« Clint's An OG, Not An OB | Main | Why Is Britney Crying??? »
Kiefer's Allure ...
Posted on Sat Jun 21, 2008 09:00 AM PDT

What IS the allure of Kiefer Sutherland??? I've never figured it out ... even when he was supposedly "hot" circa Flatliners (if you're old enough to remember that movie), I just never got it. I mean, is he cute?
Anyway, apparently Allure mag style editor Siobhan Bonnouvrier thanks so. And frankly, she "ups" his cute factor, so why not!

Are these two a good match? Will they last?
Links:
Kiefer Sutherland
SEE MORE:
Kiefer Sutherland May Be Moving To Dallas - Oct 04, 2010
X17 XCLUSIVE - Keifer Sutherland Stumbles Out Of Madeo At 1am! - Nov 02, 2009
X17 XCLUSIVE - Kiefer's Back On The Booze, Leaves El Bar At 3AM! - Sep 11, 2009
Sutherland Celebrates Avoiding Assault Charges! - May 25, 2009
Brooke? Brooke Who? - May 13, 2009
Kiefer Sutherland May Be Moving To Dallas - Oct 04, 2010
X17 XCLUSIVE - Keifer Sutherland Stumbles Out Of Madeo At 1am! - Nov 02, 2009
X17 XCLUSIVE - Kiefer's Back On The Booze, Leaves El Bar At 3AM! - Sep 11, 2009
Sutherland Celebrates Avoiding Assault Charges! - May 25, 2009
Brooke? Brooke Who? - May 13, 2009














Comments
Here's a new concept - maybe it isn't just looks. He probably makes a girl feel like a million dollars and is great in bed.
He has a great voice.
@9:54 AM, yes that's true, he has a marvellous voice.
But he is not attractif and in a certain way I like that even more than what all those supermen-alike weirdo's show of themselves. He's a great actor, and that counts.
"She?" ups his cute factor? ..~crickets~.. Really?
His ALLURE is one of the few Manly men left, not Effeminate looking boys all over tv and movies. Women like real men not girlie looking men.
It's VIRILITY baby..........yeah
"Will they last?" - Of course not - he's too freakin' hot for her!!
he's H-O-T and he's got a super sexy voice......nuff said!
HE'S HOT HOT HOT HOT HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dear Blog Writer, that you don't think he's cute just goes to show how different perceptions make the world go 'round. It's cool that you don't... but, to many a woman (and, for that matter, man), including me, good god, YES, he's cute. Cute, hot, sexy, utterly edible in every way!!! You name it! I think she's gorgeous too and that they're gorgeous together. Will they last? Who knows. Time will tell. If they make one another happy (and who knows but, without knowing, I'm just thinking positive thoughts for them), I wish them nothing but the best!
Kiefer is so sexy! He's one of the greatest actors around and he's got rugged good looks that is often missing in the industry today. His voice is to die for! Siobhan? Yeah, she's okay, but she has not been able to put that spark back into Kiefer's eyes. His dog, Jayhay has gotten Kiefer to smile more genuinely than Siobhan has! Wish he would relax and rediscover his passion for life. Miss the old Kiefer!
Could it be that you're missing the publicly drunk Kiefer? Because, while I respect that you're clearly not seeing something there that you are missing, I'm just not seeing this "loss of spark" in him at all. He doesn't look bored or unhappy or unrelaxed or spark-less at all to me. What I see when I look at him right now is what I've seen in the past when he's sober and seems to be in a good place. (In general, that is... whether or not it has to do with a woman.)
It's true that we haven't seen a lot of those old familiar photos with him looking three sheets to the wind and he definitely does get a different look on his face and in his eyes when he's in that state. But, to me, not seeing that isn't a bad thing. For one thing, though I know he's always loved to party, I never necessarily believed that he was always deep-down happy at those times. I don't know if he is now either. I just don't see (as I get that you do) that he looks unhappy lately.
We TOTALLY agree about how sexy he is and what a brilliant actor he is, though! :)
rowdy kiefer lover...i think your dead on...she his type physiclly, and i know they are suppose to be madly in love, but all their photos look staged ...almost forced...except one from last august...i think he puttin on show...i miss old crazy kiefer who was always real...and free, he looks sober, healthy biut not crazy about the lady...who knows...
she is after his money! i know people who know her from her days at chanel when she was a model. she always looked for men who were loaded and easy targets...then gets them to marry her quickly. thats what she did with david...and i think poor sweet kiefer is her next target. i hope he wises up and gets a pre nup...bet she will pull a heather mills. im not a nay sayer, or a hater..its what i have been told by very reliable sources in her industry.
Interesting input, Wendy - thanks. The only thing I'd say, from where I sit - not knowing the people you're talking about - is that, while I take your word that you're not being a naysayer or a hater, I don't know whether or not those people are. What you're relating is hearsay and while of course it may be true, it also (depending on the motives of its source(s)) may not be.
You say that she looks for "men who are loaded and easy targets and then gets them to marry her quickly", which makes me curious... has she been married more than once before? I hadn't heard/read that... which doesn't mean it isn't true, of course! But that would be interesting additional information, if so.
she was engaged to a model for chanel. and they had already picked a date, got ring...and such..left him after 8 months of living together when she switch to david agency, and made moves on him...wound up very quickly on his arm and soon was married like in 8 or 9 months...my sources are not big kiefer fans...or non kiefer fans.They have no reason to lie. They just knew her..one worked with her...one was a model at david agency...im not repeatin all the seedy details because you are right it is hearsay...but i think its a very reliable source..i am a kiefer fan, and dont want to think of him ..like an easy target, i hope if this is true...that he can see it...thats all. I do think its true.maybe she will prove me wrong.
Christy, just curious, are you a friend of hers. If not, she should hire you for PR. This woman seems to have married David for his wealth and position and then when she achieved what she wanted which was a nice position at Allure she dumps David and moves onto Kiefer.
Looks like she moved in on Kiefer in July while she was still married to David; finalized her divorce while Kiefer was in jail and was ready to make her move, free as a bird, when he got out.
Now they are talking marriage after only what a few months. Why the rush for her to marry him? Hmmmmm, inquiring minds want to know.
I wish someone would explain this to me. Kiefer has already been divorced twice and as a fan of his I would just like to see him with a nice woman.
I hope I am wrong about Siobhan because if I am not this marriage will not last either.
by the way, im not wendy...i forgot to post my name. so i dont know her story or rumors. my post was above linda
you gals need to chill...maybe it will be a long engagement. like a few years.
Thanks for the additional info, Jill.
All info is great to have to try to put together the pieces of something from afar. Though I understand what you're saying about these contacts not being Kiefer fans, without knowing anything else about them, I still don't believe that it's possible (for me, from afar) to make a call as to their potential motivation regarding or relationship to Siobhan.
I completely acknowledge that they might be 100% correct about her. I also know, from experience in life, that people's judgement about someone else's motivation can be colored by all kinds of things. Human beings - and the reactions of other human beings to/about them - are complicated things! :)
Siobhan certainly may have all kinds of issues but, if she does, she won't be the only person in a relationship between her and Kiefer with issues. ;) If she's had a complicated past with men... well, Kiefer's had a complicated past with women too. Maybe their relationship, whatever it may be, is a big ol' disaster happening - or waiting to happen. But, then again, maybe it's not. Maybe, possibly, who knows this will be the time they both get it right. Or not. I just think that Kiefer deserves a chance to be happy whatever mistakes he's made in the past... and, who knows, maybe that's where she's at in her life too. Or not. :) Though of course it's possible that she's not good for him, I don't feel like I, personally, have enough information to make that call.
What I can say for sure (speaking just for myself) is that, while I completely get that others are seeing this, I don't at all see that he seems unhappy or bored or lacking in spark in her presence.
So, like most if not all of us, I'm just in watching from afar and hoping for the best for him. I just don't feel like I have enough info, from afar, to make a call about whether or not she's good for him or whether they're good for one another/together... so I'm just thinking positive thoughts and hoping for the best. I understand that others do feel that they have enough information to have made a decision about her/them and it's fine by me to agree to disagree on that. :)
Oops, I typed too much! :D Here's what got cut off...
So, like most if not all of us, I'm just watching from afar and hoping for the best for him. I just don't feel like I have enough info, from afar, to make a call about whether or not they're good for one another/together... so I'm just thinking positive thoughts and hoping for the best. I understand that others do feel that they have enough information to have made a decision about her/them and it's fine by me to agree to disagree on that. :)
Hi Linda. (If you haven't figured out, which you probably have, I'm dillon... just posting under my own name rather than a board id here... :))..
Nah, I don't know Siobhan from a hole in the wall. :D Actually, that's the whole point of my entire position on this subject. I don't know her and, not knowing her, I don't know whether I like her or don't like her or what I think about her at all... and, in the absence of that knowledge, I'm just wishing good things for Kiefer. :)
Given not knowing her or knowing anything about her in a way which I can make a personal determination about the source (which isn't to say that I don't believe Wendy or Jill... only that I don't know them... or the people who gave them this information), I don't feel that I can know: why she married her first husband or why she divorced him; how/why her and Kiefer's relationship developed; how good/bad - they may be for one another.
I certainly don't believe that they're talking marriage simply because of that single, very poorly sourced "news" tidbit that got picked up by all kinds of internet sources. If they are, imo, we out here in fandom don't know it.
If they do get married (and who knows?!), like you, I just hope it works out well. :)
Oops, that post to Linda was from me, Christy... forgot to enter my name... d'oh! :D
LOL, dillon. I actually figured it out after I saw your post to Jill which of course answered my question about you knowing Siobhan. I recognized the writings, LOL.
Here's hoping Kiefer is making the right decisions for himself this time.
See you on the other boards my friend!!
Kiefer has always been hot and always will be. He's classy and even under stress, he served his time with dignity and responsibility. I wish him nothing but good times.
What!!!! No Video!!!
Missing me some HOT, HOT Kiefer jeans in motion.
Come on X17 - where's the clip?
He use to be good looking, but too much smoking has ruined his look IMO. She has that "hamster hair " look that so many New Yorkers seem to love. They are a good couple.
i do think Kiefer is very hot in a (HA HA) "Little Lost Boy" kind of way. i also think Kiefer & Siobhan look cool together and they must have a good, secure relationship goin by the fact that she was comfortable out with him wearing shoes that make her a half a head taller. look at the diff in the height of their shoulders in the first pic.
one thing i groaned to hear about was another article where they said he was drinking again in public for what i think is the first time since he went to jail, looks like the sentence and the therapy didnt do much good. i'd be scared if i were him, thinkin about what it takes for most alchoholics to bottom out, just what it'll mean for him. he seems like a nice guy, i'd hate for him to end up in prison if he drives drunk again, especialy if he hurts of kills somebody like hulk hogan' son.
Wish he could see this and know that there are folks out there who want to see him cut the drinking and get himself togethr.
C'mon guys, they don't have a "relationship" at all! It's all staged, just a PR-thing, Kiefer doesn't show any PDA at all, he never stopped drinking and is still after other hot chicks! Read Defamer, May 23th!
C'mon guys, they don't have a "relationship" at all! It's all staged, just a PR-thing, Kiefer doesn't show any PDA at all, he never stopped drinking and is still after other hot chicks! Read Defamer, May 23th!
What is in Defamer on May 23?
Nothing probably... of course Nancy is Kiefer's best friend and has all the real info. SCHNORT. She wnt to S. Africa to be with him for a while, that's where he was rported drinking again :( in a hotel there with her at dinner. Of course, since Nancy knows all this stuff about him, maybe she could clear all that up, too. He's been photographed w/ her since last AUGUST. DUH... just more since he got out of jail. Sounds kind long for a PR stunt, don'tcha think, everyone? This isn't to make him seem more stable after getting out and if Nan were a fan who kept track of him or had some real insight, she's know that. Oh well. Time to give up being psychic about Kiefer.
Wishin' him that bestt.
Lol - someone got hit on his/her nerves...
I saw this Defamer-sighting, too. Search under Kiefer Sutherland and then "even jackie warner thinks sky sport is overpriced" and you can read the story. Don't know if it's true and there's a mix-up at the date though...
Defamer ain't exactly the new york times and gossip rags that can't get their dates right are about as useful as a broken clock if theyre pretending to keep tabs on celebs for you. Sib's been around for a while, just KS knows how to keep things quiet when he wants.
It's kinda embarrassing to show how jealous you are of a chick you don't know and a guy who wouldn't be interested. :)
Hey - who says he wouldn't be interested?? He just don't know me yet - LOL!!!
Or even better: maybe he was already interested and I dumped him?? How would you know????
I was talking about Nancy the Kiefer Prophet, not you, unless you are Nancy.
In any case, Sib's been around longer than it being for some publicity thing.
That Defamer sighting was 2-3 years old and there was some confusion as to how the story got mixed in with the current stories. I've heard the story before and you'll notice that the date posted is wrong too.
As much as I wish that Kiefer would stop drinking, I doubt that will ever happen. Yes, he was spotted having a drink with dinner in South Africa, but at least we haven't heard stories of him binge drinking in bars like we used to hear on a regular basis. I guess that's progress.
As far as Siobhan goes, no one here really knows her so who knows what's really going on there. I'm not saying those stories/rumours are true or aren't true, but we have to remember that females can be a catty bunch, if they don't like another girl, they will get nasty and say things behind their back whether it's true or not. We've all seen it.
And I've never understood why fans are always saying Kiefer is orchestrating a PR stunt. They said that when he was dating Tricia too. How would this be a PR stunt? It's not like he has anything to gain by being seen with her. I mean outside of the fashion world, she really is a "nobody", it's not like he's dating Angelina Jolie or anything. And from what we've seen and heard from KS over the past 20 years, he seems to do his own thing and could care less about what other people thought of him which makes this PR stunt talk even more perplexing.
I'm glad this is an old story - I would hate to see Kiefer doing still things like that... It would be so good he could stop drinking (what he appearently didn't :-( ), I don't want him to get in any further troubles and want him to live veeeeeery long!!!!
That Defamer sighting was 2-3 years old and there was some confusion as to how the story got mixed in with the current stories. I've heard the story before and you'll notice that the date posted is wrong too.<<<
Hi, I agree with your entire post!
I think they look great together. She looks like she could just put her arm out and tuck him right underneath of it.
Unfortunately his history, as well as others tells us that for binge drinkers "just having a drink" will lead to binging eventually. The old saying that "100 drinks are not enough and 1 is too many " is true.
Unfortunately his history, as well as others tells us that for binge drinkers "just having a drink" will lead to binging eventually. The old saying that "100 drinks are not enough and 1 is too many " is true.
yeah, if he's telling himself and evryone else that he can contol it and whatever, the person he's fooling is himself. of cours, this all fits in with the denial aspect of the drinking too much. Realy thought his dad had tlked some sense into him. This is the fist time i've heard of him drinking after getting out but since it was so out in the open, you'd have to figure that it's something he's not been inhibited from doing at all. its hard to watch somebody so talentd trash themselves but it's a disease and ya gotta' love him in spite of it if youre in his life and it looks like Sib might and if your a fan, theres nothing wrong with still liking him and wishing him well. I feel bad for him but I still like him.
imo, Kiefer is an alcoholic. (I don't say that as a negative judgement of him, but simply as an observation based on what I can observe from afar/have learned from several years of gathering *lots* of available information about the guy.)
Given that belief, I too was hoping that he wasn't drinking now. That said, I'm not surprised to hear that he is. We have no idea whether or not he believes that he's an alcoholic (and, if he doesn't, it doesn't matter what anyone else thinks) or ever made any pledge to quit drinking. It's also possible that he's somewhat come to that conclusion (he's certainly talked in the past about alcohol being a problem for him), but still believes that he can control it. There certainly have been a lack of "Kiefer out & about smashed" stories since he got out of jail.
If he thinks that he can "drink a little", i think that he's wrong... but it doesn't matter what I (or anyone else) thinks unless/until he decides that for himself.
As for "talking sense into him", that's not, in my understanding or my experience (my husband is a currently sober alcoholic), how it works. Would that it did. :)
So, we'll see... and I'm nothing but wishing him well too!
How about we just wish them both the best and hope that everything works out the way it's meant to be. I am a fan of Kiefer's and think that the man is no dummy and can handled his life.
As someone who is a Kiefer fan, I too want the best for the man. If I believed that he was truly madly in love with this woman I would feel better about this relationship, but I just don't see the same spark he's had with other women. Obviously, fans have become divided into two camps on this issue and debate has become rampant. Just look at sites like www.kiefergr8.blogspot.com and wwwelizabethsplace.blogspot.com featuring pics of Sib's first wedding as proof of that. Like others before me, I do wish him the best.
Well, Cat, you and all the others are all entitled to your dumb-because-they're-based-on-nothing opinion of them - and I hope for real that theyre happy. you and the ones running blogs that are judging them as fake or doomed have no relationship with KS but gathering pics and maybe being jealous.
i'm guessing the reason the "debate" is rampant is because some people know they dont know and regard Kiefer and Sib as grown ups who can do what they want *and* *some* people dont get that they dont know.
Sib's been around for almost a year, which means she was there through all the other stuff tht went on for him that was bad recently and didn't disappear. maybe factor in that, hmph? and that she knows he's got a very clear alcohol problem, had to before they got together since its public news, and has been with him through the worst bit of it so far in his life. She's got her own carrer and money; she wouldn't need his and instead of picking someone in LA, where he lives, Kief's with her and they have to work to be together. She's been all around the world with him or went on her own to him, too, and travel, even for the rich is a pain these days. give her a little credit. Does all tht fit with them not meaning something to one another? maybe what youre seeing is a grown up relationship without all the carrying on K did in the past. i sure dont miss that.
and... someone's old wedding pics don't mean squat. there are pics from K's weddings too.
Bottom line; i don't think either of them are worried about what a bunch of people who don't know them think and thank god for that...
She wouldn't give him a first glance if he didn't have money. End of story.
These two are a great match. Both are motivated by money , "stuff" and apparently fashion. Not really intellectual types their next purchase, plane ride or restaurant meal.
These two are a great match. Both are motivated by money , "stuff" and apparently fashion. Not really intellectual types. Their world consists of the next purchase, plane ride or restaurant meal.
She wouldn't give him a first glance if he didn't have money. End of story.<<<
Prove it to us. your brave anonymous opinion is nothing. she's got plenty of her own. are you saying that because you think KS is unattractive or that Sib's a gold digger? if so... what's the proff or are you jealous of one of them or both?
it's "thinks so" not "thanks so"....dumb-ass!
ok, did you forget to put your name, cos i sure didn't!
I can't believe you used the childish word dumb!
Oh, well. Not the reason i'm here!
Let me start off by saying,Jealous, picture gatherer, blogger, is so not me!
Can't be jealous of someone you don't know and probably never will! I have enjoyed watching his movies for years and don't give a blast who he is
dating, sleeping with or marrying! I just enjoy posting pics of him,if that is that a crime, then call the cops, i'm not gonna stop!
I have been a fan of his for a long time and enjoy 24 a lot! Gonna miss it when him, when Jacks gone!
OK, the reason i'm here!
In My Opinion, and speaking from experience, when we were first dating,my
guy and me were very much into PDA! we enjoyed each others company and so was Kiefer before he started seeing Sib! Haven't you seen him with, Julia,Kelly, Kathrine and whoever he was with at the time, holding hands, looking into each others eyes,smiling, a lot, and just enjoying being in each others company!Oh and sometimes, he wasn't drunk!!
Not the same with Sib! The latest pics, they are actually conversating, love it, they can talk, but look close, he is not happy, he doesn't smile,he's always looking off somewhere else,and once, we saw them holding hands, if i love someone,i'm gonna walk with him, very close, hold his hand,talk to him,let everyone know he's mine! She smirks at the camera as if to say to us fans,See what i've got and not you, Please,so you've got him, let's see some joy in that fact!
How do you know she has money? Do you know her personally? Probably Not!
You know for a fact she was in SA with him, there was an article stating that when he was drinking in SA(hmm i thought she was helping him with that!),and there was a brunett having dinner with him,presumably, his girlfriend, not with his girlfriend, presumably!
She's been around for almost a year? Wonder if Tricia knew that because in another article, Tricia was with him the night before he checked into jail, and he was supposedly going to propose to her when he got out!OK,He was seen with Sib, in August, was with Tricia in December, was going to ask her(Tricia) to marry him in January and now we're back to Sib!In My Opinion, someone needs to do some math,offically, together since April, and it's now June, of the same year!That is not almost a year!
It's been said that she's changed him, give him some credit, if he didn't want to change, he wouldn't, even with her help! And you don't get over being an alcholic in a few months or weeks,that's a lifetime thing, always labeled a recovering alcholic, speaking from experience,nope, not me, sorry, can't use that against me,but a close friend! You go through depression, rage,fear and dependecy on other things or people, i hope she will be there for him through it all!
Never once said they didn't mean something to one another, but since you brought it up, can you tell us, what they mean to each other,you have no idea, because you don't know them!
And if you do know them, girl give it up, we want details,proveable ones!
Wedding pics, that is not what i was going for, read the article!!They just happen to be with it!And isn't she smiling pretty?!
I hope this a very good relationship that will last throughout eternity and they will both be very happy!
But In My Opinion,not seeing it at the moment, prove me wrong, Sib,make him a happy man!
Yeah, Christy, I saw Siobhan's career on YouTube! What a joke she is. Have you read the fluff articles she has written? Yeah, I know, they're hard to find because there aren't very many of them. I hope Kiefer doesn't start drinking, again, he may go to the fridge and pull out a bottle of her moisturizer and drink it by mistake.
Many fans just want to see Kiefer happy, and, so far, he doesn't look happy at all. Another thing, if Siobhan was dating him last summer, she was still married to David. That makes her a cheat and Kiefer a cad for dating a married woman. Good foundation for a marriage, I daresay.
BTW, who set you up as the Kiefer expert, anyway? Have you had some past relationship with Kiefer? Doubt it.
People are just speculating because no one in the know is talking. Lighten up, girl, and retract your claws before someone gets hurt!
what i've got and you don't!Well, lets see some Joy in that fact!
She's supposed to be "helping him" with his drinking problem, ok,Give the man some credit here, if he didn't want to stop, he wouldn't and no amount of helping would stop him! Sib is there for him, ok, the article read, he was in SA, drinking with a brunett, presumably,his girfriend, presumably, not with his girlfriend!If it was her, great help she was there, huh!
Wedding pics? Did you even grasp what i was getting at? Apparently not!
If they are getting married,I wish for them all the happiness in the world, but In My Opinion, Haven't seen it yet!!
Someone said she was camera shy, Please, she eats it up!!!
by the way, the post before Rowdy is the beginning of mine, and You no name, said she has money,Do you know that for a fact! Probably not!
Rowdy Kiefer Lover, I didn't mention Siobhan's career (I think it was Maven in FL who did) so I'm not sure why you directed that particular comment to me.
As for the rest of your post, I'm just expressing my opinions like you're expressing yours and other people are expressing theirs. We all have a right to do that, even if we don't agree, don't we?
My claws aren't out and I'm not claiming to be a "Kiefer expert" any more than anyone else who's posting her opinions here is claiming to be that.
Like you said, everyone's just speculating... even if we are speculating differently from one another.
I respect your right to feel how you feel and say it even if I disagree with you and hope you'll extend the same respect to me even though you disagree with me.
Ah, okay, I just went back and looked at the post that mentions Siobhan's career. I thought it was signed by Maven in FL, but it's not (seems like it was earlier? it's weird because now there's no sig, not even 'anonymous').
Anyway, it wasn't me. I always post with my name and, if I forget my name, I come back and post to say "that was me." I'm not trying to hide what I think... and I wouldn't have used the word "dumb" to describe other people's thoughts/opinions.
Just as an observation, I notice that the "Posted By" line has disappeared in a few posts. I'm almost positive that the one that starts "The Defamer sighting was 2-3 years old..." was signed by "Heather" earlier. Now there's no "Posted By" line there at all... just as happened with the post that's addressed to "Cat" and that definitely talks to/about people in a way that I haven't and wouldn't (though Rowdy Kiefer Lover and Elizabeth both seem to think that I would).
Just for the record. :)
Many humble apologies, Christy! I was wrong about it being you who posted that comment. Please forgive me! I think that all of this speculation about Kiefer is getting to me, as well as others. As a fitting punishment, I had myself declawed! You are so right that we should respect each other. Again, my apologies!
I am glad that we do agree that Kiefer is hot. I think I am just a woman who enjoys the hell-raising, bad boy Kiefer so much more than the Kiefer who is being presented in the media at this time. He just doesn't seem to have his past passion for life. To hear him really laugh and give us that big gorgeous grin would be to die for!
I so agree with you valarie!!
He has a killer, no pun intended,smile!
And his laugh, awesome!!
And, no name,If you don't miss his hall raising, laughing, and would rather see him like this, ok!
Thanks, Valerie... and apology very much accepted! :D
I can't wait to see him on talk shows (maaaaaaaaaaybe for Mirrors... certainly - I hope! - for the prequel movie) and I think that's when we'll see/hear all of that because he'll actually be talking in front of the camera again. There hasn't been a single interview with him since September, which I certainly can understand (has given him a chance to re-enter public life without having to talk about the DUI/jail)... but I miss hearing him/seeing him in that way too. So I definitely understand what you're saying there. :)
(Going to start a new post, because I can't tell how long these can be before they get cutoff.)
Nope Christy, didn't think it was you at all! Didn't know who it was, notice i said, no name?
I was just responding to a comment!
I also can understand that you miss the BadBoyKiefer. I totally agree that there's a glint that he gets in his eye when he's on a roll that's extremely delicious. It's both sweet and devilish... both little boy and all man... so open and vulnerable and sexy all at the same time. *THUD*
But, for me, while I understand missing that (and there's part of me that does too), because I've thought for a long time that he has a serious drinking problem (I posted what I think about that above so won't write it again here), I'm rooting for him to be able to control it. I wish that I believed that he could have a whiskey or two with dinner and stop at that... but, over time, that seems unlikely to me. We'll see.
So, who knows what the future holds for him... and all I know is that, whatever it is, I just wish him contentment. In my observation, his natural (sober) state isn't happy go lucky... but that doesn't mean (I think/hope) that he can't be happy. I just wish him the best because, for all his complications and complexities, he sure seems like someone who deserves it! :)
Elizabeth, my apologies. You did say "no name"! I just made the (wrong) assumption that you thought that was me too. Sorry for the confusion. :)
Thanks, Christy. Yeah, I hope we get do get a live interview soon, too. I sure miss him!
Wow, Elizabeth, I guess both those rambling "psychic Kiefer love interpreter" posts were yours.
Screech much?
ever think that, i dont know, K and S are in a grown up relationship and/or don't want all the nasty / goofy press that comes along with open public displays of affection? maybe that Kiefer had enough of that after all the other feeding the press did off his life and who are now probably hoping for more snce he got out jail and she respects his wishes? OR.... DUHHH... have you considered she's been around a year for a reason. i didn't see you answer any of the comments I made about the fact she's been there for him before and after some rough times.
you dont know and you care too much in a weird way.
She dumped her husband of less than 2 years for Kiefer, even though they had to get married in Morrocco as NYC was not special. I guess her husband wasn't special either. Ugh! He'll be out partying sooner or later and she won't be there to "monitor" him as it looks like she has been doing thus far.
I wonder if he feels obliged to stay with her since her husband divorced her because of their relationship. Ick!
She's all over it when the camera is around.....I guess she couldn't get the publicity she wanted with her ex.
Don't we all love these brave critical and know nothing posts from anonymous, jealous, junior high school hags? If they split up tomorrow, he still doesn't know who you are; he won't be calling you to come get him through life, and the bottom line is you know nothing and wont admit it. ignorance is angry bliss. GROW UP.
Dear Kirsti... when do you graduate and will the popular girls not invite you to their party? prove your accusing question with... like you know... uh with... like facts. GROW UP.
Oh, are you no name,Maven? Kool, Nice to meet ya!
And to answer your comment,sorry i missed it.
Do you have proof she was with there for him, before and after? Nope, just like we really know nothing! None of us! And the press thing, It's his life, wheather he likes it or not! If he's so upset with it, then maybe he should go and rodeo somewhere again so he can't be found again!!
And if she's been there for a year, where was she the night he got busted?
No prob, Christy!
This place is full of confusion!!
Love it!
Apparently "Maven in FL" is the girlfriend's publicist.
Lol! Maybe she's not "Maven in FL" but "Siobhan in NY".....
hey, Elizabeth, since youre psychic, I would have though you didn't need a name.
As to the other junk you asked Sib's been photographed with K since August last year. she's been seen with him publicly more since he was released and, since well, she's got a carrer of her own, maybe they are grown ups who don't need to be together all the time to have a realtionship.
Heres the diff, little girlfriends, you are trashing her and dont know squat but youre own infantile guesses and i'm just pointing out that you don't know. so... if you are the kind of person who trashes people when you don't know them, just because youre obssessed with a guy youll never meet, that says a whole lot about you more than me trashing you for your attitude or those anonymous cowards for theirs. haven't done that growin' up yet, I see. Oh, and when you have, you'll realize what a screech you've been.
Maven - you're priceless! You give me the laugh of my life!!
Maven, What grsde are you in?
Your ranting is so silly! Screech? sheesh, give me a break!
I would love to know how well you know Sib!
THis is for our opinions and i'm not changing mine because you are a very hyper person that,In my opinion, thinks she knows everything!
If you do, give it up girl!! we're all interested!!
heck i ask you what grade your in and i can't even spell grade!! LOL!
Please stop fighting. A picture speaks a thousand words. As she was walking down the streets of NY was she humming the tune to Pretty Woman in her head, the hooker part, from the waist down of course. Look at the pics of them having lunch on Benny's site. KS is leaving with the silver tray (check) in his hand and she is fighting behind him trying to push his chair in so she can get out of the corner in her killer heels. KS is smiling for the first time, his real smile!!
Man, her feet were probably killing her by the time they walked back to 10th street. The pic showed just how much KS was into her. No RESPECT! What happen to Taxi Service in NY? (laugh) What a show!
I will end by asking whether you think Kiefer is dressing a bit gay lately or is she dressing him gay? I would hate to be watching a gay Jack Bauer when I'm so Straight. What a waste!
Posted by Tishjeans
Tishjeans, I hereby award you the prize for the most ugliness in a single post.
This has been a crazy subject for awhile now. Regardless of how they look in pics, pics can certainly be deceiving, i certainly wish him the very best, if he decides to marry Siobhan. I hope she doesn't take him for a ride, or maybe he should sign a pre-nup before geting married again.I just think he's going to fast with alot of things in his life right now. doing a movie, then 24 trying to get his shit together for the sake of his image. If being around Sib is an image thing for him or her, which I'm getting the feeling it could possibly be this, Maybe he should just live with her for awhile. It takes more than a year of being around someone to really get to know each other. I learned that by going through a divorce. I dated my 2nd husband for 3 1/2 years before marrying him. I learned that from my first mistake (husband). He was finally his real self after 5 years.. I am not trying to tear Kiefer or Siobhan down in any way. I am not a miserable, jealous person.
This has been a crazy subject for awhile now. Regardless of how they look in pics, pics can certainly be deceiving, i certainly wish him the very best, if he decides to marry Siobhan. I hope she doesn't take him for a ride, or maybe he should sign a pre-nup before geting married again.I just think he's going to fast with alot of things in his life right now. doing a movie, then 24 trying to get his shit together for the sake of his image. If being around Sib is an image thing for him or her, which I'm getting the feeling it could possibly be this, Maybe he should just live with her for awhile. It takes more than a year of being around someone to really get to know each other. I learned that by going through a divorce. I dated my 2nd husband for 3 1/2 years before marrying him. I learned that from my first mistake (husband). He was finally his real self after 5 years.. I am not trying to tear Kiefer or Siobhan down in any way. I am not a miserable, jealous person.
someone ask for vid? go to:
dazia24.altervista.org
their new rendezvous just this month (21 June)
With all these pics of SB where is the real love of K,s life. Do you realize that not 1 pic has been posted of K and his daughter being together since he got out of jail. The hell with BS, his daughter has been through everything with K then anyone else. BS just wants a magazine of her own from him. What he needs to do is patch things up with his daughter before he can move on. The Pics should be taking with her Dad and his new dog together, not BS. If BS really cared for KS she would move on and leave them alone. What daughter wants another strange woman around during this time. He must be really screwed up, taking fake pics with that woman. I would feel a shame if he was my Dad & totally embarrass. I thank God my Dad would never hurt or embarrass me the way he did with his girl. Is money and image all he cares about. How selfish! Get help with being a father first before taking a 3rd wife. She must have cried her eyes out alone when her Dad went to JAIL. BS back off and leave them alone please! You are trash if you can't understand a father and daughter relationship. The same for his PR's. Get his shit together. What a spoiled rich brat he turned out to be.
Posted by Marie
So, Marie, you know all the nitty-gritty details of Kiefer's relationship with his daughter, how he and she together worked through his DUI/jail term, how she feels about his relationship with Siobhan, etc HOW exactly?
You do realize that the actual portion of his life and their lives represented by the photographs we see of him (whether he's alone or with anyone) is a teeny, tiny fraction of the entirety of his/their lives, right?
p.s. she "wants a magazine of her own" from him? Huh? Where are you getting that from? (Well, I know... from the same place that you're getting all your other inside information. ;))
The idea that she's "moved on" from her ex-husband to Kiefer because she's after Kiefer's money demonstrates a lack of understanding of what the net worth of someone in her ex's financial position likely is vs Kiefer's. They're both wealthy men but, in terms of solid net worth, there's little doubt that her ex is worth far more... and his earning power isn't subject to the rollercoaster ups & downs of an acting career like Kiefer's is. Nor is he, so far as we know, pouring a lot of money into a side business as Kiefer is with Ironworks.
Whatever the reasons why her marriage broke up and whatever the reasons that she and Kiefer are together, it's extraordarily unlikely that it had anything to do with "trading up" financially.
Oh my! This is what i know, sib did have a serious boyfriend before David,who she quickly dumped and move up the ladder with david. when she started dating kiefer in july....he did not know she was still very married and living with david. in early sept,he asked her to attend a public event and she told him the truth. the romance was stalled. kiefer went back to la, where he resarted a fling with a quiet vet. there. Meanwhile david had found out about the affair and he and sib seperated in oct, he filed for a divorced in november. Which was granted in december. at this point kiefer was in jail. his other romance never goes very far because she hates the drinks,fame and the smoking. when he was released in jan, went to vist his daughter in nyc, and got re hooked up with sib. How do i know this? my cousin works at allure. while i cant give her name,she has heard most of this from other staffers. SB is not a sweet,lovely lady unless the cameras are on her. most of the people i know think she is the source of the marriage rumors. the most real photo of them is the one in phone store in nyc. that is him numb, and in daze, and her real personality shows. im not saying they arent a good lookin pair,and they may be in love..altough it sure dosent look like it,on his part. but she is most certainly in love with his fame,money and the press. you can belevie me or not..but thats what i know.
by the way christy, i think kiefer since 24 is way ahead of david..in the money dept. not to even consider the hollywood fame.this is a step up the ladder.
tara, you may be telling the truth as you've heard it/believe it, but...
If so, that Siobhan's an awfully chatty schemer... not to mention a psychic one. Otherwise, interesting that she'd know to describe the woman Kiefer may've had a fling with in the fall in the exact same way that she's been described on other internet sites. That's where your story gets a little iffy-sounding.
Kiefer was spotted more than once near the Allure offices in the late fall, which doesn't quite match your timeline either. (Not that he necessarily was there to see her, but it casts the "the re-hooked up in January" part into doubt.)
As for him being "dazed" in the photo in the Apple store... either that or he's just... listening. :) Also, though I know that any number of people believe you can see as clear as day that he's not interested in her, I've gotta say that I (and any number of people) can't see that so clearly.
To Anonymous (or tara, if that's you... I couldn't tell) - with his big 24 contract and all his executive producer residuals, etc, Kiefer's a very wealthy guy. But the owner of a modeling agency as big as DNA is *very* likely a whole lot wealthier. If Siobhan's goal is a Hollywood future, wouldn't she be manipulating Kiefer into a lot more high-profile LA sightings? Rather, they've barely been sighted there at all... and both times they were, she wasn't dressed-up or made-up. Evidently, she's both a chatty schemer and ultimately a rather ineffective one.
Also, it seems to me that she got a late start on her golddigging career; I would've expected her to have started working her way up the ladder when she was much younger if, in fact, that was her goal.
Look, I don't know. She may be a horrible person. I'm just saying that all the "evidence" to that effect that I'm reading on this and other sites isn't, to me, convincing proof of that.
convincing proof of that.
back from GA for this stuff... GAG!
well, except for Christy, the psychic, jealous, ignorant shrew-bitch count here is pretty high!!
shouldn't you skreech's be working for the government like Jack Bauer if YOU do know this much from a couple of photos, especially you Marie, since you also know the details of his relationship with his daughter, oh and what affect Sib has had on it. Kiefer would be disgusted if he met you and knew you were spouting this crap. it's insulting to him as a parent and a human beng and says more about the defects of YOUR person that you would imagine this crap. No one would want you for a daughter anyway, especially not a class act like Kiefer. SICKENING.
god, it must be so nice to be you... and know everthing about someone from a couple of pictures.
you're no fan of Kiefer's.. except in your own sick world.
& to Tara; do you honestly think anyone believes you about your mother working at allure? it's the internet. proof baby, proof. i can say i'm the Presidnt's wife if i want...
Sell it so someone else. youre no fan either, just another white-coat and net target.
To all of you big experts:
The SS Kiefer is not pulling into any of your ports... so GET OVER IT. The BS in this situation is what you're spouting. Sounds like all of you would rather have him be miserable without your gorgeus presence in his life thn be with someone else whos all that youre not: rich, beautful, succesful, and with KS. She gets to go home w/ him when theyre togethr and not you. Get over it.
What a bunch of jealous, immature skanks.
hey, just thought i would point out that david has 2 partners in owning the agency and a article on him nd them ran in vogue. they claimed his networth was 50 mil. i think kiefers is more than that. im not saying nything about the lady, or his love life. I just hope he really stops the drinking !
1.Kiefer's drinking will ultimately be the demise of any relationship he has.
2. David B. has been known to scout the bars for young models.
Take what you want from those 2 facts.
1.Kiefer's drinking will ultimately be the demise of any relationship he has.
2. David B. has been known to scout the bars for young models.
Take what you want from those 2 facts.
June 27, 2008 7:51 AM
Posted by: Tammy
Dear Know-Nothing Tammy... care to explain all the coupls who have coped with alcoholism over the course of long and othrwise happy marriages. what an infantile & ignorant person you are. you obviously have no life or life experience.
ANOTHER SHRIEKING PSYCHIC JUDGEMENTAL SHREW.
Oh... & PS tammy: what I took from your "facts" was that youre an idiot on the whole subjct.
Why all the shit about SB? Kiefer been with lots of woman and engaged to many and married 2 times. How many times did you hear reported he was in love? How many times have we hear his friends say he is happy with this one, plenty! KS always told people in interviews that he never displays the ones he loves the most. His Daughter, wife Kelly and other children of course. He was married to her for 12 yrs and we never really seen that many photos of any of them, Kelly always stood in the back ground at events. He protects their privately because he loves them. He loved Kelly very, very much. Rolling Stones Mag. He was with Kelly in April 2007 and their divorce and KS jail time must have been very very hard on them both. She was his best friend, he said in RS Mag. He has never lived with another woman because he was to hard to live with. He likes long distance relationships with Kelly, Bisson (Canada), Trica (NY) that girl in Iceland etc. (This is just my opinion Kiefer does not like any woman on top of him). The rest I wrote were his words on interviews. That should answer your questions about SB. Listen to his interviews Christy and Maven thats proof right there. And the DVD to "I Trust You To Kill Me" he talked about it also. You both are very demeaning. I would not be a bit surprise that Christy and Maven is SB. Very devious if you are. Both of you(SB) Pay Attention: (It means listen) You are way out of control and protesting to much to be anyone but SB. Tara, Marie, Tammy, Karen and the rest, I really respect listening to your opinions. Thanks for the Infor.
posted by Bflywithme
Dear Whoever you are... Yeah, this is SB. I have been in FL and then in GA the last few days and in have time while screwing Kief (i DO get to be on top unlike what you think - he's so little cept where it counts, but then you'll never know). yeah, i'm Sib, and I have time to argue with irrational shrews. if nothing else proves you dont know anything, this post does.
When *I* rely on you to answer my question about KS, it'll be after i have a traumatic head injury. get over your pathetic self. your making nothing more than guesses and whoever Christy is and i we are are saying is tht we dont know.
regardless. you're a huge fool. usually on the internet people come on and make up lies about sleeping with celebs and you do it for me saying i'm boinking KS!
the only thing funnier is respecting the opinions of the other morons here. Thanks for the LAUGH.
Maven in FL- Sorry, I just been to Japan and back and when I was there I saw KS and Rocco staying in the same hotel room together. True or False? There you go again calling ALL of us Morons. Always calling people names. Is that what you did in grade school. You are the moron here and a sick one. Your assignment for today is to read the articles on KieferRocks website and watch Jay Leno's interviews with KS. I'm not going to do your homework for you. As far as KS liking someone on top. He might also like it from behind. Who Knows for sure. So stop being nasty to everyone. We can all do that! You still do not know how to listen or read. I said, he does not like a woman on top of him; meaning in his way. When the truth hurts, that person usually responds in anger. And you are still protesting too much not to be her. You need to take a course in "Anger Management". Again devious! You are always on with Christy, every 2 hrs. You both need a Life or SB does. After all she only gets to share a teeny/tiny/weeny part of Kiefer's.
Post by: Bflywithme
Bflywithme, ignoring all your nastiness because, speaking for myself *only* (since I am myself only... not Siobhan... not Maven in FL... not anyone but myself), I think it's possible to disagree with people without being nasty to them (and my opinion on that subject goes for people I agree with and people I disagree with)... just want to say that it wouldn't surprise me at all if it were true that Kiefer and Rocco stayed in the same hotel room in Japan. In my observation, Kiefer's a complex and complicated and multi-faceted-in-all ways guy.
In other news, I'm not sure why you would leap to the conclusion that anyone who disagrees with the belief that it's possible to know everything about Siobhan and/or Kiefer and Siobhan's relationship based on a photographs and rumors *is* Siobhan. People simply perceive the world differently. For example, I've read/seen every interview that you've mentioned and the conclusions I've drawn from them don't, in most cases, agree with yours. That doesn't mean I'm Siobhan. It just means that we interpret available information differently.
Going back to Tammy's post... I can make guesses as to what you're inferring by juxtaposing an observation about Kiefer's drinking with one about David searching for young models in bars but, since I know basically nothing about David, I'll just leave that at guessing. Re: Kiefer's drinking, though, I do suspect that it - along with the highly-sexualized nature of his drunkenness - has been extremely tough, to put it mildly, on his attempts at relationships.
Maven in FL - sure, marriages survive alcoholism but, imo/experience, when it's active (and, though I haven't experienced this, especially, I'd expect, when it spurs infidelity), it's extraordinarily difficult to live with.
imo/observation, his relationship with alcohol is the single most problematic aspect of his life.
Though I included it, my signature isn't showing on the post above. (I've noticed that that sometimes happens on this site and It may appear later... as also sometimes happens.) In any case, it's me. :)
Maven in FL- Sorry, I just been to Japan and back and when I was there I saw KS and Rocco staying in the same hotel room together. True or False? There you go again calling ALL of us Morons. Always calling people names. Is that what you did in grade school. You are the moron here and a sick one. Your assignment for today is to read the articles on KieferRocks website and watch Jay Leno's interviews with KS. I'm not going to do your homework for you. As far as KS liking someone on top. He might also like it from behind. Who Knows for sure. So stop being nasty to everyone. We can all do that! You still do not know how to listen or read. I said, he does not like a woman on top of him; meaning in his way. When the truth hurts, that person usually responds in anger. And you are still protesting too much not to be her. You need to take a course in "Anger Management". Again devious! You are always on with Christy, every 2 hrs. You both need a Life or SB does. After all she only gets to share a teeny/tiny/weeny part of Kiefer's.
Post by: Bflywithme<<<<<
Yeah... Siobhan. HAH... I'm also Jesus!
is any of that dreck you're offring supposed to mean anything... Oh and i guess since kiefer was now in a hotel room w/ rocco he was gay?? is that your latest excuse for why he's not on top of you. what a riot you are... thanks for the total laugh - both you and what youre spouting HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. made my day. great job...
How can anyone beleive that Kiefer Sutherland is a class act. Here is a ugly fact. There is this special person that you love very very much. He joins the Military, to service his country, goes through basic training, gets shipped overseas, saves a person life and recieves "The Medal of Honor", comes home for a break, is out jogging to stay in shape for when he goes back, gets hit by a drunk driver from behind, is throw 50 feet in the air, his body comes crashing down to earth. The drunk drive is alive but the one you love is gone. We became big fans of 24 not realizing that Kiefer Sutherland is a drunk and gets a DUI, Not one but 2 others and we wonder how many times he has done this without getting caught. The Judge gives him 2 separate sentences. KS is allow to pick the time. He decides to do his time during his break of 24 (PR's say he will do anything to save 24, whatever it was).He gets off easy with only 48 days. You read he gave up his Birthday, Christmas and The New Year. What they did not tell you was, his daughter has college break at that time. This way she can go home and not hear the ugly things drunk drives families can say. That was a good thing of course, she is the innocent one here after all. Her mother probably requested this. Then the fans beleive that KS is a Hero giving up his holidays. He gets Fan mail but what happen to the Hate mail. His PR's believe that a letter like this is hate mail and throw them in the trash of course. To emotional for there Star to read. These are letters of passion not hate. We want DUI drivers off the road. We are trying to save another love ones life, maybe his daughters or someone you love. Will MR KS get it after 20 yrs of drinking and partying. He has a bodyguard to protect him from this passionate & real stuff. He thinks by having a new girlfriend, new dog, new clothes, new phone etc, it will make him feel better about himself. He is only looking good so he can get is licenses back and maybe next time kill someone. He will really bring ugliness to his family because he does not care, neither do his PR's. They know who butters their bread. Penny & Sue read everything about KS. Lets see how much they care about KS and his Fans. Are they PR's? The guy needs tough love in his life. Do you believe he is going to AA GROUP meeting or private ones? Do I want SS Kiefer sailing into my port, do I wish my daughter had him for a father (Hell No), Is he still a class act or Hero now? This is for my son Dean, who is Our true HERO & we miss and love him so much. This is posted by his father who also was in the Navy and serviced his country as a Police Officer for 36 years with Honor. Need Proof, I have it. Will the service men and woman and government members still watch or care about 24 now? Where is their Honor! Shame on them! Help save a Life and get Drunk Drivers of the road, you could be next. This post is for ALL Drunk Drivers. Jack
Thank you for your post and for putting it all in perspective. I'm sorry for your loss and thank your son for his service. Your words were 100% true.
The other part of my post got cut off.
He has a bodyguard to protect him from the real Stuff. He has a new girlfriend, new dog, new clothes etc, he thinks these new items will make him feel good about himself. This shows that KS just does not get it and neither does his PR's. Will they get it when he gets his licenses back and kills someone. Do you beleive KS would attend AA Group meetings or a Private ones? This post is for my son Dean who we love and miss very much. He is Our True HERO. I was in the Navy and serviced 36 yrs as a Police Officer for my country with Honor. Do I want SS Kiefer sailing into my port, do I wish he was the father to my beautiful daughter (HELL NO), is he a class act now. Will other service men and woman and government members still think he is cool or want his vote? Will they still watch 24? Where is there Honor? Shame on them! Penny and Sue's web site reads everything about KS. I know they will read this but will they post it on there web page for all of his fans to see? Are they his PR's too. If they really care for KS they will post this because what KS needs is What we call Tough Love. He is not getting this from his family or this would not have continued for 20 yrs. We are just trying to keep Drunk Drivers off the roads and save maybe your love ones life. Yes this is ugliness and we hope you are never affected with it. Please think of our Son Dean and the Hero he was. Need Proof, I have it. His loving Father Jack.
Thank you Tammy. Your words are making me cry. And it feels good to cry, knowing I'm right about posting this. It was hard. Thanks a million times. Jack
to whomever you are posting about your sons death... if- if - if this is true, i'm sorry but you have no rational reason to make kiefer a public scapegoat of some sort because of his drinking problem. everyting youre saying here is meaningles for your son and Kiefer.
it's up to him to deal with his drinking problem - posts on the internet aren't going to mean squat. you don't have any way to reach him or "fix" him like this.
IF this isn't true, god help you - it's irational to dump all this on a celeb and maybe the person who needs addction help is you. you've never been near the man, youre not in his life and youve got no reason to make these superweird publc announcemnts. if he stops drinking and sends you a "thank you" note i'll apologize..
Jack, I'm tremendously sorry for your loss.
I think that your attack on Kiefer here is fairly irrational, but I understand that grief can have that effect.
I don't think anyone here is defending the practice of drunk driving or that Kiefer ever has or would either.
Again, my sympathies on your loss.
Christy thanks for trying to understand but we were fans of 24-we just can't watch it again. This awareness is to all drunk drivers,they kill.Close people in his life knew he had a problem for 20 yrs. Where were they the night he left the party? He has money to hire a driver or call a taxi,41 yrs & knows the law. NO Excuses. I wish that he could feel our grief or read some letters privately with victims like us. We want to help him realize, it could be his owe or him laying there. We just want to save his life too. Next time he will go to prison for a long time or get life in Prison if he kills someone. Drinking & Driving kills Christy it is NO accident. I'm sure he is sorry but they all are. I just read he was drinking again but with a driver. God! I just want to cry for him. Thanks so much Christy for your sympathy. If you know him, anyone, save him. He always seem like a nice guy on interveiws. Thanks! Jack "For Our Dean"
Jack, this is Tishjeans. Christy gave me the ugliness award. I'm sorry for the ugliness that came into your life. You are a proud father and I honor you and your son. When I first got my licenses, I was speeding alot, couldn't seem to focus on my driving and speed. I got a speeding ticket/my dad made me pay for the Ticket/Insurance. He took me to a funeral where a young girl killed herself by speeding. I remember walking in/seeing a large picture of a pretty girl on top of the Close casket. We know what that means, don't we Jack. My Dad said, baby I don't want you to be that person or kill anyone. We both cried together that night/I couldn't drive for 2 days. My friends say I drive like a old lady. This is the same as drinking and driving. Right Jack? I still remember. Thanks Dad! SS Kiefer should have his driver, drive him into that port. He sets a fine example for his daughter. I feel sorry for them. This is ugliness Christy. I will help at my end Jack. All the best Sir Jack.
Jack, again, my deepest condolences on your loss. I know that the loss of your dear son is a sorrow that will never leave you.
If I had it in my power to wave a magic wand and make the problems of drunk driving (and, as it applies in the specific case and in general, alcoholism) disappear, I *certainly* would do it. I very VERY much wish that was possible.
Since it's not, I agree with you that it's extraordinarily important for people to continue to get the word out about how it's *never* acceptable to drive drunk.
That said, I think that you're imagining people making excuses for drunk driving here (and in general) that people aren't actually making. imo, there really is a difference between being able to extend forgiveness in a situation like this and excusing the behavior.
The bottomline, though, is that I completely understand your sorrow and your anger and I wish you and your loved ones whatever peace with that you're able to find.
Again, my deepest sympathies are with you.
Tishjeans, I think that what your dad said was very smart and my compliments to him for thinking to do that and to you for, hopefully, once and for all getting the message about careless driving.
That said, no, I don't think that a teenager's heedlessness necessarily is a one-to-one comparator for the extremely complicated issue of alcoholism (and other substance addiction) as it relates to drunk (or otherwise impaired) driving. Would that it were so easy.
... and, just as an aside, that you would even THINK to mention/compare the ugliness that I perceived in your nasty personal attack on a woman you don't know who happens to be spending time (of whatever type) with an actor you don't know (to be clear, none of us do) with the heartbreaking, forever life altering horror of someone losing a child in a horrible and preventable accident is, to me, further proof that there's something ugly (or, at the very least, tremendously immature) going on at your core.
jack... i'm sorry if your son did die (i mean its the internet, this could be tru or no, right?) but its silly to say that it has anything to do with Keifer driving drunk. i think the reason i can't totaly believe that youre telling the truth is that using Kiefer for a scapegoat is just irrational. it just makes me think you have some other thing against him snce it makes no sense. it doesn't matter what KS can afford or not, he's got an ILLNESS called alcoholism; its got nothing to do with anybody else being dead unless he drives drinking again and kill them. your point is pointless. Leave him alone and whether or not you watch 24 is just... geez.
Even if you do have a dead child, going on a message board and going on about Kiefer doesn't really achieve much for him, does it. Are you hoping to make people not watch 24 because of your kid, not gonna happen. Find a real way to make a diffrence if this is for real. KS has nothung to do with this.
Jack is just saying that not only should KS stop drinking and driving but all of us. He just feels betrayed because 24 brought KS into their home not realizing that he is a heavy drinker and partier. He also said that KS seem like a nice guy. Just wants someone to help him. We all hope KS is going to make it and others like him. If someone like Jack does not send messages like this out, where would we all be. Tishjeans post was just as brilliant. I will keep their message in mind for my children. Sometimes we all say such petty things but this came from the heart. Its called reality. Pt by Bflywithme.
For heaven's sake, no one is arguing that anyone, including Kiefer, SHOULD drive drunk. So, while I feel extreme sympathy for his loss, I don't really get what you mean by "If someone like Jack does not send message like this out, where would we all be."
Um, where we'd all be is that, if anyone out there is *in favor* of drunk driving or thinks it's a good thing, they need their heads (and hearts) examined.
Are you saying you were unaware that driving drunk was a bad thing until Jack posted? I hope not.
As for "feeling betrayed because 24 brought KS into their home not realizing that he is a heavy drinker and partier," that's frankly ridiculous (and I'm not even sure that's what Jack is saying). Like many people who do all kinds of jobs, Kiefer has a substance abuse problem. There's no "betrayal" in him doing his job (which is acting) while at the same time being an alcoholic.
I had a cousin who was in a convertible car with some other kids that were drinking. They were going so fast that the car went airborne over a bridge and through electrical wires. You can image the rest. It was devastating. Will you claim my story is untrue too Maven?
What about the story of KS being at the Whiskey Go Go Bar, drinking again and with a new girlfriend right after a AA meeting. Is this story also untrue Maven? There are other places on the internet that post messages about things like this happening Maven, not just on X17. KS doesn't have a large fan base anyway, it very small. KS screws up fine examples like Brad Pitt who is trying to make a differents in Hollywood. BP can hold his head up high for his kids. A Fact- 24 is just a TV show, it can be turned off. In memory of Judy.
What happened to your cousin was horrible and I'm so sorry.
... and the rest of your post is, well, kind of irrational. What does the size of Kiefer's fanbase have to do with this discussion? And of course 24 is just a TV show and can be turned off. I don't understand what that has to do with this discussion either.
I'd love to know where you heard that he was at an AA meeting before going to the Whiskey A Go Go last Saturday night. In any case, even if that were true, so? Alcoholics go to AA meetings and then drink all the time. That, among other reasons/symptoms, is because they're... alcoholics.
He didn't drive and that is what he can't do when he's drunk (or at all right now for that matter). Whether or not you or I or anyone else believes that he'd be better off not drinking is irrelevant to the question of whether or not he drives drunk.
Bottomline, if you don't want to watch 24 because Kiefer got a DUI (or for any other reason), that's of course entirely your right. None of which changes the fact that Kiefer, like a whole lot of people in this world, appears to have a severe problem with alcohol *or* that, of course, he must NOT drive drunk... which is true of everyone.
Ack, this site is so weird with its disappearing & reappearing signature lines. My signature's not showing up on the post above right this second (though it'll probably be back later), but it's me... Christy.
i finally figured this site out. Save for a few OBVIOUS rational posts -the rest of you are crack pots.
Flywithme... 24 did NOT betray ANYONE. That kiefer has a substance abuse problem is an extremely well known situation. he's even been arrested before. The people who hired him to play jack bauer knew the hell out of that.
whatever's happened in your or someone ELSE'S personal life - blaming the hiring staff of a TV show, expecting a "tv character" or an actor to be your scapegoat, and ranting about it on the internet are just signs of lunacy and some silly, pointless, irratoinal agenda.
Try blaming the people directly involved who deserve it( if there are any and all this has happned) and having them take some responsibility... including yourselves if you deserve it.
GROW UP... KS has nothing to do w/ your problems.
This is my first attempt at being part of a conversation. I love Kiefer Sutherland and I think he's the greatest actor I've ever seen. His personal life is all over the internet, he has not private life. I love him!!
Patricia
Hi Patricia.
I agree with you that Kiefer is a tremendously talented actor! :)
Actually, compared to some other celebrities and if you think about how much guessing goes on about what really is or isn't going on in his life, I think he lives pretty much under the media radar most of the time... which I think it great for him! :)
Hope your 4th was safe & pleasant. We had a fire behind my house & the fire dept. couldn't get back there to put it out, they had to use my hose! scarey!!
We also had an illegal rocket misfire and come straight at us at my daughters
house. We had to jump out of it's way. It started a fire 10 feet from our chairs. I've never seen it so bad!! Kiefer said in "I trust you to kill me"
that he tries to keep his private life
private. I can't imagine what he and others go through!! Kiefer has given us
6 years of his life doing "24". He is amazing & very pleasant to look at!!
Kiefer is another Rock Hudson/Tom Cruise? I get it now! I didn't know he was married for 12 yrs. What woman would stay with Badass KS for 12. Marriage of Convenience cause he is gay. She divorces him to cash in on all his lovely money after he goes to jail, just encase his career goes down the tubes. How smart is she? Did he marry his 1st for citizenship? What kind of LURE is on his hook for SB? No wonder Julia flew! Come out of the closet, Elton John did. Product:Kiefer Sutherland! Warranty:Damaged Goods!Customer:"I trust you to return my money". 24-It's time to kill off KS. New acting rolls- A Drunk & A Gay. That's Hollywood- DAMN IT! DAMN IT!
Hey, Patricia. I had a quiet and lazy 4th of July. It was great! Yours had more going on - some of it scary! Hope all is well now. Yep, I think that Kiefer's a great actor *and* very pleasant to look at too! :D
KS, did you get the 4-year degree at the School of Ignorance or did you just go for the 2-year certificate program?
Good grief. Jump to (incorrect) conclusions much?
He didn't marry his first wife for citizenship because... guess what? He's not a citizen. Strike One.
He and his second wife were separated for almost nine years before they divorced. No one but them knows why they didn't finalize the divorce sooner, but there's less than zero evidence that she "divorced him for his money after he went to jail." He was the one who filed for divorce, by the way... and many years ago. Strike Two.
He's not gay, which isn't to say that his sexuality, like much about him, may not be complex. Who really knows... and not that your simple-mindedness could comprehend it if it was. But it's demonstrably verifiable that he's not gay. Not that it would matter at all if he was in terms of anything but who he keeps company with in his private life. Strike Three.
... and you're out. Thank you for playing. Well, no... not really.
Why would anyone who isn't a fan be here
on this site? Are you that bored that
you have to invent negative things to say about such an incredible man? If you have all your fingers on one hand you will find that Sarah was born 5 months after they got married. I think
that's pretty noble!! Now days, they don't even bother with the moral high ground. Kiefer was a very good hockey player and was on the rodeo circuit for
3 or 4 years. He has a few scars from fights. That isn't a gay man's style.
Regardless of his sexual preferences, I'm sure you would be the last person he would even say hello to!!
Yes, everything here is fine. No more
fires! I'm here in Las Vegas and we have high smoke from the California fires. I'm glad Kiefer's place is not
in a fire-prone location!!
Hi Patricia! great to see you here and I like your style... them facts things sure are hard to argue with, aren't they. Don't worry about the idiots like KS.... they're here to offer themselvves as target practice for ignoramus season so that we can all keep sharp.
glad to see your posts and i love kiefer, too. I think he's the most brilliant actor going. He deserves to be in some classy stuff on the big screen. he's as good or better than anyone on the A-list now. i want to see him win Oscars to go with his Emmy.
Good morning Maven,
I soooo agree. I worked 2 jobs while I raised my kids alone. I missed Kiefer in "real time". I just saw "24" for the first time in June of 2006. I was so amazed at his talent that I've been buying his movies as often as I can. Each movie is a different character. I get lost in them!!I don't know how one man can be so different in appearance & substance. I hate to see him die in so many though! I would like to know which site would be the best to get current information on his appearances on TV. Do you have "a go to site" to get that information. Kiefer was awarded "the Hollywood Walk of Fame Star", do you know if he has actually put his hands in the concrete on Hollywood Blvd yet?
No, he will not recieve the Award because he committed a crime, lost his licenses, went to jail & is on 5 yrs probation for Drinking & Driving. Besides how will this great and wonderful Actor get there? WALK!!! Kiefers PR's hire computer geeks to watch his site. Poor baby Kiefer does not know how to response. No computer skills. And now, we are finding out he might be GAY. The seed has been planted. I willn't buy any of his products either. 3 strikes your out is a term for jailbirds like Kiefer's. 3 strikes, your out and the game is over is baseball. 9 inning in baseball you geek. I hit the ball out of the Ball Park, it lands in shit up to your neck. Go Retrieve it!
Wow, you're a fine specimen of humanity, aren't you?
Kiefer will receive his star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame some time in the next 3-1/2 or so years. There's a five year window to schedule the event after the announcement and, iirc, his announcement was about a year and a half ago.
His DUI arrest and jail time will have absolutely no effect on the Hollywood Walk of Fame star.
The rest of your ranting is unworthy of response... other than to reiterate what an ignorant and ugly piece of work you are.
Patricia, earlier I posted something that included links to a couple of sites - one to keep up on Kiefer's appearances on TV (like when movies he's in are airing, etc) and the other that's a great source of Kiefer news in general. The post required moderator approval (probably because of the links). If it doesn't show up eventually, I'll come back and give you the scoop on what to Google.
Christy, thank you! Do we know if this "luni" is a man or woman? I can't believe anyone could be so hateful!! I assume "it" was talking to me--therefore, I will respond. Some of my best friends are gay! My second job for 2.5 years was as a cashier in a gay nite club. Nice nice people!! I think your "male testosterone" is showing it's ugly head!! Concerning Kiefer's computer skills: I'll trade one of his dreamy smiles for all the computer skills you think you have!! Someone suggested that we use you for "target practice", will, I own a Remington 870 shotgun, a Browning 308 rifle and a Smith & Wesson 22 target pistol, also 2 bows, one of which is strung at 50 lbs for big game hunting. As you can see, I can defend myself--I can also hit a ball out of the park, I've even knocked out the right center statium lights. I have won tournaments in softball, volleyball, soccer, basketball, tennis, table tennis, racquetball, horseshoes, swimming, bowling and many other sports!
So don't f'k with me. Pull up your pants and go home!!You aren't worth my anger! I would like to address the DUI but it will take too much space--maybe next time!!
Christy, I get local listings for his movies but I didn't know about that Corner Gas piece until after it was over! I have since found it online. My mom likes Kiefer also but these computer screens are just too small for her to see well--by the way, I'm 62 and a mother of 3 and grandmother of 5. Thanks again for your help
Patricia, I don't know whether this person is male or female. I just know that, whatever s/he is, s/he is ignorant and ugly and his/her ignorance isn't worth our energy. :)
To find Kiefer-on-TV listings, Google "Kiefer Sutherland TV Listings" and the second thing that pops up in the list is a link to a site where you'll find his listings. You may need to set your timezone and cable provider.
To find out about Kiefer news in general, including things like upcoming talk show appearances, Corner Gas-like appearances, etc, Google "Kiefer-Rocks". The first listing that comes up is "Kiefer Sutherland Fan Site".
To find great collections of Kiefer photos, Google "kieferbenny", "dazia" and "pennykeating".
Good luck and let me know if you have any questions.
imo, you and your mom have great taste! :)
Thanks Christy--most of my family loves Kiefer. My 11 year old granddaughter won the Gymcanna rodeo events here in Nv. for 2007. She roped her first calf a few months ago.(My daugher also rides). She loves "Lost Boys" My oldest granddaughter ice skates, runs track in school and plays the guitar & piano. She and her brother both like Kiefer Sutherland movies. Speaking of which, season 6 episode 17 is on right now in Texas, we get it later in the evening. It's a really great show. I have it on DVD & VCR and I still watch it on TV. It's the finalle of the main story line. Kiefer is under the garbage truck and saves the "Nukes" --great show!! Thanks again for your help!! I've got to get some housework done, I really got wrapped up in this discussion today.
Talk to you soon!!
Boy, enjoyed that baseball game that anonymous played out. Patricia is a very poor loser! Can't be from the USA and not know how to play baseball. She is a computer geek like Maven and Christy. They sound like a AD in a magazine selling Kiefer Sutherland. I only buy things "MADE IN THE USA". I prefer a MP5...M16...AK47 myself. I would not go Big Game Hunting for bear with anything less then a Compound bow 75lb pull. 50lb is for small bunny rabbits. I don't know, can a woman still f'k at 62, sounds old to me. Dreaming it might be Kiefer, only in your dreams. He can't even do it with a young woman. Sick old lady. My best friend is gay, but he never hid in a closet like Kiefer. Hateful Geeks! posted by: The USA
Wow, USA -i was going to say commerial. So cool USA
I come 2 X17 2 get the scoop on the stars. The 3 geeks/sound like 3 friends in their 60's/who need 2 ask their kids 2 help them set up email. Its easy.
Next..KS MIGHT be gay/their were rumors 3 yrs ago about him & Rocco. I was surprise 2 see him w/a girl but no emotions there. I was nuts over Lance Bass/I bought his items/he announced he was gay/I had a bonfire in my backyard. Its ok 2 like the shows/movies theyr'e in. They pretend on shows/pretend in real life/we'll never no who they really R. Live & Learn! Don't waste $$$$ on them. I think I'll wait 4 Mirrors 2 come out on DVD/cheaper 2 rent/now that I have the scoop on KS. Ellen was brave 2 come out being gay/she gave us a choice 2 like her or not. Thanks fans/X-fans.
Patricia, my advice is... don't respond. :)
Talk about a "geek", there are no bear anywhere close to where I live. We hunt deer! You're a very sick person and I won't respond to anymore of your rants.
Christy, do you know if they have started filming "24" episode 9? I read that they were going to be filming till the end of the year. I sure hope that other strike doesn't happen. I taped "The Wild" the other day. That is really a cute show. My 11 year old granddaughter stayed with me last night and she fell asleep watching it. Listening to Kiefer's voice without watching him was a"strange" sinsation. As far as Kiefer and his lady friend, the pictures that I've seen don't show much emotion of any kind--I did notice that Kiefer walked "street-side" most of the time. Chivalry is still important to some! I also noticed that the streets of New York are in bad shape!
They're likely shooting episodes 13 & 14 of season 7 right now, Patricia... and, based on their normal shooting schedules (and if there's no strike), they'll be shooting well into October to finish the season.
Even if there's a strike and even if it lasts through the end of this year (which strike length I think would be *very* unlikely), 24 should be okay in terms of s7. If there's a strike and they have to stop shooting, they could start airing the season in January as planned and finish shooting episodes while the season is running (which is what they do every year when there's no strike).
I love The Wild! Very cute. :)
... and, yes, I love Kiefer's natural chivalry too. It's adorable!
Christy- because they have more time, do you think they are taking it a little easier--8 to 10 hour days with week ends off? I'm close enough to go to LA. Do you have any knowledge about a contact person or phone #; I'd like to go watch the taping? I thought he was going to be on "American Idol Gives Back" so I took off work-spent $100 for a room for 2 days, drove over 600 miles, $100 in gas, $100 for a ticket---but he wasn't there in person, I was so disappointed!!This time, I want to make sure of my facts!! The money, drive & time would have been nothing if I could have seen him in person--even from the 2nd balcony!!There comes a time in everyone's life when there is very little to look forward to--I was sure looking forward to that trip!!! I was totally amazed with the KODAK Theatre!! The lighting for that show was incredible. The theatre was maybe 8 stories high and the lighting came down from everywhere!!
At least so far as I understand it, they'll be continuing with their normal shooting schedule (i.e., they shoot an episode pair basically every three weeks). Though they have more time, I doubt they have any additional budget with which to stretch the shooting schedule. Everyone who's on the show comments on what an extremely efficient machine it is... so, heck, it might be harder for them to slow that down and spread it out than it for them to keep doing it like they always have done it. ;)
Sorry to hear that you went Kiefer-less at Idol Gives Back. Hope you enjoyed your trip anyway, but that must've been disappointing.
The show's shooting set is closed and there's no way of knowing when/where they'll be shooting on location in advance so I'm afraid there's no way to plan a trip to watch them shoot. It would be wonderful to watch them work, wouldn't it? Oh well! :)
Christy, thanks for the info. That's really a "bummer". The trip to Hollywood was special. It was my first. It's a very old city now!! The buildings are looking their age. To see the streets made famous in movies and songs was kind of emotional. I drove to where I thought Kiefer's home was, but, I felt like I was "invading his privacy" so I turned around and came home. I didn't see any sites--but I was within a few blocks of Kiefer's home and that made the trip worth it!!I know that sounds CORNY, but maybe not to a Kiefer Sutherland fan!! I've seen some of the taping of Mirrors so I have some idea of how it works. I have never given it any thought concerning how close the camera's are or how many times they must repeat a scene. It's truly amazing how much hard work it is. I'm glad Kiefer and other actors chose to be on that side of the camera. Life would be so boring without them!!
The person who wrote about Lance Bass...Your perspective of Hollywood is 100%. Don't support their Drug/Drinking habits. We work harder then they do, buy something that will last longer then their careers. Their shit only goes out on the trash or to a yard sale. Rent DVD's at Shop Rite 1$ a night. USA...way to go man. You know your gun power better then Gay-Jack Bauer. Need some missiles. HA HA. Those 60 yr old woman or geeks do sound like a AD. The 60 yr olds are humiliating themselves wanting to follow KS. Like he will notice them. Go to a Bar ladies you will find the same thing there & alot cheaper. "Do not Litter keep America clean of Hollywood".
Christy, my work week starts tomorrow so I probably won't be on this site for a while. I thought it would be fun to swap stories about Kiefer's movies and which ones everyone likes the best & what scenes are the best--but I guess that's not going to happen
Patricia, you should check out the Fox 24 forum board. Google "Fox 24" and choose the first hit in the list. When you get to the site, click on 'Board' and then scroll down to the "Kiefer Sutherland/Jack Bauer" folder and you'll find thread after thread talking about Kiefer movies and all kinds of stuff.
Have a good work week!
Dear USA... funny you got such probs w/ someone gay since youre ablt to type w/ yr head up yr ass, i figured that'd be a thing you liked. up yours you 0bviously enjoy it.... the biggest critics always do, right Sen Craig?
Maven--love your frankness!!
Christy--change of plans. I went to fix a sprinkler line late last night and that's not the problem. I've been digging since daylight. I'm sure it's the main sprinkler line from the street.
Goin' be a chore. I've had to turn the water on to trace the leak--anyway, in between letting the water dry up I watched " I trust You to Kill Me" and Season Five between 6 & 8 pm. Some of Kiefer's most fastastic drama in#5; in real life he is so excited about going to Europe with the band--To be able to be that fantastic when his heart is packing is incredible--check it out! Thanks for the info. I'll go there. I really enjoy our chats but I've never been one for gosip. I've been a Payroll bookkeeper for most of my working years and we tend to be "not talkative" Take care to all the Kiefer fans and "bad thoughts" to the others!!
Goodbye!
THE 60'S CHRISTY/MAVEN/PATRICIA,YOU STILL SOUND LIKE A AD THAT YOU'LL FIND IN A LURE MAGAZINE/SELLING US KIEFER SUTHERLAND PRODUCTS. I WONDER IF THAT MAGAZINE IS GETTING A 1% PROFIT IN TRYING TO SELL HIM OR IF HER BOSS KNOWS SHE IS SELLING OTHER PRODUCTS BESIDES THEIR OWN. I LIKE GAY PEOPLE BUT NOT THE ONES WHO HIDE. KS IS GAY/SIOBHAN BONNOURIER ALSO CAN BE GAY. SEEMS LIKE NO ONE THOUGHT OF THIS!! THAT PROBABLY WHY HER HUSBAND GOT THE DIVORCE SO... FAST. SHE LOOKS LIKE A BIG MAN NEXT TO MIDGET KIEFER. HER SIDEVIEW PHOTOS SHOW A HORRIBLE NOSE/HER EYESBROWS, NEED TO BE DONE OVER. WHATEVER HAPPEN TO "GRAY IS THE NEW BLACK" SHE WORE BLACK IN EVERY PIC. A LURE SHOULD PRACTICE WHAT THEY PREACH. FOR THE USA..GO MAN! BONFIRE GIRL..WISH I WAS THERE..GREAT! THANKS FOR THE TIP FOR RENTING 1$ DVD'S. PEOPLE AGAINST DUI'S..I HEAR YOU! 3 IDIOTS GEEKS WHO ARE NOT FROM THE USA.. YOUR POISONOUS ADS CAN GO INTO THE RECYLING BIN.
H-E-L-L-O Paticia! Now we know she is not from the USA. She did not see BRAD PITT at "AMERICAN IDOL GIVES BACK". What are you nuts, talking about the "LIGHTING" in the theatre! A True A-List, American Idol there. The biggest star there, lending his "WATTAGE" to the event, whose sheer presence caused such a uproar, filming had come to a halt until the crowd calmed down. He was there to Represent, His People..."The United States of America". Thee American Idol! And you didn't mention him!!!
Kiefer Sutherland was a big disappointment to Canada & his fans in the USA. You really didn't expect him to show his face in public did you, being a EX-CON. The crowd would have BOOED...HIM. They gave him a 2 second spot behind the scene to read one sentence. He was probably too DRUNK to read more then that. He became too involved with himself. I willn't go into what could of happen (its in the above comments). He had his PR's apologize for him. When KS, himself apologizes to the public (USA) like a man then I will forgive him & maybe others will follow.
You wasted your time & money at American Idol. Why didn't you "Give Back" to the REAL people that need it. KS has enough money that he spends on his drinking habits.
Jesus "LIGHTING". Patricia you are a disgrace to this country. You & your guns should be deported to SING-SING! You should SHUT YOUR MOUTH! You only bring shame to him & his family by thinking you can advertise for him. He is the only person that can ERASE the shame.
Good Luck to...Brad Pitt/Angelina/his family!!
SING-SING is Lying. To see Brad Pitt in person is to DIE FOR!
As the 3 geeks or SB were advertising Kiefer Sutherland they also insulted Brad Pitt.Did she forget how Brad works so hard in New Orleans/side by side with REAL people building homes. She was bragging about how hard it must be for K.Sutherland to work behind the camera/with his trailer to nap in/being waited on/he does not work 10 hrs straight and he is making millions on 24. OH MY! Did she realize she also INSULTED the REAL men/women who work at CTU/other Branches of Government who protect us/by putting their life on the line every single day/some even taking a real bullet/they earn nothing compared to K Sutherland. They are the Real Workers. How Shallow/disrespectful this person is for not know what is REAL.
The WATTAGE has just dimmed for 24 here! BeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeP
I never hear of Allure mag. it must be for 60+ woman. Her clock is ticking at her job and she is on the move for her next target. A rich Man to keep her! People in the fashion world are looking for fresh younger ideas, she is getting to old for it & she knows her career will be over soon.
My sister works in the fashion circles of NYC. She said that the woman are real nice to your face but if you come up with a great creative idea and the boss wants to use it, then the CLAWS come out and they want to back you into a corner. She told them that Jersey Girls do not waste their time with claws or messing up their manicures, they just bring out their FIST(laugh.) NYC woman are devious, they will stab you in the back in a New York minute. They do know, not to cross a Jersey Girl because we can be very vicious when it comes to protecting what is ours. I hope someone is guarding Kiefer's daughters back.
For the Jersey Girls!
I also worked in NYC and came face to face with the ones climbing the ladder, they do devious shit behind every ones back because they are chicken shit. I would not put it pass Siob. Bonn. being the 3 geeks on this site because that's the way people like her work in NYC. She would actually Google herself and answer by pretending to be someone else or 3 different people. (Got to watch the ones with 3 different personalities. Don't they kill?). Yes, this woman has been around the block many many many times. Now, she is doing it with KS. NEED PROOF! Look at the HUGE BUNION on her left foot.(laugh) She can barely walk. My 86yr. old grandmom has one and they can't operate because she is to fragile. If this woman wants to continue to walk those blocks many many more times she better have it fixed before she gets to old. Maybe in the next year, her clock is ticking. (laugh)
It may seem that Kiefer has finally seen the light about Siobhan. Rumour is they have broken up..Apparantly she bad mouthed Kiefers daughter Sarah and started the rumours that they were getting married.. If it is true I hope he has shown her the door..he deserves better than some Gold digger..
Thanks for the info. Kiefer loves his daughter, he is going to be very protective of her, who wouldn't be in his position. It's common sense not to get his daughter involved or introduce her to every Jane he goes out with. Why would SB bad mouth Kiefers daughter? That Bitch! Maybe SB wanted to meet Sarah and Sarah said, NO WAY! SMART GIRL. Maybe SB wants to cash in on some of Sarah's inheritance money. I'm glad someone is guarding his daughters back.
Why would Kiefer want to marry again and have someone take his money, if it does not work out? Is he NUTS! Angelina & Brad live together and it seems to be working out. Someone should inform Kiefer, that you do not have to get married to prove anything. He can't be that stupid! REALLY! I hope he KICKS her out the door..Or maybe someone should kick him and wake him up.
So, you folks are taking the Globe (which is where those rumors originated), well-known "source" of all kinds of randomly made-up stuff, as the real deal.
Interesting.
Of course, people who believed that Kiefer and Siobhan were getting married just because a tabloid said so would, I guess, be prone to believe the Globe too.
It's kind of surprising, though, that people who are brilliantly gifted enough to know *exactly* what the motives of a person they've never met are (I mean, that really IS quite a skill) also are thinking-challenged enough not to recognize that tabloids make stuff up. Always have. Always will.
Well, Kief and Sib havent been seen together for a few weeks now and he hooked up with Darla Gordon a couple of weeks ago who hes been dating on and off. Lets see what happens in the next week or so if Siobhan appears with him again, but I have the feeling hes moved on from her.
Looks like one of the geeks are back or could it be SB, trying to defend her actions.
People at Kiefer's end put the marriage rumors to rest, really fast! It looks like most of us on this site knew Kiefer would not marry her. Seens like we know Kiefer PRETTY GOOD.
How do you know I'm not a good friend of his daughter? Her friends use the internet too. SB would be the last person Kiefer would tell his secrets to because of a thing called TRUST. Their are people out there who know SB too & they love to talk. Alot of the talk is not great about her. You don't know shit Christy! Poor Woman! Get over it.
Many times the tabloids are right too!
You're funny. In a really really sad kind of way.
Kiefer's ex-wife Kelly is beautiful! What does he see in this dog? She looks like the wicket witch of the East, she wears black, black, black and more black. Probably a black heart to go along with the clothes. What a ugly nose. Needs a face & dress make over. You need someone beautiful, young and fun with a sweet heart on your arm again Kiefer. Look for someone with a beautiful sexy dress on with some bright life in the color. She is so BIG and OLD and she'll make you feel the same way Kiefer.
I dont think hes with her anymore...?
Its been a while since she was last seen with him.
He's recently been dating other dark haired beauties around LA as far as Ive heard...
Hello Amanda, where have you heard about that ? Sorry, I'm curious ...There's a recent sighting of Kiefer with a dark haired woman and nothing tells us she's not her. Perhaps, they desire for more privacy ? who knows ?
I don't know Siobhan but i can read here and in other places, a lot of bad things about her. Why ? jealously ? she's a very beautiful woman (an ugly nose ? what ?) and a former model.
Is there someone here who really knows her ?
Have a nice day !
Big kisses from France!
Its not confirmed they broke up but the fact that he 'dropped' off a dark haired woman in LA doesnt sound like Siobhan for some reason considering she lives in NY. Its funny that they've gone from been seen together almost every weekend to virtually nothing... Perhaps it is a desire for more privacy, but something's not clicking for me. Darla Gordon is also dark haired and shes from LA , so is a vet or nurse he casually sees on and off. so who Knows, .. we havent seen Siobhan after he was seen with Darla a few weeks back ... and hes been to a few public events the last week or so and no Siobhan on his arm and before Darla she went everywhere with him ...NY, LA, London and South Africa,.. so to me it strange that shes suddenly vanished from sight... but Im waiting to see if she appears with him again..
Kiefer is unable to stay with just one woman for long. He lives in a world where temptation is just too great with women throwing themselves at him...I dont believe hes seeing just one woman. I bet he has a well used little black book!
ok thanks for your answer Amanda ...it's true that he has been to a few public events without her... those last weeks.
I heard that she and Kiefer have moved in together in NYC. Anyone else hear that or have information? I heard a place in the West Village.
It's not Kiefer who is moving on, but his ex-wife Kelly. She is clocking out and selling everything to get her 1/2 of the money due her after being in a NO sex marriage for 12 yrs. She needs to clock out because people are now picking up on his gay activities/she wants the money promised to her/He was getting too careless/If the truth does get out she will not get her big pay off. Her 2 boys are getting older, she needs to move on.
Kiefer has not renewed his contract for 24/They want to see how his movie goes/24/his career may be over.Stop being in denial people. Rocco is KS love. The studio was for him. He just goes to NYC to see his daughter/SB is a friend who also might be gay/he gets beauty products from her. The vet girl Janet takes care of his animals/Darla Gordon is related to Howard Gordon they are friends. Its not hard for KS to get a girl for a event or two when he needs them. His career will be over if this gets out/his people will deny it or cover for him. After all, they will be out of work too. Look at his Pics, he is happier kissing a guy in public then a girl. No emotions with BS at all. Kiefer does seem like a nice guy but alot of gays are.
Kiefer has not been with any woman or lived with one since he met Rocco in 2002. He has gone to events with his agent or bodyguard. The other woman he is seen with are to stupid to get it. He uses them, maybe SB too(like you said she could be gay).
The Studio Cave was also built in 2002. He follows Rocco all over the world. I bet they enjoyed that hot tub together at the studio. Kiefer has enough money now to build Rocco a bigger one. He showers Rocco with more affection then he did walking SB across the street.
My guy would hold my hand or put his arm on my back.
Watch "I Trust You To Kill Me" DVD to figure it out for yourselves. Kiefer's tatoo should read "I Trust You To Love Me" Rocco.
Now that I'm thinking of all of this, was Kiefer in a relationship with that rodeo guy John English. He and Kelly broke up at that time. Maybe she found out he was gay then. Lots of gay people have children. I WONDER! I WONDER! It can be true. Does anyone else Wonder?
OH! Veronique..Who would be jealous of SB, NO one! If you said Carrie Underwood or Angelina now that's someone to be jealous of. If SB modeled it was when she was very young and looks change as you get older and not all models are beautifully. SB is just a ordinary person and I know many who are more attracted and have wonderful careers. Millions of models are out there. She is a nobody compared to Kiefer. XOXO right back to you love!
Post by: Ann
Anomoynous - Kiefer lives in LA where he is currently busy shooting 24. She lives in NY. Not to say that she cant move to LA but she has a career in NY. I think Kiefer does have an apartment in the West Village when he stays in NY. But I dont think he'll move there permantly.
yes, i think too if she is living in his appart now. Why put the Kiefer address on 411.com ? She would be so stupid !? i don't think so.
Im not sure about Siobhan either? I mean I have nothing against her. I dont know her to do so. But with Kiefer they never really looked 'together' when the y are together. You would think if You had a new girlfriend you would hold her hand as you walk down the street or show some kind of affection. I dont see that with them. The body language shows them more like friends than anything else. Ive seen pics of Kiefer showing more affection in public with other woman than he has with Siobhan.
It certainly is odd. Its been over a month since she was last seen with Kiefer. He took Michael as his date to The Espy awards!.
One would at least think of seeing her out to dinner or lunch with Kiefer in all this time. We can only guess if they're still together or not, but only time will tell.
I dont think shes Gay! She likes Men with Money!.. but he could Bi sexual.. I heard he once tried to Kiss a man in a bar when he was drunk and the guy shoved him away.
Maybe with Siobhan, hes realized the lack of spark between them ( at least that how it seems in pics of them) and moved on.
Looks like Kiefer's Ex-wife Kelly is calling the shots now and threw KS out on his ass from the Studio. The man is a cheater! He cheated on his 1st wife (Sarah mother) with Julia Roberts, then cheats on Julia with a bar dancer, then he cheats on his 2nd wife with this woman from NY in July 07 and then went public with this woman from NY who walks the streets dressed like a hooker after he gets out of Jail. How embarrassing for Kelly & her 2 boys & daughter. KS should not be around children, he sets a very bad example. Not a very good father Role Model for any Kid. Glad she finally divorced him & is taking him to the cleaners for her half.
KS will probably stay in LA working to keep the next woman or man (maybe Rocco) in his life. Its in his nature to cheat and you can not change a person nature or if he is gay.
Andy Dick likes it both ways (his proud to tell everyone) and he is friends with Kiefer Sutherland. I could believe KS also likes it both ways. He really does like Rocco. FREAKY
Kiefer has been seen with a woman in LA last week in West Hollywood. No pics but she could be Siobhan, the man who saw her describes her as "gorgeous" and there's also a sighting with a dark haired woman from Saturday.
Difficult to know... After all she was with him in Africa, and we have no pics.
Tara, do you have any other info about this relationship ? thanks in advance.
What woman in West Hollywood? I didn't see that anywhere. I only saw that some bikers saw him with a dark haired woman on Sunset Blvd. on Saturday.
Some guy spotted Kiefer with a Hottie, Shorter, brown hair woman, more up top, a month ago in scrubs at a Burger place on Balboa St. He said it was not the one from NY. The biker could mean Janet the Vet. She must be the Hottie. Also other guys described her as a hottie before.
No guy would ever describe SB as gorgeous, she is old enough to be there mother & way to old for guys to call a hottie.
Has to be the vet. Would love to see some pics of her but people said she does not like the spot light and Kiefer really cared alot for her before he went to jail. Both have a love for horses. Kiefer must be back with her again.
Thanks, I had not heard about the Balboa St sighting.Do you remember where you read that? As for the vet, I thought she was supposed to be a rather busty woman, and the biker guy I think said the hottie was small chested. I have a really hard time thinking Siobhan could be the one the bikers saw. According to their description she had a very thin see through top on and they could clearly see her nipples. I know Siobhan has gone braless in the past, but never where you could actually see her breasts. I am having a hard time envisioning Kiefer dropping her off dressed like that on Sunset Blvd with a mob of bikers watching her. Seems an odd way to behave with the woman you supposedly love. But hey, what do I know? Maybe that's how things are done these days. Boy am I out of the loop! haha
Yes and the vet lives in West Hollywood near where Kiefer works on 24. And I heard the same thing about this guy calling her a hottie at a Chili Dog Place. She was seen a lot of times early last summer with Kiefer. Heard that he wanted to marry her but she stopped seeing him because of his drinking. She also wouldn't go to any of the events with him.
Your right, no guy would call SB a hottie and she does not have that sex appeal that guys go for, she is too old & hard looking.
Must be the Vet or someone else!
Posted by: Tina
the sighting on Balboa was more than one month ago ... the one from west hollywood is from a guy, Tim Vincent, he saw them in a shopping center.(source : Sky magazine).
Tina's "the vet lives in West Hollywood near where Kiefer works on 24" sums up the likely truth of any of this "information".
24 doesn't shoot in West Hollywood.
You people don't know what's up with Kiefer's personal life no matter how much you wish you did.
Rumors.. Kiefer is selling everything to pay his ex-wife 1/2 her share and he is moving things to his ranch that he kept.
No. Kiefer and Kelly were separated for almost 9 years. He's made fistfuls of money *and* purchased IW (through a trust at that) since then. His recent assets, including IW, aren't part of their "community property."
As for where he's moving, I have no idea, but it's not to his once upon a time ranch. It was sold right before he and Kelly first separated in 1999 (which I'm pretty sure means that proceeds from that sale would've been part of their community property and so she was entitled to half of that). That sale is a part of the public record (and is mentioned in the articles about IW being for sale).
Yes, they separated in 1999 and sold the house in Hancock Park, the ranch they sub-divided into 2 and KS kept his half. She bought a house in Canada & Kiefer bought one just around the corner from her because he wanted to get back together. He reproposed to Kelly Thanksgiving 2001, they sold both homes in Canada and moved to Beverly Hills, he brought the Studio in 2002 and the house in Sherman Oaks 2003. She had him file for a divorce in 2004 because he cheated on her again with his drinking but he never went through with anything. He was only worth 3.5 M in 04. They sold the home in Beverly Hills, she bought the house in Toluca Lake. He lived at the other places, they shared the ranch for her horses too. He might have mills./he puts alot of mills out too. They had an on again & off again relationship after that. She is the one who SENT him the divorce papers Oct. 2007 after he got his 2nd DUI. She pulled the plug on him this time. Maybe for business reasons who knows, but it is not because of SB. I do know they still care for one another. Kiefer just has a bad problem. In Ca. the law is she gets 1/2 after 10 yrs. and for cheating maybe more. She had a good lawyer.
wow !! So, Kiefer was with Catherine Bisson, a sort of an on-off relationship from 2002 to the end of 2007 and with Kelly in the same time. And during this time, he had been seen with other women like Tricia, Reiko or the Golf one.
You mean Kelly is a very comprehensive wife and she have shared her husband with Catherine...or those women.
About Siobhan, you can't say it's over with her cause that's you want. Maybe, he has strong feelings for her and who knows time will tell.
Because, he doesn't smile on the pictures with her, he is sad...If he's not fine with her why does he stay with her?
I mean kiefer is not the kind of man to waste his time with a woman he doesn't like... There are so many women who would like to be with him, so he has too much to choose from...
When he was with Catherine, people were not very nice too...She is "anorexic", "ugly", "not smiling" bla bla ...Now, it's Siobhan's tour...
Sorry, it's Siobhan 's turn.
Anonymous, you've alllmost (but not quite) done a good job of pulling together publicly available information to develop what alllmost (but not quite) scans as a believable story about Kiefer and Kelly's history.
But... no.
Unlike you, I don't claim to know details of the ins and outs of Kiefer and Kelly's entire history, but your tale is fraught with factual errors and/or your own misinterpretations of the publicly available information you've used to construct it.
The speculative part I would tend to agree with is that Kiefer and Kelly certainly may still care about one another - in the way that people who loved one another very much at one time do - and that, whatever else has gone on between them, his drinking and associated unfaithfulness very likely may've been what made it impossible for them to make a go of it.
But, by MUCH available evidence, the realization that they weren't going to work as a couple happened for them quite some time ago.
In terms of things that I can speak to with factual authority (as opposed to in any way speculating about)... no, you don't "get half in California after 10 years." The community property law kicks in on the first day of marriage, BUT it also ends at the point of legal separation.
My signature isn't showing up in the post above (as sometimes happens on this site)... so, in case, it never does... that was me, Christy.
I think it's safe to say that most people posting here (including myself) know nothing for certain about Kiefer's lovelife. But, I am sure it's possible that there may be someone who has posted here who has some inside knowledge. There's just no way for any of us to know exactly who that may be. So, in light of that, can't we all just agree that most of us are sure about very little? LOL
As for Ms Siobhan, my gut feeling is that he is not with her anymore. Even though there may be inconsistancies about the various sightings, clearly something is happening that wasn't happening 3 months ago. We have literally no word or pics of them together in over a month now, and all of a sudden he is being sighted with various women. Regardless of what he may or may not be doing with them, it is different than what was happening from April thru June. Just something to chew on.
It's certainly possible that there may be people posting here with actual "inside" information.
However, when people post as if they have inside information and, in the very same posts, make errors about and/or misinterpretations of publicly available information, they throw everything else they've said in their posts into a questionable light. If they truly know inside information and wish to convey it in a way that discerning readers are likely to believe, they'd probably do well to avoid easily identifiable factual errors, wouldn't you agree? :)
As for Kiefer and Siobhan, I have no idea... and, as you say, that's true of the vast majority of folks here, I'm sure! It's certainly true that there hasn't been a photograph of them together since late June. That said, he's been working in each of the weekends during that period (well, except the July 4th weekend, when he wasn't spotted anywhere, so far as I've read anyway).
So, who knows... but time, as is its way, no doubt will tell. :)
Stop getting so excited Christy. The post was about Kiefer's relationship with Kelly and their divorce settlement. SB had nothing to do with why KS & Kelly got divorced. You are the one to bring SB up all the time. We DO NOT care about her. She is just another girlfriend, like Catherine, Tricia, Janet, Jennifer etc:
KS did go with Catherine Bisson but stop seeing her and went back to Kelly. He did repropose to her in 2001 Thanksgiving. Check out the Photo's with him with his wedding band on. It was in the news paper in Canada when they were selling there houses. He just never follow through with his divorce in 04 & it really is not any of your bussiness. He & Kelly had on/off relationship. He & Kelly loved one another, she knows all Kiefer's secrets, they were best friends & he was always working on his marriage. He was with Kelly again in April 07. Stop putting their marriage down. Kiefer was the one with the problem not Kelly. He would be the first to say that. Kelly was the one who had enough & pulled the plug when he got his 2nd DUI. We were always hoping the best for them.
I stand by what I said!!!
You say like a very greedy person Christy claiming Kiefer has fistful of money. When he bought the Studio in 02 and of 04 he had 3.5M to his name and that is not alot for an actor. He has 2 ex-wives to support/a daughter/her education/her career. Now a divorce settlement. He brings in Millions but Millions go out in his world. If his career fails his money can very easy disappear too. Is that all you care about??
His biggest worry is his career because he is not getting any younger. He is also thinking of his daughters career because she might graduate this coming year. He is in NY probably to help her with her internship, he does have a Production Company to help her. SB is the last thing on Kiefer's mind. Theirs more to Kiefer then his girlfriends. Kiefer will be in Pocono,Pa for the Races Aug. 3 & 1:00 ESPN Nascar Racing serving as Grand Marshal "Gentlemen Start Your Engines"
Ah, Anonymous, I think it's you who's getting excited. :)
(The posts timestamped 2:35pm and 2:38pm aren't from me and anyone who took the time to observe the difference between one person's writing style and another person's writing style easily could see that. The ones timestamped 3:02pm, 3:05pm and 3:57pm are from me.)
In any case, anyone reading what I've actually posted knows that I didn't say anything negative about Kelly and that, in fact, I've never said anything about Siobhan other than that I don't know her (and, so, can't judge her) and that I don't know what is or isn't going on between her and Kiefer.
The rest of your ranting is incoherent and demonstrates an inability to successfully interpret publicly available information (which it's clear from your posts is all you have access to).
p.s. If you can point me to a photo of Kiefer wearing a wedding ring in real life (that is, not as Jack Bauer) in 2001, please do. Thanks.
Sorry Christy I thought it was you going on about SB & his money because the post all came together at the same time. Show me papers where they were legally separated. People reported that they were because they were not living together. He dropped Catherine/went back to Canada/bought the house around the corner,to get back with Kelly. It is in the Canada news paper/on BBenny web site 2001. He proposed when he took Kelly on a Romance holiday to Las Vegas at Thanksgiving time 01 or 02. He is wearing a ring on some web sites and at the Golden Globes and IT'S NOT A JACK BAUCER MOMENT, don't no exact year. They were also in Romania together when he was doing MIRRORS. Kelly was Kiefer's Rock. Whenever he messed up, she would pick him up & put him back on that rock again. He never had anyone else he could trust but her. It seems like Catherine and Tricia did not mine sharing either. Do not believe everything you read about his lovelife. Kelly did a lot for Kiefer, even when they were not together. You don't hear Kiefer complaining about the settlement. She also has Kelly Sutherland on the Studio email. Seems Kiefer does not mine her still using his last name. Usually when Keifer disappears he is with Kelly. Sorry, but I was always hoping for a Fairy Tale Ending for them. It's not over yet!!
Fairy Tale, you mean FAIRY! I'm still going with the assumption that kiefer Sutherland is gay and his wife waited for the big pay off because it would seem he had no money in 2004. The woman are just a FRONT. no woman would put up with the shit he has done, she was in it for the MONEY. Find Rocco and you will find Kief hiding.
Kiefer is SCAREY!! Saw Pics of Kiefer's Iron Works.
Who needs MIRRORS when their are self Images of himself all over that place.
No wife-No daughter, just himself.
NO MIRRORS in his house, who is he kidding: Their's a MIRROR bigger then life, right across from the tub.
Guy is not into looking at any girls... he's to busy loving himself & likes doing it in private.
Does he actually sleep with all these girls? You have PROOF!!!
Get over him girls. HE IS GAY & A LIAR!
CREEPY KIEFER....
Y'know, Anonymous Poster Who "Hates" Kiefer, just because he didn't want you doesn't mean he doesn't want any woman. Just sayin'. Also... protest too much much? ;)
Anonymous Poster Who Wants Kelly & Kiefer To Be Together - you're clearly very invested in that (now officially over) relationship and that's fine. I'm certainly not going to argue with you that you shouldn't want them to be together some day (even as I very much doubt that's ever going to happen), but just wanted to say... that ring that you're referring to isn't his wedding ring. That's a signet-like ring that he's worn off and on for many years. (You can get a really good look at it in the movie The Cowboy Way.) I have never seen a photograph of him wearing a wedding ring (as himself rather than a character) in all the years since he and Kelly first separated.
Oops, that last post was me. Forgot to sign it before posting.
Kiefer & Kelly were married in Canada. They separated in 1999 but not legally. He dumped Catherine B & went back to win Kelly over & bought a house around the corner in Canada. She wouldn't take him back unless he stopped drinking. At Thanksgiving he took her on a Romance Holiday to Las Vegas & repropose to her. In Jan/Feb he was on the Ryan Seacrest Show(not E).It was cute because he had his ring on & was turning it & twisting it, playing with it with a big smile on his face. He looked like a kid with a new toy. In 04 he didn't file for a divorce(that was about something else).Kiefer never ever said he was divorced. When he got his DUI in 04, Kelly broke up with him. Kiefer said, What woman(wife) wants to be with him when he acts like an asshole when he is drinking. He was back & forward with CB & Tricia after that but his drinking was getting bad so they filed for a divorce in 06. In 07 Kiefer wanted to try again with Kelly before the divorce went through (Mar-June together). Kelly called it quicks in June. After that he was
drinking/partying bad & got his DUI in Sept 07. The divorce was almost final but they held off because of him going to jail(for the kids with the Press). He went to jail at xmas when the kids had school break. When he got out they were going to announce the divorce when the kids got done school for the summer but someone informed the Press before that could happen. Someone let the Cat out of the Bag. I'm only telling everyone this because all of you are assumming it was because of SB & Kiefer wanting to get marry again. So untrue,as you found out. Kiefer didn't know SB at the time in 06. Don't care if you believe me or not. Kelly is still Kiefer's Rock. JMW
Got cut off...Kelly is still Kiefer's Rock. JMW
I honestly don't think that *anyone* is thinking that Kelly and Kiefer didn't get back together because of Siobhan.
Beyond that, you've created quite a story around your desire for Kiefer & Kelly to be together forever and, if that's what you want to do, okay.
(One thing I would say... "rocks" don't leave people at their lowest points, which is what your story purports that Kelly does. To be clear, I don't believe that's what she does; that is to say, I don't claim to know what she does. But that's kind of a weak point in your fantasy.)
But he wasn't wearing his wedding ring on Seacrest. He was wearing the signet ring. They're not the same ring.
JMW, it would seem that your facts are incredible. Thanks for the input.
Fact: Not every man wears his wedding ring.
He is wearing his ring on LEFT hand in photos and fits time frame.
I'm glad Kiefer & Kelly had some romantic times. Sounds to me that Kiefer was at his worst when he and Kelly would split up. I'm sure Kelly tried in the 12 years they were married to keep KS from drinking. She had a tough marriage. Glad to hear they were looking out for the kids.
It would seem that some people INTENTIONLY misinterprets a story when it suits them. Look at Pam and Tommy Lee's ex-marriages. I'm sure Kelly will still be there for Kiefer. It's a 14 year history with her and her 2 sons that Kiefer loves and help to raise.
Fact: Married for 12 years in Hollywood years, is like FOREVER!!
People are entitled to their fantasies, we all have them.
I'm very sure Christy has hers!!!!
Ginny, yes, everyone is entitled to his/her fantasy. Can I ask you to point me to the place where I said that JMW isn't entitled to hers. In fact, I said more than once that she is. (So, would this be a case of someone - specifically, you - interpreting facts to suit you?)
Kiefer had a wedding ring that he wore when he and Kelly were married. He also has a signet ring that he's worn through the years (beginning before he even met Kelly). My point isn't that "all married men wear wedding rings"; of course, you're correct that they don't. My point is that, if Kiefer were going to wear a ring because he and Kelly were officially back together at some point, don't you think he would've worn his his wedding ring... not a different ring? And he always wore the signet ring on his wedding ring finger, even when he wasn't married and before he met Kelly.
Also, can you point out the place where I said that I don't think that Kelly and Kiefer will be in one another's lives probably for the rest of their lives or that they don't care about one another... and mutually care about the boys? (You won't be able to find it because I didn't say it. I think that they will always be a part of one another's lives one way or another.)
All of that aside, many of JMW's "facts" are verifiably incorrect. There's nothing wrong with having a fantasy, but that's what her story about Kiefer & Kelly through the years is.
JMW you are so smart. I get the point that you were making.
Kiefer's PR's used SB as an scapegoat. SB and Kiefer were walking the streets of NYC getting pics done, when the news broke of his divorce, to draw the Press away from Kelly and the Kids in LA.
Kiefer has smart people working for him. Very Smart!! He always did protect the ones he loves.
I wonder who let the Cat out of the Bags???
No one "let the cat out of the bag." The divorce decree was filed publicly (as they are) and TMZ picked it up. Period. There was nothing more mysterious (or interesting) about it than that.
What I'd like to know is in what decade you people are living in which a divorce is such an overwhelmingly big deal that anyone needs to be "protected" from it? Kiefer and Kelly were married. They separated a long time ago (which isn't to say that they may not have tried to get back together at some point after they first separated) and, for whatever reason(s), they finally finalized the divorce this spring.
A divorce (in Hollywood or otherwise) isn't hugegantic news and there was absolutely no need to "draw the press away" from Kelly and the boys. The press cares about the celebrity him or herself; they weren't going to "go after" Kelly or the boys because Kiefer and Kelly's divorce *finally* was finalized. There was nothing to "protect" them from.
