Brit Plays Peek A Boo With Louis Vuitton Bags

Recap : Britney Spears was Great at the VMAs , even though the host russel brand tried to ruin the event with his hate filled anger speech.

Yes Her throne as the tabloid queen

Britney Looks beautiful!! im glad shes working hard and spending more time with her kids now!!!..

my twat smells like old relish, pigs feet and oameal thats mixed in with diarea..

inneed to queef out some air and get back to douching..

LIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEKKK OH MY GOD... She actually washed her hair (thanks to professionals at the photo shoot) she should hire them every day so she doesn't look like a grease monkey!!!

why would they do a photo shoot with roots like that? otherwise she looks super.

Britney is looking incredible, but she's still wearing those same shoes. They must smell like salt and vinegar by now. I guess one doesn't transform themselves totally overnight.

Obama's $845 billion U.N. plan forwarded to U.S. Senate floor
'Global Poverty Act' to cost each citizen $2,500 or more

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: July 25, 2008
12:30 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily


The U.S. Senate soon could debate whether you, your spouse and each of your children – as well as your in-laws, parents, grandparents, neighbors and everyone else in America – each will spend $2,500 or more to reduce poverty around the world.

The plan sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is estimated to cost the U.S. some $845 billion over the coming few years in an effort to raise the standard of living around the globe.


Barack Obama

S.2433 already has been approved in one form by the U.S. House of Representatives and now has been placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for pending debate.

WND previously reported the proposal demands the president develop "and implement" a policy to "cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief" and other programs.

Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media has published a critique asserting that while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels of U.S. foreign aid spending "subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

(Story continues below)




He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years, he said, would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."

The plan passed the House in 2007 "because most members didn't realize what was in it," Kincaid reported. "Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require."

A recent statement from Obama's office noted the support offered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.

"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere," he continued.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION 2008
Obama's $845 billion U.N. plan forwarded to U.S. Senate floor
'Global Poverty Act' to cost each citizen $2,500 or more

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: July 25, 2008
12:30 am Eastern


By Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily


The U.S. Senate soon could debate whether you, your spouse and each of your children – as well as your in-laws, parents, grandparents, neighbors and everyone else in America – each will spend $2,500 or more to reduce poverty around the world.

The plan sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is estimated to cost the U.S. some $845 billion over the coming few years in an effort to raise the standard of living around the globe.


Barack Obama

S.2433 already has been approved in one form by the U.S. House of Representatives and now has been placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for pending debate.

WND previously reported the proposal demands the president develop "and implement" a policy to "cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief" and other programs.

Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media has published a critique asserting that while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels of U.S. foreign aid spending "subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

(Story continues below)




He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years, he said, would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."

The plan passed the House in 2007 "because most members didn't realize what was in it," Kincaid reported. "Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require."

A recent statement from Obama's office noted the support offered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.

"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere," he continued.

Another critic, however, has been commentator Glenn Beck, whose YouTube video critique can be seen here:



"Not one dime would go to fixing America," the commentary said.

Obama has continued to lobby for such massive expenditures on his campaign stops. During an address as recently as last week, he said, "I'll double our foreign assistance to $50 billion by 2012, and use it to support a stable future in failing states, and sustainable growth in Africa; to halve global poverty and to roll back disease."

Beck and Kincaid pointed out that the plan not only commits the U.S. to the anti-poverty spending proposal, it also adopts for the U.S. the United Nations Millennium Development Goal, which includes a variety of treaties and protocols advocated by the U.N.

Objections have remained strong. Duane Lester, writing at the All American blogger, warned that the U.S. has yet to be able to win its own war on poverty.

"On January 8, 1964, President Lyndon Johnson declared "all-out war on human poverty and unemployment in these United States." This "all-out war" would last through the presidencies of Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, H.W. Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush. We have spent billions of dollars fighting this war, and what have we achieved?"

He continued, "Very little. In 1964, there were 36 million Americans living in poverty, or about 19 percent of the population. In the 40 years between 1964 and 2004: ... poverty never measured less than 11 percent of the population. In 1983, under President Reagan, poverty registered 15.2 percent; in 1993, at the beginning of Bill Clinton's presidency, poverty was measured at 13.7 percent of the population. In 2004, under George W. Bush, a president often accused by the political Left as not caring about the poor, the poverty rate declined to 12.7 percent. Still, some 37 million Americans remain poor."

Despite that performance, "Obama is ready to take the fight global," said Lester.

"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child," he wrote.

Tom DeWeese at NewsWithViews said the plan "is very telling" about what Obama would do as president.

DeWeese, president of the American Policy Center, warned the over-arching plan includes the ideals of consolidating all international agencies under the U.N., regulation by the U.N. of all corporate environmental issues, license fees charged by the U.N. to use air, water and natural resources, a restructuring that would give hand-picked non-governmental organizations huge influence, authorize a standing U.N. army and require registration of all arms.

Why not just save valuable time and just put a bag OVER her head?

Amen.

Ugly slut, she has aged so much.

She look so happy good to see that winning 3 pity award brought such happiness to her life becasue that is what life is about.

man...you 6:34pm took the words off my keyboard!

man...you 6:34pm took the words off my keyboard!

5:34 lmao

Brit named the Moonmen - Sean, Jayden and London. Kev got custody of two and the other ones missing.

some people don't like it when your life is good!she don't need you to tell her shes BEAUTIFUL!xoxo

HAS-BEEN! Go back to the backwaters of Louisiana where you belong. LA is too much for a no-talent mental case.

britney for president...

Sexy!

GORGEOUS!

It must be boiling the inner side of the HATERS! Good and positive things are never on their mind. There must be mental problems to deal with them. Lucky Brit she found the cure but what about to those who cannot??? Sad for you all HATERS!

i just think it's funny how some people hate on her, but yet they take the time to know sooo much about her...like, the name of her dog, london. i would not have even remembered that kinda thing on my own had 6:59 not just mentioned it. wow.

Damn are the haters obsessed or what? Britney has them eating out of her palm with all the good press she's been getting. The negitivity is just a way for the loser-haters to cope with the fact they'll never be as rich, famous, or sucessfull as she has been, and WILL BE AGAIN. There lives must suck so bad if they can't be happy for someone who is getting their life together.

Honestly, Britney has been looking so good lately that i can't say my usual, "she looks good again". She's been looking amazing for weeks now. I'm really happy how she has turned her life around.

Outfit + Hair = great.

She's so pretty.

Brit looks great. I'm glad she is doing good.

she's a double bagger

shes gorgeous!
Britney the queen of the world!
love her.

2nd pic
right side = before head saving
left side = after head shaving
lmfao