopted.



Posted by: amel

the kids are going to spoiled little brats. they wont care that they were whored out. more money for them to waste in the future.



Posted by: Anonymous

of course they do. they allow themselves to get pimped out by people in the industry, so they in turn end up doing the same with their children.



Posted by: Tired of Lies

.

and what will those children think of unethical sites like this that also make money by publishing the photos of innocent children?

x17 is scum for showing pictures of celebrities children.

First look in the mirror before you start pointing fingers.

x17 = scum.

.



Posted by: Mike

but in few months, this babies will be on the magazines anyway, for free... so why not?



Posted by: Anonymous

if i was a child of star parents, i would be proud of the fact that the money from my baby photo went to help others in need, like hospitals, schools or medical research.



Posted by: Anonymous

do u know that angelina is not the bitch the media make her out to be either!



Posted by: Anonymous

This has nothing to do with babies,,,,,,,,,,HELP I NEED A VACATION,I DONT HAVE A PASS PORT OR THE TIME TO WAIT FOR ONE. SOME TIME IN THE MIDDLE OF APRIL SO IT WILL HAVE TO BE IN U.S. HELP KNOW ANY GOOD PLACES TO VISIT............THANX



Posted by: Anonymous

Stupid sites make stupid racist comments about international adoption.



Posted by: Jessica

How can you say they're whoring them out when you stalk them until you get a pic of their bump or kids??



Posted by: suzy

If you had the opportunity to make millions showing off your most precious accomplishment in life, I take it you would refuse? Not I. They are the fools to pay that amount of money. I would make my money,and laugh all the way to the bank!



Posted by: Blobalina hearts orphans & blobs


brangelina are the most disgusting media whores! when adoptalina stole the crying viet. kid from the orphanage, she whined for the press to leave her alone. Then the following week the whore and the poor kid are on the front of O.K magazine! Then the flava flav, kid's real mom came out and said her kid was taken from her too!

Word to Adoptalina and other celebutards! maybe you should just support the orphanage and help the family stay together, so that the kid knows where it came from! and btw! do it without calling CNN!

And hopefully the public stops buying the magazines that allow the celebutards to pimp out their kids for millions!

nuff said-



Posted by: Anonymous

I think celebs who are not chased by the paparazzi and or in the tabloids week after week do NOT need to sell the pix because they won't be harassed about it. Look at how Tomkat tried to hide suri and everybody went crazy with the speculations.

brad and Angelina are too famous ... they will have to release pix of the twins to get keep the papz and tabs off their backs.



Posted by: Brangelina loooooves the paps!


Bitch puhaleeeeze! brangelina wouldn't exist anymore without the paps. media & especially the blogs & the internet!

When you see pics. of brangelina, do you see the seventeen nannies? of course not! it's not good PR! Get your head out of your ass! brangelina are not famous for their acting abilities!



Posted by: Anonymous

It was so obvious in Lopez's pictures that it was all about her and having her pics taken. She doesn't even look at her babies, she is too busy posing.

In one pic she looks like she is going to drop the baby as her attention is more focused on herself and holding the baby is no different then a purse in her hands.

I pity those kids.



Posted by: Kaly

There are more disscussions about this topic on the forum page of the tall dating site--Tallkiss.com, where many tall models and tall men hooking up.



Posted by: jks

It's wrong to pimp your kids out no matter why you are doing it. They all
have enough to give to charity without
doing that. Until the public quit buying
them they will keep on doing it. It's
a way to make money and keep themselves
in the public's eye. In Brad and Angelina's case we see it a couple times
a year. Lots of stars don't and I really
respect them for it.



Posted by: Lita

The diffrence with Angelina and Brad is they give there money to charity. What the others do with the money who knows?



Posted by: LosCabos

Charity is NOT an excuse anymore. Honestly i see this more like a battle of egos. Tom and Katie didn't charge anything for Suri on Vanity Fair. So it's NOT necessary to sell your kid out to "get the paps away". As if.

They HAVE THE MONEY to give to charity already so the "exclusives" are not an excuse. To me, again, it's a battle of egos.

Like...

my kid is worth more than yours haha. and so on. It's pathetic now.



Posted by: Eve

You guys are all wrong. Angelie and Bratt they will give the money away for charity they always been doing that so we don't have to worry about them. Now j.lo and Skeletor they are both greete with their money and they won't give a penny for charity if they do they just do it for the taxes. i love Angelie and Brat they are very special parents and giving person.



Posted by: Eve

You guys are all wrong. Angelie and Bratt they will give the money away for charity they always been doing that so we don't have to worry about them. Now j.lo and Skeletor they are both greete with their money and they won't give a penny for charity if they do they just do it for the taxes . I love Angelie and Brat they are very special parents and giving person.



Posted by: Eve

You guys are all wrong. Angelie and Bratt they will give the money away for charity they always been doing that so we don't have to worry about them. Now j.lo and Skeletor they are both greete with their money and they won't give a penny for charity if they do they just do it for the taxes . I love Angelie and Brat they are very special parents and giving person.



Posted by: Anonymous

Bratt? LOL I like that...



Posted by: ccr

I think it's a fine idea for celebs to get money from their baby's pics - but only if the money goes to charity.



Posted by: Jennifer Lopez & Marc Anthony

Yeah! Money should go to charity. J-Lo is a greedy bitch, and so is Mark.



Posted by: patti

Sad thing is though, the money Brangelina promised to pay out to charity was never received. These dumb ass celebs who cry about the paps and their lack of privacy, need to at least protect their children. They can't have it both ways...here take my kids pic for 10 million, but then don't take any more pics....if you want privacy, then be private!!



Posted by: Anonymous

The difference is some do their charity in private the way it should be and others in front of the cameras like the brangeloons.



Advertisement
Gwen Stefani Hits The Beach With Her Boys
Advertisement
Kristen Stewart In Paris
Advertisement
Advertisement
Josh Hutcherson Buys Heath Ledger's Former Hollywood Treehouse For $2.5 Million
We Want Your Tips
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Celebrity Tweets
Advertisement
Celebrity Street Style
Advertisement
Like us on Facebook!
Advertisement
X17 Poll

What went wrong on The X Factor today with Britney Spears?

Britney definitely had another meltdown. This is proof she's not ready to step back into the spotlight!
I think Britney may have overreacted to a bad audition, but it will be entertaining to watch later!
I think Simon Cowell planned this all along. Brit probably even rehearsed it!
  • Vote
  • View Results
X17 on Twitter
Advertisement
Which actress looks best in her sexy red dress?
Scherzinger Kidman
VOTEVIEW RESULTS
Advertisement
Advertisement
X17 Exclusives