Aside from the press, do you honestly think that the boys, well aware that their mom and Kiefer have been separated now for longer than they were together, were "shocked" that they finally divorced? If so, y'all need to buy yourselves tickets to the real world. Truly!
just wondering, are he and the fashion chick still together? haven't seen or heard anything in awhile.
This is a subject thats been going on for sometime now. No one truly knows the answers to whats going on in Kiefers personal life. so lets just see what happens. One thing is certain Kiefer has just set up his own MySpace page! WOW!!
i'm guessing (ok, hoping haha) she's history. That one gives me the creeps.
It just seems so wierd that for 3 months from April 1st through June 29th or so we saw so many pictures it almost seemed odd to me and now nothing.
Doesn't mean they aren't together just seems strange.
Who knows, maybe Kiefer just wanted them to go "under the radar" as far as she was concerned as the coverage got too much for them. Although I have to admit it sure seemed like either Kiefer or Siobhan were tipping off the paps with all the sightings including her only visit during that time period to LA (very strange, to me anyway).
Well, I am sorta with JMW wishing Kelly were back in the picture. I have never been a fan of Siobhan's. Don't trust her and didn't put it past her to tip off the paps or leak stuff to the press. Notice for whatever reason all of it has stopped even the blurbs about how wonderful she was for him and how much she changed him.
Agree with Natasha, we will have to wait and see what happens but just curious.
One additional comment with regard to the 1999 separation and maybe Christy can answer but I thought it was a legal and binding separation. I mean all of that is public record and I also thought and again looking to Christy or someone for help but I thought Kiefer did in some interviews say he was divorced but maybe my memory is not working so well so I am looking for help.
Maybe Kiefer took one look at her in the Apple store a month or so ago; eyes bugging out and nostrils flaring ..and he ran for the hills! Who could blame him?????
Anonymous, you're correct that Kiefer and Kelly legally separated in 1999. The date was on the divorce papers that were publicly leaked the second time that they filed for divorce in 2004. So, while that separation wasn't an "official divorce", it did end their community property state.
I can't remember if Kiefer ever used the word "divorced" to describe himself in the years between their separation and eventual divorce (though certainly it was incorrectly reported that he was divorced many times), but he did refer to himself as single. The only time that he didn't was when he denied the rumor that he was engaged to Catherine by saying, "It would be difficult for me to be engaged because I'm still married." That was over Thanksgiving 2002 and he did go to Las Vegas with Kelly that weekend. (I think that's where LMW gets the "romance weekend/reproposal" part of the story from... and, clearly, they were together that weekend... for whatever reason(s)).
Totally agree that, unless and until there's any new information, we can't have a clue as to whether or not Kiefer and Siobhan still are together... but just wanted to add that, though there were many sets of photographs of them together, there weren't multiple blurbs about their relationship.
There was the *single* (truly... single), very clearly tabloid-created blurb, citing unnamed sources, about how good she was for him. That particular tabloid story is a staple for ANY celebrity who starts being seen with someone after he/she has had a bad incident of some kind. Truly, I think it's a template and they just fill in the blanks with the names and a few specific to the couple details.
That *single* standard tabloid-created blurb was picked up by multiple celebrity "news" sources. But it always was the very.same.item. In some cases, it was slightly reworded (because that's what these sources do), but it always was clearly traceable to that single source.
Then, when she appeared wearing a ring (for whatever reason), that single original item was updated with the speculation that they were engaged. Which, again, is absolutely commonplace when a female celebrity or a male celebrity's girlfriend wears a ring on the ring finger of her left hand.
But, again, it all came from the same original tabloid source.
The idea that there was a rush of stories coming out never was accurate. That was just celebrity "news" making its usual rounds and, for now, whether or not Kiefer and Siobhan have run their course (and who knows?), the "news" of the newness of their relationship has run its course... unless/until it really does officially go to another level.
Well, heck, that got cutoff *way* earlier than I thought it was going to. :) The rest just said that there was a single tabloid-created blurb (and a very standard tabloid-created blurb) that got picked up by multiple sources. And then that the same blurb got picked up and "updated" to say they were engaged when she was photographed wearing a ring on her ring finger. (Another very standard tabloid "story".)
But the idea that there were *multiple* stories about how she was good for him/had changed is life isn't accurate. There was a single, standard - almost 100% likely to have been made-up - tabloid "story" that got picked up by multiple sites/mags.
And there really is a difference between there being a single blurb picked up by multiple sources and there being multiple blurbs.
For now, whether or not they've actually run their course (and who knows?), they're not fresh "news"... unless/until something new really does happen in their relationship (if it even exists still). :)
Of Course the children knew about the divorce, they just did not want them in school so they would not be questioned by so-called-friends. Any parent would be conscious of there feelings & all of this with the Press was a caution step for Kelly. Kiefer kept Kelly & children in the background so people would not make a target out of them like the other so-called-girlfriends. Kiefer and his family are not just anybody. I see now, how much he always wanted to protected that part of his life.
If Kiefer said that he was divorce in a interview his children would know it was a lie. People can twist things all they like but Lets face it.. He had years to divorce her but why didn't he? There had to be something going on between them. Hopefully it was love!
There are pics of Kiefer & Kelly(K&K) on the set of 24 & them in Las Vegas together. Pics of them at the Walk of Fame in 07 & in a Romanian article or Mag. about them being in Romania together. So maybe there is something to what JMW said. Interesting info that I had no idea about with K&K.
Every thing about SB & Kiefer pics were strange to me too. Out of character for Kiefer. So maybe they did use SB as an scapegoat.
They were NEVER legally separated in 1999. They NEVER legally filed for a divorce in 2004. I said "04 was about something else".
Don't know what papers you are reading Christy, maybe something out of a trash can or the internet.
Your making everything about Kelly & Kiefer relationship sound insignificant. He would have your head for that. Its the one thing Kiefer tried so hard at, to love and protect HIS family. It's hugegantic news because this is HIS family involved, not yours. You don't live in HIS World.
Thanks to some people who feel Kiefer's & Kelly's relationship was significant. JMW
I put this out there, so some people would stop assuming, the divorce was about SB & Kiefer getting married.
Regarding the boys and the divorce... they're teenage boys going to school in Los Angeles, California in the year 2008. Chances are that half or more of their classmates have divorced parents. Many of them probably have mothers and/or fathers who've been divorced more than once.
The idea that the divorce was big news is incorrect. It wasn't. TMZ's headline was "Kiefer Sutherland's Divorce is Final. Who Knew That It Wasn't?" or something like that and, though it got a fair run around the internet and other news sources, that was about the gist of all the "coverage." The idea that kids at the boys' school cared about it one way or another is frankly absurd.
Who knows why they didn't divorce until now and, as I've said many times, I do believe that they likely will continue to be part of one another's lives in some ways... in the way that people who've cared about one another and about their kids sometimes are even after they break up (which K&K did a long time ago even if they did try at different points to reconcile).
But, doesn't your "hopefully it was love!" dream kind of breakdown around the point where they did, in fact, finally divorce. If you want to hope for their everlasting love (which is, of course, your right), now seems like the least likely time to be hoping for it... given that now, after all these years of being separated, they ARE divorced.
Everything JMW "knows" about K&K is public, whether or not she's interpreting it correctly. I (and many others) knew that Kelly and the boys were present at at least one 24 location shoot (and probably others; if I were Kiefer, I might invite my kids to come watch shooting sometimes too). Also well-known was that K&K were in Vegas together around Thanksgiving of 2002, that Kelly was rumored to have been sighted (but there are no photos) in Romania and that she was at Forest Whitaker's Walk of Fame ceremony with Kiefer in 2007. Guess what? Kelly (along with Kiefer) was a neighbor of Forest's at one point.
No one ever said that K&K aren't friends.
Forest Whitaker's Walk of Fame ceremony with Kiefer in 2007. Guess what? K&K were neighbors of Forest's at one point. Could it be that they're all... friends? ;)
Did JMW 'know" that Kelly also is thanked in the acknowledgements for the wonderful photo of Kiefer, Sarah, Michelle and Hamish in the "Hollywood Dad's" book and/or that Timothy accompanied Kiefer to the SAG awards in 2006?
If she did, I'm surprised that those facts weren't woven into her story too.
No one, including me, ever said that K&K have nothing to do with one another. They clearly have had interactions with one another's lives through all the years they've been separated. Nevertheless, they didn't get back together. Rather, they got divorced. And, personally, I just wish both of them well.
Anonymous, yes, they were legally separated in 1999. I read it on the second set of divorce papers (which, yes, were divorce papers... no matter what you say) that were made public in 2004.
What "something else" are you thinking that those papers, publicly filed as divorce papers, were about?
I can't imagine where you're getting that I make everything about Kiefer and Kelly's relationship sound "trivial." I've said, many times now, that I don't doubt that they'll continue to care about one another in the way that people who've loved one another do.
That they were a cohesive family all through the years they were separated, however, is verifiably a fantasy on your part. But, hey, you're entitled to your fantasy.
I found K&K house in Sherman Oaks on the internet google map and in the backyard in a HEART shape pool. Kiefer probably had it built for Kelly because it was purchase in 2003 just like someone on this site said. Who else would Kiefer have the pool built for with the kids going there and all. OH MY GOD how romantic is that.
I believe the person (JMW) who said they had a romantic holiday in LV in 2002 & Kiefer repropose. I wonder if Romania was just as romantic.
Kiefer does have the ring on his ring finger in the pics. Who cares about the one he had when they first married, married people change rings all the time, but people who are married always wear them on the left. He knows better.
I also beleive now, that Kiefer did not want to expose Kelly to the public and wanted to keep her all to himself. Jesus again how Romantic!!
I feel so bad that they are divorced because of his drinking. KS could have divorced her and married Catherine, Tricia or whomever the hell he wanted but he stayed hoping for Kelly. Shit, I'm tired but I'm going to say it again maybe because I'm in a Romantic mood but "HOW ROMANTIC".
JMW this is for you..Through the good times and the bad times their marriage was not insignificant. A lot of love there & we only picked up on a few romantic things. It wasn't all about his drinking problems. Best to K&K!!
SHUT UP CHRISTY! YOU GO ON & ON!
WE KNOW ALL THE SAME SHIT AS YOU DO! JMW DID NOT WANT TO REVEAL ALL THAT STUFF. IT WAS NOT IMPORTANT FOR HER TO GET HER POINT ACROSS.
YOUR JUST PISSED BECAUSE SHE KNEW IT AND YOU HAD TO LOOK IT UP. I HAVE TONS OF INFO ON KIEFER AND THERE WAS NEVER ANY PUBLIC RECORDS OF THEM FILING FOR A DIVORCE IN 2004. LIKE JMW SAID, 2004 WAS ABOUT SOMETHING ELSE AND I HAVE THAT INFORMATION. TOO BAD YOU DON'T!
YOU NEED TO CATCH UP. JMW WAS RIGHT ON!
YOU ARE SCREWING WITH THERE MARRIAGE AND MAKING IT LOOK INSIGNIFICANT ESPECIALLY REGARDING THE BOYS.
IT WOULD SEEM THE INFO YOU REALLY WANT IS REGARDING WHETHER KELLY GOT 1/2 KIEFER'S MONEY. THAT IS WHY YOU KEEP BRING UP THE SEPARATION AND 04 PAPERS. YOU ARE A GREED BITCH. ARE YOU SB? LOOKING FOR INFORMATION THAT YOU CAN NOT FIND!
SEEMS TO ME THE DIVORCE WAS A SECRET IN 06. THE PAPERS DIDN'T JUST FALL INTO TMZ LAP. SB IS PROBABLY THE ONE WHO LET THE SECRET OUT.
Christy, that was me Linda asking about the '99 separation. I thought it was a legal / binding one and thanks for clarifying.
As for Kiefer and Kelly (and you know from my posts on the other board the sympathy I felt for Kelly once the divorce was final) I am unsure of them getting back together as well since they did finally cement the divorce even though it is not impossible.
And while I am in no way judging Kelly I find it hard to believe that she would serve Kiefer divorce papers on the heels of that devastating DUI arrest. I understand "tough love" and all but still think she would have waited until he got out of jail at the very least.
Also, while I don't doubt anybody on this board really knowing Kelly and even Kiefer the thought that the problems between them were ONLY about his drinking is also hard to believe. I don't care how real or unreal ALL those ladies were it seems hard to imagine that that also was not an overriding cause for their problems. I mean Kiefer himself said so in not so many words in the Playboy 2004 interview that it was the main reason for their breakup not soon after they were married in 1996. Unless Kelly has some kind of Rose Kennedy complex I can't honestly believe that a woman would sit by with all of that going on and those are only the public ladies. There were others along the way as well, you know the one night stands and all and I do realize that much of this was due to his drinking issues but he wasn't drunk with Catherine, Tricia, Janet, Jennifer and Siobhan and probably others. His drunken excursions would only apply to the one night stands and others....
As for the 2004 papers I can't imagine what else they could be for. I mean they are public record unless cause he is a celebrity he could lie. If that is the case then seal the records. Kiefer did have his DUI in 2004 but that is also public record. One question I do have on the divorce finalized in May '08 I thought the reports (which could be wrong) stated that Kiefer filed. It is easier for me to believe that Kelly is the filer along the way and not Kiefer so maybe that is incorrect or I am reading the info incorrectly.
There is no doubt Kiefer loves Kelly and feels responsibility towards her but I am unsure it is anything else. Why would he choose to spend '05 Christmas with Rocco DeLucca and '06 Christmas with Catherine Bisson. I am sure if he asked Kelly she would have said spend those holidays with me and maybe she even did ask and he declined because he doesn't do the "family" thing.
I would ask JMW that while we already knew that Kiefer took Kelly to Romania with him, why did it go nowhere and Kiefer go crazy with drink and women shortly thereafter. Wouldn't they both have tried to wait til he got back to LA. Wouldn't Kelly at least given it that go. IMHO, this meant to me that they did try one LAST go and found that they were not going to make it work either because the "magic" in their relationship was gone or Kelly was convinced Kiefer wouldn't stop drinking even though it didn't appear he was drinking while she was with him in Romania.
And lastly, with Kiefer getting out of jail and seemingly not drinking at all or nearly as much wouldn't Kelly have waited this period out since she waited this long or did she feel she had to do this to send Kiefer a message.
While I am not a fan of Siobhan, some of you are making me have sympathy for her when you say Kiefer used her. Believe me, I don't like her and I myself believe she was tipping off the paps and yes, may have even tipped off TMZ or others about the divorce because soon after the marriage rumors (which I also believe she spread) started. But I don't believe for a second that Kiefer used her. I have much more respect for Kiefer than that. I find it imaginable that Kiefer would use anybody for anything. It's not his personality. As for Kiefer protecting Kelly and the "boys" (they are 17 and 15, not kids) he would do that no matter what the relationship status is with Kelly. Just look at how he worried and protected the 24 Krew during the period after his DUI!!
The rest of that sentence was that while I realize much was due to his drinking he was not drunk the whole time or any of the time he was with Tricia, Catherine, Jennifer, Janet and Siobhan.
And why if he felt such a connection to Kelly did he spend '05 Christmas with Rocco DeLuca and '06 Christmas with Catherine Bisson. Don't you think Kelly asked him? Kiefer married Kelly in 1996 and almost from the beginning they never acted like a family. We know that they went to Romania together and I myself thought they would reconcile but it went nowhere. Maybe that is because they realized that there was nothing left. That while he still cared for her, the magic if it were was gone because almost immediately after she left him he went back to booze and women.
Of course Kiefer loves and cares for Kelly and feels responsibility towards her and her sons (they are not "kids" as it were; they are 15 and 17 and able to handle things) but Kiefer cares about everyone in his world just look at how he worried about the 24 Krew after his DUI.
As for Siobhan, I don't like her myself as I feel she may have tipped off the paps and yes, spread the marriage rumors but some of you make me feel sympathy for her when you imply Kiefer used her. I have much more respect for Kiefer than that. I do not believe he would use her or anybody for his own gain. It's just not his personality from what I can tell.
For most of us only time will tell how this plays out. Maybe some of you are closer to the situation and see other things happening that we don't. We'll see.
With regard to my post 1:55 I apologize to everyone as I thought my first post got cut off so I repeated myself and double posted. Please ignore unless you love my posting that much, LOL!!!
Linda
I think all the photos with SB were weird too and now nothing.
I had a great laugh when I read about her being the scapegoat, that I almost sprinkled my computer with my coffee, laughing so hard. Letterman would love this:
WHAT IS SO FUNNY ABOUT SB BEING THE SCAPEGOAT, is that, all the pics of SB and Kiefer started on April 1st, YOU KNOW...APRIL FOOL'S DAY!!!!!!!!
Not only are Kiefer's PR's smart but have a great SENSE OF HUMOR. Kiefer loves being around people like that.
JMW was wishing K&K the best for their separate future, as I will. No 12 years of marriage should be criticized and taking apart by any one. They had problems in their marriage just like any one else.
This is funny too. Please, Please, give me a break, kids are at their WORST as TEENS and they DO NOT know how to handle themselves!!! I wish!! They are horrible!! Do you want my 2 TEENS Linda!
(Laughing)
Thank god they are out fishing with their Dad today. What a great great father like Kiefer. Need to be a parent to understand it!
You are judging K&K by bring up the devastating DUI & his jail time. There were NO divorce papers served at that time, it was in 06 that they secretly filed the divorce. They did wait until he got out of jail, as everyone knows.
So stop judging them and assuming you know their total history.
Playboy is being sued for twisting things around. Mags & tabloids do it all the time. This is where you are getting your info from. GOD FORBID!
Kiefer puts in 15 hr. days and works alot of weekends for the last 7 years & he has lots of time to screw all these woman, party & drink on top of it. What pill is he on?
The relationship with other woman did not work out. Why? Its simple, he did not want them.....
At x-mas in 05 he was promoting Rocco & this was his only time off 24. Japan he was promoting 24. Maybe Kelly, the boys & daughter flew to him. Were you there? In 06 he stayed home in LA for the holidays. Was he with Kelly & the kids? Again were you there?
You have know idea what he had with Kelly. So stop judging them and look at the good things they had together.
Nophia
More for Linda, They lived in Hancock Park as a family. When Kelly left and went back to Canada- Kiefer moved back with them just around the corner until he won Kelly back. Then they moved to a Mansion in Beverly Hills as a family & bought the home in Sherman Oaks. Were you living with them at the time, Sharing their bed?
Your just like Christy, jealous and trying to minimize their relationship and making it look & sound ugly.
Seems to me they had many Romantic times together and they are the things we should remember about their marriage.
It's simple, if Keifer did not like his loveless marriage he had 12 years to get out, but he stayed.
Nophia
Hi Linda. I agree with you that there may be people posting here with personal knowledge about Kiefer and/or Kiefer & Kelly, but I would bet enormous sums of money that the crazed K&K 'shipper isn't one of them. (I use the singular because I'd also bet big money that there's just one person posting. Many posting ids aside, the voice is extraordinarily similar.)
For certain, that person's (or those people's) ability to interpret publicly available info about K&K is about as well-developed as her (or their) ability to interpret other posters' statements. Which is to say, not very. Otherwise, how to explain the endless cries of "you're putting down them and their relationship!" when no one has, y'know, put them or their relationship down? ;)
If I had to guess, I'd say we're dealing with someone who's been "playing Kelly" in her head for many years now and imagining that, whenever Kiefer's not publicly visible, he's "with her." It would seem that her PretendKellySelf is okay with womanizing, but isn't particularly compassionate about drinking... just based on the points in her story when her PretendKellySelf has kicked his imaginary self to the imaginary curb.
There was one thing in your post that I wanted to ask about. You mentioned that we "know" that Kelly was in Romania. Do we know that for sure? What I remember is that someone ran across him and someone she thought was Kelly in a park and there was something about a possible photograph, but I didn't recall ever seeing a photo or reading confirmation that it was her.
I don't think it's impossible that she visited him there for part of the time. I *do* think it's very likely that they've remained friends (and, for all I know, friends with benefits). Just didn't recall a confirmation of that story and do remember several stories of Kiefer being quite alone (with in some cases some apparently hired companionship) in Romania.
the photo or reading confirmation that it was her.
It wouldn't surprise me if she did visit him for part of the time he was there. It seems very likely to me that they have remained friends (and, for all I know, friends with benefits). Just don't recall seeing that confirmed and wonder if I missed it.
What I do recall are a couple of what seemed to me to be fairly well-sourced stories of Kiefer being quite alone (and perhaps sometimes with hired companionship some of the time) in Romania.
Just as a general observation about the "K&K were together all these many years" fantasy...
Isn't it fascinating that, after taking her to many public events through the years prior to their separation, his "romantic" desire to "keep her hidden and all to himself" coincided precisely with the point at which they legally separated in 1999?!
That is, they were photographed together casually more than once through the many years after that (including being very physically affectionate at a party celebrating his Golden Globe win in early 2002 in Canada), they never attended another official event* together once they separated. What a coincidence! :)
Or not.
(* With the exception of Forest Whitaker's Walk of Fame induction which, to me, made perfect sense given that he's someone who'd be friends with both of them.)
Nophia, my understanding all along was that they filed for divorce first in 2004 and then in 2006 and both times didn't finalize for whatever reasons. I believe that's been posted on websites all along so not really a secret. When the divorce was finalized in May '08 I think TMZ reported that the papers were requested to be put through in March or April '08. JMW then came on this site and posted that Kelly sent him his divorce papers in October '07 right after his second DUI. I assumed she might be familiar with the situation and took her word; I have no reason to doubt her.
I have never heard about Kiefer suing Playboy for that article; that's news to me and I actually doubt that claim. I think that would have been reported somewhere, don't you think.
I don't know Kiefer or Kelly and I don't believe you do either. I like you, would be happy to see them together again. I agree with you if you took more time to read my post. I don't know the reasons those relationships, if you will, didn't work out and I don't know that you do either. However, times have changed for Kiefer and he may now be ready to settle down with Siobhan. For all we know she is in LA as we speak and they are seeing each other secretly (it was reported that they did this in February '08) and ready to get married or at least move in together. How would we know otherwise.
What I am trying to say is it is all just speculation if we don't actually know these people and I certainly don't claim to.
BTW, you don't need to tell me about the hours/days Kiefer works. I am a fan of his and certainly understand what he puts into his craft but to believe he never takes off, well I don't know how to answer you on that one.
All I know is we are all just stating our opinions here and don't need to be accused of all sorts of things like jealousy. It's funny but I have been accused of that on other boards for defending Kelly and go after Siobhan.
Just to reiterate, I like Kelly. I understand that she had a very tough and emotional run with Kiefer. I feel Kiefer still cares deeply for her. Whether that translates to them getting together again who knows for sure, not even Kiefer I would be will to bet!!
Christy, I will send you a PM on that other site we both post on with regard to Romania.
Linda, just one correction re: the divorce filing dates...
The first divorce papers were filed in early 2000. iirc (it could be looked up), it was about six months after their legal separation date. Kiefer actually appeared on Entertainment Tonight talking about that filing because an incorrect box got checked on the papers, which indicated that he'd asked for a restraining order against Kelly. There was some ugly publicity about that and Kiefer, who was in Hawaii filming "To End All Wars" at that time, flew back to LA to get it straightened around and appeared on Entertainment Tonight in order to clear up the confusion.
He filed for divorce the second time in 2004. Though TMZ didn't exist yet at that time, those papers were made public too. One of the tabloids even posted the case number, which meant that it was possible to check the status of the case on the LA county courts webpage.
I don't know where the thing about the 2006 filing is coming from, but it's not accurate. The May 16, 2008 final dissolution papers reference the 2004 filing. (And, though I know you didn't say this, just for the record, the papers weren't "leaked" to TMZ. TMZ scours the public record for all kinds of legal stuff related to celebrities and that's how they got it.)
You're absolutely right that it would be public if Kiefer had sued Playboy.
Thanks in advance for the PM.
Thanks in advance for the PM.
Christy, thanks for clarifying the filing dates. I thought there were two and just mixed them up. I remembered and you now bring this up (I was actually going to ask you about it in the PM) about the first filing and a box being checked wrong. They were claiming that Kelly was stalking or something and the press was hounding her even staking out the house to the point where she felt she couldn't go out and take her sons to school (hopefully I am remembering the details correctly here but you get the idea). So the second one was in 2004 and that is the one that has been "standing" I guess is the only way I could put it. My question which has never been clear to me is did Kiefer file for divorce or did Kelly. Also, note that although a very private person when relating only to his relationships, lol (Kiefer seems willing to talk about everything and anything except that subject) he will go public to set the record straight which may indicate he was calling it like it is in that recent engagement denial.
I also seem to remember Kiefer taking Kelly to Vegas for the Stones concert I believe to celebrate her birthday possibly but maybe that is the reference to him reconciling with her which I guess they did.
I was looking over some of the old pics on Kiefer Rocks today and noticed one of Kiefer at an awards show with Holly Hunter. In that pic he does appear to have a wedding band on but I can't be sure; the awards pic is not dated, however.
Yep, you're remembering the correct stuff about the first filing.
Kiefer filed for divorce both times but, when the divorce is generally amicable and one of the parties is a celebrity, I think it's common for the celebrity to do the filing... so I don't think that really means anything one way or another.
Anything coming from Kiefer's (or any celeb's) publicists can be considered truthful... insofar is that the message definitely is the message that the celeb wants to be made public. That it comes from the publicist is kind of like the "Good Housekeeping Stamp of Approval" on a story. :)
Yes, Kiefer and Kelly were at the Stones show in Vegas in November 2002 and, as I recall, it was for her birthday. That also was where he denied the rumor that he was engaged to Catherine by saying, "It would be difficult for me to be engaged since I'm already married." They certainly may've been temporarily reconciled at that point... which was over 5-1/2 years ago. That is to say, it's been a long time since then. :)
That's the 2004 Golden Globes and that's the signet ring, not his wedding ring. (If you look under the "Awards" pics on Kiefer-Rocks, you'll see better shots of the ring than in the pic with Holly.) That's the ring that he was wearing - and on that finger - before he met Kelly. He wears it in the movie "The Cowboy Way." His wedding ring was light metal (probably platinum) and was a simple band. In the other pics on K-Rocks, you clearly can see that this is a signet ring, not a band.
Jesus, is Linda & Christy the same person. Its hard to interpret all the interpreting thats going on over other peoples comments being interpreted by you.
Where have you been Christy/Linda people have already made comments on this site about all the places K&K have been. Its old stuff.
People have already discuss on this site K&K marriage & divorce dates.
People have already mentioned the ring. People have already talked about Christy/Linda's judging K&K marriage and trying to make it look ugly with bringing up old gossip again and again. Kiefer has never air anything bad about his personal life on TV, especially about his family or restraining orders.
Your just DIGGING for what really happen in 04.
Please, catch up to what we all know on this site.
Stop playing guessing games about K&K's married life. Your dates have POOR Kiefer divorcing 3 different times with Kelly. (laughed at that one)!! I think! I think! Its possible! That's possible! Either you know for sure or you don't.
If anyone is playing at a fantasy its Christy?/Linda? in their heads about SB. OMG, did I interpret it right. Maybe you are her and that would make you one sick jealous person.
Seems to me they had many Romantic times together and they are the things we should remember.
Like I said before: It's simple, if Keifer did not like his loveless marriage he had 12 years to get out but he stayed.
Nophia
got cut off...Seems to me they had many Romantic times together and they are the things we should remember about their marriage.
Like I said; Its simple, if Kiefer did not like his loveless marriage he had 12 years to get out, but he stayed.
Nophia
Someone else mention on this site that Christy/Linda could be SB with a multiple personality disorder, if so god help Kiefer, his in alot of trouble.
Her comments sound more like email addressed to Linda, & Linda replying that fast. So strange..........Does Christy/Linda think we are that stupid.
I beleive she was home all day checking out things on the internet,reading trashy tabloid stuff, watching old interveiws and movies, just to inform us about this date & that date. It really is funny in a sick way. Her/Them pretending to know so much about K&K life. She did not know about Romania and other things until JMW informed us. She doesn't know about the RING either!!
She is not a OLD LOYAL FAN of Kiefer's. She dislikes Kelly very much.
I also google the house in Sherman Oaks & thought the Heart Shape Pool was romantic.
Loyal fan to Kiefer & Kelly, hoping things work out for them in the future.
Hoping also that they stay best friends!
Wishing Sarah the best in her acting career in NY. The boys I hope will always have Kiefer in their lifes.
Nophia, no one said that Kiefer divorced Kelly three times. Divorce is a two-part process. Initially, you file and then, at some point later after all parties agree to the terms and decide to go ahead, the divorce is finalized.
Kiefer first filed in early 2000 and then filed again in early 2004. The filing made in early 2004 was then finalized in May of this year.
Hey, Linda!
I was thinking that the site you referenced was the Krew, but no PM yet so just wanted to make sure we were thinking of the same place. Is that correct?
If you just haven't had a change to PM yet, that's totally cool! Just making sure we're on the same page... or, well, site. ;) :)
Neither one of them AGREED to file anything until 2006. In 2007 they got together to see if they could make it but it did not happen. In 07 the divorce would have gone through but Kiefer got his DUI and jail time. They waited until he got out to finish finalizing everything. Know matter what happen, they were married for 12 yr. do the math. Stop being so mean! End of Story!
You are crazy, pretending to be two different people and going on about something that is over & not any bodies business but theirs.
Go see a doctor and get help! God forbid if you are SB. (SB cut short..stands for Son of a Bitch),that's the initials everyone gave her or you.
I'm *so* curious as to where you're getting that I don't like Kelly. I have absolutely nothing against Kelly. I don't know Kelly. If things had worked out for her and Kiefer that would've made me totally happy if it made him/her/them happy.
For whatever reasons, though, their marriage didn't work out... and I'm sure that's a source of sadness for both of them.
And, yes, they were married for just short of 12 years (June 1996 through May 2008). They also were verifiably separated for many many of those years. I don't say that because I don't like Kelly (again, I don't know her) or because I had any particular wish for their marriage to end (I didn't). I just say it because it's true.
That's all. :)
They had many many romantic times together, which were nice. It took me awhile but I found the house in Sherman Oaks and seen the Heart Shape Pool. That might have been a Romantic surprise for her. I thought it was romantic that he went back to Canada and bought a house around the corner just to win her back. I had know idea that tough guy Kiefer could be like that. Thanks>>> to the person, for letting me know about the house. Its cute!
Kiefer was really cool on Letterman!
Kiefer is now with Siobhan and they are happy together. Siobhan is not just a girlfriend ... he shares a lot of things with her ! it seems now that (i'm not sure") they live together in LA and NY.
Kiefer did a great job on the Letterman show with the questions about Jail. He did not say anything about stopping his drinking, just not going to drive when he is. That was sad!
Everything was wrong with the way he was dressed. The suit was fine but the rest in my opinion made him look like a geek, (square shirt and tan socks) too much going on. Even his hair was not the way he usually styles it, it looks like he is going bald!
Please go back to the way you used to dress & style your hair. You looked so old last night. Geeky!
I want the younger cooler Kiefer back. No need to dress like Letterman.
I was so hopeful that Siobhan was out of the picture when I saw the pics of Kiefer & his friend Darla that surfaced at the end of June.
There's something about this one that I don't trust. Especially if some of what I've heard about her is true - be careful, Kiefer!
Just goes to show how different taste can be, Anonymous Who Didn't Like Kiefer's Style On Letterman, because I thought he looked spectacular! Very fashion forward. (Not, imo, "old man"-like in the least.) And I thought his hair and everything about him looked wonderful! Love the all-over tan... that is, not just on his face (which is when it's clearly make-up or spray tan), but on his hands too... which we now know is because he's been spending some time at the beach).
I agree that he did a wonderful job with the interview! :)
YES, I was also disappointed with Kiefer's interview on Letterman because of him still being in denial of his drinking problem. Instead of him addressing it as one, he joked about selling the cars so he would not be tempted to drink and drive. Very immature. His mom was right, he should grow up. He didn't learn a thing in jail except not to bend down to pick up the soap. Like girls want to hear that type of talk. Gross! He has no respect for woman!!
If he goes back to jail, know more 24.. the crew will be out of work again. He got lucky when the strike hit around his jail time. He got lucky just to have a career with 24.
He always dressed with some class on interviews but he looked like a HICK last night and looked 5 years older. It was shocking to see how much hair he lost, unless it was the way he had it combed back. I hope he is aware that tanning will age him even more & give him old age spots.
I liked Kiefer when he first started on 24, he was always humbled and grateful for every thing, now he is just mouthing the words with a snicker & he is prepared for every question. He isn't the same Kiefer. He has changed alot in the last year. He is no longer cute to me......
I'm sorry I watched the interview! He is so different in real life then in 24. In 24 this is the way we wish to picture a man to be, with honor. I'm staying away from all of it so maybe when 24 returns, I'll enjoy it.
"I'm staying away from all of it"
Ok. Bye.
David Letterman took notice that Kiefer was copying him especially with the suit. The socks are Lettermans trade-mark not Kiefers, so I'm not sure why Kiefer did that! Silly.
On the Conan show all he needed were 2 red bands around his sleeves and he would have looked like a Saloon Keeper from the Wild Wild West Show.
Then he was dressed just like Kelly's husband on the Regis & Kelly Show.
All of Kiefer's pic's are staged. When he was having lunch outside on the patio, who in the hell wears a sports coat in 90 degree weather.
His face was so red, that he looked like he had NO lips on the Letterman show. I think he had on white eye shadow.
What the hell is going on, its crazy.
"crazy"
I agree and I don't mean Kiefer or his appearance.
Anonymous...Letterman put Kiefer on the spot about whether drinking was the issue & Kiefer answered like any true alcholic in denial would. He had 3 DUI's & does not get it. He insulted the MADD MOM'S in LA & other states. When he gets his licenses back, they are going after him big time. They will hound the LA police & NY police until they get their man. Kiefer is just a number to them, but he is at the top of their list.
HE SHOULD HAVE SAID HE WAS GETTING HELP FOR HIS ALCOHOLISM. THAT WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR.
Vi...Its so funny about the Saloon Keeper, it was the image I got too & that is where I would put Kiefer, probably as soon as he gets his movie released & he becomes bored.
I do wish him the best with his drinking problem because he will have to fight it for the rest of his life.
Lets hope he doesn't turn to DRUGS because they can hide it a lot easier.
2-Anonymous:
"I'm staying away from all of it"---"Crazy". You sound like a 2 time repeat...repeat...OFFENDER. A 3 repeat...you'll sound like the one with the personality disorder.
Love 24
It seems like he may already have his license back or maybe just to drive to work but he was spotted two Saturdays ago pre-Siobhan I think or maybe not dropping off a woman on Sunset Strip at around 4pm and he was driving off after that; this was posted by a biker on his site.
Also, what do people think about the new beach pics. Looks like Siobhan is still around or more likely, she never left. Maybe Kiefer was trying to throw off the paps, etc. although doesn't make sense since he really doesn't get covered like Brittany, et al. but who knows for sure.
At any rate and whether you like her or not seems Siobhan has fully planted herself in his life. Seems to be living there. Wonder if she quit her Allure job!! It wouldn't really surprise me since IMHO the job became obsolete when Kiefer came into the picture.
"Throw off the paps" in what way? (... though, in whatever way, I agree that that doesn't make any sense; Kiefer isn't "hunted" by paps.)
Yes, it looks like Siobhan is around and, who knows, but it would seem to me like that's probably been the case all along. (While it certainly was possible, given Kiefer's schedule over the past month or so, the fact that we hadn't seen her never seemed to me like any kind of definitive proof that she had disappeared.)
What I think about the beach pics is that they're lovely. So fun to see him playing in the ocean like that and he looks delicious! Re: him and Siobhan, as ever, I just wish him happiness and, so, I wish them happiness.
As for whether they're living together - at that beach house or otherwise - who knows? Maybe she took some time off to hang with him in LA. Or not. Dunno. I'm guessing that, as it has a way of doing, time will tell. :)
I agree, she's still around and frankly I do not consider that a good thing. This is a woman who gets what she wants, by hook or by crook. I've had the misfortune of being in the path of women like her in my life and it really bites. And even though I adore Kiefer, I do not think he looks delicious at all right now. He is way too thin. And somehow I don't see Siobhan cooking him a good hearty meal. She's probably too busy spending his money.
Kiefer and Siobhan were together before jail time (many sightings with a brunette) . I think he is happy with her and when you look at him not only in the pictures but also on tv shows, you see another man more mature and smiling.
Christy, i agree with you , the fact that she has not been pictured with Kiefer, in july, was not a proof that it was over.
To see them again doesn't surprise me.
a fan.
Ha! Kiefer has about 12 brunettes going at all times! Not to mention the one he was dropping off on Sunset Strip a few weeks ago ... in a see through top with 50 bikers watching. If anyone wants to think that was Siobhan, well then, have at it. Hey, maybe she is a working girl after all. LOL
Actually, the brunette he was seen with before jail time may very well have been the vet; there were several sightings with her at that time. That doesn't mean he wasn't also with Siobhan during this period but it wasn't exclusive. People who saw him with the vet described them as "more than friends". BTW, there have also been sightings with the vet since he has been publicly with Siobhan starting on April 1st, at least 2 that we know of for sure.
As for Kiefer looking so wonderful during interviews, yes, he looks very happy but don't underestimate the success of his work right now and how the fans have received him at various events, e.g. Comic Con. Again that doesn't mean Siobhan is not a part of it but let's not give her all the credit. Also, Kiefer physically does not look his best right now. I agree with the other poster that he is very very thin especially in his face.
ok, why are you sure is this vet ? we have never seen her and i wonder if she exists.
One or two people have seen him with a brunette (not Siobhan) and so, he is with this woman. Perhaps, she is a friend as Darla ! Don't you think if he was unfaithful to S he would hide from her. Kiefer has been pictured with Siobhan in August 2007 and according to you, after jail, he suddenly remembered of S and went to NY. It doesn't make any sense.
Sorry, but i don't believe any world of this vet story, for me, it's just a way to prove that K is not serious with S.
It's not very nice for people who call themselves fans.
Many fans don't like her and i can understand that but always hear that she is with him for money or fame... it's wearisome.
I'm not SURE of anything, either are you. At least one person that I know of posted where they saw the vet. I have no idea what she is to Kiefer. But she is a brunette and they have been spotted together. And I would love to hear your explanation for the chick on Sunset Strip. I guess Kiefer forgot to be careful that day. wink wink
I'm with you, Anonymous who's suspicious about the existence of The Vet. Might there be someone who lives/works near the 24 set with whom he's been involved at some point in the past? Sure. Might he even have seen her this year? Sure. Does that necessarily mean anything in terms of his relationship with Siobhan? Well, if you're someone who wants Siobhan to disappear because you've decided that she's evil because you want her to disappear (kind of circular, isn't it?), it clearly matters a lot. :) I think it's called "grasping at straws."
I also agree with you that people who don't Siobhan making such nasty assumptions about her intentions regarding Kiefer gets pretty wearisome. I think it shows little respect for Kiefer.
As for those who think that Kiefer's "too thin", I'd love to know what Kiefer you've been looking at for the last many years because his body is no thinner than it's been for quite some time (and I'm not sure that he's ever been this muscular before). His face is less puffy than it's been for many years, which likely is because he's drinking less (which isn't to say not at all).
Excuse me Christy? You don't think the vet exists? someone you know posted about this lady in scrubs over on Lorelai's board. But maybe she was making it up; yeah, that's probably what happened. and as far as Kiefer being too thin, everyone has their opinion. I know you think you know more than anyone else about him, but there are actually some of us out here that know stuff too.
First of all, Anonymous... if you're going to refer to "someone I know" (and, yes, I know what posts you mean), why won't you own your own posts by signing them? (Not that I don't have a good idea, but...) Just curious.
I don't think that the account of talking to people in that restaurant was made up, but I do think that the significance of the The Lady In Scrubs (who I don't think ever was supposed to be a vet, though that's the occupation that's now been assigned to her) to Kiefer never has been clear. As I recall that information, the people who work at that restaurant said that, yes, Kiefer had been in with that woman - recently and in the past - but what they said was that Kiefer and the woman sat on the same side of the table and may have been more than friends but that it wasn't clear what their relationship to one another was.
The part that I don't think is clear from available evidence is what his ongoing relationship with this woman has or hasn't been... or that it has any bearing on his relationship with Siobhan.
You're absolutely right that everyone has their opinions so I shouldn't have made a definitive statement about his body being no thinner than it's been for many years. imo, it isn't. Clearly, in your opinion, it is.
So, what part of him looks too thin to you?
I've been reading the comments and wanted to address those that say because we haven't seen the vet she doesn't exist or Kiefer wasn't involved with her in some way. Most of the women Kiefer has been involved with have not been pictured with him.
We can't all be Siobhan. That is one of the reasons I have been so leary of her. It seemed odd from the beginning of why there were soooooo many pics of them. Especially when all I hear is what a private man Kiefer is. Doesn't this buck that trend for whatever reason?
He was married to Kelly and then off and on with her for 12 years and we didn't get this crop of pics; he protected her from the paps. He was with Jennifer for 3-4 months and we got no pics except one in front of Dominics; we got many private sightings of them but no pics. Even Catherine didn't add up to this many.
I am only trying to say that just because women aren't pictured with him doesn't mean they don't exist or they aren't involved with him. This situation with Siobhan has been unusual to say the least.
Waves to Christy, maybe you can explain cause I can't....
first - I don't use my name because i learned the hard way what happens when you express anything negative about siobhan.
second - my only interest in the vet/lady in scrubs is to make the point that not every brunette he is with is siobhan.
third - his face looks very thin to me. most evident in the pictures of him outside the Regis studio.i also thought his arms and legs looked terribly thin in the Nascar pics. and even in a few of the beach pics you can see his ribs. that's just me though, only my opinion.
I'm sorry if i came off harshly about the vet's existance. it was just that i knew of the woman who has posted about her. But you are correct, she might not be a vet ... some kind of medical person then in light of the scrubs.
I wanted to just add one thing to my post with regard to this matter. If the Lady in Scrubs is/has been more than a friend (what would that make her-did she sleep with him/did they date date)? and given the woman (who was wearing a see through top and extremely tight pants) who he was sighted two weeks ago dropping off on Sunset Blvd in the middle of the day, I would ask the following to those of you who feel Siobhan is the love of his life and has been since at least April 1st (we'll use that date because that is the official outing if you will):
Does it seem ok to all of you that he would be seen in public arenas with these two women. I just wonder about that thinking. I must be from the middle ages then. Cause I would think and I know for myself if a woman is in a serious relationship with a man that woman would not be too open minded about those situations arising. Maybe it is the dawn of a new day or something where it is acceptable. I must be missing something.
I can't say for sure how Kiefer feels about Siobhan and I wouldn't pretend to know but I am just wondering if that seems like normal behavior to all of you.
Hi Linda. :)
First of all, I totally agree that the fact that Kiefer hasn't been pictured with the Woman In Scrubs doesn't necessarily mean anything. For one thing, I don't think that he's normally photographed in LA as often as he's photographed in NYC.
I genuinely think that the main difference between Siobhan and other women he's been involved with is that he's spent so much time with her in NYC, where celebs are regularly photographed on the street, *and* that they've been together during a period in which there's been increased celeb press interest in Kiefer. I *do* think that the initial photos of them outside of Pastis were "planted" (though I don't think they were planted by Siobhan as I know that some folks do). I think (and this all is just my take based on observations of how this kind of stuff seems to work in general) that it was something orchestrated by Kiefer's own publicity concerns to "reintroduce" him to the public eye in a positive light after his time in jail and I think it also may've been by way of "going public" with the relationship with Siobhan. If they wanted to be out and about in NYC, they were going to be photographed (no matter how private he might prefer to be)... so I think they just jumped the rumor mill by "going public", including releasing her name.
Both in terms of the location of the relationships (LA, Santa Maria and Toronto with Kelly... LA with Catherine... NY and LA with Siobhan) and the timing (Kiefer is as famous as he's ever been right now and the number of celebrity photo sources/sites has gone off the charts just in the last couple of years), I don't think that this relationship really can be compared to previous relationships in terms of how often they're photographed together.
BTW, and sorry to add on but I also notice some of you are stating that he has been with Siobhan a year or specifically since August '07, while he was at a very public lunch with her we do not know for certain if he did see her from that time on until after he was out of jail. It was only reported in the Post Page.6 blurb (which I believe Siobhan's side leaked because they named Kiefer and that is NEVER done in their blind items, that they had actually taken up with each other officially in February '08. But here again if you want to believe he was with her since August '07 then you have to know that she was married and her and Kiefer didn't really give a hoot about it; now that is showing very little respect for Kiefer!!
A couple of general thoughts that I have re: the feeling by some that Siobhan is interested in Kiefer somewhat or solely in terms of being made "more visible" by him. If that's true, it seems to me like she's not doing a very good job of carrying out her goal.
- Given that she was on "her turf" when he came to visit her in Paris, doesn't it seem like she would've been able to arrange for them to be photographed together there?
- We only know that she accompanied him to the FOX Upfronts in NYC in May because, when he got angry at the security guy for putting a fan in danger and it showed up on film, she's *briefly* visible on the film. Otherwise, there would've been no record of her being there with him. He *was* officially photographed at events that day. Doesn't it seem like she would've found a way to be in those photos if she's so single-mindedly about the exposure (and he's so dim as to not get that wouldn't he have invited her to pose with him)?
- We know that they've spent at least some time in LA and there are places in LA where you're guaranteed to be photographed (and Kiefer knows them b/c he's used them for "intentionally public meetings"... like dinner with his dad at Mr. Chow's after the Emmy's) and, yet, we haven't seen them at those places. I'm not saying that we never will (since Kiefer does go to those places), but we haven't yet.
- If she's so ambitious for furthering her own... well, I'm actually not sure I know what people think she's trying to further :)... would she appear with him so often dressed down and wearing almost no (if any at all) make-up?
Christy, I agree with you that Kiefer planted those initial pics both at Pastis and followed up at Waverly Inn; I never felt that came from Siobhan. However, as I have said to others he can't now turn it off. He chose to OUT himself as it were and now he must take the heat. However, I am not sure that the other pics in NYC and two of the visits by Siobhan to LA including one in Griffith Park (do paps normally hang out there) may have been tipped by Siobhan.
Kiefer has made many many trips to NYC over the last two years including in October when his sentence first broke and November around Thanksgving and also the beginning of the month (he was sighted by two people on this visit including the train ride over from DC). On only the one instance where he was food shopping was he photographed by the paps. The others were only private gawker sightings. Wouldn't the paps be basically hunting him down at that point. Wasn't he news worthy then?
Person Who Doesn't Want to Use Your Name Because You Have Negative Things To Say About Siobhan, that's cool... but - and this is a very sincere question - have you seen some of the things said about/to me in this thread because I don't despise Siobhan? Seriously, people have said some pretty amazingly nasty things... but, hey, those are just sticks & stones and they haven't broken my bones. :) I'm just saying that it's certainly not just *not* liking Siobhan that can get a person slagged. :D
I do think that Kiefer's face looks thinner but, jmo, that really is because it's less puffy which, again just speaking for myself, I consider a good thing.
Re: the rest of his body, while the NASCAR shirt definitely emphasized the thinness of his forearms (I think they've always been incredibly thin), I genuinely don't think that his body looks thinner than before. He *is* very very thin, but that's just... him. To my eyes, anyway.
But I understand that we disagree about this. :)
Hey, Linda... I want to (am going to) respond to your question about Kiefer being seen with women other than Siobhan (though I'm not convinced that the woman seen by the bikers wasn't her, but who knows... :)), but want to ask a really specific question first:
When you say "people who believe that Siobhan is the love of his life," do you include me in that group?
I kinda feel like I need to understand that - and/or that we need to reach a better understanding about that - before I continue the conversation.
Thanks! :)
OMG, do you ladies don't have a OWN life????
It always fascinates me when someone asks that question when they were *reading* the comments... thus indicating an interest in them, I'm thinking. ;) :)
Anonymous, apparently neither do you since you are here, LOL!!!
Christy, I will say I believe you are in the camp of thinking Siobhan is good for Kiefer. The "Siobhan is the love of his life" comment may be overstated but it's close to how I perceive some of the Siobhan people's thinking. In fact, I think some have even put it that way without knowing themselves the extent of the relationship. I am not questionning that Kiefer loves her or not. How would I know that and I have to assume he at least has some strong feelings for her since he is with her right?
I am only questionning whether she is good for him and what her motives would be based on what I have examined about her, etc. BTW, you mentioned Paris and the Upfronts. Supposedly Kiefer made a "stealth" visit to Paris yet we got a blurb from a fashion writer at the NY Observer that "Kiefer had made a stealth overnight visit to the lovely and hard working Siobhan Bonnouvrier". Notice that lovely and hard working went side by side with her name. Look, anyone at fashion show may have leaked that to this guy but if Kiefer was so stealth I take that to mean he went right to her room, period; how did he know about it. I guess someone saw them together (I know they walked outside for abit so maybe that is where but who knows). BTW, this reminded me of that famous blurb that got all around about how wonderful Siobhan was for Kiefer and had changed him into a new man in just a few short weeks. That blurb made Siobhan look like one very wonderful woman but Kiefer doesn't come off looking so good so doesn't sound like someone from his side put it out, does it? It also doesn't make Kelly sound so good since she was in his life for all these many years; I would be insulted if I were her.
Thanks for your response, Linda. I'm going to put my response re: what I think about Siobhan alone in this post so that it doesn't get mushed up with other thoughts:
I have no clue whether or not Siobhan is the love of Kiefer's life. I don't think anyone from afar has the information to make that call, one way or another and that it would be kind of early to be making it, anyway. I also know that I don't have any way of knowing whether or not she's good for him.
My feeling is and always has been that I don't know enough about her *personally* one way or another to have a strong opinion about her *personally* one way or another. That includes what *is* known about her which, to me, doesn't speak in any conclusive way about her. Life is complicated and, in terms of relationships, Kiefer's own personal history wouldn't necessarily sound so good if you were hearing it without any context. Heck, it doesn't even necessarily sound so good when you hear it *with* context. But I don't think that he means that he doesn't deserve another chance at happiness (with whomever); so, in the absence of knowing anything else about her except that she divorced in the past year, I don't feel like I can judge her as unworthy of another chance at happiness (with whomever) either.
All I feel that I *can* know from afar is that Kiefer seems to be interested in spending time with her and, so, I'm hopeful for him that that's a good thing. How deep it goes and what will come of it, I have no idea... but, because I wish him well, I wish them well.
Re: Kiefer being seen with other women since he's been "out" with Siobhan, I certainly can see Kiefer continuing to be friends with women he's been friends - and even more than friends - with in the past. I've been in a monogamous relationship with my husband for 19 years now, but always - and from the beginning - I've maintained friendships with men, including those with whom I'd had more-than-friendships in the past. My husband still talks to/sees female friends, some of whom were more-than-friends in the past too. So, of course everyone's different, but that doesn't seem that odd to me.
Also, though we can see from afar that Kiefer & Siobhan have been spending time together for awhile, we can't know from afar what their agreement is about other people. My guess - but it's only a guess - is that there may be an attempt at exclusivity... and I don't think that anything we've seen/heard rumored necessarily means that it hasn't been exclusive. But, even if it's something that they're trying for (and, again, who knows?), given Kiefer's history (and maybe hers too; I just know more from afar about his than about hers), it may not be an entirely smooth road getting to that destination... if/when they do... if that's even where they're trying to get.
... and last response (for now)... ;)
Re: the item re: Kiefer's visit to Paris, I do think that it came from Siobhan's *industry*, but I think that's different than it coming from her or from her *camp*. I also think that you're reading a lot into the word "stealth". He was in and out apparently overnight, which made sense given his own schedule at that point... but, as you say, they were spotted outside. Not very stealthy. :) imo, if she was grasping so hard for attention, she'd have found a way to get them photographed together there, but she didn't.
Regarding the, to me, very clearly made-up tabloid story, what I would say is... not every tabloid story is planted by someone. There are stories that are standard tabloid fodder and "Such&Such Troubled Celebrity has been saved by Thus&TheOther New Squeeze" is a textbook example of standard tabloid fodder. That's what I've always thought that "story" was... from the first moment I read it until this very second.
SB is just a decoy to Kiefer's Camp, to draw the attention away from the real issue and that is alot of the HATE MAIL he got when he was in jail. That's why he has bodyguards around him. Before his sentence Kiefer roamed everywhere free without the bodyguards. Did you ever wonder, why now? And his dog! He is not that famous.
Kiefer is not the only one on the internet with Web sites. Love ones have been Killed by drunk drives and you only care about his next SQUEEZE! If it was yours, you'll be raising Hell.
Letterman gave him a chance, more then one to address his drinking problem & he failed both test. Letterman is a smart & good man. Believe me, Letterman knew what he was doing for the families that are victims of Drunk Drivers. He asked the right questions without putting himself on the spot. Lets see if Craig Ferguson does the same since he is a reformed alcoholic.
Or if someone will change the subject again & again on this site.
By the Way..No, at the Fox Upfront, I seen SB before the cart incident, because I thought it was funny that she said "Hello" to KS agents & they totally ignored her.
The bikers were just joking. They actually seen KS helping a old lady out of the car.
KS has been with the girl in the scrubs, he has a thing for her, but she doesn't like the spotlight plus he paints art work on another girls body and she is the one who exposes herself. SB is not KS only girlfriend. They probably have this thing called a UNDERSTANDING.
They have this thing called a UNDERSTANDING!
All the photo's are a decoy so woman will talk about them instead of the real issue. Are their alot of men on this site? The men are still talking about his DUI, and how stupid he was.
This is the second alcoholic program he has been in. He joked about it and that's unforgivable.
They have this thing called a UNDERSTANDING!
The photo's are a decoy for the woman to talk about. The main issue, he went to 2 alcoholic programs in the past 3 years and he is making jokes.
Are you also in denial of his drinking problem? IT'S STILL THERE!!!
Anonymous, speaking just for myself, I believe that Kiefer has a severe problem with alcohol and that he has had his whole adult life. I'm not in denial about that. At all.
However, he went to jail for drunk driving, not for being an alcoholic. Being an alcoholic is many many things, but it's not against the law and it's not an indication that a person is, by definition, "bad" or undeserving of happiness.
Is he in denial? Probably. It's one of the main symptoms of alcoholism. But we have no way of knowing where his thought process is at about that and the only thing that he's required not to do again is drive drunk, which is what was addressed on Letterman. He didn't/doesn't owe you or me or anyone else an in-depth look into his thoughts about his battle with alcohol.
(As for the rest, for someone who claims not to care who his girlfriend is, you certainly have some strong opinions about that subject. Hmm... ;) )
Hmm...Yourself Christy! Talking about SB again & his girlfriends were probably just an distraction to steer everyone away from the discussion of KS talking about his drinking problems, Jail time & the way he looked on the Letterman show. Even his web sites took action & put those pics up just in time.
On Home-Kiefer Sutherland Site; the message box stopped on Fri-Sat-Sun-Mon(time 2 hrs ago)with Theresa saying-"So I guess those pics confirm that he is still with SB..Do you think its true they are going to get Married".
All the pics just in time for the weekend,"AT THE BEACH" & him mentioning it on the Letterman show. HOW SWEET!!! Those pics could have been taken in May or early June. They were POSTED ON Aug 6th. POSTED ON: does not mean they were NEW Pics. The sites put up old pics all the time. Even the site where they got the pics from sayed; "Posted on Aug 6th" Strange.....
The important issue: this is his second Alcoholic Program. This is an issue we should all think strongly about & fight for someone extraordinarily important as Kiefer to get the word out there. Letterman gave him the chance, but he failed all of us.
All his sites are Staged events!!
2008- One website KieferRocks.
The other sites: sure do get the info, to too Fast....
His sites: add their own Words to Pics!
Posted on: can deceive you.
The message on Home-KS: did stop at Theresa all weekend.
Pics at Beach: Staged-not drinking!! Drinking juice in pics. Having fun in ocean without his girlfriend. Doesn't want to get her hair wet for pics.
This site: Christy to distract...take notice!
Why? Kiefer is Desperate: He hates 24, wants out, working to many hours and the money is not good enough for him, he wants a Big Screen Hit(MIRRORS),so he can work for 2 months out of the year and drink himself to "Death" the other part. Hide, so he can stop pretending in the real world.
Nothing about a New contract this year. They usually renew in April.
NO MORE 24. IT's OVER......
Wow. I think that you may actually be... what's the word I'm looking for? Oh, I know...
Insane.
What you're saying about the Kiefer fan sites is so incoherent I don't even know where to start, but one fact's for sure... he doesn't have an "official" site.
As for 24, the show has been renewed and he has a contract through an 8th season. They're working on the 7th season now. So who knows what it was you were expecting to see in April, but there was nothing to announce. His contract has been in place for a couple of years and the show was renewed through an 8th season way back in 2007.
So, there are some actual facts. Not, I suspect, that they'll pierce your irrationality.
Anonymos has a right to his/her opinion so it was not "insane" to inform us of the dates on the pics, it was interesting to check myself and the dates were POSTED ON: Aug 6th. This doesn't mean they were taken then.
The posted on: dates can deceive, I had to double check myself many times.
Websites do add their own words to the pics. BB site does it all the time!
I guess MYSPACE in not his "official" website either.
His contract was in 2005 for 3 years, who knows whether we should include last year because of the writers strike.
On Penny's website for Kiefer the message box did stop on Theresa all weekend because I checked it out.
The pics did come out at an strange time for the weekend, after the Letterman show.
Just because these are suppose to be "Fan Sites" does not mean Kiefer's camp is not involved. We don't know this for sure but it is very very possible. I would say this is true. They read all the sites.
I guess it was insane to mention that Kiefer was in the ocean having fun without his girlfriend because she did not want to get her Photos taken with wet hair. All true by pics!
You threw in 1 fact (maybe) and you think you know it all. You interpret things so much differently then anyone else, especially when the truth is there for anyone to check. If you don't like others opinions then get off the site. You have no right to be nasty to others calling them names like a child. This site does not belong to you.
When someone is incoherent in an overwrought manner, I'm not going to mince words about it. So, let's go through your post, point by point...
Yes, the dates on photos can be confusing. How, exactly, is that "deceptive"?
Yes, fan sites put their own captions on photos. And? What point are you trying to make?
The new MySpace is, I suppose, going to be the closest thing he has to an "official" site. Since it just appeared late last week, it remains to be seen how often it'll be updated. I doubt that it'll never be a definitive source of news/photos.
His contract definitively includes an 8th season. That was confirmed recently by Jon Cassar.
What is it supposed to mean that Penny's message box stopped at Theresa's post? So what? Why is it strange that the photos came out soon after they were taken? The general response to the Letterman interview was very positive. There was no need to "distract" from it.
If you want to believe that "Kiefer's camp" has a hand in fan sites, that's certainly your right.
Regarding Siobhan not going in the ocean with Kiefer because she didn't want photos of her taken with wet hair, I guess you haven't seen the most recent photos, have you? :)
Anonymous, the site you are speaking is Penny's one and it's not an official site, i mean it's a fan site. It's nothing to do with a good publicity for Kiefer, it's not a PR thing.
I agree with you with the fact that he wants a "real" role in a movie but please stop saying that he's with this girl to distract people from his drinking problem. We all know and he doesn't hide he still has this problem.
Finally, we get the pics of the GF and her wet hair...for those who wonders why she was not with him in the water. Seriously, do you still think they knit in their bed ? Some people need to wake up here, this girl is charming and it seems they were together next year, before jail even if she was and he was still married...(now, it's not the case,strange ?).
Linda, have you seen the pics of August 2007, she has her hand in his hair and she's next to him ... You're going to tell me they were just friends because Siobhan was still married...HUM...We never have confirmation that he was with this brunette "vet", now, you believe what you want. What i see is K and S and not K with the "vet"... And of course, to explain we don't have pictures of this woman, it has been said that she doesn't like spotlight...
I don't know Siobhan so i can't tell she's perfect or not for K. To see them in those pics, they don't REALLY REALLY care of what we think, they are happy and they enjoy life.
A fan.
YEA CHRISTY, STOP BLOWING SMOKE UP OUR ASS. YOU GAVE 1 FACT (MAYBE). KIEFER'S PEOPLE PROBABLY OWN THE SITES. THERE SURE DO GET THE INFO FAST. KIEFER HAD ONE SITE KIEFEROCKS. WHAT, HE BECAME POPULAR SINCE JAIL WITH 10 WEBSITES NOW.
I'M WITH THE OTHERS. SOMETHING IS STRANGE AND EVERYTHING LOOKS STAGED.
KIEFER WAS AN ASS ON DAVID LETTERMAN. HE SAID, "IF A PERSON DOESN'T GET IT AFTER SPENDING TIME IN JAIL, THEY NEVER WILL". WELL, HE SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN IT IN 04 WHEN HE WENT TO AN ALCOHOLIC PROGRAM. WHAT WAS HE DOING SLEEPING. 4 DUI'S AND HE CAN'T ADMIT HE NEEDS HELP AND NOT TO GET BEHIND THE WHEEL. JAIL TIME WASN'T ENOUGH FOR HIM. THEY SHOULD TAKE HIS LICENSES AWAY FOREVER. HE KNEW IN 04 THAT HE WAS AN ALCOHOLIC. BEING AN ALCOHOLIC IS NO EXCUSE TO DRIVE, IT KILLS.
NO EXCUSES!! IS HE A CHILD?
What excuse for driving drunk did you hear him give?
(... and Kiefer had multiple fan sites *long* before he went to jail.)
What excuse for driving drunk did you hear him give?
(... and he had multiple fan sites *long* before he went to jail.)
Apologies for the double post. The board timed-out the first time I posted and I didn't think it took. :)
I agree that Kiefer did not address his drinking problem enough on Letterman. Instead of saying he intends to address it in future, he jokes that he will sell the car!. I think its his ego that needs to be addressed!. He has learned nothing and is likely to continue down the same path.
As for Siobhan, I dont think she is the evil money grabbing witch most have painted her to be. She has her own career so she is making her own money.. I dont envy her being with Kiefer though because theres always going to be other women..not to mention dealing with his drinking binges.. I heard he got drunk later the same day on April 1st (the day of those first very public photos of them in NY) and she didnt want to be photograped with him, though she was happy to be snapped with him earlier in the day when he was sober... what does that tell you?...
Assuming that's true (and, out of curiosity, where did you hear it?), it tells me that his drinking probably is an issue between them... as I would expect it to be.
Alcoholism is a terrible thing to deal with (and, no, it doesn't excuse drunk driving, but I still am waiting for someone to show me where Kiefer made an excuse for driving drunk) and I would expect Kiefer's issues with alcohol to be a difficult thing for him and anyone he's in a relationship with to deal with.
Why do people assume that Siobhan doesn't know that and isn't consciously choosing to be with him in spite of that? Though it can make a person difficult to be in a relationship with, being an alcoholic doesn't make a person unworthy of being loved. Given the change in his patterns (he hasn't been seen at his usual haunts in LA much if, in some cases, at all... he's moved out of that neighborhood, etc), it seems to me like he may be trying to control his drinking. I personally don't believe that he'll succeed in doing that over the long term unless/until he decides to quit altogether... but that doesn't mean I don't wish him well with his attempts... and it doesn't mean that I don't wish Siobhan well if she's hanging in there with him while he tries.
Erin, I glad someone else paid attention to the Letterman show.
He also said, "That his DUI was inexcusable & irresponsible of him and thought he was OK to drive"! WHAT? That was his "EXCUSE"! Of all people after being in an Alcoholic Program in 04 knew he shouldn't have drove, but call someone. He knows the law on that issue after 4 DUI's. IGNORANTS OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE, STOP MAKING EXCUSES "FOR HIM". His arrogants & money made him beleive he was above the law. He got the shit fooled out of him this time & went to jail. He is still arrogant enough to sit there & joke about a very serious issue to the public.
Letterman gave him a chance to be honest but he failed his fans & the public. Don't do a TV show promoting a movie & be dishonest about the rest. We can see through the lies. He became an target for the people who LOST love ones to Drunk Drivers.
If you've really lost someone to a drunk driver (I'm not sure I believe that because I think your real issue is just that you have a Kiefer vendetta... for whatever reason), I'm very very sorry about that. I'm certainly very very sorry about *any* life that is lost to drunk driving.
But... that said, I'm also sorry to say that your comprehension skills aren't very good. You say that he said what he did was "irresponsible and inexcusable" and then you say he made excuses. Um, no, he said it was inexcusable.
When he was asked *what happened*, he said that he believed that he was okay to drive (which IS how a lot of drunk driving happens). That wasn't an excuse. It was an answer to the question. Whether or not you liked that answer, it was an honest answer... which, to reiterate, isn't the same as an excuse.
He never said that what he did was excusable. He said the opposite.
Who are you trying to fool Christy? We know Kiefer just as well as you think you do.
He is with SB because she likes to drink, party and smoke, only they are doing it in private so Kiefer can get his licenseS back. His Good Behavior motivation skills. I'm sure she isn't paying the bills. Her job doesn't pay her millions. She is using him too. Kiefer's arrogant enough to feel its an fair deal!
There are Givers in this World and Takers. Kiefer is a Taker. He is arrogant enough to use woman, because he knows he can.
Just like Drinking & Driving. Arrogant enough to try and get away with it.
He is unworthy of anyones love, thats why the woman leave him. A selfish human being who is not interested in the wishes and feelings of others. Like his Mom, Dad, daughter, sons and close friends or he wouldn't continue to put them through public embarrassment. He is UNWORTHY of their love! THAT HURTS!
No Christy, you do not comprehend the
EXCUSE. The excuse was "He THOUGHT he could drink and drive". A 18 year old excuse! "AFTER THE FACT" he now believes it was irresponible and inexcusible.
YOU don't care whether people lost love ones to drunk drives. You will never compenhend it or understand it, because that person wasn't your love one. So don't even go there by saying your sorry. You don't mean a damn word of it! We need to keep licenses out of the hands of Kiefer Sutherland and people like him who are in denial, so THEY WILL NOT take the one you love Christy.
People like you & Kiefer will only understand it and be in denial until it happens to you. GOD FORBID!
You need to support people like Kiefer not make excuses for his behavior. Thats why he will do it again and again.
I'm sorry, but we simply disagree about whether or not explaining the thinking that prompted his self-admittedly irresponsible and inexcusable act is the same thing as offering an excuse for it.
You think that it is.
I think that it isn't.
And clearly we'll never agree on that point.
Christy. Kiefer being drunk on April 1st is true. It was in the early hours of the morning around 2am, actually making it the 2nd. He had stopped at a hot dog joint after a few hrs of drinking and a fan who was also there took a pic of him... you can clearly see in the pic that he was drunk. The fan also stated that a pretty brunette was with him but said she didnt want her photo taken, yet she was fine with all the paps snapping away after they had lunch. I dont think shes just after his money, but maybe not for the right reasons either. Maybe the fame or exposure? I think someone was right when they said, 'She wouldnt give him a second glance if he wasnt a star'...
I hear Kiefer pretty tight with his money too.
Oh yeah, I forgot about the Gray's Papaya photo. Thanks for the reminder! I thought he looked like he'd been drinking, but not like he was absolutely smashed. As for her declining to "get in the picture" for a fan photo, I'm failing to follow your logic. If she's "in it for the fame and exposure", wouldn't she happily pose for all photos, regardless of Kiefer's state?
As for his being "tight with his money," it certainly wouldn't surprise me in the least if he's *careful* with his money, but I've never heard anything other than that he's a good tipper, which is about the only public way that how he is/isn't with his money would come to light.
Whether he is or isn't "tight" with it, though, I'm curious... what exactly did that observation have to do with this conversation?
I wa just thinking, presuming she is a golddigger.. she is not going to like that he is tight with his money.( an ex girlfriend said that once.. I think it was Tricia) It might test their relationship further down the track.
As for the exposure she's thinking of her own, not Kiefers... What for her is a good pic and what is a bad pic? and being seen with Kiefer drunk is not good exposure for her. Why did she not want one photo taken by a fan late at night? when she was happy enough to be snapped by hoardes of papparazzi earlier in the day?.
I dont think hes tight just careful is a better way of describing him.
Why all this interest in Siobhan? Its been less than a year that hes been dating her. Hes been with women longer that that! . He was with Catherine on and off for five years and Kelly hes known since 1996. All, of a sudden theres this great interest in Siobhan!..for now shes just another notch in his belt buckle!
I agree with, Whats all the fuss about Siobhan?. Why the harsh words about her?
For the most part I think its Envy.
As for the relationship, it remains to be seen if it will last..
Kiefer not exactly Known for being loyal to one woman! ..
Lee, I will respect your opinion and ask that you respect mine and others like me without passing judgement that it is based on envy.
I know for myself that I have very specific reasons which I have stated for being mistrustful of her. It seems to me she may be in it for the access and fame and money. I think you can add to that it is not unreasonable to think that she is blabbing to the press and also tipping off the paps; they always seem to be where she is but who is to say for sure this is just one opinion on the matter.
As I have also stated before it really doesn't matter in the end what you or I or anyone else thinks. Kiefer will make his own decisions and he has made some good and some bad like many of us.
As a fan I just wish him the best. I wish him health and happiness.
Erin made a good point: SB DIDN'T want her photo being taken because she was DRUNK too!!!
Rumors were going around on how great she was FOR Kiefer, at that time.
Kiefer doesn't date woman who willn't Party, Drink or Smoke. After all, they did meet at a Rocco concert, where everyone was partying and drinking.
Or maybe, she was very innocent of it all?! HA!
Envy is Carrie Underwood or Angelina, not an No-body like SB. She only makes a few thousand a year for godsakes.
He showed more affection for Tricia, but your right, he was never loyal to one woman.
Penny Site confirmed they don't no when the Beach pic were taken. He's been seen with other woman so maybe she is history.
a fan have seen her recently in Malibu with his range rover...To explain this interest about this woman, i think fans like me are afraid of this relationship because Kiefer is not married to Kelly anymore...So, if it's serious , there's possibility to see a next marriage.
Now,i think (it's my opinion), they live together and he introduces her to his family and she's not only a "girlfriend". So, now, we will see in the future.
Kiefer does not have his Range Rover anymore. He sold it because it brought him bad luck when he got stopped by the cops.
His people already stopped the rumors of a marriage. Have not seen any pics of them since June. The dates for the Beach pic; no one can confirm dates.
Kiefer said "He lived at the beach before and he would never do it again, to far from work and it was boring'.
His family does not approve of her because she drinks and smokes like Kiefer and his father is allergic to cigarette smoke (the smell on their clothes). You know!
Its his choice, if he decides to get married again, not the fans. If they are still together, let Kiefer have his fun! He Deserves It!!!
We will wait for it to happen, then CELEBRATE!
It's my understanding that Kiefer & Kelly were on again/off again in their 12 yr. marriage. He did have relationships (I think) with other woman in between, but he could have got out of his marriage long ago and married whomever. Who knows why he didn't! SO WHY WOULD WE BE AFRAID, IF HE GOT MARRIED AGAIN? Kiefer will always be Kiefer.
I'm sure if he is going to get married, he wouldn't let his fans down and will announce it.
I'm sure it will be HUGEGANTIC (sorry my 7 year old nephew uses that cute word all the time) NEWS!!!!
I think the beach pics are recent. Last week or so he was spotted shopping for swimming flippers and then he is seen with them in the beach pics. so she must be still around.
Dont trust her either. Her divorce was too quick. I just hope her husband divorced her and not the other way around.
Anony...The flipper pics were posted on or 1 day before the same date as the beach pics. Posted on:(not an official date). Thats why Penny(site) can't confirm official date either.
MAYBE SOMEONE SHOULD LOOK INTO SIB & DAVID'S DIVORCE RECORDS. FIND OUT EXACTLY WHEN THEY FILED FOR A SEPARATION & DIVORCE. GOOD QUESTION?????
Someone sayed she cheated on ex and lied to Kiefer about being married.
Her resume: Drinks, Party's, Smokes, Cheats & Lies. It gets better and better every day. Maybe she is an alcoholic too.
The amount of ugliness and hatred you folks are able to feel towards someone you don't even know is staggering to witness. But whatever... have at it since it, somehow or another, seems to give you such pleasure.
Anyway... no, Kiefer didn't sell his Range Rover.
The mighty and all-knowing Christy has spoken. (insert rolls-eyes icon here)
What's wrong Christy...You can dig into Kiefer's and Kelly's records & life but not SB. I thought you said many times on this site you didn't know her. Do you know her and do you not? If so, tell us how perfect is she? Is she an alcoholic like Kiefer? DO TELL!
Their were many ugly things you have said about people on this site, just like now (ugliness, hatred, insane etc:). WOW!
Hmmm...protesting to much maybe, about digging into SB past.
EXCUSE ME; I thought they said: They would like to CELEBRATE THE HUGEGANTIC EVENT when it happens. We only want Kiefer to be happy.
My opinion about her in the Land Rover was just made up. To derail us from what Erin was talking about.
ERIN; Go back to my message about the Photo at the Hot Dog stand. She did not want her photo taken because she was "DRUNK" too...Thanks
The only thing I've ever said about Siobhan is that I don't feel like I know enough about her to have a strong opinion about her one way or another. And I've said that over... and over... and over. And, y'know, over. ;) And it hasn't changed.
Kiefer & Kelly's divorce records were made public (no digging necessary) because he's a celebrity. Siobhan & David's not so much. That said, I believe it's fairly clear that she was divorced relatively recently. No mystery there.
Given how absolutely furious the Siobhan-hating person who posted about seeing her driving Kiefer's Range Rover was (it was on the "Kiefer's Place" site), I don't think it was her goal to derail criticism of Siobhan. In fact, based on the post, I'd guess quite the opposite.
It will be interesting to see if she attends the premiere of Mirrors with Kiefer.
I dont get these two. In the beach pics, again and I guess many others, failed to see the spark between them as with all the other pics taken of them.
I hope its not true that she was once on The online dating site 'Date Millionaires.com' for Kiefers sake or hes in trouble!
Whatever comments people make Christy, you do not have to throw hateful ugly comments back.
Your NO different then anyone else on this site, your just as bad, speculating & interpreting everything said. These comments are about SB, not you.
The person was joking about the Rover (about it being bad luck). Where is your sense of humor. It was funny!! Just like the pics coming out on April Fools Day! It was funny! To Celebrate a Hugegantic Event (maybe I'll be there). It was funny!
Who knows about SB life, maybe she is an Alcoholic. Maybe she was drunk at the hot dog stand and didn't want her pic taken. Maybe she is some Saint in your mind. Just saying!
There isn't an official Mirrors premiere, i.e. with a red carpet and stuff.
I'd love to know where you get that I think she's a "saint" based on what I've said about her. "I don't know enough about her to have formed an opinion about her one way or another" isn't the same as "I think she's a saint." In fact, it's not even close.
I don't think that the person was joking about Kiefer selling his Range Rover. I think that the person was trying to disprove that Siobhan was driving it in Malibu recently.
For whatever reason(s), some folks are putting a lot of effort into trying to disprove that she's part of his life. And, if that's what people want to do, that's fine. I don't know what part of his life she is, but it seems pretty clear to me that she's some part of it... at this point, anyway.
By the way, if she was an alcoholic (and I've seen no evidence to that effect, but anything in the world is possible and, to reiterate, I know almost nothing about her... imo, no one posting here does), it wouldn't mean I'd think she's a "bad" person. I believe that Kiefer is an alcoholic and I certainly don't believe that he's a bad person.
I thought Kiefer said on Letterman that he was spending time with his father on the beach? and I havent seen pics of Donald in any beach pic lately.. .which makes me question the date of those pics.. thought my reality check is telling me they are recent...
Also does anyone know if the pics of Kiefer with a mystery Bruntte playing golf in LA is Janet or Janice?.. They were taken in 06 I think.. He looks happy in those pics and having fun, and is showing a lot more affection with her than any pic Ive seen of him with Siobhan!..
She certainly is shorter and more bustier,which is how people have described Janet, so I was just wondering... It maybe the first pics of her? I never figured out who the woman was in those pics. At first I thought it was Eva Longoria because they were taken around the time he was filming The Senitel but someone said she was too tall to be her, as Eva is really tiny...So Im guessing it could be Janet??..
It is wierd how shes suddenly appeared on the scene again after being 'absent' for more that a month.. maybe they have on and off relationship. Could be that they had a fight at the end of June, maybe because she was jealous of him being with other women.. and now they've patched things up again.. wild guess?.. or could be she just stayed low key for a while?. another wild guess!!..
In July, there were many fashion weeks (Paris, London, Berlin...), that would explain her absence next to him. Maybe, she was still there but they haven't been pictured together (that was the case in March 2008)...wild guess ?
About the golf girl, i don't think she's Janice or Janet because according to the sightings, she is slimmer than this woman . In december 2006, don't forget he was still with Catherine. It's not a guess we have pics and sightings in airport.
To express my opinion about Siobhan, i find her charming (I can't say she's a bad person, sorry) but her divorce with David is too fast. And seriously, do you think she would be with Kiefer if he was not a rich and famous actor and if she was not a former model? but, I also think she has feelings for him, i see it in her look on those pics taken in NY when they lunch (she seems to have her head in the clouds). Kiefer have changed, he seems more mature maybe, he's looking for stability in his love life ...he's now 41...wild guess. But i don't understand they are still people who think this girl is just a "friend" ; He went to Paris to see her, they were pictured in front of an hotel in London and hand in hand in NY, she was with him in Africa and now, she's in a house in Malibu next to him nearly kissing each other or kissing each other...and i read "when Kiefer tells us he's with her, i would believe she's her girlfriend"...He never confirms when he was with Catherine or Tricia they were together and nevertheless...
I remember a fan on Bennys site said he couldnt have been in Malibu shopping for the flippers at that time, because he was either in New York or at those speed races ?..so either the date was wrong or someone has posted old pics.
I think the Malibu pics are recent though no one can confirm the exact date.
I think Siobhan is still living in NY and still works for Allure. she just spent the weekend with him again as shes done before. Thats my guess. but hey, I could be wrong!.
But Kiefer is so tanned in NY pics and now, you can see those beach pics on magazines...
The photos of him buying the flippers originally were dated August 3rd, which couldn't have been correct because he was in Pennsylvania at the NASCAR race that day. I'm sure that was just the day that they were posted.
He likely bought them on August 2nd or a day the week before that. The beach pics (where he has the flippers) are some day after that. August 6th, which many are labeled, seems like a good bet to me.
To Anonymous above, who wonders how people can be so convinced that they're "just friends" when they've traveled around together so much, I'm with you. We have no way of knowing how serious or not they are or what their time together now will or won't mean in the future, but it seems awfully clear that they're spending time together in a non-just-friends way right this very now.
I think Kiefer and SB are just friends hanging out together. You think we would see more affection displayed between them with so many pics.
With Tricia in Jan o6 at the Golden Globes he was reaching out for her hand and she was being shy with the pics. She went to the Letterman show with him in 06.
With Eva Aug 06(golf girl) he was actually kissing her and they had their arms wrapped around one another.
Since June we haven't seen any updated pics of Kiefer or SB. The Pics of the flippers & beach could have been in June. Who knows? Every weekend he has been busy. Letterman & Regis is done in NY her home town, but no pics. Weird!
On ET he didn't confirm he was with her. They asked,"Will she face her fears & Mirrors with him". He replyed, "OH, you'll going to have to ask her that". He could have said "Of course".
Best to Kiefer and whomever he is with.
p.s. what Kiefer said on Letterman is that he's seeing his dad down at the beach on Sundays. In LA-talk, that doesn't necessarily mean that he and Donald are putting on swim trunks and going into the water together. It could mean that they're meeting for brunch in Santa Monica (which is where I seem to remember reading that Donald is renting a place... could've been Manhattan Beach... or even Malibu... but do remember the "renting the condo" part) or something like that. "At the beach" can be both a directional definition and a literal thing in LA (as is true, of course, of anywhere with a beach).
Also, I didn't hear what he said to mean that they're literally on an "every Sunday without fail" schedule. It just sounded to me like they're spending time together when they can, which I think is great! :)
My brother travels around with a friend that is an woman, but they are just good friends. He dates and she dates others. They have a great time together. That's it.
So this can be true for them. Nothing is confirmed on the issue. Their pics just don't convince me enough, either.
The beach & flipper pics were POSTED ON: Aug 3rd & Aug 6th. I looked where they Originally came from and it read; Posted on also. Not an official date for them.
Heard K state the same thing on ET about, They would have to ask her. Strange statement to make!
There are pics with a girl with long brown wavy hair that he went to NY with & Rocco's concerts with. She is Spanish looking, I'm not sure who she is. Pic in NY, K is wearing a rain coat & has umbrella over her. Sexy body language going on there, the way K is looking at her 07. Concert pics too 07 or 08. It might be the vet. Not sure!
I believe the family meet at the Beach every Father's Day in Santa Monica. His father has a house in Santa Monica and I believe Kiefer's 1st wife. His daughters (Sarah) mother.
The woman in the photos with the umbrella works for Ironworks. That one is for sure not a romantic relationship.
Thanks but I never seen her at Ironworks before and he was going out of his way to Keep her dry, plus they were at the subway together in NY not LA.
Here are 2 sitings of Kiefer in April 2008.
April 16 2008
Could have sworn I saw Jack Bauer at Dan's Subs in the Valley. He even had the arm tats, looked great clean shaven...he was not with the woman from NY. He had his arms wrapped around a different raven haven hair chic. Much more busty & shorter. At one point he called her Janet (or maybe Janice). He was very happy and relaxed.
April 29 2008:
Today was the highlight of my week, No make that my Mouth. Saw Kiefer on Ventura Blvd./Balboa coming out of CHILI MY SOUL. He was clearly in a great mood. He posed for pics with a couple of heavy set gals...one even got him to say DAMN IT into her cell phone. The Kiefer looked awesome, very skinny!Tennis shoes, jeans and blue t-shirt. He left with a pretty brunette who was dressed in, of all things scrubs. DAMN IT, my cell was in the car.
There were other sitings of the 2 girls but I think they are the same Janet (Janice). Dates are very close together.
With janet, he does have a thing for her. Apparantly she lives in the valley (not sure) but its been said she doesnt like the fame, his drinking and smoking and he respects that so he keeps her away from the paps and so forth. Dont know how often he sees her now, but I think he still keeps her close. He should be with her because she likes him for himself and not his fame amd money unlike another brunette I could name..
Oh my god ! Kiefer is in love with this woman but he lives with an ugly and awful person whose name is Siobhan ! Sorry, but you only "think" or you "would like" he keeps this "vet" close.
The best of this story is that the vet loves Kiefer but she's not with him because of his fame etc... it sounds like Romeo and Juliet...Don't you think if Kiefer was in love with this girl he would be with her ? i don't say those 2 sightings are pure imagination but people often see what they want to see .
And you try to say he has thing for her but not for Sib... that's what i understand...
Hello...I'm sure I never read anything about SB living with Kiefer. Did I miss something? Did I miss the announcement about Kiefer being in love? Who said that?
No Tom Cruise announcement, like jumbing up & down on the sofa!!!
How many interviews has he done this pass few weeks. I did not HEAR one word of her name come out of Kiefer's mouth. What... is he not sure yet?
As far back as I can remember Kiefer never lived with any woman. Since when has Kiefer dated just one woman?
I think you need a reality check. Please, someone, anyone let me know if I'm wrong? Steer me to the announcement I missed.
Last I heard he was seeing Janet & SB. So what if Janet likes keeping things under the radar! Seems to me SB doesn't give 2 F's.
Anymonous .theres no need to get nasty!We all hearing stories from differnet sources,so no one got it exactly right!
All we know of Janet is that he sounds happy when hes in her company.he also enjoys Siobhans company but I dont think shes the only woman hes seeing and who says hes living with Siobhan! I have not heard that but then you seem to be the expert!and why dont you print name instead of hiding behind Anymonous.
For all we have heard is that this Janet does like stay under the radar . why have we not seen any pics of her yet we hear of sightings with him? .It does sound funny but thats the way she likes it and guess Kiefer does too.
Whos said anything about him being in love with this Janet or Janice!
He could be, but it probably is more lust... thats why he keeps her around ... same with Darla, Michael and Rocco and a host of others. Then they could be just innocent friends! Ha!
Hello !
Anonymous (post at 1:01 AM) i agree with you : who's said anything about him being in love with Janet or Janice ?
is there a source ? A person who knows this woman ?
Nina, OK, she wants to stay under the radar but they have been seen twice, so they don't hide. It's strange, people are sure there's something between this girl and Kiefer but don't want admit he is with Siobhan.
Kiefer will never give information about his love life during an interview. His last interviews were given to promote Mirrors. Do you see him saying :" yes, i'm with Siobhan, i love her and we live together." LOL.
I'm the Anonymous who wrote the 2 sightings Aug 15-1:44pm & the one who wrote Tom Cruise- Aug 15-10:51pm.
The 2 sightings came from the internet. I didn't make it up. People on this site were talking about it so I looked it up for them.
I never used the word "LOVE" in what I wrote about SB or Janet because Kiefer never used the word. He always said, "A person I "LIKE" alot. Never LOVE except with Julia or Kelly.
Nothing wrong in my opinion if one likes the spot light & the other doesn't. Big deal! The pics of Janet are out there but I can't put a name to some of them, at less 6.
Anony Aug 16-1:01am...You might be right, LUST for SB, Janet etc etc: or just all innocent friends. I can agree with that. Until something is announced by Kiefer, "Himself" I hope his having fun (not drinking) this summer!!
I have heard Kiefer mention personal things in interviews before about his love life. He would not go ON and ON (like Anonymous said at 7:11), but be a little bit more reserved. I heard him say "He is interested in someone at the moment, that he likes alot." He did not say beans in any interviews about SB or Janet. Why? Simple! He does not want to commit himself to a relationship with anyone yet. Not SURE!
There was a moment on ET that he could have said something to confirm him & SB but he did not take it.
ET Host...Will she face her fears and MIRRORS with YOU?
Kiefer said, "OH, you'll going to have to ask her that".
He could have said, "Of course".
(Someone wrote this from this site).
I agree with aKa (funny). I will wait for Kiefer to make the Hugegantic announcement.
Why should Kiefer limit himself to one woman when he can have many??? Oh I so wish I could be one of them. lol
I truly don't understand why people persist in believing that Kiefer needs to declare anything concerning what he is or isn't doing in his private life. Regardless of who he is with at any given moment, he owes no explanation or confirmation to press or fans. IMO, the lack of PDA may mean nothing more than the 2 people involved are mature (or secure) enough to no constantly be meshed together in the public eye.
KC
I do agree with most of your post KC, but there is something odd, imo, when you see 2 people who are supposed to be in a very serious relatiionship, who show little to no affection for each other in more than a hundred pictures taken from several different sightings.And not necessarily the physical PDA's, which people can refrain from doing, but the absence of any facial affection (on Kiefer's part mostly) You can't hide that 100% of the time imo. And if Kiefer doesn't want his private life to be questioned, maybe he shouldn't have paraded this woman to so many high profile places. It's hard to put the genie back in the bottle once you have let her out.
Lysette, i think on the beach pic where she's gonna kiss him or seems to kiss him we can see a physical PDA from him.
I remember just before the 1st april a sighting of Kiefer and Siobhan in LA and the person who had seen them said it was obvious they were not just friends...
Perhaps, when they see paparazzis or they feel watched, they act differently..we don't know. Just guess.
That could be ... it's just a little too much of a coincidence (for me, that is) that we never actually see that kiss. Funny how the paps missed that one. But having said that, of course they must be intimate at times. I would never dispute that. For me it's the lack of something in his eyes, in his expression, which makes me wonder just how serious he is about her. And the fact that he is still being spotted with other women. Strictly my feeling, but this screams to me of something that is much different than what we think we see.
We seen pics of Eva (golf girl) and Kiefer kissing, hugging and touching alot in those few pics and he didn't mind having his photo taken.
Kiefer gets close to someone when they are speaking because of his hearing. Did not see any kissing going on in any beach pics or any others with SB.
Never seen them touch at all except with her arm through his. He does that with his mother. Walking to have lunch in NY, and not once him touching her. He would rather be holding his smokes & cell phone. How many pockets in a pair of jeans!
Sorry, NOTHING going on with them. NOTHING THERE!! She's wishing she can be that "Genie in the Bottle". Well, get in line sweetheart.
what kiss on the beach are we talking about ? I didnt see that. and dont you think the paps would have caught that?.. not just leaning in for a kiss...Look, Im not saying they arent lovers but for a fairly new relationship one would think he would diplay more affection than hes done with her. he has with other women so I dont see what the problem is .
Speaking of affection I can recall pics of Kiefer in the water on a beach with a anonymous short haired topless blonde woman getting it on and kissing. . Theyre still floating around on the internet... I think it was in 04/05... and with Reiko he was often seen getting cosy with in public, and also with Catherine...With the golf girl the photos show him holding her hand and kissing her neck, as well as kissing her and his arms around her ... with Janet hes been described as having his arm around her and enjoying himself..so obviously he doenst have a problem displaying affection in public.. yet were to see that with Siobhan?..maybe shes stand-offish?...but if I was with Kiefer I would be all ove him!
Dont think the golf girl was Eva, though she does resemble her in the face. . Eva is super tiny , under 5ft I think, and the girl in pics is wearing flats and is comming up to Kiefers height, plus, shes too curvy as well.. wish I knew who she was!
Hello...This will sound strange but I was looking at the pics of Kiefer with the flipper boxes Posted on Aug 3. Across the pictures were the words "MAGAZINE FEATURES". I typed it into Yahoo and this is so wierd but came up with this address:...
Magazine Features
Unit 7 Draper Square
Draper Street, Claremont
Cape Town, 7700 South Africa
Now is this strange or what? Kiefer just did 24 in Cape Town.
This place is a leading photographic agency and it a successful agent for all those who want to find the best partner to sell images to. The Flipper & beach images??? I did not get the time to research National Photo Group where ALL the photos originally came from. Need some sleep! aKa
Kate the pics you're talking about with a blond woman on a beach are from 2000/2001 and even if he was kissing her we saw him with her just one time. It's the same case for the Golf girl. How to say that; for me they were just one night fling.
With this Janet or Janice, i didn't know his arm was around her. In the 2 sightings, there's no mention of that.
Kiefer has been seen with her in April and he was already with Siobhan, he has been seen with Darla in June and he's still with Siobhan. Don't you think those women are just friends and that Siobhan knows all about this. Me, i would be jealous if i was her.
Now, for the lack of PDA, there's a pic in NY where they walk hand in hand and in front of the Waverly inn , he almost put his arm round her waist.
Sorry, i don't have the same opinion of some people here but i respect their point of views.
Veronique . There was a sighting with Janice with his arm around her...Someone posted it on Deframer... No one is denying Kiefer and Siobhan arent lovers but he seems to be reframing from showing too much affection towards her in public .. nothing wrong with that either..
aKa...I do find it strange about the pics of beach & flipper pics coming from Magazine Features in CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFICIA.
Kiefer was with SB (I think from stories I read) in Cape Town, she knows how to run photo's and that was back in June. Just saying, maybe.
I wonder if all the photo's of beach & flippers were done back then in June & done in Cape Town. No one has an official date for the pics.
So Magazine Features they find sights to sell the photo's images to? They can have them released whenever?
This is why everyone is questioning these pics about the posted on dates.
GOOD POINT...Cape Town in June, and 24 filmed there at the time. The address did turn up VERY VERY strange...
ok, anonymous, thanks for this info, i didn't know this sighting posted on defamer.
Interesting find...very odd about the address only there is one thing . In the pics he has his dog Jay Jay with him ..Surely he wouldnt take Jay Jay to South Africa? . then again, Maybe?...
The pics were taking here in Ca. before they went to Cape Town, South Aficia.
The pics were distributed by Magazine Features at there home base in Cape Town, S. Aficia.
They usually work with alot of Magazine People like Cosmopolitan, People Magazine, Globe Photos, etc:
The Beach & Flipper pics were done by a Professional Photographer not some Fan. The clarity on the pics were too good.
Maybe from her camp, since she works for a fashion Mag. Just a Guess, not saying it is true. Everyone can look it up for themselves.....aKa
About the woman with the umbrella photos... Anonymous, I didn't mean to say that she worked as Ironworks. She is a person who works with Ironworks, him when he's doing Ironworks business. I think the picture you're thinking of is in London, not NY but whichever place it is, it's Ironworks business. Are you saying that you don't think that he'd hold an umbrella for someone he works with? Of course, he would. Gentlemanly isn't just for people you're sleeping with.
I don't get why people want so bad to prove that he isn't with this lady. why does it matter so much?
Anonymous 7:32pm...The lady in the umbrella photo what is her name? Thanks!
10:07, I don't know her name. Someone who I believe who knows who she is told me that.
More beach pics have been posted this weekend..so they must be recent.. unless they're from the same period as the last ones.. but to me it looks like he was on beach again this weekend..
They look like the same ones, just more of them with Kiefer by himself. Again great clarity, professional. No fan & No paps photo's.
The photo's came from Profimedia, CZ and No description;
Taken with-unknown
Taken on-unknown
You can look it up yourself, no offical dates again. I hate that.
Sorry, to hear Kiefer's film MIRROR'S got bad reviews but what do they know.
I'm going to wait for it to come out on DVD. I don't think anyone wants to hear me scream in the movie theater. Good luck to the brave souls that are going & Kiefer.
Those are paparazzi photos and paparazzi photographers *are* professionals. Profimedia is a media site (one of many many many sites) that buys photos from paps.
We all know there are many media web sites like Profimedia. They also are in partnership with several of the biggest Photoagencies in the World. They do have photographer's available but these pics weren't done by them nor by The Paps.
These Photo's were done by a Professional Photographer & Ageny who have more control over how their images are distributed and used.
His camp are in control of these pics and getting royalty rates for the ones they sell. Why should the Paps get paid when celebrites can sell their own images. Its done all the time. Just throw in a scene or a girl and you have yourself some great photo's for the Web Fan Base & Magazines for people who don't have access to the internet. An way to promote yourself so people don't forget that your still alive. Kiefer coming back for the dead, but jail instead. Remember that's his quote! I find nothing wrong with this. Its the way Hollywood works.
So, it's your contention that *Kiefer* himself is selling these photos?
That's absurd.
Of course, there's a connection between publicity and the paps and the photo agencies and the entertainment sites and magazines, but that's not how it works and your distinction between "professional agencies/photographers" and "paparazzi" is incorrect.
... and since, of all the beach photographs that have been taken so far, exactly *one* has appeared in any kind of non-photo-site/non-fansite media (in the German O.K. magazine), I don't think your theory that he's selling these photos to "remind people that he's alive" holds much water. The fansites certainly don't need to be reminded that he's alive.
So, though I'm not sure exactly what it is that you're trying to prove, nice try... but no dice.
The beaches are flocked with people during the summer months and Kiefer is going to unleash his dog with other people on beach & the paps taken shots of him. I thought the beaches there were more private.
My 83 year old Great Aunt loves 24, she still thought Kiefer was in jail & 24 was over. Mags aren't buying his pics or info. If so, my Aunt would have realized that Kiefer was out of jail. I had to informed her that he was out.
Even the pics in NYC looked staged to me.
I'm a fan of Kiefer's but I'm not gullible either........
Yea, I'm not gullible either... like the Paps are sitting there just waiting for Kiefer to come home every day.
I'm still thinking the pics were done in early June. Your right, the beaches are crowded after the kids get out of school for the summer.
Isn't there a law about keeping dogs on their leash in a public place?
Again, No official dates on new pics.
You may not be gullible, but you're not very clear on the concept of how this stuff works either.
I absolutely think that the most recent photos, the ones that were posted yesterday, were posed... but what's most likely (in terms of how these things actually work as opposed to whatever conspiracy theory you're trying to support) is that he gave the pap access to posed shots as part of a "I'll give you these and then you'll go away" deal. It's a known fact that celebrities do that all the time. (And, since I do believe that the photos were posed for, I'm not sure Jayjay even was on the beach.)
... and I agree that some of the NY shots (the earliest ones with Siobhan) likely were tipped. That doesn't mean that all of them were and, in any case, even when photo ops are tipped to the paps, it's still the paps taking them. It's not photogs hired by the celebrities. There's no doubt that celebrities and the paparazzi have a symbiotic relationship. You haven't uncovered a big mystery there. You're just not understanding how it works.
I'm not surprised that an 83 year old may not have caught rush of publicity work, right up to and including major talk shows, that Kiefer's done in the past month+ or that she doesn't see the coverage that 24/Kiefer gets in TV Guide, but I don't think German O.K. was going to reach her either.
I'm sure everyone knows how the Paps work Christy they can't be that gullible. What your saying is that celebrities don't hire their own photographers. Well, you'll be surprise how often it is done, especially when some celebrities aren't getting the coverage they need, by the paps.
I'm sure Tori Spelling invited the paps to her poolside to take shots of her & her hubby. Some celebrities only wish they were followed around by the paps so they wouldn't have to hire outside photographers.
How many people already told you that the official dates are unknown from the source. Were you there at the right time & place for the pics? Do you know for sure the paps took the photo's? The shots were fake without JJ really being there?(laughing) I'm sure you know all the answers here.
Someone was very much in control in distributing the photo's. So many this week, some the following week & then ones of Kiefer alone. WOW!
83 yr. olds don't also stay up late to catch MAJOR talk shows or get TV guide. Its ashame Kiefer can't get more coverage in mags. that people like to read. Maybe when he promotes 24.
I wonder how many pics were taken of him at Ironworks in the 6 yrs, he lived there?
Funny thing about this discussion on whether or not celebrities hire paps. A friend of mine directed me to the imnotobsessed site today for a story on the breakup of Jennifer Anniston and John Mayer, who she claimed was in cahoots with the paps. I have no opinion one way or another about whether or not this is what Kiefer is doing, but the aticle was certainly timely.
I have to admit that while I truly believe all of these pics are recent (I don't doubt that fact) it does almost seem like Kiefer is arranging for photog access. Otherwise he is supposedly on a private beach so how does anyone explain all this access.
Also, not only have the pics come in the last two weeks while he has a new movie out plus Season 7 getting ready but it's the type of photos, e.g., 1) w/girlfriend; 2) w/family and 3) w/dog and looking very fit and trim, I might add. These all show Kiefer as a family man and homebody. That is an image I am sure that his bosses at Fox are all too happy to portray and considering the investment they have in him it would be understandable.
If this is the case I am not being critical of Kiefer. Publicity for a star is all part of this business and I think Kiefer knows this business well since he has spent basically his entire life in it. BTW, since Kiefer doesn't get the headline coverage like covers of People, etc. it would make even more sense to me that he would encourage more pics by the paps. It's a good way to get the postive image out without him even saying a word!!
Just my two cents for what it is worth, lol.
Im starting to question the dates of these pics too?...if they're recent which in reality they probably are.. why have we not heard or seen any more sightings of KIef and Sib in these last few months?..something casual like going out for dinner or lunch?.. that hasnt been heard of since Late June?... I dont think Kiefers looking for Publicity...Magazines dont pick up on him enough anyway..just liile tibits now and then..
2:07pm, I have never - not once (and you can check my posts for confirmation of that) - said that there isn't a relationship between celebrity publicity and the paparazzi. Of course, there is.
However, tipping the paps to available photo ops and/or making an agreement with paps to give them some shots in exchange for being left alone isn't the same as *hiring* photographers.
Celebrities pay their publicists to get them publicity and, yes, this is sometimes done by tipping paps to available photos.
No one who isn't clueless about how the world works would deny that.
All I'm saying is that you're not accurately understanding and/or representing how the relationship between paps and celebrity publicity works.
Hey, Lysette... just to be clear, there's no question in my mind that tipping of the paps goes on - and there probably are celebs who do it themselves (I've read that about Mayer before but don't really know anything about him so have no idea whether or not that's something that's likely to be true... or not).
Certainly, publicists do it. Who knows for sure (I think it could go either way), but I don't disagree that the beach pics could've been tipped by Kiefer's "people"... though I do somewhat differ with the perception that he's not getting enough publicity. I think he's getting a fairly appropriate amount of mid-range celeb publicity.
There's just, even then, a difference between either a celeb or his/her publicist tipping paps and the incorrect distinction that Anonymous @ 2:07 is making between paps and "professional photographers." That's all I'm saying. :)
I don't believe the pics are that recent. They had to be taken in late June sometime, because he was so busy promoting MIRRORS during the week and on weekends in July & Aug, plus working on 24.
Something unusual about all the NY & beach pic to me. Maybe it's something I haven't seen Kiefer do before. It doesn't seem honest or real to me.
Someone said that Kiefer, now lives in Malibu at the beach. Why would he want to let the paps know where he lived? He always liked his privacy. So, I'm beginning to believe that maybe he or Fox hired a Private Photographer for those pics.
Sorry, I just can't picture Kiefer sitting at the beach twiddling his thumbs waiting for the paps to get there. He would be the type to CALL THEM or WHOMEVER to get it "over with". He would probably be directing them(laugh). Then he would be on his way to a Rocco Concert to have some fun (hopefully not drinking) on his days off.
So... bottomline, the big goal here is to "prove" that the beach photographs were taken in June so as to "prove" that Siobhan isn't any part of his life at this point, right?
(Not that I know whether she still is or isn't or exactly what part of his life she's ever been - or vice versa - but I'm also not invested to the death in proving that she's not. ;))
Sure. but arent you curious as to why theres no recent NY pics.. He was in NY for all those interviews,Yet no Sib?...Just curious..
This whole Siobhan thing is very interesting. The ones who don't like her seem to feel she has manipulated her way into his life for all the wrong reasons, and the ones who do like her seem to love all the pictures they are getting of Kiefer in this relationship. Since nobody knows for certain what the real story is, neither side should dismiss the other out of hand. For the record, I am firmly ensconced in the first group.
2:08, don't know, but... maybe she was in LA when he was in NY. If the August 6th date for those photos (which I don't see the big reason to doubt) is correct, that's certainly possible.
Lysette, just speaking for myself, I'm in a third group. I don't know Siobhan (or feel like I know enough about her from afar even) to have a personal opinion about whether I "like" her or "don't like" her. I certainly don't feel like I know enough about her from afar to guess at her motives (or his) regarding the time they're spending together.
I actually think that there are a lot of Kiefer fans in that third group. I certainly know many of them myself.
So, yes, I love to see pictures of Kiefer with her, but the why of that is simple and has nothing to do with her specifically: it's that I just love to see pictures of Kiefer, period. :)
LOL Christy, why did I know you would say that. Whatever, I won't belabor the point because it will only end up where it usually does.
Sorry, that was me.
Lysette, I would guess that you knew that would be my response because it's what I've said consistently (and over and over) about the subject all along. (Along with saying that, if this is something that he/she/they want, I wish them well... which isn't about knowing whether I, personally, "like" or "don't like" Siobhan... since I don't know her... even from afar.)
