« "Hello, I'm Fabulous!" | Main | Just Another Day On Robertson... »
X17 Face Off - Lindsay Vs. Hayden!
Posted on Fri Jan 16, 2009 06:50 AM PDT

In light of Katie Holmes and Victoria Beckham's recent designer endorsements, we've found two new babes and a new designer bag to compare!
First there's Lindsay Lohan in a Dooney & Bourke ad waaaaay back in 2004. Ya know, the year Mean Girls came out? Check out how different the redhead looked back then!
And now we have Hayden Panettiere as the current spokesperson for the line:

First of all, the bags have certainly improvedchanged over the years!
But who looks better? After all, these are both actresses... not models.
I like LiLo more, but Hayden rocks her ad the best!
Hayden Panettiere On Having Sex With Her Much Taller Man: "Where There's A Will There's A Way!" - Apr 12, 2011
Hayden Wears Short Shorts! - Apr 05, 2011
Scream 4 Star Hayden Panettiere Arrives Back In LA - Mar 22, 2011
Hayden Panettiere Stumbles Out Of A Pre-Oscar Party - Feb 24, 2011
Hayden Panettiere: Dog's Best Friend - Feb 23, 2011




























Comments
Linds!
are you kidding me? a junkie scumbag homo vs a sweet pussy. PLEASE !!!!!!!!
Lindsay looks much better and the purses look appropriate for her age
At 7:04... Listen to yourself! Disgusting, talk about a scumbag!!
Are they using different photographers for the shoots? They obviously are. Hayden's ad appears to look better, that's partly down to lighting, framing of the image, the set/prop/bkground etc.. Both versions are equally horrible. Hayden's is glossy and plastic looking. Lindsay's is earthier, but bland. The lighting is crap, her skin looks darker than it would've been, giving her that corpsy, sickly skintone, whereas Hayden is clearly overdosing on lighting - talk about a plastic barbie doll glow. Fire the photographers.
Lindsay for sure.
Hayden. At least she's clean for now.
LINDSAY for sure!!
Lind is the BEST
hahaha hayden?
that short stumpy chub troll would never get a modelling job if it wasnt for the fact that she was an actress. Lindsay on the other hand, has the actual structure that a model should have. no comparison.
hayden who????
bitch is short and manly looking.
Hmm Hayden is hot, for me is Lindsay:-)
Lindsay looks so much better!
def. Linds! FAR BETTER than Hayden
Decisions, decisions, decisions...
Nay jus kiddn, Red of course.
Linds is the best always, sure is Linds.
I think both are perfectly suited for selling the bag they have. Lindsay is cute and fun, and Hayden is a bit more classy and glamorous.
HAYDEN by far! Lindsay is trash.
hayden is waayy too short to be modeling in those pics and any other as is very evident so i would say no, lindz for back int he day it was ok, for now no her image has changed too much, they should use models, tall thin and elegant
thats it!
linds forever she is walking hotttt
The bags have not "improved" or "changed". This particular red bag was designed by Hayden (thus the "HP" tag attached to the bag). It retailed for about $500 last year.
both suck dick
both suck dick
LINDSAY......ALL THE WAY!!!!
re: both suck dick
As a matter of fact, one of them DOESN'T suck dick (at least for the time being). Well, unless SaMAN wears a strap-on... LOL.
I vote for the go-fer outta sight outta mind.
Lindsay!!
Hayden Planetarium rules!
Linds!
Hayden by far!!
linds so hot and sexy
Hayden , she is the best!
must be a string hanging that big red bag up.. cause it aint gonna sit like that when yer leaning over!
hayden is way better, so what if she's short she's wayyyyyy hotter
lindsey looks much more age appropriate the way hayden is bending over there just says slutty to me
they both look hot
hayden looks like she is pursuing for some dick in this pose, and Linds gives the sharp light for the advertisement. GO LINDSAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;**
hayden looks like she is pursuing for some dick in this pose, and Linds gives the sharp light for the advertisement. GO LINDSAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ;**
I'd tap both of thsoe sweet ass's, both are very sexy. Lindsay is getting damn shinny. I'd rather eat some meat than bang some bones! bones