Evidently, you've been paying attention! ;)
*sigh*
I just saw some video of him outside a strip joint in LA last night, and it appears he had been drinking. Oh man. I read on one of the blogs that someone is wondering if he was at a bachelor party ... and that they're happy he's out having fun. Sorry, this kind of depresses me.
Wonder what happened to ole Siobhan.
These photos make me sad too. He's just such a dignified guy... except for when he so isn't. As for "boys will be boys", imo, he's not a boy. He's a 41 year old man. A 41 year old man with, imo, a severe drinking problem.
So, yeah... on this (the "depressing" thing, that is), we agree, Lysette.
I actually agree with you Christy. This is a really wonderful man, imo, with a big problem. I'm still rather blown away with some of the comments I have read elsewhere; that he's just having fun and good for him. Color me bewildered.
Lysette...I feel the same way, I just want to sigh!!!
Christy...You are the most dense person on this site. You deliberately turn every bodies comments back to SB over and over again. Its becoming nauseating! I don't think your a fan of Kiefer's at all. You sound like your in love with this SB and like seeing "her" in the pics, more so then Kiefer.
Please..."Everybody" I make a comment Aug 19 @ 7:57 pm, did I mention SB at all in that post? Christy made an response to it @8:37 pm. How in the world did she interpret "SB", in the point I was making about all the pics.
She is just brilliant when interpreting everyones comments. NOT REALLY!
I think they are going to put the pic of Kiefer Drunk on this web site X17 because I had a hard time getting on. The pic is copy right by X17. The people that don't like him are going to love it and I'm going to hate the comments.
Maybe he was not drunk, just having some fun. The copy date is on the 19th. I checked to see if it was a old pic. BBBenny told people in the chat room not to talk about it but its out now.
I think he could still be in denial about his addiction to drink. He thinks he has it under control but he hasnt. But thats his business and he has to sort that out for himself... Of course hes only human and he's going to fall down sometimes.. but to be seen drunk outside a strip club so soon after his drink driving arrest , it is kinda sad.. the critics are going to have a field day on this one!..
Obvioulsy, he doesnt care what people think..Its his life and he'll do what he wants..maybe it wasnt actually the stip club he went to ( wishful thinking!!)..after all the post did say he was seen 'outside' the club with a group of guys talking about all things, basketball..At least he wasnt driving.. thats one good thing!
Lyn, I was doing some wishful thinking too but did you see all the pics, the one with his pants unbutton. I'm thinking maybe he was drinking alot not to realize that.
I'm mad at the friends he was with for not bringing it to his attention. What kind of friends does he have that will not look after him at least a little bit, especially because of his public image. I thought that what friends were for. My friends look out for one another.
I don't think he got his licenses back yet. I think it was for 18 months. He has to complete all his programs first, (not sure about this). Whatever, I'm also glad he was not driving.
It is his business but I wonder how many other times has he done this since getting out of jail that no one knows about. I know of 3. Its sad! I don't want to hear the nasty comments and X17 are the ones who have the pics.
Hi Anonymous. Yes I have now seen the added photos..doesnt look good..
Also I think his license was only suspended for six months (also not sure)
and the programs were for 18 months.
I wouldnt be surprised however if he wasnt attending any of them ..Oh well..same ole Kiefer!
Lyn, This AN@8:36. I hope you can take some time out of your day and read what I posted as a comment on the site X17 with Kiefer drunk. It's the one about Kiefer spending the rest of his life in a "Rocking Chair" and how we wish we could all have gone out a had alittle bit of fun like Kiefer did. I was hoping to discourage anyone from writing any thing nasty about him.
I'm almost afraid to check back and see if anyone wrote something wise back about my comment. I might have encouraged instead of discouraged.
Its to early for me to look just yet. Would like to enjoy my coffee first (laugh). I'll check back with you later. Have a nice day...Joyce
This comment has nothing to do with the new pic of Kiefer Drunk in anyway, sharp or form because I like him!
I think Christy can see now, what a Pap shot is and an staged one on the beach.
A Professional Photograph is like the ones on the beach. Picture in your mind, models... male or female having their photo shoots done on a beach for a layout in a Magazine. Now, just picture Kiefer pics but they made them look a little bit like the Paps took them. The quality were to good to be from the Paps.
The last pics of Kiefer running were done by a movie camera, not one that you would buy but one from a movie set. You can't click a camera fast enough without getting blur shots. They took the movie clips and made them into still photos.
My point for this is simple. I don't recall Kiefer or his Publicist ever doing something like this before. I think it was to show us a well behaved Kiefer and he needed more coverage before his movie for his Fan base. Kiefer has always been more honest then that. Or maybe, his girlfriends idea since she does layouts for magazines. Bad idea!
The Paps would not be carrying ALL that equipment with them in their backpacks walking onto a private sandy beach.
Regardless of whether or not every one of the photos was tipped and/or posed (which isn't impossible) or not, the distinction you're making between paparazzi and Professional Photographers is just plain incorrect.
Paparazzi *are* professional photographers. They have top of the line equipment and skills and, yes, sometimes they are tipped by publicists.
Your ignorance on this subject really shows when you say that the running shots would've had to be taken with a movie camera. No. Still cameras, in the hands of a skilled photographer (which paps are... because they *are* professional photographers... i.e., they make their living as photographers), certainly can and do take action shots. I recommend to you the entire body of sports action photography as evidence of that indisputable fact.
Let's say for a second that all of the shots in NY and all of these beach shots were planned/tipped (which, because showbiz *is* showbiz, isn't impossible). If so, in answer to your wondering about why this hasn't been common (though I also think it hasn't been unheard of) with Kiefer before, I'd offer... well, Kiefer never spent 48 days in jail after being convicted of a third DUI before either.
Now, I think I have the answer to why everyone believed the photos of Kiefer & his ex girlfriend looked staged. I don't remember the Paps taking alot of nasty pics of Kiefer before. It would seem he was well liked by them. I'm beginning to wonder whether he did something to anger them. The Paps didn't go after Kiefer that much when he first got out of jail. The photos they did take were just of him (not girlfriend) on a few streets in LA & NY. Not nasty ones.
I can believe now, that SB had her photo people taking the pics of her & Kiefer. In doing this, they cut the Paps out of some money. It would seen the Paps are out to pay him back by exposing nasty pics of him now. They say, "The Paps can either make you or break you"!
I feel bad for Kiefer because I think they are going after him until he makes good with them.
X17 was blocking me from getting to any sites of Kiefer except the newest pic of him drunk. Just a bad feeling I have but really hope it is not the case.
Joyce
The paps are "going after" Kiefer because they posted a couple of unflattering shots of him? I don't think so.
x17 is hard to navigate but all the pics of Kiefer still are here.
There have been lots of unflattering pics of Kiefer published in the past.
Kiefer sighted at Dans subs in the valley, posted Friday. He was with Gary oldman and two brunettes. Apparantly he looked exhausted, the poor thing.. too many late nights at strip clubs?! (just kidding) .. wonder if one of the brunettes was Janet or Janice? as this is one of the places hes taken her to in the past... could be Siobhan?. ..or even Darla.. then again, who knows how many brunettes he Knows!..
Sorry, forgot to mention there was two brunettes with them..
Crap! No I didnt!.. OK IM GOING NOW.. ITS BEEN A LONG DAY!
Alot of people knew that Kiefer was not ready to commit himself to one person or he wouldn't have gone to a strip club. Relapse! No, he had to know where he was going that night, a place where he shouldn't be with his drinking problem. It's where he wanted to be.
In my opinion SB has been history since June when he was with Darla, maybe Darla was the one at Dan's, back in April and this time. I still believe the pics of beach etc: are "old", going back to late June.
Whether it was with SB, Darla or whomever. In my opinion whether anyone wishes to hear it or not, I always felt Kiefer wasn't ready to be in a serious relationship until he got his drinking problem under control. It takes time and I know people who have stopped cold turkey. He doesn't want to!
I wish Kiefer nothing but the best of luck, he seems like a nice guy in his interviews and in reading articles that other people have said, about him.
I can't wait for 24.
WOW.....Who can blame Kiefer for leaving this middle-aged old hag for the hot young striper he was talking to outside Cheetah's, she's the one who gave him that Lap dance & much much more. He sure did look excited after that!
Well.. I Have to say now Im convinced that he and SB are no longer an item..and the beach pics are older pics that had recently been posted. Its too long that we have had a proper sighting to think otherwise....
Maybe she was tipping of the paps after all, and he figured it out or as the pics of them seem to show there was no chemistry there...
whatever the case I think hes back on the singles market..
Having said all this it will just my luck that SB suddenly appears again!!..
Sorry to disapoint you - SB IS living in his house in Malibu! I'm always at this part of the beach (since years, not because of Kiefer, so I'm not a "stalker" or something!), and I've seen her there,just again yesterday, also seen him and her last week - no paps around, nothing - but still no PDA! So whatever "relationship" they have, she IS with him, but I still doubt it's love on his site.... But who knows?
Anonymous (11:03), you confirm what we guess, they live together. Thank you. I think Kiefer would not live with her if it
is not a serious relationship. Now, she seems to have a big place in his life and i wish them happiness.
A big place in his life? I hope you're kidding. I have no idea what exactly their relationship is, but I can tell you one thing; when a man's special lady comes across the country to spend some time with him at his becah house and he then shows up at a strip club with some floozie, well, um, not something to be happy about imo. I for a time thought their relationship might be serious, but this last month has convinced me otherwise. I think this is just a relationhip of convenience for both of them. No love at all. He gets a pretty girl on his arm when he wants one, and she gets to live the high life on his dime.
Sorry but Im not convinced. Theres been no pics of them for ages. And I dont think she would just get up and leave her job suddenly which is in NY.
The fact that he went recently to a strip club also makes me doubt... until more pics emerge I will not be convinced.
Lysette, I am with you. I have been convinced after the last few weeks that this is a relationship of understanding of some sort. Not even sure love has anything to do with it. It may have started out that way but who knows. Afterall we are talking about Hollywood here.
She seems to be in it for the fame and access and he loves to always have a pretty woman on his arm. Plus, he leads a rather interesting life so at least publicly he can sport a cleaned up image. She is certainly living the high life as you say on his dime and he has a ready made date. However, as we saw from the recent strip club sighting, well I don't need to go further, do I?
I have stated before I believe Siobhan has been tipping off the paps all along cause she loves the camera and loves the fame.
Time will tell on this well. In the meantime, this is a relationship that has caused much debate. Bet Kiefer would be amused, lol!!
Kiefer going to a strip joint also has made me question the nature of this relationship.. for such a 'newish' relationship one would think he wound'nt go to a strip club if he was happy ?... I think its a big statment to her that says 'you dont own me and I can do what I want, go where I want, and see who I want'..
This is from one of the celebrity websites. Not sure if it's them but sure does sound like it. However, whether it is or isn't goes back to all the postings on tipoffs to the paps.
Today's blind item comes from Buzz Foto...
Everyone has been speculating that this star calls the paps when they go out. Sorry, but if you’re assuming this, you’re assuming wrong. Oh, that doesn’t mean calls aren’t being made, because they are. They just aren’t coming from the star. The star is actually annoyed that they can’t seem to escape the snapping of the cameras. How is it that the camera always finds our star? Maybe our star should ask their best companion who is or was seen with the star lots and lots. Funny how the two were together in all the fotos. When honesty can’t always be the key factor in a relationship, becoming famous can. Oh the shame and deceit! Could it really be true?
Any guesses?
Interesting. Even if its not about Kiefer it certainly rings true.
In my opinion 'calls' are or were being made . Not by Kiefer. but we do suspect who...
Pleazzzzzzzze!!!
The Buzz Foto blind items give you the possibilities and Kiefer isn't one of them. *rolls eyes*
If those of you dissing him and his life choices were really fans you wouldn't be dragging his personal life through the tabloid mud.
Have some respect.
And as for Kiefer being amused?!?!?!
Would any of you be *amused* if it were your life being dissected and run through the mud like you are doing to his?
With fans like this who needs enemies.
Sheeeesh!
Hey 1:22, try not taking it so personal; I really don't think Kiefer does and btw, how do you know the buzz foto is or isn't. If you read my post, you would have seen that I made that point but why should you read when you could just react.
Btw, I do believe Siobhan is tipping off the paps and that is a reflection of her, not Kiefer.
As a matter of fact I believe this tipping off goes all the way back to when we first saw them together in August 2007. He seemingly took her to an out of the way place for lunch yet there were the photogs all ready to go and Siobhan was ready for her closeups. The photos turned up in Hello Magagzine. A few days later Kiefer again took her out and this time for dinner at another seemingly out of the way place called Cafe Stella (noted by TMZ) and there was TMZ ready with their cameras. Once again, Siobhan in tow. Coincidence?????
This is a man, Mr. Sutherland is, who goes out all the time with women and we never see photogs except, of course, when Siobhan is around. Not saying for sure this blind item is them although nothing saying it isn't but that doesn't change my opinion on the matter.
Hey 4:50, and what point would that be?
That you intentionally posted a blind item post from a pap site to purposefully stir the hate pot?
That point?
And then added your own opinion that it sure sounds like them EVEN if it's not.
That point?
Oh and I read what you wrote and sadly I've read much of what others have written here and elsewhere too.
It's pretty sad imo.
But if you're cool with stirring the pot of crap you all are cooking and you don't mind the stench, please have it.
But it can't be surprising that not everyone is willing to sit down and eat it with you.
Enjoy the slop! ;)
To 6:10 The place in August 2007 isn't an out of the way place. It's in the heart of trendy Los Feliz, not far from where he lives. He's been photographed there on other occasions too.
Where he hangs out in NYC is another extremely trendy place to live and see STARS. The restaurant he went to is known for paps.
If anyone was tipping those early April sightings and his re-emergence after his jail stint it's been his people imo. He's been doing a really good job rebuilding his image leading up to his honest and open appearance on Letterman.
At the same time, he appears to be trying to build a relationship and move on with his life as he's been quoted as doing.
Who knows what his and her relationship is, has been, or will be. I certainly don't know and neither does anyone else posting here.
So why try to tear it down?
The problem with guessing that the Buzz Foto blind item is Kiefer & Siobhan is that it works from the assumption that non-Kiefer fans have any idea that the two of them have been photographed together more than once or twice (if they even know that much). Less than a handful of their photographed-together moments have appeared in media... and mostly then only on small websites. The fact that we, as Kiefer fans, see more photos (which, by my math, still comprise a teeny percentage of the time since April... and who knows how long before that they were spending time together) simply speaks to the fact that we seek them out.
My guess is that the response of the average Buzz Foto reader would be along the lines of "Kiefer and who now? Huh?" Because outside of the realm of Kiefer fandom, this isn't a well-publicized relationship.
... which to me, along with other factors, kinda argues against the idea that Siobhan is "in it for the fame" too. I have no idea what their relationship is or isn't, if she still is in LA (and has been for quite awhile now), it seems to me like she's keeping a very low profile.
Maybe it seems like she's keeping a low profile, but maybe they aren't spending a lot of time together. And of course, his recent strip club outing would be quite obnoxiious if she is still there.
Hey 7:36 I simply posted a blind item and stated my opinion which is all it is. There are many fans who have believed all along that she is tipping off the paps because the pattern for Kiefer in the past has not been this many photographs especially with women.
Btw, I know that part of NYC very well and you should know that Kiefer has made many trips there totally under the radar without pics that is, of course, until Siobhan came on the scene. Btw, that also goes for his LA neighborhood. Kiefer goes out all the time. You mean you have seen that many photogs of him through the years. Most of the pics previously of Kiefer were by fans not professionals.
Hey unless you are Siobhan or one of her Fashionista friends why are you getting so bothered if people state an opinion of her. She is a fashionista, why would you be so surprised that she isn't the best of peeps!!
Oh and how much of a relationship is he building if he is hanging out with strippers. Wow, that's some stable relationship. NO, my guess is Siobhan is perfectly fine with all of it as she gets to live of the Kief and his money!!
Hey 6:29 while I stated my opinion in this post, which last time I checked everyone (even you) have a right to do, I also stated that I posted it as part of the discussion we were all having earlier about how photographers work.
IMHO, this blurb fed right into what some where saying that the stars or people they are with are sometimes the ones responsible for having their own pics taken. It happens. It is not always coicidence that photogs are just there.
I agree with you Linda. Kiefer gets his strippers when he wants them and she gets his money and access.
Do you all even read what you write?
Is it something to be proud of?
Yes you are entitled to your opinion and from what I can see that opinion isn't very favorable of Kiefer or his life.
Unbelievable.
2:44 and yes stars and other people do tip photogs. But instead of seeing that it could actually be Kiefer's people doing the tipping the gf hate assumes it could ONLY have been her. Discounting that he's come off a difficult year image wise and maybe, just maybe its been him on occasion.
To not think that this last year has been far different than other years for him is being naive. It's therefore not a stretch at all to think that perhaps he'd make use of the media to repair any public perception problems that may remain. He is afterall a business commodity and his financial worth is as much image based as it is talent based.
As for the posting of the blind item - it's my opinion that it wasn't merely putting it out there for discussion purposes - it was put out there to feed the hate.
But whatever.
I've followed Kiefer's career since 24 began. I find him to be an incredible actor and a decent, humble man. Someone who never says anything negative about others and takes personal responsibility for his actions and decisions.
Too bad some of his fans can't be as gracious and learn from his example.
All I wish for him is good health, happiness and peace. And that he can continue to do what he loves and because that includes acting and music I get to enjoy the fruits of his labor. :)
his life, not yours - Get over yourself!!! Sorry, you do not have a monopoloy on wishing Kiefer well. This is an internet site that focuses on famous people and their comings and goings, so why wouldn't folks post their opinions here? Nobody has called Kiefer an axe murderer or his gf a filthy name ... people are just "discussing" that's all. Your holier than thou lecturing is quite boring.
11:02!
Sorry you don't like what you see in the mirror.
I've got my opinion, you've got yours.
'Discuss' all you want. And I'll keep holding up that mirror.
How's that?
I quite like what I see in the mirror; sorry to disappoint you. And thanks for the permission to "discuss" LOL
Appearently Mr. Sutherland had a day off today - saw him at Malibu beach with his so-called "girlfriend" and another couple - Mr. Sutherland enjoyed water, waves, his dog and a drink - but no PDA towards his "girlfriend" - not at all, in fact, he couldn't have cared less...
So was it is 'real' girlfriend or one of the other so-called brunette girlfriends you all are talking about? And by drink - do you mean a drink or a drink? heh! And how is JayJay these days? Any signs of paps for future pics? And hey, I thought you couldn't have a dog on the beach during the summer.
There a hundreds of dogs at the beach... And yes, it was SB, no other brunette around. JayJay (seems they don't call him JayJay but "Ado" or something like this) looked fine, about the drink - dunno, he had a bottle in his hand, no water bottle, but could be something else "harmless".. No signs of paps, but I wasn't close enough to be sure of this.
oops - sorry, there WERE paps around - check out justjared.com!
ZOMG!!! You saw him wet and half naked! AND you sound so calm about it all?!!?! *dies* Thanks for the photo tip ;)
5:51, funny that you weren't close enough to see paps, but you were somehow close enough to know that he "couldn't care less" about Siobhan. Seems like you'd have to be close enough to talk to him to know that since you'd have to ask him.
totally agree with you 8:21.
8:21PM: it seems 5:51 - (Why doesnt anyone print their name!?) saw no PDA from Kiefer from where she was standing .. nothing unusual about that. It sounds like he was enjoying the company of friends more that anything else?..
When paps take private pics of stars the majority of them hide behind bushes and in cars,etc. Thats why some celebs go ballistic when they spot them..its an invasion of privacy, as you know .
(Kiefer is probably too polite to react)... And its probably the reason 5:51 didnt see them.
5:51 again. I just used not seeing the pap as an example. I could have said "how could you not have been able to tell what he was drinking but you could tell what he was thinking". The point was that even if she didn't see PDA, she can't know what was in his head unless she asked him. Maybe they are just friends. if that's true, Kiefer's not a very good friend if he "couldn't care less" about his friend, is he?
So where are the pictures of the gf? Don't tell me she's suddenly gone camera shy, LOL.
or maybe she's never been as much about the camera as those who can't see clearly through their green eyeballs think she is.
Or maybe it's gonna snow in Malibu tonight,NOT!!!
Green eyeballs? Oh what a mean thing to say, hehehe.
maybe mean. definitely true.
Oh please..true in who's eyes? yours? In my top million things to care about, this doesn't come close to making the list. But if it makes you feel proud and excited to say it, knock your socks off honey.
So you dealt with a million other things today before you got around to following this thread and posting here? wow, you're good.
I am good, aren't I? Thanks for admitting that!
oh yes. very good at being at jealous and bitchy about someone you don't know.
You know nothing about me, and with this I am out of here, That should make you very happy since you seem to have nothing better to do than police the internet for things you find offensive.
Someone is posting on other site (JustJared) that Kiefer was seen with another woman, not Siobhan, over the last couple of weeks.
Not sure what to make of it but he sure is hard to keep track of.
Hopefully we get pics soon..
<<< Hopefully we get pics soon..
How about video? There's video on both showbiz.sky.com and youtube from over Labor Day weekend that include Siobhan and Kiefer in the surf off the beach in Malibu.
I think that footage is going back a couple of weeks ago when we had all those pics of her on the beach. Not saying shes not there, but I havent seen pics of her yet from the labor day weekend. Its all been Kiefer with some male pal..
The video doesn't go back a couple of weeks. Someone who was there - and has posted this in a couple of different places and who isn't a fan of Siobhan's so has no reason to make this up - saw exactly what was on the video... and it was this past weekend.
Is she still there? Who knows? The same person says that the house has looked deserted for the past couple of days. Maybe they just rented it for the month of August. Dunno. Just a guess. But, in any case, she was there last weekend.
Is the Miami beach house still deserted?
You mean the Malibu house?
Yes.
It seems that they just rented it. Probably just for the month of August.
kiefer is so not right for her hes fourty one and shes thirty five
has anyone seen desert saints with kiefer in it doesnt want u to kiss him
and besides he broken up with her because she said something bad about kiefers daughter sarah
She didnt say anything bad about Sarah. He wouldnt still be with her is she did.. the magazines made that up (surprise!)
Still dont know what her motives are given what others have said about her..whether shes in it for money or love I think Kiefer can take care of himself and is a big enough boy to make his own choices...
Hes been seen with other women while hes with her.. so his motives arent exactly clear either!!
OK. Kiefer himself has said he has no plans to marry. (The statement is on Bennys Blog)
Maybe now all the rumours will be put to rest.
Have watched this thread since the beginning. It's kind of like watching a train wreck - you know you shouldn't but you can't seem to tear yourself away.
Mostly I feel overwhelming disappointment at the way some women continue to view and talk about other women. It's very disheartening to see this kind of stereotyping of ourselves in the 21st century.
And although facts seem to be blithely ignored, thought I'd interject a correction to the previous post which said "Kiefer himself has said he has no plans to marry." If you're going to attribute a statement to someone, isn't it easier to use the actual words? Otherwise, it just morphs into the internet version of post office resulting in gobbledy-gook. And in this case, the "actual words" represent the best shot at an amateur translation by some nice people willing to take a shot.
"Q: Rumor has it that you will soon get married to the recently divorced Siobhan Bonnouvrier, an American journalist. Is that true?
A: No. I am single and I feel good about myself. I have been married twice (his second divorce was made official in May). I think it's useless to rush and tie the knot. At my age, I'd rather enjoy the good times. I've also learned to be as discrete as possible about my love life. To shut up! There is nothing worse, than when a relationship ends, than to have to spill the details."
Now taking into account that this is a translation and it's possible nuances may have been lost or misinterpreted, let's see what the facts actually are.
1. The interview took place at ComicCon on Friday, July 25th in terms of placing it in the time line.
2. His statement represents a change from the Playboy interview in February 2004 where Kiefer said, "Marriage is not something I want to again. I took a couple of swings at it and struck out. I'm done." Now he says, "... it's useless to rush and tie the knot". So, he now holds out the possibility of eventually marrying someone at some point in time with some potential person - useless to "rush" is a marked change from "I'm done".
3. He certainly has walked the walk since Julia in terms of discretion and keeping his private life private. Between Kelly, Catherine, Trisha and Siobhan, there have been fewer than 20 photos and articles published outside the tabloids or photo services. That's over a period of 14+ years. Pretty impressive for anyone living in the public eye.
4. Kiefer has made (or had made on his behalf) four direct statements about his personal life in those 14 years:
a. The press conference the day before he married Kelly.
b. Flying back from Hawaii (where he was filming To End All Wars) to appear on ET and squelch the rumors that Kelly was an unfit mother and that he had taken out a restraining order when his attorney checked a box incorrectly in the initial divorce filing. He apologized profusely on camera and said he had retained a different attorney.
c. Being interviewed on ET Thanksgiving weekend 2002 saying it would be impossible for him to be engaged since he was still married.
d. Having his PR people issue a denial early in the summer that he was engaged to "his girlfriend, Siobhan Bonnouvrier" which he answers here for a different audience (American/French).
5. In stating that Siobhan was his "girlfriend", it was the first time his PR team has used the word girlfriend to describe anyone since Kelly. There was never a direct quote (People magazine said quietly dating) about Catherine until, again in the Playboy interview, Kiefer used the past tense to say he had had "a girlfriend for a year" without actually naming her. (A sign of discretion) Kiefer only referred to Trisha once (at the DVD launch party a month before their only other public appearance at the Golden Globes) as a "friend" - not by name. (Possibily another example of listening to his inner voice to Shut up!)
So - the only rumor I knew of about marrying Siobhan originated in a single tabloid which did what tabloids want to do - wreck havoc among those who seem to have already decided one way or another what's best and/or what's the truth.
The truth is that nobody knows outside of Kiefer and Siobhan. And that is a fact.
**Opinion to follow**
I hope Kiefer finds peace and happiness. If that happens to include Siobhan, with whom he has been seen for over a year, great. If it's with someone else or in his own company, that would be great too.
I thought I entered my name, but obviously it didn't take........ along with most of my comments.
This and the post above are from Marbeth.
My basic comment is that "it's useless to rush and tie the knot" is very different from the 2004 Playboy interview where he said, "Marriage isn't something I want to do again. I took two swings and struck out. I'm done."
Now, he's leaving open the possibility of marriage at some point in time in the future to someone. That's a real change in thought. (And speaks absolutely nothing one way or the other about Siobhan. Just that he can foresee marriage as an option is a change.)
The other point is that he's certainly practiced discretion in terms of his relationships since Julia. Between Kelly, Catherine, Trisha and Siobhan, there have been fewer than 20 articles and photos not from tabloids or press photo sites. That's over a period of 14+ years.
Signing it again ........ just in case. Marbeth
Actually, Marbeth, didn't Kiefer's publicist say that he's not engaged to his "current" girlfriend. That,I think, is an important qualifer. I don't know what it's supposed to mean, but it's important. And didn't he say in the Rolling Stone article (2006, I believe) that he wasn't thinking of marriage while he was doing "24". Maybe he's softened his stance on that one, gradually through the years. Just a couple of thoughts.
When I said Kiefer has spoken that he has no plans to marry. I didnt mean it as 'never again'.
I was just trying to point out that Kiefer was clearing up the 'recent rumours' that had been doing the rounds on the internet, that he plans to marry Siobhan soon..Not true according to him ..
Actually here we go again with the marriage rumours!.. this time ET Canada may have started something.. it showed footage of Siobhan wearing a ring on her left hand.. still the reps for Kiefer are denying any engagement..
Besides wearing a ring on your left hand doesnt always mean anything.. I wear a ring on my left hand on occasion and Im not engaged!..
I know many people who wear rings on that finger without being engaged or married. :)
One misconception that I've seen on some Kiefer boards (not saying that anyone posting here thinks this) is that the interview in which Kiefer said he's "single" (which, to me, can mean all kinds of things, including most likely that Kiefer's exercising his discretion - as he mentioned in the quote too - in terms of talking about his love life), is that the interview is very recent. Actually, it's from Comic Con in July.
Whether what he and Siobhan are doing is serious or not, they've certainly spent time together - including what seemed to be most or all of August in Malibu and the sighting in NY - since that interview.
July qualifies as still recent to me. I know hes exercising discretion but
To say Im 'single' after all those NY, London and LA sightings with Sib is a bit odd ?.
I guess that it doesn't seem odd to me both because I've never had a definitive opinion about what the nature of their relationship is (or isn't) anyway and because he is technically single and, well, yeah.... the discretion thing.
To me, it is and always has been a "who knows?" dealie and all we really can know from afar is that, as of at least last Saturday, they still were spending time together... in whatever way.
I don't disagree that July is relatively recent (and I absolutely believe that they're not engaged). I've just read on a couple of boards that he "just said" that he's single in a way that made me think that the people posting that might think that he gave this interview the day it was published (or just before) and that's not correct. That's all. :)
i think they will soon be engaged, just my opinion...What Kiefer would have bought this big house in NY for ? It is NOT a house for a single man. He used to have an appart in this town ...
I have no idea what is/isn't or will/won't happen with Kiefer and Siobhan, but I don't think it's odd that he'd buy this townhouse whether or not he's planning on sharing it with her (or anyone). Kiefer's really wealthy and, by his wealth's standards, that house honest to goodness isn't *that* big. :)
The pics of Kiefer and Sib at Michael Thompson Exhibition Sept 11 on Benny site. Is Sib pregnant?
Don't think so. She was photographed a couple of days later, smoking a cigarette. Doubt she would do that in public if she was pregnant. I would certainly hope not, at any rate!!!
12:54 maybe the photos of a few days later with her smoking are old ones. She does look pregnant, don't you think?
The smoking photos, where besides smoking ,she doesn't look pregnant at all, were two days after the gallery photos. I don't think she looks pregnant at all.
Shes just very curvy around the waist. You can see that in the beach pics of her... Makes a change from all the skin and bones women you see a lot, these days.
.
Shes just very curvy around the waist. You can see that in the beach pics of her... Makes a change from all the skin and bones women you see a lot, these days.
.
Shes just very curvy around the waist. You can see that in the beach pics of her... Makes a change from all the skin and bones women you see a lot, these days.
.
Shes just very curvy around the waist. You can see that in the beach pics of her... Makes a change from all the skin and bones women you see a lot, these days.
.
Sorry about the triple posting!.. My computer was playing up!!
I remember in May that people were speculating that she had a baby bump. She seems to have a bit of a problem area around the waist. I think she's lucky to only have ONE problem area. LOL And yes, the pics of her smoking were taken September 13, for sure.
I'm sorry but are you looking at the pics from the Michael Thompson Exhibition on Sept 11? I was not talking about any baby bump with her smoking and with a white summer top on. In the black dress it looks more then just a problem around the waist area. I didn't think she was that large there, but it could be the dress. Maybe this is why she hasn't been seen much with Kiefer. I could be totally wrong!
I have been in Canada for 3 weeks and missed alot, still trying to catch up. Can someone catch me up on the strip club? Does this mean Kiefer and Sib broke up? Its hard to figure out because I'm not sure whether I'm seeing "new pics or old ones".
From 9/22 at 12:17 pm, Thanks so much!
Sorry again but forgot to put my name this time for 12:17 and 3:28.
Hi Emily. From what I gather, SB wore a certain style skirt or dress to the gallery opening which gave an illusion of puffiness around the waist - at least that's what many folks interpret it to be because there were photos of her taken 2 days later where she's in a white T and smoking a ciggie.
I personally think she just has a small issue around her midsection just as many middle-aged women do - many tend to bulge a bit in their midsections.
As far as Kiefer's strip club visit a month or so ago, it seems as if he paid that visit while SB was staying with him at the Malibu beach house. Some people have speculated that it may have been a bachelor party, because he attended the wedding of Dave from RDB about a week or so after the strip club visit.
Thanks for the info 3:54.
I would like to know if 24 is going to relocate in NY because of Kiefer buying a townhouse there or maybe Ironworks? I was reading a Mag. a few months back about TV shows wanting to relocate on the East coast because of cost in LA. I also read that the writers on 24 are bored with the story line in LA. I also read that Rocco is bigger on the East coast (alot of fans) that like his music. Has anything been mentioned about a new 24 season or about Rocco relocating? I did hear that Ironworks sign with another production com. in NY.
I would so much appreciate any update on this and about Kiefers new townhouse which I think is a great investment. Does anyone know where it is located?
Like I said, I have been away in Canada for awhile and I'm just trying to catch up with things in the States. Thanks so much everyone!
Emily, i think he has also bought this house to be next to or to live with Siobhan, just my opinion because when he's in NY, they are pictured together.
Whatever some people think, he seems to be happy with her. I'm surprised to read so bad things about this woman ...
She is very beautiful and she's with Kiefer, she's just a lucky girl. Those fans who don't like her are going to be very disappointed if one day, he would marry her. I say this because everytime we've got pics of them they say he doesn't care of her (no PDA) so why is he still with her after more than one year now ?
Nothing against Siobhan..just dont believe shes the only woman in his life..At party in LA this week just before the Emmys he was reportedly seen flirting with another woman at a party in LA, touching her neck, and 'giving her something' ( some have guessed it could have been his Ph No??)
The person who saw him thought at first it was Siobhan, but saw the woman get in to a car with another man while Kiefer returned to the party..
I think Siobhan was in NY at the time or why did she not attend the Emmys with him??...
I know shes with him but I dont think hes completely faithful to her..it seem she doesnt mind either and is willing to go along with whatever their relationship is..
It could have been Siobhan...Nothing to say it wasnt her.. maybe she left the party early because she had to return to NY?..could have been just a friend too... but then Kiefer does like to flirt at parties!!.. .and Beverly Hills is full of beautiful women!..
The person who saw him took photos so I hope she posts them so we can see who she was...curious.
Actually, Siobhan would most likely be in Europe right now, for fashion weeks in London, Milan and Paris. September is "the" month for fashion weeks.
agree with you 7:09, she could have been Siobhan or a friend . Why people always say he's unfaithful ? What i see today is a man who is happy in his life. He's with a very cute woman and do you really think he wants to go and see another woman ? hum... We have seen them in NY, LA, Paris (he went to see her there), London and Africa. They were in this house in Malibu and you always think he's unfaithful when she's not here ?! Why ?
Yes it seems he is still with her in some capacity right now, but I would hardly call this an exclusive relationship. Not only was there the strip club sighting while she was in Malibu, but he was also spotted at Dan's Subs with another woman and also for a walk on the beach with yet another woman. (both who were reported not to be Siobhan)
Sorry, but I totally disagree with Kiefer spending 8+mil. on a townhouse just to be near his girlfriend. He did not just start going to NY for her but because his daughter goes to college and lives there for the pass 4 years now. He also went there before his girlfriend because of business with Rocco and other bands. In my opinion he has developed strong business connections there in the past 4 years for the music industry, that he loves so much.
Plus he said someday he would love to do a play. He knows 24 will not be forever and he is looking for other investments. Kiefer knows that in his line of work, it will not last (the money). I believe he is into something else(investments) and we will not know probably until it happens.
He might change the townhouse back to units so he has a place to stay and the bands he wants to devolop, like Ironworks. This is just a guess of course.
He can't afford to send 8+M on a girl, would you if you were in his shoes? A man might spend that kind of money on a wife but not a girlfriend even if he does plan to marry her. He would wait! When Kiefer drinks, he has fun & with woman too. His big down fall.
Again just my opinion!
I agree about him buying the townhouse in NY is not just about Siobhan, but to be closer to his daughter and for other business ventures.. He also saw a great bargin when the house went on sale!
12:41pm - you ask why people think hes unfaithful?.. Because hes a celebity and he can!. He's been doing it for years.
He couldnt even be faithful to Julia Roberts!
A lot of people insist he's looking to change because hes getting older but hes only 41.
He himself has said in a recent interview that he has no plans to marry soon as hes been married twice, and also said at his age he'd "rather enjoy the good times" which I believe he is doing, not just with Siobhan but with others too . Theres been too many sighting of him with other women since hes been with Sib to say otherwise.. He hasn't been exactly discreet about it.
Kiefer has always denied his story with Amanda Rice ... and it's not because he has been seen with other women that he's automatically with them (since he is with Siobhan).
I can understand why some people expect it's not serious with this woman but perhaps he is very in love with her and he tries not to repeat his mistakes to keep her.
6:29 I had to laugh when you used the word "bargin" at 8+M. You and I probably could have bought 8-9 homes with that money or more anywhere else, but being NYC I guess your right. I think I really could have bought a small Island somewhere just to get away from the rat race. Ha! Ha!
Why did Rocco not go to his best friends wedding when the rest of the band was there? Dave and Rocco were childhood friends. Dave & Jenn were going together forever so the wedding must have been planned for awhile. Has anyone heard whether Kiefer and Rocco split up? There hasn't been anything about them or pics together for a long time. Did Jude take over Rocco's band? I know Kiefer has been busy but Rocco was always around somewhere. Is this the reason why Rocco did not go to his friends wedding because Kiefer was there?
If I know Kiefer he probably rented the beach house this summer because he had to work and wanted a place close by work to hangout with his friends for his summer vacation. He likes being around his friends but I didn't see any pics of Rocco there or heard anything. Does anyone know whats been going on with them? Has anyone else notice this?
I was away in Canada and was wondering whether I missed something with their relationship. Can anyone update me? Thanks!
I can't believe your using Dave's bachelor party as an excuse for Kiefer being at that Strip club. I myself can't believe Dave's friends would have a party there out of respect for Jenn. Dave is not a Kiefer, he has alot of respect for Jenn to be seen there in the first place.
I'm not sure where everyone is coming from or the age group on this site but young couples like Dave & Jenn are fore-going the B&B parties. They are doing a destination Jack N Jill party of going away for a 2 day weekend of fun with the whole wedding party & friends. They are being more sensible about drinking and driving and mainly out of respect for one another before their wedding day so know one gets into any trouble.
Maybe Kiefer didn't get that Memo.
Besides if Kiefer had any respect for his girlfriend he wouldn't have been there either. That memo also went over his head and into the trash. Kiefer will be Kiefer and if his girlfriend feels she is going to be the "one" to change him, well get in line with his 1st wife, Julia, 2nd wife, Catherine, 2nd wife again, Tricia, etc: or even his daughter, mother & father. Well good luck to her if she thinks she is the "ONE". Meanwhile she will be the one to lose that time in her life, not Kiefer.
oh come on .. do you really believe Kiefer has been with other woman and nothing is happening?..even though he has a girlfriend.
Kiefer lives in a different world from us and temptation is everywhere. He only has to call up a woman and shes there!
Of Course he would deny the story about Amanda Rice. Hes not going to admit to an affair to the public when he was engaged to Julia.
But I believe Julia wouldnt have left him if he hadnt because she was very much in love with him.
He even said years later that he "blew it" with Julia . I think thats the closest he came to admitting to it.
You people crack me up. Not one of you has any idea what's going on in Kiefer's life now or what went on it in in the past. You don't know what he wants or what he's doing and you don't know what the women in his life want or what they're doing. But damn that sure doesn't keep you from talking like you know everything about all of those things. Except for a few people it seems like everyone's either so green with jealousy that they can't see straight or is just mad at him for being famous or something else negative. So much negativity.
He's gorgeous and sexy and talented and he's doing whatever the hell he wants with his life without checking in with any of you. The women he's with obviously are getting a taste of something a lot of you wish you could and I'm sure they couldn't give a flying fig what any of you think of them.
Hilarious.
obviously someone touched a nerve with you or you wouldnt have wrote something that is spiteful but then who give flying fig what you think.
People here are entittled to their opinions without someone like you attacking them for it.
I agree. A lot of these posts are only done in fun . Of course nobody know whats really going on!
We can only guess and spectulate. But they dont need someone else to come along and attack them for it.
The post by Lissa appears to be critizing the content of many of the posts not whether people have a right to their opinions and I agree. Many of the posts have an undertone of jealousy and nastiness and certainly do not appear to be in fun.
12:41, Your right someone did touch a nerve with Lissa and it was a bad attack. I think it was probably about his girlfriend trying to be the "ONE". The rest of her post didn't make any sense because why would any of us be jealous or mad at Kiefer for being famous. None of us or her would be on this site now if he wasn't famous and we didn't think he was talented, sexy etc. This is what makes a person famous by others paying attention and taking an interest in them. If you want us to stop because you are the one who is jealous then poor Kiefer willn't have a fan base or don't you give a flying fig?
What do you know who is getting a taste of what from Kiefer when it comes to women, he also might be gay for all you or we know. He would never tell. Even his girlfriend of the moment wouldn't know. So do we want a taste of that. I don't! Just spectulation of course.
So Lissa, it is Kiefer who wants to keep us intrigue and most fans fall for it. Send your post to Kiefer, I'm sure he would appreciate it. If he writes back and wants us to stop, of course we will!
Yea Lissa, "Kiefer will do whatever the hell Kiefer wants to do with his life" without checking in with any of us or his girlfriends too, of course. I feel sorry for Sib! What ashame!
Yea, that's what we "do" know about Kiefer, Lissa. Thanks
6:19AM, you got it. Who cares if people speculate. People always will speculate. It just blows me away how nasty some of you biddies are about people who are strangers to you. It's really "fun" to you to be so mean? Sad. But enjoy.
Did Kiefer have a fall out with Rocco? .
3:30 If you listen to the new radio interview on BB site Kiefer did for HoneyHoney he mentioned that Rocco is at IWS recording a song "Save Yourself" for 24. I believe it is going to be the theme song for 24 because it will have footage of S. Aficia in it. Kiefer probably got Rocco the job so I guess their relationship is still going very strong. Jude has been more involved with this because of Kiefer working so much this summer, but I think with Kiefers time off in the pass few weeks he has been overlooking things for the CD because someone just did another interview with Kiefer 2 blocks from IWS and he said he was still living there. We will hear it on TV Fox station in Nov. Its 6 years for both of them now.
PS: I also believe that we will see Kiefer and Rocco together when they promote the CD and Kiefer of course with 24. So their is alot to look forward to in the next month. Maybe Kiefer and Rocco will go on Tour early next year.??
Emily M what do you mean when you say it's 6 years for both of them now.
People on this site are just having a DEBATE Lissa on the things that Kiefer has said himself. They are just pointing out their opinion about it. I haven't seen any nasty words going down. I also haven't seen where they are jealous of anybody, except for who might be right or wrong about an issue.
I'm sorry, but I haven't seen any nastiness that you are referring too. If you really want to read some NASTY things, go to KIEFER SUTHERLAND RELAPSE "Chloe I Need New Pants" and sign a complaint there. The things people said there were gross and you should enjoy that. After you enjoyed that site go to the one where Kiefer goes to jail. When you are done, come back and you will find this site pretty well tamed by then. Sad but true! Have fun and enjoy!
"I haven't seen any nasty words going down."
That might be the single funniest thing I've read here. You do get that saying nasty things about ANYONE, not just Kiefer, is "saying nasty things", right?
Yes nasty is "When Kiefer was in jail I wonder if some other guy had his dick in him?" Is that nasty enough for you. Glad we can entertain you. So please go somewhere else to enjoy yourself.
OMG! What about "Kiefer had his cock in so many holes and now Sib is sucking it"! Maybe Lissa gets now how tame this site is or was.
Sorry Kiefer, just a example about Nastiness for Lissa!
You people really don't get it, do you? And I am enjoying myself, thanks.
Yes we get it! Your finally enjoying yourself.
Continuing on being nasty: I couldnt help but notice from the Sept 13th NY pics Kiefer looked to take more interest in his male friend than in Siobhan. Could it be that he does have gay tendencies?
Just an observation..
Yeah, "just an observation". Riiiiiiiiiight. I don't know or care what his sexuality is but, if that's "just an observation", I'll eat my hat. The fact that you categorize your "observation" as "nasty" gives away that you would consider that a bad thing. So, not "just an observation" is it?
You girls need to chill!.. There are more important things going on in the world than to get uptight over someones elses post over a TV star!
There were things going around before about whether Kiefer was gay. That's probably why we don't see any PDA with Sib, she might also be gay. She looks like one in a manly way.
He doesn't take her to any of the Events with him which is strange unless he is embarrass to have her around other celebrities. She's not classy like the other girls he took in the past like Tricia. You know, no star qualities. Maybe she has a big mouth & might spill the beans. Other celebrities can see a fake a mile away or a fake relationship.
I have seen him more excited being around Rocco and other guys too.
"Just a observation" 7:12pm
Why, is it that as soon as someone hears the word Gay it is a bad thing or nasty thing? If Kiefer is gay would that be such a bad or nasty thing? If he is, do you want him to go on forever pretending? Will you still be a fan and support him? What are you all afraid of?
His a great actor and I love him in 24, one of his best roles. The show keeps me on the edge of my seat and that has never happen to me since Friday the 13th movies. Its a thrill! He is great! If he is gay it will not take away from the character he plays.
What century do you live in where we can't talk about gays with a open mind? There are believers and none believers about Kiefer. We don't have to get nasty either way with someones opinion. That's what I like about X17.
My favorite movie with Kiefer in it was "Behind the Red Door". He played a gay guy in the movie for those who haven't seen it. Watch it. Its great!
Well to be open about Kiefer being gay or not, I guess I fall in the questionable area. Not sure!
I have given it some thought and I'm with some people who believe Kiefers and Sib relationship look fake.
Ever since the pics came out it looked like they were snickering at us. With her, Kiefer has been different and its not because I see any love there. If anything I see alot of disrepect. It looks like they are more buddies then lovers. Even through Kiefer never said out loud she was his girlfriend the pics imply that they are. Maybe? It still indicates a lie.
He can talk passionately about his daughter, his mother, his father, music and especially about Rocco (even shows alot of affection with Rocco) but he can't say anything about a girlfriend that he is dating and they are doing that and that's it. Whats the big deal! She's not a star like Julia. His not a big star like he was, when he was with Julia. Just an excuse?
Something is weird with this and with his other relationships with women. He has never lived with any of them, not even his wife of 14 yrs. Which is weird too. Why be married to that person all those yrs and not be with them? Strange.
I feel that they are playing a game with us. Its an dangerous one on Kiefers part (she has nothing to lose) but sometimes fans will not forgive being made FOOLS of or thinking we are gullible.
She is the one who I thought was gay first then I started thinking about KS. Maybe Kiefer doesn't know or see it.
3:56, I'll bet Kiefer can live with you stomping off in a huff if you don't like the way he conducts his life. In fact, if he read what you wrote there, he'd probably say "please, GO."
Excuse me but why do you think Siobhan Zetumer is gay ? Please answer to this question ... because i think she's madly in love with him and you can see that when she look at him ! So why ?
9:03 she may be madly in love with him but I don't see that reciprocated; do you? Kiefer looks fake and posed with her not like he does with the entire rest of the population. Just look at the recent charitable event and fan pics posted. Doesn't look like that with Siobhan.....
3:56 I don't understand why you say that about Siobhan. Just one person's opinion but I don't see that at all with her.
Linda, i agree with you, i don't know if he has strong feelings for her... only him can tell but when i see the fan pics of him and Reiko (on Penny and Benny sites), here, i can say by the way he was looking at Reiko, he was madly in love with her.
And, in fact, when he's with Siobhan, i don't find this same look or he hides his feelings but why ?
This is my opinion. Let me tell you a secret : i'm jealous of Reiko, what a lucky girl she is, even it's over with Kiefer.
i'm 9:03 but my real name is Alice.
hey Alice,
I thought Reiko would have been a cute match for Kiefer and he definitely seemed "interested" in her at the very least. There were pics where he had that look with Catherine too. However, it seemed that once the Season ended and Reiko was off the show that was the end of any relationship there may have been.
I Just think all of the relationship breakups have more to do with Kiefer than the ladies involved. What reason, I don't know. Just from an afar perspective he seems excited for a few months then gets bored maybe; that's one thing that I see.
But I think he has deep conflicted issues within him and maybe this has something or everything to do with it. Or maybe he loved Julia so much and hasn't found a replacement for her but his first marriage was short lived too and in a way he sabotaged the Julia relationship. He also seemed to sabotage the marriage to Kelly early on. It's as if he either just doesn't think he deserves to be happy and does things to wreck his happiness or he really doesn't want to be in serious relationships and he does things to undermine them.
He has said in interviews that he is not the easiest person to live with.
Personally, I think work and music make him the happiest and he just has "relationships" in his "downtime", if you will.
Who knows for sure. Maybe Kiefer doesn't even know.
I'm a gay woman & that's how I know Sib is gay. It takes one to know one. When the Ellen Show first came on years ago I knew she was gay from the start. I loved Alley McBeal Show and as soon as the woman who is with Ellen now (sorry can't remember her name)came on I knew she was gay, the same with Rosie & others.
In the pics & videos with Kiefer, she just touches him in a playful way. Its the way she looks, acts and especially where she lives. Sorry I just know!
With Kiefer I'm not sure. His a guy, you know, but when I started to really look into is lovelife, well it is strange. Like you are talking about.
I read everything about KS like you did when it came to Sib. Not once has Kiefer ever confirmed they are a couple. He said "No" and his Reps said "No". Just because they were hanging out together the media assumed they were a couple and so did his fans. I feel Kiefer and Sib played on this, just for the fun of it, for everyones reaction, even the media & of course everyone was gullible enough to fall for it. In the end Kiefer didn't really lie to anyone because none of the media asked him the right question. The question should have been "Are you and Sib a couple?" It was always a question about being engaged. Read things again and you will see.
They are just buddies. I have male friends & I get that all the time. Like I said, I'm not sure with Kiefer. Maybe??
Just because I'm a gay women doesn't mean you can't be a fan to a male star like Rosie & Tom Cruise. Love 24!
Hey Linda.
Just wanted to follow-up on one factoid from your post. I have no idea what happened to end Kiefer & Reiko's thing (or how serious they ever were, etc), but it definitely wasn't her being off the show.
Since Michelle died in the first episode of season 5, Reiko shot her last bit of 24 in the summer of 2005. Who knows when they started spending a lot of time together, but they were sighted together during a 2-3 month period beginning in late April or early May 2006, i.e., 9-10 months after Reiko last worked on the show.
Hey Christy,
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking '05 but now that you mention it that would fit with them being pictured together at that club in NYC which I thought took place in '06 after he got back from the ITYTKM tour and I didn't think they were together at that point. However, that makes sense that they may have started up something from there or shortly thereafter judging from the pictures!!
To the gay woman: I questioned whether Kiefer was gay too. I never thought that he was, until I watched the Doc.,"I Trust You To Kill Me". It was all the things he did for Rocco and the way he would look at him.
He took Rocco with him to Japan when he was promoting 24. The Doc wasn't made yet and the rest of the band was left behind. Strange! Most guys would take their girlfriends. Rocco doesn't seem to be into women either like the other guys in the band.
Something seems weird with the relationships he has with women. I agree with everyone else about the pics with Sib and Kiefer. Fake! Kiefer treats her like a buddy.
Did you notice the pics on this site of her, she is dressed to show off and then, their were pics of them sitting on the street corner with her smoking her smelly cancer sticks. Doesn't she realize that not everybody in the city takes their animals to the park to do their business. What a LADY! She acts like a tough guy. No class.
If she would act like a lady, Kiefer would have gotten her a taxi instead of making her walk in heels or a bench to have her smoke or helped her across the street with his hand at her back or helped her get out of the corner by pushing his chair in instead of letting her deal with it. So much love! No, Kiefer treats her like one of the guys. Maybe she is gay.
So, let me see if I understand you correctly, 7:18pm. Is it your position that a woman's not being a "lady" (by your ridiculous to me - but whatever - definition, anyway) is the equivalent of that woman being gay? How enlightened of you.
Also, do you think that Kiefer's cigarettes are "smelly cancer sticks" and do you have disdain for him because he smokes them too?
Finally and just out of curiosity, what century do you live in with the whole "Kiefer would've gotten her a taxi, found her a bench, helped her across the street, etc" stuff? She's an adult who's perfectly capable of walking in heels (if she's able and comfortable doing it, why not?), deciding where she wants to sit, walking herself across the street, etc.
I love how she gets it from both sides from you folks - she's too prissy AND she's too un-prissy. I'm with Lissa... it's funny.
To 7:18 pm, Didn't see the Doc with Kiefer and Rocco. I'll buy it and check it out.
I heard Sib was married before but for a short time, which doesn't mean anything if she is not an open gay. I know gay women who do this, especially the ones who like to throw family and friends off the track. Some do it because they can't pay the rent. Its easier to marry men too, that are away alot or men that have a busy career. Gay women can have sex with men, they just fake it & hate it. These women have alot of problems with alcohol and drugs. They also keep a distance from family, friends and co-workers. They end up very lonely. I feel so sorry for them!
I frankly didn't catch onto the pics with her dressed up and the ones of her on the street corner but point well taken. Yes, he doesn't really touch her like he's in love or in like. Just buddies. Again, they never lied to anyone, people just assumed. Just like they are assuming with Reiko.
I'm not sure with Kiefer. I thought maybe he was because of her but when I was researching him, his 2 wifes, pics & videos with so many women, it was Tricia who through me for a loop. Not even the golf girl (with the golf girl, he saw the camera person, said something in her ear and they just started to pretend, having fun with it) but Tricia. WOW! I have no reason why with her but I'm not sure how long he was with her. Big question?? He seemed to like her alot and respect her.
8:54, what is it about the photos with Tricia make you think he liked and respected her so much?
Of course, all women can do for themselves but if the women is going to act like one of the guys, she will be treated like one. Sitting on the sidewalk to have a smoke, where animals might go. Leave it up to a man and they will do just about anything and she followed Kiefer right down there. That's funny!
It's like when a guy opens a door for a lady. Its called common courtesy, politness, thoughtfulness, respect for the lady that you are suppose to care so much about. It's still done in this century. Is it possible Sib is a dike and doesn't like a man being counteous?
Maybe there's a few dikes here that don't get it.
Except for the honest open gay woman. I like you alot. Maybe, we can do tea sometime soon. Really!
This is funny! Didn't pick up on the 2 pics either. Now we see why she gets it from both sides from folks. Seems Sib is lacking in confidents, can't make up her mind whether to be too prissy or too unprissy. I guess sitting in the do-do gave us the answer to that question. Flopped her ass right down on it, just like a man.
Since when does a woman not like countesy from a man. I wonder who payed for lunch that day? Seen Kiefer with the silver tray in his hand. Maybe they went Dutch?
Only prissy when the cameras are rolling!
Big mistake in the pics where she is in the corner, all dressed up to kill, to handle that common countesy, of pushing his chair in so she can get out. Guess Keifer knows her better then we do. One of the guys, whether or not she is dressed up or down.
We all know who paid that bill........ Don't think Sib wants to go that far, in what she is perfectly capable of doing as an adult.
Sidewalk Pics. A guy is a guy when he is smoking. If Sib wants to smoke like Kiefer, she could at less be a lady about it. Good example of who she is. Smelly hair, smelly clothes, smelly breath, smelly home etc: etc:
Gay women can be ladies but there are some who like to act more manly. I guess we know which category to place Sib in.
Gee Christy I can answer that question about the photos/video with Kiefer and Tricia. Tricia is totally the opposite of Sib. Are you blind?
To the open Gay woman: not sure how long Kiefer & Tricia were together. Read that they were together when he was going to jail. Pics of them in July of 07. Heard he asked her to marry him, but she broke it off with Kiefer
"before" his DUI because of his drinking, she didn't want that life style because she had a child to consider. It was said, she was in that kind of relationship before. This was over heard, by a close friend of Kiefer's when he was in jail. It could be why he & Kelly filed for a divorce in 06. Not sure of dates. I think it was Jan 06 she was at the awards with him & The Letterman show.
To the Ugly-Hearted, Jealous and Intolerant Ones (and, no matter how much you bitch back at me, I have every faith that you know who you are):
One thing that I can tell you for sure is that, being the kind-hearted, tolerant and disgusted by bigotry person that he is, Kiefer would be disgusted by what you're posting. And he'd probably also feel a little bit sorry for you (as I do too) because you must be miserable inside to be able to spew the kind of hatred that you do.
It's sad.
Oh - and 10:07? Gee, no, I don't see (from photos or videos) that Tricia is totally the opposite of Siobhan... and my eyesight is just fine.
Why are people accused of being jealous, etc. when they are simply stating there opinions on a subject matter.
I don't understand why each individual can't just post their viewpoints without being judged.
I have asked the same questions about Kiefer that are being asked here and it's based on very solid reasoning. No jealousy or intolerance involved.
As for Kiefer's opinions on the matter, he is a public person and therefore questions and comments about every part of him and his lifestyle come with the territory. To be honest, I personally think it's both embarrassing and silly that people comment about his body parts and fur, etc. but yet some continue to do so. As for him being offended by anything said here, I also personally find it offensive that he states his opinions on political issues as we have seen in some recent interviews. Once again he opens himself up to all kinds of examination. That's part of selling yourself as an actor and using your fame.
Let's not be so sensitive about all things Kiefer epecially since we don't really know him personally.
I'm not really sure why SB has caused so many differing opinions between Kiefer's fans but I really can't remember any other woman he has been with causing so much controversy.At the end of the day it's not a good thing to let a third party(SB) cause all this fighting and bitching at eachother. Everyone is allowed their opinion on this woman without fear of being slated. Kiefer is a public figure and he knows that this type of speculation comes with the territory.He is his own person and I think that if they were having a relationship he would have just said so.My personal opinion is that they are just good friends, I think it's a strong possibility that she is a lesbian too but who cares?I don't think he is gay.If he was I think he would have come out a long time ago. My true feeling is that he just has not met the right woman.Like everyone else I wish him the best.
This site in my opinion is all about Kiefer. There were many subject discussed here. From his drinking problems, other relationships, his wifes, family, his divorce etc: Some people just end up throwing Sib into the mix of the discussions.
Frankly, I was interested myself on every bodies opinion on whether Kiefer is gay. I think every women should ask that question about the men they are dating, because I think about it when I meet an new guy. Some people just can't have an open mind about it I guess.
So I do agree since Kiefer is a public figure, making millions from the public, can state his political issues to the public. I feel, he can't have his cake and eat it too.
My opinion about Sib is the same, she is gay. She never touches Kiefer like a woman in love or the way Tricia did (whomever). Like the open gay woman said. Kiefer never said, to the public... "Yes I'm dating this woman" and it leaves people open to speculation. "He" left the door open! If he wanted to close it, he would. Stop making fools out of your fans, they are your bread & butter.
I agree with what has been said above, 7.14am, I really have thought during all of this that both of them have been having a good laugh at the fans although maybe he has'nt meant for it to come across like that but I think the pair of them have treat the press and the fans like fools over this and they need to get down off their high horses. If you are together just damn well confirm it and if your not stop sending misleading signals. Kiefer needs his fans and she has made a spectacle out of him as far as I can see.I agree, just shut the door on all of this once and for all! Just my opinion anyway!
Some people on this site really think we are jealous of Sib. They are the fools. I felt "mostly" everyone here have been talking about intelligent subjects. Like Peggy said, I don't recall anyone discussing the fur on his chest like other sites. I know myself I have read things on this site that actually taught me an few things, especially about whether a photo is old or new and to watch the post dates, etc:.
The first time I seen the pics of them together they looked fake to me and then the rest kept coming. Most of us knew there were just to many. Plus Kiefer knows, after being in Hollywood for 20 yrs, how to hide if he wishes to do so. He did leave the door open.
I also never recalled Kiefer trying to be so deceitful to his fans. We aren't asking for every juicey tee bit about his sex life but he can be a bit more honest then what he has about whom he is dating. What's the big deal! I'm sick of hearing "Oh that's personal" but its fine when they want to promote a TV show, their music, movies or their political views.
I guess the ring he is wearing is to be the next subject to spectulate about but I myself would love the Press to ask him "Did Rocco give you that ring?" He would probably fall off his chair or shit a brick! If the stone is Lapis like the fans are saying it is. It means...Friendship & Truth but also what the fans don't know, that there is a gay poem about it. That's funny!
It might not be a lie but it is what it is..... deceiving the fans who got him where he is today. Yea, come down of your high horse that the fans paid for and stop misleading everyone.
Would like to have the other humbled Kiefer back please.
Got cut off...Yea, come down of your high horse that the fans helped paid for and stop deceiving us.
I want our old humbled Kiefer back Please!!!
I hadn't been here for a few days and oh boy more comedy.
What spaceship delivered you aliens here?
A minute of seriousness to 1:20PM: are you really so full of yourself that you think Kiefer or this woman are living their lives thinking about you? Laughing at you? Why would you think that? Do you actually believe that you're the center of the universe? So bizarre.
I don't know who Kiefer Sutherland sleeps with but I guess you mean the poem Lapis Lazuli by Yeats? Yeah. The word "gay" in that poem doesn't mean "homosexual". Sorry.
Kiefer didn't just open the door but left it WIDE open for a LONG time to let people speculate. If anyone is to blame for all the speculation about him & Sib it should fall right into his lap.
Yes, he has been in Hollywood for 20 yrs., he knows how it works. He said, he felt a big wave coming with Julia but didn't move fast enough to get out of the way. Is that BIG WAVE coming again!
So why would he put Sib out there to be a target if he cared so much for her? Whether she is gay or not. He deceived not only us but her too, by putting her in the spotlight.
Do I feel sorry for her? Absolutely not!
She is old enough to know how wrong it was to deceive others but continued to do so, since I also agree they were playing with us from the beginning. Why Kiefer felt a need to do this, I'm not sure. Been together for awhile and NO touchy...touchy! Give me a break! They're probably both gay! They are using one another to hide the fact. How sad! When they become rich we become nothing to them until they want to use us again. His father told him not to get caught in an lie & what a big one in my opinion.
Kiefer should know not to fool his audience or it will end with alot of BOO.............S.
I would also like the old humbled Kiefer back. He was so cute, funny & cool! Not deceiving! Well, maybe a little bit.
Kiefer didn't just open the door but left it WIDE open for a LONG time to let people speculate. If anyone is to blame for all the speculation about him & Sib it should fall right into his lap.
Yes, he has been in Hollywood for 20 yrs., he knows how it works. He said, he felt a big wave coming with Julia but didn't move fast enough to get out of the way. Is that BIG WAVE coming again!
So why would he put Sib out there to be a target if he cared so much for her? Whether she is gay or not. He deceived not only us but her too, by putting her in the spotlight.
Do I feel sorry for her? Absolutely not!
She is old enough to know how wrong it was to deceive others but continued to do so, since I also agree they were playing with us from the beginning. Why Kiefer felt a need to do this, I'm not sure. Been together for awhile and NO touchy...touchy! Give me a break! They're probably both gay! They are using one another to hide the fact. How sad! When they become rich we become nothing to them until they want to use us again. His father told him not to get caught in an lie & what a big one in my opinion.
Kiefer should know not to fool his audience or it will end with alot of BOO.............S.
I would also like the old humbled Kiefer back. He was so cute, funny & cool! Not deceiving! Well, maybe a little bit.
You people are fascinating. Like a sociological experiment. you really think that Kiefer or this woman care that a handful of people are "speculating" about their love lives? How do people get that self-involved and delusional? I can't stop looking. It's like a trainwreck.
I guess a spaceship just landed another alien to this site to interfere in the gay lifes of Kiefer and Sib. I hope I'm from some universe. Wouldn't mine if it was near Superman! He is one sexy guy.
Looks more like a tidal wave has come and it keeps rolling in. Surprise so many people feel the same in their opinion about Sib being gay.
Never seen a guy wanting to cling to his smokes and phone so badly, instead of holding his girls hand. Why pick her? Seen Kiefer with better looking women then her too. Shown them alot more affection and respect. Sitting on the Sidewalk pic: What a winner! Just buddies in my opinion.
Seen alot of bizarre behavior from Kiefer with his drinking etc but this takes the cake. Probably just some kind of reaction after jail time.
Just glad to hear some intelligent comments instead of Kiefers fur as Peggy said.
Well, I guess I'll jump on my spaceship, circle the universe and hopefully I'll find Superman!
Again some of the comments are getting bitchy towards people who are just voicing their opinion and I'm not getting involved in that but I feel evryone has the right to say how they feel on this matter.As someone has said before, he needs the press and the fans when he wants to promote a movie etc and then behaves like this. To Lissa, I'm certainly not delusional and I don't imagine Kiefer or SB care about me at all but I do have the right to voice my opinion without remarks like those from you, which I felt were unfair.If you think this is such a train wreck and we are all aliens then the simple solution is to just switch off your computer.You are obviously just as interested as everyone else by visiting this thread so instead of making rude comments why don't you say something worth reading.
I agree that I think he has been going through some wierd stage in his life since the jail time and he has certainly had better women.They seem just like friends to me too.Someone said that they were together last year when she was still married.I really don't know if that's true or not but if she has left her husband for Kiefer then I think she maybe regretting it now, coz this guy isn't interested in her at all!Maybe thats the problem, he feels uncomfortable that she left her husband for him?If it is true.His behaviour is very odd,he looks for any excuse not to get close to her and he looks very unhappy when he is with her but guess we will just have to see what happens..In the mean time, any room in that spaceship for me??Superman sounds great right about now!
Stars become famous by people communicating with one another. Whether it's the internet, magazines, papers or Word of Mouth. Do you real think Kiefer would want this communication system to SHUT DOWN. His career would be over. The internet is not the only way people communicate about Stars, there is also a Social Environment out there. People talk. Just because you lack social skills doesn't mean everyone else does.
Your the alien from another universe and your life is the train wreck waiting to happen. So put yourself on that spaceship or a train, perhaps you'll meet up with a Psychologist along the way. It would be so nice of you to offer Sib a ride, after all she is a nobody. Kiefer is the Star here! I believe none of us have forgotten that for ONE SECOND.
Love Superman. Touche
Let's put them on the Train wreck, I'm beginning to like the Spaceship adventure too much!
Hopefully Kiefer will snap out of it and return to being Our Hero again.
It would be very hard to give up Superman. Shit, I think I'm woman enough to take them both on. After all, I do have the advantage over all you ladies! I'm the only woman here who has a spaceship. Men love adventure!
Still enjoying the comedy and the impressive point missing too.
we are living in a gay world ! Rocco is gay ! Siobhan is gay ! Kiefer is gay !
is anyone here is hetero ? don't have anything against homosexuality but some people here have a great imagination !
Some people in here have imaginations that just never stop!
Yes ! Just want to say something : Kiefer doesn't need to confirm he dates or lives with Siobhan, pics and videos talk for him.
But to read that this woman is gay is very funny and surprising. do you really think Kiefer would share his bed with a gay woman ? lol
JP
Oct 4th @ 8:35am - of course, celebrities need fans, but where you're missing the boat (spaceship... whatever), imo, is that you seem actually to think that the majority of Kiefer's fan are made up of people who give a damn who he dates one way or another.
Even among those fans (like myself) who find everything about him fascinating, you're not representative of the majority. You're representative of a relative few who, for whatever reasons, absolutely despise Siobhan and are 100% convinced that she's horrible for him. (Nevermind that you have so little respect for Kiefer that you don't believe he can decide who he spends time with - or not - all by his own grown-up self.)
Most of his fans, though, don't know or care anything about his personal life. Most people who can't wait for 24 and Jack Bauer to return just love his work as Jack Bauer... and/or have enjoyed his work in other things through the years and hope to see him in other things in the future.
The idea that the majority of people who enjoy Kiefer either as an actor and/or as both an actor and a person, have a strong opinion about who he spends time with or believe that he owes them anything that he doesn't want to share in terms of details about his personal life is just delusional.
Hey Christy. Hope you are having a good evening.
Just my two cents on the subject if anyone is interested, speaking as a big Kiefer fan myself I am interested in every bitty detail of Kiefer's life including who he dates, etc. It's just part of being a fan for some of us and as long as it doesn't interfere with real life there is nothing wrong or abnormal about that, IMHO.
I just think that it is part of being a fan and as a public person I think Kiefer expects it and understands it even if he doesn't like it or wishes it were different if that is the case.
Personally, I don't think Kiefer is so offended by all the analysis and speculation. He seems to like to keep himself in the public eye and talks pretty openly about himself.
He uses his fame to push forward bands that he loves and his political and cultural viewpoints. He uses his fame to get preferred tables in restaurants and VIP seating at concerts. I am sure he also enjoys lots of free gifts as a presenter at awards shows and things like that. With all of these benefits comes the speculation and analysis.
That comes with the territory and thank goodness he handles it all with class and continues to have respect for his fan base which he relies heavily on for support and success.
He hasn't always made the best decisions but he is a big boy and of course, wouldn't listen to any of us. Heck, I don't even think he listens to mom and dad, lol.
As for his personal life, etc. as I have always said as long as he doesn't abuse his celebrity for advantages or to influence peoples political opinions and things like that I say give him his space and privacy.
The end of your post got cutoff, but is that you, Linda? Hey! :)
I guess I wasn't clear. As I said in my post, I'm one of those fans who's interested in every aspect of his life too. Endlessly fascinated... curious... nosy... all of the above! :) I just don't think that those of us who are THAT interested comprise a very large percentage of those who would say, "oh, yeah, I like Kiefer Sutherland... he's great in 24!" or like that.
I don't think that Kiefer is offended by people talking about his life either. I agree that he understands that that goes with the territory. What I was referring to when I posted up-thread is that I believe that Kiefer would be offended *in general* by people talking about other people in ugly ways (i.e. using the word "dyke" to describe a lesbian, talking in an ugly judgmental way about someone they don't know, etc). From everything I've ever read or heard about Kiefer, I suspect he's the kind of person who'd be likely to say, "Hey, cool it!" when someone was being ugly/discriminatory (the word "dyke" isn't, imo, any better than the word that Kiefer said is his least favorite word in his Inside the Actor's Studio interview)... whether he knew the person the word was being directed at or not.
What I also was trying to say is that, even though there are some fans (like you and me and others here) who are interested in every detail, the person/people who post about how he's "lying" and say that he'll pay a price for that with his fans is/are, imo, delusional... because I don't think there are more than a handful of fans who feel that particular way about his personal life... either currently or in general.
Kiefer is selling himself to the public. He is also selling other things. People want to know whether he is a good investment they want to spend their money on.
It's called the internet. People can now check this person out or the merchandise out to see what's behind it. It's called progress. What some people were finding, were fake items and they were just wondering why when this product always seemed so genuine before and of course one thing lead to other. Now its a matter of opinion. Kiefer hates the internet for this reason but he loves the internet for others. Selling him & his items. Sorry, he might take a "BIG" cut in pay, but find another job if he doesn't like his personal merchandise on the internet being talked about.
Who said he doesn't like his "personal merchandise" being talked about? In fact, what ARE you talking about??
JP-How do you know Kiefer is sharing his bed with anyone at the moment at all?
Regarding a post about a week ago by Linda on why Kiefer's relationships don't last, I agree that I think alot of it is him. I think the bottom line is that he is scared of being hurt and has also never found the right person.He seems to be constantly looking for something else that doesn't exist, i.e the perfect relationship.Plus I also think that he enjoy's his freedom too much, it's a personal choice,some men just aren't made to settle down, although from interviews I have read I have got the impression that he wouldn't be against marriage again and that the third time maybe just the charm-but he would have to find the right woman first and unfortunately for Siobhan Zetumer, I don't think she is it. Just my opinion.
Natalie, i agree with you and as he said himself in the past he is a difficult person to live with.
But why do you think Siobhan is not the right woman ? I don't say she is or not, just curiosity...
Something has changed, even if he said he was single, we can see and i read on a forum that on 411.com, the zetumer address is the same of kiefer one. Strange for a man who likes to be single...Kiefer is not very honest. If he wants to protect his private life, i prefer he doesn't answer to questions about it .
I forgot about that address 3:08 and I agree that it is wierd but maybe she was living there whilst she sorted out her divorce?I don't know why I don't think she is right for him, all I can go off is the pictures that we have seen and he doesn't seem very interested at all. What I really don't understand is if they are together then why all the secrecy? I just kinda wish we knew yes or no because even though he has said he is single there is still a part of me that is unsure about the whole thing.If they are in a relationship then I can't see her being very happy that he is saying he is single because I certainly wouldn't be, but maybe that's just me.I can't even remember when they were last seen together,which of course doesn't mean that they are not seeing eachother just that they have not been photographed..Surely someone out there must know what's going on for sure..??Maybe I should just stop being nosey..but I can't wait to see the new 24!
Hi everyone. Such interesting and frank discussion which I myself love. Christy, that was me. For some reason post get cutoff sometimes. I agree with what you have said in your post.
As for Kiefer's relationships as I have mentioned before I think it is mostly Kiefer who undermines his own relationships. It happened w/Camilla and Kelly and even Julia. I personally have believed myself that Julia was the "love of his life" and he has blamed himself for the breakup and also has not found a match for her. It happens to some of us in real life too. It's just part of life and perfectly natural, IMHO. I also agree with Natalie and to even expand on her thought that I also believe that Kiefer is not only always looking for the perfect relationship but the perfect everything. He takes the word perfectionist to new levels. I think part of this is also because he had such a troubled youth that he doesn't really know how to be happy with the simple things. Hence, his comments recently about the children playing in South Africa. That is really foreign to Kiefer, I think because he doesn't know how to be happy and just enjoy the sweetness of the small things in life. He also seems to get bored with the routine of life, again just my opinion. If you look at his relationships with women they seem to last a few months and then poof!!....
As for his relationship with Rocco, I don't know what form it took but it did seem to come at a time in Kiefer's life when he may have felt alone and distant and just not very happy and maybe that friendship in whatever form it was gave him some outlet...who knows what it is today if anything at all since Kiefer seems to have pulled back from it at least for now.
As for Siobhan, I too have been in the camp that I not only don't like her, which means nothing at all to Kiefer, but don't trust her. First, I agree with all of those who say he doesn't even appear happy with her like he seems to with everyone else. I personally think he was excited about the relationship with her at the beginning which is why he was all too happy and comfortable to parade her out there like he did and also to spend every minute off from "24" with her. Now he almost doesn't want to be pictured with her, he doesn't come back so much in his time off and he doesn't want to address his relationship with her or anyone else at the moment.
I don't trust her because I have seen women like her in the corporate world where I work. Women who will do anything to get ahead. This is a woman who married a very well off man and received a high profile position at a major women's magazine seemingly right off the Chanel runway. Then suddenly she is divorced and picking up with a wealthier man who also happens to be famous. Either she is one lucky woman who just always steps in it or she is one fine manipulator; either is possible.
I don't think for one second that Kiefer would careless about my opinion about all of this but like Linda, I love a frank discussion. So some very good points have been made here I think. I also happen to think that Julia was the love of his life and that he was too young to appreciate what he had but I always feel that there is alot of regret on Kiefer's part over the Julia thing. She has moved on and has a family and husband and is settled in life,me personally would love to see him in a similar situation. I think possibly that he has what I would call "Peter Pan Syndrme" and that he just hasn't grown up, but I also think that he hasn't found the right girl since Julia.He gets so far into the relationship and then runs away scared from what I can see.I think he has had too much too young and has missed out on the little things in life.One thing I have learnt in ife is that the grass is never ever greener and there is no point in looking for things that don't exist,you are right Linda he is striving toward perfection.There I feel sorry for him because I'm not convinced he is that happy at the moment and I think he must have really had a hard time this year. Regarding Siobhan I wonder if he focused on her at the beggining of the year to take his mind off things?I also agree she is a woman who will do anything to get ahead.There is just something about her I can't quite figure out. I'm sorry if this offends anyone but it is only my opinion and I believe that in life you make your own luck.She has known exactly what she has been doing.I don't know if anyone here saw a video of her talking about fashion or something I think it was on Youtube, a friend of mine showed it to me so I'm not sure where she got it but Siobhan is talking about clothes and Allure I think and quite frankly I was shocked at how normal and not very attractve she is.nd she was a chanel model is that right?Thats why I think she has got where she is at 36 by someone helping her.Maybe the rich ex-husband?I do not believe she is where she is through hard work alone.That is just my opinion though.
I got cut off there.. and I was shocked by how quite unattractive and messy she looked so I believe she has had help from somewhere because there are better looking people around.Just my opinion. Does anyone know how they met? Have they been friends for a long time? Just wondering..
You might have me convinced Natalie except the part about Julia which happen many years ago. After her he married another beautiful woman.
People started to spectulate back in 06 after the Doc. ITUTKM about his relationship with Rocco. Jay Leno made a comment about saying something about a gay Jack Bauer. Then there was this guy's girlfriend in a bar who said, Kiefer actually tried to kiss the guy (her boyfriend) on the mouth but the guy pushed him away. There was another article where Kiefer was seen in a gay bar. He hasn't been back to the Leno show since.
In my opinion he seemed to go the distant with Rocco. He built the Studio in 03 but met Rocco in 02. Did he build the Studio for him? Took him to Japan with him without the rest of the band. Stayed in the same suite together. Had the tatoo put on his arm, we know what his tatoos mean. Followed Rocco all around on his tours while he was still doing 24. Alot of work & time he put in with Rocco, alot. He has been in Kiefer's life for 6 years. Its the way they would look at one another that got to me in the Doc and pics.
Kiefer wasn't in any relationship with any women since. Yes, he was seen with them in pics but not any major events since Tricia. In Jan 06 he took Tricia to a few events but nothing after that except a few pics of them at her daughters party in the bowling alley, just because we seen them kissing good-bye doesn't mean it wasn't a kiss of just 2 friends showing affection for one another. Again the paps & fans assumed they were a item just like with Siob.
To be continue because of space........
part 2 .......Sorry!
In my opinion he was just friends with them & with the other woman before. Maybe Julia find something out!
I feel he also had a relationship with John English. Kiefer said his marriage with Kelly started with a lie and here everyone assumed it was with another woman, when actually it was maybe with John English. He said, he hurt her alot with the lie but it seems like she got over it. I heard woman can forgive easier if its with another man more so then if its with another woman.
Sorry, but ever since the Doc. I will always have my suspicion that Kiefer might be gay. That's what it is to me "Suspicion" on my side. Trust me, I was abit shocked.
Kiefer has seen Rocco after his jail time and I heard Rocco was back in the Studio recording for 24.
In my opinion they are just keeping a low profile for now. To be honest I wish I never seen the Doc. If people wish to convince me otherwise that would be great.
OK I'm very surprised to read this post (11:28) and who is this John English ? and why do you seem so sure ?
Hey 11:10, you make very good points and it's hard for me to try and convince you otherwise. In fact, you are convincing me even more.
Was that Leno appearance that you refer to in April 2007 because I was curious why he didn't appear on his show this time around for Mirrors. I mean he did all the other talk shows. I was waiting to see what happens with the "24" prequel.
Also, Kiefer mentioned in one of the recent interviews that he is selling IW because the studio takes up his living area and while it was fine when the label started with one band (Rocco's) he felt now that with 4-5 bands it was too much. That made sense to me but maybe he was comfortable with the studio being part of his living area as long as it was just Rocco.
And yes, he did mention Rocco was back in the studio as he got him the gig of doing the theme for the "24" prequel.
I was also curious as to why Rocco would not attend Dave's wedding. We know Kiefer went and I assumed he took Siobhan since I think she was still in Malibu with him. Wonder why Rocco didn't go.
Look, if he is then I understand why he would be hesitant given his role, etc. to come out. However, ultimately I want him to be happy and not be hurt. I do see Kiefer making some lifestyle changes so maybe he is preparing for something. Who knows but the last thing I want is for him to stay with Siobhan or anyone who he may not really be happy with (btw, wouldn't be fair to her either). Now, of course, this is all speculation on my part but I still want what's best for Kiefer.
He seems to be such a kind and caring soul who is very creative and talented and well meaning. Here's hoping that he finds happiness in his life so he stays away from the drinking and doesn't find himself in trouble again.
12:38, John English was Kiefer's partner when he was on the rodeo circuit.
11:10, don't you believe that Kiefer truly loved Julia though. I know it was a long time ago but I am reading her biography and it states when they met and fell in love on the set of Flatliners there were inseparable. Also, in pictures they seemed very in love.
Kiefer's 1st marriage was falling apart because he was never home, he was even away for 6 months when she was pregnant doing movies back to back. They said, he was partying/drinking, wouldn't settle down. It was ok for her to have his baby but after that, where was he? She was busy with 2 kids. "Maybe" to get away from her, because he soon moved out.
Kiefer is from the old Hollywood where being gay was not the thing. Big NoNo!
Julia was young she was just starting her own career when she met Kiefer. She was just wrapping up on Pretty Woman & started Flatliners right away(or one of her great movies?)Pretty Woman hit the theaters & it was BIG. Remember he wasn't with her alot because he was still going away making movies & building a house in Montana. He went out partying/drinking without her. When she hit it big it scared Kiefer, he knew he would be in the spotlight way, way to much. He started drinking/acting up probably so she would call the wedding off. He moved out. He said, he needed to study for another movie & needed to be alone. Moved into a Hotel across the street from the Pool Hall & started visiting it more, maybe to start the rumors over Amanda Rice to put a stop to everything. He said, Rice and he were friends & took their kids to Disney etc. I believe this. Kiefer hated the pap/press back then, got into some angry fights with them. Too young himself to handle his situation(being gay)on his own, that it grew out of proportion.
This is just my suspicion of Kiefer's life. Wish it wasn't. I'm 1/2 & 1/2 on the issue.
John English and Kiefer met on the set of Young Guns I in Mexico. He was the Horse Trainer. Taught Kiefer how to ride a horse.
They met again (so he said) on the Set of Young Guns II when he was married to Kelly. Where English Trained Kiefer for roping on the rodeo circuit together.
Were Kiefer and English involved as far back to Young Guns I? Did he build a ranch in Montana far from LA for him and English? Then sell the one in Montana to build one in Ca. closer to work. It takes money to run a ranch and Kiefers career wasn't going anywhere.
Is this why everyone is confused about his lovelife with women?
Lots of questions which I can fill in but this is just spectulating and my ever lasting suspisions of his life as a gay. Its not nice speculating over someone else life but I'm curious like everyone else.
John English and Kiefer met on the set of Young Guns I in Mexico. He was the Horse Trainer. Taught Kiefer how to ride a horse.
They met again (so he said) on the Set of Young Guns II when he was married to Kelly. Where English Trained Kiefer for roping on the rodeo circuit together.
Were Kiefer and English involved as far back to Young Guns I? Did he build a ranch in Montana far from LA for him and English? Then sell the one in Montana to build one in Ca. closer to work. It takes money to run a ranch and Kiefers career wasn't going anywhere.
Is this why everyone is confused about his lovelife with women?
Lots of questions which I can fill in but this is just spectulating and my ever lasting suspisions of his life as a gay. Its not nice speculating over someone else life but I'm curious like everyone else.
Sorry...must have doubled my efforts.
I'm not positive when Kiefer met John English, but I actually think it may've been on the set of The Cowboy Way. By then, Kiefer already knew how to ride. He's always said that, though he fell in love with horses on Young Guns, he really learned to ride on The Three Musketeers.
The only movie that John English has a credit for in IMDb is The Cowboy Way. By the time Kiefer made that movie, he'd long since had the ranch in Montana.
Kiefer wasn't married to Kelly when he made YG2. He was with Julia.
Kiefer was married to Kelly when he bought the ranch in Santa Ynez.
I don't know what Kiefer's sexuality is, but there are a lot of factual errors in these posts. Another from a post above (don't know if it's yours or not) is that Kiefer and Jude started building IW in 2003, after they met Rocco. No. They started buliding IW in 2002, before they met Rocco.
Hi 4:17, just some information on the ranch in Montana. I re-read the portion of the bio on Julia Roberts regarding this matter and it states that while they were dating circa 1990 Kiefer purchased a parcel of land in Whitefish, MT and there he and a friend (no mention of friend's name) built a cabin on it. The author says that "the idea was for the place to be a bolt hole when the pressures of work or just being in the public eye become too much for either of them" so it seems he did this with Julia very much in mind.
Of course, we don't know how accurate bios are but most of the Kiefer stuff seems to be pretty consistent in the various books on her.
There is also confusion on the breakup. She actually did an interview saying that Kiefer broke up with her before she could break up with him. I've seen other reports where her agent called him. Kiefer has never provided detail other than to say it was mutual so who knows. As with all things Kiefer a mystery remains....
Interesting, Linda. I could swear that I remember Kiefer being interviewed, and saying that Julia ended the relationship and left for Europe with Jason Patric, and that Kiefer didn't see it coming. Anyone else remember him saying something like this, or did I dream that?
I've heard/read all of the above.
As with many things relative to celebrities (not just Kiefer), we can guess (and, of course, being interested, we *do* guess! :)) at what happened, but only the people actually involved and, probably but not even necessarily, people close to them in real life know what really happened.
I know for sure Kiefer met John English in New Mexico when Kiefer was doing Young Guns I, 1987-88 winter time because English owned a ranch there and this is where the guys went to learn to ride. He met up with English at another time in some cowboy movie (not sure of the name) I thought Kiefer said, it was when he did the rodeo movie when he was the clown. But, "I believe" he was with English up until (1987 until 2000 not sure of dates) they have an accident.
As far as the ranch in Montana. Kiefer did have someone with him when he went up there to build it. It was built on the side of a mountain. If it was English, it doesn't mean he was actually going to live with them, but again I believe Kiefer was already set to call off the wedding. English was probably in my opinion the one who showed Kiefer how to operate a ranch.
No, whatever the time frame is with the Studio Kiefer and Rocco met before. I saw pics of them before the studio was even done, they might still be out there, with them in Iceland. Know one at that time knew Rocco and the Studio wasn't announced at that time. I have the pics & you wouldn't know Rocco with the hat on his head. I'm always good at looking in the background of pics. Was the Studio done in 2003?
Your comment is right Christy, only Kiefer knows for sure.
6:50 I heard the same thing.
I'm 1/2 & 1/2.
Kiefer and Rocco first went to Iceland in December/January 2004-05 (i.e., they went right after Christmas and stayed over New Years Eve; a friend of my sister's met Kiefer flying home - by himself - not with Rocco - on January 3, 2005 in Cologne, Germany). That was Kiefer's first trip to Iceland.
The studio was started after season 1 of 24 ended, i.e. in 2002. I think Kiefer moved in in early 2003, pre-Rocco. ... and Rocco and Kiefer went to Iceland for the first time at the very end of 2004.
They really and truly did meet post-IW being built.
What year was the Studio complete and in the papers? Does anyone remember?
Linda...He did break up with her and went to the Hotel I mentioned saying he needed to study for a part and needed time alone to do it, plus emotional stuff going on. Things were not going well with their relationship. That's when the stuff with Amanda Rice happen. He told Julia they were just friends. Like I said, in the post above I believe Kiefer started all that just to break up. Kiefer said in a interview or mag. that he hates breaking up, because he doesn't want that person to hate him afterwards. I believe he deliberately does this by acting up in some way. He doesn't want to hurt anyone. Kiefer was probably telling the truth about Amanda Rice. I believe he hates himself for the hurt he caused Julia plus guilt.
Julia didn't believe Kiefer so she left with Jason Patric for Europe. I also believe Patric was telling her things.
This is just "my opinion" on how things might have happen because Kiefer got scared etc: (its above).
1/2 & 1/2
8:57pm, the pics of painting the outside of IW appeared in magazines in May 2003 and he'd already been living there at that point.
I have no idea who Kiefer's sleeping with now or who he's ever slept with, female or male, but he built IW before he met Rocco.
6.50, I heard the same thing too and Christy you are right he did build IW before he met Rocco.This is just my opinion but I really do not think that he is gay.I know how some people could think that because I have thought of the possibility but I really don't agree with all this John English stuff ether and I'm not sure how it's started. I feel that Kiefer can't really win at the moment, If he is seen out with a woman he is sleeping with her, if he doesn't commit then he is gay?I think with Kiefer he just hasn't found the right person and he is quite insecure, his parents divorced when he was young, he moved around,lived in the spotlight and I'm sorry but that will have an effect on him in later life.As for his relationship with Rocco, I think they are just good friends.I thought Rocco had a child anyway?Rocco said himself on the documentary that him and Kiefer had a good understanding of eachother because they both had parents who were away alot.Kiefer is passionate about his music and the band,he has really helped them and I think it's admiration that he looks at Rocco with, not love.Same with HoneyHoney, he looks at them like a proud parent. Let's all have our opinions but not make a mockery of something that Kiefer loves, his music. Just my opinion.
I haven’t weighed in on this discussion ... until now. As a public relations professional, I have a few things to say, and now is as good a time as any.
Now, let’s see ... first of all, in April and probably May, too, it was *definitely* Kiefer’s people who leaked information to the paps. There is no doubt in my mind, and my colleagues who follow Kiefer agree that the campaign that started on April Fool’s Day was from Kiefer’s end. Now, by that I don’t mean his publicist or other close PR advisors, I mean the Powers-That-Be at Fox. We also got the impression that Kiefer was dead set against the plan, but went along because he felt obligated to do so. Why? Well, for one thing, he looked really great in the days after he got out of jail; in fact I was impressed with how well he weathered the experience. After that, though, and certainly by the end of March, he looked stressed, uncertain, and even sickly. My friends and I even wondered what was going on with him, and then it happened, and we uttered a collective “oh, so that’s what the tension was all about, a PR campaign.”
After that, things get a little fuzzy. For example, no one that I know understands the whole ring thing. It’s been suggested by some people that a ring is just a ring, just a piece of jewelry. Maybe for you and me, but NOT when you’re dating Kiefer Sutherland, and NOT when engagement rumors are already swirling, and NOT when you’re at an obvious photo-op, which that luncheon in June clearly was (first thing off the plane from S. Africa, the P-T-B decided that the media/public needed to be reminded of Kiefer’s transformation with the appropriate girlfriend from NY, so that’s what he did). Oh, and BTW, don’t tell me for a moment that Siobhan simply changed fingers absent-mindedly; women don’t do that, especially under the circumstances described above. It was planned. The question is, was it planned with or without Kiefer’s knowledge and consent. Something definitely changed after June. Maybe she was trying to push the agenda because the next thing we know, his publicist denied the engagement rumors (very adamantly, considering the extent to which the media abandoned the story, and Siobhan, in the weeks following), the next weekend Kiefer was seen with another woman, and then Siobhan wasn’t seen for well over a month, and not until smack dab in the middle of promoting Mirrors. On the beach he appeared indifferent toward her and even slightly uncomfortable. His distance from her may have been his way of conveying his sentiment subliminally, which he has done in the past. One of the interesting things about following Kiefer’s public image is how adept he is at using the media to send subtle messages. And, it’s no accident that she wasn’t seen for the rest of August. He was seen by himself, with his dog, a pal, with a rash of positive stories about 24 coming back in November, all at the end of the month. No accident; those tid-bits were clearly arranged by the P-T-B.
But when I saw her wearing another ring at that Exhibition in NY, and clearly turning her arm to the camera to make sure it was highlighted? Well, maybe it was worn with his consent, or maybe she wore it against his urging. Then he shows up wearing a ring, and seemed eager to make sure it was photographed. Could he have been retaliating; sending a tit-for-tat message to Siobhan? Don’t know, of course, but I wouldn’t be surprised. Kiefer is extremely competitive, and if she did wear the ring against his wishes, he’s not above retaliating in some minor, symbolic way. I notice that his new ring is *obviously* a family/class/club type ring of some sort, and it looks to be an aged ring, at that. Certainly it’s not a wedding ring, at least that seems obvious to me, and it must have seemed obvious to the media, too, because I didn’t hear anyone making a fuss over it.
As for the tabloid articles, this is where I tend to agree with Linda (whom I don’t know, BTW), who believes that Siobhan has leaked info to the media. Especially the article that was linked yesterday on BB, wherein the so-called “friend” says that Siobhan has shrewdly manipulated Kiefer into doing things for his own good. If there was an official source for this story, which is very “iffy” (because it was factually incorrect and the source wasn’t named), it was a woman, and a friend of Siobhan’s. A man wouldn’t notice whether his buddy was being manipulated by his GF, shrewdly or otherwise, and Kiefer knows how to pick his friends by now, so they don’t talk about him ... ever! Also, only another woman would talk in such glowing terms about her friends ability to manipulate her famous boyfriend! The scary thing for Kiefer is that it takes one to know one, which means that Siobhan is manipulative, too. For those of us who don’t trust her (of which I am one), that’s hardly surprising. There was also the comment in a NY publication last February about Kiefer visiting his “lovely and hard-working” GF in Paris. Oh please, journalists don’t write that way unless they know the person, or someone else who does, so that story came from her side, which is important because I think it “outed” them as a couple by naming her (??). Other stories have just been typical tabloid nonsense, as far as I can tell.
Well, I guess that’s enough of me for now. LOL.
Suzanne
Suzanne, appreciate your insight especially coming from a PR perspective.
You are correct about that NY Observer blurb which actually appeared in March while they were covering Paris Fashion Week. This was the first time her name was linked to his.
The two(2) previous times only his name was mentioned including that curious initial Post Page.6 Blind Item. Post, of course, owned by Fox must have leaked that information to them in preparation of their "coming out" on April 1st. The Blind Items never ever mention their subjects by name and in this case they made an exception by throwing out Kiefer's name. They only referenced her as a "recently divorced fashion editor". The second of their sightings came during fashion week stating that Kiefer....was walking with a brunette.....This is the one that then led up to her name being given out and it was with that glowing description. Btw, at the time I thought maybe the person writing the blurb or covering the event must have surely been fond of her. To say the "lovely and hard working"....hmmmmm. LOL, sounded like something she wrote out herself.
Suzanne, the reason I have felt that she was leaking those blurbs is because although she is not the famous one she always comes off looking like the most fab woman on the planet as if people reading a gossip mag would be interested in her at all and to be honest Kiefer comes off looking like a total loser needing someone to pick up all the broken pieces and how is that good for his public image???
That is really interesting info from a PR perspective and maybe that is why he looks so unhappy and uptight when he is with her? I can't imagine him wanting to go along with something like that but as you say the powers that be wanted to portray a good image for the new series. If that is the case I feel very sorry for him and Linda I agree with you too. Why is she portrayed to be this wonderful woman who is picking up the pieces?What happened to the strong,kind Kiefer we all love?This woman is dangerous. I can understand why he would go along with this becasue he has no choice but any woman that goes along with something like that is nothing but nasty.The more I think of it the more I can think of many pictures we have seen where it is as though she spots the camera and starts playing up.Is it because she hoped his feelings would grow I wonder.I had never heard the quotes about her being hardworking from earlier in the year,is it me or does she hardly ever seem to be at work. Also I don't know if this has been discussed here, but how quickly did she get divorced?she seemed to be divorced by Jan but was still with her husband in the June,6 months isn't long or is that just me? It all seems very wierd to me.
Natalie
Hi Linda: I thought the Observer comment preceded the Post comment, and that the Post made its comment *because* the cat was already out of the proverbial bag, so they played catch up and published the siting after the fact. The Post tends to do that; for example, I think the siting of Kiefer and Siobhan having dinner in NY(that was published September 26) actually took place a couple of weeks earlier, which, btw, tells me that the PR campaign is still taking place with a sprinkling of public reminders that they are still dating (good thing the Post didn't publish the pic of them at dinner because -- to me -- Kiefer looked more than a tad bored). Anyway, I'll yield to your superior memory about what happened last winter as my memory is rarely to be trusted LOL.
I agree that Siobhan comes off smelling like a spring rose in some of these articles, and that Kiefer comes off smelling, as my grandmother would say, "like the last rose of summer with a bug on it." And I'm certainly prepared to believe that Siobhan or her friends would help manufacture such stories if it furthered her personal agenda (whatever that is). I was actually surprised that there was a Sept 22 story because most of those "resurrected-celebrity-saved-by-the-new-love" stories dried up after the engagement denial was issued in June. If she did go off script with the official PR campaign (with the ring and/or leaking stories), it's a risky strategy for her as Fox could be a powerful ally ... or foe. I also know that tabloids put out this kind of "resurrected-celebrity-saved-by-the-new-love" story as a matter of routine, so I don't know about that particular theme coming from her. Could be, but I'm not sure either way. That story didn't, however, come from his people, while I’d bet that the “lovely and hardworking” blurb did come from her side.
It's also become clear that, whatever Kiefer's reps said by way of a denial in the aftermath of the June ring-wearing incident, they weren't fooling around, and that a lot of one-on-one conversations took place with editors to explain the situation from Kiefer's perspective, and the media seem to have gotten the message. Notice that -- even when they have the chance -- fewer pics of her are now being taken, and almost none are being published in tabloids? That's not a coincidence. She's become -- at least for the time being -- a discounted commodity in the media. Compare the number of pics taken of them when walking in mid-September, with the number taken around that time with his buddy, or with his daughter. Far more, and in both cases they were published in multiple online tabloid spots. Again, that's not a coincidence.
Either way, this type of "she-fixed-him" story really gets under my skin because it discounts Kiefer's strengths, abilities (including his ability to think for himself), and other survivor/leadership qualities, and because it gives too much credit to a third party (whether that is her, or anyone else) for his successes. I despise those stories, no matter who sourced them, as I can tell you do, too.
Overall, and without a shred of direct proof, my gut instincts tell me that Fox pushed Kiefer into accepting a PR campaign that included the nice GF as part of a reformed Kiefer theme, and that he went along with it out of a sense of obligation to make up for his mistake. I also think that she, to some extent, is pushing the agenda forward, for whatever reason (i.e., more media exposure or to push their relationship forward), and he is now pushing back. That's my take, for what it's worth.
Suzanne
P.S. to Natalie; I liked your comment earlier about not making a mockery out of the music. Well put!
Thanks so much Suzanne for your input on all this. It's totally amazing to me to think this kind of thing goes on. I am with you and Linda, something has seemed odd from the very beginning with this relationship. Just looking at the way he interacts with everyone else, except her, makes it impossible to conclude he has any serious feelings for her. I certainly can't figure it out, LOL!!!
Suzanne, thanks again for all your interesting comments. I have to say that you are confirming and filling in the blanks for me. I knew from the beginning publicity was involved because Kiefer doesn't go to places like Pastis and Waverly Inn unless publicity is needed (see his dinner with Dad after the Emmy's at Mr. Chow's). I just can't figure out to what extent and if the relationship is completely born out of publicity or there is a real relationship and Fox decided to use it to all of their advantage.
I had a question for you because you mentioned that the dinner sighting in the Post recently was two weeks old. Are you saying that this was the sighting where we saw Kiefer sitting at a table leaning on his hand? If so, I agree with you that he looked bored in that shot, if not overly tired. But you couldn't see the person he was with so I was wondering if there is some other picture. Also, I know in Hollywood couples are fixed up for PR reasons and could see this here as well but do you think that is completely the case. If so, while I understand that Kiefer owes Fox for alot of his success, heck, most of his success and all of his wealth basically it seems sad to me if he has to resort to something like this. Normally I wouldn't be concerned at all but Kiefer is someone that I care about.
Natalie...I said, I wasn't sure either about the possiblity about Kiefer being gay. I really don't want to think its one. The time frame with IWS doesn't convince me about Kiefer & Rocco. They spent alot of time together! He could have spent that amount of time in an relationship with a woman instead of with Rocco. He would say "he didn't have enough time to get involved in a relationship". Just weird to me.
With Siob and what everyone was saying about them actually made me "believe even more" on the possibility of him being gay.
The only thing stopping me from totally believing, is the relationship he had with Catherine B. A gay woman on the site said, she thought Tricia but with me its CB.
If Kiefer is not gay, then I agree with what everyone is saying and hope he finds the right woman for himself because I see "NO" emotions from him with her. Sorry, some people will hate that answer but it's just my opinion. KS could really care for her.
1/2 & 1/2
Suzanne, why would you think that the photo of Kiefer that showed up around September 13th is related to the more recent dinner mentioned in the Post?
7:22pm, if he *is* gay don't you also wish him to find the right man for himself?
If he is gay then I wish him to be happy too of course I do. I think that Kiefer was friends with Siobhan, maybe was seeing her casually and Fox have suggested that they start been seen pictured together so it looks good that he is settling down. I don't think they are serious or genuinely together because he looks so unhappy.Maybe he was happy to go along with it at first but then she started wanting something more and he didn't.I'm with you Lysette, I can barely believe this kind of thing goes on and I feel sorry for those involved but it does make more sense to me than the prospect of them having a real relationship, as wierd as that sounds.Kiefer was pictured alot with her, we heard about them being together in Paris,NY,LA,London and SA.This to me makes it sound more like she was chaperoning him rather than because they were in love.I had a boyfriend who travelled alot for work and I barely ever went with him because I had my own commitments.That's why I find it strange that a fashion Ed, could take so much time off to be photographed.This isn't what you do if you are in a secure and happy relationship and you have a serious job.I would think that Kiefer would hate having to resort to such things but he does feel sorry for what he did last year and I think he will do anything for the studio because of guilt.Kiefer's a great actor, but this is one scenario whereby he can't act because he looks so unhappy.Maybe we did not see them pictured much for a while because it became obvious to the powers that be that the fans weren't fooled?Maybe the truth will come out in the end,maybe one of her fashion friends will come out and spill the beans on it all.
You make some great points Natalie.One thing I really didn't understand was the Malibu beach vacation. I can't figure out why he brought her out there, only to basically ignore her and even be seen with other women during her stay there. Makes no sense to me, and frankly, I think it reflects poorly on Kiefer.
Yes I know what you mean Lysette, I couldn't work that out either.He seemed to be trying to get away from her and the way he swam away from her when she touched his back, he was vey cold towards her. I think that she is either playing up to the cameras or is really desperate for him to love her and he just doesn't.But I hate to admit it but it doesn't make him look good, in fact it makes him look like a guy that is using her. If the studio wanted him to look good, well I'm afraid that they have made a mistake with this one. Just my opinion.
Lysette: Maybe the beach vacation was planned in advance of whatever change (I'm convinced) took place in their relationship (however defined) after June. Besides, it's her vacation, she can go to Malibu if she wants (LOL), and she probably knows tons of people in LA in addition to Kiefer. It certainly sounded from Shannon's descriptions that she had lots of friends there when Kiefer was working.
To Linda and Christy: I got curious about the restaurant siting because the Post didn't date it (other than the date it was published, I believe), and because it came out just before Kiefer would have been leaving NY to go back to LA for an event, and because I assumed that she would be in Europe for fashion weeks. So, I looked up the restaurant on the internet (sorry, can't remember the name of it now) and it looked to be the same restaurant as September 13. Sure, she could have flown back (or never left), and I could be wrong about the restaurant being the same, but, for what it's worth, that was my conclusion at the time.
Natalie: I think you've hit it right on. We know that she was one of several people he was dating in summer 07 and that he wasn't looking to get serious with anyone (as he said in a curious statement in an interview in Brazil that was posted on Penny's site), and then the DUI changed everything (I assume she was the brunette he was spotted with in NY several times in the fall). Linda asks the big question -- where does the personal relationship end and the professional relationship begin? I have a feeling that Kiefer was trying hard for a personal relationship with her earlier on, but, again, something changed after June. Whether she pushed the agenda, or he got bored, or he got frustrated with the PR thing, or he just got back to work and found his inner strength again ... or a combination of all of those things, I don't know. But I think he cares for her and wants to do the right thing for both of them, but he's caught in the middle of something he probably knew from the start wasn't right and that he wouldn't be able to stop esily. And if that's what he was thinking, he was right, mostly because I think she'll fight tooth-and-nail to keep him in her life and herself in the spotlight as much as possible (this last bit sounds unkind, but it's sooooo obvious to me that she loves the camera/attention). I feel sorry for Kiefer because I know how much pressure he would have been under from the P-T-B, and within himself, to right his mistake.
BTW, as we get closer to Redemption’s airing in November, you may see more of her. So, if you aren’t crazy about her, brace yourself. LOL
Suzanne
Yes I know what you mean Lysette, I couldn't work that out either.He seemed to be trying to get away from her and the way he swam away from her when she touched his back, he was vey cold towards her. I think that she is either playing up to the cameras or is really desperate for him to love her and he just doesn't.But I hate to admit it but it doesn't make him look good, in fact it makes him look like a guy that is using her. If the studio wanted him to look good, well I'm afraid I think that they have made a mistake with this one.
I'm not sure who made those comments about the curious Brazil interview because I couldn't see the end of your post sorry but I think you have made some good points there.What was the Brazil interview? Many of us seem to be thinking along the same lines anyway which is quite interesting.About the vacation, you could be right in your assumption, I wonder if they have alot of friends in common,maybe that is how they met?I think they have had a personal relationship at some point but I don't think that they have for a while now I also think something changed in June or May after she was making a spectacle of herself in the park in LA.Even I felt embaassed for her.I'm surprised that no gossip magazine picked it up becaue it really was embarassing...I'm of the belief that this is now a "relationship of convenience".Although I'm not convinced she knows this.
I would just like to say how much I appreciate this informed and reasonable conversation we are having here now. So many things are falling into place now. I have never thought he looked very interested in her at all. That was my only reason for disliking this whole thing. I hate the thought that he would be "persuaded" to live his personal life in a way that is not of his choosing, in order to make the PTB happy. ugh!
I only hope he does not bring her along to his new home once it's done and he's ready to move in.
Hey Suzanne,
I feel you are spot on and you confirmed one of my worst fears for Kiefer as far as this relationship goes. Well, my worst fear is that Kiefer ends up marrying her (which I believe she is aiming for), but my next fear is that she is not going to go away easily if at all and certainly not without a push from Kiefer.
If she is living in that West Village apartment it won't surprise me if once Kiefer moves into his house he doesn't leave her the apartment but aside from that I think she will require a big payoff and I am not even sure that will do it. I have wondered and maybe from your PR perspective you can shed light on this if that wasn't what may have been behind such a blunt engagement denial and these subsequent denials from Kiefer about any engagement or serious involvement with her. I mean given that she is a known person in her Fashion World you would think people would talk, right? I have actually thought maybe he is trying to embarrass her out the door. So in addition to that denial being used to send out word to the industry he was trying to give her a push. Knowing how Kiefer hates to hurt anyone but at the same time knowing that he wants to protect himself and his image he is going to be finding himself in a very sticky situation with her. Does he risk angering her to the point that she speaks badly of him, etc. Does he just ignore her which he appears to be doing in hopes that she just gets tired of it and leaves on her own (here, I feel he is wishful thinking)...I think for now he will try to keep the peace with her. Hence, his accompanying her to that Michael Thomson Event. He didn't look very comfortable being at her work related event and taking pictures with her. What did you think of those? He does give off an appearance to me going back to the end of June pics of them having lunch of a man who is abit annoyed, for lack of a better word, to have to be in her company as if it's forced.
I feel the same Lysette, somehow things just kind off seem so obvious now that it was staring me in the face but I have felt very confused over all of this since we first saw them together but now,especially after the PR comments by Suzanne I think, somehow it has all fitted into place.I'm really glad we are all having a decent, sensible debate too without getting insulting towards eachother.If he had looked happy from the beginning then we all would have been happy for him but he just didn't and I really hope that she doesn't move in with him.I think what we have to keep remembering is that he has made the statement several times that he is single.
Whoever has just written that last post before mine is spot on! Kiefer is doing the typical man thing of avoiding confrontation and hoping she just goes away! But I doubt she will easily,it appears that she really wants to get her claws into him which I think will only make him run further away.And I wondered myself why no-one seems to be talking or maybe they are, wish I worked in the Allure office I bet this has been discussed more than once.I really would like to know how she must have felt to have heard that he so blatantly said that he was single,I suspect that came as a shock to her but again I'm just speculating.
I enjoy speculation but the amount of speculation going on here is getting a bit much. There is a big difference between fact and speculation a distinction that I think is getting lost here.
I think people are just stating their feelings. There are so few places we can do that these days, which is why it is so refreshing to be able to speak our minds here without being harrassed and ridiculed.
To Anon. 10:13: As to the recent discussion I’ve been involved with, sure, there's speculating going on here, but we're trying to draw conclusions from facts that are publically available (as we read them from our knowledge and experience), and we're trying to be fair and honest, and we're not throwing out nasty and irrelevant personal attacks that don't support what we're theorizing about. But your right, the conclusions we are drawing from our observances are speculative (without knowing anything first hand, how can they be otherwise) and we should be careful to make that point at regular intervals. Thanks for the reminder about that.
LINDA ... Again I'm just going on my gut instinct here, but I agree that Kiefer didn't look comfortable at the Exhibition. I wish I could come up with something definitive to point to as proof of this, but I can't; it's just my sense that he was uncomfortable in those pics. Let's put it this way, if I or one of my colleagues were advising him in a PR capacity, I'd tell him to "show up" or stay at home, because to me he looks far less than enthusiastic in that set of pics. Also, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if his advisers are pulling their hair out and telling him the same. LOL
Suzanne
I have an theory of my own that I would like to share. Suppose just Suppose, Kiefer & Siob are already married & Fox wants them to keep it underwrap until after 24 starts up again in Jan not Nov. Suppose when KS was in jail, he decided he still liked her alot & decided to go see her in NY & start something up to see where it would go? He's liking her more & more & starts flying in/out of NY to make sure. He falls in love. After his divorce is final, he pops the question. She of course says,YES! They decide that he will spend 6 months in NY if she spends the other 6 in LA because of work. Allure has a base in LA, she talks this over with her boss/they agree 6 months NY & 6 LA.(This is why we don't see her). 24 already had plans set for June to go to S.Africa, so Fox helps them set up a small private wedding there/on the beach in Malibu,(wherever). They decide to spend the summer in Malibu as a honeymoon because Kiefer wants to wrap up 24 before Jan so they can move back to NY(the 6 ms. are up Jan).Why else did they work all summer this year? Kiefers contract I believe is up this season/I haven't heard anything,on a new one. Maybe they will wait to see if an audience likes 2 or the ratings. But no matter what happens with 24 this season, Kiefer will announce they are married & go on from there. To see if he will still retain his women fans etc:.The ring(Pics) she had on her left hand I think was a diamond and on her right it was a band. When they got married they of course switched the rings.(Pics)He had a ring on his left hand. I really don't believe Kiefer would do that unless he is going with someone or is married. Why does he look so sad because he doesn't like to pretend about things that are so real to him? The denials about the engagement? Because they weren't engaged when the question was asked but already married. Kill me later when I'm "90" OK or did you like Rocco & the Kiefer theory?
Just my "THEORY" 1/2 & 1/2
got cut of... The denial about the engagement rumors... because they were already married. Kill me when I'm 90 OK or maybe you like the theory about Kiefer & Rocco better?
My theory 1/2 & 1/2.
Yes, Christy... Kiefer & Rocco would also make a very nice couple because they enjoy music so much and I believe alot of the songs were meant for Kiefer that Rocco wrote.
For Suzanne
New Idea...article Sept 22
Kiefer Sutherland:Back from the brink...
In my opinion someone messed up Big on this article about Kiefer. It sounded like "Oh Poor Kiefer" but "Hello Wonderful Sib". Did they not realize that she's a Smoker (pic Hello Corner Sitting) & Drinker (pic Hello Hot Dog Stand). If I was Rupert Murdoch that reporter would have been fired.
New Idea was started by Rupert Murdoch who is the head of News Corportion who owns Fox network, Fox studios, National Star (supermarket) tabloids papers, The New York Post, Page Six, The Sun, The Times, Askmen, MySpace, Photobucket, HarperCollins books, Rotten Tomatoes etc; They own TV stations, Newpapers, Magazines, Websites, all kinds of Media. Fox is everywhere.
Rupert Murdoch is an Australian with sister companies there and throughout Europe. Came to the US and bought Fox and the above. US headquarters in NY on 6th Ave.
He also has dealing with 7 Media Group who owns Yahoo7, the online website New Idea at Yahoo7.
It's a Small World after all!
LOL "wonderful Sib", she is perhaps cute but she's not so perfect : she was married when she began dating Kiefer and she was not here to stop him drinking that night before his arrest. Maybe they fell in love each other and they have a serious relationship but to say Kiefer has changed thanks to miss perfect sounds very exaggerated.
8.09 anon. Dont think they are married . I Dont think Kiefer would keep that imformation from his fans.. hes got no reason to hide anything.
The man is 41 and is in control of his own life. He doesnt need Fox to make choices for him . I just dont buy it.
If Kiefer says hes not engaged and is single( whatever that means) then I believe him. Kiefer has always said his fans are his bread and butter.so I dont think he would tell fibs just to keep Fox Happy.. and to add to this The Malibu beach pics certainly didnt look like they were on a honey moon to me!(LOL)
Absolutely. Maybe the NY pics were a PR thing since he just got out of Jail . but hes not going to let a TV network run his life because of a mistake.
Teh ring Kiefer wears is an signet ring hes had for years.
Ive got a hunch he wears it on his left hand cause maybe it doesnt fit on his right. (Ive done that myself).. but if Kiefer was married he would say so.
Dont know what the big deal is about Sib ? He was with Catherine Bisson for five yrs and no one made a big fuss!
No, I don't believe they are married because in a recent interview (don't know the date) Kiefer said, he is single and liked it that way and he was having fun etc: Don't remember word by word.
But I don't recall how old the interview might have been? I need to check!
8:09, While anything with Kiefer is possible I think if he were married then why would he have to keep it a secret. I would think Fox would be pleased with that even more than him dating her, don't you?
And why would his fans care if he were married. There is certainly no reason to keep that information from us. In fact, as some have pointed out he stated in the interviews he did for Mirrors in July/August that he is not engaged and is single (his own words, not mine).
Doesn't really make sense from any standpoint that I can see.
P.S. I agree that the pics from Malibu certainly did not look like a honeymoon. He looked happiest to me when he posed alone, LOL....I tend to go with publicity shots on many of those Malibu pics anyway. Kiefer looked like he was posing for sure or at least trying and succeeding to look his best in those shots!!
6:56, the ring that Kiefer was photographed wearing twice recently isn't his signet ring. Who knows what it is (besides a very beautifully made piece of jewelry) and I'm not suggesting that it's a wedding ring, but it's not a ring that he's ever been photographed wearing before.
Also, anyone who's wasting any energy at all worrying about the veracity of the Australian "article" needs to stop wasting energy on it. ;) It's the dictionary definition of made-up tabloid fluff.
Who knows what is or isn't going on in Kiefer's life, regarding Siobhan or anything else, but that article doesn't know either.
Sorry, but I don't buy into this PR stuff with Fox wanting Kiefer to show a better image of himself with Sib.
Kiefer had alot of problems in 04 with filing for a divorce in April (I think that's what he filed for, even though people have said, "No" to this) and in May 04 he recieved a 2nd DUI. I didn't see any pics of Kiefer with a woman then,to clean up his image. He wasn't going with anyone special. Lots of disorder conduct with him in 04 but yet Fox went on and gave him a 3 year contract and tons of money to boot. I know it wasn't jail time but there were some pretty bad things going on with him back then.
I have heard "NASTY" sells in Hollywood. What does Suzanne think of that comment? Is it true?
If anything is going on with Siob, I believe they are just friends helping one another. Kiefer is staying at her place until his new place ready. Kiefer did comment on being single and having fun with it.On BB site a interview with Kiefer about 24...They don't want to do a 24 Movie until the series ends, which could be as early as next year.
Maybe after everything is said and done they did get married and just want to keep it to themselves for awhile. If 24 does end next year he will be starting a whole new life. Only he knows, what's in his future...
Everyone has very good points about Kiefer not being married. I said, lets suppose because the ring is the issue and I have "never" seen it before. It's not because it doesn't fit because he wouldn't wear it, if that was the case.
Kiefer in My Opinion would never ever wear a ring on "that hand" except if he was going with someone or married. He is romantic and old fashion in that regard. Maybe Rocco gave it to him in friendship of course...He's a poet.
If not, then Siob...
The ring is in QUESTION?
1/2 & 1/2
anonymous from 6:56, i agree with you Kiefer has been on and off with Catherine during about five years but he was still married . Now, he has divorced from Kelly, everybody thinks, even medias, he's gonna married Siobhan.
Maybe he will who knows but i don't think he is already married.
Now, for his ring, i've never seen it and i am convinced it's a present from Siobhan, i don't know why but it's her style. And, i'm afraid it's a sort of an engagement ring.
Don't mean to repeat myself and of course, anything is possible and maybe Kiefer plans to marry Siobhan in the future but I don't understand why someone would suggest he is already married. Kiefer doesn't get that much attention that he has to keep his marriage under wraps. I mean it got out that Beyonnce and Jay-Z were married and they are way bigger; they didn't try to hide it. What is the sense of that. Stars only hide dating and romancing not marriage. Once they are married it's over and done with and official so who cares. Also, to suggest he may already be married is to call him a liar since he said from his own lips as recently as during the Mirrors interviews that he is single. I don't think Kiefer is a liar, just saying. Btw, IMHO, that is very different than a PR campaign. He is not lying cause there is nothing to say about what is going on. People are making their own judgements based on the pictures of them not from anything Kiefer has offered.
Even though Kiefer had problems in 2004 this time was very different. First off it was the second time since he is contracted with Fox and doing "24", it violated his probation and it happened after a Fox related event and of course, there was jail time which fortunately didn't hinder filming but very much could have. All of these would have made it much more dramatic and urgent in the eyes of the Fox Executives who have poured lots of money and advertising into Kiefer. They have much vested in him at this time. Shows aren't doing as well and he is an integral part of "24" success. If people are angry with him about his behavior they may take it out on the show. I would be willing to bet that in the discussions he had with the Fox people after the arrest included lots of promises from Kiefer that he would "clean" up his act and would in no way jeopardize the show or provide any further bad publicity for the Studio itself.
Hence, IMO, the PR drive which Suzanne has outlined for us.
8:43, it very well could be a present from Siobhan. However, it could also be a gift from a friend, from his dad, it could be a family heirloom piece, it could be something he had made for himself, it could be something that has been laying around in his jewelry box (remember, he is moving and maybe packing so it's possible he came across it out of the blue), and it could be a hundred other possibilities.
Do we know her style? And, is there such a thing as an engagement ring for men, LOL?
This is just my opinion but I really don't think he is married. As some of you have said,why keep it a secret?I think it is a friendship ring or a present from his Dad. I don't think it has anything to do with Siobhan but thats just my view. 8.43AM, I'm curious, How do you know it's her style?Do you know her?I agree that he would wear something important on that hand but he cares very much for his family and friends and I think it's more likely from them. Could it be a present from his daughter?He has had a very bad year, maybe its to symbolise something like a new beginning?Or maybe he just bought it because he liked it!! Wouldn't that be the obvious answer?Maybe it only fits on that hand.I think the specualtion over the ring is getting abit out of hand(pardon the pun) as we really don't know.Kiefer has always been honest with his fans and the media.He wouldnt say he was single if he was married because he would just make himself look bad when it all came out.I don't think this woman is important enough to him to wear something she bought for him on that hand AND he has said on a few occasions that he is SINGLE!The thing is, I do think this woman likes the media attention and by us talking about her so much I feel we are giving her exactly what she wants.Just my view anyway.
Linda, you posted around the same time as me there so it looks like we were thinking the same things lol!
And I really don't think there is such a thing as an engagement ring either and I really can't see Kiefer wearing one!
Just wanted to add my thoughts to what Suzanne has been saying and I hope she continues to provide her input...but I don't only believe this image campaign for Kiefer includes a stable relationship, however real or unreal it may be, but we also have the many pics on the beach of Kiefer looking fit and fabulous (you know, walking the dog, running, swimming); the endless candid interviews; the staying out of sight as far as bar hopping, drinking (with that one slip up being the club which I don't think Kiefer expected to be photo'd there - btw, those pics were followed by a slew of beach pics over the next few days all stating how wonderful he looked which HE DID!!!; and the fanfest attendance, etc.
All positives for Kiefer. So whether they are designed by Fox which Suzanne has suggested or Kiefer himself there is no doubt in my view that Kiefer has made every effort to show himself in a more mature and serious light.
LOL Natalie, I saw that!!
Me neither Natalie on Kiefer wearing an engagement ring. I believe he has worn some sort of signet ring on that finger though so we know he would do that....
Maybe I'm totally out of mind, but I just had a thought following all this PR-thing: Kiefer rented this house in Malibu only for August - I talked to the real estate-manager, he told me, that Kiefer rented the house for one month, and before him there was lady, also a star, who rented this house for six weeks - and the photogs already took pics of kiefer on Wednesday, August 6th (as far as I remember) - I was at this beach nearly every day and the paps only showed up at the weekends, during the week there were only a few people at the beach, nothing interesting for photogs - so maybe - just a thought - this stay of Kiefer with Sib at Malibu was part of this PR-thing, the paps got informed, so the whole world could see, how "happy" Kiefer is, and how "serious" about beginning a new life and everything? The way he behaved when he was at the beach with her - I really couldn't see any love and I'm wondering all the time, why they were living there together.. But maybe it's just wishful thinking...
Shannon
8:00 I also heard that Nastiness sells in Hollywood but of course Suzanne would probably know the answer to that question better then I, but I think, in my opinion Kiefer going to jail goes beyond that.
10:49 I believe some of us also forgot the hate mail people have mentioned on this site that Kiefer recieved when he was in jail. If we are to believe this, which in my opinion I can. If you look at it from their point of view, I know, I would be with them on that issue. Just how much Kiefer recieved we don't know but they are very passionate about their cause. Plus Kiefer mentioned it on The Lettermen show.In conclusion with that BIG issue of Drinking & Driving. I agree Kiefer needed PR action. I know Kiefer is also going to try & control his drinking problem and not drive in the future.
Maybe he just wore the ring so he would look nice in the professional photo shots he has done every year for 24. The ring did match his outfit. Do men really know which hand to wear a ring on? I'm sorry, I thought Kiefer did since he has been married twice. I believe Brad Pitt wears a big ring like that on his left hand. This is why it is still a question with me.
1/2 & 1/2
Married? Humm ... Let's consider the logic. You want to remain secretly married, but you wear a wedding/engagement ring, which in turn directly forces you and your reps to lie your proverbial asses off with denials about whether or not you're married/engaged. Doesn't make a whole heck of a lot of sense, does it? LOL. Let me put it another way, if they are married (or engaged), and he's been lying to journalists about it, when they find out he will incur a wrath from the media that'll make one of Jack Bauer's bad days seem like a walk in the freakin' park. Frankly, I think Kiefer's too honest with - and respectful toward - the media, and the institution of marriage, for that matter, to play such a game.
In addition to the possbile sources of his ring - as Linda and Natalie already listed - and if it's not a promise ring of some kind, and there's no reason to believe it is (i.e., he's worn a signet ring on that finger many times in the past and it just looks like a "guy" ring to me), then I might conclude that he's sending a counter message to Siobhan's ring-wearing efforts, which is to say, "see, a ring is just a ring, and I can wear one too, everybody just calm down." I don't know, but either way I think his timing stinks because, whatever the reason, it's just not a good idea for him to wear a ring on "that" finger right now ... period, full stop.
BTW .. I never said that Fox is "running his life." I merely presented a case that his public persona might be in the process of being re-worked, and that the process of doing that might include Siobhan, who I definitely believe he has/or has had a personal relationship with. There's a big difference between altering his public persona and "running his life." I don't believe for a second that Kiefer would let anybody run his life ... nor should he!!!
Suzanne
Shannon how lucky girl you are ! You have seen Kiefer! I'm very interested about your point of view as the other fans.
Some fans think that the people who tell there's nothing between her and Kiefer are jealous. LOL.
What was his behaviour towards her ? did he show her some affection ?
Thanks for you answers!
a very curious fan !!!!!!!!
Why can they lie about the PR stuff but not about being married? In my opinion it is all misleading, deceiving and a lie is a lie to the journalist and fans.
12:42 I've seen him twice with her and friends at the beach - from my point of view he seemed to ignore her: it looked like he barely spoke to her, looked at her, no touch, no smile, nothing - mostly like she wasn't there at all.... When they stood together, talking with their friends she had her arms crossed, he was holding some bottle, as I said - no talking to each other, only to the friends, no touch, nothing! And I really was trying to see if there's any PDA to see... Maybe you've seen the video of Kiefer swimming, with Sib trying to touch his back - that was one of the days I saw them, I also saw when he went straight back into the house without "seeing" her - it was so weired! And I'm really wondering why he lived with her - it just doesn't makes any sense - at least not for me!
Thanks a lot Shannon. I think she is more into him than he is into her. And we all know here : Kiefer likes his freedom... So, i wonder if he's really ready to marry again.
Suzanne, that is how I have thought too that Kiefer had a real interest in Siobhan and was trying to make a go of something and Fox thought it would be useful. That was the only way I could explain his "coming out" at Pastis in such a big way on April 1st. That was very un-Kiefer like to me and that is what got me started on this relationship being fake in a way. I never got the sense it was real but in retrospect I think it started out real and digressed. Maybe I am totally off, who knows.
However, somewhere along the line, and maybe this is because he has lost interest in Siobhan and this relationship, he doesn't appear to be so agreeable anymore. It has appeared to me since around the end of June that he is meeting Fox halfway only agreeing in some instances to keep this relationship stuff alive but not really being so into it as to show affection, et. al. to Siobhan. I do believe Siobhan is very much into continuing on and therein lies the resentment I feel he shows towards her, IMHO. Also, his statements regarding no engagement, being single and loving it, etc. almost seem to be payback towards her. Not sure but that is how it looks to me. Kinda of a way to push her out the door if you will.
Maybe he is feeling more confident and self-assured these days and doesn't need to depend on anyone or maybe he is tired of playing the games. I don't believe Kiefer is a deceitful person on purpose and I bet the reason he doesn't mention Siobhan at all is because it isn't a secure relationship right now and may not be in the future and he would rather not mislead.
About the ring: Didnt he go shopping for jewelery with Sarah in NY recently? maybe he brought it then? Maybe Sarah picked it out?...just a thought.
Kiefer wore the ring at 2 Events after the interview about him being single. I believe Kiefer was making one Powerful statement,"that he is off the market". His PR's are at every Event and it is their job to make sure Kiefer looks picture perfect. They would have said something to him about being on the wrong hand. This was no mistake, not from Kiefer anyway. His a smart guy! He wants these pics in the papers, etc: with that ring on his finger.
What do the freakin' Journalist or the Media know? They mess up stories all the time. How many times have we seen that happen? Too many to count. Why haven't they seen this and made an comment on it? Too Slow! Its been out their for a few weeks now. No interest in him, maybe.
I believe the other rings he wore on the left hand also meant he was off the market. Some when he was with Kelly, etc:.
3:54, why don't you put your name, LOL.
You could be right but why make that statement that he is not engaged and single and enjoying it, etc. then wear a ring making a statement that he is off the market. Seems silly to me and who cares anyway. Again, why be deceitful. I mean Siobhan seems to be wearing a ring on her ring finger also in the pics we've seen of her (although that's been the case since June and he has appeared at many public events since then w/o one)so maybe they are commitment rings that they exchanged but I haven't seen anything from their behavior to show this (certainly not from his body language and Shannon has given very descriptive accounts here and elsewhere of their behavior towards one another and there were no photogs). Suzanne gave us some good explanations for the ring wearing but I guess as always time will tell.
Also, I guess I would have to research the pics but I believe he wore that signet ring at times when he wasn't with anyone. Btw, I really do think the ring could be a special family piece as well and yes, he was in a jewelry store in his last NYC visit prior to these 2 events so it's possible he picked it up then.
We'll just have to wait to see if someone ask him about it and how he answers.....
Suzanne, one question to you that you say it is bad timimg for him to wear that ring and I sorta agree with you unless as the poster here says is correct that maybe it's some sort of "off the market" statement. I guess that is always possible but do you agree with me from a PR perspective that this would create a situation where he is then lying or misleading.
1. Would you agree that is what he would be doing by saying one thing and doing another;
2. You would think him wearing a ring on that finger would bring more questions although no one seemed to ask him any relationship questions at this event.
It is interesting that he chose to wear it at a Fox related press event.
although, he did wear it at a charitable event a few days earlier as well.
As always, Kiefer has me confused, LOL
It looks to me that it has an old worn look to it so maybe it isnt new..
Anyway had to laugh at the bit of fluff article on pennys site(Kiefer back from the brink)that he plans to give up smoking..and that sib is changing his ways. Didnt they know she smokes too!.. shes hardly going to persuade Kiefer to quit!.... Tabloid fluff!
Some really great comments here, I would like to add a few myself.I think many of us seem to be thinking the same things which is interesting.I also work in PR and agree with Suzanne, she has said pretty much what I was thinking and I very much think this is all staged.The ring,personally, I do not think is anything to worry about.If it was a plain band then yes worry but it isn't. He probably should not have worn it but I feel that that is the rebel coming out in him.I also agree about the smoking, that article was a load of bulls***.Smoking hasn't done Siobhan much good as without her sunglasses she looks dreadful.Also Kiefer is not an alcoholic,he is a binge drinker.There is a massive difference.My father was an alcoholic and alcoholics cannot have a normal life.Kiefer would not be able to do what he does, working, travelling etc if he was an alcoholic believe me.I'm not saying he doesn't have some kind of problem but he most certainly is not an alcoholic.I suspect his problem is more learnt than anything else.What did Shannon see?Can anyone tell me?there is so much on here I cannot find her post but it sounds as though she got to see exactly how they are together.I think I would be able to tell more if I saw them in the flesh but from a photograph I agree that it looks very staged and when they left Pastis together that was definitely pre-arranged! I must admit and I feel awful saying this but she really is a woman who I cannot warm to.I get very bad vibes from the photos I have seen and I have a very good instinct about these things.I can understand completely why everyone feels the way they do.Has any "dirt" been dished on her yet?I feel Kiefer has become abit of a victim of his own success here,everyone Siobhan,the PR people, FOX, all have ulterior motives.I wonder how he really feels?I have always felt that he has ait of a tortured soul tbh, he never seems to be completely happy.I would really love to see him settled down with a nice woman and put his boozing and womanising behind him.
Thanks Everyone, Edika
Some really great comments here, I would like to add a few myself.I think many of us seem to be thinking the same things which is interesting.I also work in PR and agree with Suzanne, she has said pretty much what I was thinking and I very much think this is all staged.The ring,personally, I do not think is anything to worry about.If it was a plain band then yes worry but it isn't. He probably should not have worn it but I feel that that is the rebel coming out in him.I also agree about the smoking, that article was a load of bulls***.Smoking hasn't done Siobhan much good as without her sunglasses she looks dreadful.Also Kiefer is not an alcoholic,he is a binge drinker.There is a massive difference.My father was an alcoholic and alcoholics cannot have a normal life.Kiefer would not be able to do what he does, working, travelling etc if he was an alcoholic believe me.I'm not saying he doesn't have some kind of problem but he most certainly is not an alcoholic.I suspect his problem is more learnt than anything else.What did Shannon see?Can anyone tell me?there is so much on here I cannot find her post but it sounds as though she got to see exactly how they are together.I think I would be able to tell more if I saw them in the flesh but from a photograph I agree that it looks very staged and when they left Pastis together that was definitely pre-arranged! I must admit and I feel awful saying this but she really is a woman who I cannot warm to.I get very bad vibes from the photos I have seen and I have a very good instinct about these things.I can understand completely why everyone feels the way they do.Has any "dirt" been dished on her yet?I feel Kiefer has become abit of a victim of his own success here,everyone Siobhan,the PR people, FOX, all have ulterior motives.I wonder how he really feels?I have always felt that he has ait of a tortured soul tbh, he never seems to be completely happy.I would really love to see him settled down with a nice woman and put his boozing and womanising behind him.
Thanks Everyone, Edika
the PR guys, FOX all have an ulterior motive in the harsh light of day its because they are all there to make money.I'm sorry, but lets not kid ourselves that is anything else.As for Siobhan I would like to know more about her but from what I see I think that that she is in it for the fame and I'm very curious to know how an ex-model got her position.I'm also curious to know why they have chosen her for this little campaign, I suspect that it because she was in the right place at the right time and he knew her.Without getting too personal I believe they have been sleeping together at some point and someone has suggested that they use her "be seen out with Siobhan, like you are settling down and putting your wild days behind you" that sort of thing.Who is this woman?Is she well known in the US?Does she do charity work and is known to be a "good" person?I doubt it looking at her, thats why I think she was a case of she was there and has been useful but now I believe he wants rid of her.Women like Siobhan are ten a penny and I have met lots of them unfortunately.This is a PR campaign gone wrong and I cetainly wouldn't have embarked on it.
Thanks everyone, Edika
PS, I also believe the above were arranged too.If it was sincere,they would not have sat outside the way that they did.Most people would have felt uncomfortable having photographs taken like that and a video.If they wanted privacy and were in love then they would have gone somewhere private.She always has her sunglasses on and dressed up when the photos are arranged.Shoes like that at lunchtime is ridiculous when you are walking around,she must have been in agony with that bunion.
I could be wrong, but thats my thoughts on this.
Edika
I'm sure Kiefer is pleased you have all explained everything for him, he must have been very confused these past few months wondering exactly what was going on in his life. Wonder no more Kiefer, it has been decided it's all a PR campaign !
I was thinking the same thing, 6:43. Bet he's glad to have that cleared up, huh? :-)
Hi Linda: The first time I saw a close-up of this ring I thought it was (obviously, to me) a family/club type ring of some kind, and an old one at that. So, maybe journalists who saw it assumed the same thing and didn't think anything about it. It also seems to have an emblem of some kind in the middle of the stone? So, that makes it an odd choice for a relationship ring, but, of course, who knows for sure.
You’re correct .. if it did turn out to be a relationship statement of some kind, it might be slightly misleading. He said rather definitively that he's single and basically that he's in no hurry to change that (and that, at his age, he’d rather enjoy the good times, which I didn’t understand and would love to have you interpret for me, cuz it seemed really strange!!!), so a commitment ring wouldn't necessarily contradict his statement, but still ...
You know, I'd buy the argument that he's just playing down the relationship to protect Siobhan, except that she doesn't seem the least bit intimidated by the media. In fact, she seems to appreciate the attention, and it's good for her career. So, I don't know what there is to protect her from. Another suggestion is that he is somehow jealous of her for stealing some of his limelight, which doesn't make sense because she didn't ever appear to be eclipsing him in any way, and I don't think he'd be so shallow as to get jealous about something like that. If he's pulling back to protect his own privacy after the engagement rumours, then it doesn't make sense for him (or her) to wear rings that might turn up the volume on those rumours again. So, I don't know what he's thinking in wearing a ring, other than, as I've speculated above, he's sending a message that the rings, both of them, don't have any special significance to him. Of course they do to us, but we’re exceptionally interested fans (at least I know that I am, LOL). But, as always, I could be entirely wrong. I admit that I'm confused by all of this ring business. I think it's all a bit juvenile, to be honest. But, maybe I'm just really tired and cranky at the moment. LOL
As to Deb and Shannon’s thoughts about Malibu being partly about PR ... ABSOLUTELY. No question that they mixed business with pleasure in spending time in Malibu. He was pictured there on Wednesday as Mirrors promotion was starting up (when, as Shannon pointed out, paps aren’t normally around), and then over time he was with a boy, and a pal, and with his dog. Lots of gorgeous pics of him alone that, along with positive blurbs about 24 that sounded remarkably similar in tone, were published extensively at the end of August and early September ... when the new fall television schedule was gearing up. Not a coincidence. But that doesn't imply anything against Siobhan and why she was there, or that he might have been spending “quality time” with her, it's just a fact that at least one reason for being there was PR.
Suzanne
Linda at 7:42...The interview in question about Kiefer being "single" came from a source at LE Matin in San Diego on Sept 16. I believe a French interview, I can't read french myself but someone translated (2266 website)that article or interview for BB site. Things sometimes do get lost in translations.
But even so, the ring just means he is "off the Market". This doesn't mean he is engaged or married. If you look at Kiefers interviews and other things about him and Siob and what his rep's have said about them not being engaged, no one has lied nor were they misleading anyone. Siob could have given Kiefer this ring after all of this occurred.
And what I said at 3:54 on the 9th still holds true in "my opinion". I have No opinion about Siob because I don't know her on a personal level and even though I don't know Kiefer on a personal level either only by the interviews & what I have read and seen, I feel Kiefer wouldn't have wore the ring on that hand. I just would like to see him happy, even if the ring came from another source: man or woman
Suzanne, that statement was "interesting" to say the least but I think coming from Kiefer and given how his two marriages ended pretty quickly maybe he is saying that he is enjoying his single life as it is at least for the time being and that may or may not include Siobhan or other women and that while he is not married he plans to enjoy all of the moments, LOL.
As for the ring, it is also head scratching to me. The 8:00 poster could be correct that he is wearing it as an "off the market" statement (but that seems an odd choice of a ring to do so, IMHO) but maybe in the absence of an engagement to Siobhan he wears a ring making that statement to meet her halfway. Or he is wearing it cause it has special meaning in his family as Kiefer is very proud of his heritage, etc. (remember, he has all sorts of tatoos based on the same thing and given his seemingly new outlook on life this may have that kind of significance to him), and lastly, maybe his ring finger on that hand is the only one it fits comfortably on, that is also quite possible. I am sure that Kiefer being the media saavy person that he is would be well aware of the meaning of wearing a ring on that finger so maybe by doing so he is trying to throw cold water on all the ring wearing stuff sort of to ennoculate(sp) Siobhan wearing a ring out of turn and creating "buzz" if you will (Suzanne, this sounds like where you are at). That seems more logical to me than an "off the market" statement but who knows for sure and 8:00 poster I don't mean to discount your opinion, that is not my intention here.
Suzanne, one thing just to go back to the "coming out" party if you will at Pastis, did you ever give any thought to it being done on April Fool's Day. Kiefer has sorta of funny sense of humor and I think like you do that he gives off things in his interviews and actions; is it possible from a PR perspective here that he was making a statement or does it just seem like coincidence.
Just one other thought from a PR thinking perspective is that from April through the end of June we saw endless pics of the two of them. Since the engagement denial we have seen hardly any and all we really get are these blurbs in Hello and other mags about how their relationship is going strong but they are keeping it under wraps, etc.
Maybe the relationship is going strong and Kiefer has decided he no longer wants to document it as Fox may have liked previously but they still leak out these little tidbits from time to time; does that sound likely to you. I have initially thought that Siobhan was the one doing those leaks but after reading your analysis I am starting to think not her but Fox. LOL, maybe that is where they meet Kiefer halfway.
Btw, 8:00 I am with you I would just like to see Kiefer happy in whatever form that may take for him. However, if what Suzanne has outlined is accurate then I can't believe it would have made him a very happy soul and while I agree that he would not look favorably on Fox or anyone running his life, I do believe he would do almost anything especially on getting out of jail to please his bosses even if that meant going along with a "feel good" campaign against his will....
Hey Linda, I have a hard time believing their relationship is still going strong. I don't care how much someone wants to keep something under the radar, there would surely be moments when even just a look or touch would happen inadvertently. I have a difficult time believing that their love for one another would not come out once in awhile. That would be hard to hide, IMO.
Just to add to my post, I do think they are still involved somewhat. I just don't think things are as serious as they were earlier.
Kiefer can wear any kind of ring he wants, whether its a signet ring, heritage ring, something his daughter picked out for him, a old ring or to big one. The fact remains the same, he has 2 hands and its on the left one. It states he is in a relationship with someone but with whom? Siob or Rocco?
From the great advice and outlook the 2 Professional PR's, Suzanne and Edika were giving us, it would seem, Kiefer wouldn't be wearing a ring given to him from Siob. Since they believe it was all stages by Fox etc. I don't believe Kiefer would go that "far" and wear a ring from her.
They have only convinced me more,that my theory about Kiefer and Rocco could be true. That Kiefer set the stage to draw the attention away from him & Rocco.
Siob and Kiefer are just friends.
1/2 & 1/2
10:23, True, that could be another reason to steer folks away. Throw out a smokescreen....look, he wears tatoos for guys he is close to; why not a ring?
Possible! Just want him to be happy with who he is....his fans will love him no matter just as I do.
I never heard of a promise-“off-the-market” ring before for a man, but I could support that, but for Sib’s changing rings so much. Ok, in June, she wears her own gold ring but now she wears it on her ring finger, and an engagement-type of ring (light metal with sapphire, iirc) on her other finger. Wearing your own ring as a promise-type of ring seemed kinda strange to me, at that time. Maybe the other ring was the promise, but then why put it on the wrong finger. Then in June she had no rings. She was on the beach, but she would still put it on, if it had so much meaning for her, I think. In some pics she was dressed and on the deck, so she would have put it on then, at least, but maybe that’s the way I think and that would be wrong.
Then at the Exhibit she had another engagement-type of ring on (much like the one from June, but not the same ring, imo). Then on Saturday she went back to a gold ring, again on her ring finger, but this time it was a simple gold band, not her own gold ring. I thought they got married between thursday and saturday (tbh, I thought she was preganant at the Exhibit, so that’s why they quickly wed), but then his people said he was “definitely” not engaged, and she was smoking a cigarette, also, so not pregnant.
Then I thought that maybe his reps said he was “definitely not engaged” because he was already married!! But why would they play dumb that way; shouldn’t they say “no, he’s not engaged, he’s in reality married.”?
Ok, so then he shows up wearing a ring, also, but a couple of weeks after, and when he’s back at his home in LA, not in NY. To me, I agree that it looks not so much as a wedding-promise-“off the market” type of ring, but more as a family or class ring, or maybe simply a lovely jewelry piece.
HERE’S MY QUESTION: It’s the changing of the rings that makes me guess about this. If she’d put on one new ring, and had it on from then to now, I’d think they were promised, but that’s not what happened. Does anybody else think it’s strange for her to change her rings up so many times? If it’s just me, you can tell me so, my feelings won’t hurt because of it. LOL I’d really like to know.
I’m Claudia
LOL, Claudia.
Seems to me she is playing games with the rings and that is why I think Suzanne is on target that Kiefer could very well have placed that ring on his finger (notice how he seemed to not mind it being displayed) on purpose to show that a ring is a ring and take away the "buzz" factor from her.
It's the same feeling I get when he does these official engagement denials. It's almost in her face in a way. I mean how many times does he have to deny being engaged to her?
That's what I don't understand about him even being with her at all cause at this point I just see a man that is getting more grief from her than necessary. Unless, of course, Suzanne's theory of a PR nature is right on which I don't doubt and it's making the Fox people happy and also I bet at this point he has to tread lightly with her.
Just my viewpoint but again I don't see a man in love with this woman. I don't think people who are in love play these silly games. In fact, I have an easier time believing the Kiefer and Rocco theory at this point. At least Kiefer looks (or maybe I should say looked as we haven't seen them together publicly since March) like he is happy around Rocco even if they are just friends. He doesn't look happy with her, IMHO.
If Kiefer is married, what a funny wedding ring he wears ?!! LOL
I don't know why he would hide this from his public.
12:59, LOL, that is the one thing I feel sure of and that is he is not married!!
No reason at all to deny or hide that, IMHO...
I have to tell you all, I don't even get this whole ring fiasco. I had no idea there could be this much commotion about wearing a ring on your left hand, LOL. I do agree with you Claudia ...if there was a promise ring of sorts, I would guess that would be the one she would wear; not several different ones. And if he was going to wear one, yes you would think he would do that when he was with her.
And I absolutely agree they do not look like a couple in love.
maybe he is just attracted by her. After all, she's a good looking woman but i would not trust her, her divorce was too fast.
Hey Lysette, I think in the world of celebrity it raises red flags to all of us watchers whenever someone has a ring on that finger. It's the same effect when any actress either gains some tummy weight or wears a billowy blouse the pregnancy rumors abound, LOL!!
But I even think in the real world if someone suddenly shows up with a ring on that finger especially a certain type people ask the question. Happens in my office all the time. Such nosey people we are, LOL!!
For me all Kiefer is doing is wearing a ring. Hes not playing guessing games with his fans..that something we have started here. Until Kiefer comes out and says he is or is planning to get engaged(which to date he has denied) then he is a single man who is only dating. No big deal.
Claudia...by what you are saying... Kiefer is also playing games on purpose. Do you really believe he would do this to his fans?
I think we all agree he is NOT engaged or married. We all know this! We have all said, it. But it could be just a "off the market" ring meaning a promise to stay true to just one person or a old fashion going steady ring.
Kiefer wore the RING on his left hand for a "reason", his a smart guy. The question is, WHO gave him the ring?
Almost everyone deleted Siob. Two things remain...him playing games or Rocco?
1/2 & 1/2
5:27, I definitely don't think Kiefer is playing games. I don't think he would do that to his fans. I agree with you that he wore it for a specific reason whatever that is. I do see what Suzanne outlined as a real possibility.
I am guessing you are convinced it is a "promise" ring or something. Guess it could be. I don't know that we have completely eliminated Siobhan but it just doesn't seem likely given all the engagement denials.
You do make me laugh though with your 1/2 & 1/2. I guess that's appropriate since we really don't know anything for sure unless Kiefer tells us which I don't think he will, LOL...Is there one you are leaning more towards, LOL!!
Hi Linda: I also wondered about April 1. It does sound like Kiefer's brand of humor, but it could also just be sheer coincidence. Also, about Kiefer taking the visual component of their relationship down a notch, but allowing tabloid stories ... I don't think Siobhan is actually getting that much coverage since the June denial. I just googled her and there's only one story in the last month, which is a story about Kiefer which includes a reference to him dismissing rumors that he's about to tie the knot. The only other story I can recall is the ET Canada denial when she wore the ring Sept. 13, so, at least the ring thing is generating some buzz.
And Claudia, I too have a hard time reconciling all the rings that Siobhan's been wearing, and whether they are two different gold rings, and two different sapphire rings, but I wish she'd stop it because I'm getting tired. LOL
And, finally, to Edika, I also think the June luncheon was a photo-op. No doubt about it.
OH...BTW, The Signet Ring everyone is talking about, Kiefer wore it, in the movie "The Cowboy Way" and John English was the Horse Trainer...1994
You can check it out at Kiefer Sutherland IMDb website. Stunts; John English.
5:53 I'm not sure yet!
1/2 & 1/2
Suzanne and Edika, I agree with both of you on the June luncheon being a photo-op. Kiefer had literally stepped off the plane from South Africa and they were followed from his apartment for blocks then ate at an outdoor cafe. Seems like they were almost waiting and expecting the paps and then did nothing to escape them. Here is where I get confused cause she had that ring on display forcing Kiefer's PR people to issue the 1st denial. Btw, don't know if this was mentioned before but that ring appeared to be the same ring she wore earlier and was pictured in during the Griffith Parks photos. In those shots it was on her right hand ring finger.
I think you are right Suzanne as it looked like in this luncheon instance they were reminding people they were a couple....
I really dont think Kiefer would give a hoot about his fans knowing who he is with..I dont think hes going to go to all the trouble to set up a photo luncheon just so fans can see who he is with..shes not that important . . and what about other women hes been seen having lunch with in the past? .. . .are they all photo opportunities too?
I agree that his PR thing is getting out of hand.
Theres no proof of that..cant the guy have lunch outside with a female companion without people thinking the whole thing was setup?
LOL Linda, I know, it's confusing. I think you're right; in fact I think it was the ring she wore all along, starting August 07, on her right hand, and through April and May. Dazia was kind enough to show a blown up version from June and I remember thinking it was the same ring. So why suddenly switch it at a photo-op?
At first I tended to believe that she switched the ring on her own at that photo-op, without his knowledge or consent. Most men wouldn't notice a ring being switched from one hand to the other. The fact that his reps denied the engagement so quickly, and then he was seen with Darla, and Siobhan wasn't seen again for more than a month, made me more certain that she acted on her own and he got angry.
But, with these other ring(s) ... as I've said, I just don't know anymore. The possibilities are that he doesn't care what she wears on her fingers, or that she doesn't care if he objects, or that he wants her to wear it. I doubt he would really want her to wear a ring that forces denials to be issued (even if it generated publicity, at least not after the first time), so .. that leaves the possibility that he doesn't care, or that she doesn't care if he cares. Either is possible, I suppose, but I don't claim to know.
Whoops! that should have been 'this PR thing' not 'his'
On Dazia's site she has just posted some random pics. In one of them he is wearing a ring on his left hand. It looks like it was taken around the time of The Three Musketeers. It only strengthens my belief that he just randomly wears a ring on his left hand. Nothing more.
Yes, that's the signet ring, which he's worn off and on for years and always on that finger. For anyone who's looked at Kiefer photos taken through the years, there's never been any doubt that, while the recent ring isn't one that he's ever been photographed wearing before, he has worn a ring (the signet ring) on that finger - and only on that finger - in the past.
I'm angry and jealous (LOL) because my boyfriend have seen Siobhan'pics and he told me "wow, she is very beautiful!".
Is there a man here who can give his opinion about this woman ? i'm curious... Of course i know she's not ugly.
8:02, I don't think any of us believe that IF there is a PR campaign it's about his fanbase. Although I disagree with you in that I DO believe Kiefer cares about what his true fans think, maybe Suzanne can comment to this fact as well. To me it's really about his overall image which is reflective of his association with the studio and how it may affect advertisers, etc. Remember, unlike in the past, we are dealing with the issue of drunk driving. We don't know for sure what kind of push back the studio got from various groups, etc. I don't think you can discount a PR campaign for this reason. For a studio paying its' top star big bucks, image is everything. This is a business and a big business at that and Kiefer knows the business. He's been in it for over 20 years. His future is at stake here whether people want to see that or not.
I personally believe the studio was sensitive and angry about what happened with Kiefer and he has been determined to turn that viewpoint around.
I also believe that Siobhan was someone he probably started a relationship with at least at the start but it is clear to me that the studio and/or Kiefer more likely the studio thought it wise to use it to their advantage. There is no way in my mind and you are even confirming that in a way in your point that Kiefer would have advertised this relationship by coming out of Pastis in broad daylight like he did if there wasn't something more to it. Btw, that was followed up by another high profile dinner at Waverly Inn.
And no, I certainly don't believe the other women were publicity stunts but there was never a reason for this type of thing before.
I think the two ladies from the PR field have certainly outlined why a PR campaign may be necessary in this instance and how that has been reflected in all of the behavior of all parties, IMHO.
Btw, just to add to my post above, IF they were going to have a rebuilding image campaign for Kiefer which would involve a stable relationship as part of the deal then a woman like Siobhan would make a perfect candidate, just saying.
Suzanne, I am wondering if you agree here.
and yes, 12:28, I personally think she is attractive. She was a Chanel Model and my understanding is that is pretty top of the line in the modeling industry.
According to me, Kiefer is not using his girlfriend to prove he has changed, simply because he was with her before his arrest. They can walk or eat in a restaurant as "normal" people !
And on malibu pics, on the terrace, even if they were not kissing, we see PDA. When they were in Pastis there's a pic on which they look at each other and they laugh, i told myself : Kiefer is in love and it's serious. Now, i can tell i was not wrong, he's still with her. He lives more in NY and less in LA.
what is surprising is that suddenly his divorce was finalized in May...Knowing she had just divorced too, perhaps he wanted to show her he could do this too.
Just my opinion i know people will not agree with me but i don't think they are just friends or Kiefer doesn't care about her.
In my opinion at Dazia site... she has a blown up pics of Kiefer & Siob at the Michael Thompson Exhibition on Sept. 11 and the ring she is wearing on her left hand looks like the same color blue as Kiefer's.
The Three Musketeers was done in 1993...
The Cowboy Way was done in 1994 when John English was on the set. He has wore the ring off and on since then. I haven't seen him wear it in along time.
I didn't know Rocco attended the Walk of Fame in Canada with Kiefer in June 05. No girlfriend at the time I guess. You would think he would have wore an "heritage" or some kind of "signet" ring to his Home Country Event, he loves Canada. Strange!
Just my opinion 1/2 & 1/2.
1:26, I think we are in agreement somewhat here. I think Kiefer was definitely seeing Siobhan prior to jail and this was a budding relationship.
That's why this was a perfect opportunity to use it for everyone's advantage. As Suzanne stated, it doesn't mean Kiefer went along with Fox happily but saw it as a necessary evil if you will.
I certainly don't think, PR campaign or not, that he pulled Siobhan out of the sky to use her for this sole purpose.
2:03, did Rocco attend that event?
3:05 Why would Rocco be jealous of all of Kiefer's girl/friends when Rocco knows Kiefer willn't be intimate with them if he is gay?
I'm not judging Siob character,she might be a very nice person but he is not very intimate with her either, just like the other woman he has been with except Catherine. I hope he isn't using her for a cover like his wife and many more. I'm curious about him like everyone else and even though I might think he is gay. I still like Kiefer alot. I want him to do the right thing NOT for Fox, his fans but for himself or he will never, ever be happy, whether he is with a man or a woman. I don't care if I ever find out as long as he is true to himself. He will be happier and maybe stop drinking.
In "my opinion" he needs a cover up like he had with Kelly. Whether people like her or not, she shouldn't be used either,if this is the case.
If Kiefer marry's her, I guess I will still go on having my suspisions because I see what everyone else is seeing...no affection. He showed more with Catherine in public(photo's) & Rocco.
I had 2 yrs to think about this, when maybe you are just starting, in the end you will find, you just can't stop liking Kiefer, as I do.
1/2 & 1/2?
This place is the best entertainment on the web. I never knew that fevered speculation could be so many laughs. The "PR people" are a funny new addition. Right. Before you bother to tell me you have a right to speculate,don't bother. I know you do. I just think it's hilarious to read.
I've never heard rumors about Kiefer being gay before reading this... Is it a way to justify the lack of PDA with Siobhan or you're jealous about this relationship and tries to tell everyone he doesn't care at all 'cause he likes men. Kiefer treats Rocco as a child, i don't see love but friendship. It has been twenty years since he's actor and if he had been with one or several men i think we would have heard whispers.
Look at Keanu Reeves or the actor of Prison Breack, there are serious rumors about homosexuality and i don't think they are fake even if keanu has been linked with women.
I have read and heard rumors about Kiefer being gay. Just like Keanu and Miller on Prison Break. Kiefer and Keanu are old friends which doesn't prove anything of course. And Kiefer doesn't by any means treat Rocco like a child. He also got his tatoo, when he was on tour with Rocco before the CD ever came out. They have lived at his Studio together. I have to say, alot can be said about those two. Traveling around together for 5 yrs. The money Kiefer put out for this guy. The Studio made a great love nest for both of them. What a great cover up! He could be Bisexual.
Its a better story then hearing about the pics, the pics, the pics of Siob from 2 PR's. Who in my opinion trashed her.
I have to give credit to 1/2&1/2 for sticking to her story. There is nothing wrong with wondering if a Star is gay. Its human nature. Everyone does it when they see or hear something thats not normal.
Kiefer sure does confuse me with NO PDA with this woman and others. I'm almost convinced myself about whether he could be bisexual. The signs are all there.
OF COURSE, just speculating like EVERYONE else......
i didn't know they have lived at his studio together. How do you know that ?
What about Siobhan ... i'm sure she lives with him, are you sure she would stay with a man who shows no affection to her ?
I'm sure she would stay with a man who shows no affection to her - if she's offered enough money....
WHAT!...THE BIG PARTYING/DRINKING BAD BOY OF HOLLYWOOD FOR THE PASS 20 YEARS DOES NOT TELL ANY LITTLE WHITE LIES OR BIG ONES, TURNING INTO A SAINT AND FOX IS MAKING HIM DO THIS, AFTER WORKING FOR THEM FOR 20 YEARS.
WHAT IS THIS, "THE BRADY BUNCH"?
WHO IS WRITING THIS BULL!
I'm alittle confused as to why everyone is still assuming that they are together when he has said that he is single?Maybe they are just friends who occasionally sleep together,it does happen.
I'm alittle confused as to why everyone is still assuming that they are together when he has said that he is single?Maybe they are just friends who occasionally sleep together,it does happen.
Hey 6:07 are you awake yet? Rocco is in the studio recording for 24 with Kiefer. Do you really think she would be there? He likes long distance relationships. No woman ever lived with him full time, he has always had two homes. Right now he is keeping a low profile ever since Jay Leno seen ITYTKM.
I'm really surprise no one heard or read the stuff about Kiefer kissing a guy in a bar, hanging out in gay bars, doing a lap dance on a guys leg. Where he hangs out in NYC and lives is one of the biggest gay communities in the States.
While the MOUSE is away the CAT will play. She's a cover up since Kiefer's ex-wife Kelly wanted out.
Guess we can see where ALL the confusion comes from with the pics. The Brady Bunch! Right on!
Despite the fact that he loves acting he is also in it to make a living and I don't think we can forget this.Despite what he will/won't do for the studio well one person we are forgetting is how Sarah must feel when she hears via the press her Dad is getting married even though it isn't true.People have talked about the studio and Siobhan blah blah but a quick denial will be for a few reasons.Maybe he helped Rocco because he thinks Rocco should have the chances he not always had.I agree he looks at Rocco like family.And he has no wife and grown up kids so it makes sense he puts his money some place he believes in.Like everyone else here, I'm a fan and I think he is a very talented man but when he has the world at his feet, has had several beautiful women who love him sitting around on benches and has millions in the bank, I kinda find it hard to feel sorry for him. Who knows why he self-destructs? Maybe because he has not found the right lady or man if that is the case?I'm not sure what motivates Siobhan,or even whether or not they are together?but maybe this is all wearing thin because I doubt she will last and we have wasted all this time discussing her.If he was in love he would be showing the world, you cannot hide that kinda emotion.He seems to have her like a puppet on a string,he gets close then backs away when it gets too much.If she genuinely likes him then I think she going to end up with a broken heart but like everybody here, I'm only speculating.
Despite the fact that he loves acting he is also in it to make a living and I don't think we can forget this.Despite what he will/won't do for the studio well one person we are forgetting is how Sarah must feel when she hears via the press her Dad is getting married even though it isn't true.People have talked about the studio and Siobhan blah blah but a quick denial will be for a few reasons.Maybe he helped Rocco because he thinks Rocco should have the chances he not always had.I agree he looks at Rocco like family.And he has no wife and grown up kids so it makes sense he puts his money some place he believes in.Like everyone else here, I'm a fan and I think he is a very talented man but when he has the world at his feet, has had several beautiful women who love him sitting around on benches and has millions in the bank, I kinda find it hard to feel sorry for him. Who knows why he self-destructs? Maybe because he has not found the right lady or man if that is the case?I'm not sure what motivates Siobhan,or even whether or not they are together?but maybe this is all wearing thin because I doubt she will last and we have wasted all this time discussing her.If he was in love he would be showing the world, you cannot hide that kinda emotion.He seems to have her like a puppet on a string,he gets close then backs away when it gets too much.If she genuinely likes him then I think she going to end up with a broken heart but like everybody here, I'm only speculating.
Can somebody please tell me what happened on Leno about ITYTKM?
Thanks.
Is he going to marry her just to cover up the gay rumors? Makes more sense then the jail time stuff which I thought was a bunch of bull too.
Kiefer has always been the BAD BOY of Hollywood. Why would jail time make a differences, we all expected it to happen sooner or later with his wild ways? He said it wouldn't stop him from having fun and is enjoying himself being single. In my opinion he is doing it more behind close doors, just like his other activities. Rocco maybe? Possible.
Helping someone get started in the music world is wonderful, we all can agree to this.
But after the tour 05. Jude Cole took over as Rocco's manager. Kiefer still followed Rocco all over the globe and did 24. The ITYTKM Tour was in Dec 05 to kick off Rocco career but yet Kiefer and Rocco went together to Iceland in 04 in Dec, the other members of the band weren't there. They said Kiefer find a girlfriend there but now I know that was a bunch of bull. Rocco even played at places without the band but Kiefer was with him. Alot of isolated spots where fans wouldn't go. I followed Rocco's career. When Kiefer caught on to the fans getting all the places on the internet where Rocco would be, he started to just post a few at a time.
Kiefer got that tatoo because he did not care if anyone find out about him. Of course I believe Kiefer was just in the "moment" and realize what he did when he got back. Kiefer always does things when he is in the "moment" just like drinking. Thinks about things after its done or too late.
They went to Iceland when Kiefer was off from 24 during the vacation holidays. Why didn't he spend the time with his family? Why didn't he put all that time into a relationship with a girlfriend or his wife like someone else said? Good question? Things are starting to add up here with Kiefer and Rocco.
Folks - calm down! I know them both personally - Kiefer and Rocco - and they are NOT gay - not the slightest bit!
Thanks everyone for adding more info because I was starting to feel like a lonely duck in a pond.
After the DVD ITYTKM came out in 06 the rating for 24 went down. I wonder if Fox was upset over this. Jay Leno and all the stuff about Kiefer being gay started after the DVD came out. I believe this is when my suspisions became even greater. Especially when JL made a wise remark about it. Fox might have covered up some other things, that we didn't hear.
The cover up...Jail time like the PR's were talking about or Being Gay? Maybe kill 2 birds with one stone? Interesting!
1/2 & 1/2
8:47, you know Kiefer so if you do, you can tell us more about Kiefer and Siobhan.
Oh, for heaven's sake, 1/2 & 1/2, you're being utterly ridiculous.
Whatever Kiefer's sexuality is or isn't, none of your "reasons" for believing that he's gay make any sense. You've said a lot of silly stuff on this subject, but saying that "the ratings for 24 went down because of ITYTKM" takes the cake. Do you know how few people actually *saw* ITYTKM? Try "hardly any." The Jay Leno think you're yapping about was nothing! It was a momentary joke and I've never read/heard/seen anyone bring it up as a "hint" about Kiefer's sexuality except you.
Frankly, all the supposed PR-professional stuff that's been posted in the last little bit here smells fishy to me. I think that Suzanne and Edika sound a little over-invested in finding ways to discredit Siobhan and/or whatever relationship Kiefer and Siobhan do or don't have with one another to be credible as objective industry voices.
Everything the two of them and others here focus on in terms of FOX's insistence on Kiefer publicly being in a relationship to rehabilitate his image is based on the, imo, major fallacy that he had a major publicity problem as a result of his DUI/jail time. His publicity people, very likely in concert with FOX, and he himself handled the entire situation so well that... he doesn't. Plus, the public at large just doesn't care about Kiefer - his comings and goings, his ring, Siobhan's rings, his relationship status, he himself - as much as the relative handful of fans do. PR professionals would, imo/experience, know that.
I do think that there was a time that he and Rocco were spending enough time together that it may have become whisper-worthy in the industry, but I think that time has long since passed too... for whatever reason(s).
8:47 Yea, right! Going to give us more PR Bull. If you knew them, you would have cleaned up the rumors about Siob and Rocco along time ago. Another sob story about The Saint Kiefer.
Why didn't you say that when all the photo stuff was going on with the...PR's "Folks...calm down".
Are we that close to a "Cover UP"? Is this just to derail everyone again back to the pics? You mention the pics again and I will know you are a BUNCH of BULL.
That last post was me.
... and just want to add that it's not that I don't understand that publicity plays a big part in celebrity's lives and that sometimes they have to play along with things that aren't totally for real as part of that. I think that, like most celebrities, there have been times in Kiefer's life when he's done that and I do think that "his people" tipped the first sightings with Siobhan.
I just don't think that it's necessarily clear why they tipped that or that everything about their relationship, whatever it ever was or is now, was nothing but publicity (and I know that not everyone here is saying that).
I just think that personal distaste for Siobhan (for whatever reasons) is, for some, fueling a rather amazing need to deconstruct every.single.detail of their interactions to a pretty amazingly intense and, imo, rather over-the-top degree.
And that's coming from someone who's fascinated by Kiefer too!
Just my opinion.
Oops, another post came between this one and my last one. I'm the post before 9:25.
Oh - and speaking of 9:25... how is someone saying "neither Kiefer or Rocco is gay" a "sob story about The Saint Kiefer."
Someone's a homophobe. Nice.
I don't believe 1/2 & 1/2 put anything out there that was utterly irrational. As a matter of fact there was alot to believe and facts. Everyone has a right to be here to speculate just like you Christy. You said yourself you don't know what sexual partner Kiefer likes.
The industry knows things before the fans and Jay Leno belongs to that industry. Whatever his wise remark was about Kiefer being gay, the fans did pick up on it. Jay Leno has alot more fan base then Kiefer, as you said. He carries alot of weight in the industry. Kiefer is just a small fry completed to him. Kiefer can use all the fans he can get.
Everything is fishy to you, especially if someone is discrediting Siob and things about her don't go your way. Sorry, very few people like her and believe she is fishy, that's her problem. You don't need to take it out on someone who has not discredited her character like so many have.
Maybe 1/2 & 1/2 is on the right track after all. She has been on this site for awhile and Christy is just now seeing it, taking notice that people are now responsing to 1/2 & 1/2. Not going poor Christy way & protesting to much.
9:32
The Sob Story just meant them, probably Christy trying to cover things up. Its fine with me if Kiefer is gay. It doesn't change who a person is but sad to cover it up. Disappointed if Kiefer is gay and keeps playing this game. Using women! Are you Christy anonymous??
10:20
I'm in agreement with you. I thought the 2 PR's were strange coming on and then someone saying they knew Kiefer and Rocco. Sound like something Christy would do to bring the focus back on the pics and Siob again. Fishy! And now she is calling them Fishy.
She is discrediting 1/2 & 1/2 to stir the focus back into her direction. Christy probably goes but 20 different names on this site. It seemd she will do anything to get everyone to talk about Siob & the pics. Christy are you playing at being 2 PR's and someone who knows Kiefer and Rocco? He wouldn't give you the time of day. Just a FAKE!
CHRISTY IS 20 DIFFERNT PEOPLE ON THIS SITE...A FAKE
CHRISTY IS 20 DIFFERENT PEOPLE ON THIS SITE...A FAKE
CHRISTY IS 20 DIFFERENT PEOPLE ON THE SITE...A FAKE
CHRISTY IS 20 DIFFERENT PEOPLE ON THE SITE...A FAKE
CHRISTY IS 20 DIFFERENT PEOPLE ON THIS SITE...A FAKE
AND THE BEAT GOES ON...I AGREE
AND THE BEAT GOES ON & ON......................................................................................................................................................................................................
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
.......................................
Oh Christy... you've got an over-the-top need to protect Kiefer from criticism!!! Let me ask you this --- what about these rings? Don't you think it's awfully strange that she started wearing rings on "that" finger at the time that engagement rumours were flying? Rumours die down and then Kiefer wears a ring? Just for the hell of it? Just coincidence? I for one don't believe in coincidence. What about you? Hey, I want "just your opinion" on this.
Hee! Talk about over-reaction.
First, nope, I'm not 20 different people on this site. I'm just me.
Second, when did I ever say that people don't have a right to speculate? Of course, they do. And I have a right to say what I think too.
Third, where are you getting that I'm "protecting Kiefer from criticism?" What criticism, specifically, are you referring to?
Fourth, I don't know what Kiefer's newly-unveiled ring is, what it may or may not mean, or why he wore it. Your belief that the entire world is an uproar about Siobhan's and Kiefer's rings is hysterically funny, though. (Lissa is right about this site being very entertaining.)
Anything else?
this is not christy, but I think there are a few people on this site who are rather strange !
8.47-If you really know Kiefer, then can you please tell us what the situation is with him and Siobhan.All we need is a simple yes/no about whether they are together or not.
Christy, every time I read one of your posts, I wonder why you come to this site. It's about giving opinions here, but you say that you (basically) don't have an opinion (i.e., you say "I don't know why this/or what that/or how something else ... I just wish him well"). Well, in my opinion, most of us wish him well. Then, in my opinion, you say that (basically) no one else should have an opinion, either, which you demonstrate by telling others that their opinion, when they ignore you and state their opinion anyway, is completely wrong/ridiculous/delusional/irrational etc. ... in your opinion.
Well, I'd just like to get your opinion on my opinion of your approach to stating opinions. And please don't give me that hehe-and-now-I'm-going-to-blow-you-off-with-my-superior-witt-and-wisdom approach that you seem to love so much, in my opinion. Please, opine thoughtfully on my opinion. Thanks
Oh, and btw, in my opinion, you're of the opinion that we're a bunch of sad, obsessed fans who dwell too much on the details of Kiefer's life, including, perhaps, his opinions (dunno for sure, that's just my opinion). And yet, no one posts more than you do, and no one seems to know more about the details of Kiefer's life than you do. Moreover, I'm of the opinion that you're of the opinion that you're somehow Kiefer's keeper/protector. In my opinion, that makes you the saddest and most delusional fan who comes here.
Think about it, and I look forward to your opinion.
That dressing down was well deserved. Are you playing at being the 2 PR's Christy? It was strange that you didn't say anything when they were trashing Siob. Then the 2 PR's didn't say anything about the gay stuff going on. If they were real Professional PR's they would have commented on it but no, they were doing what you like the most Christy and that was steering the talk back to the Siob pics. Have to say all of that was weird yesterday and other people commented on it.
You agree with Lissa?? Who always comes on when you need her to be nasty. How many faces do you have or names?
It was pretty nasty of you to call 1/2 & 1/2 utterly ridiculous. Like you have some kind of right to be nasty to people. At less we knew where she stood, even picked out a site to see the ring.
You nor anyone else know if Kiefer is gay. It was just speculation. Everyone is curious especially you, about all things Kiefer. I'm beginning to believe all the speculation about him being gay is true. If Jay Leno said something in fun or a joke, its to be taken serious. Show Host do it all the time.
Next time if you don't like someones comment or opinion please refrain from name calling. People will answer back with the same attitude.
4:36pm - I have lots of opinions about Kiefer, it's true! Ask me what I think about his drinking, his talent, how enormously fascinating he is. I've got opinions - lots of 'em - about all of those things... and more.
In fact, I have an opinion about his relationship with Siobhan too. That opinion is: whatever their relationship is, I genuinely don't think enough is known about them to form a strong idea of where they've been or where they're at. I think they've clearly spent time together. I don't think that all the body language that gets dissected here and elsewhere points to him being miserable around her. I don't think that the rings are a big deal one way or another... unless they are... in which case, they're clearly not saying publicly.
Others disagree with me and that's fine. I would never say that anyone shouldn't state their opinion. That doesn't mean that I'm not also going to say so if I think something is silly (and, believe me, I don't post about every single thing I see here that I think is silly). Just as you - and others - post to me (not mincing words) when you think something I say is wrong... annoying... whatever.
I've stated my opinion about their relationship - whatever it is - many times... here and elsewhere. I think you're confusing not liking my opinion or, more to the point, not liking the fact that I'm not desperate to find a reason why it's not a relationship with my not having an opinion. But that's okay; it's not the first time and I'm sure it won't be the last.
Christy...Your the one to over react when things don't go your way. You might have a right to say what you think Christy, give your dozen of opinions and spectulate all you wish but the nastiness and name calling was totally uncalled for.
The person who talked about Christy's opinions opinions and more opinions, you are right Christy basically doesn't have any opinions. She is never sure!
At least 1/2 & 1/2 was being persistent & honest in something she must believe in. Or somewhat believe in?
5:06pm - As I said above, I'm just me. I don't have other ids on this site. I'm not Lissa and I'm not the two people who claim to be PR professionals. I agree with you, though, that they seem to be awfully invested in dissecting every detail about Siobhan and her relationship with Kiefer so as to discredit her and the idea that there's any relationship, which kinda makes me doubt their PR credentials. In any case, they're definitely not me because I don't think I know enough about Siobhan to have an opinion about her (which means that I don't dislike her because I'm not going to dislike someone without a reason) and, if they're in a relationship, I just wish them well. I'm not at all invested in proving that they're not together.
I've also said, many times, that I have no idea what his sexuality is or isn't. Further, if he's gay, I don't care. At all.
I don't know that 1/2 & 1/2 is wrong overall, but I do know that the theory about 24's ratings falling (a very complicated question in and of itself) and ITYTKM is ridiculous. Almost NO ONE who watches 24 saw ITYTKM. The Jay Leno comment fit perfectly in the context of the moment and wasn't a "coded reference" to Kiefer's sexuality. Yes, such things exist. That moment wasn't one of them.
I have no idea what you mean about "at least we know where she stood." You know where I stand too. You just don't like it. Which is fine by me.
6:05pm - Yeah, imagining the nerve of not being rock solid sure about the motivations, actions and personal lives in general of people I don't actually know.
Of course, we're all interested and of course we all speculate but, imo, there's a difference between speculating and making definitive statements about people's motivations and actions... based on what's not, imo, very much information re: this relationship... or this whatever it is.
Christy, why would you say "almost NO ONE who watches 24 saw ITYTKM". How would we know that?
Btw, I agree with you about the ratings between the two having nothing to do with one another.
I do think that the PR lady, Suzanne is accurate when she states that Fox may be more than abit worried as a result of Kiefer's DUI that it will affect viewership. We still don't know for sure what push back they got from MADD or any other organizations. Remember, MADD did demand that Ford remove him as a spokesperson so I believe it is reasonable to assume that Fox worried about advertising as related to Kiefer.
Hence, a more than strong possibility that there was/is a PR push to make him appear stable. Where and how much Siobhan fits into all of that is of course unknown but I think it does exist to some degree at least at the outset with all of those publicity shots...
Your a liar Christy! You were the one dissecting the photo of them and pretending to be the 2 PR's. I believe you were even pretending to be Linda.
You wanted everyone comments on the pics and ring. You get off on everyone talking about Siob whether its good or bad. You hate when people start talking about another subject. When they do, you steer them right back to the pics or Siob by using another name.
How funny was it when, everyone was talking about Kiefer being gay earlier and who Pumps In:
Anonymous at 8:47am...Folks-calm down! I know them both personally. Kiefer & Rocco- they are NOT gay- not the slightest bit.
This was Christy of course because everyone started asking this unknown person about Kiefer & Siob. Just like Christy intended, to derail everyone back to them again. You are a very Sad person and even worst a LIAR.
And to be very honest with you Christy I was watching for you all day yesterday. On purpose I was steering people away from the 2 Pr's to see what you would do. You fell right into my trap every time. Not everyone is gullible Christy, especially me.
Thanks to some people who believe in me because I'm still 1/2 & 1/2 about Kiefer. I wasn't playing with anyone else but Christy. I know when she is on. She will derail you.
Hi Peggy... and thanks for signing your name. :)
I say that about ITYTKM and 24 because almost no one saw ITYTKM, period so it follows logically that not very many of the millions of people who watch 24 saw it. That said, it's probably also true that a greater percentage of people who watch 24 saw it than of those who don't watch 24... but, one way or another, it's not a big percentage of the people who watch 24.
Yep, MADD did ask Ford-Canada to pull Kiefer off their ads... and Ford didn't do it. I'm sure they would in a heartbeat if he were to be arrested again or be extremely public about his drinking but, for now, they've shown faith in him. I'm sure that FOX has similar concerns and I wouldn't be a bit surprised if there's a very clear agreement between them and Kiefer about aspects of his public behavior. FOX has taken great care with 24 (i.e., not airing a partial post-strike s7 even though there was a lot of pressure in the industry for networks to do that) and investing in a shot-on-location (i.e., expensive) TV movie. They're promotion for both is largely Jack-centric. They're showing a lot of faith in him too. I'm sure that he has to keep up his end of that bargain, but I don't really see a lot of evidence that, beyond the obvious (don't get arrested, not too much public drunkenness), they're micromanaging his life.
I think that the initial couple of sightings with Siobhan probably were tipped - and probably by his people - but I don't think that it's clear that it was to present him as stable. It seems to me like they must've spent plenty of unphotographed time together since the spring (whether or not they are at this point or not, I don't know). It just doesn't seem clear to me - as I know it does to others - that it's all publicity... or that he doesn't enjoy her company.
My signature got cutoff, but that was me... :)
1/2 & 1/2, I am Linda and can definitely vouch for my comments on this board, LOL!!
I am one who thinks you do make a convincing argument although we just don't know for sure and I don't care if he is, btw, I just want him to be happy as I feel we all do. I mean he did spend alot of time with Rocco but, of course, he is very commited to his music and this was his first singer signed to the label. He was with Catherine for some of this time though, wasn't he and he also saw that Jennifer for like 3-4 months; I remember she even went on some of the tours with them. The thing is we have seen Kiefer with so many women at bars and stuff just not with one woman for an extended period of time which doesn't really confirm anything one way or another.
But don't you think if anything Suzanne, the PR lady helps your argument cause I think she does even though I am not sure she is arguing for your point or for the Siobhan point. I think, and I don't want to speak for her, that she is just making the argument that some of the pics we have seen of Kiefer appear to be manufactured....an observation I happen to agree with.
Oh my, 7:07pm, you really are delusional. I'm no one else on this board - not Linda, not Lissa, not the 2 PR people, not any anonymous. Just me.
By the way, you wouldn't happen to be "Lady_Sutherland", would you?
Gee Christy, you claim not to be able to form an opinion about Siobhan and Kiefer as a couple because you don't have enough information, but you (for all intents and purposes) called the two PR people liars about their credentials, without knowing anything about them (I'm guessing)!!! Hmmm ... interesting. I don't think that's quite fair, to be honest.
Hey Christy, I agree that I’m not entirely objective in my assessments of Kiefer, but I stand by the substance of what I’ve said for three reasons: because I’ve discussed this with other people in my line of work (who aren’t Kiefer fans), because I’ve thought about things before I’ve posted them (as any reasonable/responsible person would), and because, yes, I am a professional (and therefore I simply tweak to things from a certain perspective, rather automatically). Questioning the stated credentials of another person, without knowing anything to the contrary, isn’t a very “Kiefery” thing to do, just as, upon reflection, I must admit that my personal criticisms of Siobhan aren’t exactly “Kiefery,” either (I scrolled back, and I agree that I made a few less than objective statements about her, a woman I’ve never met, and I should not have done that).
I would also say that I don’t think that you or I can get into Kiefer’s head, or know the mind-set of his reps and/or Fox. Accordingly, neither of us can know with certainty how important his current perceived image considerations are to him/to them. So, you’ve made a leap of faith by accepting that it’s a “major fallacy” to assume that he needs a concerted PR campaign right now, which makes you as guilty as I and many other people for speaking rather definitively on matters about which
(cont'd) we have no first hand knowledge. Beyond that, according to you, the reason he doesn’t need a PR campaign is because he/his people handled the DUI situation so well ... which would mean that he’s already run a PR campaign. So, you’re certain that he’s run a successful campaign, and yet you’re slightly incensed at the idea that he may be running one now, and apparently you’re incensed because it might include Siobhan. That defies logic. You also commented that the majority of the public doesn’t care enough about Kiefer to follow the details of his life/relationships, which, in your analysis seems to negate the need for a PR campaign. So, you’re saying that he doesn’t need a PR campaign because he’s such a non-entity anyway. Again, that defies logic. Maybe, just maybe, he wants/his people want/Fox wants to advance his profile (i.e., because he went to jail after receiving another DUI charge and violating probation for his last one, because he has only one remaining year in his “24" contract, after this year, because ratings aren’t what they used to be on “24", because he hasn’t had a stellar film career in more than a decade ... don’t wish to sound harsh, but I need to make a point) to something beyond being a non-entity. Portraying a more family-friendly image, and trying to raise his public profile in general, would broaden his public appeal at this stage in his maturing career. Some of the controversy surrounding whether he’s engaged or not did raise his profile, and not in a bad way, imo.
In any case, given my admission that I’m not entirely objective, I suppose it’s only prudent for me to step away from this thread. But before I do, I want to make one last (I promise) point: I NEVER said that Kiefer and Siobhan don’t have/haven’t had a personal relationship. Of course they have/or have had. I know you made a qualifier to the effect that not everyone is making that point, and I appreciate that, but I want to state clearly that I unequivocally fall into the category of being someone who wouldn’t be foolish enough to draw the conclusion that their relationship is/was only about PR.
I also step away with the certain knowledge, that, as always, you will respond to this post in what is, imo, your almost obsessive need to have the last word. So, have at it, Christy!! LOL
Hey, Suzanne (I think that's you from your writing style, but your signature got cut off), I apologize if I misjudged you. You're right that it's not a very "Kiefery" thing to do, but it *was* your lack of objectivity re: Siobhan that led me to it... and thanks for copping to the unKieferiness of that too,
Couple of things, I definitely don't deny that publicity is part of Kiefer's business and I'm not incensed (even slightly) at the suggestion that this relationship is more a PR campaign than it is something else. It's just that, when your analysis started to sound like the standard looking-for-reasons-to-bash-Siobhan-and-doubt-the- relationship-just-based-on-disliking-her, it started to lose credibility for me. I understand what you're saying about how this further PR campaign (beyond the post-DUI effort which was necessary because his already-raised-and-in-a-bad-way-by-the-DUI profile) could be seeking to raise his profile in a positive, career-advancing way. It makes *way* more sense to me presented in that way than it does as being solely linked to FOX being punitive post-DUI.
I agree that neither of us - NONE of us here - can know what's inside his head... or Siobhan's head... or any of the people around him in the business' heads, etc. Normally, I try to be really good about including "it seems to me", "in my opinion" etc in my posts, but you're right that sometimes in response to the ongoing speculation-presented-as-fact (by people with a clear lack of knowledge about the business, much less credentials in it) can goad me into doing the same thing back, e.g., the "major fallacy" statement. My bad. :)
Suzanne or Christy whomever you may be...Kiefer didn't need to portray himself in a family/friendly image. You have both said, Kiefer has only a handful of fans. The little bit of fans he does have were the ones who seen all the pics, not the little bit ones in the mags. There were only a few of them in the papers,then Kiefer would say, "There was nothing going on with them". Loud and clear. In People Mag. they had one very small pic of Kiefer at the beach and isn't it strange, with all the pics, the Photo in the mag. was of Kiefer by himself. The only person who is making a issue about Kiefer & SB is Christy/Suz. Fans on the other sites got over the pics & ring very fast. This site is the only site that hasn't because Christy keeps bringing that issue up over & over. As Suzanne, she gave us another rerun gone bad, updating old stuff just to remind everyone what site they were on and who it was about.People were talking about other interest things on this site. You don't own it. The pics on this site are 6 mos old, get over it Christy/Suz.
She wasn't there on the Lettermen show or the other shows to give the family/friendly image, now was she. If he wanted to make a family/friendly image they could have showed pics with his daughter.With Kiefer and SB pics the only thing it did for his image was make the fans say, "Oh another woman to add to his list of many". And only a HANDFUL of fans at that. I guess the strip club pics cleared up his image too. WOW!
Everyone has a right to their opinion & to speculate of course but the nastiness displayed was very immature calling someones opinion silly and utterly ridiculous.
BTW Christy/Suz...I can say the same thing about your utterly ridiculous & silly opinions which actually amounts to nil.
Actually, 8:35am, though I don't know (just as none of us does), I don't think that the "it's all publicity" angle likely is true. I was just saying that the way that Suzanne presented that possibility in her latest post - i.e., that it could be a concerted effort from Kiefer and his people and possibly FOX as well - made more sense to me than did the idea that it was a punitive action by FOX.
I'm only Christy, so I can't speak for Suzanne, but I'm not overly interested in the rings. Never have been.
I don't know what the nature of their relationship is or isn't, but Kiefer and Siobhan were photographed together yesterday. So, whatever it is, it's not in the past.
Oh - and the only thing that I called ridiculous was the theory that 24's ratings were in any way linked to ITYTKM, which was and is ridiculous.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I just want to clear up that Iam Edika, and have not been posting under Christy.I have two degrees from one of the best Universities in the UK and I have all the crdentials so I'm sorry if I have sounded unprofessional in my posts.I have read back through my comments and I also agree that I was alittle harsh toward someone who I do not personally know and I apologise for that.I didn't intentionally not mention Kiefer being gay for two reasons,one because I wanted to think about it and two I thought that the main discussion going on at the time was Siobhan.I respect 1/2 1/2 for sticking to her opinion andI myself have a slight niggle that he possibly could be for a few reasons that will take too long to post right now.From a pofessional viewpoint I agree with Suzanne.24 is beginning to run its course,it won't last forever as there are new successful shows popping up all the time.Kiefer also makes alot of money with Ad contracts and I think he is "making the most of it"whilst it lasts.It's true,no matter how much we like him on a personal level that he hasn't had a blockbuster film for years so making him look better,in any way,is important to a show that has had fewer ratings and a poor season six.
Edika
Oh right Christy now your saying no one has any knowledge of how the industry works, but you. How insulting!
I believe someone "pointed" that out to you about how BIG Jay Leno is in the industry. He gets inside information on the stars before the fans do, he is a inside person, has knowledge on Who is Who and what rumors are going around, it his business to know this information.
Jay Leno's show is not just in the States but around the globe like 24 and to say his comment on the "Gay-Jack Bauer" issue was completely silly and was utterly ridiculous, that only a handful of fans would pick up on it just shows everyone that your knowledge is sorely lacking in that department.
1/2 & 1/2
The shows ratings did drop down for S6 on 24. I enjoyed it very much. I really couldn't figure out why the press wrote bad reviews on it. "Maybe" it did have something to do with the Jay Leno "Gay-Jack Bauer" issue plus I do recall the gay stuff going around about Kiefer.
Jay Leno can have a big impact on people. "Gay-Jack Bauer", who would want to watch a Gay-Jack Bauer. Didn't see that show. Jay Leno knew something, to come up with a joke like that or he wouldn't have done it.
Someone else already brought up the stuff about this might be Kiefer's last season for 24. He is plannig to move on to other things. Probably if this season doesn't make the ratings. You talk so much about Siob that you are way "behind" on this issue. Glad some people have other things to say besides mentioning her. I for one want to know about Kiefer and 24.
Suzanne, I am terribly sorry you don't intend to post here anymore. I have really enjoyed your insight on this topic and hope you will change your mind and come back at some point.
It's just a shame that some have to ruin everything for others. *sigh*
hi folks..are we allowed to post links here to other sites? my friend showed me today pictures of kiefer mixing it up with 2 blonde norwegian babes in nyc on sat night. no siobhan in sight.
Suzanne, I hope that is not true about you not posting because your insight has been wonderful and actually helped me fill in alot of blanks that I've had as relates to this whole issue. Please don't stop posting.
And Edika, I would love to hear your thoughts about Kiefer as well if you do find the time to post them here. It's just all helpful insight into a personality who is hard to pin down and I assume he wants it that way but that shouldn't stop us from trying, lol....
Just a note on the Leno issue. I was in L.A. when Kiefer was promoting Mirrors and actually in the audience for Craig Ferguson's show. I don't know whether Kiefer would have gone on Jay's show or not, but the option wasn't there that week because Leno didn't tape any shows because of the Olympics.
Hi Linda,Well to be brutally honest,I'm completely conflicted with my views here and my first degree was in Psychology with Sociology!so that may have been a waste:(lol.I tend to like to think that I'm generally good at analysing people,but he has me very confused!He is such a complex person I'm not sure that anyone will ever really know him.I feel that due to his childhood and past he has alot of issues going on and I hope this makes sense to you but I always feel that he is looking for approval from men but that doesn't necessarily mean that he is gay of course just that his father was absent alot in his early years which may be the reason.He does seem to enjoy the company of men and seems to me,to be looking for something that is missing in his life,although I'm not sure what.To feel secure as a person I guess is the obvious answer.On the other hand there are photos when he is with men where he seems to be looking at them in a way I can't quite work out.Lust,admiration?I really don't know.I've seen photos lately where he is messing around with Woody H in the Cowboy Way(not that I'm saying Woody is gay btw!)and there are certain mannerisms he sometimes has where I have thought "Mnn,I just wonder.."This may sound like crap but it's just a thought.I could talk about him all day,he really is a fascinating subject! lol
I agree that everyone was really having a great discussion over alot of things until someone opened their big mouth over something so silly!
She was only "wondering" if it had anything to do with the ratings. Not that she knew for "sure".
She was making a point and speculating, like everyone else. Get over yourself!
Edika: I'm in agreement with what you had to say about Kiefer on the gay subject but you also forgot that drinking and drugs can come into play. Of course like you said, you could probably go on farther with a person like Kiefer being so complex. So can I go on about the gay subject with him which I have done.
But alot of things confuse me too with Kiefer but I guess that is why I'm still 1/2 & 1/2. Maybe you can explain Catherine. He was on and off with her 3 different times. Alot of affection showed in public with her. For show? Used her? Why? He had Kelly. Catherine is my "only" piece of the puzzle left.
Unless he was still with John English?
1/2 & 1/2
in case anyone is interested, there are pictures of kiefer from sat night in ny on kiefer's place, and he was not with siobhan.
Hey 10:56 ... I don't know if you're allowed to post a link here, but I'd really like to see your pics. Why not try Elizabeth's Place!!!
Hi 1/2 1/2.Well I'm no expert but I think you may have been answering your own question all along.That he is in fact bisexual?It's certainly a possibility from what we have seen and you are right about the drink/drugs too.I'm not sure we will ever truly know as like we have said he is a very complicated guy.Edika
10:56 The link has been posted on Kiefer's Place.
10:56 the link has been posted on kiefer's place
Thanks...Been to Kiefer's Place and read translation, video & saw the pic's. I would like to know who the guy was he left with. From the back it looked like Rocco.
That site really dislikes Siob. WOW
I've been reading these posts & thought I would respond to the last one. I've seen that guy with Kiefer before. I'm not sure if he's a friend or a minder or both. But I remember seeing a video from last summer where that guy is leaving a restaurant with Kiefer in LA and the valet runs to get the car, and there's a brief view of a brunette there too. Some folks have thought that was Siobhan in the video clip too. That's just one example I can think of where I've seen that guy before, but I know I've seen him with Kiefer before.
As for Siobhan, I think lots of Kiefer's fans dislike her because they suspect she may be manipulative; who knows?
Thanks...went to the site also. Bet 1/2 & 1/2 would like to see it. Especially him leaving with a guy instead of the 2 girls. Don't know what went on inside until 7 in the morning,except drinking.
Could be Rocco, not sure. They walked away arm in arm. Kinda blows you away!
Well, Siobhan wasn't in that video, that's for sure. And NO 2 guys walk away arm in arm even if they are drunk & friends. Besides Kiefer didn't do a bad job getting the 2 girls into a taxi.
Gee, maybe it was one of theses PR's setups or Photo-ops. Where are the Paps & reporters when you need them?
This might satisfy 1/2 & 1/2 curiosity.
Wonder if Siob is burning up inside. Guess another bachelor party??
No...He was out with his guy.....friend and she was out with her girl....friend.
Why would she be upset about that?
Guess Kiefer blow-up the PR's theory.
He pays them plenty to fix things. Can't wait to see the results. Maybe more pics from the Beach??
6:06, how would you know what Siobhan was doing unless you know her, just asking.
6:10, I don't think Kiefer blows-up their theory at all. He probably didn't expect to be pictured and filmed in that bar but notice he did show up walking with Siobhan the next day even though he didn't spend the Saturday night before with her. Btw, if he and Sib are so serious wouldn't you think they would be together on a Saturday night considering he only comes to NYC for a brief visit. I mean if they spent all week together then maybe I could explain it away but otherwise not sure how to explain that other than to say they are just friends or it is a PR campaign or some of both....
As for the guy who left with Kiefer while I don't know who he is, he has been seen with Kiefer before. He was in the ITYTKM documentary but more recently he was the driver in early July 08 when Kiefer showed up with Darla Gordon at a concert.
A little bit late in the season for them, do you think?
Maybe something along the
FALLIE........side. Some fall leaves wouldn't hurt in the background. I know, a setting in the woods with the fall leaves dropping. Must set the stage for the handful of fans.
5:29, I agree with you about the two of them walking arm and arm in that video. I know he was drinking and maybe he was abit wobbly but I agree he seemed to be ok getting the girls in that cab.
Also, I don't see him holding onto Siobhan like that. She holds onto him but not the other way around, just saying.....
Maybe 1/2 & 1/2 has an opinion on that one...
Can't wait for the Fall Pics... Talk to you later.
6:32 We agree with you. Maybe you can't wait for the FALL PICS too. That will be followed with a story line...
6:39 Talk to ya
6:46, well please don't tell me that the Fall Pics, whatever those are include something with Sib. Can't take this storyline any longer, lol....
I notice he's not wearing that ring that's caused so much controversy ..
I really think that was just a ring in his jewelry box which he decided to wear on those 2 more formal events: the charitable event in San Diego and the press event for "24".....
Kiefer was just pretending!
1/2 & 1/2
Edika, I agree with you that Kiefer may be bisexual... at least I've long thought that was a possiblity. I agree about a lot of the other psychological observations you made.
Suzanne, I hope you don't stop posting too. There's nothing wrong with having an acknowledged bias. :)
Other stuff... I think that the guy with Kiefer is Florian Ammon, a sound engineer who worked on ITYTKM and I think works a lot with Jude/IW in general. I think he was charged with getting Kiefer home that night... or morning, as the case may be.
It's not really true that 24's ratings went down significantly in s6. That was the year that MOST shows started to see a ratings decline related to the changes in the ways that people watch TV, i.e., people started watching on DVRs and online. When those methods were measured, 24's overall ratings that season were flat compared to s5 or, depending on the measure, slightly better than s5.
I'm on an active 24 board on FOX... one where a lot of people, major fans of Kiefer and just passing fans of Kiefer, male and female, tend to watch when he's on talk shows and, though lots and lots of people posted about how funny that bit with Leno was (where Kiefer did multiple takes of "drop the gun!", including the one that made Jay say "gay Jack Bauer?") and not one single person mentioned the "gay" thing... except by way of thinking the entire bit was funny. Not one person. And people on that board mention *any* and *every*thing that actually catches their attention. It really and truly wasn't a big deal. That doesn't mean that Kiefer's not gay or bisexual or whatever. He could be. But that Leno line didn't raise regular ol' viewers' eyebrows.
Signature cutoff again. That was me. :)
p.s. you can Google Florian for a look at his pic (on his MySpace).
I wonder how Siobhan feels now after these new pics?Is it just me or does he seem to be goig out of his way now show that he isn't with her.They are just friends.If there was a relationship or were even serious and getting married as some have suggested, then Siobhan would be pissed at this new piece of info.Maybe it will clear up once and for all though that he really is single.:)And it is Florian.It's a shame that he seems to be drunk too but at least he is not driving.
maybe they had an argument or something, it does happen, they were seen together the next day. I'm just saying there can be many explanations for a situation, particularly when you don't actually know what the correct one is :-)
Well, if he is only in town for what amounts to a very few days than even if they had an argument it doesn't say much for them if one whole night of the few days is spent getting drunk in a bar and hanging with two blonds. Btw, if Florian wasn't charged with taking him home he probably would have left with those blonds.
Also, how sad for a grown man of 40 something to have to have other grown men babysit him...just saying
Do we actually know when he was due to start back on 24. I know 24 started filming again on thursday 9th but was kiefer due to film then? Maybe ( just a possibility ) he wasn't due back to film until this week, he doesn't film every day. He could have been in New York all last week or longer. I don't like how drunk he seems to get, but it is his business as long as he is not hurting anyone else. Again this is just speculation on my part, but I could see Kiefer giving the explanation " I'm about to start an intense period of filming ( last 6 episodes ) so I deserve a night out first" or something to that effect lol. Whether he's fooling himself is his concern.
Of course it's his life and i'm waiting any explanation from him. Strange to see he was out this saturday without Siobhan ? I'm sad to see him drunk like this and those two girls who play with him just to take pictures from them with the star Kiefer Sutherland...he is like a toy and they do what they want with him... poor man.
As for Siobhan, i think she is used as Catherine used to be, i don't think he's or will be faithful to her.
And she is among girls who don't care about Kiefer being drunk or going with other women, she is like her dog who follows him and his money when kiefer desires it. I have seen the pic from sunday, she always smile in front of the camera LOL...poor girl, i don't know why ?
I was in NYC for the weekend, Friday too. Do you know how Hot it was? Too hot for the sweather he had on and her coat. It was cold in the evening when the sun went down, but the pic was taken in the day. You can't go by the dates all the time. They had to be pics for last year or early spring this year.
The video and pics of the 2 girls. They are saying on that site (orginal site) that dates are also wrong, dated on 1/1/06. Kiefer was away with Rocco & the band then. The scence looks like NY to me & the taxi. I'm not sure about all of this. Like I am with the NYC pic of KS & her. It was great weather in NYC over that weekend. Unless they like to sweat.
We had the Spring/Summer Premier, can't wait for the Fall Premier...
Kiefer didn't look to drunk to me, he did get the 2 girls the taxi without a problem. I don't think Kiefer needs a minder or a person in charge with getting him home, when Kiefer just lives right down the street from the Spotted Pig. He probably knows the owns from visiting so much after moving into his new place. Guess we know Siob doesn't live close by. Kiefer was having to much fun.
The data has to be new, the 1/1/06 is totally off, as we all know. The person with him wasn't Rocco, I stopped the video to check him out. He was the driver with Darla Gordon & Kiefer and was in the Doc, ITYTKM.
1:16
Thanks for the info on the 3 Hot days in NYC.
Oh BTW 1:27...About The Fall Premier. When do you think that show will start?
I'm at 2:50pm
The Fall Premier might be on October 18th Sweetest Day (coughing, coughing) but I wouldn't mind Halloween (laughing). Nothing can out do April Fool's Day. Don't you think?
Oct 16th is National Boss Day. It would jack up the ratings!!! Right from the TV Guide on how ratings work. (HEHEHE)
I think those Spotted Pig pics are from this past Saturday. Someone asked the blogger the question and they responded "yesterday" which would have been Saturday, October 11th since the date of the question was Sunday, October 12th. They answer about the date on question #2.
I don't know about Kiefer and Siobhan but Kiefer is known to wear sweatshirts when others are wearing t-shirts, LOL. I agree I thought it was rather warm on Sunday here in NY so I can't believe Siobhan was wearing that leather jacket but who knows....it's possible it was cooler in the city.
i have any doubt about the date in this pub, the person on the pics has confirmed it was last saturday and his clothes are the same from April 2008 when he went dinner with Siobhan at the waverly.
For the one with Siobhan, i don't know.
Well, to me Kiefer looked really drunk and helpless and when I see those pics I really pity him. I wondered about the NY weather, too, as the weather forecast in our newspaper said it was warm and sunny, and then Kiefer with a scarf and jacket? BTW: can't wait for the fall premiere, too, rotfl.
I'm with you there that the two blondes treated Kiefer like a famous toy and I do not like it very much that they had to post this on the internet.
I think I did see a couple of the pics you guys are talking about...He does look a bit tipsy in one of them..need some more pics!
To Kiefer's Fans...Please stop commenting on the 2 blonds. The one blond, not the pretty one but the one with short hair is a Norwegian: Fashion Editor for a Norway Mag. plus a Journalist for iNewYork.no. Kiefer knew the two girls. Her name is Randi H. Svendsen aka Randi H. Smith. Look it up if you don't believe. The other girl lives with her in NY.
Ask yourself this question?? How could they record the video, when they were in the taxi? Who took the video and gave it to them, to put on their site? Same with the pics. Then they pretended not to know Kiefer. They party with alot of stars. Check the original site and translate it into English or google her name. The 2 girls came to this site and posted it and on others to get your reaction for the fun of it. (It's above). Its obvious since he met Siob, they both have been playing games with "his" fans. In my opinion this is NOT specutation.
That's also why she was snickering in the photo 10/12, the next day at the camera. Probably also provided by a friend.
It's so nice to know, how much Kiefer cares for his handful of FANS. I hope someone will pass this message on as they did to us. Maybe then, she will wipe the snicker off her face. Everyone was right, she is a bitch!
BTW...if you don't know how to translate the page use the right click on your mouse and go to translate page.
6:25, I am confused. Why would Kiefer do a mean thoughtless thing, if that is what you are implying to his fans. Is there a reason Siobhan wasn't with them?
I could definitely believe Kiefer knows these girls, btw cause why would he just pick them out to party with and have the bar closed just for them. That didn't make much sense. Also, it did seem odd that they had video and all.....
To tell you the truth, this whole thing since Siobhan started up with him doesn't make sense.
Are you saying their whole relationship is a fake. I have thought that anyway basically so you would just be confirming it although not sure why Kiefer would resort to that unless he is hiding something. What, I don't know for sure.....
6:25, so do the 2 blonds know Kiefer through Siobhan? Are you saying they took the pictures and video with or without Kiefer's knowledge? They might have thought they were having fun but it's not very nice of them to mislead people on purpose. In other words, lie; some journalist, lol.
You lost me on your post. You basically just throw out accusations especially about Kiefer without any proof. I don't think it is fair that you are accusing Kiefer of misleading his fans unless you have something to go on, just saying.
6:25 - I'm confused too. What "games" do you mean?
6:25 Are you the one claiming to know both Kiefer and Rocco who posted here earlier?.. and why would Sib play games with 'his' fans?.. Nobody cares what she thinks
Like others here I dont quite get your post.
Kiefer has never played 'games' with his fans before and I dont believe he is doing it now..
What reason would he have?...
Yes, Seems like Kiefer & Siob are trying to make us look like fools. They are reading what people are posting on the sites. They were trying to make the video and pics come off like he was Bisexual. That's what everyone was talking about at the time. Go back and check out what Edika & Christy said.
She gave you plenty of proof. Look up the "original site" www.inewyork.no or Kieferplace site to get the link. Off to the right side you will see the one girl with short blond hair in other pics. Read the articles.
In the video clip we seen Kiefer put the 2 girls in the..taxi.. and he walked away arm in arm with his friend (from behind he looked like Rocco) from ITYTKM....A bisexual look!
If the 2 girls were not taping them, who was? How did the 2 girls get the video clip to add to their web site so soon?
Yes Siob knew the girls. It was Siob doing the taping, she was following them from behind. Kiefer lives right down the street.
They did the same to us with the beach pics and the rings etc:
Read what 6:34pm said again:
Kiefer & Siob have been playing games with us from the start. She wants to get back at Kiefer's fans for the bad things everyone was saying about her.
Let's face it "NOBODY" likes her even on the other sites.
Remember the rings and the one Kiefer wore too confuse everyone! They were reading the sites.
I knew all along that something wasn't right. Like she was following the sites. Kiefer does not know to much about the internet (unless he is lying) but...she does.
He's a drunk, he's been to jail,....do you really think he is Mr. Perfect and doesn't tell lies.
Strange...with his interviews on TV he comes off looking in control but then you see his disorder conduct. Jail time is proof of that.
Yea, I can believe he is involved and going along with it.
Besides...his friends will go along with anything as long as he is paying. They are having fun with this too.
I think some people who post here are verging on the delusional
I agree. There is no proof of this. none at all..and he looks slightly drunk in the pics (which would explain the arm around his friend)
I dont believe Kiefer would read a fans post and then retaliate against it. He cant be that immature,can he?...and what so special about Sib that he feels he should play games with his fans?
he knows his fans are just that. .Fans.
You need to provide more proof than that to convince me.
Oh come on ... As I've said before, I think that *part* of their relationship has been about PR, but really! This is self-destructive behavior, if done on purpose. The last thing in the world Kiefer *should* want is to have the Spotted Pig pics/video to be made available for public consumption. And, strictly from a woman's perspective, the last thing I suspect Siobhan wanted was to have pics of Kiefer distributed publicly where he's intoxicated and flirting with other women in a bar at dawn. These images are unflattering to both of them, in different ways. So, as other people have asked, I too ask ... UNLESS THEY ARE SELF-SABOTEURS, AND/OR DOWNRIGHT FOOLISH, WHY WOULD THEY CONSTRUCT THIS PARTICULAR SCENARIO????? Are you saying that Kiefer cares that little for his public image? Are you saying that Siobhan is trying to tarnish his image? If so, why?
And DON'T say it's to have fun at the expense of fans, because I'm guessing Kiefer and Siobhan have much better things to do with their time, as do I, for that matter. LOL
Suzanne
OK everybody,Iam officially confsed! I really don't know what to think anymore.It seems anything maybe possible with this situation.BTW Can people start putting names,I'm getting mixed up with all the anonymous :)
I'll start out by stating that I am not now and never have been a fan of Siobhan due to the fact that I felt she was a manipulator, etc. and given that she hails from the Fashionista World only enhanced my negative view of her.
I have also doubted the seriousness of Kiefer's relationship with her mostly in part because he come out so dramatically to put her and this relationship out there. Hence, I agree wholeheartedly with the PR lady, Suzanne that this whole thing may have been PR driven by either Fox or Kiefer or both of them together.
That said with regard to this past Saturday and the 2 blonds, I was under the impression that there was a gentleman who was with them and that he was either the operator of the blog or a close friend of the blogger, one of the two blonds. So it is most likely that he took the pictures and also the video. Now that said, I do find it odd (although with regard to Kiefer nothing would surprise me) that this guy or anyone would suddenly whip out a video camera without Kiefer's consent or knowledge. Also, if you watch the beginning of the video, Kiefer looks back at whoever is holding the camera and clearly approves his being filmed walking away. It does also look odd to me with him walking arm in arm with Florian in that situation but remember it's also very odd that a 40-something man has other gentlemen acting as babysitters for him. That's what people like Florian and Michael appear to be. Florian was with Kiefer when he appeared very drunk at the concert with Darla Gordon.
It's not impossible that Kiefer is play acting. Stranger things have happened. But with that said, I think these 2 blonds who are also Fashionistas (or at least one is) are frauds and are lying since that is what they have done from the beginning. They seem to be getting their kicks out of the game playing. So for their part they are not only lying but are not very nice.
If Kiefer and Siobhan are a real couple then there is no reason for them not to be pictured together at this club or leaving it. There is no need to play games. There is no need to have a picture taken the next day, etc. Btw, Siobhan looks like she is smiling not smirking and Kiefer as usual looks statue like and unimpressed with her or anything.
One thing for those of you posting that Kiefer is playing his fans for fools is that unless you really have some concrete proof or those 2 blonds want to go on their own site and clean up what they posted originally to be more truthful, then you are being very unfair to Kiefer to try and damage the one good reputation he has and that is his good relationship with his very loyal fans.
This is the end of my post continued in case it gets cut off. Apologies for the extra posting for those who see the whole thing.
It's not impossible that Kiefer is play acting. Stranger things have happened. But with that said, I think these 2 blonds who are also Fashionistas (or at least one is) are frauds and are lying since that is what they have done from the beginning. They seem to be getting their kicks out of the game playing. So for their part they are not only lying but are not very nice.
If Kiefer and Siobhan are a real couple then there is no reason for them not to be pictured together at this club or leaving it. There is no need to play games. There is no need to have a picture taken the next day, etc. Btw, Siobhan looks like she is smiling not smirking and Kiefer as usual looks statue like and unimpressed with her or anything.
One thing for those of you posting that Kiefer is playing his fans for fools is that unless you really have some concrete proof or those 2 blonds want to go on their own site and clean up what they posted originally to be more truthful, then you are being very unfair to Kiefer to try and damage the one good reputation he has and that is his good relationship with his very loyal fans.
Suzanne, so glad you are weighing in and I agree with you.
Btw, that is my post above 6:11. I forgot to post my name.
How can a "handful" of fans tarnish his image? Who are we? I believe Christy said that a million times. Siob is doing this to make his fans look like fools. So why not?
Your not giving any proof either only PR stuff again.
Who is the girl with the short blond hair? Tell us that. How did she get the video clip?
I really don't want any "PR" stuff by guessing. "It could be this" or "it could be that". Give us a break!
Who is the girl? How did she get the Clip?
Hey Linda ... The 2 blonds are lying? I haven't been following too closely. What have they been lying about?
Thanks for filling me in.
Suzanne
Why would the 2 blondes want to tarnish Kiefer by putting the pics and video out there for fans to see of him drunk?
I thought they were having a "good time" with him!!
btw, IF FLORIAN IS SUCH A GOOD FRIEND AND IS THERE TO TAKE CARE OF KIEFER. WHAT HAPPEN??? DID HE FALL ASLEEP ON THE JOB?
Suzanne, the 2 blonds made it seem that they had met Kiefer at the bar and they were just fans. That is the impression they gave certainly to me.
According to "Anonymous" who won't reveal who she/he is it turns out that these 2 women actually not only knew Kiefer but are part of a scheme with Siobhan to make his fans look bad.
Very odd.
Do people really think Kiefer has nothing better to do than to humiliate his own fans. Why would he bother. As for Florian, I don't believe he fell asleep on the job. I believe I stated that there was another individual, a gentleman, who was with these ladies. I believe he took the pictures and the video and Kiefer was well aware of it. Maybe they asked Kiefer if they could take the pics and the video for their blog. If Kiefer knows them why would that be so out of the realm of possibility.
I am sorry but (and this is coming from someone who doesn't even like Siobhan) why would you believe that she is sitting around all day reading fansites and then working with Kiefer to "get back at us". Do you really think that Kiefer flew 3,000 miles to be in NYC for what appears to be a few days at the very least just to pull some stunt on his fans?
I am not judging you but I don't understand your reasoning here.
It looked to me that Kiefer was out partying alone without Siobhan and she's desperatly trying to hang on by been seen with him the following day. Thats the impression I get.
6:54, why would Siobhan, if that is what you are suggesting.
Also, same thing on Florian. Florian and Michael and maybe a couple others are there to protect Kiefer mostly from himself. They are there for him to go to a bar/club and if he does drink too much he knows that they will keep him from getting behind the wheel or going with someone he shouldn't. They are there to see to it that he makes it home safely. They are not there to run his life, tell him who to hang with, who can take pictures, etc. The idea as I see it is only to get him home safely. If he had Florian or Michael or some other person with him on September 25, 2007 he would not have gone behind the wheel in his condition.
7:12, same impression for me!!
I'm with Suzanne: why would Kiefer & Sib "play with the fans"? The only two persons who look stupid here is Kiefer: beeing drunk again,so shortly after his time in jail, beeing showed as a helpless toy for some women and Sib - who seems not be at the bar, who desperately wants a real relationship with Kiefer - but he is flirting with other women! That's no compliment for her, making her look really foolish! So - playing games with the fans?? Someone played with Kiefer - and maybe with Sib as well - maybe this Norwegian lady doesn't like Sib and wanted to make HER look stupid (I wouldn't be surprised, given they are both "Fashionistas" - or this norwegian lady just likes it to make "Stars" look like fools....
I was commenting about the pics and video just like everyone else the day they came out about how drunk Kiefer was and how Siob was going to react. Where were his loyal fans then, to stop us from talking are foolish heads off? Ever his LOYAL fans were making comments probably under Anonymous. I do feel like a idiot. I'm glad someone was doing some reseach and STOPPING US from going too far.
I appreciate the WARNING that 6:25PM put out yesterday "POSTED to the FANS". The one girl is a journalist in fashion and travels in Kiefer's circle & Siob. He or his friend didn't realize it? HA! Siob wasn't there? HA!
Answer ALL the Questions you loyal fans that believe you know Kiefer so well???
Well I remember everyone talking about the rings she was wearing and the PR's going on and on about it.
Seems funny to me that Kiefer suddenly took a great interest in rings himself.
The only way to explain that move, was for her to be watching the sites or a friend.
Don't forget you loyal fans...Kiefer goes to NY to see his daughter and to have a good time.
He doesn't need anyone watching to make sure he is not drinking & driving because he doesn't have his license back yet. He is on a 18 month program. Its also another reason he likes NY, to get around easier and lots of bars. I guess its convenient having a bar just down the street. With all the bars in NY how convenient the 2 girls JUST HAPPEN to picked that bar! WOW, what LUCK!
7:46, maybe this blond so called journalist was using Kiefer to get her 15 minutes of fame. That is what I think she was doing. And no one said she doesn't know Kiefer although that is how she made it seem herself which means she was making it all up.
Btw, nothing would surprise me with the blond or Siobhan. This is how silly fashionistas behave. They have too much time on their hands. They certainly aren't working hard, lol.
The magazine the blond girl works for in Norway is the same company that owns Allure. How convenient is that?
I would really hate to start THE DUMB BLOND JOKES especially when their are some smart ones.
I loved the video of them trying to kill a bug with the RAID and talking about mice in NY. Maybe if they cleaned their apartment, they wouldn't have the problem.
Sorry, can't help myself "DUMB BLONDS"! Or Fakes.
Well, I agree with Cathy. Neither the pics or video make Kiefer look too good so if he is out to make himself look foolish there is no explaining that. He just comes across as a drunk being used by two strange women in a bar. If he is collaborating with Siobhan and others as you suggest then maybe he isn't working so hard on 24 afterall as he would seem to have lots of free time on his hands and not using it wisely....On the other hand if Siobhan is making him look foolish and collaborating with this woman then she is more manipulating than I thought and Kiefer looks even worse.
It's all not important at all other than we as fans have an interest in all things Kiefer but if he were to do stupid and manipulative things to "fool" his fans I think they including myself would not take kindly to it.
Also, if Kiefer and Siobhan had a "real" relationship they wouldn't have to resort to foolishness.
Btw, yes Kiefer wore a ring but it hardly looked like anything more than a family ring or something to that effect. Also, it came after yet a third engagement denial so if anything, IMHO, it only represented him stating just that "a ring is just a ring" and nothing more in his mind and that people should pay no never mind to her wearing one on her ring finger.
If not, and they are seriously and totally in love with one another about to be married, well, I say "good luck with that" cause the way they have behaved speaks volumes to me for what's in store for him in the future. Better have a prenuptual, Kiefer, LOL!!!
9:06AM...I agree with somethings you're saying but I believe Kiefer got caught this time.
If she wanted the fame she would not have posted something like that about Kiefer or she would never get into the right circle of people again.
No, they thought the fans wouldn't catch on and so did Kiefer. I'm also glad someone was doing some fan spy work. They were making us look like idiots.
Kiefer left his LA fans behind and many more. His pics are all about her. The ring was the perfect example of them spying. I think I seen enough of them playing with us.
I'm sure Kiefer doesn't care if I'm one less fan.
9:49,
Kiefer would not have to be spying on websites with regard to the ring thing. He was asked about Siobhan's ring at three different times for which he had to issue denials. The last denial came right before he wore that ring to two events within two days of one another where he knew there would be photo-ops. It is possible he just wore the ring cause he had it and thought it would look dressy or maybe he did wear it as a statement but I don't necessarily think you should take it that he is playing with his fans. I think he addressed the media and the fans with those denials.
Maybe I am being naive or something but I just don't see Kiefer intentionally deceiving his fans one way or another. Nor do I see him checking out the websites and responding to things people have been writing. There is just no reason for him to do that and in the end it would only hurt him. It makes him look deceitful and uncaring and ungrateful and I don't think those are qualities he would want to put forth. For what purpose would that serve. It wouldn't make any sense at all. Also, why would he want any bad publicity when 24 is all starting up again?
I suppose Siobhan could have been at this bar but why hide? Also, it's very likely given both their careers that Siobhan and this blond would travel in the same circles and know each other. However, many people in these industries hang out in the West Village so it is not unlikely that they would end up in the same place. There are many areas in NYC but isn't it interesting that all we ever see are celebrities walking around in the West Village and Soho areas. That's cause that is where they gravitate to. Also, even if Sibohan and this blond know each other maybe she has also become good friends with Kiefer and they just decided to hang out. Again, just seems silly to me that Siobhan is hanging out at this bar and following them around with a video camera. Unless this woman or the man who was with her, if he is the one operating the blog addresses it there, I don't think we can go with the assumptions being made here.
I feel it is unfair to Kiefer to accuse him or judge him of these deeds. He is not perfect but I don't believe he is vicious or deceitful and that is what is being implied here, IMHO. Sorry I can't buy that.....
It was strange that Christy and the PR were talking about Kiefer being Bi-sexual with 1/2 & 1/2 and then BOOM BAM a video that looked just like that. The girls and then Kiefer leaving arm in arm with some guy. Perfect clip of a bi-sexual man.
Someone was spying on the site and Kiefer was part of it. He's a actor but an act that went south, thinking his fans are gullible. Well, at least one fan (6:25pm) wasn't gullible & falling for his acting skills.
He was drinking but was he really that drunk? Sitting around discussing how to make fools of his fans, especially with his girlfriend. She was there! She's not going to let Kiefer out of her site. She wants her rich man. She wants to make trouble for his fans. She hates all of us because we talk about her, in a none pleasant way. I can believe she put the 2 girls up to it.
What? She doesn't look at Kiefer's fan sites and talk about it to him?
Yes, In my opinion the ring gave him away and he too joined in to have fun with us.
If Sib and this blond knew one another why post something nasty about Kiefer!
There are many, many bars in the West Village and in Soho. Shit there are bars on every corner. Why there? Strange. Sorry, your MAYBE-S are not working for me.
I'm sure Kiefer cares about 24 but I'm also sure he didn't realize he would get CAUGHT!! Just another Drinking & Drunk sighting. Right?
To much confidences or arrogants will lead a person to getting CAUGHT just like his DUI's.
CAUGHT IN THE ACT...
11:08, so he flew 3,000 miles in a few days off just to pull a prank with Siobhan the woman of his dreams and lifelong soulmate, lol......
It doesn't quite seem like he is so enamored with her that he would listen to her harping about some fansites and then act on it, just asking....So I guess we can expect to hear wedding bells soon from what you're saying cause doesn't sound like anything short of the truest of love would get him to go along with this, lol...
Btw, she must be the most insecure woman on the planet although that wouldn't surprise me since she is a fashionista that she actually believes the fans' opinions would determine Kiefer's actions towards her..If he truly loves her then he will just defend her honor, correct???
I do admit it did look strange with him walking away arm and arm with Florian and dare I say, looked acted which confirms your point. I mean he has been more drunk with Michael and we've never seen that so it very well could have been an act. But I actually thought cause he was drunk that he was just acting silly....
I am not judging you, I am just asking a rhetorical question I guess but doesn't the whole thing seem so strange?
And you don't really explain although maybe you just don't know why Kiefer would feel it necessary to do this.
Also, if he was going to do the ring thing then why issue a denial a week or so earlier.....if the ring is something more it just makes him look like an outright liar.
Then again, you seem to be saying he is basically a skunk with a deviant personality who suddenly cares nothing for his fans or maybe never did. Wow, he should win an award for this performance, LOL!!!
Do you ladies hate Siobhan or Kiefer or both?
You have me twisted here. I was confused to begin with on this relationship.
So are you saying Siobhan and Kiefer are "mad for each other" and all his mean fans have annoyed him to the point that he feels it necessary to "get back at them" because we have attacked the woman of his dreams, LOL
I was looking forward to the Fall pics!
This might be a different "FALL"
Sorry but we have absolutely NO proof that she was in the bar.....
Let me throw out this possibility,
I have thought from the beginning that Siobhan is a manipulator, etc. who gets what she wants including her title, Kiefer though manipulation. From that assumption, I have wondered if given the fact that Siobhan works in the very catty world of Fashionistaville why no one has come forth to dish dirt on her cause we know there is some out there. You can't tell me she is not a laughing stock in her world as a result of Kiefer issuing these denials with her name attached to them. She may also have built up lots of hate among many including this woman...
I DO NOT believe and unless someone can prove without a shadow of a doubt otherwise that Siobhan was there at the bar. However, what if these blonds, particularly this one who works for the Allure associated magazine knew he would be there or found out somehow that he would be there and took full advantage of the situation in an effort to make Siobhan not Kiefer look bad. Think about it, this would really embarrass her. I mean these girls were posing with him....
I just don't think this is being done on Kiefer's part. It's not only not necessary it is damaging to him. He would not risk that, IMHO......
12:01 Exactly what I'm thinking!
Thanks Cathy, that was me. Forgot to post my name...
Btw, just a theory on the ring which a friend of mine has mentioned.
His daughter, Sarah recently spent 6 weeks in Amsterdam. Possibly she bought the ring back from there as a gift to him. That would also make sense to me since they recently visited a jewelry store in NYC when she returned from her trip maybe to get the ring sized. If that is the case, Kiefer would have worn the ring at the very public events to send a shoutout to her. Just another possibility in a sea of possibilities, LOL!!
To the one who said... WOW, he should win an award for this performance.
The answers to your questions are right in front of you. Does everyone need to repeat themselves to you.
11:40
I guess you know, not to many people like Siob. With Kiefer...I think everyone is debating on whether he was involved or not.
In my opinion the points are adding up that he was involved and he got caught. To many FACTS leading in that direction not to be true.
12:40, seems like some of you just don't like Kiefer or are waiting for him to "FALL". Don't quite understand why this is. Not sure what you think he did or what he did to you maybe....
But in the absence of proof that Siobhan was in the bar with them on Saturday evening (proof I haven't seen here or anywhere unless you can get the blonds to verify, or you have pictures of her there or if you were there yourself), then I don't know how you can determine that Kiefer is playing his fans. That is an awful strong and nasty charge.
I don't like Siobhan myself and can believe most things about her but sorry I just can't bring Kiefer into this ugly web....!! Just doesn't sound like him.
Kiefer has many many issues I believe and yes, he drinks to much but I think it stops there. I am not now or have I ever seen him being anything but a sincere and kind person to his fans..
Linda your possibilities look good to me but not about the ring or other things that have been mention.
I'm sure the fans including myself don't wish to damage Kiefer in anyway...
But the possibilities are also stacking up against him and if he is involved would that be RIGHT for him to embarrass his fans?
Questions? If the 2 girls hate Sib so much, why would they take it out on Kiefer? The bar was closing but they let Kiefer's party of a few people stay. Why did he let 2 strange girls stay? They just happen to be there? He just happen to let them take pics of him drinking for his nice image? Who took the video clip and gave it them to post? They were already in the taxi, during the video taping, Right? Too many questions and no answers only possibilies!
The possibility of him getting caught is also there.
1:24, what is your theory on the ring or have you stated it already?
1:24, where you confuse me is when you speak about him getting caught. Again, the only reason this would be a story is if you are correctly stating that he and Siobhan are collaborating together to fool the fans. That would mean she would have to have been there and I already stated I don't think she was.
So in the absense of that what would he be caught doing that is so bad as far as his fans are concerned.
To answer your question, I don't think these women were strangers although if Kiefer happened to meet them in this bar and he got drunk and even not so drunk and they told him they were from Norway, I don't see why you wouldn't think he would feel they were attractive and interesting enough that he would want to keep partying with them. I bet it has happened before.
But I am not even saying that he doesn't know them. I think it's possible that he met them through Sib maybe at that Michael Tomson Event; doesn't mean they like her....maybe he liked them then and struck up a conversation and said to them that the next time he is in town "let's get together". Doesn't mean Sib had to be there. I think he is pulling back from Sib. Hence, the picture the next day of her clutching onto him for dear life; she sees him slipping away, IMHO.
As for the pictures and video, I thought the girls were there with some guy. Maybe he is connected with the blog or runs it. Someone said that they meet celebs all the time. They probably always bring all their camera equipment. Maybe they told Kiefer they had a blog and asked if he wouldn't mind his picture be taken; that happens all the time too.
Yes, Kiefer and Fox want a cleaner image for him but he is far from perfect and slips, etc. are going to happen along the way. I think ultimately Kiefer likes to have his fun and will continue to do so albeit much more carefully....
Obviously, I am saying "maybe" but I am not claiming to know for sure. These are my theories. We just don't have proof to others and until or if we do have proof I will not believe the negativity about Kiefer. Don't care about Siobhan but not Kiefer......
1:24, just to add, even though Kiefer has fans who adore him totally doesn't mean everyone loves him.
You asked the question about the two girls being mean to Kiefer to get back at Siobhan. Well, Kiefer could have been a conduit to her, just saying.
If making Kiefer look bad was the price to pay for getting back at her or embarrassing her so be it. That could be their objective. Again, think Fashionistaville!!!
Hey Linda!
I still tend to believe that these two blonds are probably just a couple of goofs who ran into Kiefer and don't have any discretion, but there do seem to be some inconsistencies in their story, so, if I were to believe that someone was conspiring, I'd say it was them (against Siobhan), as per your theory, certainly not Kiefer and/or Siobhan against fans. They have nothing to gain (in reality), and everything potentially to lose.
To those who believe Kiefer is playing with his fans, I'm still not hearing any concrete reasons to support your theory. Please, someone lay out the facts for me, because I'm sure not seeing what you see.
Im sure those two blond girs are reading the posts on this site and laughing at all the controversy and debate they have caused from their night out with Kiefer!
If Kiefer and Sib are trying to make HIS fans look like fools then the only two people who end up looking stupid are Kiefer and Sib!... and my opinion is they are not . Kiefer has better things to do with his time.
Agree Suzanne and Janice,
Suzanne, you mentioned something that I thought of as well. Those two gals have not been forthcoming from the beginning when they first posted.
One bit I caught and I think someone actually asked them for clarification was that they made it seem either by choice or error that Kiefer basically chased everyone out of the bar for himself and them and they partied. That couldn't be further from the truth as they later had to clarify. What actually happened is that the bar was at closing time and therefore within their bounds to send everyone home. At Kiefer's request they kept the place open for him and the gals. This is why I say that we really can't take these ladies to heart because if you look at those two pieces, the first makes Kiefer look really bad, IMHO, but the second and correct one makes him look like a nice guy.
It's the same with the Kiefer and Siobhan fooling their fans theory. Unless these ladies were to confirm that Siobhan was even there than that put big holes in that theory just to start. Even without the knowledge that the whole idea of Kiefer laughing at his fans is beyond inconceivable to be.
I really do think these two women are enjoying their 15 minutes of fame at Kiefer's expense and at ours....just think how many hits their site received using Kiefer's name and fame!!
I don't think there's any real mystery here. Kiefer is single and does what he wants when he wants with whom he wants. He wanted to go out and party on saturday night so he did. When he drinks, his inhibitions fade.
I don't think there was some sort of nefarious plot on the part of Kiefer, Siobhan, or these two women who have the blog.
I think you are forgetting what everybodies first impression of the video clip was about. Here is a reminder:
Kiefer was partying with the girls then in the clip you seen Kiefer walking away arm in arm with another guy. Some thought it looked like Rocco from behind. So backup & rewind and read the comments again.
It looked like a BISEXUAL scene.
Rewind, backup and read what Christy, Edika and 1/2 & 1/2 were talking about "before" the video came out.
Need another reminder: They were talking about Kiefer being gay and Christy & Edika told 1/2 & 1/2 that he might be Bisexual. I'm very sure everyone can remember that!!! If you were paying attention.
I got the same impression as they did. A bisexual video.
The person at 6:25PM put some honest facts out there for the fans. Now you are trying to twist those facts to suit yourself. Those FACTS would have never been put out there if 6:25 didn't do some homework. Everyone, even I would have gone on and on about a drunking Kiefer. 6:25 "STOP" us from making "FOOLS" of ourselves. Even you Linda, Janice Cathy, Suzanna etc etc. You should all be grateful.
A coincidence! I DON'T THINK SO!
6:24, she left out the most important FACT and that was proof that Siobhan was in the bar with them and that she is the one taking the pictures and videotape. That's the only FACT that proves this point that you are trying to make and that is that Kiefer and Siobhan are deceiving his fans and laughing at us while doing so.
Without proof of Siobhan in attendance nothing else matters. Who cares if the women lied about whether or not they knew Kiefer. As someone pointed out they have other information in their story mixed up so to me they are a couple of wacky fashionistas and you are buying their story!!
Meanwhile they get lots of hits on their site....
For Petes Sake..Let it Go!
6:24, remember you are not only attacking Siobhan but Kiefer and you are doing it without solid proof!!
Sorry but it sounds like you are the ones playing with us to me....and it sounds like you may have an ax to grind with Kiefer. Not sure why or what he did to you but that is how it sounds...., just saying
Well Hello 6:24...I'm one of the victims who thought it was Rocco too when I seen the video. I started to believe Christy & Edika that maybe Kiefer was bisexual or gay. Who knows about that? It's still a issue that got derailed, at the perfect moment it would seem.
It's pissing me off that because we believe Kiefer was playing with us that now we are his "hated fans". When the others did nothing but dissect his life too.
WOW...Kiefer might be reading the site and all of the sudden he has all these loyal fans...And the finger pointing, first Sib and now the 2 girls.
Why not point the finger in the right direction? Kiefer & his friends set us up to look like fools. Maybe to take the heat off the gay issue.
Wow. At least one person here (and maybe more... hard to tell whether it's one person posting to herself or what) has crossed over into severely paranoid delusional territory.
... and, as someone (Linda, I think) said, I can't even tell who she hates - Siobhan? Kiefer? both of them? - much less exactly what it is that she's accusing her/him/them of.
Frankly, I find the degree of paranoid delusionality being displayed with that "theory" to be at least a little scary.
7:29, so is Kiefer reading the sites or is Siobhan. See this is the problem. The stories keep changing.....also, again you provide no proof of Siobhan's involvement. I don't like Siobhan and am not happy with their relationship and you are putting me in this position to defend her...too bad.
Maybe it's interesting or not but now that video is no longer available...
hmmmmmmm, maybe the fashionistas got a conscience!!
6:24 and 7:29, the stories seem to be changing...are you blaming Kiefer or Siobhan or both or the two ladies...
Are you trying to say that Kiefer and Siobhan are so tight that they are conspiring against Kiefer's fans or are you saying he is gay and that he and his friends are conspiring against his fans. Where is the proof that Siobhan was even in the bar and she was the one taking the pictures and video; were either of you there...I am sure we can all find common threads that add up to what we think is. Trust me, I have thought to find common threads myself with regard to Kiefer and Siobhan and have still been wrong. I have said this before but I just don't see what it serves for Kiefer to suddenly turn on his fans. Are you saying he has always laughed at his fans or just all of a sudden he decided that he doesn't need them any longer and who cares if he insults them. Do you just totally discount what Suzanne, a professional PR person has outlined here. She has told us how the business works. You know what, this thing that Kiefer is supposedly doing would cause damage....Kiefer relies on his fans and now more than ever. If Kiefer were reading the site and saw gay speculation then he could just go out publicly with Siobhan and show PDA.....
Hard to believe that Kiefer would go to all the trouble of plotting some deceitful scheme against a handful of fans at some godawful hour in the morning(it was probably about 6 or 7am) to make fools of us. Hes not 21.Hes 41.
I mean what a childish prank to pull!and way below Kiefer.
Delusional posts here. Absolutely!.
Linda. You are absolutely correct when you said Kiefer relies on his fans now more than ever.
He has always said he appreciates the support from his fans and that 24 wouldnt have the success it has without them.
He would never risk all that.
Linda, I'm at 1:24..you must have me confused with someone else because I didn't say anything about Siob being at the bar that night and I never said anything about Kiefer & Siob collarborting together.
What I was replying to was...I wish it was that easy to blame Siob as a possibility to what you were implying about her. I never said or implied she was there.
There were just alot of questions I was asking about.
I also said the "possiblities" of him being caught are there.
I wish "everyone" would read peoples comments over a few times before they make a comment in return. Thanks
8:44pm - when you say "I also said the 'possibilities' of him being caught are there." what do you mean by "caught"? Caught at what?
I'm just completely confused.
I know...your always completely confused. Wasn't it you who said, Kiefer was "BISEXUAL"? Are you still confused? Do you hate him that much? To go and spread rumors around about him. I think you confused alot of people with your bisexual comments. I don't think anyone what's to hear your comments. Take them somewhere else!
Linda, I agree with you that Kiefer never ever would play his fans. I am a 1000 percent sure of that. Just another thought came to my mind: you are all so very much convinced that the picture with Sib was taken the next day, and it says so on the picture site. But in my opinion this could be very wrong. If Kiefer has left the bar at 7.00 a.m., he would have had a terrible hangover and not looked rather well, as one can even take from the small pic. And at that day it was very hot in NY. Why should Kiefer wear a long pullover and Sib a leather-jacket when it was that hot? IMO this is an old pic, and now my two cents:
Maybe Kiefer broke up with Sib. She was furious, got in touch with the fashionistas she knows and asked them to take pictures and a video of drunk Kiefer and to put it onto the internet??
They even uploaded it on youtube, where it has been deleted now.
12:31, you are correct, we really don't know when that pic was taken and it's odd only one pic showed up. Usually we get a set. Yes, Sunday was warm and sunny. It looks like an overcast cooler day in the pic (Sib's hair seems to be blowing) but it's really hard to tell for sure.
Also, while we don't know for sure that Kiefer and Sib have broken up I do believe he has at the very least pulled back from her and they are certainly not what they were in April and May. You have a possible theory going here which could be cause these girls seemed to be using Kiefer and yes, they have now removed that video which is curious to me. Another possibility is that they called her when they saw Kiefer there but who knows. This theory certainly makes more sense than Kiefer conspiring with anyone against his fans in reaction to what they are saying on fansites.
12:31, of course there may not be any theory at all. Just Kiefer out like he's been many many times before just having fun and it got caught on tape this time.....
I think Linda is taking everybodies comments and taking them out of contents. She is not responsing to the right people.
I didn't mention Sib in my comments "either", just that people were pointing the finger in her direction, which wasn't fair since we don't know if she was there.
Your have no proof to speculate on your theory about Sib and Kiefer's relationship. Your again pointing the finger and blaming her.
We do know "one thing" Kiefer was there!
Well to be fair to me it's difficult to respond to people accurately when you don't post your names or maybe you just don't like what I have to say and want to pile on.
As for Kiefer and Siobhan's relationship, I am not claiming to know for sure I am just stating my opinion on the matter which the last time I checked is still permitted.
With regard to pointing a finger at Siobhan with this whole matter of the Spotted Pig incident, I did no such thing. Some others seem to be including her in whatever conspiracy theory they are attached to by saying she was the one taking the pictures. IMHO, she was not even there.......
Your have no proof to speculate on your theory about Sib and Kiefer's relationship. Your again pointing the finger and blaming her.
We do know "one thing" Kiefer was there!
October 17, 2008 4:12 AM
Posted by: Anonymous
You sound mad at Kiefer, am I misunderstanding you???
3:48 AM, apologies if I misdirected my response towards you. Hard to keep track of emails by using times instead of names.
Sounds like you and I are in agreement...we seem to be saying the same thing about Siobhan.
11:14pm, no, I'm not "always confused" - but people's unwillingness to post their names, not to mention the lack of clarity in the "theory" that one or more people is posting about - is making this a very confusing conversation... for everybody.
Yes, I said that I think that it's possible that Kiefer's bisexual. I always have thought that. *If* it's true (and I don't know it for sure; it's just something I think is possible), I don't think it's surprising or a big deal.
So... is your theory that he got "caught" out with a man?
Is your outrage about the fact that, if he's not 100% heterosexual, you feel "betrayed" by him?
Even if so, what do the two girls and Siobhan and Kiefer have to do with this being some kind of conspiracy? You're still not making yourself clear about that.
Why a conspiracy theory going on over the bisexual v-clip. The last time I checked it was still permitted to state ones opinion. If there is no theory at all why the defense department and the removal of the bisexual clip? First it was a innocent clip but now your claiming it's a conspiracy theory clip. Which one is it or are you still confused? Why remove the clip, which is curious to me, if nothing was wrong with it?
What, do you "own this site" who are you to dictate whether we need to put a name. Last time I looked it was "optional" and this site belongs to X17 or have you forgotten!
Open up your own site if you want to start dictating rules or hushing people on their opinions on this site.
They removed the bisexual v-chip from the site because it was probably too bisexual to show of Kiefer and his partner and the 2 girls were probably just doing their job and following through with Kiefer's orders. Sorry, I missed out on it. Money can buy anything, even silence. Kiefer been drunk plenty of times like in the xmas tree v-clip. I'm sure if it was something innocent they wouldn't have removed the bisexual v-clip. Must have been pretty good to have it deleted.
10:37, so you think Kiefer wanted those girls to make this video and confirm that he is gay or bi, just asking....
Also, I agree with you about the video. Why was it removed? Do you think Kiefer had it removed or do you think these girls got nervous that we were discussing it here?
I can't figure this whole thing out.
Well, all I have to say is TGIF.
The infamous clip was ... what ... about 6 seconds long, and it showed, IMO, a friend helping Kiefer (drunk and probably exhausted) get across the street safely. More importantly, IMO, it also showed the friend exercising good judgment by getting Kiefer the hell away from someone who was videotaping him at something far less than his finest hour(which, again IMO, was a damn good thing, so, as a fan of Kiefer's, I say kudos to the buddy!!!).
I don't think the clip demonstrates bi-sexuality, or homosexuality, or heterosexuality ... or anything sexual. Unfortunately, it shows Kiefer in a poor light, and that's all, so I for one am glad it's no longer available.
We seen Kiefer in a poor light many times before. Many times drunk like at the strip club. Why didn't they remove that video and pics from X17. The only time stars have a video clip removed is when it can do damage to their career. So maybe Kiefer was in a bi-sexual act.
They said on the site here that he was doing the bi-sexual video clip to make fun of his fans. That can be pretty damaging.
I'm sure the video clip wasn't so innocent or it would have stayed.
What was it making fools of his fans or a bisexual video? Maybe both.
Yep, Suzanne. I think you hit the nail on the head. You certainly sound like you have your PR hat on!!
When I saw the video again before it was removed it looked like Florian was pulling Kiefer away. I think part of his job is to protect Kiefer from himself just like with Michael......
While the girls got to enjoy Kiefer's kindness and generosity in that bar and were also permitted to take those silly posed pictures with him, I thought they went to far with the video and I don't think Kiefer was in any condition to figure it all out. I certainly don't think they had his permission.
I guess in the end it was removed because these girls or whoever runs the site thought better of keeping it posted.
We seen Kiefer in a poor light many times before. Many times drunk like at the strip club. Why didn't they remove that video and pics from X17. The only time stars have a video clip removed is when it can do damage to their career. So maybe Kiefer was in a bi-sexual act.
They said on the site here that he was doing the bi-sexual video clip to make fun of his fans. That can be pretty damaging.
I'm sure the video clip wasn't so innocent or it would have stayed.
What was it making fools of his fans or a bisexual video? Maybe both.
October 17, 2008 11:37 AM
Posted by: Anonymous
I think as the poster says above these girls / blog operator thought better of it since it was probably taken without Kiefer's permission and if they know him even casually as is claimed they probably don't want to do damage to that relationship. Wasn't it enough that he paid for their drinks, LOL!!!
To Poster 11:37 AM, don't know if you saw the video but IMHO it doesn't demonstrate either of those things.
Why do you seem so convinced that Kiefer is trying to fool his fans and what exactly is he trying to fool us on. I am a big fan and must be missing something......
To 11:37 ... Yes, I agree that in the past we've seen video of Kiefer that was unflattering. But much has changed as far as his image needs are concerned. I've stated my reasons for this in earlier posts, and received flak for it, but that doesn't make it any less true. Beyond that, his public image was never well served with ITYTKM and the like, but that's just my opinion.
I agree with Linda that sometimes he needs to be protected from himself (as he seems to live too much in the moment, without considering consequences), and that's extremely unfortunate. Cheetah's and the Spotted Pig are examples of this. Given that I don't buy into the theory that he was trying to slag his fans with the pics and video, I'm therefore led to doubt very much that he wanted/expected to be filmed at either place. He was being careless, and he ran into a couple of goofs who exploited his drunkenness. And of course I don't know why the new video was removed, but I don't think it explains a cover-up or conspiracy ... or whatever ... of any description.
Speaking of Linda ... I see you've been taking some flak yourself. Hang in there, and keep fighting for Kiefer's honour. He's worth it!!!!
well, it seems kiefer set up some video clip to make fun of the fans talking about him being bi-sexual on this site. Looks like he had the girls and guys set it up. This must be true or the bisexual tape would not have been deleted. It must have been a good one if everyone is making so much fuss about it.
This is what stars do to their fans once they start bringing in the money.
I didn't think he would but I guess I was wrong.
When he went to jail there were articles implying Kiefer blamed his fans for the DUI.
What kind of honor does Kiefer have. He did everything wrong that a real man of honor wouldn't have done. He isn't Jack Bauer in real life. He is very much removed from that type of person. Do I need to make a list of all the dishonorable things he has done in his life.
So by saying that...I would not put it pass him to dishonor his fans. If the video tape wasn't that bad he should have left it there.
1:00 No. He didn't blame his fans, he blamed the paps. He continued signing autographs for fans, without fail, from what I can tell. And that was the right call for him to have made. Please don't confuse the issue any further by adding incorrect information into the mix.
I agree with Suzanne and Linda and I can't believe that there has been such controversy about that video clip. The clip showed a friend lending a well practised arm to lead Kiefer away ( as others have said ) from what had the potential to be a more embarassing situation ie videoing him while drunk, and hopefully ensuring he got home safely. In a way the clip reminded me a little of the video clip of him drunk taken just before his Dui. Unfortunately on that night he didn't have anyone looking out for him. Whether he should need to have someone looking out for him is a whole other matter but it does appear to be the best option, and I say that with the best of intentions. I have posted a couple of times before under anonymous ( guess the posts lol ) but now I'll be brave and give my name :-)
WHAT THE F..K IS A 41 YEAR OLD MAN DOING WITH A BABYSITTER? NEVER MIND I GET IT!
Does Kiefer realize how much damage fans can do if he is playing his immature games with them.
Does he realize how many none Kiefer websites we can go to and put message onto those site he has been to. TV shows, newspapers, magazines, radio stations, TMZ, talk shows, E ...the list can be amazing. They have people watching their boards all the time waiting to pick up on stories.
Seems to me he disliked people talking about him so he was more then happy to pay the fans back. If it was so innocent he would not of had it removed.
This might be great coverage for 24...it comes free.
kiefer had nothing to do with it!
people have been talking about him for at least twenty years or so, now all of as sudden we are suppose to believe he is getting even with his fans...Get real!
it seems more likely that the girls who posted it suddenly got a conscious. Maybe they were getting a lot of negative responses from from his fans so they removed it. Thats the most logical explanation.
This is getting nowhere. Some people here who are the 'real fans' are defending Kiefer, while others here are insisting that hes playing his fans which for my part is 100% Rubbish.
In any case the subject is just going around in circles.
Really, Kiefer just ran into a couple of "goofs", when one of those "goofs" is a journalist, editor for a magazine and the guy taking the pics & video is a Professional photographer and writer. He and the editor are friends. Kiefer "invited them" to that party along with the other girl.
Don't add incorrect information into the mix especially about them being "goofs". That's insulting! And Kiefer wasn't embarrassed at all as he helped the 2 girls into the taxi. He had plenty of time to stop the video guy.
Kiefer had the video removed because of what it implied and because of the big fuss over it. He got caught by his fans in what he was trying to implied to them. A Bisexual clip.
What do you want Girl Scout points! You were not on this site when it all took place. And don't say I wasn't "A real fans" before this, because I was. Very much so!
Kate, I agree. There's one (or maybe more; I'm not convinced) person here who's gone off the deep end and I really think it's pointless to try to figure out what she's getting at (or they're getting at)... or to try to argue with her (or them).
She's/they're irrational.
Suzanne/Linda/whoever else said this - I agree that it looked like Florian was just getting Kiefer out of there (as friends have done before and will do again). That particular very sweet smile is a dead giveaway that Kiefer's many many sheets to the wind... and I, too, am glad that Florian was there. I do think there's been a bit more attention to making sure that he has someone to "get him out of there" (wherever "there" is) since the DUI, which makes a lot of sense in an obviously PR-related way.
6:20, again I seriously doubt Kiefer had the video removed. It implied nothing unusual and please stop saying without any proof that Kiefer is trying to mislead his fans in any way.
As for the girls and guy, they are goofs. Just cause they are a fashion editor and photographer, so what. Prooves my point even more that this is what these people are. I think the "goof" title is well deserved!!!
Yep, Christy, I think you hit it right. The story keeps changing and the idea that Kiefer was trying to make a bisexual clip to make fun of his funs or whatever reason being applied here is utterly ridiculous.
Btw, upthread a way back the story was that Siobhan was there and she was the one with the video camera. Now suddenly the person with the video camera is a writer and photographer.
Story keeps on changing.....
Do you honestly think a 41 yr old man who has just recently got out of jail, and has a new season of 24 returning to TV after a year off air, not to mention the two hr pilot series '24: Redemtion' and a Gallery exhibition showcasing photos from it opening soon, that he would risk damamging it all for the sake of getting even with a few fans?..I think not.... and what is he suppose to be getting even at?.. people have been commenting on him being bisexual or gay for years.. give it up girl!
6:34- how do you know I was not here before? maybe I was posting under 'anonymous' like you are.
For the record I have been here for a couple of weeks... so there!
Well said 9:04 PM Poster!!!
I might add I don't think fans would think any less of Kiefer if he is gay or bi or straight. No reason for him to play his loyal fans. He's got better things to do and the poster here is correct in stating that people have speculated before about Kiefer's sexuality.
Just aside if his sexuality is an issue it would come from a PR perspective and of course that would fly in the face of him doing what he is being accused of doing.....just saying
These supposed friends took advantage of a clearly drunk and tired Kiefer by taking pictures and video and then rushing to put all of it on their blog. If they were true friends they would have put away the cameras. But they loved all the pics and got lots of hits to their site so it paid off. I suspect Kiefer knows this Editor in passing but I would use the word "friend" loosely......Btw, I take it that if the poster here who is telling us that Kiefer had this video made for our benefit would only have been given this information from these same so-called "friends"....glad Florian was with him!!
Linda Thank you for pointing out that the story keeps changing. your right, first it was Siobhan who was suppose to be filming now its a professional photographer.. wonder whats next.?
I could not agree more with Linda, Suzanne, Ursula and Kate. This idea of Kiefer fooling his fans, especially together with Sib, is just more than ridiculous. We have more than one proof how much Kiefer likes and estimates his fans (just think of the Central-Park golf-cart incidence!) As for me, I do not like it that these girls used Kiefer like and toy and moreover put these pics and the video on the internet. I am very pleased that this video has been removed.
I don't care who is right or wrong about the story, its over.
But it seems strange Christy, Linda, Kate & Hoppel all posting your names around the same time. Some untruths are going on there, OR you wouldn't be "protesting" so much. Especially Linda who must have been on 10 times. Why the big protest if the video wasn't so important. Why remove it? ALL PROTESTING TO TOO MUCH AND ALL AT ONCE...I'm being to believe the other side of the story.
Maybe your one person posting under different names: Grow up!
In my opinion, "Kiefer was drunk" anything could have been possible. The incident is over, but your making it worst. Let it be!
"NONE OF US" were at the bar that night to know what happen and you are protesting to much in my opinion too.
"I can see both sides to this story". The side against Kiefer is putting out alot more info, then the side for him because one thing I do know "Kiefer was partying with those people and having fun". The pics and video prove it. I looked the information up on those people myself and they are professional people not goof's. Why didn't the people "for Kiefer" do the same. Stop being so lazy and look up the info before you open your big mouths.
I'm on both sides of the fence but if the ones "for Kiefer" are not going to put out true info. I will go over the fence.
The same can be said for those 'against Kiefer' They werent there and had no idea what was going on yet they accuse him of deceiving his fans.
so what if they are professional.doesnt mean squat!. Was the video on him all night? wouldnt you think he would have partied with others too?. These girls probably had ten minutes with him and that was at the end of the party when they were all leaving.
The message was meant for both sides. It said, "None of us was at the bar that night". Your making up stories again for the people who are "for Kiefer". You're making us look bad. "You don't know how long the girls were there". Stop!
I cant believe there are people who are buying into this Kiefers 'playing with his fans' crap!
one thing we can all agree on is 'None of us were there'.
but anyhow after Twenty years in the spotlight and years of gossip Kiefer has decided to get back at us! WOW! ...Well, there goes the ratings on 24!
"None of us were there" neither side. Kiefer is not perfect & anything is possible when he is drinking. Enough!
How many times has Kiefer said, "He is in the moment and doesn't think". Just like when he got behind the wheel of a car and drove drunk. This is his problem.
I wasn't on this site when everything happen. I'm not going to judge either side.
Em's right! I made some nasty comments to the people who are on this site. I'm not on this site all the time either, to know what really happen. I know something pretty bad must have happen for all this fuss to occurred. I'm "for Kiefer" but it doesn't make it right for me to judge the others.
I thought the video was funny but to view it again threw their eyes & to go back and read their comments about the gay & bisexual talk going on at the time.
Guess you did have to be here to understand. Its sad but Kiefer was drinking and in the moment.
Sorry, I jumped to conclusions before I opened "my" big mouth. Not judging either side because they have their point of view too.
Janice, my take is that there aren't very many people buying into the "Kiefer's playing with his fans" theory. In fact, I think that there's a really good chance that a lot of the anonymous posters who seem to be agreeing with that theory really are the same poster.
Hoppel, you and I don't agree very often (though we do always agree - and here again - that it's sad to see Kiefer in that helpless state), but I'll bet we can agree to a good laugh at someone thinking that the two of us are the same person! ;) :D
Who said, you were a "real fan" of Kiefer's, Christy. If "you" cared at all about him you would have never stated that Kiefer was...Bisexual.
Your probably the one who started all of this from the beginning. We don't know you but you do like to start fights. Those "anonymous" people could also be you.
Stop begin so Catty! Your making the people that really care "for Kiefer" look bad.
Remember that "everyone" could be laughing at you for starting the Bisexual comments or pointing the finger at you. Were you there? Stop twisting everyone comments around to suit yourself. Enough!
Sorry can't help myself...I'm just dying to know!
Maybe she can tell us who Kiefer prefers the most Siob or Rocco? Maybe together? Any information on that Christy?
6:25pm - I have no idea what Kiefer's sexuality is (something I've said many times before). I just said that it's occurred to me through the years that he *could* be bisexual. If he is (and there's nothing about that most recent sighting that makes me think), I don't care. At all. I think that's a matter of personal preference and don't think that it's a bad thing.
As for anyone being "catty", that would be you... catty, abusive and, frankly, not making much sense.
In other Kiefer news, according to a blog entry (posted on the Krew and in Benny's shout box), he flew to NY yesterday.
Yes, I read this too. It sounded likehe was agitated about something. Hey, maybe he's planning to GO BAUER on the two chicks from Norway. LOL
I wonder if Sib was in LA for fashion week. If she was its strange that he'd come to NY for the weekend.
10:08, why is it strange. We don't even know if they are still together. Afterall, he spent all of last Saturday evening with 2 blonds from Norway; Whether the blonds are friends of his or not, Sib didn't seem to be there!!!
Also, did you notice that from April through June every single trip Kiefer made to NYC he was either pictured or private sighted (gawker or other) with Sib. Now on all the recent trips he has been pictured either alone, with guy friends or hanging in bars with other women. We don't even get private sightings of his.
That doesn't mean they are together or not, I have no idea. I just think it is interesting with this change......
4:15
We don't know that he spent ALL of last Sat night partying without Sib; maybe she was there earlier in the evening and she went home earlier than Kiefer wanted to ... just saying. Also, she was probably in Europe for those fashion shows from mid-Sept to early Oct, so she wouldn't be with him at that time in NY anyway.
But still, Kiefer spent lots of time in NY during that time anyway, and yep, he was sure partying with the gals when that small pic from Sunday showed that Sib was in NY, and she doesn't seem like the "type" to let her man out on a Sat night without her. So ... I have no idea LOL.
For sure, they don't seem to be as close as in the spring, especially since he's been seen with more women since June or so (Darla, Cheetahs, the gal at Dan's subs that people said he met in NY), so there's a change, you're right about that.
We cannot assume anyhow that he is flying to her when he goes to NY. Perhaps he has work to do or is visiting Sarah.
Maybe the goofy girl on the flight to NY was lying, just wanted her moment of fame with everyone checking the site.
If they are still together, she probably wouldn't let her man out of her sight. So its possible she was at the party saturday night with the blonds and must have been involved with the bisexual-video clip.
I wish they would stop doing write ups about 24. By the time your done reading the article you know what the story is all about and what's going to happen. I would like to be "surprise" when it comes out. Like season one of 24. That was the best season ever. In my opinion.
Does anyone agree on the write ups?
I know what you mean, Em... but, as much as is revealed in the publicity, I think that there will be plenty of surprises - both in Redemption and in season 7. There always are! :)
Hi Em, I can agree with you there. I would like to be surprise also. Too many storylines and pics. By the time they release it, there will probably be alot more to come. Season one was a surprise because they didn't release so much info & pics.
Just turn a blind eye when you come across something like I been doing. I was going to watch the "seasons over" to get back into it again, but to busy right now. Its a "must" for me to see S6 before things begin. Can't remember everything, its been so long!
5:15pm & 3:45am...I'm with you on...she doesn't seem like the type to let her man out on a saturday night without her.
I remember the Hot Dog stand pics when Kiefer was drunk at 2 in the morning and there was a woman with him who didn't want her pic taken with him. In my opinion it was probably Siob. It would seem she never wants her pic taken when they are out drinking together, the same could be said if she was at the bar with the 2 blonds last saturday night. Seems to me she doesn't like the camera or spotlight on her when she is in a bad way or drinking too.
If she appears with Kiefer in more pics "soon", then I will be sure she must have been there that night too. I'm not going to go by that single pic of them together the next day on the 12th because they looked like "last years" clothes she had on. I'm sure she can do better then that.
Hey 9:02, it's funny cause a couple of people asked that blogger if Sib was with him and they didn't answer the question. That's why I think those 2 blonds and blogger, etc. were rather strange to me.
I am trying not to judge here but they put all these pictures up including pics of Kiefer looking drunk but then they write a misleading narrative and they don't answer questions. In fact, to me they seemed put off by questions. So why blog then???
To 9:02pm & 6:43am...Everything that happen that night is strange to me, if they did not want the fans to go to their site why wasn't it password safe if it was so private?
I'm going on the assumption that if Kiefer and Siob broke up then she was a part of the pics and video to make Kiefer look bad.
If they are still together then Kiefer was involved in this too. I had my suspicions that someone has be playing with the fans on this site for awhile. It was the beach pics, the rings, and the gay & bisexual things talked about here. If you read above each item someone was there proving everyones opinions were wrong. It was also the fact that Kiefers fans disliked Siob so much. Sometimes people just feel they will never get caught. Like Kiefer with his drinking and driving.
Why can't he just be a single guy who went out partying on a Sat night with his buddy, who happened to be in town doing work with U2, btw. The next day he hooked up with Sib; maybe they were both flying to LA, him to go back to work, and her to attend the fashion events going on that week. The two "goofs" were having 15 minutes of fame at Kiefer's expense. No more, no less. Why is that so hard to believe????
11:19 AM, Could be.....or not!!
No one knows for sure and in the absence of that then people are free to speculate. That's all it is.
To 11:19...
Then people should stop speculating that they are a couple.
The "Goof's" are professional people.
Maybe? Maybe?...Why is it so hard for "You" not to believe? Look up the info yourself.
3:24, what info is there to look up.
We have no proof that Kiefer and Siobhan are still a couple and no proof that there are not. We can't even get an answer from these so called professionals whether or not she was at this bar on Saturday evening.
As for them being professionals, I am not doubting they are professionals in the sense that one is a mag editor and one is a writer, etc. That doesn't mean I can't classify them as "goofs" to describe their behavior and their misleading, as I see it in my eyes, blog narrative. That's all it is.....
The people posting here things they are claiming as fact have no basis in proof as I can see.....so that makes it their opinion and speculation same as me.
Just for everyone's reference for what it is worth, I found a translation of the narrative these women and male friend wrote on their blog along with the Kiefer pictures and video and it starts out "Our new buddy Kiefer....
That doesn't sound like someone they are friends with or hang out with in the usual "circle". I don't know about anyone else but that sounds like someone they just met and made friends with for that particular evening.....
Also, they make it sound as if Kiefer had the bar closed down and everyone thrown out except for Kiefer's entourage. What entourage would that be. From what we could gather, it seemed to be Kiefer and his buddy, Florian and maybe Siobhan (they offer no answer on her presence despite being asked that simple question) plus these 2 women and their male friend. Further, after clarification on their own site it was confirmed that it was closing time and what Kiefer really did was just keep the bar open for them to stay abit longer.
Also, I noticed that when people asked them questions they seem bothered and even asked one person how they found out about the blog......curious!!
3:58 & 7:59 They don't have to answer any bodies questions. Why would they have to? How would you describe their behavior on saturday night and how were they misleading you?
Kiefer invited them to his party and he also had a friend their to control things. Are you implying Kiefers friend fail him? That he wasn't aware of what was going on with the pics and video? Kiefers friend was also there when Kiefer helped the girls into the taxi, you could see his face after you 'slowed" the video down. The guy was rolling the video then but Kiefers friend did not say anything. You hear the girls talking in the video about how much of a tip Kiefer gave them. Kiefers friend had the opportunity at that moment to stop the clip but I didn't hear him "speak a word" of disappoval. Did you?
I also thought at first it was Rocco from behind. If I didn't slow the clip down in "slow motion" I would have never realize who it was with Kiefer.
Did you ever think maybe Kiefer hired them to be there and this is the reason why the girls didn't want to answer any questions? The girls were talking about how much of a tip Kiefer give them. I know it wasn't for the taxi!! Because the one girl said, "how much of a tip did he give "you".
(sigh)... "whatever"..
I thought we wer're done with this.
will put in my two cents and add how they also stole his glasses and he wasnt happy about it... Dont sound'buddy buddy' to me..more like two girls he just met at a bar that night.
You guys (Yes, including me) need to stop the speculation. People (kiefer fans) on other sites are reading here and making a mockery of this site.
Are we also forgetting that he recently mentioned that he was 'single' and at his age 'wants to enjoy good times', which I believe he was doing that night - as he always has done when he goes out drinking.
Gee, okay Liz. (rolls eyes) You may get to dictate what goes on on your own site, bit not here.
Yes,Liz. I'm getting my education here on all of this speculation, about the PR campaign, photo-ops...how PR's stage and pre-arrange things for their stars. That maybe Kiefer was involved in this PR's stuff for his image. That he doesn't like it by goes along with it anyway. How Siob might have been a PR set-up. Very interesting reading material on this site. It's possible Kiefer could be gay! WOW
I'm wondering now, after all this reading whether Kiefer set-up this Bi-video clip and the 2 blonds just to get Siob out of his hair! WOW! Interesting!
Anyone who mocks this site is STUPID! It sure did open my eyes......
11:14, I am with you. I don't like debate and conversation silenced. I think people here understand that they don't know these people involved personally and that we are all just speculating for the most part but Kiefer is a public figure and has left open things about his personal life to be speculated about. Also, in my opinion, given how cagey those two women were about their partying with Kiefer on Saturday night and the posting of those pictures with video also leave lots of room for speculation as does his whole supposed romance with Siobhan......
So I guess my point is that Kiefer invites much of this speculation himself and I think honestly that he wants it that way as it keeps himself relevent. Remember, for a few years prior to 24 people thought he was dead and buried and he didn't like it from what he has said in interviews.
11:14pm - Why is it that you (and others) think that, if Kiefer wanted Siobhan "out of his hair", he couldn't just break it off with her?
6:47am - Regarding this speculation (which I agree should continue if people want to continue it), you do realize that there probably are no more than a couple of handfuls of people worldwide who are participating in this particular speculation, right? No one except that couple of handfuls of people knows about or is even remotely interested in that video or the girls in the bar.
Could Siobhan be part of an actual PR campaign designed to reach more than a few people? Sure. But the blog with the blondes? No.
Kiefer himself said (it was a interview some years ago) that he isn't able to do the break-up, he's the type of man who behaves so bad, so the woman has enough and breaks up! (I assumed you know everything about Kiefer, isn't that what you want to make everyone believe, Christy???)
8:52 He has also said he does not like doing that.
Not to like doing something doesn't mean not to do it...
6:47...A friend who is a big fan of Kiefers showed me the video clip with the 2 blonds. Since I'm not a fan of his she asked me to read the stuff on this site & give her my opinion. I stopped reading things about celebrities when all that stuff with the paps happen to Princess Di. I just want to watch the stars in a movie or on TV & not know about their personal lifes. I know Di was so much bigger then Kiefer. She used the media so she also left the door open for them to speculate about her personal life. I'm afraid celebrities can't have it both ways.
Kiefer is no Di "he has to put himself out their" like you said, to grab the attention of his fans to give them something to talk about. What can he do to grab their attention? Why a NEW woman for the "female fans" to get jealous over/fight over or him out drinking so the female fans will feel sorry for him. Liz's said this site is a mockery. Well, I stopped off at her site and they were doing the same thing. Talking about no PDA with this woman. In my opinion the "female fans" of Kiefers just want to "kill off" every woman who comes into his life even the 2 blonds. Gee, how sad is that! He is using you & the media for attention, they are Pro's & you are amateur's falling into their trap. If you don't want to hear speculation on whether he is gay (this is possible) & mess up that image you have in your head about him then "don't" go to the sites or read all the bull shit, like I do. A star shouldn't be "your fantasy"! Go out & find the real thing.
9:19, so why are you here or visiting other sites if you are above talking about celebrities??????
Enjoy your life since you have one and we don't. Don't you think that is rather presumptious of you to assume that about people you don't even know. Don't you think it is rather small of you to lecture people you don't even know.
We're permitted to speculate and talk about these celebrities who put themselves out there. Doesn't mean it's life or death or anything more than that. Just discussion. If you think it is silly then please don't participate. Just doesn't make sense to do that other than to make yourself feel superior......
8:52..I heard the same thing. Maybe Christy missed it. It would seem Christy that you're speculating about Kiefers "Handful of Fans" again.
For the video and the 2 blonds NOT to be on everyones website or in the papers it sure is recieving its fair share of speculation and making the rounds. You must remember Benny had the link on the BB site but he dictates what is allow to be talked about on that site the same as others. If it was all about nothing, just Kiefer drunk with 2 cute blonds why the big hush up? Why remove the video? We have seen Kiefer worst then that! Maybe it wasn't good for his image? Why was he tipping the girl? Everyone can see that something is wrong with this picture.
After that big "write up" that PR Suzanne and Linda were talking about, that Siob is just a staged Photo-ops maybe this is Kiefers way of pushing her out the door. What is a better way to do it then to be flirting with 2 other women.
I'm also starting to believe Kiefer uses his drinking problems as a excuse to cover up his nastiness.
9:19am...I agree if this speculation is messing up the image you have of Kiefer in your head then don't read anything on the sites to change that image you have of him. All of this might just be speculation but it also can be true.
9:46...My point exactly! Your obsess with just your own opinions and speculations. You don't have a open mind when it comes to others. Now who is the one acting "superior".......
Sorry, if I'm taking your obsessive fantasy away from you!
11:21, Did you even read my post? I am not sure what you are talking about but I am open to hearing all opinions and speculation. That was my point. I am not in favor of any individuals telling me or others they can't speculate.
Perhaps you misunderstood my posting, not sure but I certainly wasn't opposed to hearing all analysis. I find it interesting!!
10:30, Kiefer was not tipping the ladies, he was tipping the waiter(s). I believe they mention $2,000.00; just look at a closeup of the bill and you'll see Kiefer writing down the tip....
The girls in the "video" didn't ask how much the waiters tips came to. The one girl asked in the "video", what did he give "you" for a tip?
Kiefer hired them probably to have the pics and video taken and put on their website for fans to talk about. Which everyone did, even us! Since some fan "believed" it looked more like a bi-sexual video they had it pulled.
The pics & video were made for a Norwegian Site. People from Norway come to "their site" to find out what's going on in NYC and "their site" puts up the Stars they meet. This site is not meant for Americans but someone found it and spread the word. On purpose? Who Knows!
I guess you can say Kiefer got caught paying and staging a Photo-ops for Norway. Not everyone wants to see Kiefer with a girlfriend they much rather see a drunken Kiefer and one having fun. Its showed the female fans in Norway that he is single and having fun just like the article said.
Just my opinion!
BTW...they could have pulled the video because of the girls talking about the tip they got...
8:52 & 10:30 - yeah, I know that Kiefer doesn't like to break-up with people. That said, he's a big boy. My question is why do you feel so sorry for "poor Kiefer being saddled with this woman he doesn't want" rather than thinking "why can't a grown man break up with someone if he wants to do it?"
Unlike you, I don't claim to know what he thinks/feels about her... or she about him... or the two of them about each other... but, if I thought that he didn't want anything to do with her and just didn't have the balls - at 41 years old - to say, "this needs to end," it wouldn't be her I'd be disgusted with; it'd be him.
Also, I didn't say that Kiefer has a "handful of fans". Kiefer has a lot of fans. But it's only a handful of fans who have seen and/or care one way or another about this video.
5:33 & 5:39 - Gve it a break!
Geez Louise!... Cant the poor guy go out on the town for a drink anymore without people speculating!
What! You never speculated about Kiefers life before? Did you go to Liz site and ask them to stop speculating about Kiefer never giving any of his girlfriends any PDA. Or Benny's site where they are on a mission to hunt Kiefer down. Can't they just leave the "poor guy" alone.
Has it ever occur to them he might be gay and that is the reason for NO PDA with women...Maybe he would like to be left alone for one weekend without being hunted down...Give it a break...Leave the "poor man" alone.
Has anyone ever discussed his music or 24 in depth. Something he is really proud of. They are not his "real fans" either. Kiefer would be ashame they are discussing his lovelife, his drinking problems and hunting him down like some animal for their pleasure.
Then you attack the people who would like to discuss the video clip that was pulled. What's the big deal?...Give it a break!
some people's grip on reality is getting rather tenous.
7:56...I hope you realize that Benny's site is rated PG-13 they willn't put anything rated R on that site. They call Kiefer's chest hair, fur. They treat him like his their pet instead of a man. At one point they never showed Kiefer with another women on the site. Just pics of Kiefer. Benny will hush them like children.
Penny Keating site is the best if you want reality. She paints who the real Kiefer is, whether its good or bad. She is honest and I think Kiefer likes that. She gives her fans a sense of who he is. I hope she will continue to do this for the adults who wish to see the real Kiefer. She probably would have gotten the pics and video from the Norway girls if some other people didn't jump on them by asking lots of personal questions. Since they wouldn't response to all their questions, those people decided to call them childish nasty names like goof's, silly etc:. I can't blame the Norway girls for backing away. In my opinion it was the 3 or 4 immature people at Benny's site. They couldn't bad mouth the girls on Benny's site so they came here to do their nasty work. Same as Liz site did. The Norway girls got a bad rap just because they were having fun with Kiefer and got to meet him. Like someone said, they are out to kill all the girls who are with Kiefer. They want to think of him only as their fantasy. Not as a "man" who likes to "drink", have "fun" and be with other "women" or "men" or "both".
If you don't like who Kiefer really is, how can you call yourself his fan? He only wants to hide from people like you!
7:21
Can not agree with you more. Benny's girls were on the Norway girls website, I seen their names. Couldn't get what they were after so they bad mouth them here. Guess Benny will be mad that his girls betrayed the BBsite. They aren't allow to talk about this stuff. Now, I know why they wanted the video comments to stop! Why they were making up ridiculous stories about the 2 blonds and tried to twist the girls story around. Can't blame Kiefer if he runs and hides from his fans.
btw...Did they also make up the story about the bi-sexual video clip, so it would be removed?
He is great in 24. Can't the guy just have some fun & have a life by keeping it real?? He tries to keep it honest & real that's what I like the best about him. He doesn't sugar coat everything...C:
IMO the bunch of people on Benny's site, who are desperately clinging to the wishful thinking that Sib is Kiefer's love of his life, wanted to have confirmed from the Norwegian girls that Sib was in the Spotted Pig, too. As for Kiefer never showing any PDA with his girlfriends: how about the kissing and hugging with Cathérine and the PDAs with Julia?
11.28, i don't understand why some people still think there was Siobhan in the Spotted Pig, i don't think she was "hiding" and we don't even see her in the video. I don't say she's not with him anymore but nothing says she was there that night and if she had been there the 2 women would have behaved in an other way LOL and Kiefer too...
7.21PM and 8.37 PM who will never give a name. Yes I asked the girls on the Norwegian site what I thought was a reasonable question ( they did have a comment section ) and thanked them for their answer and answered their follow up questions. I have not left any comments about them being "goofs" or anything else. Simply because you think something does not make it true. I was reluctant to answer because I don't want to encourage you further but your comments about Benny's site are simply silly and nasty. Benny's site tries to be humorous and informative a perspective that seems to be lost on some people. ursula.
lol,I put my name in the wrong place , that last post was me
I personally was glad that the Norwegian girls put up the pics and video of Kiefer (which btw, I saw nothing curious about; it was a friend holding onto a drunk Kiefer so he wouldn't fall down).
I think those girls made themselves look silly by acting so suspicious of people just asking questions. I wanted to know if Sib was there cause I think she is bad for Kiefer and quite frankly I was glad he went out that night without her and hung with those girls. But they wouldn't even answer questions if she was there.
I think those girls just got paranoid or something or too sensitive. Those pics and video were fine and those girls were just having fun so why act like you did something wrong....That isn't Benny's fault
Hey Ursula, I saw you commented so just wanted to respond. I agree with you about Benny's site. I personally don't agree with her decisions on this whole matter but it is her site just as those Norwegian girls control their site and refused to answer innocent questions and got scared and removed that video. Just as the posters mentioned there are other sites like Penny's where people can go. There are enough Kiefer sites to fit everyone's needs....
As for the video, I still don't get why the girls removed it. It was a harmless video and just cause one or two people here drew their own conclusions to it doesn't mean that everyone else did.
I thought the girls acted goofy with regards to how they handled the postings. As for their fun with Kiefer, good for them!!
8:40, though it's hard to keep all the "anonymouses" apart, thanks for confirming that it was people who don't like Siobhan (not those who have nothing against her) who were theorizing that she was there.
To ursula and Linda - totally agree that Benny has every right to determine the rules on her own board. As does Liz. As does everyone. As Linda says, there are boards to suit every Kiefer fan's desires. Those who want to vilify Siobhan have a happy home at Kiefer's Place. And people who feel all different ways have been posting on this thread (which is great... viva la difference! :) ).
My personal thoughts about the subject is that Kiefer partied with the Norweigian girls, they posted the pics and video and then they acted kinda snotty when they were asked perfectly reasonable (given that they were the ones who posted it) questions about the evening. Oh well... sometimes people are snotty. As for removing the video, I don't know why they did, but what's left is a still of Kiefer and Florian walking away so I hardly think they removed it to quell "speculation" about them walking away. I mean, really. I don't think there's any more to that evening that what is seems. They had fun with Kiefer. They posted pics. They acted weird when asked about them. Big whoop. ;) :)
testing ...
Ursula aren't you being brave by posting your name again. What have you stated before where you couldn't be brave? This is a quote Ursula that Suzanne wrote and "You ageed to it": He was being careless and he ran into a couple of "goof's" who exploited his drunkeness.
Believe me Ursula, BB site is not lost on me. Why are you on this site when you like Benny site so much? Why didn't you state your comments there instead on here if her site is so informative and honest?
The name calling is just going on and on Ursula...goof's,silly girls, now 2 more nasty names snotty and weird. They have a right to their own website. The question everyone wanted to know...Was Siob there? Maybe the girls didn't want to get caught up in all the speculation over Kiefer and Siob. How unreasonably was that? The fans at BB can trash these girls but BB doesn't like the trash thrown back.
Let me ask you this question Ursula. "Did Kiefer" ever "officially" tell anyone, the paper, media, fan site etc: that Siob was his girlfriend?
NO ONE should speculate or assume on anything about Kiefer if you are a fan "unless he states" something as a "FACT".
BTW...A quote of Christy's: It was sad to see Kiefer in that helpless state.
Her comment now: They had fun with Kiefer.
Linda's quote: The suppose friends took advantage of a clearly drunk & tired Kiefer and rushed to put the pics & video on their blog. Just to get lots of hits on their site.
Comment now: Well you can read it for yourself at 8:50AM.
He only wants to hide from people like you! From 7:21PM Jo
Ursula aren't you being brave by posting your name again. What have you stated before where you couldn't be brave? This is a quote Ursula that Suzanne wrote and "You ageed to it": He was being careless and he ran into a couple of "goof's" who exploited his drunkeness.
Believe me Ursula, BB site is not lost on me. Why are you on this site when you like Benny site so much? Why didn't you state your comments there instead on here if her site is so informative and honest?
The name calling is just going on and on Ursula...goof's,silly girls, now 2 more nasty names snotty and weird. They have a right to their own website. The question everyone wanted to know...Was Siob there? Maybe the girls didn't want to get caught up in all the speculation over Kiefer and Siob. How unreasonably was that? The fans at BB can trash these girls but BB doesn't like the trash thrown back.
Let me ask you this question Ursula. "Did Kiefer" ever "officially" tell anyone, the paper, media, fan site etc: that Siob was his girlfriend?
NO ONE should speculate or assume on anything about Kiefer if you are a fan "unless he states" something as a "FACT".
BTW...A quote of Christy's: It was sad to see Kiefer in that helpless state.
Her comment now: They had fun with Kiefer.
Linda's quote: The suppose friends took advantage of a clearly drunk & tired Kiefer and rushed to put the pics & video on their blog. Just to get lots of hits on their site.
Comment now: Well you can read it for yourself at 8:50AM.
He only wants to hide from people like you! From 7:21PM Jo
There's nothing remotely contradictory about saying that one thinks that Kiefer's situation in those pics is sad and that the girls certainly seemed to have fun.
That was so BRAVE of you Christy to post a comment here on how snotty and weird the 2 girls were but not BRAVE enough to post your comments on their website or BB site. The same can be said for the rest of Benny's handful of Fans who like to put Kiefer under a microscope and make comments on his body parts or even his tongue when he licks his lips.
How would you like to be under that microscope where people Zoom in and Zoom out on you all day long!
You just don't want anyone to know that it was Benny's handful of nasty fans speculating and making those nasty comments. So you come here to get in your pound of flesh. So Brave and Immature!
Those "handful of nasty fans" are giving Benny's website a "bad name" and its why Kiefer likes to "hide" from people like you!
Jo
Earth to Jo... Earth to Jo... I said that the responses on the website were kind of snotty, which they were. I didn't post on that site at all but, if I had, and if the person responding there had been snotty to me, I probably would've said something... or shrugged my shoulders and let it go. Since, like I said up-thread here, sometimes people are snotty. Not a big deal.
Other than that, I said (and thought) nothing about those girls. I don't think there was any Big Conspiracy about those pics and that video. I think it's just what it looked like... Kiefer drunk, fans having their fun with him, a friend getting him home (eventually).
It's hilarious to me that you're pegging the people who enjoy Benny's site as "nasty." Because they don't want to spend their days slagging a woman they don't know? Yeah, that's really nasty alright.
... and are you really so incredibly self-involved that you think that, if *you're* not seeing Kiefer, he's hiding? Just because he's been living his life without being sighted or photographed for the last few weeks, it doesn't mean he's "hiding." Silly, silly.
Kiefer "hiding" from his fans, really???? Let me get this straight, first he is making fun of his fans by putting together a harmless video and now he is hiding from them??? Wow, I never knew. I always thought Kiefer appreciated us. How silly of me!!
As for him hiding, that's funny, I just assumed he was finishing up filming 24....lol
btw, not that I have to explain myself but some on this board claimed that these 2 girls were friends of Kiefer's. Under that assumption I stick by my story that they took advantage of Kiefer and abused their friendship with him.
I have since come to believe that it is not the case that they are friends at all just a couple of girls who met him at the bar and in that instance they seemed to act just as other fans have acted and enjoyed his company.
However, I agree with Christy. Call it snotty or whatever you want but they were certainly put off when very innocent questions were asked. If they didn't want questions then they shouldn't have opened up their boards....In that regard they acted like unprofessional goofs who just happen to operate a blog - they should shut it down....some of the posters here seem to have something vested in them, however for whatever reason.....
As for the poster stating that we shouldn't speculate about Kiefer until he announces something as FACT, don't hold your breath too long.
Kiefer doesn't make pronouncements about his personal life. If you are a long time fan you would know that...maybe you are fairly new to the fandom, or NOT.
As for speculating, once again people can speculate all they want. That is what fans do and everything they discuss about him on fansites will most likely be speculation since we don't know him personally.
Please stop acting like his personal PR person or bodyguard as much as you may want to believe that you are.....
It looks like someone hit a home run and it wasn't the BB team.
She was talking about Kiefer hiding from opinionated obscene fans like you.
Just for fun, can you define what you mean by "hiding" in this context, 8:14pm?
I think it is truely amazing how Jo figured it all out. I didn't connect the names at BB site, the 2 Norway girls site and this one.
I know the BB site and they are not allow to speculate there. She will said, Now Ladies, we willn't talk about that. Hush!
This is so funny that they come here to speculate about Kiefer's girlfriends, his drinking problems, Christy saying he might be bisexual etc:. OMG!
And they have the nerve to call the other 2 blond girls comments snotty, silly, weird and not important. They made the story up about the bisexual clip because they were jealous the 2 blonds got to meet Kiefer. They probably emailed the girls to get the clip removed and calling it too bisexual for fans to see. OMG
Kiefer did that clip and video for his Norway fans and BB interfered in Kiefer's personal life because of them being jealous. It all seems to connect. They are very silly nosey fans.
Kiefer would probably love to put their silly heads on a block and chop them off.
Your right Penny's site would never lower herself to this level of silliness...Ann
Earth to Jo...I would think that kind of spiteful comment went out in grade school. It would seem that the spitefulness comes out even more when someone is totally right!
The 2 "younger" women were partying and drinking too but yet they were the ones to take advantage of the "HARD" partying Kiefer and his friend who are I hope fully grown MEN. Hilarious!
Their answers to the questions weren't snotty at all. I'm afraid it was the other way around with the BB girls asking snotty personal questions about whether Siob was there at the bar while pretending to be interested in Kiefer. They even corrected the comments about Kiefer closing the bar down just for his party.
We can see through your spitefulness and jealousy and why you didn't like their answers especially when they didn't answer whether Siob was there or not. It showed in my opinion just how much they respect Kiefer's privately. It shows just how little BB fans understand Kiefer. He doesn't care if people talk about him but he doesn't like other people talking about someone who was not involve in the mix.
If it wasn't that important why the name calling? It would seem they were the professional ones and BB group were very snotty unprofessional immature silly goof's who just didn't get their way. You looked like low-lifes. I wish Penny would have handled the situation with her professional wisdom. She would never have judged them or their privately and handled it with tact.
9:16 AM, those girls made it seem in their narrative that Kiefer closed down the bar and had the customers chased out just for them; that was misleading and I am not saying on purpose maybe there was a language barrier or maybe they just weren't clear by mistake but it was misleading nevertheless. At any rate they did clear up the issue when a poster asked about that specific statement. You as a fan should understand why people would want that cleared up. Do you want to know as a Kiefer fan that he would have people thrown out of a bar or anywhere just for his comfort???? I think that makes him seem out of touch to me. Maybe you couldn't care less and that's up to you but it bothered me and I am glad they clarified.
As for posters asking those ladies about Siobhan, it is just as likely that people who don't like Siobhan asked if she was there as it is people who do like her. I am not sure how anyone is drawing a distinction either way.
Sounds like you just have a grudge against Benny and her site and don't really care what anyone has to say.
We can see through your spitefulness and jealousy and why you didn't like their answers especially when they didn't answer whether Siob was there or not. It showed in my opinion just how much they respect Kiefer's privately. It shows just how little BB fans understand Kiefer. He doesn't care if people talk about him but he doesn't like other people talking about someone who was not involve in the mix. Posted by Anonymous at 9:16 AM.
Sounds like you're a Sib fan so why so angry at Benny?? She has been very kind to Sib. So don't take things out on her and her ladies; they are fans too!!
OK I'm so confused as to why many of you think that Siobhan and Kiefer are together when he has said he is single! We have not seen any new pictures for ages! If he is hiding from anyone it's more likely to be Siobhan than the fans, after the way she behaves when the photographers are around.As for those blonde girls I agree with Christy and Linda, I thought they were snotty and used him to their advantage. Why put the pictures out there and not expect to be questioned?? They have had their five minutes of fame and took advantage of Kiefers good nature so let them just disappear now, afterall they are nothing special to him. JMHO
OK I'm so confused as to why many of you think that Siobhan and Kiefer are together when he has said he is single! We have not seen any new pictures for ages! If he is hiding from anyone it's more likely to be Siobhan than the fans, after the way she behaves when the photographers are around.As for those blonde girls I agree with Christy and Linda, I thought they were snotty and used him to their advantage. Why put the pictures out there and not expect to be questioned?? They have had their five minutes of fame and took advantage of Kiefers good nature so let them just disappear now, afterall they are nothing special to him. JMHO
Hi Natalie. Speaking for myself, I have no idea whether Kiefer and Siobhan are "together" or what their relationship ever has been. But the last photo we saw of him was of the two of them together (I know that some people don't think that photo really was taken on October 12th and maybe it wasn't; but, jmo, I think it was) so, as of the last time we saw Kiefer, they still were hanging out together... in whatever fashion.
I don't think we have any evidence at all that he's "hiding" from anyone. He just hasn't been sighted (by anyone who's posted about it, that is) or photographed in a couple of weeks. That doesn't mean he's hiding. It just means that he's getting on with his life without, for the moment, having been spotted. It happens. :)
Hi Christy, I agree. I think that he has just been very busy with 24 schedule.
I agree Natalie, if Siob and Kiefer aren't together and he is "single" like he said and wants to "just have fun", why did some of Benny's fans ask whether Siob was there at the bar that night? It "was not" the girls who answered the questions to the comments in the first place but "the guy" who wrote the story and had his email there. So I'm very confused why the girls got the bad rap!!!
Why is it "no one" listens to Kiefer, not even his "suppose fans" about him being single and just wants to have fun.
The pic from the 12th is probably old, they add old pics all the time to the site. It would seem to me someone is more then wishing for them to be together. The fans need to "listen to Kiefer" and what he says not to some fans who wish for something else. They are the ones confused and trying to confuse others.
I stand with Kiefer and only listen to him not what others speculate about. If those girls were silly, goof's or trying to take of advantage of him which I disagee with, he would not have spent 4 to 5 hours with them having fun and enjoying himself and putting them in a taxi when they needed to leave with a big smile on his face. I sure do "envy" the 2 Norway girls and how they kept Kiefer entertained that night. Lucky Them!!!
I agree Natalie, if Siob and Kiefer aren't together and he is "single" like he said and wants to "just have fun", why did some of Benny's fans ask whether Siob was there at the bar that night? It "was not" the girls who answered the questions to the comments in the first place but "the guy" who wrote the story and had his email there. So I'm very confused why the girls got the bad rap!!!
Why is it "no one" listens to Kiefer, not even his "suppose fans" about him being single and just wants to have fun.
The pic from the 12th is probably old, they add old pics all the time to the site. It would seem to me someone is more then wishing for them to be together. The fans need to "listen to Kiefer" and what he says not to some fans who wish for something else. They are the ones confused and trying to confuse others.
I stand with Kiefer and only listen to him not what others speculate about. If those girls were silly, goof's or trying to take of advantage of him which I disagee with, he would not have spent 4 to 5 hours with them having fun and enjoying himself and putting them in a taxi when they needed to leave with a big smile on his face. I sure do "envy" the 2 Norway girls and how they kept Kiefer entertained that night. Lucky Them!!!
A friend wanted to see the pics with the Norwegian girls, so I took a second look at them with her. She noticed that the main pic with the long-haired blonde on the left and the short-haired blond on the right, with Kiefer in the middle holding the flowers .. it looks like the long-haired blonde might be photo-shopped into that pic??? Look at the top of her head. Doesn't it seem strange? Just wondering what other people think about that.
It doesn't look strange to me, but what is the difference she was there. The tall blonde Randi has her "hand" on Kiefers shoulder where the long hair blond is standing with her head laying on Kiefers shoulder and maybe her hand is throwing you off. The girl with the long blond hair is very pretty. The pics were very playful.
Maybe your printer is off if you did print the pics. I don't know. The pic looks fine to me.
Yes at 9:04... they were 2 very lucky girls! I wish I wish I was there!
Wish I was there too but I wouldn't be able to drink for 4 to 5 hrs. One drink for me and I would be under the table. Kiefer would have to carry me home which I would love of course but then I wonder who would be carrying us both home.
Love to dance and party but can't drink. Guess that's a good thing!
I wonder if Kiefer is dating one of the girls?
PHILLIES ARE THE CHAMPS!!! KIEFER WAS IN THE COMMERCIALS FOR 24. WAY TO GO PHILLIES AND KIEFER!!!
I didn't see anything strange with that pic either when I went back to look but I was surprise that the pic in the video stopped where the guy looked like Rocco and Kiefer arm in arm. I thought they removed the video completely. It was just strange to see that left there. It looked like the person who removed it said, "ok we will remove the video but not that part". Can't figure out why they would do that!
I thought the pics were playful too but have know idea why they were not posted on any of Kiefer's fan sites. They usually post all his pics.
They didn't post those pics because most of the fan sites think Kiefer can do no wrong and he wasn't pictured in the best light, (drunk after his 4th DUI) doesn't look good, and they don't want to admit anything bad about the great one/
to the person who think that kiefer doesn't go on leno because of a joke about gay, kiefer is going to be on leno.
12:09
I can agree to that about the fan sites even though I like Kiefer alot. He is who he is, why sugar coat it, he doesn't!
8:37
They were talking about the joke Leno made when rumors were going around about Kiefer in gay bars and kissing a guy etc: No one said, Kiefer would not go back on his show because of that comment or would not be invited back on the show again.I really can't wait for more interviews again with Kiefer and to hear about 24.
I like Kiefer no matter who he is whether he is a drunk? or gay?. He is great in 24. I love that show! I'm not about to marry the guy so what do I care what is does in his personal life. Just my opinion!
I'm pretty sure the pics were not posted on the other fan sites because those girls are going to make an english blog themselves and they were not too keen for them to be posted out by others, thats the impression I got but I could be wrong of course.
That could be true Natalie, but I do know that there are some blogs that will post nothing even remotely questionable about Kiefer and I think it is kind of sad, it is like they are delusional about him, of corse, they won't ever admit that. and it you post something questionable they will take it off or ban you. can you say La La land?
Hello...Don't forget that site was "translated" for us.It is a site for Norway! The 2 Norway girls did not post the pics or write the comments. It was done by the photographer who is the website administer and writer. That site is for the people "in Norway" who want to hear things about NYC. It is not just about Kiefer.
Benny's fans were the ones to screw up on this. They interpreted everything wrong as usual. They blamed the girls and called them goof's. This is probably why they didn't want anyone to post their pics. I can't blame them. Benny's fans are the goof's for that screw up. BIG KNOW IT ALLS!
So Please stop blaming "the girls".
And I agree with you 7:49 AM. I believe the sites might be done by Kiefer's PR"S. I will say it again! Why sugar coat everything, we know who Kiefer is and I like him anyway.
Kiefer said he's single and wants to enjoy the good times. That's what he's doing, with the Norway girls and others, if the reports are true. And there was Cheetahs when Sib was in LA, so what does that say about them. He's dating her also, and why not. He's been really honest about himself and what he wants or doesn't want from women/relationships, which is just to date and have fun, I think, so let's not get mad at him, or them, or anybody else ... just my opinion.
Helen
Hey, I just noticed that recent pics of Kiefer with Sib are being handed out on a regular monthly installment basis, as in August 6/10, Sep 11/13, and then that small pic Oct 12. Hmmm ... seems a bit suspicious, but maybe not. but it might mean that we'll see her/them in the middle of Nov. when Kiefer's in NY to promote Redemption. *Fingers crossed for seeing him sooner, and alone, LOL*
Kiefers been at a couple of recent public events without Sib, so who knows whats going on between them. ..Maybe when he said he was single he really meant it!
Having said that Im sure she will pop up now..she always does just when you think shes out the picture..
LOL, yep, I agree that she does seem to turn up, just when you think the relationship has run its course. She'll probably make an appearance when Kiefer is in NY next week to promote Redemption, especially if the PR people are right and she's part of his new image now!! It's interesting that she seems to pop up on a monthly basis, as Nov 6, 11:06 pointed out. Hmmm ... is right.
Sure is interesting that she keeps showing up regularly, like clock work. I for one am not looking forward to seeing her smirking at the camera, and playing up to photogs, next week, which I agree she probably will be. This one really turns me off! Oh well. Love Kiefer, tho. Cheers.
Kiefer is single, but yea she turns me off too! Its like she spy's on this site until someone claims they are "no" longer together and pops up like a bad odor in a crowd. If she cared that much, why wasn't she at Kiefer's "special" photo of Aficia event? Strange!
It looked like another girl was standing with him in those photos! Maybe?
It would seem Kiefer doesn't like her hanging out with his group of friends from 24. Maybe he doesn't trust her enough around the secret's of the 24 show.
I'm sure she had the time to attend the African Photo event. In my opinion it was something special Kiefer did and she was not there to support him. It just goes to show you how much they care about one another. I sure as hell would like to have been there! She is a ass!
Or maybe Kiefer didn't want her there after all. HEHEHE!
I agree with you all about her not being at the photo event. Seemed strange unless they have pulled back from one another and are just friends or see each other only in NY or neither. I thought that lady with the black bag was with Kiefer at first too but I think she was just in the background and really could have been with someone else cause Kiefer really isn't looking towards her and she doesn't appear in the pics from the reception portion. He seems to mostly be with Evelyn, his PR lady and I think Sue, his agent is there as well.
We might get some indication of where Kiefer and Siobhan are when he does the premiere event next Wednesday. That would most certainly seem like something she would attend with him although maybe not walk the red carpet with him.
At any rate I am just glad to get new pics of him. In the TV Guide he is quoted as saying he is very happy now with great things happening to him and where things are going. Whether or not that includes a serious relationship with Siobhan or someone else is not clear to me but I imagine he is mostly referring to all the rave reviews on 24, his record label business going well and his new home purchase.
As always all guesses on my part, lol
I wondered about the woman in the background of a number of the pics from the African photo exhibit, too. Could have been with Kiefer, or with somebody else. It's really unclear. I also don't relish the idea of seeing Sib next week. What is it about her that makes me suspicious of her? I can't really understand it, but I'm usually right when I get funny feelings about people. I don't like to be mean, but she turns me off, totally. She looks "wrong" with Kiefer, somehow, and she has a sort of untrustworthiness about her that I can't quite put my finger on. I'm glad to have found a few people who feel the the same way about her. LOL
The woman in the background in the photos is Evelyn. Look back on almost any event over the last seven years and you'll find her. Easiest to check is probably ComicCon.
Evelyn is there, but people are talking about someone else, at one point Evelyn is even talking to her also. The woman in question is standing against the wall, on the red carpet and doesn't move. She looks much like Evelyn, but it's somebody else.
I am very curious, too, if Sib will cling to Kiefer next Wednesday in NY. If he shows up on his own, this would be a very good sign. Anyhow, he looked so good and dapper at the Paley-event, that my first thought was: "Well, good for him to have been withouth her for a while. "
are you sure Sib was not with Kiefer at the exhibit ? One fan, on Penny site, says she was...
Yes, and this "fan" gave a link to a picture as proof - and nowhere is any sign of Sib! Don't know what's the matter with this "fan" - must have a big imagination....
We weren't talking about Evelyn in the pics. Of course we have seen her in many pics and TV events with Kiefer. It was another lady standing near the wall with Kiefer and I think I have seen her before too but can't remember where or when. She might have been with Kiefer because I didn't see her standing anywhere near someone else except Kiefer and Evelyn.
Did not see Sib in the pics either and I enlarged it and didn't see her. She would have been near Kiefer anyway to be in the spotlight of course.
Since she wasn't there at that "special event" for him I would think that he isn't serious at all about her even IF he does see she in NYC this week I'm sure it is nothing. It never was in my opinion!
I also think he might have spent some time with Kelly and her boys, since their dad died. He is very close to them! He said in the TV guide he would like to throw his kid"s" computers away, I'm sure he didn't mean his adult children. Maybe that is where he has been hiding out. God bless them anyway!
Apparently Sib is still Kiefer's "girlfriend" at least for the NY media. In a new issue of Men\s Vogue they ask him about her as his girlfriend, and he answers questions. Kinda too bad, because i thought he said he was "single" and happy that way. He's certainly been acting like he doesn't have a girlfriend. Oh well. I guess I don't get this relationship ... never have. It's always seemed funny to me anyway.
Jane, i agree with you when you say "he's certainly acting like he doesn't have a girlfriend"...I understand he wants to have a private life but to say he's single whereas Sib is with him is very strange.
They do the interviews for the mags months ahead of time and Kiefer is only going to say the same thing in Men's Vogue "that he is single and having fun!" He said, he doesn't wish to commit to a story on a girlfriend because he doesn't know how long it will last, then he has to answer questions on why they split up. He doesn't like doing that. You wait and see and I will be right! You must not know Kiefer that well if you would think anything different with him. He has only ever talked about Julia, his 1st wife and Kelly that I can remember. He is not committed to Siob, that is why he will not answer their questions. It's just to sell mags and we all already know about Kiefers and her relationship. ZIP!!
2:08pm...Can't agree more...ZIP!!! He has been to bars, events and no pics of them together like before. No sightings of him flying in and out of NY or LA for weekend visits. That African Photo event was important in my opinion and no show from her. No "commitment" when a guy does what Kiefer does with partying, drinking and seeing other women still. He is not committing himself to her at all. There willn't be anything in that mag worth reading about her.
He will most likely get drunk again after he promotes 24 like he did with Mirrors and have some fun!
I'm sorry if I offended you 2:08.
I didn't mean to. I guess I was too literal in interpreting what the newspaper hinted is going to be in the magazine. You're right; I forgot that he also said he will "shut up" about his love life. You make a lot of sense, so thanks very much for the clarification. I should have more faith in our guy. LOL And, you know a lot better than I do about how newspapers sell to the public, so thanks for that, also.
I don't know. Just read an artcle by Contact Music that Kiefer is moving to NY because his relationship with Sib is "blossoming" and he's tired of jetting back and forth btween NY and LA. Would they make that up????? He must have said something like that or they wouldn't have printed it.
strange to shut up and suddenly tells something like that to a journalist.
I'm very curious to read this interview, maybe he decided to talk about this relationship, who knows ? EVERYBODY CAN CHANGE HIS OPINION EVEN KIEFER.
That line goes back months when the National enquirer or Star first printed it in back in May.
Another source says Kiefer is moving permantly to NY after 24 ends and that could still be a couple of years away.
If the relationship is 'blossoming' then why wasnt she at the exhibit?..
Lets wait to see if Sib appears with Kiefer while he is in NY promoting 24
(I think she will)
Then we will Know if he's still with her.
Also I think his move to NY is for many reasons. For one, his Daughter lives in NY, so maybe he wants to be closer to her too.
I agree that he wont make a permanant move to NY till after he's finished with 24. If he did move before then, then he would be jetting to LA from NY all the time!
I think all the internet gossipers have jumped onto something that makes for great gossip as soon as he they heard he was planning a move to NY.
They all started the marriage rumours and we know that turned out to be untrue.
For now just another rumour doing the rounds on the internet.
Jane your comment didn't offend me at all. It was just a reminder about what Kiefer has said in the past about his personal life (that he willn't talk about his girlfriends). Your right...we should have more faith in our guy. And I do!
Contact music just quotes things from other articles. They didn't interview Kiefer on a personal level themselves.
I heard but I'm not sure that Men's Vogue Mag. willn't be around anymore. They aren't taking any new subscriptions like 24 mag. did. Alot of mags and "stores" are in trouble and are closing so if you have gift cards to places, please use them and watch at Xmas time for gift cards. My friend emailed me a list of stores closing down.
At the "very beginning" of the Extra video clip, it look like Kiefer was about to step aside and stand next to the girl by the wall but Evelyn redirected him to talk to Extra after the photo shot was over.
BTW...Kiefer had a ring on his left hand at the Paleys Event when he was signing autographs outside on the Hollywood.TV clip video. It doesn't look like the blue one but it is not a wedding band either.
I guess we will see when the Vogue Mag. comes out, what is going on in his life or the Leno show tonight.
I saw the clip too, and I thought he was wearing a ring on his middle finger, which surprised me because i've never seen him do that before. But it was such a quick flash, it's hard to tell. And I agree that he well could have been with the girl standing against the wall.
12:16pm Please look again because I think it was on his ring finger. It might have looked like the middle finger because he was pointing in the video but I can't tell. Can you?
11:23...Thanks for the heads-up on the gift cards. I think if some stores are closing I want to keep up with my returns also. Do you know where your friend got the list at? Thanks!
Hey ladies,
I watched the autograph signing video again and on freeze frame it does appear that the ring is on his middle finger. It's a new ring (at least to me); looks gold or even maybe a copper feel. Maybe a cigar band - I notice Kiefer has been wearing rings on his more recent "dress up" events; although the other times it was that school or ancestry looking ring, but not on the casual sightings.
It's strange he wears them on his left hand. We will see on the Leno show what he does. Thanks for checking!
Hey 1:52, I am single and actually wear all my rings on my left hand too. In my case it is just more comfortable and some fingers fit rings better then others. It wouldn't surpise me if that is the case for Kiefer too. Just one other thing to consider and I don't know for sure which hand it was but I remember Kiefer telling the story that he broke 3 fingers on one hand in the rodeo so that also may come into play.
This instance was different though as the other ring with the blue stone he has been wearing on his ring finger.
I thought the same as you though that it will be interesting to see if he wears one on the talk show tonight.....
Well I donb't know what to think about the girlfriend situation and really I am beginning to really bored with the whole thing. Frankly I don't think we can trust what Kiefer says, at first I thought it was cute how he contradicts himself but Now I just find it irritating, I think the booze has killed too many brain cells. It is quoated in the Mems mag on Benny's as saying that he had a room mate, funyy cause other articles I have read say that he was alone all of the time even his father said that. and also giving up cigs for 48 days wasn't that big of a deal Bull crap, I am an ex smoker and that is a load of crap. Just like I am beginning to think Kiefer is a load of CRAP. and to think I was a huge fan at one time
2:15pm...I'm at 1:52pm and yes I know you are right about people wearing rings on the left hand. I know some guys who really don't know the difference but I thought Kiefer would since he has been married 2 times. The reason I think it is strange for Kiefer is that he hasn't wore any rings on either hand in years to events or to anything. Don't you find that strange?
5:23pm...Kiefer I heard had a patch put on him when he was in jail by his doctor for smokers so don't get to irritated by every thing people say about him. Hang in there and wait and see with the rest of us because I do understand how you can feel sometimes.
5:23 I must agree with you about contradictions. I just watched Leno, and he said his daughter was seven when he watched Finding Nemo with her, but it was out in 2003, which means she was about thirteen years old!!! His brain is fried or something.
BTW, no rings at all, whatever that means. And interesting that he was asked if friends visited, and he didn't mention Sib, just that the 24 people are his friends and fifteen of them were there.
Leno was like a rerun to me but no ring. Yes, I agree his daughter had to be older then 7 years for the Nemo movie. Was there 2 Nemo movies or one?
I think he is holding out on his fans for the mag to come out. If he does I don't think I will trust him again especially if it is about his relationship to Siob and they are a couple after he said he was single. On the cover of Mag he is not wearing any rings.
9:34pm...what do you mean about 24 people are his friends and fifteen of them were there. Where? Did I miss something on Leno? Where did that come from? Thanks
also the story on Leno about falling of of the bike is about 1-2 years old, Get some new stuff Kiefer, also last time he was carrying someting different in his basket. And yes 12:06 he states that the 224 people are his friends, which I don't buy either cause when they aksed MarkLynn if she had talked to him afer he had gotten out of Jail, she said no and it had been about 3 months. some friend that is. I mean I think that they get along really well, but not as close as he makes it out to be. I also don't beleive that 10 different friends where on safari and they only had 24 dvd's to watch that the safari people supplied. Come on get real for once
Hey everyone.
Just a few things from my perspective. I agree that watching Kiefer in these interviews could get a little annoying if you will. He does contradict himself quite abit and when he isn't contradicting himself he is repeating the same stories. I think the story repeating is just cause those are some of the stories he may think are interesting to people but at the same time are innocent enough to tell without revealing himself. Kiefer over the years has learned how to reveal much and at the same time reveal nothing at all. I also think he has a thing about time of reference. I have to admit as I get older and he is around my age I have the same problem. Things that happened further away seem like yesterday and then sometimes they don't. I think that is partly due to his age but I wouldn't rule out all the drinking over the years.
As for the rings, yes, I am curious as to why only now he has started wearing them but I can't even come up with a reason. I mean his dress seems to be the same so there doesn't seem to be any other outward appearance that has changed. I do notice and it was confirmed again last night that he only seems to be wearing a ring on the more formal events. He has not worn a ring on the more casual events like talk shows, in personal sightings, etc. So if the rings were meaningful in a relationship way I think it would make sense that he would wear them all the time. Also, it would most likely be one ring not several. I guess the question is did he just go shopping all of a sudden and start buying rings or maybe since he is probably packing up his belongings in anticipation of IW sale maybe he just found them again in his jewelry box or something.
As for Siobhan and his relationship with her since we don't have anything to go on I think we have to take him at his word. We'll see tomorrow if she shows up at the premiere. I thought she should have been at the Paley Center and wasn't but we'll see about tomorrow....
Hey ladies,
just wanted to comment on the friends quote. In the past Kiefer has said that he considers the 24 crew to be like family to him. So I really think when he says they are his friends I think he is specifically referencing the crew as opposed to actors on the set. The crew has been with him since the beginning whereas the actors except for Mary Lynn have pretty much come and gone. He has said he is close with Carlos Bernard but again I think he is mainly talking about the crew.....
As for the story about everyone in South Africa watching 24 DVDs I am not so sure that Kiefer wasn't embellishing. I mean he said that when he would go into bars and such that's all they watched. I guess we could expect him to say that, lol
Hello, i'm french and i have just seen an article where they say Kiefer has told himself he wanted to move in New York because of Siobhan, to move from LA to NY to see her becomes difficult to "manage" for him.
So, why has he said last time he was single !?
Just my two cents but from what I am seeing the entertainment news media all over is taking this NYC move story to a place they see fit. Even as Kiefer talks about it in this new Vogue article I don't think it is the news story they are making it out to be and further they seem as is the case with the ContactMusic article to be putting their own spin on things.
The Vogue interviewer actually sat down with Kiefer and in that interview it is mentioned that Kiefer politely declined to discuss his personal relationships for which there may or may not even be one thereby nothing to discuss or add to the conversation. I don't think based on Kiefer interviews over 20 years he would offer such detail as in this French article. I think even if it were true, I have my doubts, I don't think he would confide it to anyone publicly, just my opinion.
LOL, I could have told everyone 2 years ago that Kiefer at some point after 24 would end up in NYC and exactly in the West Village/SoHo areas. He has been coming here for years and he has been coming here regularly at least since 2006 long before Siobhan. That doesn't mean if he is with her that it would work out great that she lives here but I think it's rather silly that these individuals are making it the sole purpose for any move. Kiefer is very wealthy and Siobhan is in a job or industry where she has flexibility. It is not difficult for people in their positions or of their means to be bi-coastal. It's not the same as any of us trying to have this type of relationship so to apply us to them is laughable on these peoples' part, IMHO.
I think the entertainment media is just making things up as they go along as they mostly do, LOL
11:27, are you sure he politely declined to discuss his personal relationships ? i have read he politely answered about his personal life . It's the contrary.
So, for the purpose of this move to NY, i begin to wonder that Kiefer and Siobhan have a serious relationship.
Just my opinion, i hope this time, he is and will be happy with a woman. He deserves this.
12:54, yep, I went back and re-read the Vogue quote and it says he politely answered questions; just doesn't tell you what he said although those quotes may be in the full article.
I still don't think the motivation for his move is Siobhan or any other girlfriend cause as I said I think it would have still happened regardless of that situation.
That doesn't mean that the relationship isn't going to be a happy by-product of the move or that the relationship is not serious especially if he confirmed in the article that she is his girlfriend and things are going well. However, since we don't have the entire reading in front of us by politely answering about his personal life could also mean the same response he gave to the French Magazine in August which was to say he is single and enjoying himself which also doesn't mean that Siobhan is not included in that. I guess we'll have to wait and see for the article.
In the meantime, thank you for the correction as I totally misread that.
12:54, I definitely see your point on that. Even though I think the entertainment media stretches the truth it seems odd to me that they would just put this out there with nothing behind it.
So I figure either there is more to the story and Kiefer just didn't want to put stuff out there which means if he talks about it now to me that indicates a more serious relationship. I thought before he may not have wanted to discuss it cause he wasn't sure if it would last or something...
I would have thought she would have been at the Paley Center with him but I think this week will be a good indication. I mean there really is no reason that I could think of why she would attend a premiere with him.
And next week we will see the full article so we'll see if he actually addressed the question or if he gave that same pat answer and the interviewer just added his thoughts. Remember, the interviewer did put his newest girlfriend and Siobhan is hardly a "new" girlfriend....so that could also indicate an interviewer with not much knowledge on the subject and just filling in the blanks with what he has read elsewhere.
What makes me laugh is that press is sure they started to date in April ? As if someone doesn't want people to know that Siobhan was married when she started to date with Kiefer in August 2007. For his fans, she is not "newest "in his life ...
Im curious about a pic on Dazia's site. Its taken at the 24 exhibition. It shows a pretty brunette standing alone behind Kiefer who is clearly not Siobhan. Is it possible this woman was Kiefer's date that night?...
My brother is in the same situation as Kiefer & just because he is a actor doesn't mean other people don't have bi-coastal relationships.
My brother was married at 20 in 2 yrs he divorced and his ex took their daughter to Seattle, Wa. because of her job. My brother packed up everything & moved out there too because he loved his little girl so much.
His little girl is 22 yrs.now & she married a guy from Colorado 2 yrs ago. My brother closed down his business & packed up to make a big move again just to be near his daughter. He had to start his business all over but it is doing well but what is very important to him is his one and only child. Her mother became a alcoholic & my brother raised his daughter at 8, he can't live that far from her. There is so much love between them & I feel Kiefer feels the same with his daughter. His daughter might be planning a life there in NYC & he wants to be near her. She is the reason Kiefer keeps himself together. Do any of you understand that kind of love & devotion?? It's their reason to work so hard & to live for.
My brother is very good looking & was always in a relationship but never where he had a woman live with him or loved them enough to want to marry them. Even with his daughter married he keeps that part of his life separate. He is in a long distance relationship with a woman in NJ, she thinks they will get married but she is so wrong. My brother said, his been there and done that, never again & she knows this. I think Kiefer feels the same way! I get it! A guy only in their 40's don't feel lonely enough for that commitment. When their children reach an adult age and they are still young,life is beginning all over again for them & they are loving it. Its freedom.
my post got cut off...When their children reach an adult age and they are still young,life is beginning all over again for them and they are loving it. It's freedom! No committments or responsiblities.
my post got cut off...When their children reach an adult age and they are still young,life is beginning all over again for them and they are loving it. It's freedom! No committments or responsiblities.
my post got cut off...When their children reach an adult age and they are still young, life is beginning all over again for them and they are loving it. It's freedom! No committments or responsiblities.
Sorry for my 3 post. I clicked once and something strange happen. Sorry!
10:20:
Yes, I've looked at the pics of the Paley red carpet, and it seems that, at the end of that scrum, it's just the bruenette and Kiefer left on the red carpet. Seems pretty obvious that she's with him, and waiting for him. I for one think that it's good for Kiefer to be dating someone else, as Sib moved in far too fast for my liking, but that's just my opinion.
9:36, I am with you. The Post leaked that Siobhan and Kiefer were an item back in February 2007 shortly after his release from Jail. We know from pictures that he met up with her as early as the end of July 2007 as they attended a Rocco concert in NYC together and then the pics of them in LA at the end of August 2007. In fact, she turned up in a TMZ video in that same week leaving a romantic restaurant with Kiefer so it's just baloney that they only started up in April 2007. April 2007 (April Fool's Day) is when Kiefer or his PR people decided to go public with the relationship. Kiefer then continued to go public with the relationship thereafter which has always been the reason I questioned his behavior when being asked about her in interviews or being followed by the paps. It doesn't match and never has in my opinion.....
11:05, I agree with your points too. I would guess Kiefer was moving to NYC to be closer to Sarah then I would say it was due to his relationship with Siobhan or any other girlfriend. Both Kiefer and Siobhan have flexible jobs and he has lots of money. Are people here really believing that Kiefer would move his life around for her. I don't believe that is the case. Sorry, I am just not buying that. He may love her and feel commited to her but I believe she would change or give up her career first. I think this all just sounds good for the press and that's the story they go with. Also, I think some put way too much importance on Siobhan's career. It is much more likely that if it was for their relationship I believe she would move out to LA especially since she is from there and her family is there. However, Kiefer has a history here. He has been coming here for years, his daughter who is the closest thing to him is here, he has many friends here and he loves the feel of NYC. IMHO, Kiefer would be coming here with or without Siobhan and I felt that way long before he met her. Not saying it wouldn't work out for him if he relocated here and he also got to have a woman that he truly loved who lives her. That would work out great. Just saying I think it's a reach to think Kiefer is completely rearranging his life for this person. As a side note, he barely did that for Kelly and he was married to her and she had two kids, just saying.....
I think that Kiefer plays with the media. Going public April 1 could have been to get his relationship out there to the public, but why Waverly, or Iveys, or endless strolling the West Village and posing for paps, like he did in May when strolling. Does Kiefer normally pose on the street for paps? Don't think so. Then he wanted to hide the fact that she was on the beach after August 10 by being photographed alone. I also think the rings, showing up with Darla and maybe the Paley brunette, may have been partly to send messages to Sib. Don't know what the message is - except maybe, "you don't own me". Ok, maybe I'm conspiratorial in my thinking, but I'm beginning to wonder ...
Barry Manilow is the one who stole the show on Leno. Kiefer was so boring feeding us the same line that he could not even keep it straight. You mean he is to BIG to stay and listen to Barry Manilows new song. I thought he was a music lover! I guess he was rushing for the next bar instead of the likes of Barry. Barry Manilow is so much BIGGER then Kiefer will ever be. His PR's should be paying more attention then to let him walk out on Manilow. It showed so much disrepect for a true legend who worked his ass off for his career but always stayed true to his root and not let money interfere with his fans. What a down to earth and humbled guy Barry has always stayed.
Kiefer has become nothing more then a little nobody snob and liar to this once upon a time fan!!! His girlfriend is an nobody too. They both belong together. They are doing nothing but snickering at all of you and playing games. Kiefer is NOT the person we all once thought we knew. Wish someone would deflate that head of his that has grown way to big for him. He will never have enough fans to make himself into a huge star. Once 24 is over he will be too! So much disrespect and a drunken loser!!
He also said, "Drinking was not the issue"! Hello...thats why he was in jail after 3 DUI's. He is getting caught in one lie after another. Will someone wake this guy up!
Did you mean someone should deflate his ego? I would love to handle that! He is turning into a NY snob and there is nothing sexy about that. Whats his purpose in NY? A bar on every corner within walking distance!
11:15...Dumb on Leno as in dumb getting his DUI. Your right, like he had some place more important to be then to listen to Manilow. I wonder what Manilow thought of that comment??? Hope Manilow thought he was a DUMB ASS like I did!! Manilow is a great guy and I wish Leno interviewed him instead.
I wouldn't be surprised if Kiefer left cuz of the rude female comedian who followed him. Maybe they were afraid that she'd say something embarrassing about his DUI so it was best for him to leave before she came out. that's what I'd do. I thought she was crude and rude and just ick.
12:09, you hit on an important issue but I think it's plainly obvious that Kiefer is in denial about this drinking problem which is strange considering that since 2004 he has gone through 2 mandatory programs as part of a DUI arrest. In the 20 years Kiefer has been in Hollywood he has actually been picked up on 4 DUIs and once he was a passenger in Gary Oldman's DUI.
He does continue to just say he made a mistake and fluff it off I think. Btw, I do believe one of the reasons Kiefer likes NYC among a few other reasons is because he can go out to bars and clubs which are open all night and then either just walk home or take a cab without worrying either about depending on someone to drive him or getting behind a wheel drunk. I do think there is something to be said for this. This is not the only reason he loves NYC and I know as a New Yorker myself there are many things to love about it but I believe it does factor in. I certainly think it factors in more than Siobhan but it's not quite as pretty to write about in an article, don't you agree?
As for him running off on Leno, it is very likely he had to get back to the shoot. They seem to be on a very tight schedule right now to get things done so I really think that is the reason so maybe we can cut him some slack. I don't think he meant disrespect towards anyone on that show, JMHO
Thank you 11:15 and 12:49m I thought I was the only one who felt this way, I used to be a really big fan but now, I think he is a has been, after 24 is over I think that he will be too. For some reason his fans think it is cute that he forgets details of his stories. and also, all of this talk about the stuff in jail on the Letterman show was was contrived. All to [put a good spin on him being in jail. And why should we reward him for being a man and going to jail, Hell he did the crime, do the time. I realize that most celebs don't but that doesn't make him any better in my eyes. I do think that everything is going great for him now, but I believe that when 24 ends, his world is going to come crashing down. For me, now, it is like watching a train wreck wating to happen. And aslo if he is such a nice guy then who come he has gotten into so many bar fights.
Jane, what rude commedian is this? I don't remember hearing about it. Was it in the news?
Also, he hasn't actually left Los Angeles. He is just saying that after 24 runs its course NYC is where he would like to have his home base. Currently he is still working in Los Angeles and just spends his off time in NYC. Btw, that is what he has been doing more or less since around 2006 but I would bet that it became even more of a desired location after his DUI. Maybe he is growing tired of asking Michael and others to drive him around. Kinda like Driving Miss Daisy, LOL!!
I don't think the comedian would follow Kiefer they have security there and besides so what if the comedian said something funny about his DUI. What? I thought Kiefer liked funny people. It is a reality and Kiefer is going to run into a wall every once in awhile. The guy seems to be afraid of his own shadow now! BOO!Poor Kiefer!
His true character is beginning to show more and more. The lies that guy can spin! First he is single and then he starts to wear rings on his fingers. Is this the best his PR people can come up with, for drama and mystery. Who gives a shit about a nobody girlfriend that they have to spin lies about. Kiefer ego is so big that he can't tell people about her. Who does he think he is Brad Pitt for godsakes! He feels drinking was not the issue. Who is writing this bullshit in the mag!
Not to stay for Mr Barry Manilow a legend is unheard of! Kiefer thinks he is bigger and better then HIM. A excuse that he had to get back to work! OMG give me a break. You mean a bar. The lies keep popping up. His ego does need to be popped.
Kiefer was like a repeat and couldn't keep his lies straight. Thank god they had Barry to take up the slack on the show. He was worth staying up for.
Not to know how old his daughter was when he took her to see Nemo. Do they still think its cute. He was a total bore! I really believe he is dumb! He has to be.
Why would the mag believe we would really care if he had a girlfriend. I hope he does after all he is 41 years old. Unless this is to stop rumors that he might be gay! What's the big issue with the woman anyway that I would want to read about it. It will only be a bunch of lies. His life is getting so boring to even talk about! Same old stuff.
Just need to agree that Manilow was great and can still sing those songs!! I love that guy! He still looks wonderful. He was humbled enough to nod to the comedian at the end. A true star! He took the wind out of Kiefers sails. I'm going to post a very good write up on his site. A gentlemen he is!
Does "There's a thin line between love and hate " come to mind to anyone ? :-)
Well at least Nemo was a few years ago, On David Letterman he said his daughter was 21, um she is twenty.
4:02, yes... yes, it does. ;) :)
I guess Kiefer doesn't know a damn thing about music after all. Did he know that Barry Manilow crawled his way to the top because everyone said, "his looks were not good enough". That he sold his music to other artist to make ends meet for pennies but despite all that he made it to the top. I bought my mom and myself his new CD last year. Another lie to add to Kiefers list of many of not knowing shit about the music world. To walk out on the legend Barry Manilow when he is promoting a song was pretty low of Kiefer who goes around promoting his bands that will never come near to Manilows fame, even Kiefer doesn't come close to his fame. He couldn't spare Manilow 15 minutes of his time. I think that was even lower then him going to jail.
Where did this big head of his come from. He never played in any lead rolls as a actor. Once 24 is done, I know he will not have any place to go except to the nearest bar with his lush of a girlfriend to join him. Hope the 2 smelly smokers will be very happy together!
LOL, there are some crazy Manilow-fans here....
9:32, heh! I think that what we've got is a single "betrayed" Kiefer fan... ;)
No, we don't have a single betrayed Kiefer fan because it would seem I felt the same way, that Kiefer didn't stay to see Barry Manilow was rude. People just need Kiefer for a fan they can't have others, that's silly. I happen to agree that Manilow stole the show from Kiefer especially since I always loved his music. Lets face it...we hear Kiefers lines before and his fans wanted more. He was a disappointment and Manilow was a big surprise to his fans. I happen to have all of Kiefers DVD's and all of Barrys CD's. Manilow is huge and Kiefer shouldn't have walked out on him. Big mistake! It would seem Kiefer is getting "Dumb & Dumber", forget "Driving Miss Daisy" which was cute BTW. This is why Barry is where he is at and Kiefer is still waiting to get there!
Pics of Kiefer at the 24 premiere in NY have been posted on fansites and so far it looks like Siobhan wasnt there, which is a big statement to me. Cant think why she wouldnt be there?
(She may have been but no pics of her yet)
If she didnt attend then it certainly could say something about the status of their relationship ..if there still is one.
I think it is time that Kiefer bleached his teeth or gave up the cigs. Yuck such yellow teeth.
3:06, I understand some of your points here. It does seem coincidental that Kiefer has all of a sudden started wearing rings and if you notice he only wears them to formal events where he expects pics to be taken; last night was yet another example. He hasn't been seen wearing rings in the less formal settings. Again, he could also have just decided they make him look more dressy or something but kinda odd to me of the timing.
Also, the blurb about Sib in the new Men's Vogue is also curious. Why does she make such a scene. It's almost as if they rehearsed it or something just by the way she came in and announced that she left her phone in the studio. I mean don't we women put our phones back in our bags or close to them. Also, if she has a key then why not just go get it. Either she was trying to insert herself into the picture and she did get a nice mention again if you notice. You know like what a stabalizing person she has been in his life. Or he was trying to make a point that he is a manly man and can get a girl in his life so stop with the gay rumors already. I think his PR people can kill lots of birds with one stone if you will.
Just my taking. Maybe it's all wrong but makes me curious.....
LOL This scene is very funny and strange at the same time : the girlfriend who interrupted the interview to tell she left her phone in the studio ?
She seems a little bit stupid...
7:42 Sorry, I don't understand this: is the story with the phone etc. just a picture or did it really happen? Is this a blurb you can read somewhere?
8:03, it plays out like a scene from a movie almost if you think about it. Obviously she either spent the night or met up with him in his apartment that morning and he most likely told her he had this interview scheduled. Then she manages to show up. I think this resturant is right next door to his apartment. How convenient for her.
P.S. I had a thought she was living with him but that doesn't make sense unless she also left her keys in the apartment, LOL....and how exactly did she get that job again????
8:12, it is part of the interview Kiefer does with Men's Vogue. The interviewer is telling us how after they sat down for the interview a dark haired woman, Siobhan B. walks over to Kiefer and announces that she left her phone in his studio which the interviewer summizes is his apartment. Then the interviewer tells us that Kiefer responds by telling her he will "find her later"....
From what I can read in the interview Kiefer offers nothing on Siobhan other than this appearance. If she didn't show up during the interview doesn't look like her name would have even come up. That's why I wonder about the setup..
8:15 and 8:25, totally agree with you. So, he doesn't talk about her and he doesn't talk about coming in NY to live with her ?
thanks for you answer
Thanks 8:25!
Wow - that sounds suspicious! She really wants to be "famous"....! I wish I could get the Men's Vogue over here, so I could read all this...
8:38, I re-read it and no I don't see anything about her at all except that one portion when she interupts them and makes her presence known (kinda sounds like her though, doesn't it, lol)....he talks about 24, his jail, smoking, drinking, his family, his father and mother, politics, NYC but nope, no Siobhan talk.....I guess once again more questions than answers about their relationship but I think Kiefer wants it that way.
thank you ! 9:07 .
ladies, here is the exact section as it reads in the article,
"Now here we are, barely ten minutes into our conversation when a tall, dark-haired woman brushes his shoulder, excusing herself for interrupting. "I left my phone in the studio," she says, apparently referring to Sutherland's apartment in the city. The actor, squeezed against the wall, half stands in a courtly fashion. the woman turns out to be Siobhan Bonnouvrier, the style director at Allure magazine and Sutherland's girlfriend of several months. She has been, by all accounts, a stabilizing influence. "I'll find you in a minute," he says, verring into his signature smoke-and-a-shot-glass whisper especially for her.
A stabilizing influence...I just love that one! I think the interviewer has the "wrong girl". If he knew her he wouldn't make that kind of statement, plus Kiefer knew her for a year now, not several months. Wrong person and lies!
His signature smoke-and-a-shot-glass-whiper especially for her...Is this interviewer for real! Kiefer always sounds like that. Who is this person? Another interview gone bad in my opinion. What a waste...
That whole section is strange to me. She just shows up and the interviewer puts his spin on things. Does Kiefer actually introduce them and why doesn't he ask her to sit down and join them? Where does she go? Does she run off to the back of the restaurant and wait for him to open up the studio? Doesn't she have a key?
Why the theatrics from both of them?
Then nothing else about her in the entire interview.
Wow, he must really not want to talk about his relationships, even a serious one, LOL!!!
Thanks for the info 9:40. I have to agree the interviewer has it all wrong and Kiefer's PR's should correct it. I thought they do things like that. What's he paying them for.
8:15am Your PS has a good point...where is her KEY?
Why so much drama going on over a girlfriend? Does his PR's realize it makes Kiefer look like a schemer with this woman. Ever since he met her the lies he tells keep coming out. What happen to him being single? Another lie? Never would believe Kiefer would end up like this...a total schemer & liar! Is she worth it???
I'm one fan who can't count on him being honest........He lost it and over a nobody!
Hm - she needs to get in his apartment - and he doesn't give her his keys so she can catch the phone herself? Doesn't look like a lot of trust to me.....
11:21, you hit on what has been my point since the beginning of this whole relationship. It was done in secret with the date at the end of July and then end of August when she was still married then we had the secret dating in February and then this big coming out on April 1st followed up with more big publicity shoots. Remember, it was Kiefer who pushed this all forth. It wasn't the media or his fans who were "getting into his private affairs". He put this stuff out there. Then all of a sudden he pretends that everyone is overreacting and he denies all the engagement rumors and states how he is single and happy about it, blah blah blah. Now we get all the rings. Btw, in the photos from last night we get yet a third ring on his right ring finger. Did he all of a sudden just go jewelry shopping and buy all these rings, what's the deal with that? Nothing is seeming natural to me.
As a fan, it's just curious to me cause I don't recall this sort of gamesmanship with Kiefer before. Just didn't seem so important....
He could have come out from the very beginning with Siobhan and made it normal. Instead we got all the outings, then denials, then deceptions and I think most or all of his fans would have accepted this as a serious relationship and accepted her even if reluctingly. I know I would have cause at least I wouldn't feel like he is making fools of us. I know it's his business but it seems kinda silly to me....
Kiefer has taken other woman to events, why hide her in the closet...like she is a big secret. Big Deal! Is he really being honest with his fans. I think not.
I for one have believed a long time ago that they both are playing with his fans and loving it! Both are schemers and liars in my opinion. Kiefer is just to dumb to realize the fans will start to catch on. Both ARROGANT people. Trust me he doesn't care about his fans who made him rich, we are nobodies to them. The Mag that included her proves it and lied about being single. Didn't think he would do it but he did. Christ did he have to lie about her to his fans. We are idoits to him. I'm gone!
11:53, I think it has more to do with her ambitions than Kiefer not appreciating his fans. I think she wants her name in lights and the way to do that is to attach herself to someone famous. He was an easy and available target for her. Notice again that we get yet another possitive line about her being a "stabilizing person" in his life. Doesn't appear he actually said that but she always comes across smelling like a rose whenever she is mentioned.
I think when he came out of jail he was in a very low place and she was conveniently there to pick him up.
After time I think he has come to realize that she is a bore and someone who clearly wants attention. I think under the circumstances he handled her well during this interuption.
He certainly couldn't be rude to her. I think more time will tell. We may expect to see him still with her as a casual thing but if she was more serious she would be at these events.
There was absolutely no reason for him not to take her to the Paley Center last week or this premiere event last night unless she isn't a serious person in his life from his perspective.
I think she, of course, has other ideas, LOL!!!
Btw, I am not convinced she didn't forget that phone on purpose, wink wink
I don't know but there were many people at the premiere 24 redemption party and perhaps she was there but we have no pics.
According to me, they are dating each other but don't live together and that's why he said "no, i'm single and happy like that". I don't trust this woman, i was looking this black and white pic with her ex husband David, and i told myself, she was so happy with this man and 2 months later she was with Kiefer...
11:40AM and 11:53AM...Kiefer is going to have alot of angry fans coming his way over his lies when the Magazine hits the stores. I agree 100% that it was so silly to lie about him dating her. I sure as hell wouldn't let him hide me in a closet! We are not suppose to know he dates at 41. Showing pics of him drinking & drunk in bars isn't that considered personal but a girlfriend is off limits. Don't get it! Its silly to lie about it and play games with fans.
Maybe he wants out of 24 and by playing games with his fans it's his way of getting out of it. I was reading on a site that the crew on 24 have to wait for him to sober up before they can start shooting. He doesn't care how late the crew gets home to their families and he messed up alot of their weekends because of it. I had a feeling that something was going on with the crew at 24 and why they didn't want to shot in LA any longer. The crew in Africa weren't the same crew and the ones in Washington DC were different too. How sad is that!
12:47, what makes you say they had different crews. Didn't Kiefer say on Leno that these are his friends when he talked about the Africa trip. Doesn't sound like a new crew to me. Am I mistaken?
I think Kiefer is snickering at all of us just like she is...Why single and then all the rings on his fingers as she was doing? Why hide her from events like someone else has said. I also feel they are playing their arrogant games with the fans too.
People have their feels about what is going on with them and i have my feelings and I believe she will be the one to destroy Kiefers career. Kiefer just got caught lying about her to his fans in the mag, no way out of that fact. He lied on Leno, no way out of that fact. It's just beginning all the lies! Kiefer's PR's are "DUMB" shits for not paying attention to details.
Can we believe anything Kiefer says?
It was in an article about them going there and working with a different crew but I'm sure some of the old crew members went but not many. The same with Washington DC because Kiefer was the one who said on Extra, "it was great working with a bunch of DC crew people".
When Kiefer is talking about crew members he includes directors, producers, etc in the mix. Kiefer walks a fine line on the truth.
I think you girls need to read a post on Bennys site. A fan was at the 24 Redemption premiere and got to meet Kiefer. At one point he told her he never reads fans posts because he can read hundreds but it is just one bad post that he will always remember. He says he feels 'hurt' and very bad... Sounds like a sweet genuine guy to me.
Ive heard nothing but good things about Kiefer when it comes to his fans
I am sure it does hurt his feelings, it hurts all actors feelings, this is not special to Kiefer, I think that is what irritates me the most about Kiefer fans, they think everything he does is so wonderful and special only to him.
I can't believe they brought up the boards. It's a great account. Very detailed. Loved it.
But Kiefer must know that as a public person he is going to be examined and it's not all going to be good.
In this instance, from what I am reading here people just feel he is misleading about his personal relationship but maybe cause there really isn't one.
I mean in the Vogue article he actually says that he spends Christmas with ex-Camilia and her boyfriend, Jeff. So he talks about Sarah and her boyfriend on Regis and Kelly and now he mentions Camilia and her boyfriend so maybe Sibhan is not a serious enough girlfriend. I don't think she is. I think she is a casual girlfriend and therefore requires no special mention.
To the person who's pretending to be different people but isn't and who has it out for Kiefer for some reason but protests too much because, if you hate the guy so much, why do you spend so much time posting about him: you're nuts.
Its understandable that the people who met Kiefer in person were excited. It did sound like they have a great time and I envy them for putting money together to be there. Good for them! The story was written with alot of feelings and you could feel that when you read the story. Again well done.
Of course he is going to be nice to his fans face to face. Is it ok for Kiefer to lie to his fans and for him to hurt them with his lies? He shouldn't have lied about being single. What was the big deal with that? Is he not to have a girlfriend at his age. Of course he should. Was it so necessary to hide it from the fans and to make them angry over the lie, when the truth will only get out anyway? Absolutely not! I will not believe anything Kiefer will say again and I can't be a fan of his any longer. He was always honest before but he is no longer the Kiefer I thought I knew. Something has changed him and I'm sorry but he just isn't the same Kiefer. To many other lies too! His head just got to big for himself.
6:13 PM...but when was the last time Kiefer did spend xmas with them. Didn't he go on tour with Rocco one year and a skiing trip the next then he was in jail last xmas so this part is confusing to me. Can you explain it?
Well, the "Redemption" premiere was so important for Kiefer and he lookes so happy and excited. When he is allegedly so in love with Sib, why doesn't he let her share this with him? I think this fact is obvious.
I agree 6:13 I think he lied about Christmas, he even said that he went on tour with Rocco, that he didn't have anyone to spend his holidays with, I realy don't believe that he is that close to Camilia either, she sure didn't look happy with him a few years ago while she was taking him back to court for more money. Again, I thin kKiefer exagerates everything. He has also said that his realtionship with his dad is good, and from what we have seen, it hasn't always looked that good to me, but then again I would probably lie about that kind of stuff, wouldn't want anyone to know about it.
It was the interviewer who called Sib his girlfriend, not Kiefer, from what I can gather. It sounds like he didn't make any more deal out of her appearance than he would someone he was dating casually. Sure he's dating her, he hasn't made any secret of that. He's dating others too In fact he's made it clear with his actions -- dating other women, Cheetahs, Spotted Pig till dawn, etc. -- that he's doing exactly what he said ... enjoying the single life. So, I'm not sure what you think he's lied to you about?
As for Sib not being at the premier, I read that there was an Allure cover Party in LA the same night, so she might have been there?????
10:36 and 3:48, that Christmas quote came directly from Kiefer in this article and I totally agree with both of you. I don't know what Christmas he is referring to. I think Kiefer not only exaggerates the truth but makes things up because reality is painful for him so he tells us what makes him feel good and what sounds all cheery and nice. I personally think Kiefer has alienated most of his family and close friends and they aren't as much in his life as he claims. Just look at the recent Malibu set. Even though we got lots of pics we only saw his grandson there one day. We didn't see Michele or his stepsons even though we had loads of pictures and even personal accounts from a fan. As for Christmas from what I could gather in 2004 and 2005 he was with Rocco, 2006 he was pictured with Catherine in NYC and then of course last year jail. I don't quite see him spending Christmas with Camilia and her current boyfriend. Btw, no mention at all of Kelly in this interview.
5:30, I do agree with you that it was the interviewer and not Kiefer who put the spin on Siobhan. It is not clear from the article that Kiefer introduced her, etc. so I don't know what was said but it would seem odd to me that the interviewer wouldn't detail whatever else happened in that time since he wrote out everything else. He really doesn't explain how she was introduced or if she was, or where does she go to wait for Kiefer to get her phone (doesn't sound like he leaves the interview even temporarily) and since the writer tells us in the interview everytime they go out for a cig during their time together you would think he would mention it....
As for Sib, who knows where she is but I feel like there is always some work excuse for her not being at public events for Kiefer as if she has the most important demanding job on the planet, NOT. As we know, she has taken off lots of time during the year to spend with him. I mean she took off the whole month of August to be on the beach with him so she has a pretty flexible schedule....and this was following time she took in June to go to South Africa.
5:30am From my point of view I haven't seen Kiefer dating anyone else and as far as him going out without her, yes we have seen that but he clearly stated he was single. If he was single why is he still with Siob and hiding it? I know I'm not the only one who feels he wasn't being honest about it. And I don't hate Kiefer because of it. He has every right to date whomever he wishes but the secret and lies was it really necessary. Can you please explain yourself in why that is not a lie?
What about the lie with xmas? He hasn't been with his family in years for xmas. He was in Iceland with Rocco in 2004. The band tour in 2005 and a ski trip in 2006 or 07 and jail in 08. Thanks!
Why would she interrupt a interview about her cell phone being in the Studio? You mean she can't wait for the interview to be over? Why didn't she go get the phone when the restaurant was right around the corner? Where is her key? Was it a set up? So the fans would know that they are still a couple. What does being single mean? Please help!!!
How do you get the idea that he's "hiding" Siobhan? He posed for pics with her in mid-September at the photographic exhibtion, and a couple of days later he was photographed with her in a restaurant. He didn't invite the paps to take those pics, but he didn't seem to be running away. Then there was a pic of them in mid-October, walking down the street, in broad daylight. That's hardly hiding. As for the interview, I haven't read it, but it sounds like the journalsist was focused on Kiefer, and not Siobhan's interruption ... as he should have been. I for one don't pick up anything sinister in his actions. He's "single" and enjyoing his life, with Siobhan and, from various accounts, without her. As Christy said once, "big whoop"!!
8:48, It could be that Siobhan is more exclusive then most. I think Kiefer has had some one timers, etc. but no one constant except for Siobhan and he has been seen with her at least from April 1st and we know he knew her even before that. But his relationship with Siobhan is strange to say the least. To me it's not about him keeping his private life private cause in the beginning when it was helpful to his image he was out and about with her all over the place. Even now again while he is on the publicity rounds just like during the Mirrors publicity rounds her name turns up again even though we really haven't seen pics of them together. Yet he doesn't himself acknowedge that she is his girlfriend (it's always an interview or writer who interjects that) and at a Mirrors interview he was asked if she would see the movie and he stated "I don't know you would have to ask her". I mean seems harmless enough if she is exclusive or the steady girlfriend that he could modestly mention her.
Maybe he feels if he even does that much more will be asked for or maybe she is more casual then serious or maybe still yet she is just a front for something else as has been suggested here.
In a way she seems to have just replaced Kelly as a fallback. He can always say he has a steady girlfriend just like with Kelly he could always say he was married. In either case he could go on living the life he wants to whatever that means and still create an illusion. I guess Kiefer and his PR people feel that is necessary for him to do.
IMHO, by Kiefer not talking about her I think he is avoiding lying, etc. because there is nothing for him to discuss about her. There is no real relationship so why pretend there is. Under those terms he was being perfectly honest by stating he was single. Btw, I think by single he meant not married, engaged or in a serious relationship.
Because if on the other hand it was real, then there wouldn't be any reason to hide it, even for privacy sake........
3:48, I actually wonder if he talks about Camilia in such glowing terms and how close they are to dispel any negative opinion that was reached when she brought him back into court for more money.
Even though to me this is a non-story he seems to like to mention how close they still are. They are probably cordial especially since they share a daughter but I don't know about them all being one big happy family. Afterall, Kiefer's marriage to Camilia crumbled pretty quickly........but as with everything Kiefer who knows for sure.
Yes, we don't expect Kiefer to be single so why lie? It's not like she is a high profile person like Julia! What was the Big Deal? Maybe it wasn't her and the interviewer got it wrong after all we haven't seen any pics of them together. Kiefer took other women to events and she hasn't showed up at any of his, just the Fox up Front event that I know of. Don't forgot ALL of Kiefers girlfriends look alike except Catherine. It could have been one of his PR's that are always around Kiefer and they have dark hair.
Where did you read that she took off for a month in August to be at the beach house? I don't recall her being in Africa either. What site did you read about someone saying she was at an Allure party in LA. Where can I read all this information at? Thanks
It just makes more sense that he took his PR with him to the interview. Why take Siob and have her wait around for him. If he was outside smoking a few times during the interview it didn't seem he was in a rush to get it over with. It also explains about the person not having a key to go back and get their cell phone. Would he be that rude and not introduce a girlfriend. I thought I hear his fans say "what a gentlemen Kiefer is".
What I would like to know if someone has a answer to this question. Does Kiefers PR's read over the information before it is put in a mag. for their approval? Thanks so much!
10:10, I can only take a guess at some of the questions.
Based on pictures and personal sightings Siobhan was at the beach house in Malibu with Kiefer. We saw pics of them together within the first two weeks of August and a fan who rented a place next door confirmed her presence there through the last week in August. We know for fact that Kiefer had the place only for the month of August.
We never actually had proof of her being with him in South Africa in June. I myself am not totally convinced of it but there was one single sighting from a reporter who saw Kiefer having a romantic dinner as he described it with a darked haired woman who he identified as probably being Siobhan. Other than that no other personal or pictured sightings that I can tell.
I agree with you that Kiefer has no reason to lie but I don't believe he is and am not sure why fans are convinced he is. What he has done is twice through his PR people denied he was engaged, that is not a lie and in an interview in early August he said he was single which I take to mean that he is not married, not engaged and not in an exclusive relationship. I believe all of these are true - once again no lie by Kiefer.
Is it possilbe that Siob works for Kiefer as far as her styling his clothes, hair and especially him getting treatments for his face. He has the money to do this. Does she really make that much money to live alone and make it in NYC and live her life style. I would believe in her divorce settlement she got zip. This to me would explain why we don't see them as a real couple, just together as friends or her on his payroll. Alot of people take on second jobs.
Sorry, i don't think she works for him. Have you seen the pic with a fan in Paris? (on Benny Blog and 24 Forever) it was the time (after his time jail) when he went to see her there. The fan told he went to an hotel next to Place Vendome and Kiefer had been seen with her in the same place.
I mean if he feels nothing for her, why did he go so far to see this woman ?
Why was she with him in this house in Malibu ? Please, she is a good looking girl and i don't think they are just friends...In the past, even if he has always loved NY, he was more often in LA and Sarah was in NY...According to me, he is with her and she wants people to know that whereas Kiefer does not want to talk about his private life.
I think they were more serious during the April/May time period, but not so much anymore. You hardly get any pictures of them these days and he is often now seen out with other people in NY, whereas before it was the just the two of them together most of the time. And about the Malibu vacation; she was out there to be with him and he instead went to strip joints and was seen with other ladies. Not so good.
Lysette, i don't say you're wrong but i think our judgement is based on pictures or sightings. I mean we will never know.
But to leave her phone in Kiefer's studio prove they are more than friends. And Kiefer has his job and her too, they can't always be together...The fact that there is no pics of Siobhan at the premiere of 24 redemption does't mean she was not there.
Um, I have a question, a little off topic here, but is you go to Benny's and look at the pucs of him at Regis and Kelle, Is it my imagination or is he wearing two different shoes in the pics with the two ladies outside of the studios? one looks like his cowboy boot and the other his Jack Bauer boot. Silly boy
For her to leave her phone in the studio doesn't prove anything about a relationship.Where is her key to go back & get her phone.She could have met Kiefer at the Studio before the interview to talk over business with him.It might not have been her there at all.She hasn't been at any of Kiefers events expect UpFront.The event at the Thompson was for her not Kiefer.She probably asked him to go with her to see how other Photo Professionals displaying their work.She is the one who wanted a relationship but I believe Kiefer backed off from her very fast.I also believe that she could be his stylist,stars have them all the time.He went to Paris probably to pick out clothes.He is loaded down with new clothes.His face looks alot better too with all the closeup shoots with High Res.He is aware of HD TV.No,she isn't apart of Kiefer's personal life anymore.It is work related & on the friendly side for him.It cost alot to live in NYC where she lives.I think they met when she moved into the same apartment building when she left her husband.Kiefer feels sorry for people with problems & he was helping to cheer her up by inviting her along to things with him like the Rocco concerts,the beach(btw the saltwater is good for the skin)etc:.He seemed totally embarrass of the speculation that was going on between them & put a stop to it.You have to stop speculating over what mags & people say about them. Trust me if Kiefer was hot for her she would be everywhere with him.She is that type of person who wouldn't let him out of her site.Kiefer is a "very" private person & I don't believe he even let her cross that line. When your in a new relationship people are together all the time.To trust letting Kiefer alone for one moment,come on-would you with his past history?
HOW DO YOU KNOW THE WAY THEY MET ? LOL
I didn't know she was his stylist LOL.
Continued...
A Fashion stylists are responible for photograher shoots/layout/locations like the beach and they can do music videos (Rocco and Honey/Honey) besides buying clothes and accessories(the rings)for their clients events. Who knows...she might want to setup her own indepentent business, magazines go under all the time. She has the network contacts to do it.
Kiefer is looking for a new sexy image and a update to go along with his new wealth. My belief is she just works for Kiefer and I believed this for a long time, ever since the photo pics at the beach. They were too professional done and very staged. Same as the other pic of them. What star wants this stuff to come out that a professional was hired to do this! Shh...its a secret!
8:54AM...
I have worked with Professional Photograhers and I know a good shoot, when I see one. The beach was too good for Paps or Fans to provide. This is part of her job description. The rest just falls into their little play.
Their strange relationship should tell you the rest if you open your eyes! She wanted one...he doesn't or he would have kept her on display as a couple and "she" would have seen to it. She didn't get where she is today by hiding behind a closed door. If she is at events with Kiefer its because he put her in her place by putting her behind a closed door as the hired help. He will take her out when he is in need of her again. No one treats a girlfriend the way he treats her.
I'm not being harsh with Kiefer. It is what it is. She is getting payed to do her job and this job description means they will be together alot. Like I said, stars have people like her around them all the time. She might have other clients but I don't have her list.
8:18am, no, he's not wearing two different boots. Those are both his good ol' army boots. :)
As for "I have worked with Professional Photographers", my my MY, but are you ever in the know. Or not. ;) (p.s. I don't know what their relationship is but, imo, neither do you.)
see one shoe looks pointed and the other does not, still think they are two diff shoes.
yep, just went back to look, one shoe is diffinately pointed and the other is not.
Yeah, uh huh, he's wearing two different shoes and doesn't know it. *shakes head* You guys are funny.
ok. somebody else take a look, cause I don't think I am seeing things. One boot is more pointed then the other. Sorry but it could happen, I have a friend that grabbed two shoes that were the same color and didn't match. You know we all can make mistakes, even the great one.
Yep, well I just surveyed a couple of people in my house who could care less about him, and they think the shoes are diff also. I am not making any judgements, I think it is funny. I know that as a mom, I have done this myself when things get ccrazy
Sure it can/does happen but, while I see what you see too, I also don't think that they're two different shoes. From a certain angle, the toes of those boots do look more pointed and the leaf on that boot is accentuating that pointed illusion. Anything's possible, I just really think that those aren't two different boots. Even if he could make that mistake himself (which he could, of course... though one you pull on and one you tie; I think it'd be a really difficult oops to make in that case), he wasn't there alone. He's got "his people" there with him (remember, he said there were three people with him wondering what the answer to Kelly's son's math problem was :)) and they're paid to notice something like that. I just think they're both the same boot. :)
And I can see your point also. and I would hope that his people would catch it. but hey he is in NYC, Maybe it is a new fashion statement that I am not aware of. LOL
They are two different boots! I don't believe the 3 people were with him in his closet or apartment when he got dressed and left for the show do you?Would they really notice. I thought that was his stylist job. Maybe he is in need of a good stylist after all. I guess she was no show that morning. It's funny and cute!
That's funny one boot is pointed and the other is rounded. One is polished and the other is so dirty! Even the soles look different. It's interesting to know Kiefer paid's someone to dress him. Oh well, everyone makes mistakes!
Alot you know! They are not his good old army boots. Anyone can tell those a mile away.
Yes, in my opinion I also agree they look abit different because one is dirty and the other more polished. He should firer his stylist, she is becoming very lazy!
Thanks everyone, I didn't think I was crazy, I went back and watched the interview again, and I it looks like during the show he did have on the same boots, but maybe something happened to one of them. who knows.
Well, it isn't just us. Seems some other ladies on other message boards have noticed the same thing. And we here get laughed at. So I guess he is wearing two different shoes. It is clearly obvious that he is, if you look at the pics.
Maybe he gave the boot to his lady friend....
With respect (or as much respect as this silliness deserves anyway ;)), I'm still laughing. He isn't wearing two different boots in that photo. It's an optical illusion. I mean... really... 6:02am, what would've happened to his shoes between the interview and standing outside the interview?
You're all (or you one, depending) are being goofy and you must know that. *still shaking my head*
12:04pm, hee! :) Maybe she stole it from him. Evil creature that she is... ;)
Well, go tell Hoppel she is crazy cause she sees it too.
I don't think anyone's "crazy" so much as I think however many of you are insisting that it's two different boots (whoever all you are) are being stubbornly silly about this. I mean, truly, it's just cracking me up.
... and this certainly won't be the first time that Hoppel and I see things differently. :D
I don't think we are being stubbornly silly, and we can disagree, and it is not more silly than any thing else he has done or said being discussed to death.
I really do think that this is more silly than many (not all, but many) of the other things that have been discussed to death. I really do. ;)
I mean, c'mon... we're talking about one boot that you pull on and one boot that you lace-up/tie. It's not like two different shoes that you slip into or two different shoes that you tie.
I just think it's funny that people really believe he was wearing a cowboy boot and an army boot. Plus, while I can see why people think they look different in that photo (they do!), I think that an actual really close look demonstrates that they're not different. Thus, what I perceive as stubbornness. BUT, you're right, we can - and do - disagree. :)
well I just thought it was funny, and something other that berating his current girlfriend, which I don't like to do. so with that I will stop the discussion on my end. and Aside from that, I really don't care about what he does or who he was with, just like to se what is going on with certain celebs (kiefer included) but that is about all.
On the not liking to berate his girlfriends (current or otherwise), we *totally* agree! :D
... and I would think it was funny too if it were true... promise! :) I just don't think - for a single second - that it is. ;)
Oh my God, Christy, why do you become so venomous even about Kiefer's shoes! I admit my felony: I am of the opinion that he wore two different shoes outside Regis & Kelly, one is edgy IMO and the other one is rounded. But this is something endearing to smirk about and not something to get into a fight over. Honey, I truly hope that you have something else in your life besides Kiefer, because this gradually gets out of hand!
Oh my, I didn't want to start a fight with my comment about you (Hoppel) seeing the same thing I did, just wanted to prove that I wasn't crazy. lol
It seems everyone agreed that it is a different boot or shoe except one silly stubborn person who hates to admit they are wrong just out of spite. You stated your opinion "once", why can't you stop there...but "seven" times! I'm sure everyone heard your opinion the first time. How old are you...grow up! OMG, its just a boot or shoe. Get over it and get a life.
2:50PM...just because someone pushed the subject too far, believe me, you are not the crazy one. Bringing the shoe or boot to everybodies attention was cute. I had to go back and take a look for myself. It's funny! Keeping up with Kiefer is really a handful but a pleasure. Don't you agree?
I thank Benny's site for the pics and Men's Vogue magazine. I don't get where the pics were taken at in the Mag..It's not mentioned in the write up which is "strange". Usually there is a theme to go with the write up and photos. When Kiefer did the MV magazine before it was about his horses and the interview was at the farm where he keeps them. This time it looks like the Rocky Mountains but nothing is mentioned about any of the pics. Does anyone know? The title Redemption Song. Does he have a song by that title? Sorry,the photo didn't go along with the story in my opinion. Kept waiting for them to be mentioned. Thanks.
PS...Did you read the part about Kiefer Sutherland who "famously" spent nearly seven weeks in Jail. Who may I ask "famouly" spends time in jail? Now that is one "crazy" writer.
@ 2.50 pm: I know, sweetie, that you did not want to do any harm and that you considered the shoe-thing as funny as we all did! Only a "special person" (again and again and again *sigh*) seemed to take this seriously.
The above post is by Hoppel, I forgot to type my name, lol.
Hey, 2:50... no worries! You didn't start a fight. Hoppel has issues with me and, so far as I can recall, always has. It's nothing new and no big deal. :)
Like I said, if I thought that he really was wearing two different shoes, I'd think it was funny too! And we certainly can (and clearly do ;)) disagree about whether or not he is... and that's cool too.
Happy Thanksgiving! :D
Hey, Hoppel! As pretty much ever, you're waaaaaaay more upset with me about this than I've ever been with anyone about anything Kiefer-related. :)
Re: where the pics for the MV article were taken, I don't have the hardcopy magazine yet but, according to someone who does, they were taken in Malibu.
The "Redemption" in the "Redemption Song" title refers to the name of the 24 movie and, I think, to Kiefer's involvement in music... thus, the photos with musical instruments.
The "famously" in the "famously spent nearly seven weeks in jail" just means that "a lot of people know about it" in this context.
I know you don't celebrate Thanksgiving in Germany so I'll just wish you Happy Rest of the Week! :D
Just realized, 2:50pm, that you might not live in a country where Thanksgiving is celebrated either so... in case not, just a Happy Rest of the Week to you too!
At 7:02Pm...In the MV magazine page 34 it said the following and also includes a small photo..."Cabin Pressure...Kiefer retreats to the Pacific hills after shooting 24 in South Africa. On Location...Malibu, California".
Did you notice the photo with Kiefer with the Gibsons. There is a reflection in the window of a bookshelf & photo.
When I first saw this pic I thought I was seeing snow instead of sand. I like the black & white photo of Kiefer.
Don't know about the Redemption Song but I bought the new 24 DVD today and it might have it on it. When I get time I will look. My husband took the DVD with him to watch in work tonight. He couldn't wait! Our family & friends want to watch it on Thanksgiving Day when they come. It will be fun!
Happy Thanksgiving to Everyone whether you celebrate it or not. Its a time, as everyday should be, to give Thanks!
Thanks for the info at 3:55 PM. When I read the article on Benny's site I don't recall that page info on there. It was strange anyway that it wasn't written in the main part of the article.
The pic with Kiefer at the window also made me think it was snow and with all the rocks in the music room it threw me off on where the photo shoot took place. I was thinking maybe the Rocky Mountains or some ski resort because the place looked like a cabin.
It would be great when you get time to look on the DVD for the Redemption Song title. I try not to read anything about 24 because it spoils the show for me.
BTW...what did the small photo on page 34 look like. Thanks again and enjoy the holiday!
It's not odd for the "where the photos were taken" information not to be included in the main article. That info often is specified elsewhere in a magazine.
There isn't a song called "Redemption Song" on the 24: Redemption soundtrack.
The title of the article is a play on the name of the movie, on Kiefer & music, and on Kiefer (and the show) emerging from a hard year. It all fits together perfectly and makes a ton of sense! :)
@7:52 AM...The info you wanted of the pic on page 34 is one of Kiefer sitting on the deck of the cabin in a leather jacket with the ocean behind him. It would have been nice if it was included as a larger photo with the others because its another great shot of him. I know in the MV mag with his horse they included the info with the article but not sure why they left it out this time because like I said before, it was another great pic of Kiefer but small. And I think the person who scanned it to Benny's site must have missed it too or it would have been included. They usually don't miss details on that site but I really haven't taken the time to look so busy today with getting ready for Thanksgiving.
I'll let you know when I see the DVD if I get something else from there probably by late Friday going out for Black Friday with my sisters. Enjoy your holiday too and your welcome!
I agree with what many of you have said here regarding the interview,why all the secrecy? He said himself he was single and yet here we still see her around in the background. I don't think he is doing it intentionally but I'm starting to feel as though he is lying and making us look like fools.Does he even realise? I'm not sure he even knows what he is doing.It seems he wants her around but as soon as anyone mentions a relationship he denies it all.I still think that she wants more here.But what is the big deal,people would be much more accepting if he just told the truth and I don't really like Siobhan but she must be very confused.I wonder if she even knows where she stands with him.I'm wondering if he is still alittle mixed up from the bad year he has had and isn't thinking straight because this behaviour does not seem like him at all.Sam
Also just to add to what I have just written, could it be possible that this interview took place a while ago? I have not seen the pair pictured together since Mid-Sept thats all.Sam
I think this interview took place end of August, beginning of September and I'm pretty sure Sib already is history.... The last day they have been pictured together was at Sept 13th at a restaurant - the pictures, where Kiefer looks really bored... The "newest" picture (Oct 12th) wasn't taken at this day - it was sunny and hot in NYC at Oct 12th - there's no sun at this picture and for sure Sib wouldn't wear a leather jacket when it's hot...
And now Kiefer was in NY for a week - and no Sib anywhere - and don't tell me she's suddenly starting to be discreet...LOL!
All the stars lie...Kiefer will find another girlfriend, he knows we are bored with her and so is he. Nothing more to say about them. As far as the article in the magazine,the writer got it off the internet word by word. It was word by word about her in the article too because I read the same lines before. They are Boring!
@ 10.50 am: Really, I do not suppose her to be discreet all of a sudden. Good point, lol.
Well, it looks like Kiefer is back in LA after almost 2 weeks in NY. NO SIB, in the pics. Oh happy days. Still, I say that and she'll show up, like the bad penny that she always seems to be. Anyway, nice to see pics of Kiefer without her hanging off of him like he's a possession. LOL
I tend to agree. Despite several public appearances in NY and LA in recent weeks.. No Sib to be seen....
Im starting to think hes not with her anymore...
(obviously she wasnt 'the One'!)
I hope he does find someone that will make him really happy one day.. Like others I never really saw that with Sib..
I think he was happier with Kelly the most and is having a hard time replacing her..the same could also be said for Julia I guess ? ...
In my opinion she was never a nice looking woman to look at,to hard looking. I don't believe she was ever a model for one minute. Maybe worked for one doing something else but never seen pics to prove otherwise. Kiefer can do better then that!
I also believe he was very upset with his divorce from Kelly, after all they were together on and off for 14 years. Since he met Sib I believe he is doing worst and I believe he wished he stayed with Kelly. He looked alot better then and happier. He still looks like a very unhappy person to me. I just have a sense something is not right in his life.
Sorry, but in alot of the pics his eyes look like he doing drugs and its not drinking or is it from being tired. Poor guy! Maybe not?? but something is different with him. Can't put my finger on it.
What is going on with him and Rocco? That relationship has changed too, since last year. No sightings of them together. I don't know if it is possible he is gay. Something is not right, either its with Kelly or Rocco. Which? OMG...I'm confused! Help?
Kiefer has said he doesnt like to talk about his relationships with women because if the relationship ends he doesnt have to explain Why?...I think that could be the case here..
I think Sib probably thought she was 'The One'....NOT!!!
A lot of fans talked about earlier on her as if she was!....
I couldnt see what all the fuss was about her...Kiefer's dated a lot of women and she is just one of them..
Dont forget that hes been seen with Sib on and off for more than a year now (since Jul/Aug 07) and not Feb/Apr this year as some tabloids would have you believe, so my guess is I dont think we have seen the last of her.
I think her use by date has expired!
We seen Kelly, Catherine, Tricia and other women off and on with Kiefer so I don't believe that their relationship is anything special. He was in NY a lot this past month and seen lots of pics of Kiefer but nothing of them together or sightings since Sept. That relationship was very strange like a setup or staged in my opinion.
I agree about no sightings or pics of Kiefer and Rocco together after 4 years. I wonder also about all of that. Its very private between them. Strange!
Kiefer has been in NY for two weeks and no sightings or pics with Sib. IMO that speaks for itself. Obviously they did not even spend Thanksgiving together.
10:31, I am with you that I have always believed that him and Sib were more staged than anything. He always seemed "forced" with her and never comfortable. Also, it can't be a coincidence that only when he was with Sib do we get hundreds of pictures. I mean that wasn't even the case with Kelly and he was married to her. That is strangest of all to me that of all the girls he dated put together none had as many cameos in front of the cameras as Sib.
10:58 while we did see pics of Kiefer without her on Thanksgiving which is convincing to me too, I don't think we know definitively that he did or didn't spend Thanksgiving with Sib although I go with you on that one and certainly hope you are right!!
12:40, I don't know for sure if Kiefer is a truly happy person. He does look happy in many of his work related pictures but I still think deep down he is a sad person and to me the more he talks about how happy he is the more I doubt it myself cause to me he has always stretched the truth about himself abit to make it sound rosier than it was. Maybe he still hasn't stopped his drinking habits and just does it privately now cause we haven't seen him drinking in public at all. As for Rocco he did just finish doing the "Save Yourself" video and all but yeah, after seeing them together everywhere it's like he dropped off the face of the earth and almost like they go out of their way not to be seen together. Remember Dave's wedding; only Kiefer showed up and not Rocco.
Kiefer's a very private person and I am sure whatever is happening he is working hard to keep it under wraps!!! Of course, if there is nothing unusual why work so hard to keep it under wraps, that's my question????
I think everyone has made some really very good points here. I also agree that thing's don't seem right with him.He looks tired alot,with his schedule who wouldnt'! But it is more than that,I think something is missing from his life.The right woman for him maybe?I think he has found women close but not "the one" as some may say. He seems lonely and sad times. I'm not convinced he is over the whole jail thing either.Just my thoughts.Sam
Sam I'm at 12:40 Dec 1...I agree about the jail time too but where is Rocco because I agree with the person above you. Its like Rocco dropped off the face of the earth. They did a 24 video together and they didn't promote it at all yet. Its almost like they go out of their way not to be seen together. I'm beginning to believe that they might be gay but if this is so it sure is confusing because I don't believe anyone can be Bi-sexual. Kiefer seems down right sad about something and it is not Sib. I had this feeling about him way before their coming out as a lot of people have. Its about Kelly or Rocco in my opinion! Which one? I wish we had a detective or spy available. HA!HA! That's mean!!!
10:58 As far as I know Kiefer always spent Thanksgiving with his daughter and her friends, like last year.
Dec 2 5:48...Your comment got cut off but you are right. YOUR COMMENT SAID... Kiefer's a very private person and I am sure whatever is happening he is working hard to keep it under wraps!! Of course, if there is nothing unusual why work so hard to keep it under wraps, that's my question???
My opinion about your comment is if Kiefer is so very private why did he display so much of Sib? He kept it private at the beginning then in April and so on...lots of pics with her. Kiefer in my opinion only lets us see what he wants us to see. Sib was to throw us off on his divorce and maybe his relationship with Rocco. No one knew his divorce was finally going through after 4 years and its strange that he was with Rocco in those 4 years. NOW...No Kelly...No Rocco...Just little bits. Strange right?
8:32 pm, yep that is the question of the day....Kiefer is supposed to be such a private person yet he chose to put this relationship out there. There are differing views on why and I am not saying either way whether he had true feelings for Siobhan cause I simply don't know. I just always found it strange that such a private person didn't seem to mind being photographed all over the place including NYC, LA and London with this woman for about 3-4 month time period and now with several trips back to NYC no pictures with her; what's changed???. Just as an example from many private sightings he dated Jennifer for about 3 months and exactly how many pictures did we get; he saw the woman in scrubs over a period of time too as posted in private sightings and how many pictures did we get - zero, we have no idea what she looks like, do we?
You do make a good point that the official announcement of his divorce to Kelly fell in this time period which of course only added fuel to the Sib relationship fire but in reality it could have also been a distraction from more bad news for Kiefer coming on the heels of his DUI. I mean if he wasn't in a relationship and the divorce was announced I think the press would have painted him as a loser or something worse which would not have been fair but that is what I think they would have done.
As for his relationship with Kelly, I actually don't know that he truly loved her and I know it's not fair for me to say that since I don't know them but that marriage was over before it even got off the ground and even though he was officially married to Kelly he dated many women and acted every bit the single man even though he always went back to the "I am married" excuse....
I personally don't know about the Rocco situation. I mean they seem close but that could be in a brotherly way since Kiefer was never really close to his brothers and I think you have to take into account how passionate he is about helping people succeed. How many co-stars have talked about how generous and giving he is. He is just a very kind hearted person.
It may just be a case of him not finding the right woman at this time and maybe that comes after the hectic schedule of 24 or it may be that he still has some unresolved issues like commitment or something else.
Whatever, I think he is a talented acted who is always kind and sweet to his fans and everyone around him so I hope he finds contentment somewhere....
I just want to comment on Kiefer as a sad or unhappy person because when he says he's happy some people have accused him of exaggerating or outright lying (not saying the people in the most recent posts did this, because they didn't, but elsewhere I've seen this).
I don't think he is lying or even exaggerating; I think he's confused about the difference between "enjoyment" and "happiness." Kiefer enjoys his life on a day-to-day basis. Who wouldn't? But that's different from being happy. His own mother said after his DUI that she felt sorry for him being such an unhappy person. IMO, anyone who fills up their life with as much activity and as many people as Kiefer does, isn't happy. I believe it means that he's distracting himself from his sadness, and for that I'm sad for him. I know that some people will say that he's just really energetic and sociable and the like, but it's more than that. So, please don't call him a liar because you think he's exaggerating or lying to you about being happy; I truly believe he's being as honest as he can be.
As for Rocco, who knows, but, if he was ever romantically involved with Rocco, it doesn't appear that he found any sort of peace with him, either, or Kelly, or any of the other people he spends time with, so ...
Hey Alexa, well said and I agree with all of it. You make such a good point about Kiefer filling the empty space with activity and such and unfortunately I would have to add alcohol to that list.
I really agree with the part about Kiefer not lying and such. I just don't believe he does that at all. I think he is one of the few honest stars in Hollywood. He is not about fluff and flash. I think in his mind he is being honest and truthful as best he can be......just imagine how difficult it must be to have to reveal your true self to millions of people. I think Kiefer at least tries.
Thanks Alexa and Linda for your words. I can only agree to every line you wrote. To me someone Kiefer does not look as if he is happy. Just look at his eyes, even when he is smiling. His eyes are only beaming when it is about his work on "24".
Sorry Linda, but I think you are wrong. Stars are always about fluff and flash, thats why we had alot of fluff and flash with all the NYC pics and beach pics. Stars need to be seen, its part of their job description and boy did we get alot of "flash & flesh" with the beach pics. It was "setup" for Kiefer to exposes himself as a sex symbol on the beach and it worked. Look how much coverage he got from the pics in some Mags and on the internet. He doesn't get as much as someone like Brad Pitt but he got alittle. Its a business, don't forget that for one moment! Just like Kiefer selling his DVD at Best Buys someone like Brad Pitt doesn't need to do that but Kiefer does!
I'm not putting Kiefer down because of this..."It is what it is, a business."
As far as Kiefer lying. I really don't recall him doing so up until this year. In my opinion something was not right with anything he did this year and I can see I'm not the only one who believes that this year was strange with him. I do agree with you that Kiefer was always as honest as he could be and I liked him so much because of that reason but I'm sorry this year it went downhill. I feel even he was uncomfortable with himself this year. I don't know, I can't explain it! He is different and I for one don't like the change.
As far as his lovelife I don't really care. I thought he did love Kelly very much after 14 years together on and off but I have no clue. Maybe he is gay and he had a relationship with Rocco...no clue. He did seem happy being around the band. However it is strange that Rocco hasn't been around...whatever that relationship means!! Just want the fun loving Kiefer back. It was too fake for me this year!
Maybe he is sad and unhappy because he is tired of hiding the fact he is gay!!! He does see Rocco but it is very hush...hush now. It could also explain why things looked so fake with Sib...and why he couldn't make it with any women.
I think a lot of his women fans don't want this to be a possibility so they coverup this possible reality with excuses. Now that's sad!!
But,I'm glad some do see it as a possibility and are willing to talk about it or at less mention it. Good for them! You're keeping it as a possible reality because after all we don't really know Kiefer on a personal level. Do we? It could be true!
8:15, Even though it might not seem like it I think we do agree on certain aspects. I do believe some of what Kiefer has done this year, for sure the stuff at Malibu, as well as the outings at Pastis, Waverly Inn, etc. with Sib were staged and for sure Kiefer has never had to rely on this sort of thing in past years. Obviously what changed is his 2nd DUI and his probable fear of losing everything if he didn't at least appear to be "cleaned up" if you will. That is why if he has "changed" he has done so. He has good reason.....he has had no other choice.
As far as interviews, etc. I don't think in those interviews throughout the year Kiefer has lied or mislead intentionally, if at all. I think he has tried to be honest with people probably cause he can't reconcile the two things.
I also wouldn't describe what he did at Best Buys "selling" his product. I took it more of a thank you and appreciation to his fans for spending their money and coming out to support him. He didn't have to do that; the DVD would have sold regardless. Yes, it is a business and yes, hollywood is fluff and stuff but I think Kiefer has always and still is exempt from most if not all of that by the way he has lived his life. Unfortunately this year has been different for him because of what he went through last December.
Btw, I think we are starting to see the fun loving Kiefer back and will continue to do so. I want that too. I just want him to be careful about how he is doing it as to not get himself or anyone else hurt in the process. He can have fun without doing damage.
9:04, you make good points and we really don't know and obviously that is the way Kiefer wants it to be. He has never been one to openly discuss his relationships even with Julia. But I would prefer he be happy in whatever type of relationship he chooses than to parade around with someone he doesn't care for in that way. I think now that things are picking up for him and he knows the fans are still here he won't need to do so anymore. Maybe that is why NO more Sib pics!!!
It was very entertaining reading your blog. Especially all the comments about the two blond girls who met Kiefer in The SPotted Pig since I am one of them. You are not that good at research - but you are very creative, I have to say. Keep up the good work.
"You are not that good at research - but you are very creative, I have to say."
You can say that again. :)
I have to say that I come here to read everything, just out of curiosity, yes if I were a cat, i would be dead lol. However, I have never seen so much attention and speculation devoted to a celebrity, people here seem so over obsessed with Kiefer, I just don't get it. He has a private life, I don't understand why all the need to speculate about every move that he makes. I think it is just a little silly myself, Isn't there something more in everyones real life to devote some time to? just asking. I mean he is sort of cute I guess, I really just don't get it.
12:20, may I ask who you are responding to since there were quite a few posts awhile back on this subject. Thanks.
12.20 - Im glad you came and read here. All that talk about Kiefer at the Spotted Pig was just ridiculous. Im sure you had a good laugh over it!
2:44, yes unfortunately instead of a very few and I mean very few number of fans just accepting that Kiefer met up with some people at a bar and had a fun evening it turned into a film production to make the fans look silly.
This commercial break from the land of the jealous, petty and just plain mean spirited is brought to you by the current issue of Us magazine: Kiefer and Siobhan were at the Milk Gallery.
Per the famegame site, that was at the opening of the Norma Jean Roy exhibit on November 20th.
Now back to your regularly scheduled rantings and ravings.
That was funny, Jazzyhophop, I was just coming on to let everyone know that apparently she IS NOT our of the picture, but you beat me to it. lol
Told you we hadnt seen the last of her.
Regarding the date. It couldnt have been the 20th because he was at the Redempion Premiere?..(it must have been the night before perhaps?)
and even though she is still in the picture I think the relationship is not the same as it was earlier in the year. Something has changed.
I think that something has changed too, 10:04. I think it's more serious than it was.
The gallery event was the 20th. Two people who were there said Kiefer left the theatre pretty much as soon as the credits started.
We will see how serious this "relationship" is, on 9th Dec. when he gets his star on the Walk of Fame.
10.07 - If thats true how do you explain her being absent in many pics over the last couple of months? and dont say her 'work' commitments, because that wasnt the case from April thru to Aug/Sept. She always found time to be seen with him (usually on the streets of NY)
Where was she at all of his important events?
Sorry to tell that but you always wait an event to see if this relationship is serious ... why ? it's been more than one year now since they have been pictured together. 10:07, according to me, it has always been serious:
New York, LA, Paris, London and maybe Africa, she was there with him...Kiefer would not travel with her if there is nothing serious between them.
That's what i see and for the lack of "PDA", we are not with them every day 24/24.
Then why say you are 'single'in an interview if one is in a serious relationship?. Thats what I dont get? Why not just say 'I have a girlfriend and its going well' I mean who cares one way or the other if he has.
It is also oddd how she now appears in public with him only occasionally ..
It will be interesting to see if she is at the unveiling of his Hollywood star on Tues.
Just because you see them together doesn't mean they are still in a relationship. Kiefer usually stays friends with his ex-girlfriends but I believe she works for him. Its explains a lot of things especially why she isn't seen with him in LA and at other events. Kiefer has different people in LA working for him and different people in NY now. She is just a date when he needs one. He has no fun with her nor does he look happy with her or show any affection as his date. Good example: He was having fun with Tricia at the awards(hotness, he couldn't keeps his hands off her),in the NY pics and Bowling Alley pics with her daughter. They looked hot together. Same with the golf girl Eva. Even with Kelly. Big differences.
Sorry, its all business with them in my opinion. Everyone knows what her work description is and how it can work for Kiefer plus she has contacts in NYC that Kiefer needs. I also believe season 8 of 24 is moving to NYC and they are getting things setup there. Kiefer is moving his music business there. One in LA for Jude Cole to control and one in NYC for Kiefer or whomever to control. Kiefer has the money to live in 2 differents cities for business reasons and he is planning his future when 24 is over. Kiefer is too busy right now to be in a serious relationship and he is loving all the planning. We just don't know about it "yet"! Kiefer always lived in 2 different cities**
@4:50...You have a great point. I can believe what you are saying because it is strange that he went to 2 exhabition in NY with her but not the 24 Africa exhabition. He doesn't take her to anything relating to 24. Zip!!! He has his people in LA who handle that and they have gone to NYC to be there for him when it is 24 related and she is a no show!!
The only time I remember her being at a 24 related event was UPFRONT in NYC and his LA people put her in another golf cart, like that's where the other hired help belonged not with him. Like this is OUR SHOW. Funny!! Great point!! Love it!!! It is amazing you thought she might be working for Kiefer. I can totally believe a working relationship. Who knew! You have made other great points about Kiefers future plans.
you are all mad !!
We have not seen pics of her in many events relating to 24...yes OK but this does not mean she was not there...The pics we have are from red carpets and we can only see actors not their dates or wives, or husbands or guests.
I don't understand why you are so sure she was not there.
6:32, if we are mad, you are also mad LOL.
what are you doing here ?
The 24 Redemption Premiere in NYC was Wednesday, November 19th and this Milk Gallery is listed as November 20th.
To the person who stated she was only at the Upfronts in May that is what I remember too and yes, isn't it interesting that she didn't go in the same cart with him. Sorry, but is that how you treat a girlfriend and especially a serious one?
I wonder about the ladies who defend this relationship and Siobhan and all if they were Kiefer's girlfriend if they would appreciate the same treatment. You know, him not even acknowledging their existence, him not taking them to any events (I mean she is associated with a fashion magazine in NYC so she should be able to handle the attention, right?)..... Is that how you ladies think she should be treated IF she is really a serious relationship.
As for her being hired help, he treats hired help better than he treats her. They ride in the cars with him, LOL!!!
6:47 - what about Golden Globes and Tricia Cardozo? The Emmys and Catherine Bisson? All red carpet events - and Kiefer had NO problem to show up with his current lady! So why not Siobhan??? IMO it speaks for itself!
I have no idea what is or isn't going on with Kiefer and Siobhan, but I am among those who thinks that, if they're together, there's nothing at all odd about her not being with him at well-publicized events associated with his work. He said in a recent interview that he's learned his lesson about being public about relationships. If they're together and if it gets more serious (i.e., if they ever were to get married or go fully public... and I have no idea about that... I'm just saying "if"...), eventually I'm sure that word would surface. For now, if there is a relationship (I think there is but, truly, who knows?), he's clearly not talking.
As for Tricia going to the GGs with him and Catherine to the Emmys, whatever his one-time relationships with either of them is/was (imo, a friendship with Tricia and a one-time relationship with Catherine), I think that both of those were "publicity dates."
The fact that Siobhan was with him - but not there to be photographed/seen with him - at the Upfronts speaks to me more of their relationship being "real" than it does the opposite.
As ever, who knows (not me... not anyone here...) and I know that many of you disagree with me and that's fine. We're all just using our own best instincts to interpret what little available information there is. :)
To 7:30am, in response to the question about "how he treats her," I know that those who feel strongly the opposite of this will find this impossible to believe... but there's nothing in the literally few minutes total (out of who knows how many minutes, hours, days, weeks, months total of interaction between the two of them that we've seen) that would offend me if I were her. Nothing. And I say that speaking as someone who is all about having a strong, equal partnership and being very secure about my place in it.
So, for example (though I want to emphasize that I no more know exactly what the deal was that anyone else here does so we're all just interpreting what we see through our own eyes/experience), this is what I see at the Upfronts...
That was Kiefer's first truly public/work-related event, post-jail. Siobhan went with him as personal support, period, i.e., not to be part of the "public" story. We wouldn't even know she was there if there hadn't been that incident with the fan and the golf cart. So she went knowing that she wouldn't be "with him" in photographs (which would mean not being with him in the cart delivering him into the event, etc). Could I/would I do that under those circumstances - and without having my feelings hurt or feeling disrespected in any way? Absolutely!
Could that interpretation be wrong? Sure. As could all the worst-possible interpretations of their relationship/her intentions that are posted here and elsewhere. Whatever is or isn't going on (or has or hasn't gone on) between them may be something that none of us can figure out/know with our limited amount of information.
I'm just saying that there are different interpretations-from-afar available... for/from all of us. :)
That last post got cutoff before my signature printed, so here's the signature...
When the french journalist asked him if he's going to marry Siobhan, he answered : "no i'm single" he didn't answer "no, we are just friends" He said he was happy like that bla bla bla....So for me, he did not lie and he is honest. Maybe, he wants to show her at public events but she doesn't want who knows ? maybe she doesn't care about his fame and money ! I wanted to say i'm a Kiefer fan not a Siobhan one but it's time to stop talking about her like that. When he was with Catherine, it was the same thing. It seems to me many of you want him to be alone so would he be happy without a woman at his side ?
The fact is that none of us know for sure what is going on with these two. But if, and I do say if, they are in a serious relationship, than life in the fast lane is even more bizarre than I thought. Not being overly public with a serious romance is one thing, but totally denying it's very existance is beyond the pale if you ask me. I can't even imagine being in love with him (and his supposedly loving me back) and not being able to show that love when there is anyone else around. Since August he has looked totally disinterested in her. He rarely even looks at her in public, let alone speak to her. To be honest, I think I'd want to punch him if he did that to me. They must have some sort of relationship (don't ask me what). but if he is in love with her, than I say just give him the Academy award right now; he's earned it!!!
Boy what are you girls going to do, when he does fall totally in love, and maybe in is totally in love with Siobhan, maybe that is why he is acting like he isn't. And if he is in love I am sure that she knows how he feels and doesn't mind staying in the background. Cause if this is true, she knows who he is going home with and who he is having sex with. Sorry but I know some of you just can't bare the thought of him with someone, But none of you are going to have him, so just get over it. I hope he is MADLY in love so you guys will finally quit yapping. GEEZ
"Maybe that is why he is acting like he isn't"????? Huh???
1:14 ... GEEZ is right. There must be something wrong with you if you keep coming back to read what you think is pure dribble and jealousy. I can only speak for myself, and I sincerely hope he finds his true love. If that happens to be Siobhan and he chooses to keep it a secret, well then I wish them both luck with that. I find people like you to be quite two-faced. You seem to get your jollies making fun of others, yet you can't stay away from them. Can you spell hypocrite?
1:14, i agree with you but something is strange why he would act like he was not totally in love. According to me, there's no doubt, it's a serious relationship. And in some pics in NY you can see PDA there is one where you can see them walking hand in hand; at Pastis one where they look at each other and they smile. I really think he is happy with her and of course some people here like me would like to be at her place !!! No need to tell us we will never have him... i'm not Siobhan if you see what i mean ... i'm not a model. LOL but sometimes we need to dream...it's better than reality. Kiefer is my favorite actor but this doesn't mean, he's a perfect man. The women who has already shared his life were not so happy at the end (Julia, Kelly or Catherine). I also say Catherine because i saw a pic where she is with him and he is drunk and she seems very sad. I told myself : wow not so funny to be with Kiefer...
1:56, not a hypocrite, just love train wrecks.
1:14 I actually thought that earlier in their relationship there seemed to be some affection towards each other, not much but some. Clearly things have changed the past 3 months, but I couldn't say with any degree of certainty what exactly is going on right now. Hey, if they are serious and she is happy with the current situation and the way she is treated, then more power to her. Hope it's all she dreamed of.
And 1:56, your response says it all.
That pic with Siobhan was taken on the 2oth. Where is she now?.A lot of pics of Kiefer out and about in NY was taken after the 20th and no Sib.. for me its just wierd that we saw her with him almost everytime he was in NY and now we hardly see them together anymore.
you seem to forget that she has a job and she can't always be with him. When they are together it's not always in the streets or in a restaurant, no pics of them does not mean they are separated.
What's mysterious to me is why some fans seem to think that they know what Kiefer is doing every moment when, in fact, we see a few minutes (sometimes seconds) of his life at a time. We (not me and not any of the other folks posting here so far as I can imagine...) know what he's doing the rest of the time.
For example, we have three pics of him outside of FAO Schwartz on Thanksgiving Day. Three pics that probably were taken over the course of 30 seconds or a minute. We have no idea where he was going, what he was doing, who he was with, or who he was going to be with. No clue. None of us.
Even earlier in the year (when Kiefer wasn't working on 24 yet and then, later, when he was but when it was warmer weather and people are out and about more), when we saw more pics of them together, the total number of pics we saw of them didn't amount to more than a few minutes in his, her or their lives.
I have no idea who/what they are to one another, but we don't now (and never did) know what either one of them is doing every minute of every day.
The "ones" who believe Kiefer is in love with this woman have no clue what love is!!! I wouldn't let my husband go to bars on his own & he would hate it if I went without him. When we go out to events and party's we go together because we enjoy one another. If he has a trip to go on,I go with him. My husband always treats me like his lover with his arm around me or holds my hand. He is making a statement to the other men that I belong to him. I'm making a statement that he belongs to me.Trust me if she was in love with him she would be holding on for dear life to her man and the same with him. Geez!
Kiefer didn't hide Tricia, Catherine or Kelly. In public you seen him very happy with these woman and he didn't give a shit!! That's Kiefer! We love 24 and we think he is a cool guy and believe that he is honest about himself in public and talk shows. So please don't hand me shit that he wants to keep this relationship private. You have to be kidding!!He was so cute with the other woman especially Kelly and Tricia. Their pics always looked like he was having fun with them. I don't dislike Sib I just don't see anything there to look at between them. Boring!
I'm going with the possiblity she is working for Kiefer thats why we see her just a little.It's so true she isn't at any related 24 events. The fan and cart at the Upfront event,please look again at the video because she came before that happen with the fan. They were driving away in the cart when that took place...geez. Kiefer didn't need her for support on this first outing,he had his 2 managers with him whom he trust and knew for years! They love him! I totally agree she is the hired help.He went to lunches,dinners and events with his manager why not Sib too. He is not in love!! GEEZ...and no way would I be sitting in another cart. That's Crazy!
4:05pm, everyone's different.
For me, "holding on for dear life" and "being in a loving relationship" don't really have a lot to do with one another. For me, "being in a loving relationship" means being secure enough that you don't need to be joined at the hip. It's fine that you and I are different on this subject and there's no one "right" answer to "what's a relationship?"
That said, I would never say that you have no clue what love is... because you clearly know what love means *to you*. By the same token, though, you have no basis for telling anyone else what love means to them... or how love is expressed by/to/for them. You have no basis for doing that because you don't know.
As for how Kiefer feels - about Siobhan or anyone or anything else - neither you or I knows. We have our own guesses and opinions based on things that he says and/or does and based on our own experiences and interpretations of the way the world works... but we don't *know*.
@4:05 lets not forget Kiefer swimming in the ocean with a blonde woman with no top on and making out with her in a video clip. How sexy was that. Your right Kiefer totally doesn't care about the private side of a relationships. Yep that was the real cute Kiefer in the ocean that we know. Kiefer and Sib didn't even come close to touching in all the pics from their beach scene...if we did then I would be a believer that they were in love. He keeps his relationship private my foot. GEEZ
And to the person who said we don't see Kiefer every private moment well I hope you are including him sitting at a bar some place! We aren't talking about the time we don't see Kiefer we are talking about when we do see him, so get real will you. There have been a lot of pics of them together just like Kiefer with his other women but when we did see him with other women he seemed very interested in them and yes you could see him enjoying himself and at least touching them...Hello! One pic of them holding hands and you girls go crazy!
Like 4:05 said, he has had lunch, dinner and gone to events with his manager Susan Bymel maybe they have a thing going on, we have seen them both arm in arm and hugging in public why not? Isn't this the same thing we see with Sib? How is it any different? Thinking about this I can beleive Sib works for Kiefer.
As far as Kiefer not taking girlfriends or wives on the red carpet well where have you been. He can take whomever he wants anywhere he wants!!
Guess what, 7:54... he also can *not* take anyone he wants anywhere he doesn't want too and for reasons that he doesn't have to explain to you nor do they have to make sense to you. :)
Seriously, the need of however many of you it is (2, 3, 4, a half dozen?) to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt something that you can't possibly actually know (i.e., how Kiefer actually feels about Siobhan... how she feels about him... what their relationship ever has been, is now and/or ever will be, etc) is fascinating to watch.
I'm not saying that I *do* know the nature of his relationship with her. I don't. All I'm saying is that you don't know the nature of his relationship with her either.
Everyone has ideas and opinions, but the near-hysterical need of a few of you to PROVE that there's absolutely positively no way he can be romantically involved with her is mindblowing.
Out of genuine curiosity... why do you care so much whether he is or isn't involved with this particular woman?
Everyone who likes Kiefer is curious about everything and anything about him, so get over yourself or you wouldn't be here giving us your "I don't know opinions"!
7:54...yes he has taken Susan Mymel with him to events as his date. They have been together for years but that is interesting. I wonder if they did have a thing going on. I seen them hanging out together in LA. She is an attractive woman and I didn't see a wedding band on her hand. The things people take notice of is amazing to me. Sib working for Kiefer...sure why not, anything is possible. He has been with other woman besides her since getting out of jail. I'm still under the opinion that he and Rocco have something going on that Kiefer is keeping underwrap.
9:49, when did I ever say that I'm not curious about and interested in Kiefer? Of course, I am! :)
All I'm saying is that I can't possibly know for sure what's going on in his life. None of us can. Sure, we're curious and like to discuss... but there are people here who are claiming to know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, things about what he thinks and feels (not to mention what Siobhan thinks and feels) that they can't possibly know because they don't actually know Kiefer (or Siobhan). That's all I've ever been saying.
But interested in and curious about Kiefer - definitely! He's endlessly fascinating. :) :) :)
Christy, when you state that you cannot know for sure what is going on in Kiefer's life (to which I absolutely agree), why are YOU so obsessive and hysterical about Sibohan, wanting to prove that she is Kiefer's love of his life? Whenever there is a pic of them together, you chime in with very long, very patronizing and very meaningless posts.
Hey Christy, I agree with you about Tricia as she did seem to just "pop" up and to be honest the photos of them seemed to be to many and too staged, IMHO. However, that is what I have also said about Siobhan and that is why I question the authenticity of the relationship.
I don't, however, understand your take on Catherine. Wasn't she with him off and on for about 4 years and didn't he even admit to living with her for about a year or if not admitted we kind of knew about it. Outside of Kelly that was really the longest relationship for him and to the best of our knowledge the only woman he lived with since his separation from Kelly. Also, the one thing that seemed to get in the way of Catherine and Kiefer was his wanting to reconcile with Kelly. But Catherine and Kiefer were together enough that rumors of an engagement surfaced which like with Siobhan Kiefer had to issue and offial denial.
Also, to me when I look at the pictures on Dazia of Kiefer and Catherine from New Years time 2006 in NYC they are engaging one another which is more than I can say about him and Siobhan when they are walking down the streets of NYC while being photographed. Nothing looks staged in these pictures. I mean in some of them Kiefer even has a kick in his step which is his normal relaxed state.
Well Christy at 4:22 if you are looking for a "secure" relationship or marriage well "happy hunting" to you! No relationship is secure! I have friends where their parents after 30 odd years, thought their world was secure but only to end in a divorce situation. You, of course missed the point about couples going out to party's and events without their partners, like Kiefer does! No way in a new relationship of 1 yr. or a lot more is their relationship secure enough for them to do this especially with someone like Kiefer who has a history and likes to party but he does it without her anyway. He has said, many times it gets him into trouble.
I'm glad my husband and I are joined at the hip in our agreement not to party without one another. It's dangerous in any relationship no matter how secure you think it might be. The "point is" Kiefer still does this without his partner with him and he knows how dangerous he can be. So does he care enough about this woman not to go on doing it? Absolutely NOT! So get over yourself on how well you think you know about Kiefer and Sib's relationship and how secure you think it might be. There is NO relationship if he is still enjoying his time out and about in bars, events and party's without her.
The only secure relationships that I know of, are the ones made in heaven which everyone knows is bull. The only people who think like you do are the ones who sit home with their husbands or partners and don't have a social life. I guess that would make anyone feel safe and secure!
@7:54 & 11:19 your response says a lot.
Well Christy at 4:22 if you are looking for a "secure" relationship or marriage well "happy hunting" to you! No relationship is secure! I have friends where their parents after 30 odd years, thought their world was secure but only to end in a divorce situation. You, of course missed the point about couples going out to party's and events without their partners, like Kiefer does! No way in a new relationship of 1 yr. or a lot more is their relationship secure enough for them to do this especially with someone like Kiefer who has a history and likes to party but he does it without her anyway. He has said, many times it gets him into trouble.
I'm glad my husband and I are joined at the hip in our agreement not to party without one another. It's dangerous in any relationship no matter how secure you think it might be. The "point is" Kiefer still does this without his partner with him and he knows how dangerous he can be. So does he care enough about this woman not to go on doing it? Absolutely NOT! So get over yourself on how well you think you know about Kiefer and Sib's relationship and how secure you think it might be. There is NO relationship if he is still enjoying his time out and about in bars, events and party's without her.
The only secure relationships that I know of, are the ones made in heaven which everyone knows is bull. The only people who think like you do are the ones who sit home with their husbands or partners and don't have a social life. I guess that would make anyone feel safe and secure!
@7:54 & 11:19 your response says a lot.
Here! Here! The only partner Christy has is her computer. Its her social life and the only thing that is secure in her world. She has no idea what a "real live" relationship is!
We seen Kiefer and Sib holding hands once and she believes its love! At least with his other women we seen more real live action with Kiefer kissing them but in her opinion it was just make believe or staged! Never ever seen him kiss Sib, not even on the cheek with all the pics we got of them together. Does she not know what affection is or even a little touch of it is?
She said, Kiefer is keeping this relationship private. What relationship? He said his life is 24! I don't recall him saying his life is Sib. Kiefer never kept is relationships private not even when he was married to Kelly!
She is confusing me too. Didn't she say Kiefer was bi-sexual? Since she seen them holding hands he is living a straight life now, is in love and they don't need to be together at events to have a secure relationship.
Their relationship is B**S*** in my opinion. NO touchy...feely moments because they don't need to!! He puts his arm around her like he does a fan!She works for him like Susan Bymel and he is into Rocco thats my take on them. Every women with Kiefer has been staged even his wife Kelly which was strange! Can't deny that!!
A NEW TAKE ON KIEFER. He likes being around women because they are creative like he is and he learns from them. Catherine...Art, Tricia...Excutive Producer, Sib...Photographing, Kelly...Writing, John English...Horses & Ranching, Rocco...Music and probably many more. They are a part of his education that he has never had. Kiefer is a very focus guy and has been exploring his abilities with these people. In return he helps them in their career goals or pays them. It beats going to college! He said this about the Rodeo. Kiefer is into everything and he keeps moving on with his education once he is done with Sib there will be some else. He is a very interesting guy in my opinion to study.
11:19pm (hoppel, is that you?! ;)), if I read back through my posts, I see lots of places where I say, very clearly, that I have no idea what's going on between Kiefer & Siobhan... but I can't find the post(s) where I say that Siobhan is the love of his life. Can you point that post (or those posts) out to me? Thanks!
Hey, Linda! (At least, I think that's you at 6:39... :)) - not sure what you mean about my thoughts about Catherine. I definitely think they were together at some point(s). I don't think there's much question about that. I just don't think that they went to the Emmy's that year as a "real" date. For whatever reason(s), I think that date was PR-related. The reason I think that is that, while the vast majority of people looking at red carpet photos from that Emmys wouldn't have a clue (or care) one way or another whether or not it was a "real" date, those of us who are interested in Kiefer's every move know that they really weren't showing any signs of still being "together together" at that point.
But, overall, I totally agree that they seem to have had a long, who-knows-what-all-aspects relationship with one another.
As for Kiefer with Siobhan, as we've discussed in other exchanges, we just don't see the same thing in terms of how they look together. I don't think he looks miserable, etc... which isn't to say that I feel that I know what the nature of their relationship is either. Just to be clear. ;)
But I know that you see something different in the photos of them together and that's cool! :D
As for the nasty, hateful posts...
Whomever all you are, you have zero idea of what you speak in terms of my real life, but g'head, spew your bile. Evidently it makes you feel better... or something... so enjoy! :)
Hey Christy,
Yes, I was responding to the Emmy date directly cause I didn't think you felt the whole relationship in whatever form it took was arranged but wanted to verify. I don't know if I believe the Emmy appearance was staged only because they were off and on so much and even the appearance at the Holloween Party and this New Year's stroll in NYC came out of the blue in a way. I mean we hadn't seen them together in awhile before that and then they popped up. I just don't know. Kiefer's lovelife confuses me, LOL..
As for Siobhan I don't see him as miserable. I am not sure if I used that word in any of my posts but if I did that is not the word I intended. I think he looks detached and uninterested. If you see him with seemingly everyone else from Sarah, to his friends like Dave and Jude, and these pictures I referred to with Catherine he is animated and talkative, and even has a skip in his step. I just don't see that in the pictures with Siobhan but as you say different people will see different things in looking at the same thing.
Linda
Remembered to post my name this time and yep that was me!!
Christy .. why do you think that the relationships Kiefer had with Catherine and Trish were at least partly staged, including "publicity dates," but when the PR people suggested the same might be true with Siobhan, you thought that they were wrong? What about this relationship do you see as different from those relationships that you think were largely staged, or just friendships?
I'm not doubting, I just wasn't following when K was with these other two women, but from pics I've seen he seemed more attentive to them, if you will, than he seems to be with S.
Thanks
Maybe I'm an especially dense woman, but I don't understand the polarized views on this site about Kiefer's relationship with Siobhan. Some people insist that she's nothing less than the love of his life. Others insist she's nothing more than an employee. Still others say ... bolderdash, the guy's gay!!!! Not everyone falls into one of these categories, but most people seem to.
Why can't he be dating/hanging out with her, and dating/hanging out with other people, too. That's the impression I get, based on what I've seen and heard, which, like everyone here, is severely limited by Kiefer's gosh-darn and hugely frustrating lack of co-operation about keeping us in the loop. LOL
P.S. It will be interesting to see if Siobhan is at the Walk of Fame event tomorrow. If so, that would be a huge endorsement of their relationship, and perhaps put the matter to a much-needed rest. Pheeeewwwwww!!!
Aw, Alexa the voice of reason. lol I like your post.
Yes, "voice of reason" is good - but it's so much more fun to read all the other things - Kiefer is gay, Tricia and Catherine staged, Siobhan "The One"....LOL!!!!
Alexa is always a voice of reason.
Alexa, I wondered if Kiefer read these boards and of course, we know from his conversation with Dietcoke that he doesn't, what he would think of us all analyzing him in this way but I think to some degree famous people are glad anyone is talking about them at all and as we all know Kiefer is one interesting and fascinating fellow!!!
I agree with you, Alexa. But, then, I always have... ;)
What I can't figure out is why anyone thinks that I think that Siobhan is "the love of his life" - given that I've said over and over that we have no idea... because, as you say, he's pesky about not keeping us in the know. :)
Whatever the case, he's neverendingly fun to study! :D
Hi Leslie. Sorry, I missed your post.
I think that Catherine and Kiefer had an on-again/off-again relationship but that, by the time they attended the Emmys together, it was - by all other (available from afar) evidence - not any kind of steady, regularly-dating relationship.
Similarly, those of us (who are many here! ;)) who follow Kiefer closely know that Tricia was never seen and then, suddenly, when it was well-documented that he'd spent lots of the previous couple of months traveling with Rocco & The Burden, she appeared out of the clear blue sky. I don't doubt that he and Tricia are friends. I just think that their date for the Golden Globes was PR-driven.
I think that he has an ongoing relationship of some kind (note to all: I didn't say "she is the love of his life"... because I have no idea ;)) with Siobhan. I also think that, in particular, the Pastis photos (and maybe others) were PR-related.
With respect, the PR people who posted here had, imo (and as one of them said herself), a strongly anti-Siobhan point of view that colored their interpretation of the situation. jmo. :)
None one of you have any idea what Kiefer is doing. Catherine and Tricia were staged but not Sib...OMG. They were all staged probably because he is gay!
If Sib is at the Walk of Fame that doesn't solve the problem that they are together. If she is there she will be there because she works for Kiefer and for no other reason but that. He is gay!It explains everything about his life! Get over it!!!
@ Christy: Nope, I haven't been the anonymous poster at 11.19 a.m. You know that I am not afraid to state my opinion and always have the guts to state my name (unless I forget, lol, but then I will correct a minute later). Have a nice day!
As for the Emmy-appearance with Cathérine, IMO they must have had a fight before, because both of them show a really bad mood, lol. When I saw the pics, my first thought was: "Just like a couple that has been married for many, many years".
First Sib is staged by his PR's now your saying Catherine and Tricia are staged. If all of Kiefer's women were staged I guess you are saying that Kiefer is gay.
Whoever said they were dating on/off I think you have a good point. It obviously isn't very serious but maybe they are just enjoying themselves without any commitment. I have had these kinds of relationships before. I do not think he is in love with her but that is just my opinion. What was the Halloween party that I think Linda was talking about? Thanks, Sam
Whoever said they were dating on/off I think you have a good point. It obviously isn't very serious but maybe they are just enjoying themselves without any commitment. I have had these kinds of relationships before. I do not think he is in love with her but that is just my opinion. What was the Halloween party that I think Linda was talking about? Thanks, Sam
Sam, there were pics of the 24 Holloween party from October 2006 where Kiefer is a wolf and Catherine is Little Red Riding Hood and then they showed up in NYC I think for Christmas or New Years time (pictures were recently reposted on Dazia's site). I do think Kiefer and Catherine were on again/off again for about 4 years (Christy, correct me if I am incorrect on precise information in this section as I am going by some foggy memory, lol). I believe they lived together for like a year and at one point there were engagement rumors which Kiefer denied by saying he was still married to Kelly.
I don't believe he is on again/off again with Siobhan. This relationship has confounded me from day one because they seem to first meet when she was still married then she got divorced while he was in jail and it seems they connected again in February 2008 if you believe the Post which I do since it is owned by Fox and I think Kiefer's people leaked the story intentionally to set up what we saw to come on April 1st. Maybe Kiefer thought it was good and something he wanted to work at but the fact that he did such a publicity tour with her is what never made me believe it was real. Also, as I stated before he has almost from the beginning seemed detached from her as if this was forced upon him. Who knows for sure. I don't deny that I am guessing based on my own senses and gathering of information. It's just my opinion on this matter. Whatever it was or wasn't I don't believe it exist any longer but again that is just one person's opinion on the matter.
10:13, I think you are correct that we are all guessing and isn't that what you are doing? So it's fine, we are all guessing together.
You clearly stated at 10:11am Christy that you think there is a relationship between Kiefer and S, then you turn around & say "if".
10:42 you said she was at the Upfront event to support Kiefer. Were you there to know this?
3:54 your talking about what goes on behind the scenes that we don't see. We aren't talking about behind the scene, we are talking about his pics and video we see. You are the one who thinks you can dissect his every move not us.
8:06 prove beyond a shadow of doubt that they aren't in a relationship (I believe you KEEP saying you don't know about their relationship).You haven't proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is one. You are the one who is mindblowing and hysterical with the need to prove to us they are in a relationship or you wouldn't be protesting so much.
10:02 You claim Catherine didn't go to the Emmys as Kiefers "real" date & it was PR related."Shaking head at this one" The vast majority of people looking at the "photos" wouldn't have a "clue or care" one way or another whether or not it was a "real" date, but those of us who are interested in Kiefers every move only know this. Laughing...its nice you can read their minds from a photo or maybe you were on that date!
2:05 You think Kiefers date for the Golden Globes with Tricia was PR-DRIVEN but you know at 2:05pm about a ongoing relationship with Sib. How would you know what kind of relationship he has with S ...they held hands but ONE time. Did you miss the pics with Kiefer kissing Catherine & Tricia & the affection he showered on them. Have you ever seen Kiefer kiss her???
Whenever Kiefers women are mentioned besides S you become so petty about them. The only one making up "behind" the scene stories is you.
Hoppel...I'm so glad you were at the Emmy's to know Kiefer and Catherine had a fight. Thanks so much for the info!
Person Whose Post Got Cutoff, what I said at 10:11 was...
"For now, if there is a relationship (I think there is but, truly, who knows?), he's clearly not talking."
So what I said was, as ever, that I don't know. I said "if". I *always* say "if". I have my thoughts and guesses just as everyone else here does, but I don't know. :)
I can't - nor do I want to - prove that they're in a relationship. Just as you can't - though you do want to - prove that they're not.
What you (and others) can't seem to get is that, just because I don't hate (or even dislike) Siobhan from afar, it doesn't mean that I think she's the love of Kiefer's life. I have no idea who she is or isn't to him. He's not giving us the scoop one way or another, is he? ;)
All I'm saying is that you don't know either. Your opinion is just your opinion and my opinion is just my opinion.
Why does it make you so angry that we see interpret the possibilities differently? Does it really matter (i.e., change whatever the reality is) whether or not we agree? It doesn't to make me angry at you that we don't see eye to eye. Everyone sees things differently! :)
My signature got cutoff, but obviously 10:18am is me. :)
Well Kiefer had a beautiful day and it looks like all the important people in his life were there except for his mom and sister, who were both at the Canadian Induction, and Sarah who is probably having finals right now. It was so nice that he had all the 24 people there plus it looks like some of the Fox Executives like Dana W. and Peter L.
Pictures are amazing and Kiefer looks about as happy as I have ever seen him. My personal favorite is of him jumping on his star with MaryLynn cheering him on.
So many gorgeous pictures! What a treasure trove of golden deliciousness!!! :D
I love the jumping on the star one too, Linda. I also adore the one of Kiefer's face in focus in the foreground and Donald slightly out of focus just behind him (Benny has it as her banner right this second; it's just a beautiful photograph) and, of course, the one of him sitting on his dad's lap! :)
I just wish we could've heard the speeches better. Sure hope they appear in better quality eventually.
Loved seeing him surrounded by all that respect, affection and love! :D
Sib cant be all that important because she wasnt there!.
Whats her excuse this time?!
What did you think of all the gorgeous Kiefer pics, 10:04? Pretty wonderful, huh?! :)
Yes Christy. Congratulations to Kiefer!.. There's some pics where he looks like he's struggling to hold back tears. Happy, feeling overwhelmed tears. So sweet!!
Yep, I love that Banner, Christy and of course the one of him on dad's lap. Kiefer just let the little boy come out on this day. But yes, there were also some that look like he is holding back the tears and I thought a couple of him looking toward the heavens while dad was speaking, maybe thinking of grandfather.
Christy, I am with you on the speech. I hope somewhere we get at least a transcript of the words he spoke.
And now he has been inducted into 2 Walks of Fame. Amazing!!!
24 has done much for him but as some of you may have seen quoted by Peter Ligori he has done much for the Network in return. It's been a great match and we benefit which makes me smile!!
Oh by the way there were so many great photos I forgot to mention the ones where he is walking arm in arm with dad. OMG, are those adorable or what. He is chatting away, smiling and practically skipping as he is walking with dad. I swear he looks like a small boy. OMG, I am sorry but I can't help by gush and smile about this day and these pictures!!!
What a glorious day for him, and nothing makes me happier. Clearly the most important people in his life were there yesterday and notice that did not include Siobhan. That tells me all I need to know.
oh so his mother, daughter Sarah, twin sister Rachel and brother Tom aren't important either ?
Nice try 12:24 but no, of course not. I'm going to go way out on a limb *rolls eyes* and assume they were invited but could not be there. I do not make that same assumption for Siobhan. Just a teensy bit different.
LOL Linda ... I sense your giddines, and I share it entirely, believe me!!! I loved the pics of Donald looking so proud, and Kiefer looking so happy and content to be with his dad. Glorious. Absolutely adorable to see them so close, and even walking arm-in-arm. What a wonderful day for both of them. And, as OKMK so aptly pointed out at BB, what a stark contrast from where Kiefer was last year at this time. Good for him, and for them.
I agree wholeheartedly Linda and Alexa I could not have said it better and I also agree with you 12.47pm. There is a massive difference. Maybe Siobhan was "busy" but I doubt it personally I think she would have loved to have been there!But was not invited because Oh they are not together.Sam
12:24, I actually mentioned those members. His mother may still have some visa issues and his daughter I am sure has finals at this time of year. His family in Canada were at the Canadian Induction in 2004, I believe it was and as someone has pointed out I think it's a very good guess that they were invited.
While we could assume they were all invited I don't think you could make that assumption about anyone else not knowing the situation up close and personal unless you have some first hand knowledge but maybe you do......
Btw, for those of you stating so please tell me when a Style Director of a Fashion Magazine became such critical work. Even Doctors and Policemen get time off for important events in peoples lives who are close to them and it didn't seem to be a problem for her to get time off earlier in the year prior to the end of June. I mean everyone is entitled to their opinion and I am sorry if I sound critical but I don't get that thinking......
Alexa, everytime I look at all these pictures I just smile. It's wonderful for him and it is showing on his face and in his sparkling eyes.
Linda, I agree with you.Really lets be honest, I think we all know Siobhan would have probably given her right arm to have been there yesterday. The fact that she wasn't there on such an important day speaks volumes to me. As you say Linda she had time off to travel to London and LA etc so why not to this? I don't know why people want to see them together I really don't especially when he seems so happy when she is not there.Yesterday was such a great day for him.I feel like he has turned his life around in the past year and I think he needs to find someone new and good for him. Sam
Sam, totally agree. Even those who like Siobhan and think this is a good relationship for Kiefer have to agree that if she were invited by Kiefer to attend this event she would have been there with bells on. I mean does anyone really think she would have passed on this opportunity. It was probably the single most important day in his work career life. I bet it killed Sarah and his mom that they couldn't actually be there. That's why everyone in his life who could get there yesterday was there.
Believe me, she would have moved heaven and earth to be there and her boss would have understood. There is no fashion show on the planet that would have stopped her; it's just not that important in the scheme of things.
I think there probably is a good chance they are no longer together but as in all these things we really don't know. I would guess we won't know either until someone else starts being refered to in the press as "his girlfriend ". Until then I think Siobhan will probably keep that "title "
Yes I think you both have very good points and I really can't see that they are together anymore if they ever were. But the press always seem to want to link him with women instead of just saying he is single. But like you said it was such an important day.I'm sure Sarah, rachel and his mom had very good reasons not to be there.Unless she was in a coma I can't see why Siobhan wouldn't have been there unless she wasn't invited which clearly she wasn't.Sam
LOL, Ursula, if only Kiefer would cooperate...
Isn't that what his MySpace Page is for to give us these important updates on matters of interest to us???
Btw, I don't disagree with you. I think he may just very well see Siobhan sometimes when he comes back to NYC like for dinner and such just nothing more serious than that...maybe even until he meets the "One". Like maybe Annie Wershing; she is adorable. Ok, I'll stop playing matchmaker for Kiefer now. I am sure his mom is already doing that, LOL!!
Just for the record, *if* he and Siobhan are together (and I have absolutely no idea if they are and I agree that it's entirely possible that they're not... and I truly don't personally care either way :)), I think it would be possible that she wasn't there yesterday by mutual agreement between them.
I know that flies in the face of the belief that her only interest in being involved with him - ever - was to get publicity for herself... but I, personally, have never felt that we know that for a fact.
It's just another possibility. I know not one that many people here think is possible... and you all may be correct about that... and either way, it doesn't really matter to any of us from afar. I mean, right?!
What matters is that he looked like he was having an absolutely lovely time yesterday and he SO deserved it and it's a gift and a privilege to all of us to be able to enjoy all those sweet, adorable and fun pictures! :D
Hi Christy. I agree it was really great to see him so happy yesterday but that was kinda the point I was trying to make he looked happier yesterday than we have seen him for ages and maybe she wasn't there by "mutual agreement" but come on do you really think that is possible??Yesterday was such an important day surely if they were together then she would have been there no matter what?I think we all care either way because otherwise we wouldn't be here or is that just me? I would just like to see him happy.Sam
Christy, while I guess anything is possible my question is "WHY" in the world would they have a mutual agreement for her not to attend.
And I am one that believes she loves the publicity but can put all that aside if they are something to one another. It it's all about "agreements" then to me their relationship is a non-relationship IMHO.
Yesterday was an all important day for Kiefer. One of the most important in his entire life up to now so I just can't see it but maybe Hollywood is weirder than I thought although I keep thinking Kiefer is not totally entirely Hollywood even if he has to give into some of the PR driven stuff. I just don't think yesterday was about that and can't see the necessity in leaving her out if she is even remotely important to him.
I know this sounds strange but in a very sentimental way I almost found it sad to see just how happy he was to be in his fathers company and being praised ! I don't know must be my Irishness coming out lol. Although they do seem to have a good relationship now, and the pictures were so adorable. I have looked at a number of general celeb sites today and all the comments were about just how cute the sitting on Donald's knee picture were.
It seems that he has always wanted his Dad to be proud of him and yesterday they seemed very close which is great to see.Maybe he will be more content in himself from now on. And to Linda, Exactly! Why leave her out? I was wondering about something else although it isn't important, Siobhan was supposed to be a Chanel model but I'm very surprised we have not seen any pictures of her.Afterall we saw pictures of her wedding.I'm not saying I doubt she was a model but it just seems strange thats all.Sam
It was just soooooo good not to see Siobhan there in her black stilettos and black garb!
OK, I'm ready for the SB lovers to attack now...
No attack, Lola! (In fact, I'm not sure who the "Siobhan lovers" are; I think that being someone who doesn't despise Siobhan gets confused with being someone who loves her... and those two things really aren't the same thing... promise! ;))
Anyway, regardless of her relationship (or not) with Kiefer, I personally think that Siobhan always looks beautiful... but that's just a matter of us having different taste. There's nothing "right" or "wrong" about either opinion! :)
Linda, Sam, etc - the "why" of how it could be possible that they could have a relationship that one or the other or both wouldn't want to "officially legitimize" by having her at an event like this is crystal clear to me... but that crystal clearness is predicated on the fact that I don't feel like I know what her (or his) intentions around their relationship ever were (or are now... if it exists now). Because we so don't see eye to eye on that part (you're sure you know what her intentions were/are and I'm not), we'll never see eye to eye on this either. And that's cool! I just wanted to put it out there that there really is more than one possibility. In fact, there probably are many! :)
... and, dangital, he is NOT going to fill us in. Such a frustrating boy. ;)
Christy,that's Ok that you say you don't know their situation because none of us do completely but I'm just sure of myself in the fact that I have made a decision on what I think about the whole thing.And you are right he is very confusing although I don't think she is and that is the difference here.Sam
ursula, maybe it's because I have a few drops of Irish blood myself, but I know exactly what you mean.
It thrilled me to see Kiefer and his dad interacting in a way that certainly seemed from afar to be full of love and warmth... and I hope, hope, hope that what we saw represents a real change/new beginning (over the course of this last year, it seems?) for them.
... but I also felt that tug of sadness. It's just my nature (yours too, I'm thinking) to feel the full range of heartbreak (from sad to happy) when witnessing something so evidently full of meaning.
That boy has needed a daddy his whole life long... and if his dad is being his daddy more now AND he's *letting* his dad be his daddy more now... then... wow, that would be awesome! :)
I am with you Ursula and Christy, and did you see that look on Kiefer's face after Donald finished his speech and then he hugged Kiefer, then they pulled apart and then they hugged again, I swear Kiefer looks like he could just eat him up, it was like the hug he had waited for all of his life, it broke my heart. I hope that this continues and isn't just for show. I just have trouble trusting Donald, he seems so cold.
Christy... didn't Kiefer "officially legitimize" his relationship with Sib many times, such as when his PR people called her his girlfriend when issuing the engagement denial, or such as when they did the photo-op at Pastis (which you agree was a photo-op), and probably others in the spring that were photo-ops. What's changed? He officially legitimized her as his GF a long time ago, and in a particularly strong way, IMO.
Why do you "all" have to turn and twist things in Kiefer life and complicate the situation. It's simple...Kiefer shared his "Canada Walk of Fame" with his Mother's side of the family and the "Walk of Fame yesterday" was shared with his Father's side. Why is that so hard for anyone not to comprehend? It called compromising!
Sib wasn't there because Kiefer doesn't have anything going on with her. If he cared as much as some of you wished he did she would have been at his side. I'm sure his family wouldn't have cared if she was invited if it was a serious relationship. She also wasn't at his other events. Do you get the message loud and clean now! Poor Kiefer can't even walk down the street with a woman without people attaching him to them. The media has done this to Kiefer many times and that is why he doesn't explain himself to them or you! He doesn't care what you assume because you are going to anyway, know matter how many times he says he is single. As his fans you don't "hear" a damn thing he says.
In my "opinion" and I will say it again, she works for Kiefer when he is in NYC and that is the extent of their relationship which other people have created not Kiefer.
I agree Kiefer deserved this honor and it was wonderful he could share it with his father who I know loves Kiefer very much. What parent wouldn't. He also stood by Kiefer side when he went to jail. He has a great father and mother! I'm sure all of his family are proud!
Linda,
So - let me get this straight. You don't know Siobhan, but you despise her. You don't know Annie Wershing either but without any knowledge have deemed her "adorable".
That tells me pretty much all I needed to know about your value system.
That says a lot about your value system.
@ Christy:
"and I truly don't personally care either way :))"
Hahahahaha
I personally think that you can tell alot from photo's (although I know not everybody agrees with that) and that is all we have seen of Siobhan but from this I have gleamed that there is something I don't trust. I wouldn't say I despised her as I don't think any of us does but many of us are very wary of her because of the vibes we get and what we have seen of her past.But mainly because of the way that Kiefer keeps her at arms length.I don't know who said it but I agree that she works for him at times although I do think there must have been a time when they were together for his publicist to refer to her as his girlfriend and then when we saw them holding hands but I don't think it was serious and anyway he has come out now and said he is single. And Christy, I'm not picking a fight here but I think you DO care just like the rest of us or you would not even be discussing it!Sam
10:41, First off you don't know me and I don't know you so don't judge my value system and I won't judge yours.
All I said was that I think that Annie is cute and bubbly and adorable.
No, I don't personally know Siobhan but I work in the corporate world in NYC and I know of women who behave in a way that I see Siobhan behaving. They are real tiger ladies. From what we do know about her she went from being a Chanel runway model to Style Director of a major beauty magazine; what's her additional background; do you need a degree for this. Are you telling me no one at this magazine deserved the job. Oh and btw, she also happened to marry but then quickly divorce an influential man in the business and oh btw, then got divorced in December 2007 just in time for Kiefer's release and that was after she put herself in Kiefer's path while still married. Some (maybe you)think that is perfectly normal, I don't. In additon, she is a Fashionista and my opinion of that industry is pretty low and for good reason. If you want to justify those people or defend them, you have a go at it!!!
Lastly, if you are going to go after people and specific people at that when many others share my opinion of her be brave enough to put your name next to it.
Ursula and Sam, I agree with both of you with regard to Donald. I have a feeling if the only person who showed up to this event was Donald it would have made his day just cause I think he has craved his father's love and attention for a very very long time.
Linda a question for you...How do you know she was a model at all? Has there ever been a pic of her? I don't recall the media mentioning this only someone on this site stating this. Thanks
BTW...I don't dislike Siob because I don't know her but the pics of her and Kiefer tell me they aren't a couple especially the NO pics of her not at any events with Kiefer or the Walk of Fame. I believe that they might be friends or she might be working for Kiefer. I also believe she just happen to live at the same apartments where Kiefer is and this is how they met. Their relationship never appeared to me as a couple like he was with Kelly, Catherine or Tricia. I think people just assume this as I stated at 8:14pm Dec 10. Could this be possible?
Linda I hope you can help me with my questions. Thanks so much!
Hope you don't mind Linda, but I'm passing through and thought I'd take a stab at answering the above questions for Anon.
The media have extensively referred to Siobhan as a "former model," although I don't recall seeing any professional pics of her as a model; only pics of her wedding and, of course, with Kiefer. As for her living in the same building as Kiefer (apparently not the same apartment, since she had to ask him to let her into his place to retrieve a personal item, as per his MV interview), she is listed in 411.com (under Zetumer) as moving into the building (134 W 10th Street,I believe that's his building??) in January 2008.
Hope that helps.
Nope Alexa, I don't mind at all and in fact you added some bits, LOL.
Like the part about her moving into his building in January 2008. Wow, how convenient for her.
So while she is still married in July she gets together with Kiefer at a Rocco Concert in NYC and he shows an interest but oh well, that husband is in the way, oops!! No problem, she just gets divorced while Kiefer is in jail in December and then moves into his building in January when he is about to get out.
Well, either he asked her to do all of that and this would include getting divorced which I don't buy for a moment OR she worked it out nicely for herself. Then some wonder why there are those of us who have a problem with her.
Linda, you have totally said it all for me there thankyou! And those of you who keep leaving anonymous messages why not just put your name??Does anybody actually know how they met? And her divorce is all too convenient for my liking, lets be honest I bet she feels like a complete moron now after she seemed to be making a play for him and he then seemed to back away from her.Did he rent his apartment out to her or did she buy in the same block? Sam
I agree with you Linda...
11:13pm - can you explain your laughter? Because I genuinely don't understand it. Here are the things that I've consistently said about Siobhan and/or Kiefer & Siobhan:
1) Above all, I have no idea what the nature of their relationship ever was and/or still is.
2) I don't feel like I know enough about Siobhan (including what little can be known from afar) to form an opinion about her one way or the other. I realize that others do, but I don't. Please note: that's "form an opinion about her ***one way or another***." That means that, in the absence of what would be information *to me* about what kind of person she is, I don't feel that I know what kind of person she is. When I don't know enough about someone to form an opinion about them, my natural inclination is to think the best of them... but I also know that she could be a bad person... or an anywhere-in-between person. I just don't feel that I, personally, know enough to make that call one way or another.
3) I, personally, think that Siobhan is quite beautiful and I think that she and Kiefer look great together. That doesn't mean anything in terms of the nature of their relationship (which I don't know). It's just a surface observation.
So where, from those statements, do you get that I'm personally invested in whether or not they ever have been (or are) a couple?
Got cutoff before my signature, but that post was me...
Oh my - your posts are sooo boring, Christy... And always so long for not knowing anything, not saying anything, not having an opinion about anything.... pffff....
Hi Sam. To address your comment about caring (... and I understand that you're not trying to pick a fight! Me either. I really do think it's completely fine for people to disagree... :))...
I think we're talking about two different kinds of "caring."
Of course, I'm *extremely* interested in Kiefer. Everything about the guy fascinates me! And, from afar, I care about him too. Definitely! I want him to be happy and healthy and successful... because I think that he's a kind, smart, talented, big-hearted, complicated man who deserves all of those things!
When I say, "it doesn't matter" or "why do people care", I'm not referring to that. I'm referring to two things...
1) No matter how much we care from afar, we really *are* "from afar." We can guess at the details of his life, but not know them... and that definitely includes his private life. So getting really upset or angry or worked up about the women who are or aren't in his life just strikes me as... interesting. If people want to do it, that's their business of course... but, just as others can't believe that I don't see that Siobhan is pure evil, I don't see why people spend so much energy on that.
2) Above all, though, my "it doesn't matter" refers to it not mattering that not everyone agrees on this subject. It's possible to have the disagreement without there being so much anger behind it. And, with that, I apologize for any time that I've responded in anger or frustration. To me, that's kinda silly - whether anyone else is doing it or whether I'm doing it myself! Hope that helps explain what I mean. :)
... continued...
It's possible to have a disagreement without there being so much anger behind it, I think... and, with that, I apologize (to all) for anytime I've responded in frustration or anger. Ultimately, we're talking about the lovelife (or not! :)) of someone we don't know personally. Of course, it's interesting to us or, you're right, we wouldn't be here... but, to me, getting truly angry about it (whether someone else is doing it or I'm doing it) seems like a waste of energy that could be going to something more positive!
Hope that helps explain what I mean when I refer to things "not mattering." :D
Thanks, 1:28! ;)
Hi Christy,Thanks for that message. I don't hate Siobhan either, because like you, I don't know her but I don't actually care either way about her because the person I'm interested in is Kiefer.I didn't know that we were talking about Siobhan's looks, personally I think she looks haggard from all the dieting and smoking but that is just my opinion.Anyone who needs lots of make-up and sunglasses to hide behind in my opionion is not beautiful but like you say lets not fight.It's good to disagree without being nasty to eachother.At the end of the day they are NOT together if they were we would have heard about it by now and I think we should put our positive energy into Kiefer.Maybe she is a nice person but what I find interesting is that not one single person (who knows her personally)has come forward and said anything positive about her,not one.That strikes me as very strange. The only thing we heard was that supposedly some journalist had said that she had helped to turn Kiefer's life around which sounded to me like a load of BS.I understand that you say you don't know but surely you must have some kind of opinion on the whole matter?If you had to guess what would you say is going on?I understand you have doubts but you must be drawn to one way or the other as the fans have become very divided on this subject.Thanks, Sam
" So I check my map for tiny signs,
of where she's at and where she's been,
but it's made from scraps of stupid lines,
of songs and scenes and magazines,
it doesn't tell me what it means "
lyrics Roddy Frame
Sorry if i'm being a bit weird lol but every time I come here ( as much as everyone else lol ) those lyrics from my favourite musician go through by head , meaning as much as I would like to have lots more information we really know very little. we gather "scraps of stupid lines " particularly about Siobhan and try to work out " what it means " I agree with Christy it's unfair to assume the worst about someone from very little information. I don't have any first hand information about her and neither does any one else. I'll admit I liked them together but i have no idea if they still are, the non attendance at recent events could very well be significant, I don't know. :-)
Whilst I agree that it is wrong to think badly of someone without knowing them, perhaps it is also wrong to assume two people are right for eachother,and together, when they have not even been pictured together looking like anything other than friends.The point is Kiefer has said he is single!Surely I'm not alone in thinking that if they were an item or even were for that matter he would not treat her so insignificantly?And if people keep saying "I don't know" then what is the point in the debate on this matter? Just a thought and no offence at all intended. Sam
What this all boils down to is that of course no one here that I know of has any insider information, so yes, we are all speculating. I guess I thought this was just understood here, but it seems to bear repeating.
Another fact is that each person looks at things differently. It's neither fair or unfair, just the way it is. This is not a court of law, it's an internet celebrity website. It's where people talk about just what we are talking about here. Seeing as this particular topic has been discussed for quite some time now, I personally wonder why anyone who is totally neutral on the matter would even want to participate here. Seems odd to me.
Just to add to that, I love debate (as so many of us obviously do or we wouldn't be here!) but I don't know why many are sure they are together when we have not even seen one single kiss! and to be fair they have been pictured alot together this year. Maybe they just work together and have slept together a few times, nothing more.It happens.Sam
FYI, a friend doing a RE comp search checked out Sib's building last summer and saw that her unit hadn't been sold in over 3 years, the average cost per unit was 3 million and that Sib was listed as an occupant as of 1/07 as previously stated. Since the unit wasn't sold my guess would be it's a rental or maybe part of a divorce settlement. Also, he didn't notice Kiefer's name listed in the database he was checking out.
Sorry typo. Sib is listed in the building as of January 2008 like the other poster stated.
@5:37...does this mean she has been living in the same building where Kiefer is for 3 years? Would she get anything from a divorce settlement?Thanks
I thought she didn't move into that apartment till Jan/08. In fact, wasn't she living with her husband as late as October of last year?
Christy @ 1:21...You said, """When I don't know enough about someone to *form an opinion* about them, my natural inclination is to think the best of them. I don't feel like I know enough about Siob(including what little can be known from afar) to *form an opinion* about her one way or the other, I realize that others do, but I don't.""""
Does this also include Catherine on Dec 8 @10:02 when *you formed an opinion* about Catherine and Kiefer at the Emmy's together and believed it wasn't a *real* date but PR-RELATED?
Does this also include *your opinion* about Tricia and Kiefer at the Golden Globes @2:05pm Dec 8th that you believe their date was PR-DRIVEN.
Yet, it's funny *you have an opinion* about those 2 women but none about Siob because *from afar* you don't know her to form one. Did you know Catherine and Tricia to *form an opinion* about them? How strange ALL your comments are.
We beleive you are for this relationshion with Kiefer and Siob but in my opinion you are not *BRAVE enough to admit* to it because *if* it is over, you don't want to look like a FOOL. At least the rest of us can *admit* on where we stand on the subject whichever way that relationship might go and be *honest* about it, whether it is from afar or not!! You are a coward!
Hmmm ... it seems that the woman standing behind Kiefer at the Paley event (NOT Evelyn) was also at the Walk of Fame event. Dazia has a pic of Kiefer walking and she's walking directly behind him. Is she a publicist, or a new love interest??? I wonder.
11.40am, which woman do you mean?
And 7.00am that is what I was trying to say I think it is better that we all have opinions that we stick to because finally we can have a good debate about the whole thing. When people say "they don't know" it just gets ridiculous and if I'm honest very irritating.Christy you seem all for this..whatever it is between them and that is fine,(personally I think you like the idea of them together but have not seen any evidence to say that they are) but at least stand by your opinion and back it up with clear,strong sentences that make sense.i.e make a Goddamn decision and stick by it girl!!Thanks!Sam
7:00am - when I say that I don't feel that I, personally, know enough about Siobhan to form an opinion about her, I mean an opinion about what kind of person she is. I feel the same way about all of the women that Kiefer's been involved with. That is, I don't feel that I, personally, know enough about Kelly, Catherine, Tricia, etc to know what kind of people they are. That's all I mean when I say that. :)
My opinion (which is just my opinion and, of course, may or may not be correct!) about Kiefer & Tricia at the GGs and Kiefer & Catherine at the Emmys are opinions about situations, not the person involved in them. If those were PR-related dates, I don't think anything negative (or anything one way or another) about Tricia or Catherine for being part of them.
Similarly, as I've stated, it's my gut feeling/opinion (and, so, certainly may or may not be correct!) that Siobhan and Kiefer have had and continue to have a relationship of some sort. I think that, either just because or intentionally or some combination of those things, it's not easy to tell what that has been/may be now. Also, my opinion is that it's not necessarily particularly significant that Siobhan wasn't at the Walk of Fame ceremony and I've stated that too.
... continued ...
Also, I've said all along that I don't think that Kiefer looks unhappy in Siobhan's company and that, if they are involved with one another in whatever way, if that's what he wants (and I feel that we have no way of knowing that one way or another from afar), I'm happy for him/them.
I've also always said that, in my from afar observation, he seems to be a lonely soul in many ways and that, though it doesn't seem like he's quite sure how to do it or even necessarily what it really is, he does seem to crave a committed relationship (at least in some ways).
So, do I hope for him to find that *if* he wants it? Absolutely! I think that many folks here do. The difference for me is that I don't feel like I know enough from afar to know whether or not I'd think that him attempting to have that with Siobhan would be a good thing or a bad thing. And, in the absence of that from-afar information, *if* that's what he's trying to do, I'll trust that he's capable of deciding what he wants to do. :)
So, I think I've been clear - and consistent - about all of my thoughts about this situation. I can't for the life of me imagine ever feeling "like a FOOL" for having thoughts/opinions about something that we're all guessing about... regardless of how it all works out. Seriously! :)
Ack, signature got cutoff... that's me!
p.s., 7:00am... if I'm such a coward and you're so brave, why do I sign my posts while you don't?
11:40am - good catch! I don't have a clue who the woman is, but that's the woman in the striped skirt from the Paley thing, right?
Sam - my thoughts and opinions about this situation have been consistent all along (hopefully my earlier posts to 7:00am helped to clarify them... :)). The thing is that "I don't think it's possible for us to know from afar what's really going on in this case" *is* an opinion. And, in terms of debate, it's offered up in opposition to those who believe that they *can* know exactly what's going on and what Kiefer's thinking and what Siobhan's thinking.
I don't shy away from debate and I think that's really pretty obvious from this thread! ;)
As for being "for" the relationship... *if* the relationship exists... then, yes, that's correct. *If* there's a relationship, I only wish them well. I don't share the opinion of several folks here that it's possible to know enough about Siobhan, how they met, what the nature of their relationship was/is to do anything but that. I understand that other do feel they know enough. I just don't. So, yes, if they're together, I'm good with that (I feel I've been clear about that all along). If they're not together, that's okay by me too. I'm not *invested* in them being together; I'm just not unhappy if they are. And, further, if they are and it's what he wants then, yep, I'm happy about it. I just don't know that part last part.
Hope that helps. :)
... aaaaand sig cutoff... that's me... ;) :)
Re: the apartment on W. 10th, Kiefer's had the place there for 2-3 years. His real estate holdings aren't under his name; they're under "Dave T. Doglas" or "the Dave T. Doglas Trust"... sometimes "Doglas" is spelled "Douglas".
Both Siobhan Zetumer and Dave T. Doglas are listed at that address at the same apartment number (5N, iirc) at 411.com.
I don't know if that's because she moved in with him or he sold the place to her or what.
That's intesting, Christy.
She was listed at that address Januay 2008, and Doglas May 2007, which doesn't jive with how long Kiefer's been at this address. Any idea why that would be?
Alos, the zip codes are different. Doglas is 10011-4701, and Siobhan is 10014-3143. As someone from Europe, can I ask why would that be?
That is weird - it's the same address, but at the map it shows two different locations! I guess that's explaining the different zip codes - it's NOT the same building!
Well, as a NYC girl, I can tell you that Kiefer was still staying at a hotel while visiting NYC to do talk shows in January, 2007 - so, maybe he didn't get his apartment until that Spring.
Wow - same address, even same apartment number - but different places?? What a coincidence...! No wonder every one who takes a brief look at the addresses thinks they are living together... Hm - I wonder: is that really just a "coincidence"??? Or did someone want to make people believe they're living together? LOL!!
It's not the same address: hers is "134 W 10th St, Apt 5N", Kiefers (Dave T. Doglas) is 134 10th Ave, Apt 5N". Still - very "coincidental"
Kiefer (Doglas) is listed as *owner* of this apartment (10th St) since July 2006.
5:35pm - he was already photographed in front of the fire department (which is next to the apartment building) January 2007 after taping the Conan O'Brien show!
I don't get this: so he owns - or owned - both apartments?? Never heard this before - or did I miss something?
So where is this new house in NY he has just bought then?
Christy, I agree with what you have said with the unhappy soul Kiefer seems to be at times. I also feel this.I suspect that he would like to commit but maybe hasn't found the "one." I think he does know how to commit but its like he loses interest (as awful as that sounds) and then moves on to someone else.Maybe he got burned after Julia and then started to mess up his other relationships first before they could hurt him.As far as the other thing goes I really don't want to discuss SB anymore unless we see them together or he makes a statement.Thanks for clearing your opionions up, maybe I read it wrong but at times I felt like you were putting an idea out there and then changing your mind,it just seemed so inconsistent.Anyway, lets agree to disagree?Sam
CL - how do you know Kiefer is listed as owner of this apartment? Where did you get this information?
3:06 the townhouse Kiefer bought ist 763 Greenwich Street
I think it's fairly obvious that 411.com made a typo with respect to leaving the "west" off the Doglas address, so, yes, they are very likely the same address.
That doesn't necessarily mean Kiefer and Siobhan are living together. IMO, they spent too modest an amount of time together in the summer and fall (I certainly believe she was the brunette he was spotted with in NY in the fall) for Kiefer (who I think is cautious by nature) to actually move her in with him in January as a committed partner. I'm not trying to be anti-Siobhan, I just think it was more likely an act of friendship rather than love, meant to help her after her divorce, or a private real estate transaction, as Christy mentioned as a possibility. Remember, too, that he must have moved into a "studio" apartment in the same building somewhere along the line, otherwise she would have had a key to retrieve her phone (as per the MV interview, which suggests that she left her phone in his apartment and couldn't get in to retrieve it). At least that's how I interpreted the MV mention of her appearance at the restaurant.
So, for what it's worth, which is probably very little considering I haven't slept much - or well- for a while now, LOL, I'd place a bet on him lending a hand of friendship to Siobhan.
Hi Alexa, I thought it must have been a typo as it was too much of a coincidence. I agree with the friendship comment too. Maybe Kiefer rented the apartment to her after her divorce?Sam
With a bit of brief research lol the internet is wonderful ! The address of the fire station that kiefer has frequently been pictured going into a neighbouring building is given as
Squad 18 132 w 10 st
You have been consistent Christy. You basically are non-committal about everything, which boggles the mind of why you spend so much time discussing this. Surely there is something you do have an opinion about somewhere else, yes?
It's not only the "west", it's also "St" and "Ave" and different zip codes! All of it just typo?
OH my God, so are they different addresses then? He has bought that new townhouse now anyway so what is he doing with that apartment,anyone know?
The townhouse is being renovated and a couple ofthe apartment units are rented out, so I'm guessing he doesn't want to live there yet. Also, the Spotted Pig, where he was partying with Florian until 7 a.m. is around the corner, and the video on the Norwegians' site showed him walking toward it after that night of partying, so I guess he stayed there at least at sometimes, perhaps if it's convenient to do so.
And 411.com is unreliable. If the "west" was left off, then the zipcode would also come out wrong, and avenue would be inserted, since there is a "10th avenue" in NY, as opposed to a "W 10th street". One mistake creates a domino effect.
testing, testing... seeing if this works because the site's been acting weird for me today...
So Kiefer goes to great lengths to protect his privacy, and then Sib sloaps the address up there on 411.com. GOOD JOB SIB. Other than totally violating Kiefer's privacy, I can only think that he moved out when she moved in. otherwise, she's an idiot.
Hi Sam - and thanks for your post. You're right that it was a misunderstanding to think that I've been changing my opinions, but that's okay! We understand one another now... and, yep, agreeing to disagree is absolutely fine! :D
Let's just go with she is an IDIOT!
5:21am, that you think that I've been non-committal about my thoughts/opinions is a failure of your understanding. Oh well. No big deal. If ever there was an "it is what it is" situation, it would be your contempt for me... but, hey, I promise not to lose sleep over it! ;)
Christy, you claim to be such a big fan of Kiefer's. So that is why you state his secret address publicly on the internet? Oh.... my ... God .. how could you!!!!
I have no contempt for you Christy, and I do not know how you could have discerned that from my post. I was simply curious as to why you would want to spend so much of your time discussing a topic which you yourself have said you have no opinion about one way or another because you have no personal knowledge of the person we are talking about. If you read that as contmept, well I'm sorry.
Actually, Anon at 12:59, I was the one who stated Kiefer's address in NY (look back a couple of days). Maybe I shouldn't have, but it has been widely quoted in the media (i.e., Gawker, real estate web sites), as has Doglas, his real estate trust company.
Still, it probably isn't a good idea to repeat it, so I won't do that again.
HIs address is pretty much public record, I really wouldn;t worry about it too much. NOw standing in front of his house stalking, that is a problem, but anyone can find his address, it was no big secret.
12:59am, three of his recent addresses (Ironworks, W. 10th, and Greenwich) are public knowledge. Though, of course, there aren't that many people (just we all uber-fans and people in his actual life) who know or care. ;)
4:36am... ah, but I *do* have opinions (because coming to the conclusion that I don't know enough about a person to like or dislike that person *is* an opinion). That's what you can't get, but that's okay. If you don't have contempt for me, that's cool too. Also, you and I have different definitions of "so much time"... but that's okay too. :)
Does anyone here still think that they are/were an item?I'm getting confused ladies. We know that she must have worked with or for him at some point but have we seen any PROOF that they are an item?
I surrender Christy. I really don't understand you at all, but I guess it's not important that I do.
No offence but this seems to have turned into a "hate campaign" toward Christy.Don't you think we should be talking about Kiefer?Christy has said she doesn't know and that is her opinion and she keeps repeating herself and nobody seems to be listening but lets move on please! Lets talk Kiefer he is the most important subject!!
Exactly, 2:52! It's not critical that we understand one another... and that doesn't have to be a negative or be a matter of surrender for either one of us. It just... is! :D
Also just to add there only seems to be about four of us here who aren't leaving anonymoous posts which is frankly stupid.If you are leaving a post then leave a name please!!!
Thanks, Sam... and you've totally got it... my well-documented opinion is that we canNOT know for sure what the nature of their relationship ever was or is now.
... and, yep, the subject of Kiefer is never uninteresting, is it?!!!!!
1:17pm - I think that the answer to your question is that we don't have now and never have had any irrefutable PROOF that they're: together, not together, worked together, or that she worked for him, or... anything relative to the two of them. My guess is that, if Kiefer ever wants the public to have irrefutable PROOF one way or the other about any of those things, he'll see to it that that proof is made available. In the meantime, we're ALL just guessing. :)
... and about that Kiefer... completely delicious, isn't he?!!! :D
Apparently according to some sites on the CD cover to HoneyHoney it thanks Siobhan Bonnouvrier (is that how its spelt??) so they must have worked together at some point Christy.Interesting how we have never even seen a PDA though?
That she's listed as a "thanks" on Little Toy Gun isn't irrefutable proof that they worked together. People get thanked on cds for all kinds of reasons, including just being friends and stuff like that. All if proves for certain is that HoneyHoney wanted to thank her (along with many others) on the cd.
Surely it proves that they have worked together though,that there is a connection? I'm just saying that it is a possible explanation to why he has said he is single and enjoying life and we have'nt seen them togther for a while. Really its obvious that HoneyHoney know her through Kiefer but it is just a thought
It makes total sense that HoneyHoney would know Siobhan through Kiefer (though the vice versa also is an imo less likely possibility), but it doesn't directly follow that she worked on the cd/video in any capacity. She could just have been around when they were working on the cd and merited a 'thanks' based on that. She also certainly could have worked on the cd/video. We just can't know for absolute sure either way (but can, of course, guess!) based on the "thanks" on the cd. :)
I guess she helped with the styling in the "Toy Gun" video, perhaps she chose Susan's clothing or something like that. I truly hope she was not responsible for Kiefer's eye make-up in that video, eeeeek! Lol, lol, lol.
LOL, Hoppel. It was interesting to say the least but I think it was meant to give Kiefer a sinister look which it did. He'd make a wonderful Joker for the Batman series. Between that "smile" and voice/laugh, wow.
I think you are correct. It's probable that she helped with the clothing design since that is what she does for Allure. Clothes and makeup. I believe they filmed this video in March or April and if you remember the background video there was a long dark haired woman seen. Could very well have been Siobhan.
Well ladies, she is back, spotted this time just yesterday, he looks pretty content to me. At least they ate at Denny's, boyfriend needs to put some weight on, too skinny for my taste. but cute other wise. He was even opening the care door for her, looks like to change her shoes for their walk. I wonder if he is driving, I didn't think he could drive untile this spring. Anyway, he looks nice and relaxed to me. (meaning happy)
He looks relaxed and comfortable (and, for me, not too skinny... god, I just LOVE his long, skinny legs!) to me too, 7:55am.
His Denny's thing is so cute. Going way back to s1 on 24, he talked about going there in the wee hours after shooting. His essential 'regularness' in the midst of a very non-regular life charms the hell out of me! :D
If his license was suspended by the DMV for the minimum amount of time for this conviction, it would've been a year, which would've ended sometime between September and November (depending on when he surrendered his license) so he could be driving now.
Well, there is "no date posted" with the pics except for "Dec 15 which is today" and no way could they have gotten posted so early this morning when they came on the site.
I was the one who first mention Siob working for Kiefer so thanks for the CD mentioned with them thanking her. They don't thank someone who didn't work on the video or didn't take part. I also said it was part of her job description setting up Video shoots. Just like the pics of them on the beach, I mention they weren't done by the paps but a professional photographer like in the Men's Vogue mag. Wasn't it strange Kiefer and her going to Norman Jeans Roys Photo exhabition but I would guess some people (you know who) believe the Men Vogue shots with Kiefer sitting outside on the porch was done by the Paps(laughing). She doesn't make enough money at Allure to live in a place like NYC. She needs the money! I really don't care what anyone else thinks about their relationship because I have always been sure they never had one. The Denny's pic could have been taken at anytime in the past. If they are recent, so what, doesn't mean anything.She wasn't at the Walk of Fame event and that should tell you a lot. Their was another woman with Kiefer at WOFame event and she was also at 24 Africa Photo exhibition standing by the wall.
BTW Sam, just one thing we don't need to post are names its optional but I agree with some of things you mentioned. Thanks Sam!
Hey Christy. Hope you are well.
His Denny's thing is so cute. Going way back to s1 on 24, he talked about going there in the wee hours after shooting. His essential 'regularness' in the midst of a very non-regular life charms the hell out of me! :D
LOL, yeah especially driving into the parking lot of that Denny's in an Astin Martin!!! Way to feel like one of the peeps, hehehe...
10:16, I really do think those pictures are from this weekend. I think Kiefer and Sib date in some capacity and who knows how serious or not but I think it's a good chance that she went to the 24 party with him. No pictures but maybe that's why he took her.
As for the woman who was seen at the Paley Center and the Walk of Fame I have a feeling she works with Evelyn, his PR lady but again who knows for sure.
LOL, with Kiefer you never really know for sure. I made a joke about the car in my previous post. To me that seems so un-Kiefer like but maybe he is having a mid-life crisis....
I wondered about the woman at the Paley. she seemed like she was waiting for Kiefer because she was standing directly behind him the whole time, and not talking to anyone else except Evelyn. At one point he seems to take a step toward her before Evelyn points him to someone wanting an interview. Then she shows up in one pic at the W of F event. She could be a publicist/assistnat or something else professional, but she could be someone he's dating because she certainly looked like a guest at the Paley. She looks like his "type" LOL
Sorry I didnt realise you knew everything to do with Kiefer and we had been reporting to you.How silly of me.How do you know how much she is on?Alot I would say at least 6 figures..
Hey, Linda. I'm doing great and hope you are too!
Heh, I didn't even notice that the car is an Aston Martin, Linda. ;) Then again, I wouldn't have known an Aston Martin if it'd bitten me in the butt!
The thing about him now (and I think it shall be ever after now that he's hit on the gold mine that will be 24 residuals... especially DVD sales) is that, as much as his essential soul is down with the peeps ;), he's just plain filthy rich. Plus, through the years, he's always had this or that more status-y car to go with his beloved Chevy and whatever other "every day" car he's had. Yet another of the many many many Kiefer complexities! :D
p.s. I agree that the pics are from this weekend. There haven't been many days that blustery along the coast this year til this weekend.
I think that a general assumption is being made that they were in/near Malibu, but someone who lives in the San Diego area posted on Benny's that it looks like it could be La Jolla (near SD) to her. I think she's going to check the location of the Denny's around there when the weather improves.
for the person who is sure she was not at the walk of fame, who tells you that ? maybe, she was inside the hotel ... we will never know and for the date, i think it's recent, she has her same bag that she had in NY in front of the restaurant in september. To see those pics you can go to bruno press .com and i don't know why there's a pic of an hotel maybe the one where they stayed (don't know). Do you still think they are just friends OR they work together ? i have a serious doubt hum ... too many pics of two people since august 2007.
What hotel do you mean, 2:44?
2:44, I think the pictures that showed up today are from this past weekend. Who said they weren't recent?
And yes, I don't think there is doubt that they know each other from at least the summer of 2007 and yes they are dating in some capacity. I don't know the extent or how serious and neither does anyone else other than the people who know them personally and maybe not even those people. I am not sure Kiefer himself knows, LOL....
btw, are you talking about the Roosevelt Hotel? So are you saying that while Kiefer was getting his star and making his acceptance speech she was kept in the hotel just so the press wouldn't ask him questions? Ok.....
if it's true she was in the Roosevelt hotel, i don't see press asking him questions about Siobhan, as she is known now as his girlfriend, what more to say or to ask him about her while he is getting his star on the walk of fame.
I don't think he hides her, she has her work in NY and he has his one in LA and maybe when they see each other they want to be alone. But i was surprised not to see her on the walk of fame...
Something i don't understand with Kiefer he never takes her in his arms she is always the one to hold his arm. Is he shy with the camera ?
I don't think Kiefer is shy with the camera! lol! just look at some of the past photos with him and women,mmnn the Los Feliz Golf Course photographs come to mind..And Linda you are correct with your assumption there is no way she was hidden away in a hotel some place that is just taking things to extreme.I do not believe their relationship is serious enough for her to warrant an invitation to something as important as the star day.If I was Siobhan I would be pissed at him for the way he has treat her if they are having a "relationship." I don't want to sound rude towards Kiefer but he isn't famous enough to go to the lengths of "hiding her away" so the paps wouldn't ask questions.Let's be honest she is hardly Julia Roberts.JMHO :)
Dazia said, on her site that she had no idea of the dates to confirm them. Maybe they were done in Sept because someone said it was the same handbag.
If it was serious she would have been at th W of F event. Why would he hide her in a hotel when everyone else was there.I agree she is no Julia, where he has a need to hide her. He has taken other women to events and Kiefer has handle that fine. Who would want to miss that event? I also agree she is working for him. She was holding his arm big deal. Kiefer did not touch her at all in the pics, *he never does*.
I hear Rocco was at the event but she was a no show by a insider at Penny's site.
It would seem the new pics came from the same source as the beach pics.
It would seem Kiefer stays friends with all his ex-girlfriends and ends up finding jobs for them. They aren't taking his money. He has been there and done that!
I believe he uses her as a decoy. Rocco is the one he was hiding at the WF event not her. We knew Rocco was at the event and Kiefer did the new music video, so where is he and pics? Was there a "Thank you" on Rocco's new CD for her?
Well shes definetly still in the picture.. but how much of that picture is she a part of?...are they just casual?.. does he just see her on occasions ..Why is it he never takes her to any events?.. Maybe it could be her?..that shes not into the fame side as we assumed she was?.. lots of question and no answers!
My 2 cents to the latest pictures: First off, IMO the "relationship" is nothing serious, as she was not by his side at the Walk of Fame and this event meant a lot to him. Moreover the Gorgeous himself said: "I am single". Obviously he took her to the "24" X-mas-Party and offered her a luxurious hotel and an Aston Martin to be driven around. That's what worries me a lot: to me it looks like Kiefer desperately wants to have "someone" in his life and he feels obliged to make "special offers". This Aston Martin is soooo unkiefery. I truly hope he will not change, just because he is close to someone from the superficial fashion business. Maybe gradully Kiefer feels this discrepancy himself and that is why he never looks relaxed and happy with her.
i am not a fan of that girl, i think she is like : "look at me, i'm with Kiefer Sutherland and i'm a former model from Chanel ! " Of course, she's pretty i would not say the contrary ... But i don't think they are just friends and he just sees her on occasions...it 's more than a year now that they have been seen together...Time to tell our Kiefer is not very honest when he says he's single or maybe it's the french journalist who was not very honest, press can tell anything, maybe this one read he was not engaged to her and he has invented this question/answer ? Strange to read he answered to this question about his private life whereas his publicist asked journalist not to talk with him about that.
For using her as a decoy, i don't agree with you, if he would do this she would be next to him in all the last events (24 redemption premiere or walk of fame)and the last pics in San Diego has been done during a "private" moment, i don't think it was a PR thing to be pictured in front of Denny's.
Hoppel I agree with you. I'm concerned he is trying to turn himself into something he is not. Maybe he feels like this is what he should do and keep everyone happy after what he put them through last year.
12.21-I'm wondering that too about the journalist. But, wouldn't he have mentioned her on the talkshows if they were serious?It's all getting very humiliating for Siobhan.Most of his fans hate her with a passion whilst others feel sorry for her because it is looking like Kiefer is "having his cake and eating it" i.e getting sex without the commitment. I think she will come out of this whole thing worse than he will even though I suspect she is trying to manipulate the situation at the present time.He has said he does not want anything serious as he is enjoying himself and his life but she appears to be following him around like a lost puppy.
Anon at 2:05am I don't think it is accurate to say "most of his fans hate her" some sure seem too yes, likewise there are some like myself ( in the absence of any real information ) are quite happy to see them together. I also would guess many of his fans are not aware or don't really care.
Ursula, this woman would have been more appreciated by some of his fans like me if she had been single when she started dating with Kiefer. The fact that she was married during a short time and with a man as Bonnouvrier is not a good sign. Apparently, her divorce with David was too fast, maybe she was afraid to lose Kiefer (who knows ?).
Perhaps, too, we are wrong, Kiefer has strong feelings for her and they fell in love at first sight, it's a possibility too. To see Kiefer with a woman more than one year means something to me. So, even if i don't like her, i think they have a serious relationship and i hope he is happy now.
Maybe this is just me, but..serious relationship? Hello? He has said he is single! The only thing serious about it is that they are likely to be hopping in and out of the sack when it suits. Its obvious to anyone it is not love.Catherine was around for years and he admitted she was his girlfriend and he was still married to Kelly.He gets divorced and they are still hiding out like fugitives? He owes it to his fans to tell the truth so I think we should believe he is single until we hear anything that tells us differently. Her divorce was fast and rather worrying.I do not like the idea of her being on those dating sites either but if thats the woman he wants and she makes him happy well thats up to him.
In my opionion I think it's time Kiefer issued some kind of statement whether in an interview or via Myspace or the like so the whole thing can be dealt with.It's getting way out of hand. His "publicity people" must be aware of the situation but maybe they do nothing because it is keeping him in the public eye whilst making Siobhan look desperate and Kiefer a liar.
JMHO.
5:55 did you hear from his mouth he was single ? me, i don't.
I agree this is getting utterly out of hand.6.29am Ok, we didn't hear it from his mouth but we have also not heard from his mouth that he is anything but single.If he was in love or it was serious as many of you seem to hope it is(maybe you want to be Siobhan yourselves I don't know)then he would have said so.He would be happy about it not looking miserable.Personally I think she has got her talons well stuck into him.Maybe we should get "Free Kiefer" T-shirts printed...Now there's an idea.. and alot more productive than bickering amongst ourselves.
Oh no i would not want to be her but to be at her place next to Kiefer LOL, but i am not a dreamer and so i live into reality.
no need for me to put my name because i think most people who put their names here are not very honest about their real identity.
5:55 who doesn't want to put her name. LOL
Cmon. He was with Catherine on and off for four years and while he was still legally married to Kelly.He saw Catherine only when it suited him and she held on for a long time hoping their relationship would become more ..and now hes doing the same to Siobhan...I mean, I think its odd that we dont see her for a month or so and then she shows up again out of the blue..It make me think they are perhaps an on/off couple?.
7.19 AM You have some good points.Maybe he has told her he can't commit to her because of his busy schedule so they just hook-up when they can.Maybe she is happy with this as she is recently divorced.
Hoppel, you make such a great point. Siobhan seems to get to enjoy the first class Kiefer treatment. You know first class hotels, fancy trips, fancy cars but she doesn't get taken out to be seen with him like at the 24 Premiere even though she lives in NYC and the Walk of Fame even though pretty much everyone else is included but her, interesting isn't it???
As for Kiefer thinking he needs to buy her or anyone I actually don't think it is that. I actually think it's more like Kiefer's ego and yes, he has one, lol at work. I mean he gets to parade around a nice looking woman who seems responsible enough and yet not be fully commited to her.
Btw, I still see posters mentioning her work. She is NOT that important, lol. She is a Style Director for a Fashion Magazine. Why do so many people think this is a life saving job and she can't take off days from work. Do you really think she wouldn't take off one day of work to get to go to the Walk of Fame and what is the excuse for the 24 Premiere. And she wasn't there. There were enough private sightings and pictures don't you think someone would have seen her? Where did he hide her this time in the ladies room??
oops sorry that last post at 8:32 AM was me.
P.S. It must have really blown her mind, LOL when he stopped off at that Denny's to eat. That's not exactly the first class ticket she expects but I suspect Kiefer needed a return to planet earth and a dose of reality for a moment, LOL!!!
He is a big boy and ca take care of himself. He also said he was single cause he is, he ISN"T MARRIED. that means single.
I suspect he is dating this woman and does care for her and that is why he is trying to keep it out of the spotlight, the media just loves to mess with relationships. I have heard him say that he doesn't like when his family or those close to him get harassed by photographers cause they didn't sing up for it. He does look pretty happy in the most recent pics, in fact the only time he looks umcomfortable is when he sees the photogs snapping his pic. I would hate to be out and about, trying to have a somewhat private moment and people snapping pics. I would have a fit. but he is a better person than me, in that respect.
8:37 AM, you make good points but I have said this before too then why did he parade her and this relationship out there at the beginning?? When he did that he was announcing to the world and the paps and entertainment journalists that she was his new girlfriend.
He has been in this business long enough to know that when you do that you bring on what follows.
Now he wants to turn it off. I don't have sympathy for him or her. This is typical of the hollywood set. When it suits their purpose that is to promote themselves or their projects then they want the pictures and when they get tired of it they want to complain.
Just can't have it both ways. Kiefer is no different.
What private moments they are walking on a public boardwalk and parking in a Denny's parking lot.
That's public domain and the paps have a right to it. They are not in his face and I suspect it's probably only one paparrazi not the crowd that Brittany draws. I think Kiefer can handle it, LOL
Oh and btw, so can she. From what I can see of other pictures she doesn't seem to mind the camera much. Afterall she was a model so in fact she probably loves the camera.
what makes me think that they are in a serious relationship is that they are in La Jolla where Siobhan has her family, so Kiefer knows them ... Sorry, but i can't believe they are just friends.
I do agree with alot of your points 9:12 and 9:16, I guess you can't be truly private in public, I meant that it was private in that it was not work related or anything like that. And yes they do have a right to photograph, but it doesn't mean that it isn't irritating. Also, regarding the model thing, I know that it has been said that she was, owever I have never seen any pic and from what I understadn of the business, she isn't tall enough, so I am not sure I am buying that one. (nothing against her, I do think she is atractive) And I was making that comment about being in front of the camera cause so many people say that Kiefer looks unhappy and maybe that is why, just a thought anyway. Now to my big agreement with you 9:12. typical Hollywood set, I get so tired of them, yes even Kiefer, using publicity to get what they want, includeing the best seats free stuff ect. and then screaming that they want their privacy. And I think you are completely correct, they can't have it both way.
To those who think "this is getting way out of hand and it needs to be cleared up"... reality check!!! There are a handful (maaaaybe two handfuls) of you who are being driven nuts by not knowing Exactly What's Going On. It's hardly a national crisis. Where do some of you get the idea that you're owed The Whole Story? You're not. He doesn't have to confirm (or not) anything that he doesn't want to confirm (or not).
Many Kiefer fans (even those who are really really interested in him) aren't desperate to prove or disprove the existence of this relationship one way or another. Many Kiefer fans don't hate Siobhan from afar. That's not the same as loving her. It's "not knowing her and, so, not thinking the worst of her." If some of you hate her, that's fine. It's your business. But it's not a universally held opinion. Truly.
Does anybody else feel that it was strange that suddenly they start to have their picture taken again.It seems odd that they are photographed in San Diego somewhere nobody would expect them to be.Why do I have the feeling that the photog was tipped off?I have also never seen a photo of her from her modelling days and she can't be tall enough as people say Kiefer is at best 5'9" and with those ridiculous boots she always wears she is about the same height. I don't think he dare parade her about as he knows if he does it will then make them "exclusive" in the paps eyes and he doesn't want that.So instead he "blows her mind" as Linda says at Denny's instead! LOL!
As for her "changing" Kiefer...
Kiefer has had more than one "status" car through the years. His little black Porsche for one. The souped-up BMW (as I recall, anyway) that he let the stranger take for a spin from the valet desk (in a recently circulated story, but one that dates back to the mid-90s) for another. Those are just two that I can name from pictures/stories. I'd bet big money that he's had more. There's zero evidence that he bought the Aston Martin because of Siobhan.
There's also zero evidence that she was gutted by going to Denny's. Zero. You can *imagine* that was the case, but you can't know it.
Maybe she's not as much of a snob as the people who posted on Kiefer's Place that they "wouldn't be caught dead in Denny's." Now *that's* snobby.
Yep, Christy, I agree, he doesn't owe us squat. I think he has made that clear, his private life is private, wouldn't want my private life all over the place. And count me is as someone who doesn't hate her or like her, I haven't a clue about her. Some poeplel on other boards are even saying that the new car is because of her, It isn't Kiefery, excuse me but what the hell is a Kiefery car. lol. besides everyone in LA drives a Land Rover, I mean no one out there thinks for themselves. maybe he got tired of being the same and wanted that GREAT looking car. I mean he does have the bucks for it. I just don't undertand why they think that they know what kind of care Kiefer would drive. He is a celbrity and very rich, and all though he may be very down to earth, he is still all of those things. And maybe just maybe the other car has bad memories for him
There are so many new posts here that I haven't read them all yet, but just skimming through (in a rush) right now, just wanted to say...
What you said, ursula. :)
Louise, I agree with you. I actually thought it very odd that they would get photographed at a Denny's and then somewhere in San Diego. Both places seem too remote to me in the paparazzi sense. It's possible that on the Denny's sighting someone in the restaurant called but doesn't that seem strange that Denny's could be on the paps radar; it's hardly a celeb hangout. Also, walking the boardway in San Diego. Btw, notice Kiefer waves on this round of photos something he hasn't done prior with her. Not saying they are staged in the sense of them being together, I don't even think that but I do think it's plausible that the paps were tipped by someone and don't count out Siobhan being the tipper. Everytime he is with her in LA even the most remote scenes like here and Griffith Park they get snapped.
Now we know for certain that Kiefer has been sighted out and about with other ladies over the years yet no paps shots. Always interesting with Siobhan in the picture, hmmmmmm.
"Everytime he is with her in LA... they get snapped."
Really, 10:39am?
So, you're personally aware of every time they've been together and everything they've done and everywhere they've been in LA? Every single thing?
Now, THAT'S interesting...
... and just one other thought (for now) to those who are so hung up on him said that he's single... technically, he's single. And, for all *any* of us know, he considers himself single in every sense of what the word means *to him*... or not. (Contrary to what I've seen posted here and elsewhere, there isn't one solitary definitive definition of "single".)
But, what all those who are so hung up on him saying that he's single conveniently ignore is that, in the same interview, he said that he's learned his lesson about talking about his lovelife publicly. He didn't say, "I've learned my lesson about being seen with women in public." He specifically said that he's learned his lesson about *talking* about it.
So, he's single. Regardless of what the word means to him and regardless of what his and Siobhan's relationship is or isn't, that's technically true. Beyond that, he flat-out said that he's not going to talk about it. So, unless and until he changes his mind about that, I would expect for ALL of us to be left guessing... which is personally fine by me since whether or not he's in a relationship (with Siobhan or anyone else) doesn't impact my actual life one way or another.
But he's not lying or being a phony or any of that. He doesn't owe anyone every detail of his private life.
And again: the self-pleasing "Christy" spoke to us....
What language are you speaking now Christy because it sounds like Bollocks to me
I think you understood my language perfectly, Louise. We just don't agree. Big whoop, right? :)
11:20am, if stating what I think regardless of whether or not everyone agrees with it makes me "self-pleasing", then okay... I'm "self-pleasing."
Wouldn't that make everyone here "self-pleasing", though? ;)
And stop making excuses. Single is single.He knows what it means.It wasn't like he was filling out a credit card application.Nobody uses single like that anymore and you know it.OK he doesn't talk about his lovelife but he can at least acknowledge he has one.He hasn't acknowledged it so to me he is still single i.e not in a relationship.
Excuses for what, Louise?
Obviously, you can think that he's not in a relationship of any kind with Siobhan if you want to. By the same token, I can think that the collective need of some to define "single" as meaning that he can't possibly have any relationship with Siobhan at all is silly if I want to. Freedom of thought is a beautiful thing.
He doesn't have to "acknowledge" anything that he doesn't want to.
If you think he's not in a relationship, that's fine. Just as my thinking that we don't know whether or not he is but thinking it's more likely than not that he and Siobhan have some kind of relationship (and that, if so, he's not being miserably forced into it) is fine.
Neither of us knows for sure... and that's fine too. :) Why does it upset you so much that we disagree? We just disagree. What either of us thinks doesn't have any effect on what the reality is... whatEVER that reality might be.
Single can mean "someone who lives alone" or "not married". If you think he is not with her i respect your opinion but many things prove they have a relationship...she was in the Malibu house and now in San Diego where her family lives. Please wake up ! he seems to like her company and don't tell me like i read on kiefersplace they shared the same bed as good friends LOL.
This post was for Louise.
WHY DOES IT MATTER?, there I feel better now. So what if he is dating her, in love with her, just screwing her, or can't stand her and it is PR(and no, I don't believe that). Why should it matter to us. Boy I havn't had this much fun in a long time. lol.
Christy, hang in there, or don't. Maybe you are just like me and come here for the drama, it is kind of fun in a demented way. lol
Heh, 12:41! The hysterical drama *is* kind of addictive. ;) And, yep, you and I are of a mind about the whole "whatEVER the deal is and howEVER irresistible he is to speculate about, in the end what does it actually *matter* to any of our actual lives?" question. :)
Speaking of addictive, just saw a Defamer sighting (on Benny's) of a sloshed Kiefer at Bar 4100 (one of his old haunts) last night.
If it's true (and it certainly rings true enough in its details), his drinking breaks my heart. No judgement in that; just sadness.
Oh man, I hope he isn't returning to his old ways that scares me, not judging either, I just worry about his health, and I know that from past stories, he does some wild things when drunk. as most of us do, well used to do anyway when young and stupid. Has 24 wrapped yet, casue he seems to get into trouble when not working.
Well, I just read the Defamer things, and yes it sounds true to character. Why does he do this,(if it is true) and for some reason I think it is. He is one a real high right now, much like he was last year before the DUI. I tseems as if he sabbotages himself. That man has some real problems. I am afrain one day he is going to screw up beyond help.
I am surprised that was on a Monday night but maybe no shoot today?
Also, as Christy mentions one of his old haunts which I think was on Vermont and he could walk to it. Let's hope as it doesn't appear that Michael was with him or anyone else responsible enough to drive.
I don't care that we disagree Christy in fact it makes a conversation more interesting if I'm honest. You are entitled to your opinion and I to mine.But you are talking about the "drama" which you enjoy, well you are involved in that so don't belittle others on this site because you are one of us for even coming here.
LOL, the day after a romantic weekend with his woman, he's drunk in a bar trying to get it on with a young couple? Sounds just like a happy contented man to me, NOT!!! I swear you can't make this stuff up.
12:57, imo, he does it because he's an alcoholic... as simple - and at the same time as totally complicated - as that... and, yep, there are few things as ultimately self-sabotaging as alcoholism. Hard & sad to see... even from afar... especially in someone so special.
Linda, you're right that 4100 is walking distance (it's about a mile from IW), but it's not a particularly safe walking neighborhood at night... especially not for someone stumbling drunk... and famous. Yikes! So, yeah, hopefully he had a ride. :)
Louise, of course everyone who's posting here is part of this site... but the drama to which I refer is that around either trying very hard to prove that Kiefer and Siobhan have no relationship or figuring that they do but being terribly upset by that thought... and, no, I'm not participating in either of those things. In any case, glad that we agree that it's fine to disagree!
This reminds me of his being spotted at the strip club in August when his supposed honey had come all the way from NY to see him. Poor ole Siobhan just ain't gettin the dirty job done! LOL
Without knowing what the nature of his relationship with Siobhan is or isn't, the idea that his drinking problem (with its ever-attendant sexual overtones) would be "fixed" by her If He Really Loved Her does nothing but show a tremendous lack of understanding of how the psychology of alcoholism/addiction works (in anyone).
Kiefer has said himself, more than once, that the thing that he regrets most about his drinking is that it hurts the people he loves. Regardless of whether or not Siobhan is one of those people at this point, I believe that's true overall... in terms of him and in terms of other otherwise very well-intentioned alcoholics.
Hey, Linda... meant to say earlier that I'm not sure that it's meaningful whether or not they were shooting/Kiefer had shooting today. For better or for worse, he's reknowned for his ability to make his shooting schedule without fail regardless of his "the night before" condition.
Functional-alcoholic-R-him. :-/
p.s. keep thinking of things that I meant to include earlier... this is in response to 12:53...
They're not quite done with shooting yet. On December 12th, Jon Cassar posted on the FOX board that they had six days shooting remaining, but he didn't specify whether or not that included weekends. We know that Kiefer wasn't shooting last weekend (not that he has to be part of every day's shooting schedule), so I'm guessing they're planning to finish by this weekend or next Monday at the latest.
Is it fair to label him an alcoholic? It's a serious accusation and I'd think twice before using it. A true alcoholic wakes up drinking.Kiefer travels,works hard so what if he gives himself a night off now and again to enjoy himself.As long as he is not driving he isn't hurting anyone.He has paid his dues and I think he knows he messed up last year.When he said he regrets that he hurts the people he loves I can't remember him making a particular reference to alcohol.And I wasn't "terribly upset" Christy just making a point.And I'm glad we agree to disagree.Louise
Based on my own long-term from afar observation of Kiefer and reading/listening to the things that he's said about alcohol and having up close and personal experience with alcoholics (including my husband, who's struggled with the disease his entire adult life, with long periods of sobriety), I believe that he's an alcoholic. It's just my opinion and, in any case, it's not something said as an 'accusation' or with any negative judgement. I don't feel any judgement about someone being an alcoholic. Just sadness and hope for them that they'll find the strength to deal with it if/when they decide that they want to deal with it. It's a tough monster to deal with!
He's specifically said that his greatest regret around drinking is that it ends up hurting people that he loves.
p.s., it's a myth that "true alcoholics wake up drinking."
There are many different kinds of alcoholics, including binge drinkers, which seems to what Kiefer is... and many alcoholics are *extremely* high-functioning in their careers.
Christy I have experience with alcoholism with people I love aswell so you are not alone there.My point is I don't think it is fair for us to say whether he is or he isnt as I feel its a doctors judgement to make.You are right when you say there are differing kinds of alcoholism but many people don't know that and I feel it is not something that we can say he is or isn't.Thats just my opinion of course.Louise
Christy I have experience with alcoholism with people I love aswell so you are not alone there.My point is I don't think it is fair for us to say whether he is or he isnt as I feel its a doctors judgement to make.You are right when you say there are differing kinds of alcoholism but many people don't know that and I feel it is not something that we can say he is or isn't.Thats just my opinion of course.Louise
Fair enough, Louise. I understand what you're saying... it's just another place where we don't agree, though I don't think we're probably all that far apart on this one. :)
... and I'm sorry that you've had personal experience with alcoholism too. Unfortunately, that makes us two members of a very large club.
Sorry I have serious internet problems today. I just feel judging his maybe on/maybe off lovelife/friendship is inconsequential comapared to something as important as his health and a serious disease which alcoholism is.That's why I don't wish to comment on this area of his life.Louise
It does.Its far more common than what people think it is I suspect. Louise
I absolutely agree with Christy, I do believe that he is an alcholic, I have a good friend that is a functional alcholic and was just like Kiefer, it didn't interfere with his work at all and he is very successful, so I am soory to say this but if he is'nt an alcoholic, (witch I can excuse cause it is a disease) then he is just plain stupid, to be out drinking like that with just being released last year for his 4th DUI, and yes I know only his 2nd DUI conviction. but just cause he wasn't convicted doesn't mean that he didn't do it. and I would like to believe that Kiefer is smarter than that, so in short if he isn't an alcoholic, then I have no respect for him.
boy that sounds kind of strange. but I think I get my point across, Alcoholism is a disease and much like any disease you can't judge that person for having it. so that is what I meant by my previous statement.
That's what I was trying to say.it's a disease and needs to be understood.I just didn't feel comfortable using the term without the facts about the person as there are varying degrees of the disease.Louise
Two observations:
In the recent Letterman interview, Kiefer seemed quite adamant in that he saw his "drinking & driving" to be his terrible mistake, not his "drinking." If I remember correctly, Dave gave him several opportunities to admit to a drinking problem, but all Kiefer would attest to was not ever "drinking & driving" again. I think that he believes he can handle the drinking part - not having an addictive personality myself, I'm not sure if he can. It seems that when he does drink, he often prefers to do so in excess.
Secondly, I find it interesting that Siobhan's dad specializes in addiction therapy. Whether there's a tie-in there I surely don't know, but it is somewhat intriguing - at least to me.
Hi lola. Though he's talked about his drinking as a problem at different points in the past (going way back into the '90s and as recently as the Rolling Stone interview - and maybe even since then, though I can't recall off the top of my head), I agree that he's currently in a state of not wanting to talk about it being a problem (at least not publicly; who knows about privately). Of course, denial is one of the most predictable symptoms of the condition.
Like you, I find Siobhan's dad's psychiatric/treatment speciality at least potentially intriguing. At the very least, whatever their relationship is, it may give her insight into (or the direct access to specialized information about, anyway) his situation/behavior.
Christy, to me it is disturbing that you offend people who dare not to be of your opinion, like 'being driven nuts" or "being hysterical." If you could stop that, I would appreciate it.
If you think, Sib is "not snobby" - who is snobby in your opinion? Just look at her style, her clothing, her posture and her body-language, especially in the Malibu-beach-clip, where she was so busy looking after her bikini!
Just a new thought from my part: if he is sooo happy looking with Sib - why was he seen the next night sloshed in a bar (if it is true what Defamer says)? Don't tell me he was so unhappy that she has left that he had to get drunk, lol, lol.
I agree with you Hoppel.
OK ... big qualifier ... I'm going to make observations .. from afar ... without any knowledge of Sib or Kiefer ... without knowing them or their situation .. jmo ... pure conjecture ... GET IT CHRISTY, I'M GOING TO SPECULATE, SO SAVE THE LECTURE ABOUT ME NOT KNOWING THEM!!
Three things I've noticed. First, Kiefer mostly seems to go on a public drunken tear when Sib is around - April 1 hot dog stand, Cheetahs, Spotted Pig, 4100. Coincidence? Of course it could be,but I wonder. Second,as someone above said, it DOES seem odd that a profimedia pap just happened to be somewhere on the highway between LA and SD, at a Dennys. And *then* he was at the hotel in SD, and it was also odd that they would be strolling on such a terrible day, so it could well be a photo-op. third, I agree Christy that people don't stop drinking because of other people in their lives, but I've certainly seen instances where a new person has come into someone's life, and helped turn them around, filling a hole in their heart and making it OK to stop their addiction. That doesn't seem to be happenign here. I don't think Sib makes him miserable, or happy. I don't think she's changed much of anything .... I SAY, *FROM AFAR*
Where is the proof these pictures are recent? Where is the proof they stayed in San Diego at a hotel?Bit difficult to do when you have award ceremonies and parties in LA all weekend.Louise
I don't believe that San Diego is that far from LA but I could be wrong. And Kiefer is used to traveling around.
Morning ladies.
5:30 AM You hit lots of nails on the head in your posts, Bravo!!!!
Hoppel, you make good ones too expecially on the snob effect. She most certainly seems like one to me. First off she grew up in La Jolla a very rich area then she is said to become a Chanel Model (again top of the line) then marries a very wealthy and influencial man in the fashion business and now onto Kiefer where she seems to again be enjoying all of the high life. He certainly is spending on her, lol. I think this is a woman who has become accustomed to the high life and that is what she expects to continue with. That is why I said he probably blew her mind with the Denny's visit. I don't think the fashionistas visit Denny's too often, do you???? And yes, the snob fact also shows out to me in the way she walks and holds her head, etc. This is certainly a "look at me" type.
I also as I stated in an earlier post wonder about the postioning of paps at both the Denny's and the Boardwalk. Maybe someone can explain that one to me cause it doesn't seem so natural. Those are not places paps would be positioned, these pictures will not end up on the cover of People so they aren't worth enough for the paps to be trailing him. No, it would seem to me they were put there. How, I don't know. It's possible Kiefer put them there. Look, I know he's friendly but he is actually waving in one of the. He doesn't seem at all surprised that they showed up even in a place you would think he would expect to be private and then in the Denny's parking lot. I think he knows they are there but again just acts natural.
WARNING, THIS IS ALL SPECULATION ON MY PART!!!
6:33, just to answer your post it is not a long drive between LA and San Diego. I do believe the pictures are from this weekend. I think Kiefer had Siobhan out for the 24 Party which most likely was held on Friday evening then Saturday morning they drove to San Diego stopping at Denny's then staying overnight in San Diego if the hotel check in story is accurate and I believe it proably is. Then Sunday morning drove back to LA and he had plenty of time to make the video awards. Btw, how come Siobhan wasn't included in that or dare I ask that question. I mean she was in LA and he was nominated not just a presenter. Oh well, I guess we will have some excuse for that. I know I do, she isn't serious enough for him, that would also explain the absence from the Walk of Fame. Just a guess on my part!!!!
Linda where did you hear or read that Kiefer stayed at a hotel? Can you explain this? Thanks so much!
Linda, I would like to know where Dazia got all this info from on her site too! Was there a note attached to the pics? She has no source listed. I believe she was the first to get all the beach pics which came from the same source.
Why would Kiefer take her to a 24 party when he has never taken her to any events of 24 since Upfront which was many many months ago. Something is very strange with all of this. If there is no source then anything can be possible and those pics could be old. I have been in LA, SD & Malibu, CA in July and August where the weather got chilly and windy and you needed a coat especially in the morning. Why does everyone believe CA is always sunny and hot! I was freezing my butt off! Thanks EM
8:26 and Linda - Kiefer did not have any publicly scheduled activities either Friday or Saturday.
1. Both the VGA (video game awards) and the 24 Wrap Party were Sunday evening. Kiefer was not photographed on the Red Carpet Arrival - which is pretty typical for him for non-Globes/non-Emmy shows. He only had to be in his seat by the time Eliza Dushku came on to announce. (Just like BIG awards on VH1 where he only was seated during the commercial prior to Eva Longoria presenting.) The live telecast started at 6pm L.A. time and he was off the stage by 6:40...... a couple of backstage photos and he's off to the wrap party.
2. The Profimedia photo service is the source for Kiefer and Siobhan staying at the La Valencia and "stopping for a bite at Denny's on the way down". It is their business to be accurate about the location; they'll lose business if they're wrong in terms of time/place ...... and they have ZERO vested interested in whether Kiefer/Siobahn are a couple or not. They just want photos to sell.
3. Profimedia doesn't specify which "weekend" but the clothes and blustery conditions match weather conditions in the area over the weekend. Could it be another weekend? Possible......... but really improbable. Again, the reason is money. Photos start losing their value immediately. It's the way the business work.
3. Someone who lives in the area has already verified that the location of the walk is by the now condemned life guard tower by the Children's Pool (a very well known landmark). That area is less than 1/2 mile walk - 6 or 7 minutes and 1 turn - from La Valencia.
I also wondered about the date EM, What's to say that these pictures were not taken some time ago and are just surfacing now?Could it be possible that they were not taken by a professional(how many professional photogs do you see at dennys?)But by a member of the public?which may explain why they could just be appeearing now.
Louise
8:54 AM, not strange to me that he would take her to a party. Stranger that he would not take her to the serious formal functions like the Walk of Fame or an Awards Show where he is actually nominated for something. Now that is strange!! And yes, I know the party was strickly private and we are to believe that Kiefer is "downplaying" this relationship for what reason I don't know. He already legitimized it long ago (April 1st to be exact) and I agree with Christy he isn't by any standards covered wall to wall.
And I really don't know where Dazia gets her information only that IMHO she is very reliable and accurate so I am sure it is correct. Also, I do believe the pics are from this weekend.
Margaret, thank you for the information. I would not have thought of the 24 Party and the Video Awards being on the same night.
And I agree with you I think the pictures are accurate.
Thanks again
So was there a Christmas party AND a wrap party? And I agree about the Denny's photos. It's hard to imagine there being any professional photogs stalking that place out! LOL The hotel seems quite ritzy, so maybe they do hang out there at times. Who knows.
What about the pics we seen with Kiefer getting into his Rover at a airport just a little while back. Later they found out they were old pics of him before he lost his licenses.
I believe the new pics of him driving the Aston Martin car are old too. Kiefer's sentencing for getting his licenses back was finishing a 18 months program and it is determine by the court whether he would get his licenses back. If he did recieve his license back before that time period the press and MADD for drunk drivers would be all over the internet and news stating Kiefer got his license back. With the hate mail Kiefer recieved in jail this story, when he does get his licenses back will make "big news" and be all over the internet & TV. Kiefers girlfriend is not news to the public but this will be. MADD is a very determine organization and you better take them serious. The pics are probably from last year 07. Sorry, nice try but Dazia should do her homework before she post something that important to the public. This is the stuff reports and tabs. dream of. If they don't do it, MADD will see to it and bring this awareness to the public. If Kiefer messes up again they want to come down on Kiefer and """the court system""" to enforce stiffer laws for repeat offenders. It is what there organization is about. Its not about Kiefer doing his time for his crime in the states and it is over...like Canada. Its about protecting the public from drunk drivers and the innocent victims we love.
Unless the photog at Denny's was blistering fast on his feet, there must have been at least two of them; one facing the restaurant and another off to the side of it. Otherwise, how would they have been able to capture different angles of Kiefer and Siobhan as they exited the restaurant? I'm referring to the pics taken as Kiefer and Siobhan exited the restaurant and started walking to the car. The camera from the street captured them from the side, but other pics are parallel to them as they're walking to the car. I think there's even one pic of them from behind as they exit the restaurant and start walking to the car. Straight on, and behind, and from street angle, all at the same time. Unless I'm totally confused (which is certainly possible), one photog couldn't cover that many angles. I don't know. Just a thought I was wondering about.
Thankyou 12.46pm. I think you have made some worthwhile points there. I did wonder the date on the pictures myself and without going into it I suspect that someone (SB) is leaking pics to the media still.Anyway I know a couple of people didn't think he was able to drive yet either so this makes alot of sense. Plus he seems bigger in the pics with SB as he was so slim at the awards at the weekend. Thanks again.Louise
When will Ms Bonnouvrier learn...tut tut.
LOL, Alexa. I think you are right so that would mean several paparazzi stalking celebrities at a Denny's. That's new. I just find that to be funny cause it doesn't seem plausible to me. Especially with what Margaret is saying that they probably aren't necessarily even focused on the couple part of the deal. Maybe people in the restaurant have a paparazzi hotline for just this sort of thing. At any rate it's clear Mr. Kiefer knows they are there and you are right Alexa, they get him coming and going, LOL!!!
Anyway, I happen to love the car shots because you could see all the people at the window staring and then probably discussing Kiefer. I am sure they were shocked to see a big star walk in and driving an Aston Martin no less. It's a very funny scene and something I would be doing too!!!
So much conversation here and I'm rushing for now, but just wanted to make one quick response and ask one question...
1) 5:30am, why would you think I'd have any issue with you speculating on what we can observe from afar? I haven't read the content of your post yet so I may or may not agree with your speculation (which is, of course, fine either way), but I did catch the BIG CAPITAL LETTERS MESSAGE to me... and, um, that's all I'm ever saying, i.e., that speculating based on what we can observe from afar is all any of us (me, you, any & all of us) ever is doing. It's only when from-afar speculation is stated as incontrovertible fact that I find myself scratching my head. :)
2) 1:18pm - learn what? (p.s. *waves* because, regardless of whether you do or don't respond to this, I would lay big money that I know who you are. ;))
3:46 - Jude Cole thanked Camillia Kath (aka the first Mrs. Kiefer Sutherland) on at least one of his first CDs. She didn't work on the record or for Jude - although she eventually did "arrange" Jude's meeting Kiefer by hiring him to play at their wedding.
12:46 - Nor sure whether you're just misinformed or if you read incorrect information, but your post about Kiefer and driving restrictions related to his DUI sentence is completely wrong. The 18 months you're quoting is for a state mandated alcohol education program. Under California state law, Kiefer was subject to a mandatory 1 year suspension of his license. Based on the plea agreement, it appears the 1 year was up around November 10th, but it could have been as early as September 25th.
Alexa - There are photographs from two different angles at Denny's because there were - indeed - at least two photographers. The photos originated from two separate photo services.
In terms of the apparent difference in leg size, c'mon gang - all of you can't possibly claim ignorance of the slimming virtues of dark denim. Those outside the States who haven't heard Stacey London wax quixotic on What Not to Wear for the past several years get a partial pass ;-)
I think Alexa is right and this could cause a distraction and why everyone was watching out the windows. It was a staged event and the pic came from the same source as the beach pics. Kiefer isn't that big of a star and stars look different in person.
The pics in my opinion aren't recent because I also have to agree with 12:46 pm that Kiefer can't have his licenses back yet. Have to disagee with Margaret. When he is done with his 18 mo. program he will go back to court and they will determine if he is ready for his licenses. After what MADD did to Kiefer this will be in the papers and in the news. They will use him to get their point across about drinking and driving. This is not over for Kiefer, the state will have him for 4 or 5 years as far as probation.
1:44..You will not change my mind on the fact that she doesn't works for Kiefer. She probably didn't want her job description put on the CD. Someone said she does makeup but that is not true. It is not apart of her job description either. Someone said she was a Editor and this is not true she is a Style Director and she doesn't earn that much money to live in NYC and the location where she is living. She has also done photo shoots in Del Mar, CA and other places. She might have been in that place looking for another photo shoot for Kiefer, you don't know.
I can tell you one of her job desctiptions and that is setting up Photo shoots inside and outside...
BTW...her father lives in NY and she has a stepmother. Her mother lives in CA. I'm not sure if anyone knows this.
Thankyou to whoever posted just before 1.18am and thankyou 1.18 for the info. I think we all know Siobhan's job description by now lol
Isn't it strange that two photo services would be hanging out at a Denny's located somewhere between LA and San Diego? I think it's strange. Kiefer looked genuinly surprised to see them ... but not the Sib-ster. She didn't look the least bit surprised. Hey, just sayin' .....
1:18am - how do you know that her father lives in NY, her mother lives in CA, and she has a stepmother? All of those things certainly are possible, but when you offer things as fact, it's helpful for you to provide your source.
Also, you can think that Margaret is wrong all you want, but that won't change the fact that you're incorrectly understanding the terms of Kiefer's sentence (which was made public and is the source for this fact). The 18 months mentioned in the sentence was relative to the alcohol education program. Period. The only mention of his license in the sentence was the six months revocation. As Margaret said, beyond that, California state law would have mandated a minimum of a one year suspension on his license (again, that's a verifiable fact). There was never any public confirmation as to whether that DMV restriction was for the minimum year or for longer. Given the fact that he was driving last weekend (because no matter how some folks tie themselves in knots trying to prove that wasn't last weekend, imo and I'd put big money on it, the pics are from last weekend), I would guess that it wasn't for longer than the mandatory year. If not, he's in trouble, huh? :)
... and, yes, he's on probation for five years. That's separate from his license suspension.
1:18 - What is this about people hiding behind anonymity? Why don't you believe you can own your opinion?
You can disagree about the license but that doesn't make you correct. Pretty much always, I've found that facts trump opinion. Please actually read the California law (it's publicly available) and the sentencing agreement (also publicly available) to know the 18 months relates SOLELY to the required by law for a second offense alcohol education program. It has absolutely NOTHING (sorry for the shouting) to do with the portion of the law which says there is an also mandatory 1 year suspension of his license. That year has been up for between 6 weeks and 2 1/2 months. I'm not stating my opinion. That's a fact.
The only thing I can think of (please correct me if I'm wrong) in terms of needing to assert - incorrectly - that Kiefer can't be driving now is that it's somehow important - although for the life of me I'm not sure why - to try and prove the photographs from Denny's and La Jolla can't be recent. Based just on his hair and the weather, two facts that can be observed from the photos themselves, it's pretty obvious they're recent.
Also, just a general comment. I keep reading in posts and on boards about these "published" photos. That's just not accurate. Published is when they're sold and actually appear in a .......... publication (newspaper, magazine, web site). Pictures taken by the photo services (wireimage, getty, splash, profimedia ... et al) that they put on their own web site for marketing purposes have not been published.
How many photos of Kiefer and Siobhan have actually been published and seen by the 99%+ of people not looking at photo sites in the last year? I think it's 2 or 3 but certainly less than 5. Whatever their relationship is/was - it's certainly never been very public.
Sorry - I wish I could figure out when it's going to cut off. Margaret continuing from above
Pictures taken by the photo services appearing on their own web site for marketing purposes (to sell them to actual publications) have not, in fact, been published.
For the 99+% of people who don't look at photo services, how many possible published photos have they seen of Kiefer and Siobhan in the past year? I'm thinking 2-3, but certainly no more than 5. Whatever their relationship was/is, it's certainly never been very public. At. All.
Margaret, if not very public which I totally agree with you on why the paps showing up during this circumstance and I don't believe it was staged for pictures. I just believe that Kiefer or Siobhan and I am putting my money on Kiefer tipped them off in some way.
I just don't understand all of the wire photos on this relationship given how it practically never turns up in major entertainment publications and only mere mentions on ET Canada.
It doesn't seem to me that it would be worth their (paps) time to stalk or chase or anything.....
Am I just looney or do you think this is plausible. You sound like you kind of know this business.
Sib's Dad was listed as one of the Top Docs 2007 in San Diego Magazine. His name is Matthew Zetumer and he's part of the La Jolla Psychiatric Associates Medical Group so I would tend to believe he's based in San Diego.
We were saying Margaret that she also could have put the pics out there herself and staged the them, so get over yourself. And their relationship if any has been very public or pics compared to his other woman. You have no clue either whether she works for Kiefer or not. Everyone is just speculating the same as you are.
I also know people who have lost their license for 3 years in CA. It was never stated when he would actually get his license back especially with all of his DUI's and him being on probation before his jail time.
MADD was upset with all of Kiefers DUI's even in Canada. He is a dead duck if he is pull over again for drinking and driving. Who knows if he was driving from the recent sighting.
It was posted on a site from a friend of her fathers and stepmothers who lives down the street from them. The comment was about Siob weight gain since she last seen her. The woman was from NYC. The post came from one of the Photo exhabition Siob went to in NY. I can't remember which one, since it was awhile ago. It wasn't on a Kiefer site. Sorry
12:02, I agree with you that we have seen far too many pictures of Kiefer w/Siobhan (as a fan I don't complain about Kiefer pictures although I prefer 100% the ones without her, LOL) but this is out of line with the other women Kiefer has been with including Catherine who he was with off and on for about 4 years. However, the pictures are making it no further than the internet. They are not making it to the major entertainment magazines or shows. They don't even get to things like TMZ. Basically it's just these wire services.
That's why I question what is being done here. I don't doubt that they are a couple although I don't believe a serious one. I think they are a couple who just enjoy each others company (I think she enjoys his more than the other way around, LOL). In fact, I would compare this relationship somewhat to him and Catherine. But it doesn't make much sense for the paparazzi to be around so much when it wouldn't seem the payout is there.
That would make it seem to me that Kiefer might want this relationship out there for some reason. What I don't know but this sort of goes back to what Suzanne was saying awhile back.
To me it's also consistent with him outing this relationship in April. It's as if he wanted her stamped his "girlfriend" cause whether he says it or not that is always how she is labeled in pics with him. He could be seen with any other woman today and they wouldn't label her that way. But Kiefer legitimized this fact on April 1st and since then we just keep getting what seem to me to be controlled pictures and almost like once a month.
I don't see either Kiefer or Siobahn being dummies so maybe they both agree to be accommodating, who knows. Seems strange but this is Hollywood so I guess not so strange maybe, LOL.
To get back to your post from the other day, Hoppel...
I'm sorry that you're disturbed when I make the observation that *to me* there's a handful or two (certainly not the majority) of Kiefer fans who are "driven nuts" and/or made "hysterical" by the presence of Siobhan. That is my honest observation of the reactions that I see... what with the "wishing she'd just piss off!!!!!!!!!!!!!" and the like, complete with capital letters and growling emoticons and such. And that's not to mention the contortions that are gone through to "prove" that, for instance, these most recent photos couldn't *possibly* actually be recent, complete with exclamations along the lines of "feeling so much better now that that's solved!" once the "proof" is agreed to by everyone in the conversation.
What word or words would you use to describe the expressions of fury and disappointment and related strong emotions that photos of Siobhan & Kiefer set off with this couple of handfuls of Kiefer fans? Seriously.
Regarding my definition of "snobbiness," at its most basic level, I define "snobby" as "looking down on other people." Since I don't know Siobhan personally, I have no idea whether or not she's someone who looks down on other people. Maybe she does but, for all I know, it's equally as possible that she doesn't. Whether or not it is for anyone else, that she works in the fashion business isn't proof that she does to me. I don't find the way that she looks or carries herself to be "snobby". Then again, I don't think Kiefer looks uncomfortable in photos with her either.
Just as I've seen her out and about dressed up, I've also seen her out and about in jeans and a baggy sweater or t-shirt and wearing little or no make-up. I've seen her sitting on a NYC curb (which, of course, got her a quite a slagging off by some Kiefer fans). I've seen her on the beach in a bikini when she's probably not as completely skinny as she once was (i.e., she's carrying a bit of weight around her middle... not a lot... but enough to keep some women I know out of a bikini). If you don't know what she was doing looking at her bikini bottom, you've never bodysurfed in a bikini. ;)
I do think it's snobby to judge a person that one doesn't know by the industry she works in, the clothes she wears, the fact that she smokes (especially hypocritical in Kiefer fans) and rumored-but-not-actually-known "facts" about her personal life.
Also, "I wouldn't be caught dead in a Denny's," a comment that got a chiming in of agreement, is one of the snobbiest-to-me comments I've ever read.
Finally, regarding why Kiefer would be out getting sloshed the Monday after spending a weekend with her, this is my take...
Regardless of what their relationship is or isn't, Kiefer's been drinking - not infrequently to excess - his entire adult life. Whether people are comfortable with the word "alcoholic" or not, he himself has said (in the Rolling Stone interview) that his behavior is that of a textbook problem drinker (i.e., always thinking "I'll never do that again" and then always doing it again). His drinking has been present when he's been in relationships and out of relationships... when he's seemingly in good places in his life and when he's seemingly in bad places in his life... when he's having career success and when he's not. imo, as with all problem drinking/alcoholism, his drinking is a creature unto itself.
All of which is to say that, in my experience and understanding of drinking like Kiefer's, what he's doing and how he's feeling about it on Saturday and a binge on Monday aren't necessarily all that connected... in any way.
That's what makes alcoholism so painful and tricky. As my husband has said to me during times he's struggled with it rearing its head nastily, "if wanting not to do it worked, I wouldn't do it." It's a bear. My heart goes out to Kiefer in his having to deal with it... and I think that's something that you and I actually agree about. :)
12:24pm - oh yeah, I remember that post, but as I now recall it, the poster's family lived down the street from Siobhan's dad and her stepmother in the San Diego area (even though the poster now was in NYC). Could be misremembering, but that's what stuck in my head.
Either way, thanks for the follow-up! :)
Re: when the pictures were taken (not that I ever doubted that it was this past weekend, but I know that others have)...
There's a sign in the door at Denny's advertising the "$4 Weekday Express Slam".
I haven't had any luck posting links here but, if you Google "$4 grand slam", the first hit you'll find is an article on BNET (a food & beverage site) about Denny's launching their $4 Weekday Slam. (For those who don't live in the States, the "Grand Slam" is a Denny's breakfast special that goes way back.) The news release announcing the program is dated October 27, 2008.
Also, Profimedia has updated the date on the photos to December 13, 2008.
Whatever their relationship, Kiefer and Siobhan were together this past weekend. And Kiefer was driving so, evidently, he has his license back.
out of curiosity the person who spotted Kiefer drunk at the bar on Mon night mentioned "physically affectionly talking to a young couple" or something a long those lines. What did he/she mean by that?. .that he was physically touching them?.. it doesnt sound good from someone who had just spent the weekend with his'girlfriend'?..
Christy, I so agree with everything that you said in your last post. Especially the thing about her smoking and it being hypocritical that is so true, and also she is carrying a little weight around the middle, and I find it refreshing that Kiefer isn't dating some perfect model, but some one who I personally think is still atrractive despite not being perfect as some hollywood types think that you have to be. Hope that made sense
7:15 - it means that he was sloshed and that, as ever, he's physically affectionate (not to mention highly sexualized) with all kinds of people when he's sloshed... regardless of what his relationship status is at any given time. That probably hasn't done a whole lot for any of his relationships (as he'd probably be among the first to say), but I can't imagine that it's something that would take anyone who's in a relationship (of whatever kind) with him for any length of time by surprise. It's entirely predictable drunken behavior for him.
Thanks, 7:17... and, yep, that made sense to me. :)
You can go on and on Christy but the ONE thing you don't understand is that "we see them together but we *do not* see them as a couple together" because Kiefer *is not* affectionate with her as he was with Kelly, Tricia or Catherine. Its that simple with some of us!
We *do not* hate her because she is seen with Kiefer. I never felt that way when he was with the other women. He looked really cute and affectionate with them and it made me smile. I love the pics with him and Kelly the most. I believe a lot of us feel the same way. There are a lot more pics of Siob and Kiefer together then him and Kelly and I just don't see the same thing. He looked so cute and affectionate at the award with Tricia too and she couldn't stop smiling and neither could he. That's the Kiefer we see or I do!!
So you can go on and on about them but I will never see them like that. Kiefer is a fun person and he looks totally bored with her. Go back and look at him with other women and you might see it too! I can pick out some if you are interested to see what I see and maybe others.
We understand *especially* by now where you stand in your opinion of them but you really should see our point of view and where we stand or try to understand that it is not hate that we feel for her, not even dislike, it's nothing! It's not fun, it's not cute and it's not affection we see in Kiefer for her.
@ Christy: It is just that I want a normal discussion here, without bashing or offending each other. We two do often disagree, but nevertheless we manage to get along and to discuss. As for Kiefer's drinking, I feel like you do, I am convinced that he has a problem with alcohol and that makes me very sad, because it seems to prove that he is unhappy.
As for naming posters here as "hysterical" and "nuts", you seem to use these words only for the Anti-Sib-Fraction. IMO sometimes the Pro-Sib-Fraction is acting very weird, too (to put it mildly, lol). We just should manage to tolerate each other and sometimes, yes, to have a good laugh instead of getting so excited. Have a nice weekend all of you!
i'm afraid to see how some people are trying to prove everytime we have Kiefer and Siobhan pics that they are not current... (see kiefersplace) and they believe what they want to believe but reality is here : they have spent the last week end together and when we will have other pics of them what will be the comments this time ?
Where is the proof 2.55am that they have spent the weekend together??????
Perhaps some people are wrong about Siobhan and really she is a kind,down to earth person who loves Kiefer for who he is and is not interested in his fame and fortune and he loves her very much.If that is the case and she is so "special" then why isn't he making her more of an importance in his life?Taking her to special events and generally including her?Instead he takes her to Denny's, makes her sit on the sidewalk,walks away from her,ignores her..The list goes on.She seems very low on the agenda to me...
I do believe they spent part of the weekend together. I don't know why we are doubting these pictures.
However, I wouldn't be too pleased if I were her as she was left off the Walk of Fame invite but instead invited to an overnight stay at a hotel, wooohoooo!! Good for her, LOL!!
And please don't tell me that she has to work and she has a job. She can take days off from work. Given that his father and stepdaughter and stepsons were all there don't you think she would have liked to have been included in that? Personally speaking, I would have preferred that to the pricey hotel. Believe me, he can pay any girl to stay at a pricey hotel overnight with him but not every girl gets to escort him to the REAL IMPORTANT events in his life. Think about it, really try.....
I guess Kiefer showed her what he really thinks of her, LOL!!
Christy,personally I think you need to get over this whole God-complex you seem to harbour.I'm not causing an argument intentionally but you seem to ruin every debate people are trying to have here by generally slating them.What "contortions" are you going through to prove Kiefer and Siobhan are an item?Are we or are we not supposed to be discussing kiefer?If anybody is getting worked up it's you.You talk about snobbiness well all you do is look down on people on this site and(other sites)To quote-"What word would you describe to express feelings of fury and disappointment..?" I have one -Christy.
I agree that she gets upset with everyone even the *$4 weekend Slam*. It was nice that Profimedia updated the photos to Dec 13 instead of maybe October 27,2008 when the *$4 weekend Slam* went on special. Maybe Kiefer read about the Ad special and decided to treat her. Who knows!
Siob fathers address is:
Matthew Zetumer MD
*La Jolla* Psychiatric Associates Medical Group
5190 Governor Drive Suite 102
San Diego, CA
Isn't this the location where the photos came from in *La Jolla*? Was he seeing her father that day? I felt it sound *strange* that he met her in July of 07, he gets his DUI in Sept 07 and it just *happens* her father is treating Kiefer for a Psychiatric disorder or his drinking problem. It really is a small world!
Un, what makes you think that her father is treating him for his drinking problem. I don't think that he is. just too close, it may be pushing the ethics boundries, and even if he is, he couldn't give her any info on him, he would loose his liscense. its' called hippa, And they don't play.
Anyone seen any proof that Mr.Sutherland has had his license returned to him yet? And I agree about Sib's father not treating him,it's unethical! I'm sure Kiefer would not feel comfortable with it either. Oh and Christy, highly-sexualised??My God ,where on Earth do you get such words.You are not writing for The Times you know this is a blog for goodness sake layman's terms will be fine I'm sure.
More later, but really quickly to 11:01am...
The proof that Kiefer has his license back would be that he was driving last weekend. The Denny's special means that it wasn't last year and there's no reason for Profimedia to lie about the date on the photos. btw, Kiefer's face generally looks slightly different made-up (as it was at the video awards) than it does not made-up (as it was in these photos). Darker (i.e., made-up) looks thinner than paler (i.e., not made-up).
I agree that Siobhan's father is HIGHLY unlikely to be treating him in any way.
I got the term "highly-sexualized" from my vocabulary. You understood what it meant, didn't you? Good, then. Carry on. :)
12:21am - actually, I DO understand that some of you don't think that he and Siobhan are a couple because there isn't PDA between them and because you don't think that he looks happy when he's with her. I understand that perfectly. And it's fine that you believe that, whether or not I agree with it.
You, on the other hand, have demonstrated (again) that you DON'T understand what I think. Or, at least I don't think you do based on your response. So why don't you tell me...
When you say that you *especially* understand my opinion about them, what is it that you think that opinion is?
Here's another question... if you don't hate her, why do you (or at least some of you - maybe not you, personally... I don't know since so many of you don't sign your names) say so many nasty things about her?
If you just think that she and Kiefer aren't together, why so much anger? Or... why so much anger at just her? If you're going to be angry because they spend time together and you don't think it's a "real relationship", why aren't you angry at him too?
I'm genuinely curious...
Hey, Hoppel! As ever (truly, it's something that you and I just never will see eye-to-eye on, I think), you think I'm "excited" when I'm not. Not agreeing with people doesn't make me "excited" (in a good or bad way); it's just one of the realities of life. I mean, right?! :) And we (I mean, the whole big "we" of humanity) don't always like one another's styles either and sometimes we express that and, in my experience, people generally survive that experience. ;) I mean, surely you've noticed how many nasty things have been said to me on this site... and I'm still standing and fine. ... and, yep, I often have a laugh! As I'm sure everyone does.
As for Kiefer's drinking... in my understanding and my experience, a drinking problem and happiness have a very chicken & egg relationship. That is, the drinking is an attempt to self-medicate something that's wrong - often, I think (and medical science agrees) underlying depression or the like -... and then the drinking itself causes more unhappiness... and that makes it harder to imagine quitting drinking... and on and on... and on. Plus, I genuinely believe that some body chemistries are addictive and that having an addictive personality is a tremendously difficult thing to deal with throughout a lifetime... and Kiefer definitely appears to have a highly addictive personality. As with you, my heart goes out to him and I wish him nothing but well in dealing with his demons. He's a special person and he deserves all the good that life can bring him! :)
8:16 and 8:17am - as I say all the time, I have no idea what the nature of their relationship is (or isn't), but where I disagree with you (and others) is in thinking that it's possible for us to have any idea from where we sit about how important they are (or aren't) to one another... because we don't know the nature of their private interaction.
Further, we don't know whether it's important to him or to her that she go to red carpet events with him. I know that there are many of you who believe that it's absolutely impossible to imagine that going to events like that together could be anything but a big deal to him and/or her, but that's not necessarily so.
Maybe it IS important to one and/or both of them... but maybe it's not important to either of them. Again, I know you just can't imagine that (and that's really fine if you can't and if you don't agree with this at all) but, imo, it's entirely possible that it's not that big a deal to either one of them.
As for the Walk of Fame, *if* they have an ongoing relationship (and I don't know), it's not difficult at all for me to imagine them agreeing that she wouldn't attend.
Maybe the fact that he treats her differently than anyone else we have seen him with that she is special to him?Maybe there is more to their relationship than any of us know and he has kept it quiet because he wanted nothing to ruin that.
Hi Natalie... and *smooches* to you too! :)
Actually, as I've said repeatedly, I don't know that Kiefer and Siobhan are "an item". Where I differ from you and others (but definitely not from all) is that, if they are, that's fine with me. In fact, if they are and it's what he wants, it's really quite good to me.
"Debate" involves discussing a subject coming from differing opinions and trying to point out the flaws in one another's points/arguments... so, truly, I'm not sure how I "ruin" debates by stating my opinions even when they're opposed to other people's.
I think what I think. You think what you think. How am I "looking down on you" by just stating what I think? Are you looking down on me by just stating what you think? Ahhh, now, THERE we might be on to something! ;)
10:13am - I got "upset with everyone" about the $4 Weekday Slam? Uh, no. I provided a fact.
Those photos in front of Denny's were taken some time after October 27, 2008. Period. No question. Given that and given the weather that the California coast was having last weekend compared to the weather it's had any other weekend since October 27, 2008 and given that Profimedia's date for the photos is December 13, 2008, I see zero reason to doubt that they were taken on December 13, 2008. But, even if someone wants to doubt that they were taken on that specific date, there's no question that they were taken after October 27, 2008. The $4 Weekday Slam sign proves that and all that is is a fact. It's only upsetting if facts are upsetting to you. :)
4:53pm - I agree that that's certainly one possibility.
Christy I agree with some of what you have said.I'm at 11.01 btw.I have been thinking about this from both sides and as 4.53 says is it possible that Siobhan and Kiefer haven't been seen at ANY red carpet events because they don't need to tell the world that they are together,are both secure and happy with one another doing what they want away from the public eye? I don't know, as you don't for sure, and as you say we are all only speculating here. Although that could be an avenue we have not really explored. He hasn't been seen with any other women as far as we know for ages.I know that people were saying he was seen with a brunette called Janice but I think it was Siobhan and somebody got their wires crossed somewhere. I don't think Kiefer is innocent in all this I think he has tried to keep his private life away from media glare but it has backfired and caused his fans to become divided.I don't want to criticise him but he gladly takes the money and benefits but then says he is single when clearly he isn't. It makes him look like a liar although I think we all know he is better than that.That is why this woman is disliked because she seems to have this effect on him but he is an adult and maybe he is doing what he wants and some of us should wake up to that.As fans, it is easy to blame other people than Kiefer.He should have come out and introduced her as his girlfriend in April and maybe this could have been avoided.Surprisingly I'm beginning to feel sorry for Siobhan.Perahps we should be angry at both of them?Or we could always just give this all a rest and enjoy the festivities of next week :-)
If I enjoy too many more festivities I am going to be as big as a barn. lol Way too much food going on around here. Sorry just had to post something without you know who and you know who being named.
lol :-) Think I'm already as big as a barn-or at least feel that way!I'm sure you know who & you know who will be enjoying the festivities so I think we all should too :-)
sounds good, bring on MORE FOOD. I will diet next year.
LOL Christy. Why am I not surprised that you would agree with what 4:53 said, and actually do it in just 7 words! LOLOL
How transparent you are.
Whatever ... to whoever mentioned that maybe they agreed she not come to the walk of fame thing, why on earth would they make such a pact? Seriously, I fully agree none of us knows for sure what their deal is, but if this is how he treats someone he really cares for, God help anyone he doesn't like.
Maybe she's his paid escort and only gets to go where he deems her presence necessary.
Hope everyone has a joyous and healthy holiday season and eat all you want. You can diet after, LOL!!!
As for Kiefer and Siobhan I just wanted to address one issue - The Walk of Fame and the possibility of Kiefer and Siobhan agreeing for her not show up. That's what they might do for the usual red carpet events. I get that and understand that they may not want to come out officially at these types of events. This was not one of those types of events. This was a life event for him. That's why his family and friends came along for the ride.
I think people here would probably agree with me that this was probably one of the single most important days in Kiefer's life outside of weddings, the birth of Sarah. Certainly in his career.
We know he had pretty much everyone who mattered to him in his life at this event with a few exceptions. I believe his mom still has visa issues and Sarah is more than likely in finals. Also, I think even if mom could come she would have left this day for Donald and Kiefer since she had her moment at the Canada Walk of Fame.
We have been informed here and there that these two have been together for somewhere around a year or at the very least since Feb '08, not a new couple for sure. Siobhan is not a novice like you or I. She is a person who is in the business more or less. She works at a beauty and celebrity magazine. Celebs pose on Allure's covers all the time. She knows how to handle these things. Yes, she may not always want cameras following her although personally I don't think she minds at all but we could debate that another day. We know that Jude Cole and Rocco Deluca were both there and yet with all the pictures they managed to stay in the background while still participating in their dear friend's life.
When two people care and love one another they participate in each others life. They do not make agreements not to for any reason..just my take!!
And that is all it is, just my take. In the scheme of things it won't matter what we think but it's just one person's opinion...in my mind it's just another hollywood couple acting weird. They do things different there in hollywood, LOL!!!
Isn't it funny how Christy doesn't know anything about Sib from "afar" but knows everything about Kiefer - of course also only from "afar" - p.e. "how he's physically affectionate (not to mention highly sexualized) with all kinds of people when he's sloshed..." and that this is "entirely predictable drunken behavior for him"?
How do you know this, Christy - by standing next to him for a few minutes (while even your camera striked - I wonder why....) LOL!
Anna, BRILLIANT post!!! You said so beautifully what many (myself included) have not been able to do. My thanks to you.
I agree brilliant posts above.The star was one of the greatest things to happen in Kiefer's life.Siobhan wasn't there,I think we have our answer.Christy,why do you insist on speaking to me(and others)like we are kids?I don't need a textbook answer for everything.You have a grasp on the English language-I get it!but is it necessary to take up your entire posts with lecturing us all?This weekday slam,does this just happen at Christmas and is this the first year it has happened,I'm confused.How is that proof?
In defense of Christy, however she can defend her self much better that I can, we can al know things "from afar" about Kiefer cause he has been written about for 20 + years now, he is a celebrity, Siobhan isn't, so nothing much is written about her, and She hasn't given any interviews that I have seen, and Kiefer has and has revealed many things about his life in the past, probably more than he intented to. And lets use common sense, last year at Christmas he wasn't driving, he was busy in another, different not so good place.
LOL - show me the interview Kiefer said "how he's physically affectionate (not to mention highly sexualized) with all kinds of people when he's sloshed..." and that this is "entirely predictable drunken behavior for him"....LOLOL!!!
5:52am, I do agree that what 4:53 said is a possibility (that is, maybe or maybe not... but, imo, one of the possibilities out there) and I said so. I'm not sure what's so LOLOL-worthy about that.
I also don't know what it is that you think you're "catching me" with. I've said before that my gut feeling is that they do have a "real" relationship of some sort (without having any idea what all the private ins & outs of that might be) and that, if they do and if it's what he/she/they want, I'm happy for him/her/them. That's no secret.
That's my *gut feeling*... but I've also said, repeatedly, that I have no way of knowing for sure what the nature of their relationship is or isn't.
You haven't "seen through" anything. What I think has been and will continue to be right out there in public. :)
To everyone who can't at all understand how it could be possible that Kiefer and Siobhan could have a "real" relationship and they could have agreed that she not be at the Walk of Fame thing...
I get that you can't imagine it. I really do. And I don't think that there is any way that I could say why it's equally crystal clear to me why they could have (not that I know for sure that they did, of course) made that agreement. That the reason is so clear to me and so, I understand, impossible to imagine to you goes to the very core of how I perceive relationships vs how you seem to (based on your posts)... and how I perceive what Kiefer has said, through the years and recently, about relationships as well. If (and I don't know, I'm just saying 'if') they're trying to make a go of something serious, it's just extremely easy for me to imagine them deciding not to take the step of having her at something like that at this point.
The real bottomline to me is that, though I truly don't (as none of us do) know the precise nature of their relationship, her not being at the Walk of Fame was just in no way a "there, that proves it, there's no relationship" thing. I get that there are some of you think that's nuts (though, just for the record, there also are others who agree with it) and that's okay with me. :)
The LOLOL Christy was because you said something in just 7 words.
We all now know how you feel. You have made your point over and over. The funny things is that no matter how it eventually turns out, you can sort of claim you were right, because you basically claim that almost anything can be true and you will be happy with whatever it is. That was why ealier in this blog I said something about wondering why you kept coming back here to participate in all this. It's certainly your right, but most of your posts here seem like lectures. The point here is we are all speculating, and no matter what we say it's pretty much a given that you will come back and tell us how it really is.
To comment on your last post about the walk of fame thing. If they are really serious about one another, then I truly believe they are both nutcases and deserve one another.
Hi Natalie. I write like I write and I always have. As for "textbook answers"... if you mean, "answers containing factual information"... hey, I'm guilty! I like facts. :)
I also enjoy the irony of you lecturing me about lecturing... ;)
As for the $4 Weekday Slam... no, it's not a Christmas promotion. It's a promotion that Denny's (which is a large national chain) launched for the first time in late October of this year. Posting links here hasn't worked for me, but if you Google "$4 grand slam", the first article that pops up is about them launching it. The article is on a food & beverage industry site and the article is dated October 27, 2008. If you Google, "$4 weekday slam", you get a different hit (dated October 20, 2008) about it becoming available soon.
It launched in late October 2008... for the first time. The sign in the window irrefutably places those photos sometime after late October. Besides that, the weather *strongly* suggests last weekend and the Profimedia date is December 13th.... but the fact that stands as undeniable is that the photos were taken sometime since late October of this year.
10:39am, yep, that's exactly it re: how much more we can/do know about Kiefer from afar (lots!) than we do about Siobhan (almost nothing). :)
10:49am - we don't just have interviews with Kiefer to give us from afar information about him. We also have the many many many through-the-years sightings of him/personal encounters with him when he's out and about.... and patterns of his behavior (when drunk, when sober and many places in between) definitely have emerged from those sightings/encounters.
11:05am - ... and you and those you feel as you do haven't made your points over and over? ;)
I'm just expressing what I think... which, yes, is that ultimately I/we don't know the nature of their relationship with one another. That's not about "hedging my bets so that I'll be 'right' either way" (in fact, that never occurred to me until you posted it just now); it's just my for real opinion.
I continue to follow Kiefery conversations because Kiefer fascinates me (a lot! :)). I participate in the conversations - saying what *I* think and observe (which, yes, often is different from what others have posted here; which is not to say different from what some other, less post-y than me, Kiefer fans think) ;))... just as you do.
I truly can't believe that you really think that, because I don't always (okay, hardly at all) see things the same as you (and some others) do, I shouldn't post what I *do* think... I mean, right? :)
11:10am - if that's how you feel, that's how you feel. :)
No Christy. I was simply making an observation. And with this post I am going to take leave of this conversation. I've had enough.
12:33 - in what way did I deny that you were making an observation? How you see something and think/feel about it *is* an observation. But... okay.
Hi Christy (and everyone else) to be honest I'm kinda getting worn out talking about her because I just don't think she is/or this is worth everybody falling out over.We are Kiefer fans above everything else.I don't think anybody expected it all to get out of hand as I feel it has now.We are all different and have different opinions and I will say Christy to your credit that you stick by your opinions but at some point you have seemed to have "lectured" as I probably have too so if it's OK with you lets agree to disagree and lecture eachother when there is something new Kiefery to discuss!I'm sure there will be something new to talk about next week but I'm really feeling like retreating right now as it's gone on forever!I understand many think that because we have seen them pictured so much they are together but I'm from the side that he has said he is single so he is.Who knows it's a 50/50 chance either of us are right/wrong.Anyway I must be either tired/in a good mood but I'm sick of it so I reckon a truce is the way forward!It is Christmas after all lol :-)PS Sorry gals if that sounded like a lecture,it really really wasn't..X
(Though I think that all conversations about everything Kiefer-related will be ongoing here always - as we all agree that they should be on a thread devoted to discussion about Kiefer & Kiefery things :) - and that people won't always agree and that that's fine), I also think...
Exactly right, Natalie! It's the holidays - not to mention Kiefer's birthday today - so I'd love to enjoy the season with one and all too!
Happy Happy Birthday to Kiefer!!!!!
... and Happy Holidays (whatever holidays you celebrate and wherever you are) to one and all here!!!
:D
Glad we are in agreement about something Christy lol.Happy Birthday to Kiefer and Happy Christmas to everybody else:) Also I'm loving this new word Kiefery! Don't know where we got if from but yes definitely we should always be open to discussion about him.Natalie
This is my first time posting but I a glad that you are calling a truce on this subject. So much effort has been expended on this subject. Let's get back to discussing our blue-eyed boy and agree to disagree on the subject of their "relationship" whatever it may be.
I have some other info that I find on the internet about her father Matthew & that he & her exDavid went on a expedition to Mt. Bona,Alaska mountain climbing together in 06. I remember Kiefer going on a mountain climb in 06 with some friends from 24. I can't remember but the person in the article was George Dunn & I thought this guy was the same one who went with Kiefer on his mountain climb. I wonder if it is possible that Kiefer met her father back in 07 to get treatments. I also remember some people saying from 24 Kiefer was there but was never ready to start work because of him being hung over from drinking & I remember sightings where Kiefer was hanging on street corners druck etc. Kelly also filed for divorce in 06, I was wonder whether Kelly asked him to get help. If Kiefer did get help back in 06 or 07 he wouldn't get it in LA because of people finding out so he goes to another city to get it. Makes sense to me. Since everything is possible in Kiefers life why not this? Another reason to be in La Jolla, SD.
I also found out that her brother is Joshua & he is a screenwriter,he wrote Villain after graduating from USC,a psychological thriller about two brothers at odds in Alaskan wilderness. The script scored him an agent & his career is off & running. He said his parents are both shrink & grew up in a upscale beachfront community just outside of S. Diego. He sold Villain to 2929 Entertainment.He also "successfully" pitched his take on Infiltrator starring Leonardo DiCaprio which is like a James Bond flick. Interersting would you say? It said he would like to get into writing Sci-fiction, Age 26 & this article was June 21,07.
My post is above *Happy Birthday Kiefer and Happy Holidays to All*
I'm @ 8:15pm and I would like to add that her father does have a place in NYC. There is also a *SZetumer* and that is a Samuel Zetumer so it might look like Siobham name. I don't know who Samuel is but he went to Princton State College. I don't believe it is a brother but I'm not sure because he wasn't listed with the mother who is Adaline E. Corrin. It could be a step brother since she has a step-mother who lives in NYC. I believe Princeton is in New Jersey.
very interested 8:32 but who cares about her father, her brother or her step brother. Sorry, but what are you looking for ?
Her sister works for ABC news so they are obviously a media family. I think what 8.32 is trying to say is that this relationship could be a working relationship but lets not go into it all again.lol,But it's a possibility?Natalie
Natalie, i don't believe it's a working relationship. But you're right lets not go into it all again.
Siobhan has a sister? I thought she had two brothers...
step sister I think
Ah, okay. Do you know her name? Just curious... thanks! :)
Hey Christy, wasn't her sister pictured with her in those wedding photos that were posted. I think her name was listed there. Blond lady. I think Penny had those pics on her site but don't know how far back.
Oh! Y'know, I don't think I ever actually saw those pics; just heard about the article. I'll take a look for them later. Thanks, Linda. :)
I do think, based on that entry in his alumni newsletter, that her dad just has Siobhan and two sons... so, if a sister, it must be a stepsister.
Hilary Lebvre?
They could be half sisters. If any one is interested you can see a picture of Siobhan at Hilary Lefebvre 's wedding at the website inside weddings. I don't think you can put links here, i tried before and my comment was not posted. search under March in the " real weddings " section and it's the first to come up. There is a group picture with Siobhan amongst the 14 pictures
Thanks for the info Ursula.Btw, not sure who mentioned MADD and that they would be all over if Kiefer had got his license back but I happen to know for a fact that they do not track that kind of info.Not that that necessarily means anything of course.I would think that they would only become interested if he broke the terms of his sentence, there are afterall unfortunately more drunk drivers around for them to deal with.
I'm at 8:32 pm****I put the info out there to talk about something different, to see if they met through her father, David, brother or the apartment since everyone was fighting about the same stuff. I also hear that they met through Kim Raver.
Its some info that others don't know about. That was my point! Her brother Josh sounds interesting for being so young and his career took off around the same time Kiefer met Siob. The mountain climbing article was interesting also since Kiefer did the same thing I think, in Dec of 06 but the Mountain Guide George Dunn wasn't with Kiefer when he went, it was with a different Guide.
Just looking for a connection on how they met, nothing to fight about there I hope.****
Oh BTW...thanks Ursula for staying with the change in topic and the info. I would like to read it. Thanks****
Kiefer didn't mountain climb. He heli-skiied. Two very different things.
Ahem..Why can't he do both? And 5.41 I agree with your post.
ski mountaineering climb and heli-skiing is almost the same thing except one is going up a mountain(mountain climbing) and the other is coming down the mountain. With both a helicopter is usually needed to drop them off.
Siobhan ex and father went up, Kiefer and friends came down. They both need a professional mountain guide with them.****
It would have been favourable if they had taken Siobhan up and left her there... Joking of course..:)
Hi Ursula thanks for the info on Siob stepsister if you go to google where you sent me...down the page you will see Nytimes Hilary Lefebvre, Jake Perry, the article is about her mother and family. I believe all of the brothers and sisters are step to Siobhan. It appears her mother might have married 3 times if I have the right one.
Michela Gallagher is a chairwoman of the psychological and brain sciences department at John Hopkins from Baltimore, MD. who lives by the Baltimore Harbor and who has other children with the last name Gallagher. I was curious of the age difference with her brother Josh but I believe he is a stepbrother now too.
Michela Zetumer and Matthew Zetumer San Diego,CA
Michela Lefebvre and Mark F. Lefebvre Raleigh, NC
Michela Gallagher and ??? Baltimore, MD with 2 children Madeline 30 and Matthew 29 living in household.
Looks like Siob is loaded with step brothers and sisters if I have the right mother.
Her father Dr. Matthew R. Zetumer may have married Dr. Adaline E Corrin (Siob stepmother) and this is where Josh comes in when he stated he was raised by 2 shrinks for parents both working at La Jolla Psychiatric Associates Medical Group in San Diego.
Samuel Zetumer lives at 22 13th St., NY who was at Princeton and younger then Josh.
Just thought it would be interesting to find out a little bit of who Siobhan is.
Hi Ursula thanks for the info on Siob stepsister if you go to google where you sent me...down the page you will see Nytimes Hilary Lefebvre, Jake Perry, the article is about her mother and family. I believe all of the brothers and sisters are step to Siobhan. It appears her mother might have married 3 times if I have the right one.
Michela Gallagher is a chairwoman of the psychological and brain sciences department at John Hopkins from Baltimore, MD. who lives by the Baltimore Harbor and who has other children with the last name Gallagher. I was curious of the age difference with her brother Josh but I believe he is a stepbrother now too.
Michela Zetumer and Matthew Zetumer San Diego,CA
Michela Lefebvre and Mark F. Lefebvre Raleigh, NC
Michela Gallagher and ??? Baltimore, MD with 2 children Madeline 30 and Matthew 29 living in household.
Looks like Siob is loaded with step brothers and sisters if I have the right mother.
Her father Dr. Matthew R. Zetumer may have married Dr. Adaline E Corrin (Siob stepmother) and this is where Josh comes in when he stated he was raised by 2 shrinks for parents both working at La Jolla Psychiatric Associates Medical Group in San Diego.
Samuel Zetumer lives at 22 13th St., NY who was at Princeton and younger then Josh.
Just thought it would be interesting to find out a little bit of who Siobhan is.
Hi Ursula..thanks for the info on Siob stepsister. If you go to where you sent me at google Nytimes Hilary Lefebvre, Jake Perry there is another article on the family.
Siobhan mother is Michela Gallagher who I think has married 3 times. She is a chairwoman of the psychological and brain sciences department at John Hopkins in Baltimore, MD.
Michela Zetumer and Matthew Zetumer San Diego, Ca (Siobhan)
Michela Lefebvre and Mark F. Lefebvre Raleign, NC (Hilary Lefebvre)
Michela Gallagher and ??? Baltimore, MD with 2 children listed in household Madeline 30 and Matthew 29.
It looks like Siobhan is loaded with stepbrothers and stepsisters. I got curious because of the age difference with her and Josh.
Her stepmother must be Dr. Adaline E Corrin and is married to her father Matthew. They both work at La Jolla Psychiatric Associates Medical Group in San Diego, CA. This must be where Josh comes in at when he stated he was raised by 2 shrinks for parents. I believe he is Siob stepbrother.
Samuel Zetumer (SZetumer) lives at 22 13th St., NY the one who was at Princeton and younger then Josh. Maybe another stepbrother.
I just thought this was interesting information into Siob background.****
Linda, I thought you had asked me a really good question I didn't have time to answer and finally had a chance to go back and search the thread on your name. It was on the 18th and you said "... don't understand all of the wire service photos on this relationship given how it practically never turns up in entertainment publications and only mere mentions on ET Canada".
I know it seems like there's a "lot" of mentions but you need to look at which wire services are - and aren't covering him and when. Think about where the pictures come from. They're almost always from profimedia or another European agency. Kiefer is a much bigger star abroad (and in Canada) in terms of general public interest than he is in the States. Where did the most extensive coverage of the Walk of Fame surface? A German publication. There was a TV Guide picture and about 30 seconds on Extra here. That's about it. Your observation about ET Canada was dead-on. Contrast that with those snippets almost never being covered by ET in the States.
In the U.S. Kiefer doesn't "sell" copy and is rarely covered by WENN and Splash - the two major agencies for U.S. tabloids. (Continuing below)
Margaret, thanks so much for taking the time to respond and that is so imformative. I guess that also explains why he always seems to be featured in Hello as well as compared to say "People".
I still have some feeling that maybe Kiefer is somehow "tipping" off the agencies just to get this relathionship out there for all sorts of reasons because it just seems like so much and in all types of instances but given your explanation maybe not. It did seem strange to me that photogs would be waiting at a Denny's on a highway between LA and San Diego unless they had a tip from somewhere cause they seemed to be there when Kiefer arrived so it couldn't come from someone at Denny's unless as Alexa said earlier they are speed demons, LOL. Even at this exclusive hotel in San Diego and just from my perspective he almost doesn't seem surprised to see them when he comes around that bend on the boardwalk. I just figured given that it is described as a "romantic getaway" he wouldn't be as thrilled or he would maybe be surprised to see paps but I also keep in mind that Kiefer is generous with his access and time no matter the situation and I do appreciate him for that.
Thanks again Margaret.
Margaret, thanks for the insight. Another wire service that covers him is Keystone.
It's always helpful when people like yourself and Suzanne, the PR lady add perspective and insight.....Thanks again.
Pretty much his only coverage on Getty and Wireimage is from staged "events" - red carpet, opening, premieres. Splash picks up some 24 location shoots and WENN very little here and there. If you compare the number of photos on the photo sites, I think you'll find the total number, by comparison, is actually not very big.
For Kiefer, when something is covered on one of those services that's an exception, you can pretty much guarantee there's a quid pro quo going on between Kiefer's publicist and the agency.
Easy, brand new example - The photo of Kiefer with the FAO Schwarz greeter (toy soldier). I hope no one really believes a Getty photographer just happened upon Kiefer a couple of weeks ago and said, "Would you mind...."
The other most obvious this year example are the plethora of posed still photos of Kiefer at the beach (as opposed to the videos and other captured without interaction stills). So what was the key? Several of the U.S. magazines and tabloids were going to run "Best Of"/"Worst Of" beach bodies and this was a way to get some good exposure............ so to speak ;-) And if anyone looked at the comments (from regular readers as opposed to those who were interested only because of Kiefer) when those issues came out and Kiefer had a "Best Of" photo included knows it worked was worth the time. They were very positive but there was also an element of surprise in terms of "Who knew he was that hot/looked that good" to them. And that ends up being useful when your agent turns around and wants you to be considered for a role where the suits might not be thinking of you because of their assumption that the "public" doesn't perceive you in a certain way.
.... still haven't figured out the whole maximum length part. This is still Margaret. Whoever said Keystone should have been included - you're absolutely right.
Starting from "Who knew he was that hot/looked that good" - because really, can it be said often enough ;-)
And agreeing to that "beach" press ends up being useful in the future if/when your agent is working to get you considered for a part where you might not be what the suits think the "public" might not buy you in. You can say - "Hey, he can play the romantic lead."
As for Siobhan and Kiefer's trip down the coast, I certainly don't think they were tipped to the Denny's. (Now tipped in general is completely speculative on anybody's part.) But whether it was coincidence or a tip I think they just saw them leave from Ironworks or wherever followed them to see where they went.
All of the photos from Denny's are of them coming out. Followed them off the exit ramp. Couldn't get set up to take any of them going in. Waited for them to come out. Followed them to hotel.
I'm obviously late (apparently by many months) to this thread. In trying to find Linda's December 18th post, I saw a couple of other things on which I wanted to comment.
1. I haven't a clue about what Kiefer's relationship is or is not, was or ever was with Siobhan. But Kiefer is not Jack with a gun held to his head. If there's a business/professional element to it, he's not operating with a level of ongoing perceived discomfort because there are too many other alternatives. If you've got a pebble in your shoe, you don't keep walking with it for a year. You stop and remove the pebble or you change shoes.
And based on past history, I'll continue in another post.
2. The significance - or not - of Siobhan's not being at the public portion of the Walk of Fame. Important if she was there? Probably. But, it's incorrect to assert that her absence is of equal significance.
Two examples. One is a timing thing because the story broke at the same time as Kiefer's Walk of Fame ceremony. There is a country music star named John Rich... although probably not known to those living on the coasts or in Europe. He was the bass player/vocalist for Lone Star, is part of the duo Big and Rich, is a judge on the CMT show Nashville Star and hosts another CMT show called Gone Country. He just got married a couple of weeks ago which surprised a fair number of people who didn't know he had a serious relationship.....
His now wife, Joan, is a former model who now owns a modeling agency in Houston. According to people and as covered by AccessHollywood and others, "The couple have been dating for five years and prefer to keep their relationship out of the public eye and a family source told People that they do not appear together at official events or on red carpets."
2a. The second example should be pretty obvious: it's Beyonce and Jay Z. In the beginning of their relationship, neither of them would confirm or deny they were a couple. After a period of time and many tabloid pictures of the two together, they could no longer deny they were together, though the couple still refused to speak publicly about their relationship. They never appeared together at premieres or on the Red Carpet. There might be a photo of them at a basketball game, but there wouldn't be any pictures of them either arriving or leaving together.
Beyonce was quoted saying, "I don't deny it. I just don't talk about it. We've never talked about us and it's kind of protected our relationship. I think it's kept us out of tabloid drama. A lot of actresses that have had successful relationships don't talk about them, so neither do I".
Of course after six years of denying or not talking, they got married in April.
The point is NOT that I think Kiefer and Siobhan are serious and/or about to get married. Neither of them are talking about it and until/if they decide to, none of us will know.
But the Walk of Fame ceremony can not be used as concrete evidence or proof that it's over/not serious/not real/whatever. It's just not how that world works.
To December 18th "12:02" - Do you have a name?
"I know people who have lost their license for 3 years in California."
.... and your point is what? We're not talking about "people". We're talking about the legal facts about Kiefer's DUI sentence.
"MADD was upset with all of his DUIs even in Canada."
I'm sure they were. (Yes, I'm familiar with their comments about Kiefer's contract with Ford Canada). But, again, that's irrelevant. They have no legal standing in court, and that's the issue being addressed.
Finally, "... it was never stated when he would get his license back especially with all of his DUIs..."
Legally, Kiefer has a record of two DUIs. Both his 1989 and 1993 DUI arrests were plea bargained to reckless driving. His 2007 arrest was considered a 2nd offense. However we do, in fact, know when Kiefer could get his license back. As I previously stated, it's not an opinion. You just have to look at the sentencing document. This conviction carried a six month suspension of his license not to conflict with any state rules. The state rule (1 year for a 2nd offense) trumped the six months. The ONLY question is when between September 25th and mid-November - when it was stated he had to surrender his license - the year began.
.... Carrying on
The only question is when between September 25th and mid-November (the latest date for surrendering his license) the year began.
These are facts. The documents and relevant law are both publicly available.
3. One final thing I noticed in going through posts trying to find Linda's question and have seen on other boards. It's the statement that Siobhan's original career was a model and/or she was a "Chanel model". There have been some other statements questioning that saying there don't seem to be any pictures of her as a model, but "Siobhan was a model" has been stated so often, it just seems to have been presumed to be true.
Well - those who questioned it were onto something. Siobhan was not a model. By 2000, she'd already been working long enough to be a sittings editor for Cosmopolitan as Siobhan Zetumer.
So - how did this get started? In late 2000, Chanel started a new campaign for their Allure (a little irony) fragrance line. They had always used "real men" for their Allure Homme fragrance for men and decided to carry that them over to the women's brand.
"So out with the models and in with the 'civilians' for the latest campaign for Allure, which includes print ads for each line and the first television commercial for both."
The ads for the women's line carried the headline, "Every woman has her own special allure" The women chose were "... a ballet dancer from Paris, a magazine editor from Paris, a women's rights activist from Somalia, a sculptor from London and a fashion stylist from New York".
Anyone want to guess who the fashion stylist from New York was ;-)
"An increasing number of marketers like Chanel have been shifting their campaigns to include 'real people' with interesting faces rather than featuring celebrities or attractive models..."
"They're not professional models and that's exactly the reason why they were chosen."
Okey doke, heli-skiing and mountain climbing are "almost the same thing" because they're both done on a mountain. Same with, say, scuba diving and deep sea fishing. Both done in the ocean, after all.
;)
Yes, you need a guide to do both... but, no, they're not almost the same thing. I don't know how Kiefer and SIobhan met, but the fact that her father and ex mountain-climbed together and Kiefer heli-skiied is unlikely to be the answer. :)
Date correction: The campaign actually began in 1999 - not 2000. The women chosen were "... a ballet dancer from Paris, a magazine editor from Paris, a women's rights activist from Somalia, a sculptor from London and a fashion stylist from New York".
Anyone want to hazard a guess at who the fashion stylist was?
From an article in The New Strait Times:
Q: How was the casting decided?
A: We looked all over the world for 'characters' and chose about 30 before settling on these six young women.
Q: What was their common factor?
A: What they all have in common is charisma, a real individual 'quality', a certain strength. What won us over was their independence, their personality, their commitment to their work or to a cause.
Q: How were the actual shoots?
A: It was very refreshing to work with these women. This was a first for them. They brought immense enthusiasm and spontaneity to the experience, and didn't take themselves too seriously."
WOW! Margaret, you are a wealth of information and thankyou very much for taking time to write here. Are you a journalist or something ?Cos you should be :) I had a feeling that she had never modelled or it had been very low key.It just seemed very strange not to see any photos.Thanks again
Hi Margaret, I also saw the article about the Chanel ad campaign and the bits and pieces about Cosmopolitian. It does seem to answer some questions, and to me anyway it makes her a more interesting person.
LOL Christy I agree with you. Your post just made me laugh thanks:) I think I know what you mean Ursula but it has been widely reported in the media that Siobhan was a Chanel model and there is abit of a difference between the two to say the very least.I'm not intentionally trying to be offensive there but it is alittle misleading.:)
So basically he is full of S***? That's what it sounds like to me. Why say he is single?It just makes him look bad and pisses people off,regardless of whether he cares about his fan's opinions or not that's what has happened. I actually feel sorry for Siobhan. He is a talented guy and it seems a nice person but I think this is turning into a mess which he(or his people) have caused themselves.JMHO
Margaret, i don't think he doesn't talk about Siobhan because he's gonna marry her, i just think he doesn't want to mix his work and his personal life. And i don't see him telling her not to come to the walk of fame to avoid people to see them together, it's stupid. They went to two exhibit together in NY and they have been pictured during those parties.
Kiefer knows that press has understood who Siobhan is in his life, i don't think he needs to hide her even if it's serious.
Margaret you are comparing John Rich and Beyonce who are 2 super stars compared to Kiefer. Beyonce is way up there on the scale of a celebrity but like you said she "didn't deny" her relationship with Jay-Z. Kiefer has deny his relationship, when he said he was single and having fun! Kiefer is not big like Beyonce, he could have kept Siob out of the public eye like he does his daughter most of the time but he didn't do that with Siob. There was no reason to keep her away from 24 Africa exhabition or the Walk of Fame because both events were private, held off by fans and paps once inside. It looked like he had another girl with him at those events.
You also forgot to mention that there are ways to bring awareness to the public eye about celebrities and that is 1...acting up (like Kiefer jumping into the xmas tree & drinking) to get attention in mags, 2...a girlfriend to get public attention, 3...sex (beach pics) and I'm sure there are others. Since Kiefer had the acting up part with his DUI and jail his reps went with the girlfriend. I totally agree with you about the beach pics. It played on sexy!
The pics at Denny's could have been to stop the rumors about the wrestling article that was posted. I beleive the person was saying he looked gay. Men and women love wrestling with a passion, it has a big fan base and with a article like that, I'm sure it would reach a lot of the fans who enjoy 24.
Margaret - like you, I've got absolutely no idea what the nature of Kiefer and Siobhan's relationship is, but I completely agree with your point that her absence at events like the Walk of Fame can't be taken as proof positive that it's not a "real" relationship. For what it's worth, I also get that that's all you're saying... i.e., that you're not saying that it means that they're getting married... only that it's not necessarily a signal that there's no relationship.
4:46pm, the young woman in the Paley and Walk of Fame pics works for/with Evelyn.
12:36pm, the number of people who would be "pissed off" if Kiefer is in a relationship even though he said he's single (which in any case, technically, he is) probably can be counted on one hand. Maybe two. Seriously. I think far, far more people (among those relatively few fans overall who are interested at all) think he can say and do whatever he wants when it comes to his personal life and that he doesn't owe us any explanation about it.
Margaret - thanks also for the info about how, through the magic of internet misinformation, Siobhan became a Chanel model. :) That makes a lot more sense... and, ursula, like you I think it's interesting.
Also, Margaret, I loved your metaphor about having a pebble in your shoe. Kiefer's a big boy and, as you say, I'm not seeing the gun pointed at his head. If he doesn't want to spend time with her (whatever they are or aren't to one another), why would he?
... and, if it's business, why would he look "irritated" (not that I see that)? If he's being seen with her for publicity reasons, he's... well, a big boy... and capable of dealing with that.
I guess I just don't see him as helpless to decide with whom he's going to spend his time... or as being victimized by dealing with work-related publicity obligations either (if that's all it is).
... and (this is a question that I've asked several times, but can't recall seeing responded to), if they're just friends or if it's just business, why be angry at her about either of those things? I just genuinely don't understand that.
So who did they pick to model out of the six? You didn't say.
Margaret you said she was not a model. Is this true? Did the campaign go through or did they pull the plug on it since there are no pics?? Thanks
Who was the girl at the Paley and Walk of Fame event with Kiefer? I never seen her with Evelyn before. It looked like Kiefer was going to stand near her but Evelyn called him over to talk to the press. She looked like his date and she didn't have on a press tag like Evelyn so I don't believe she works for her.
Thanks Margaret for the information and informing us that you don't have a clue about Siob and Kiefers relationship, at least it's honest.
@7:18 I don't beleive she works for Evelyn either or she wouldn't have been standing at the wall the whole time. She would have been working near Evelyn not just waiting. He did the same thing with Tricia and then he was with Catherine and Jennifer all at the same time. Why pin him down on one when that was never the case with him.
Know one has a clue about Kiefer and his relationship with Siob, I'm going to beleive what Kiefer said and that he is single and having fun. He sure was having fun at the Spotted Pig, the recent one with the couple, the stripe club and probably many more we aren't aware of. Kiefer will never change his ideas of having fun. 20 years and nothing has changed. He feels he deserves it after working hard just as long as he doesn't drive, why not? He is probably keeping his drinking as private as possible too.
All of you are soooo "old" fashion.
So, 7:18 and 7:42, you see Evelyn every day, do you? And you saw this girl every moment at the Paley event? Or... wait... did you see her twice - once walking along behind Kiefer's party at the Walk of Fame and once at the Paley? People who were at both of those events saw her with Evelyn, carrying things for Evelyn. Not with Kiefer.
7:18pm, you do realize that the only people who've ever claimed to be certain about Kiefer & Siobhan's relationship (if there is one) are those who say There's Absolutely No Way It Could Be A Relationship, right? *Most* people are of the not-having-a-clue persuasion.
Also, who said that Kiefer's not single? He is. That just doesn't preclude him having any kind of relationship(s) - or not - that he wants to have... and not feeling any obligation to fill you or anyone else not in his actual life in on the details. That's all that anyone is saying in "opposition" to the "there's no way that this could be any kind of relationship" bunch.
As for the sooooo old-fashioned part... you have no idea how funny that is. Truly. :)
6:31pm - they picked all six women. (Reread what Margaret wrote; it's clear that they did.)
6:43 - yes, it's true that she's not a model. That's one of those pieces of internet-spread "information" that started as misinterpretation of the fact that she did that single ad campaign (as a real person... not a model) for a Chanel fragrance. And, yes, the campaign ran. It's not surprising that versions of a print ad campaign that ran in 1999 aren't easy to find on the internet... if they can be found there at all.
Margaret,I have always wondered about the beach photos and whether they were staged so I thank you for the information regarding them. I said awhile back that perhaps they were staged so maybe magazines would pick up on them for sexy beach picks that they usually write about at the end of summer.
In regard to the media and coverage on Kiefer which he doesn't get enough of in my opinion, I feel a lot of the things he does for media attention goes to the internet since they don't seem to be interested in putting it into print. I feel like you do, that his PR's are behind it and of course Kiefer is aware of it.
My biggest question to you would be. Why did Kiefer stay with Kelly for 12 years without divorcing her sooner especially when he was seen so many times with other women? I will always find this strange.They were separated in 1999/filed for divorce in 2004 and I can't believe it would take 4 yrs for a divorce to go through. Maybe you can help me understand this confusion.
Is Kiefer that deceitful in staging things with all these women? What woman would put up with the things he has done and I'm not talking about his drinking on this issue. If your going to go out with other women why stay married? I would like an answer just from Margaret on this issue since I find she is honest with her opinions and not misleading. Thanks Margaret!
Kalin...
Oh really it didn't appear to me like she was carrying anything in the photos and those 2 people might have said that simple because they didn't want to connect her with Kiefer.
She was standing at the Paley event for a long time with nothing in her hands except maybe her purse. Nor was she outside the Paley Event with Evelyn helping her there. At the Walk of Fame event there was nothing in her hands either. All of a sudden Evelyn has an assistance at her side, gosh when did that happen after all these years of Evelyn doing things on her own. Like she really needed so much help at the Paley Center event.
Standing up against the wall she really looked busy...lol.
Sorry, nice try with your misleading answers. You should stop hugging your computer and give your alcoholic husband a hug and some attention instead of spending so much of your time involved in Kiefers lovelife. Your life must be very lonely!!
Everyone else have a great Holiday!!
Nicole, your posts certainly give the impression that you are quite a nasty person.
They do that, don't they, ursula? :)
That said, I can't believe that anyone can be that mean unless they have a lot of pain in their heart, so...
I wish everyone a warm and peaceful holiday! And, Nicole, I especially send good thoughts to you. Truly.
I haven't always seen eye to eye with Christy but you are out of line there Nicole.Really,why are you here if you have such a wonderful life?And Kalin,no offence this is a public forum we can comment on what we like to who we like and I'm sure Margaret is not the only person here who has an opinion on this.
Merry Christmas to you all :)
I haven't always seen eye to eye with Christy but you are out of line there Nicole.Really,why are you here if you have such a wonderful life?And Kalin,no offence this is a public forum we can comment on what we like to who we like and I'm sure Margaret is not the only person here who has an opinion on this.
Merry Christmas to you all :)
I haven't always seen eye to eye with Christy but you are out of line there Nicole.Really,why are you here if you have such a wonderful life?And Kalin,no offence this is a public forum we can comment on what we like to who we like and I'm sure Margaret is not the only person here who has an opinion on this.
Merry Christmas to you all :)
First off, happy holidays one and all. I think my pet peeve with the mainstream media coverage of Kiefer is that he's covered extensively when he's naughty (the DUI bust), but barely noticed for the nice career hat trick(His Walk of Fame Star and SAG and Golden Globe nominations) or VGA award or success at Ironworks. I for one am tired of hearing the bad brought up continuously without appreciation of the good.
Sorry..major computer glitch there..
Posted by: wildchild
Nicole, there's absolutely no justification for making such a crude, hurtful comment. I hope you don't use this tactic whenever your opinion differs with other people...you won't make or keep many friends. As an aside, I happen to have pics of Siobhan's Chanel Fragrance print ads, some solo, others paired with Marc Tiercellin and Brad Gooch. She looks quite stunning in them. Links can't be posted here, but if interested, let me know.
I think Nicole was just giving back to Christy a piece of her own nastiness. Christy doesn't need to criticize or comment to everyones post and demand an reason to why some of us dislike Siobhan. She acts like those comments are aimed at her. I know people like Madonna but does that mean we all have to? I respect everyones opinion on this site and no matter how much I might have disageed I never responsed like Christy with her nasty responses and there have been many. All of you have seen it! I agree she should response with the same respect as "so many others" have done.
After all, how many times has she called Kiefer an "alcoholic" when none of us know whether it is true or not. Then compare him to her husband like she knows for sure this is what Kiefer is. That to me it is just as disrespectful as Nicoles comment was, so what's the differents. From what I have heard Kiefer has always been to work on time and never missed a day. He has always made it to his interviews, events and tv shows etc: without canceling. With her, "know it all" comments she had no right to compare her husband to Kiefer. Kiefer likes to go out and party on his downtime. It is not a "every day" thing with him. I'm sure many of us will be doing that today. So be responsible, have fun and do not drunk and drive. Merry Christmas everyone!
PS. I loved the poem on BBennys site. Please read it if you get time today. So cute! Well done!
5:05AM
She does call Kiefer a Alcoholic all the time. This site is about Kiefer not her husband.
Wildchild:
By responsing you are just as crude!
@5:05AM...I agree the poem was very cute! To whomever took the time out to write it, thanks so much. Maybe one day Kiefer will be there to pick you up, not in a SUV but his Astin Martin. You deserve that ride and breakfast at Denny's on the way.
*Merry Christmas Everyone and Nicole too*
Kalin
Thanks for the info wildchild.Please tell us the web address and we can look it up from there.Thanks
It took me a bit of time to search through my bookmarks, but I managed to locate the site again(finding the jpgs was easier, LOL) Just remember to precede the text below with http:// to make the link work *hopefully.
perso.numericable.fr/mmichelemi97/michelmepubs/ListeC/ChanelCollection.htm#Liste
Sorry, wildchild, but the end of the link got cut off - and it didn't work for me. Do you think you could give it to us again?
Thanks.
Try this site under "Google":
type in...Bienvenue Sur Mon Site d'echange de
1. Click on Collection
2. From A to Z (go to C)
3. Click on Chanel
4. then click on Allure
The site should come up for you. You can tranlate the site once you get there but there is no need. They have a question ? mark by her name.
Kalin
The prefume is called Allure by Chanel not like Nicole Kidmans prefume by Chanel No 5.
Kalin
Thanks, Kalin. If you still have problems, Lola... I backed out of the sub page, so you can try the main page, then follow Kalin's directions. Here's the new link (put http:// in front)
perso.numericable.fr/mmichelemi97/michelmespubs/ListeC/ListePubsC.htm
hey siobhan did model,she was no super model but i have seen ads of her from 1995 ish....she may have only done one thing for channel,but she was a model...before working for cosmo. and there is nothing wrong with that...
OK, She modelled once but it is a big difference between being a Chanel runway model which was widely reported and doing one real person campaign.
Funny how some people have their own websites where they dictate what can be said. then they show up here sticking their noses into things.
Oh really 4:53 grow up. And I, for one, do not have my own website thank you very much. It is a public forum, we are having a discussion here just like you are.Oh! but you are not having a discussion are you?You are bitching about other people. And as for sticking nose's in I hadn't realised that Kiefer's business is for the interest of a select group of people only.
Oh 8:19, I'm worried now! lol!!!!! Too bad you don't get to issue warnings here. Did I hit a nerve? lol
lol 10.49. Don't you think we should be discussing Kiefer?And yeah too bad:)
Thanks, Kalin & wildchild. I followed your directions and got to see the pics.
Thanks, Kalin and wildchild. Nice ads. :)
To LadySutherland/Niki/Ripley/if one of you is Nicole/whichever ones of you posts here (i.e., All Of Those Who Live In A State Of Constant Readiness-to-be-Insulted... By Everything... not to mention Who Don't Understand What A Complex Creature Kiefer Is and Actually Think He's Perfect Or Something)...
I know that you don't understand what I post about Siobhan (every single interpretation of my thoughts/posts that you've posted is just plain wrong... you don't get what I'm saying about their relationship - whatever it is or isn't - at all) and that you don't understand what I'm saying about Kiefer's drinking (and you don't... at all) and that you don't understand that disagreement and/or feeling differently about something isn't a threat... and all of that is fine.
... but, just for the record, you're wasting your energy trying to bully me. Wasting it in a big way. :)
Christy/Dillon,whoever you are.Nobody is trying to bully you. This blog is to discuss Kiefer thats all.
I can't imagine anyone suggesting that Kiefer is perfect Christy. You seem obsessed with turning this blog around to involve you and your OPINIONS, why would anybody waste their energy trying to bully you?No-one even knows who you are LOL!!! Some of us disagree, fine. Iam not really sure who you are referring to on the above post but I do think it's time X17 removed this blog. You are making it too personal and that is a shame for other people.
Hi Christy,I feel quite shocked that you have felt the need to have a public outburst in this way and name people from another forum.Whats sparked this little piece of anger?As far as I'm aware only Hoppel,Linda and myself (Ripley/Louise)post at X17.So maybe you ought to get your facts right and I think you owe some people an apology.I don't care that we disagree and I also do not think Kiefer is perfect either but really Christy you must get of the soapbox you are permanently on.You have come here for 6 months day in/day out and patronised everybody who has not agreed with you.You repeat youself over and over.I felt sorry for you when I heard of your husband,I also felt sorry when someone made a comment against that but perhaps they were onto something if this is your behaviour.I think that you would benefit from your own blog and then you can harp on as much as you like whilst the rest of us discuss Kiefer.Best of luck to you.
Just to add Christy, why on earth do you think people are bullying you? Are you that insecure you think people are "cyber bullying" you just because they don't agree with you?Why when we disagree with you do we get labelled as being nuts or over-wrought or whatever language you used.Say whatever you like to me but I would appreciate it if you didn't verbally abuse anybody else who does not post here but who are Kiefer fans.You will be pleased to know I will not be posting here anymore,I'm tired of this madness so if anybody else begins to berate you or "bully" you, you know it isn't me.Maybe you should ask X17 for a job as you clearly feel you run the show here.Just a thought.Have a great day!
Louise/Ripley!!(Hi everybody since Christy/Dillon has announced it to the world who Iam, just thought I'd introduce myself properly) :-)
3:14 I can agree with that. Its about time Christy felt bullied, its what she does to others on this site believing we should agree to her opinions. How many times is she going to say...You don't get what I'm saying about their relationship, "?whatever it is or isn't?". This in my opinion means she has no clue either what is going on with them just like the rest of us. We are "all" just guessing Christy just like you but there is NO reason for you to get upset with everyones opinion because it different then yours. Some of us really don't care what his relationship is with her, we try to move on to other things related to Kiefer but you keep bringing everyone back to them. I for one don't care whether or not they are in a relationship because Kiefer has been in many and its the same "Pattern" he is following with her as he did with Kelly, Catherine, Tricia and his other women. Nothing is different or I would be agreeing that it was a serious relationship and something special. I repeat...Its the same "Pattern" Christy he is following as he did with the other women so please understand if alot of us don't agree with you. No need to get upset or get nasty. You have no respect or understanding for anyones opinion but your own.
I did respect your opinion at one point Christy but now you been attacking everyones comments who don't have the same opinion as you. They are not "disagreements" but nasty attacks.
One other thing I would like to add is the word "relationship". People have their only definition of what a relationship is and what it might mean to them. So Christy that is why some people can't believe they are in a relationship. No need to get upset with them just because their meaning of the word "relationship" is different then yours also.
My post got cut off...Just would like to add is the word "relationship". People have their own definition of what a relationship is and what it might mean to them. So Christy that is why some people can't believe they are in a relationship. No need to get upset with them just because their meaning of the word "relationship" is different then yours also.
For cryng out loud Christy! We all get you, OK! You have drilled it into our head's so many damn times fot the past six months!!! We get you,we get you,we get you!!! Were you the youngest sibling or from a large family or something like?You appear to be obsessed with not being heard. We are all sane and educated people on here, just some do not see what you see but we understand your opinions now please can we damn well move on??? Or Iam changing the name to X17-HOME OF CHRISTY THE DELUSIONAL.Really this is getting crazy
Christy, you seem to waver between lucidity and a dark place depending on which personality is in charge that day.How dare you speak to people who you don't even know like that?If any of us on this site needs to stop posting on the thread it should be you.
So Christy/Dillon is on BBenny's site. Why post under Christy and not Dillon? Talk about others posting under anonymous, at less they aren't liars. I wonder how many other names you have posted under...what a dirty rat you are to give someone elses name away.
Hope you stay with us Louise. Enjoyed your opinions. If anyone should go, it should be Christy/Dillon who does nothing but mislead Kiefer fans with her delusional opinions.
Hate to say this but BB site was very delusional until some fans called them out on their posting dates and misleading write ups. I'm glad to say that I was one of them. I'm glad to see that the fans are questioning BB in the chatbox about the post dates and other issues. The site is becoming more real, "no thanks" to Christy who never informed us on this misinformed information or how deceitful that site was. BB site has improved alot but I will continue to question any dates or misleading write-ups if I feel it is not right. Why should any site want to feed false information to the fans. Do not write anything if you don't know the facts for sure or dates.
Just would like to "Thank" BB for improving her site and put out some real information about Kiefer and letting the fans become more open in the chatbox. Her williness to make changes on her site, made me see, her honest enjoyment of Kiefer shining through. Anyone here from her site, I'm eating my words.
Bravo! 10.33, Awesome post!
You guys are hilarious. I mean to say truly, knee-slappingly hilarious. :)
Signed, Christy/dillon/annabella (well, duh that I'm each of those names... 'annabella' and 'dillon' were just board names that I signed up with at different times and Christy is my real name... no secret there... never was ;))
You are out of line Christy
And a stupid stupid woman.If you are a woman that is.You could have landed from Mars for about as much sense as your posts make. A decent person would apologise
I might as well say who I am, although it will be posted in the name anyways. I’m betting I’m the LadySutherland who was named in the 3 names up in Christy’s post earlier. Especially since the 3 usernames are, funnily enough, members of Kiefer’s Place. But that's not my point anyway.
Anyways, my point here is to Christy.
I’m English. And good job too cause, do you realize that in England, this is considered a form of libel?
And in this country you can be sued for defamation of character?
None of us 3 are Nicole.
Why don’t you ask NICOLE to come forward and not attack the innocents.
LadySutherland, I didn't say that you were Nicole. The post was addressed to multiple people.
But, then, why would you understand that... since, still and yet, not one of the crowd of people who think I'm the boogeyman (well, boogeywoman... boogeymartian... whichever) ever have demonstrated any understanding of what I'm actually saying.
And that's true no matter how much you much you jump up & down saying that you DO get it, 6:51... :)
As for defamation of character... um, yeah... glass houses, etc... ;)
Really really really Christy and I'm gonna swear here why the f**k should we care what you think???Why are you so desperate for acceptance?There is a common denominator here for all the arguing and guess what it's called, Bingo, it's Christy!We do know what you are saying we just think you are talking a load of crap.Go away please. And as for the glass houses comment it was you stated to the entire blog who we were and which site we were from and I agree with whoever said that was out of line.What are you actually pissed about Christy?The fact that your friends were scrubbed off the site or was it really you?Or that we don't want to discuss bloody Siobhan?Because you have not told us the reason for this outburst?..Clearly you have been "sticking your nose" in on Kiefer's Place....Or have you a little spy called something ridiculous like Snuglybugly you say morning and goodnight too like you have nothing better to do...
I'm sorry but why all the different names Christy? Do you even know your own name?Or does it change day to day depending on your mood?You talk about other people being alcoholics well I would say that you are suffering from some of the classic signs yourself.Maybe you have the onset of dementia.Whatever, you have problems.
I might as well put in my name, since it was already mentioned ....
As LadySutherland said, none of us is Nicole, so instead of insulting people you don't know who are, why not ask that nicole??
It was way uncalled to mention our names and blame us for such things that we have never done . I know for myself i've never ever posted here . So i don't see how i could have done such thing . And the two others you mentioned are my friends , and i know they would / and never have done such thing, which upsets me that you would blame us for such thing .
Confuses me , and upsets me very much!!
And as Louise says , you have had your nose in Kiefer's Place , else you wouldn't know to call me Niki . . . .
Louise - I'm not "pissed off"; I'm amused. As I've said a whole lot of times, I don't care that we disagree. I just think it's truly funny that you don't even understand what you're disagreeing with... and, from every demonstration I've seen here, you don't.
Aside from not understanding what I think about the Kiefer/Siobhan situation (whatever it is), you seriously don't know what alcoholism is. Alcoholics can/do show up at work every day and alcoholics don't necessarily drink all the time. There are all different kinds of alcoholics. In any case, I don't use the word as an insult. I use it with sympathy.
As for calling you out by name, no apology is forthcoming. I think it's cowardly to post anonymously. And, yeah, I've been on Kiefer's Place (I've said as much here; it's not a secret). Now that you've shut it down to prevent any opposing opinions from being posted there, not so much. But prior to that, it was a public place, wasn't it?
By the way, I don't know why you banned Liz, but I'm guessing you banned supergirl because she said that Kiefer is a 'player'. That was the thing I saw you all up in arms about, anyway. But, but... I thought that you folks didn't think that Kiefer is perfect. If so, why the censorship? Just curious.
To answer your question, Anonymous @ 1:39 -
I signed up on the Krew with the id dillon and at FOX with the id annabella at totally different times. There was no relationship between the two ids and my posting style is very easily identifiable so there certainly never was a thought of "hiding" my identity. I always assume that anyone who cares at all, knows that I'm both ids... and if anyone's curious and asks, I always respond that, yep, I'm the same person.
When Benny's came along, I just used the 'dillon' id to post there. I use it on Liz's too. Again, there never was any 'secret' about me being me.
On this thread, I just used my own name... as I usually do if I'm posting on an infotainment news site. Who knew that this would turn into such a long-running thread?! But it did!
So, that's the whole story. Sorry that it's not very interesting. :)
Niki, as I said to Louise up-thread, I was addressing multiple people... to whomever it might apply... I wasn't saying that "you're Nicole."
As for who all the "anonymous" folks are... well, unless and until people start having the guts to post under their names (or a consistent id... doesn't have to be the person's "real" name, of course!), what can a person do but guess where the nastiness is coming from? Well, guess based on writing style, anyway... :)
OK What am I disagreeing with?And in simple terms please I haven't got enough time to live to listen to your long drawn out ramblings.And you were out of order to call people out Christy it was not your place to do so.If you are not a coward then why use lots of different names yourself?Louise, for the record since you are making an issue of it is in fact my real name. People can disagree on Kiefer's Place,ask Linda we have had some good debates and she doesn't act like a bitch so we get on and discuss what we all like to discuss which is Kiefer.Personally, I think you just like agitating people.I don't even believe you are a proper fan.Just someone who likes to have their hands stuffed into lots of different pies.Out of interest how many other fan sites are you a member of?You don't intimidate me Christy and to be honest I'd rather this all calmed down and we could get on but you seem hell bent on getting into the ring with me. I have had some great laughs over this also so maybe we should keep going it certainly seems to be entertaining people. I won't back down so it's entirely up to you how you want this to play out.The censorship thing I cannot answer because I'm only a member but if people were causing a problem them I'm sure the moderators acted accordingly.Plus it is nor your or my business it's between them and the moderators.
Christy yet again is that headed towards the Kiefer Place people? I will agree with you that people should post theire names as I feel as though I'm getting alittle confused with the anonymous but someone actually asked that people did not post anonymously and they were told that it was up to the individual.I forgot to put my name on two posts as you did also Christy on a couple which is actually how this started but..hey does it matter?I have no idea who the other posts are from so perhaps they are from Benny's or Liz's site as they seem to know you and I do not post anywhere except here and K.P.
Hello.
Do any of you Guy's/Gal's here know of a latest fan photograph is circulating. It is showing of Keifer in a bar with the lovely Siobhan. Just wondred if any here knew of infomation?
So sorry did not know to post a name it is Anais above at 4.37PM.
Anais, I know the one you mean but don't have any info for you.No idea if it is recent or anything like that.As it is a fan pic it could be recent or could be old. Somebody else here may know.We actually see more of Sib than Kiefer in the shot I'm afraid.:(
Nicoles comment was meant for Christy so I'm not sure why she would take her anger out on others. Nicole "clearly" posted her name so why did Christy involve so many other names.
In my opinion she did it "deliberately" to attack Kieferplace blogs. She came to this site expressing her anger at the things people were saying on that site about Siob and as she did this she was also expressed her anger at the people on this site. I became very confused about this anger because in my opinion on visiting Kieferplace site I felt they had a right to like or dislike Siob and the same with this site. I believe Nicole got just as confused with Christy's anger at us here. For some reason she became more "obsessed" with everyones opinion about Siob then with Kiefers which I was beginning to wonder about. Why was it okay for her to put Kiefer down for his drinking problems but if anyone mentioned their dislike of Siob she went bananas on everyone. Does she really believe she can dictate to us. It made me question whether Christy is the one with the alcoholic problem.
Yes, there is no question in my mind she "deliberately" attacked you at Kiefersplace by using Nicoles comment to flush you out. That was very low of her! She is too "obsess" with Siob and peoples opinion of her which is "obnormal" in my opinion.
Hope everyone had a wonderful holiday. I just wanted to come by to thank Margaret for all her insightful information.
I just have two issues to take up with your points, Margaret, if you don't mind.
1. While I understand where you were going with the Jay Z, etc. comparison I can't quite compare Kiefer to him as Jay Z is a completely closed off person and walks around always with many bodyguards so their personalities are completely different which may or may not mean something in how they would handle simple relationship questions;
2. It was Kiefer, IMHO who went out and paraded this relationship or whatever it is by coming out of Pastis on April 1st and then going to the Waverly Inn another paparazzi hotspot and actually posing for many pictures.
Why go through all that and then suddenly turn around and become closed off. He had to know what doing that outing would bring on. He knows this business and in my view he wanted to do this and also, IMHO I don't think he should have it both ways.
Don't know what the relationship is between them or where it is going but what happened in April is very hard to figure here as it is a certain contrast to what has happened since.
Thankyou 5.17 I really appreciate that:)I agree with what you have said as Christy seems to show some wierd behaviour at times.She said she found it funny and was laughing but the undercurrent I got from her posts was actually rage. I don't know why she did not join Kiefers place and send us personal messages if she had issues.If she had any class she would have instead of airing it all for her(tiny)public on Benny's site or wherever she posts to see.I take points that Sib was trashed by many including myself but that is my right,Christy does not know her either but she seems determined to prove that they are/or are not together and thats how she feels.That is fine.I respect that but I do not want to know every day that Christy has not made up her mind about them.I understand.But in reality we don't care about Siobhan at all.Period.We are Kiefer fans and unfortunately certain people seem to have forgotton that.I think in reality Christy wants to be Siobhan whilst we want to hear about Kiefer... now to meet him would be even better... :)
wow, just wow, I can't believe where this whole thing has gone, where to start. First Anyone who reads blogs or fans sites where Christy/Annabella/Dillon post has to know that it is the same person, If you don't, well then you have a problem cause her style is very unique. I really don't understand why all the attacks on her, so she has a different opinion than alot of you and feels very strongly about it, so what you feel strongly about your opinion. Opinions are just that , opinions and not facts. I don'g get all the Siobhan bashing, we don't know her and you can't judge by pics. Kiefer's place was going off today about how he looked mad in a pic and he was with her, Well sure he looked mad, well maybe smoke or the sum was in his eyes. Just an example. I looks pissed alot cause I wear contacts and they dry out so I squint and make not so nice faces, you just never know. Also like Christy I believe Kiefer is an alcoholic, sorry but IMHO he is. and for all you guys who say so what let him have fun as long as he isn't driving, tell that to his liver, cause the way he is living WILL kill this man that you love so much, so I would hope for him to quit if I were you guys. Either his liver or lungs or voice will go if no all three. So I don't think she is judging here but there are health concerns about what he does. Also we may never know about his relationship. It may be staged it may be that he is really mad in those pics, cause maybe just maybe he is trying to have a relationship. Something I doubt he will ever have, cause as much as you guys think he and Kelly were perfect and too bad that didn't work, Just remember he is the one who just couldn't keep his D&*( in his pants. Seems he has a problem with that too. So anyway. that is what I have to say about all of that.
and 5:17 pm, Christy probably disagrees with forming an opinion on Siobhan casue we don't know her and she isn't a danger to his health. the Alcohol is, you guys are in as much denial as he is, if you knew him personally, you would be called an enabler. And would need as much help as he does.
Thanks for that opionion 6.20PM.So we are all wannabe alcoholics now,brilliant.No-one said he didn't have a drink problem but I think it was the severity of that problem that was under issue.Someone said it was up to a doctor to decide on and the term "alcoholic" is a broad spectrum and shouldn't be used lightly I agree.Are you two doctor's now?Your post got cut off "he is the one who just couldn't keep his .." what was at the end.Cheers.
Louise, if you understood what 6:16/6:20 posted, you understand where I'm coming from in re: Kiefer and Siobhan. She gets it completely. I don't know what's gone on or is going on between them, but I don't get hating someone that none of us know (or know very much at all about) from afar.
As for differing opinions on Kiefer's Place, I think that the only way that you and Linda differ is that she thinks that the two of them have had and/or have some kind of relationship and you don't. You're in total agreement about thinking that Siobhan's an awful woman and *that's* the point of view that's required on KP. That's made clear in the only remaining public thread on that board. Is it LadySutherland's right to run her board however she wants? Absolutely! But don't pretend that "free" conversation is allowed there, because that's not true. ... and, yes, that's just as bashing Siobhan isn't permitted on Benny's. Personally, I prefer a place where bitter hatred isn't encouraged over one where it's required.
Just out of curiosity... how do you define a "proper fan"?
6:16 said that his previous relationships have failed because he couldn't keep his dick in his pants (surely among other reasons) and I agree.
5:17, where did this "going bananas on everyone" take place? And, though I'm sure you're never ever gonna get this, I'm not "putting Kiefer down" when I say that I believe that he's an alcoholic.
6:16 and 6:20. Do you really know how much Kiefer drinks. Do you live with him to tell us if he drinks every day, once a week, once every 2 weeks or once a month. I'm afraid none of us have a answer to that question. I believe "you are in denial" about Siob and her health problems with smoking and second hand smoke and what about the pics of her sitting in bars with Kiefer. Does she have a "drinking problem" also or is she drinking "Shirley Temples". I guess Siob would be the "enabler" since she knows Kiefer more personally then I do. Hello wake up! You are as blind as a bat. I'm glad you can agree with Christy and her opinions.
Ahhh, 7:03... and you and your buddies wonder why things get hostile. Amazing. Truly.
Hey, Anais - a couple of people on Benny's made good guesses about the photo of Kiefer and Siobhan that just appeared.
One person noticed that one of the guys with them is Alexandre Aja, the director of Mirrors, so it seems like it's a good guess that this photo dates from August when Kiefer and Aja were doing publicity for the movie.
Then someone else guessed that, since they did a press conference at the Hard Rock in San Diego on the morning of Comic Con, maybe that photo is at the Hard Rock (perhaps the night before?).
I'd say that placing it in August is a *really* good guess and that it could be in the Hard Rock (the guitar on the wall along with that being where the press conference was held makes that a good guess).
LadySutherland has said yes to free talk! and it still is! But since the talk about Sib has turned to people bashing Kiefer, people who called themself fans, she has desided not to allow that kinda talk , which she has ALL right to do!!
Also something i DON'T GET, is how you people can call Kiefer an alcoholic and a guy who can't keep his dick in his pants and still have a f****** smile on your face and call yourself Kiefer fans!!! .
A proper fan is a fan that loves Kiefer for who he is! And we damn well know that he isn't an alcoholic, and alcoholic as ADDICTED to alcohol which he is NOT!. And i damn well know that since my dad is it! Kiefer is a guy who likes to party and have a drink with friends and people in town . If that is was you say is an alcoholic then go to Denmark and 60% of the people there will be alcoholic if you think that way! and most of them party MUCH MUCH more than Kiefer!!
Omg! that you have the cheek to say such things about Kiefer ... And then call yourself fans! OMFG!! ...
why are yo worried about sibs second hand smoke, until Kiefer quits it isn't an issue, that was a pretty dumb statement. and Loiuse, and enabler isn't a wannabe alcoholic, chekc the definition, it is a person who enables a person to brink to much. either by making excuses or ignoring the fact. and I think with all the pics we have seen and 4 duis, and yes I know only 2 where actuall counted, but so what, he was still drinking, then yes in my opinion he is an alcoholic, you don't have to be on skid row to be one. and yes if he doesn't get it under control and probably will eventually kill him. and why the double standard for Sioghan, we just started hearing about her, we have no reports that aare years old of her drinking like we do Kiefer's so I guess is she has been at it as long and hard as Kiefer, then yes she will have health problems also, but you guys would love that wouldn't you. And she may be an enabler, I don't know. but she isn't here argueing with everyone. Semms nothing Kiefers does if wrong but everything Siobhan does is wrong. I am not blind as a bat, you people and your love for Kiefer are, and I don't always agree with Christy but that is ok and she understantd that. And if I posted my name I am sure she would know who I was, but I am not giving that info out.
Niki, I am not necessarily a fan, fan is short for Fanatic, and I think people are true to that term. and he can't keep his dick in his pants by his own admission, he fools around. I don't know why you can't accept the truth. If he isn't an alcoholic then he is stupid for getting caught driving that many times while drinking, so I would prefer to think that he is an alocoholic and no t stupid, but have it your way, Kiefer is stupid, there feel better. At least with alcoholim is a disease and can be treated, stupidity cannot.
Niki, I'm sorry that your dad is an alcoholic. Truly.
But I continue to believe that Kiefer has a major drinking problem and is, imo, an alcoholic. That doesn't mean that his drinking behavior (or behavior in general) is the same as your dad's. All alcoholics are different... just like all people are different.
But Kiefer himself has talked about being a "textbook problem drinker" and one of the rules about drinking problems really is... if you ever wonder if you have a problem, you probably do. That seems simplistic, I know... but it also is a pretty clear barometer.
As for not being able to keep his dick in his pants, that's something that he's been clear about - in word and deed - too. I'm not judging it - it doesn't matter to me... I'm not in a relationship with him! ;) - but I'm not laboring under the delusion that it isn't true either.
And, yet, I adore him... from afar... and am sure that I would from up close too! :) I think that knowing that these things are true about him and still being fascinated by him, thinking highly of him (as someone who's kind and smart and talented and beautiful inside and out) is completely consistent with being a "fan."
7:17pm, I'm usually pretty good at being able to tell who people are, but I'm not sure about who you are. Well, I have a guess, but am not sure. Anyway... what you said. :)
Christy at 6:50
You do enough bashing for everyone and there you go again. Benny's site had its problems with misleading info, posting dates and the fans talking about fur hair for crying out loud. BB site is still not open to real talk, like x17.
In my opinion the only person who was hateful here was you. People might bash Siob but they were not bashing you personally or your opinions. Stop being so hateful. You still don't get it!! Know one needs to use hateful words to disagree about something. Why is your heart filled with so much anger and hate if someone has a different opinion then yours? Why the attacks on the people who dislike her? How can you like her or believe they are good together? It would appear her life isn't any better then Kiefers. She drinks and smokes like him. She just encouraging it, she might be an alcoholic too.
I would think of all people on this site that you would be the one to want to discourage their relationship because she appears to be too much like Kiefer.
Kalin
Kalin, I don't know anything (except third hand rumors) about Siobhan so how on earth would I know that she's "too much like him"?
... and that you think that I'm the one who's so angry and "full of hate" is just... well, it's baffling to me... but okay... if that's what you think, that's what you think. :)
... and, erm, as an aside... why would I think it was a bad thing to be "like him"? There are oodles and oodles of wonderful things about him... and, yeah, he's also got some issues. Most people do, one way or another. They doesn't make me think that "being like him" is a by definition "bad" thing. At all! :)
Out of curiousity I checked out the Hard Rock in San Diego online and the pictures don't look the same to me as the "new" one that surfaced of Kiefer and Siob. The private room is paneled and while some walls in the main bar may be that color the texture looks different. Perhaps it's from August 2007 in LA around the time the first pics of them having lunch appeared.
Tricia
I don't think it's recent. The fan pic with K+S was posted by a member of MySpace, a guy from NY. His last login was on March 22, 2008 so I guess the picture was taken before that date.
....One person noticed that one of the guys with them is Alexandre Aja...
Really? No, according to the guy it's "Paul, Duke, woman and Jack" ;-)
Look,what I'm really struggling with is this obsession that you NEED to be heard Christy.It really is becoming tiresome now.Even when we say that we understand you you start again about it all.And I know what an enabler is thankyou very much but I don't think we should be discussing something as sensitive as Kiefer's drink problem's because we don't know what they are. And you have no idea what I think.If you had read my posts you would have seen that at some point I believe that there was a relationship of some kind but I don't anymore and I should not have to explain myself to you.Why can't we just have a conversation?But you seem incapable without becoming patronising and dictative.You seem to be suffering from some kind of superiority complex to me and no-one can seem to reason with you unless they agree with you.
Just to add, you think we are obsessed with discussing Siobhan and hating her etc but you are equally obessessed with making Kiefer out to be an alcoholic and a womaniser.If we want to get down to the nitty gritty then yes we could say those things are true in some way I agree but our point is that we are aware of those things becasue we know he isn't perfect but we do not want to dwell on them as fans.We are aware of those problems though and that is what YOU don't get.We are fans and the last thing I want to discuss is Kiefers drinking habits and really Niki is right about Denmark as in European countries we are big drinkers. If you came here you would think we were all alsoholics Iam sure. Its amazing,you Americans can go around shooting eachother but then accuse someone of being an alcoholic if they go out enjoy themselves!Or is that just you Christy that has these opinions and your friend who keeps posting anonymously-thought you didn't like that?Or is it really you. Louise
I'm not going to apologise for hating Siobhan. You do not think we get anything from photograph's well here is a thought.Her Dad is a Psychiatrist he will have used photographs to pick out certain mannerisms,traits etc at somepoint in his career of people I'm sure.Did you know that they do that?Just like the Psychological Profiler's do.They look at a scene or a photograph and they pick up on things.Body language, the eyes,their hands.We have seen alot of pictures of them together and are you telling me that we are all wrong?It isn't just 3 of us on KP who think this Christy it's quite a few people.We get bad vibes from her and I'm sticking to my opinion on her just as you are saying you don't know enough to comment. Fine you obviously are not talented in this way but personally I'm usually a very good judge of character and I do not like this woman.But I respect that you do not know enought to make an assumption that is fine also.Louise
7.17.You do not want to give your name out but do you think it is OK for Christy to do that of other people?Watch yourself if you step out of line she will rat you out like the nasty bitch she is.
Why don't you analyze this, check out the new pic on Benny's, Kiefer at Dave's wedding, gee he has that same pissed off look. Guess he it trapped by the fame and fortune seeking Dave also.. lol. And I am sure her dad the psychiatrist, would have a field day with you guys.
You should read over what some people have to say Christy before answering their post. I never said you were like Kiefer (thank god because you are so hateful and spiteful). I said Siobhan was to much like Kiefer for them to be good together. It would appear her life isn't any better then Kiefers with smoking and drinking. She could be an alcoholic like "YOU" believe Kiefer is.
You are NO fan of Kiefers when you can say hateful and hurtful things about him. You have no proof that he is an alcoholic or when your saying he couldn't keep his dick in his pants. I have never hear or see it written, Kiefer using those words as cruel as you put it. Where are those words written by Kiefer. I hope your not comparing your alcoholic husband to Kiefer. Is this how your husband treats you? I can't image Kiefer being that cruel or hateful.
You go around claiming to know Kiefer so well but none of us truely know him on a personal level. We see just a "teeny tiny itsy bitsy" part of his life, we don't see the rest to judge him as cruelty as you have. And I can't image him being a rat like you.
Kalin
Kalin, Kiefer has admitted fooling around. He may have not staed it this way, but he has admitted it. Grow up, he isn't perfect. But you can love him despite being perfect can't you?
Go read the playboy interview, asked What is the worst thing you have ever done He says, Lied to Kelly and my mom, Asked did that lie have to do with being with another woman his answer, YES, there you go, black and white. Come back to reality, he admitted it.
Kalin I agree with your post and think you made some great points.In Christy's words-whoever is posting anonymously you are being a "coward" so until you state a name I'm not even reading your posts.And just to add to what Kalin said I think it's the fact that Christy and anonymous(or Christy's second personality,either way)has made some crude comments about Kiefer "dick in pants" etc that has really pissed people off.We see your point but is there any need?We could say Siobhan can't keep her gold-digging paws off rich men..Same thing.Too crude for this discussion.
Hi everyone. This PUBLIC board is becoming the best argument against censorship. As you can see people seem to want to dictate to others what is and isn't acceptable discussion. Why doesn't everyone just try to keep in mind that Kiefer is a celebrity who is a public person who takes full advantage of all the perks of being a public person, e.g. preferred seating at restaurants, concerts, broadway shows; gets to jump the long lines for concerts and enjoys VIP luxury; gets first class treatment whether or not he request it; enjoys all kinds of free merchandise and gets a free public platform to lecture us on his cultural and political viewpoints. We as the paying public employ him and allow him to enjoy these many advantages; he is enjoying fully the fruits of OUR labor. All of the money we spend on his 24 DVDs, Movie DVDs, IW CDs and attendance at his movies goes into his pocket. By extension his current girlfriend of the day, Siobhan Bonnouvrier also enjoys those benefits.
My point is that all of these things allow us to discuss all things related to him and anyone else enjoying the fruits of our labor. Whether that is to call him an alcholic, a womanizer or to analyze over and over his relationships and discuss his current girlfriend. If either Kiefer or Siobhan or anyone else related to him doesn't like it they can reimburse us. Just my humble opinion on the matter, wink wink!!
Hi ladies. Wanted to add some thoughts. I agree with those who think Kiefer is an alcoholic. What else do you call a grown man who hangs in bars quite often and even goes in alone just to drink and get drunk. I mean in that picture from March or so he is with his supposed girlfriend, you know, the one who "changed" him and he is clearly drunk. But obviously I am not a doctor and can't diagnose him, it is just my opinion. I don't like Siobhan and Christy, as you know I have stated very specific reasons for not liking her. No, I don't know her personally but I don't know Madonna personally or Gwenneth Paltrow personally and I can't stand either of them for very specific reasons. It may not bother you and I respect that, but it bothers me that the two men back to back that she has clawed into happen to both be very wealthy men; that raises my suspicions about motives especially when she rid herself of the first one when she clearly saw a better opportunity. I think that she wants to get into the hollywood business in some fashion and Kiefer was a prime and vulnerable target given his state with everything that happened to him.
As for Kiefer's Place, I don't understand the problem. There are several sites where we are absolutely Banned or attacked for saying anything negative about Siobhan and I respect those individuals who own their sites to make those decisions. Lady Sutherland offers us on our side a place to go to state our views without fear of reprisal. It's the only place in town. If you want to defend Siobhan, etc. there are lots of alternatives....
I know what Kiefer said in the Playboy interview @ 5:35 and 5:39 and I know he is not perfect. I think that both of you should go back and read it over because like I said Kiefer would never say anything that cruel or hateful the way Christy put it. Just like Christy you should read my post over again. The post was about how cruel she can be to Kiefer. I still can't find the cruel words Christy used to describe what Kiefer said in the article. Can you?
I think you both should grow up, come back to reality and stop being as cruel as Christy and the word is called cheating...not...being able to keep his dick in his pants. How cruel as a Kiefer fan you both are, you sound like her but maybe your not a Kiefer fans...
Would love to hear Christy/Dillon express that term on the BB site. OMG what would they think of her? How deceitful she can be to bash Kiefer on this site and be so sweet on the BB site. She is a two-faced bitch, a rat and a cruel one at that. Kiefer would be ashamed with someone like her for a fan.
Kalin
Louise at 2.31am, I have worked in mental health for 16 years. I have worked with many different psychiatrists, and i have never seen any of them use photographs to infer anything about a person or people. The written word however, now thats another matter :-)
I'm not a member of BB site although I do check it out for pics now and again but from what I have seen I have to agree with you Kalin.People on there seem very sweet to eachother and then Christy comes here and lets rip.That's why I'm confused.If it's an issue with K.P Why not come to us there?Or is it that she just wants to dis-credit us to as many people as possible?And Linda you are right, we can say what we like on KP wthout fear of being reprimanded and I'm sure if people want to say they like Sib on there it's fine but it is when things get bitchy and crude that the problems start.Louise
I'm not a member of BB site although I do check it out for pics now and again but from what I have seen I have to agree with you Kalin.People on there seem very sweet to eachother and then Christy comes here and lets rip.That's why I'm confused.If it's an issue with K.P Why not come to us there?Or is it that she just wants to dis-credit us to as many people as possible?And Linda you are right, we can say what we like on KP wthout fear of being reprimanded and I'm sure if people want to say they like Sib on there it's fine but it is when things get bitchy and crude that the problems start.Louise
Ursula, perhaps I'm wrong then but I thought photographs could be used by Psychologists to get a picture of the persoanlities/But if I'm wrong I do not mind admitting it:) And the written word?
The written or spoken word obviously gives evidence about a persons thought processes, their content and form and therefore evidence of thought disorders or delusions. However I was being a bit facetious with that last line:-)
I would just like to add, like many of you I enjoy reading a number of Kiefer sites. We don't have to agree, I have stated before that I have nothing against Siobhan and like seeing them together. However would it be possible for us all to take a step back and cool things a little ? It's nearly the new year lol, we could all make a fresh start !
Yes I think that is a great idea.Louise
Yes I think that is a great idea.Louise
Yes I think that is a great idea.Louise
Christy, I'm not meaning to intentionally antagonise you here, although I have in the past, but have you got a multiple personality disorder?Since many of the post's here are unbelievably like your's.Ursula for example uses many of your phrases."states this,states that.We don't have to agree.."Plus they are long winded.Are you only one person?I have seen this question asked to you before which is why I ask.It's very odd.I also find that you or whoever is anonymous seem to claim to be an expert or have experience in every field.Psychiatry/health issues/relationships...pissing people off..It's endless.
But that said if Christy is willing maybe we can retreat and regroup for the new year?
Louise
If you think keeping his Dick in his pants is crude, you should go to some of the fan sites, certain fans love to write pronographic stories about Kiefer and they don't even have to decency to at least use a fictional character like Jack Bauer, but no they use Kiefer and it is just disgusting the things they write about. At least he admitted fooling around, ok so maybe the term is a little "not nice" but better than writing about Kiefers fictional sex life with themselves. Is is almost like a physical violation.
Kalin, it's you who needs to reread. I didn't say that you said that Kiefer is "like me"... I said that you said that Kiefer is "like Siobhan"... just as you did say. And I also said that, imo, I have absolutely no way of knowing whether or not Siobhan is like Kiefer because I don't know anything about her except for third hand rumors.
Also... yes, I abide by the rules on Benny's board. That's a requirement of posting there; just like not ever saying a single non-slagging word about Siobhan is a requirement of posting on Kiefer's Place. Those are just the rules on those sites and Benny and LadySutherland both have a right to run their boards the way that they want to run them.
Linda, yep, I know that you despise Siobhan and that you've given specific reasons for it. I don't think there's a "problem" with Kiefer's Place. I was just saying, to whomever I was talking to at the time, that it's silly to pretend that speech is totally free there... anymore than it's totally free at Benny's.
I don't think that there are any other places (that I know of anyway) where there are rules about speaking "for" or "against" Siobhan. That doesn't mean that everyone agrees - either way - at other places... kinda like we don't all agree here. ;)
Would I post that I believe that Kiefer is an alcoholic and that he's always been a womanizer (as represented by the phrase "can't keep his dick in his pants") on Benny's if the rules there allowed it? Yes. Because I think both of those things are true.
I also think that Kiefer is beautiful, sexy, intelligent, kind, big-hearted, goofy, sweet, lovable-to-the-high-heavens and fascinatingly complex.
I believe ALL of those things to be true about him. It's possible to think the world of someone AND think that they've got issues. In Kiefer's case, I think his issues have issues... but I also think that he's a Kiefery delight. Those two thoughts aren't mutually exclusive.
By the way, to any and all who are up in arms because they think I'm trying to tell them what/how to think... um... no. I'm expressing how *I* think. When I express what I think and it's in opposition to you that doesn't mean that I think it's what YOU have to think. It just means it's what I think... and that I disagree with you. As you disagree with me.
That's really not such a big deal.
Louise - no, I don't have multiple personalities. I post as Christy here, dillon on Benny's & the Krew, and annabella on the Fox board. I'm not ursula or anyone else here you think I might be. When I post here, I post as Christy. Always. And, yeah, I wish that everyone would post their names when they post here... even people who agree with me. :)
(Speaking of which, an aside, if my guess about who that person is is correct... my bad! It's 're', not 'er' in IMDb.)
ursula - I know, I know... I'll step away soon. But egads... ;) :)
Oh - and Louise (and others) - I'm all for regrouping for the new year. Truly! :)
(But, c'mon... you didn't really expect me not to respond to being accused of posting as multiple people here, did you? I mean... would you have?! ;))
I think there is a solution to all of this and that is that we all stay away from here and perhaps christy you may benefit from your own site and I'm not being a bitch there. It may be good for you and saves us all bickering or maybe we could all have our own sites and then we can run them how we please. :)
christy you suggested that we were so i responded and yes i was hoping you would.I think its truce time?
Ah, 9:59am - what fun would all of those individual sites where everyone agrees really be?
Disagreeing is part of life. Calling people who disagree with you "bitches" perhaps not so much... ;)
Christy I really think everyone is ready to calm this down now.You seem to be irate but to be fair you have brought alot of this on yourself.And I admit I called you a bitch because I think it was out of line what you did and hoped that you were decent enough to apologise. Why don't you have a think about what you want to do?Louise
... oh - and keep meaning to say thanks to CL for the scoop about the Kiefer & Siobhan pic having to be from sometime before March 2008 - thanks!
... and, Louise (I think at 10:02, right?)... sure! :D
Where 'truce' doesn't mean we agree - because, of course, we don't... and that's fine - but hopefully we can disagree without being disagreeable (to quote the U.S.'s president elect). :)
And I think you know that you weren't called a bitch for merely "disagreeing" with someone.Louise
And I think you know that you weren't called a bitch for merely "disagreeing" with someone.Louise
agree to disagree? Yes OK
Hey Christy, hope you had a nice holiday. I agree with what you stated regarding Kiefer in your 9:35 thread. Kiefer is definitely not perfect. I have always thought you hit the nail on the head with "his issues have issues" cause I believe that is true. Kiefer definitely has a drinking problem whatever you want to call it and he has for some 20 years. He has also had commitment problems and he has had those for some 20 years - just go back and look at his life with Camilia. And to the person who asked why he stayed in the "official marriage with Kelly" for so long, I have my theories but I wish someone could tell me for sure on that one cause he clearly saw other women especially Catherine and IMHO, the divorce only went final in May because Kelly pushed it through; I don't believe personally that Kiefer would have.
Btw, there is one site that I can think of where all is printed and said on Kiefer. The good, the bad and the ugly and that's what I prefer but I also have to respect the wants of those who own their own sites. Afterall, it's their sites to operate as they wish....
Ok, I am ready to confess who I am, so Christy won't have to take all the crap. It's me ILK aka Pam. I am sure it is shock to some people. but oh well sorry
Sorry forgot to post this as well in my response to an earlier post to Margaret. I understood the analogy to the pebble in shoe. However, none of us really know what Kiefer's state of mind was or has been since the event of his DUI arrest and jail time. I personally believe this was a traumatic event in his life and brought very stressful and trying times to him. I could see in the filming of 24 from November 2007 that his face looked strained to me...I am sure he was ashamed of what he had done and especially since it was at a work related event and Fox was connected with it.
I personally believe that when Kiefer came out of jail he was in a scared and vulnerable state which may have caused him to push forth with Siobhan who may have just been in the right place at the right time. Does this mean he wasn't attracted to her, NO but it could mean he forced the issue and may be why he put it out there like he did. I believe he was in a state of wanting and needing to please anyone and everyone and was willing to do what was necessary even to show he was now a stable person with a stable woman in his life and he no longer would be hanging out and drinking in bars......just a guess on my part
Yep, Linda... I respect that the people who run their own sites have a right to run them as they wish too.
Though I don't have a strong opinion one way or another about whether it was Kelly or Kiefer who finally pushed through the divorce (to me, it could have been either of them), my theory about why they stayed married for so long always has been that, as long as he was legally married to her, he couldn't oops!-accidentally end up married to someone else on a drunken weekend. As long as she was okay with staying legally married to him, that would've been a strong safeguard against that! :) Who knows, of course, but that always seemed like one possibility to me. Early on, i.e., after the first divorce filing in 2000, it seemed like they may've been periodically trying again... but, later on and especially after the second filing in 2004, not so much.
I had (and still am having - yay for being off all week!) a wonderful holiday and hope that you did too!
Pam from Benny's?? Hi Pam. Long time no speak...
LOL, Christy. Yep, I think we have discussed that as one possibility. Maybe even used it as an excuse not to marry even in the more serious situations, e.g. Catherine cause I am sure she pushed for it.....
Linda I agree that he has not seemed himself since his jail time and I think we have discussed this before.I'm sure he must have felt embarssed in front of his peers as you say at FOX etc.I thought in January especially he seemed to be suffering as I'm sure we all would be.Can't imagine how hard it must have been for him.I always thought that Catherine wanted more from the relationship but he seemed to keep her on the bench probably becuase he was still married to Kelly. I don't believe that he would get drunk and marry somebody off spec though.I think he just wasn't ready to admit to the world it was 100% over with Kelly.Louise
Yep, Louise. That's a good point about the divorce with Kelly. Once that thing got finalized he had to admit to himself that he once again failed at marriage. Btw, I have also thought part of the Siobhan circus as I call it with regard to the parade out of Pastis and Waverly Inn was a distraction to the official news of that divorce. If you remember it got barely a mention and it was immediately linked with marriage to Siobhan. If there was no Siobhan out there Kiefer would have most likely been described as a two time loser who just got out of jail.
Might be how he and his PR people were thinking.
Hi LInda and yes its me from Benny's and yes long time no talk. And I agree with what you are saying as a possibility.
Hi Linda, I agree with you concerning some aspects of the publicity surrounding Kiefer and Siobhan in April, but I'm sure you won't be surprised that overall my "take " on it is slightly different. I think kiefer did find the jail sentence traumatic and embarrassing and therefore did agree to the various "coming out" pictures with Siobhan in the spring to show that he was doing well and had "learnt his lesson ". However i don't think the relationship that these pictures seemed to imply was fake, there is evidence that he may have been seeing Siobhan discreetly since the previous autumn at least. My point is, Kiefer did go along with this publicity for PR reasons.However when the reaction to his various public appearances over the summer was good he felt able to go back to his preferred stance of trying to keep relationships lowkey.Thats why I think things have taken a less public stance now, but ofcourse my view is coloured by the fact I do like them together.
Louise and Linda your response about Kelly and Kiefer in my opinion couldn't have been said any better then that. They were always my thoughts but you both expressed them so much better and to a T.
As far as Kiefer and Siobhan I see the same pattern Kiefer had with Kelly, Catherine, Tricia and other women and its a repeat where nothing has changed in his life. If anything I feel since Kiefer lives in NYC it is easier for him to drink and party and he seems to be doing more of it. Maybe some day that special woman will come into his life and he will be "willing" to really change his habits. Maybe it will hit him like a ton of bricks. I have seen it happen before with my friends. I wish him the best of course.
Thanks Kalin
Actually Kalin you said that in a better way than me totally agree I just don't feel he has ever found that "special" person although I think Julia and Kelly may have been close.Louise
Hey, Pam! You weren't my guess... ;) Good to "see" you and hope you're doing well! :D
... and, just to confirm what you said up-thread, we sure haven't always agreed... and, yep, that's always been just fine for both of us. :)
Hey Christy, and yep doing great thanks
Yes, we can agree to disagree
Pam
ursula, (also unsurprisingly :)), I agree with you that there's nothing beyond-explanation about why Kiefer might've been willing - eager, even - to do a bit of "coming out" publicity with Siobhan and now be more comfortable with keeping it (whatever it is) closer to the vest.
I don't know that that's what's happening (obviously!), but it doesn't not make sense to me if it is, either.
Linda - just to be clear, though... I do understand what you're saying about how Kiefer might've been more willing to do things for publicity when he first came out of jail. I agree with that. That is to say, I think that Kiefer's return to the public stage was very carefully orchestrated and I think that he was a fully participating part of the orchestration. But that's a long time ago now and he's had a great many things go well in his life since then... yay, him! :D
I just don't think that's mutually exclusive with there possibly being a 'real' relationship between them.
Today has disappeared for me in a blinding flash-have we any idea when the latest bar photo was taken?
Do you mean the one with Siobhan? If so, CL posted up-thread that she saw it on a blog that last was updated in March 2008... so sometime before that, which makes summer-ish 2007 seem like a good bet.
Thanks Christy
Ursula, even though Kiefer did well by the end of the summer it was "all work related". The pics at the beach were also staged as Margaret described to us because at the end of summer write-ups for sex pics etc:,but as you seen he only got mention by himself in the mags not with Siobhan. His fans are the only ones who seen the other pics of them together. When I mentioned work related he did very well with 24:Redemption, she was not apart of him getting picked for the Golden Globes or Screen Actors Guild Award. Kiefer is a great actor he did this without her. The Hall of Fame well Kiefer recieved that a few years ago and she was not there to get credit for that or at the event either.
In his personal life Ursula as you can see she hasn't changed anything there for Kiefer. You have to admit Kiefer is in the same pattern with her as he was with his other women. In my opinion he is keeping his life lowkey because he doesn't need her anymore. Maybe your view is coloured by the fact you like them together but by my view Kiefer is still following the same pattern as he did before. Its Sad so sad but we shouldn't give up on him meeting someone special and I hope it will hit him like a ton of bricks. When he does meet this special person and know matter what happens, you know he will never use her as he did Siobhan. Kiefer keeps the people he loves the most very private. A good example of that would be his daughter. Kiefer is with her alot but how many pics did we see of them together even though she was away for 6 weeks or more. Not many! Kalin
Hey Ursula, I actually don't disagree with you in part about the relationship. Just because I talk about the publicity aspect doesn't mean I think it was/is all a fake per se but I do think it is odd for whatever reason that Kiefer would agree to put a "so special" lady out there just to help his own image / publicity machine. I also think it is odd that no matter how supposedly private he wants to be in a relationship it is beyond dishonest on his part to pretend like she doesn't even exist when asked specific questions about her in interviews and to outright so coldly, IMHO, deny engagement rumors, etc. And not to repeat myself again but I don't think the ommission from the Walk of Fame is just a small thing. In fact, I think the overnight San Diego stay was to appease her for not including her in that Walk of Fame. I think this thing about them having agreements, etc. just doesn't fly. That's not how I see relationships working private or otherwise. When two people love each other they want to be together and they want to be a part of each others lives especially if we are to believe that these two are together for so long. Ursula, I guess the other place we disagree is not with Kiefer having someone special in his life. It's who the someone special might be. I just for all the reasons stated before don't like the look of Siobhan and I don't mean physically. There is something about her that bugs me, that's all.
This debate goes on with all Kiefer's girlfriends. Some fans hated Catherine. I liked her. Some fans hated Tricia. I loved her. I thought Kiefer looked adorable with her at the bowling ally party. That was real and natural to me. I don't think her 4 year old was part of an act and it looked sweet. Everything about Siobhan looks fake to me. Maybe it's her fashionista part that makes me see phony, don't know. I just see it...
Just to add about Tricia. I know there is some thought that they were only friends and this may have been publicity related and I could see aspects of that being true. But I will tell you something, IMHO, that was some acting cause Kiefer actually looked happy and relaxed with her in all the situations they were pictured in and that includes the chance meeting they seem to have had at the shopping center in July 2007. Some said Kiefer seemed standoffish with her but I thought he looked himself. He was laughing and joking and at one point doing funnies with his ciggy which was so cute. My guess is that Kiefer was aware on all these times that cameras were on him. I just never have seen him doing anything even remotely close to how he acted with Tricia to how he is pictured with Siobhan....maybe he is so determined to be distant when cameras are around but that's strange to me at least.
Linda, I know we disagree about whether or not it's possible that they are together and it was fine with both of them that she not be at the Walk of Fame thing... and that's totally cool.
The only thing that I wanted to say about what you said there, though, is that I very much disagree that there's any one rule (or for that matter any finite number of rules) about "when two people love each other, they _______" however you fill in the blank. imo, every relationship is unique... whether we're talking about Kiefer or one another or the man on the moon. :)
Well both of you can go at it all you want Linda and Christy but the only one making any sense is Kalin. She is right! Kiefer is still following his same old pattern with women. Still drinking and partying with or without them. What happen to her stablilizing influence in his life? What a joke!! Do you realize that she has never been to any of Kiefers events but he went to a few of hers. It looks like she is asking him out not the other way around.
Hey Christy, I am actually not even disagreeing that they may still be together. We don't have any proof that they aren't so I actually assume that they are. I just say it is a very weird, IMHO, relationship but probably normal in Hollywood terms and that I think Kiefer has in his own way manipulated the situation and has even mislead to advance/enhance his own image. I think if they are in a relationship then it was/is unnecessary for him to act as though she doesn't even exist. One instance I think of is when he is asked a perfectly innocent question about whether she would go to see Mirrors. Heck, he acted as if he didn't even know who she was. Or when he is asked a direct question from the interviewer mentioning her by name and he states he is "single and happy". Though single is technically correct we all know he has been seen with Siobhan. He put her out there for that to happen. IMHO, I see no excuses for that. Just acknowledge her and say it's a private matter and he would like to keep it that way; that's all. I am not asking him to parade out the relationship. Oh that's right he already did that on his own, LOL. I am just asking him to be straight with his fanbase and not think we are idiots who don't have eyes to see with. That is if there is a relationship. We really don't know. I guess time will tell for sure...LOL, although we've been saying that too for an enternity it seems!!
P.S. and yep, we do disagree about what is acceptable in a relationship although along with my ideas and your ideas you need to add a third set of ideas which is Hollywood's, LOL!!
9:20 PM, where have you been? I agree with everything you said and have been saying it myself especially about the events and her participation!!
Kalin in my opinion hit a homerun. One other thing I would like to add to this thread is that Christy said, when Kiefer drinks he can't seem to keep is ---- in his pants. I'm sure that pattern hasn't changed either. Its another reason Kiefer likes to keep things lowkey.
Linda I totally respect your comments!
Linda, one of the (in this arena anyway many ;)) things we disagree about is that Kiefer is under any obligation to do or say anything at all one way or another... about Siobhan or anything or anyone else in his life. I really believe that he gives us what he owes us - his brilliant performances - and that everything else (and, imo, there's a great deal of lovely "else" in his case) is just gravy.
9:20 and 10:01 and Linda - you're assuming that I ever bought the standard-issue celeb relationship diddly-doo (as in "every time a celebrity with a wild reputation shows up with a new relationship, it's The One Who Will Tame Him/Her"), but I didn't. If Kiefer and Siobhan are in a relationship, it seems pretty clear to me that he's the handful he's always been... and that's totally unsurprising to me. He's Kiefer! :)
Meant to say above...
Linda, for me, it's not even about adding a 'third set of rules'; it's that I literally don't think that any two relationships are exactly the same and follow exactly the same patterns. To me, the only "rule" is that the relationship works for the two people in it.
I have no idea if that's the case for Kiefer and Siobhan.
Just wanted to clarify that it's that I genuinely don't believe that there's any such constant as "when two people love each other they _________." I really don't. imo, life and love are just more complex and multi-textured to conform to that... in NY or SF or Hollywood or Des Moines or Bangkok or on and on. :)
Don't mean to offend anyone (will say that right upfront)but have to make a few observations. Anyone who thinks they are just friends are, IMO, deluding themselves. They are obviously having some sort of relationship.(at least that is how it seems to me) But I will also say that anyone who tells me these two are in love is also a little off the charts. As I think Linda said above, not parading your girlfriend out there because you want a more private relationship is one thing, but almost denying her existance is too bizarre to comprehend. One would question why they even bother at all with it in that case. I think she's convenient for him. He must have a comfort level of some sort with her, and when he feels like going to dinner with her or something and he gives her a call, she comes running. She's a sure thing. Seems like a perfect setup for him. I do think it was probably more in the beginning, but you can see an obvious change in their relationship now. and the fact that he doesn't have to go out looking for sex must be a nice thing for him too. He gets all the perks without much effort. Can't beat that.
9:20PM, 10:01PM and Kalin, yep we are in total agreement and one of you ladies mentioned the events. I know some argue that Kiefer and her agree maybe not to attend events but you'll notice that the two events they have attended have been gallery showings of photogs who work for Allure. So she seems perfectly willing to bring him along perhaps to show off her famous boyfriend to her Fashionista friends, LOL.
Christy, yep we disagree on what he may owe his fans. As I have stated and others have stated Kiefer enjoys lots of benefits on our dime, and he chose, IMHO, to put out this relationship to benefit himself further. Therefore, I believe he at the very least owes his fans who clearly see the pictures an honest response to very direct questions. I am not asking him to spill all the details just have some respect for the fans......
Linda I think as we have discussed before that he feels that if he comes out publicly about this relationship/friendship/f*** buddy thing then he will have to show commitment to her and I don't believe he feels strongly enough about her to do that.As he himself said he is having fun at the moment although I do believe that she wants more and maybe thinks that if she hangs around long enough he might fall in love with her. But..I agree it would be nice to know either way:) He knows part of his business is the media and his fans will be interested in this but I'm not sure when it comes down to the nitty griity whether we can actually say that he "owes" us it because we go to work but we don't expect to have to discuss our private life and he does deserve a private life but on the other hand we keep him employed in a way so it would be nice to know!lol.I can see both sides of the coin here.I think it's fair to say though that we won't see them married and riding off into the sunset anytime soon whatever their relationship...
She looks like a high priced hooker to me. He won't take her to the walk of fame but brings her out there 3 days later for a romp in a luxury hotel? Wonder how she explains all this to her fashionista friends. "oh you see, we have an agreement that i won't be seen with him anywhere important." lolol ..if you believe that then i have some swampland in florida to sell you.
lol 9.51 Perhaps you are onto something!
Hey Louise, you know I think "owes" is probably too strong a word for me to use and to defend Kiefer cause I do really like him, LOL I do feel he handles his celebrity way above all others and actually he could write the handbook on the matter. I guess it is frustrating in a Kiefery watching way as it of course has nothing really to do with real life for any of us, just to try and figure this whole silly thing out, LOL!!
I think if he bothered to do the MySpace Page he might as well use it for this sort of thing, LOL!!! but he probably won't, LOL!!!!
9:51AM, not to mention her family. Isn't her dad some influential high powered doctor in La Jolla a rather exclusive area???
Btw, I actually happen to see a news special on those types of women and they actually spoke about how they were given an apartment to live in so they would be there waiting, flown around the world first class and only stayed in the most ritzy hotels. Of course, they didn't mention Denny's, LOL but I am sure Siobhan gets her fair share of expensive restaurants, wink, wink!!
Hey Linda, How brilliant would that be??Can you imagine how busy MySpace would be?!lol Might save us all some arguments too :)
And Anna-Where did you see that news prgram.Sign me up quick! lol Wink Wink
Linda, you know that his MySpace page is just a PR thing and not something that he reads/actually posts to himself, right?
... and now people are calling a person who they don't know and don't know anything about except third hand (and beyond) rumors a hooker. Wow. Speaks well (or not) of your opinions of Kiefer too.
... and 9:51, yes, I do believe that it's possible that she and Kiefer both could be perfectly fine with the degree of public-ness/non-public-ness of their relationship... and trust me when I tell you that I'm not much of a swampland in Florida buyer. ;)
Just out of curiosity, a question for those who think that Kiefer doesn't want anything to do with her (except, apparently, sex on demand)...
Why, then, would he attend events with her... whether at her request or otherwise? If he's paying her (whether directly or with a place to live, trips, etc...), why would he 'owe' her that?
Those puzzle pieces don't fit together to me.
ya see Christy, this is a perfect example of your judgement of others. you critisize me for making a statement about someone I don't know, and here you come judging me. Give it a break. I love Kiefer just fine and don't need someone like you lecturing me. Maybe you should spend more time on your own personal relaitionships rather than trying to intimidate everyone else about how they think.
Attends events with her? hmmm, haven't been too many of those. Maybe sometimes he just wants a happy hooker instead of a whining one.
Hey Christy, actually didn't he tell Dietcoke that he dictates the MySpace Page to Jude cause he can't type but it is indeed his words or did I misread that?
And, of course, the thing about him detailing his relationships was absolutely tongue and cheek. I don't think Kiefer has any designs on putting that info anywhere anytime soon, LOL!!
10:55 - I'm not 'lecturing' you. I'm stating what I think. You do that, don't you? If you say things, people are going to respond to them. That's life. I can live with that. Can you? :)
10:59 - No, there haven't been too many of those... but I was directly addressing the point made up-thread that he goes to things with her, but not vice versa. And I'm pretty darned certain that high-priced hookers, kind of by definition, don't whine. After all, they can be easily replaced, yes?
Hey Linda ... and all! Happy New Year.
I'd like to take a stab at explaining just a couple of the reasons why people might be suspicious of Siobhan. First, she moved into Kiefers apartment in NY too fast. If she moved in as more than a friend or new owner, then, imo, she took advantage of a man who must have been vulnerable. They only met at the end of July, and there's little evidence that it was serious before the DUI (he was photographed on a date with a blonde in mid-Sept, for example). Also, if he wants to keep the relationshp under the media radar, she isn't co-operating. She wore rings on her ring finger at times when she knew there was at least a fairly good chance of being photographed, which hiked the engagement rumors and forced Kiefer to to dispell them, multiple times. If Kiefer encouraged her to wear a ring and then denied the rumors, he's a bit of a cad. I don't think he is a cad, not even a bit, so I believe she wore the rings on her own. She also seems to have deliberately interrupted his MV interview.
Yes, he is a big boy who can take care of himself, but we are all vulnerable sometimes, and I think people believe she took advantage of that and created an obligation. Maybe not, but the optics leave something to be desired.
I'm sure they can be replaced Christy. I don't have much up front personal knowledge of them though. Maybe she suits his needs for now and he doesn't mind a little whining, who knows.
Hey, Linda. I thought he said that "Jude did it", but maybe he did say that he dictated it to him. :)
I just don't think there's any chance that Kiefer keeps up with the MySpace at all. Even the fact that Jude did it for him speaks to me of its PR quotient. iirc, its appearance coincided with either a BBoP or a HoneyHoney release (I think the latter, yes?).
Re: the tongue-in-cheekness, yep, I figured! ;) And, yep, I can pretty much more imagine flying to the moon on my own pair of wings sprouted from my head than I can imagine Kiefer posting about his relationship-life on MySpace... or, really, talking about it at all... which, to bring us full circle to the conversation about whether he's likely to talk about Siobhan (or anyone) publicly, is why it's never surprising to me when he doesn't answer those questions or talk about it. I just don't think he's gonna do it... at least not any time soon... whether he ever does... about Siobhan or anyone else in the future. Maaaaaaaaybe, if he ever gets married again, but I don't necessarily think there's a lot of chance of that happening either.
AMEN Alexa!!!! I think a lot of people might share these feelings. Another one for me was how quickly she got that divorce from her husband. I think I read she filed in November and it was granted in December? Amazing how quickly that happened. Just in time to be available when Kiefer got out of jail. I would not trust this broad as far as I could throw her.
Alexa, Happy New Year and as always you hit all the high notes!!!
Yes, Yes and Yes to all you have said and then some. You've certainly captured all my reasons plus others. Btw, I didn't know about the blond but there were certainly more than "friendly" personal accounts of him with the "lady in scrubs" in the fall. As for how people describe Siobhan, I can only speak for myself here. Without knowing her I can describe her on several instances among them Pastis, Waverly Inn and Denny's looking rather let's say not like a very classy lady!! I don't have to know her to make that determination. In fact, if you even go back to the pictures of her having lunch with Kiefer in August 2007 she seems to be bearing something, wink, wink. Seems to me she was setting the bait for a cute little fishy in the sea named Kiefer, LOL!!!!
Just a question, instead of answering a question about his lovelife "I'm single and happy" (if we are to believe he is in a happy relationship with Siobhan). Why not just say "I have a special person in my life but prefer to keep that private." That would solve the problem and make his woman feel happy too. I can't imagine being in a serious relationship with him and hearing him deny it every time he is asked about it. Not when there is a perfectly good substitute that would make everyone happy.
Hi Alexa. I totally think you're right about why some folks feel suspicious of Siobhan. It's just that neither of those things raise those particular flags for me.
I think that rings are just rings. Kiefer wears - and always has - rings on that ring finger when he's not married too. To me, engagement denials are pretty much pro-forma in celebrity 'news' land and not a big deal. And, imo, we don't have any clue about what the specific nature of their relationship was, whether/when/why she moved in with him, or what the nature of their relationship is now.
So, while I get (truly!) that that's what some people see/perceive, I just genuinely don't. Then again, I also don't think that Kiefer looks unhappy (or bored or irritated or whatever other negative things) in her presence... or that she looks like a phony (she may be, but I, personally, don't perceive that).
All of these things are just honest differences of perception/opinion... and, as I know we all agree, none of us knows for sure one way or another which of these perceptions are or aren't correct. :)
Alexa, re: the date with a blonde in September 2007, do you mean the woman in the dress where Kiefer's in a blue shirt and it's around the Emmys?
Re: the MV thing, I don't think there's much question that that was intentional, but I think that it was agreed upon by all involved (i.e., that Kiefer was part of it too)... and I would bet my house (literally) that, if Kiefer had wanted that part taken out of the article, it would have been.
11:29am - you're making the assumption that she cares whether he says he's single or in a relationship and, while that's fine (because we all believe what we believe), I don't share that assumption. Really.
Again, it's just differences in ways of perceiving things... and there's no crime in having differences! But it's not a given that, if they are in any kind of serious relationship (and who knows?!), she's at all unhappy with the way that he's handling it publicly. She may be... but, equally possible, she may not be.
Maybe I am just dense but I don't think so. Christy, I agree with you that the interuption in the MV interview was rehearsed and I think we also agree that at least the Pastis and Waverly Inn was orchastated and I personally believe that those photogs were not at that Denny's by accident so why all the show? Which is it? He wants the relationship under the radar or he doesn't? Can you also understand why to me anyway this makes him look rather foolish and not forthcoming and also makes a relationship between them, if there is one, looked staged and actually weird to me anyway.......I don't know - staged appearances together, agreements not to appear at public events, rehearsed interuptions at interviews. LOL, for someone like Kiefer who claims to be "real" he sure is acting strangely.......
Ya see Linda, what you say just makes sense. All these agreements, arrangements, staged events, whatever you want to call them, make for one very confused situation. And you can can say whatever you want Christy, this is not indicative of a healthy happy relationship. And I don't think for one minute she is happy having to be kept in semi-hiding. Just notice how often she puts her arm through his without him ever responding to it. I think she's putting up with this whole charade because she's still thinking she can make it happen her way if she persists long enough.
okay, just reread your post Christy. So you agree the MV thing was staged with his approval? Why on God's green earth would he want to do that if he was trying to keep their relationship a secret? It was so ridiculous to be honest.
Hey, Linda... I understand that what you're saying is true for you... I totally do! I think that maybe where we differ is that, as 'real' as I think that Kiefer is in so so so many ways, I've never thought that everything he says in interviews is The Whole Story. I mean, do you really believe that the only reason he had his shirt off in the peony pics was because a waiter spilled wax on it? I don't. ;) Anymore than I think there's any 'logical' explanation to the pants-drop at Dimples, the striptease in NZ, the photo with his shirt off at a bar that appeared on Perez Hilton, etc. No 'logical' explanation other than that a drunk Kiefer is an exhibitionist Kiefer, anyway. And I don't think we're likely to hear him give that explanation any time soon. :)
... and that's just one example. Others: by the time Kiefer & Kelly were in In Style magazine as a happy, content couple, their marriage was in trouble. The chances that he cheated on/lied to Kelly just once (as he more or less implies in his Playboy interview) are, imo, reallllly low. He doesn't just drink to blow off steam (and, as in denial as he is about his drinking, I truly believe he knows that), etc etc. Publicity isn't captial-T Truth. It never has been and, while he's remarkably open in some ways, Kiefer's publicity life isn't significantly different from that of other celebrities.
I know that we'll never see eye to eye on this, but I think it's entirely possible (not that I know that it's true; just that I think it's possible) that he (and she) are willing both to 'use' the relationship AND that it's a 'real' relationship... with real affection between them.
Ok, I just can't stay away from here and I know I should be anyway here goes. I personally don't think she looks like a high paid hocker, I may not agree with some of her fasion choices but overall I think she is beautiful. And most inportatnly and here I go agreeing with Christy again. lol. We don't know how she feels about the realtionship as far as not being invited to certain events, maybe she was but she does have a job to attend to even thought some of you think she doesn't. Any way, we have some good friend, very happily married for about 15 years now they have 2 kids, but prior to that when they went out partying, either together of seperately they on purpose would not wear thier wedding rings, and woudln't necessarily hang around each other, yet they were madly in love and still are, POint being maybe just maybe she is a very independent woman and is using him for some fun also. maybe she is in love maybe he is in love who knows. Also how do we know that she didn't wear rings on her left had before she starting dating Kiefer? just some thoughts. Pam
12:09 - I know that you perceive/believe what you perceive/believe, but we just disagree. I don't know for a fact what their situation is or how either one of them feels about it. All I'm saying is that it's not at all inconceivable to me that it's an ongoing serious relationship (which, this being Kiefer, certainly doesn't necessarily mean it's monogamous!) and that they're both fine with how it's publicly presented. I know that it's not conceivable to you. I'm just saying that it is to me. We just disagree. Not a big deal! :)
12:13 (not sure if you're also 12:09) - yes, I think it was staged and it struck me as totally publicity-typical, i.e., when I read it, it didn't strike me as "ridiculous" at all. Why? Because it keeps the word that he has a girlfriend in the public eye (and, remember, most of the public isn't thinking about it much one way or another... they, whatever the tiny circulation/consumption of Men's Vogue was, would just read it, take it in, and go on to the next sentence) without him actually talking about it himself... which is something that he's said he's not going to do (in general, that is).
Ya see Christy just when you seemed to calm down yet again you start reading too much into things.For Godsake really can't we just have a damn chat without you getting so serious!Linda was being tongue in cheek as was I,it's called having a laugh!Just when we seem to be having a decent chat you have to show up reading too much into things.People like you are dangerous you look for things that aren't there it's utterly ridiculous and frankly I wish you would grow those ears and fly to the moon or Mars,actually Outer Mongolia would do.Whoever is posting anonymous I agree with you and Alexa and Linda too. It's obvious to me from the relationship experience I have had and from the people I know that IF they are still spending time togther its a convenience thing.Just sex!with abit of eating out and a few events thrown in so they dont have to go on their own.It does happen and we have all probably had these relationships in the past I certainly have and I'm not afraid to admit it.And as far as the hooker thing goes yet again christy reads too much into it.Sib to me is a woman who likes the nice things in life and demands it even if I think she is common.Its like Victoria Beckham loadsa money,total snob,fame junkie with no class.There are loads of them about Christy.Maybe you should get out more.And btw-generally the most successful women in these instances keep their maiden name.She hasn't from what we have seen which tells me something..
Louise, I think everything here was going just fine... people disagreeing civilly... until you came in just now and personally attacked me, that is.
But that's okay too. It's clear that, for whatever reason(s), you can't help from doing that. I don't take it personally. Life's too short. :)
okay, where to begin. Christy, it's illogical for me to think that he would be insinuating her into the MV article for PR purposes if he really cares about her in a more serious way. (other than just a friend with benefits, let's say) If he felt this was a relationship that had more permanent possibilities, why would he be using it in this way? Another question I would ask is that in one of your posts you say you think it unlikely that he will marry again. So how long does this PR charade continue? Does she ever get to be a real girlfirend/partner who shares in all the aspects of his life? I could almost go along with the theory proposed by some that they started off strong together, but when the marriage rumors started they decided to reign it in a bit. That would be IF there was an end in sight ... say they're getting married. Which as far as I know they have not so far.
Maybe she doesn't want to be serious either, has anyone ever thought of that. Why do we assume that she isn't ok with the relationship is or isn't going.
Pam
12:57 - we just disagree about whether or not it's possible for this relationship to have a PR-aspect *and* be genuinely affectionate. That doesn't have to mean that either of is illogical. Just that we see this differently. I believe that he really loved Kelly and I also believe that he did PR-related things with her. I don't think that those two things are mutually exclusive in celebrity-land. That said, I don't know how he and Siobhan feel about one another. I think it's possible both that it's just friends with benefits (and, Louise, I agree that there's nothing wrong or weird about that if it's the case) or that it's more serious or that it's some different combinations of things that none of us know because we're not privy to their privates lives/conversations/feelings/etc.
If it's serious and they've agreed about how public it is/isn't, I simply don't think it's a given that she feels like she's not a "real" girlfriend/partner. I think that there are far more hours of the day, days of the week, weeks of the month and months of the year that we *don't* see of Kiefer's life than that we do see... and that we don't know what their relationship is/isn't in those hours/days/weeks/months... or how either of them feels about whatever it is.
Is it possible that she's not happy with the situation? Sure. I'm just saying that I believe that it's also possible that she's fine with it. And it's totally fine that you don't agree with me about that. :)
11:29 who is the perfectly good substitute? and also I dont think that is Kiefer said there is a special person in my life but it is private would satisfy most of you, most of us want details but until he gives them we won't have them. I have to admit that I wasn't fond of her at first , not sure why, but the more she gets torn down here, the more I feel the need to defend her, The things being said are said like it is the absolute truth, when it isn't , we don't know her. Sure she like the finer things in life, most of us do, and the fact is, she has a job at a high fashion magazine, she comes from a wealthy family and she married wealthy, That doesn't make her bad, How do we know that the guy she married wasn't a jerk, maybe he was maybe he wasn't. al I know is that none of us will ever have a chance with Kiefer, and some of us don't want one either, So why does it matter. It is his life.
Pam
I agree, Pam. Of course, we don't know either way but, in my mind, that's certainly one of the many possibilities...
We don't know that for sure Pam, but it certainly doesn't appear to be the case. Just read some of what Alexa had to say. Also, this is a woman who appears to have gone right from rich daddy to rich men. She was supposedly living with a Chanel model when David came around and she dropped the other guy in a hurry. Then she wasn't married to David all that long before she started her push for Kiefer. She was actually still living with him at the time she started dating Kiefer. This does not sound like an independant woman to me; instead more like someone looking for fame and fortune.
Except, 1:16, that we don't know that the part about the model is true (and, even if it is, we don't know any of the story behind it)... and we don't know the story behind the break-up of her marriage or how/why she and Kiefer got together.
The way you perceive it to have happened may be correct, but it also may not be. We just genuinely don't know for certain.
That's all I'm saying and I think that's all Pam is saying.
And to answer your question Pam, when I said substitute I wasn't refering to a person. I was meaning instead of saying 'm single and happy, he could have said he had a special person and wanted to keep it private. That would have answered my questions sufficiently, don't know about others. And why does anything matter that we say here. We are all speculating and have said so numerous times. Participation here is voluntary, so no one is being forced to give opinsions if they find the conversation unsavory in some way.
That is exactly what I am saying, and Lets just say that everything IS true, that she was living with someone when she met David and then she started dating Kiefer while still married. (lord knows Kifer never saw another woman while he was married, double standard?) but anyway lets say that it is true, Maybe just maybe Kiefer doesn't care, maybe he is just looking for Sex, affection, company, the guys has never been quiet about being lonely. And while 24 is on going, he can't commit, he has made that clear also. So anyway maybe he likes their relationship this way.
And Christy, I never said they didn't have affection for each other in some way. I have never subscribed to theory that they have always been just friends or that she might be working for him. That just doesn't fit, IMO. My main question comes into trying to believe they are a serious couple in love Too many things negate that possibility for me. A friend with benefits? Sure, quite possible.
That's cool, 1:30. :)
I don't know whether they're serious and/or in love either. Where we differ is that I don't believe that it's impossible that they are. But we don't have to agree on that (or anything... though, as it happens, it sounds like we do agree on some things), right?!
The reason I asked why it mattered is that some people, act like they know what is best for Kiefer, like he can't take care of himself. I know that everything is speculation, it has just turned so nasty(by some, not everyone). We don't have to protect him form her, I think he can take care of himelf in this area. and if he can't of well, he needs to learn. I just hate all the name calling and judging in re: to Sib, she may be a supreme witch, but she maybe the nicest, sweetest person in the world. And thanks for answering my question, and you know that while it may be enough for you to know that he was dating someone and keeping it private, it would drive some people. and probably me, cuase I am nosey by nature, but it would drive some to want to know who it was and that includes the press, cause if you tell them that, they just become more determined to find out who it is.
Pam
One more thing and then I really do need to get something constructive done today, LOL. I mean no disrespect to anyone here, but let's face it, posting here about all this is a bit nuts, and I include myself right in the thick of it all. I just think that if you come here to talk about this, you have to have the stomach to hear everything. This is a celebrity type gossip site where people from all walks of life come to give their opinions, and I feel everyone needs to take that into consideration. This isn't rocket science.
Christy I didn't attack you,no more than what you have done/said anyway to me and others, but I was just airing my feelings, as you do, and that's also fine:)
One thing I will say is that I heard that David liked young women and actually hung around bars picking them up.Although I can't remember where I saw that and of course it could be rumour.But he is French and its usually their custom to have mistresses or so I'm told?Or perhaps just more accepted than it is here I don't know.
1:59 I completely agree, oh and I have gotten something done constructive today, Yeah for me.. lol. that usually isn't the case but it is my New Years resolution. Which reminds me, Have a good NY every one
Pam
A happy, kiefery New Year to all of you. May there be peace among ALL Kiefer-fans, regardless of differing opinions.
I have been reading back on this site and came across Christy saying its "possible" Kiefer can be bi-sexual. If she can believe, he might be gay, how is it possible now that she can believe Kiefer is in a "possible" serious relationship with Siobhan. Did Kiefer stage all these photos with women to cover up perhaps the possibility he is gay?
Also I would like to add that someone on this site mention Christy should have her own fan site so, as I was looking at Kiefers fans sites last night Christy was in the chatbox under "Dillon" on the BBenny site and mentioned X17. Was that a deliberate add to get fans from Benny's site to come here for Christy's disagreements. I already know Hoppel and Ursula is from that site. Is she that unsure of herself that she has to gain support by "advertising" this site right in the chatbox. Usually they post links in the chatroom box not the sites itself. I told you she is a deceitful person. If you take notice Ursula is always in agreement with Christy it would seem she can't think for herself.
Ursula said I was nasty to Christy about her Alcoholic husband and I believed she should give him a hug. Well I now believe she is the Alcoholic and very "Addicted" to her computer that she has to hug it day and night. What does she know about relationships when the one she is in, is with her computer. She needs to get a LIFE. I feel sorry for her Addiction.
Happy New Year Everyone... Nicole
Nicole, Bi Sexual is just that BI meaning two, meaning you like both sexes. Given the meanding yes even if he was Bi Kiefer could be in a serious relationship with Kiefer, I don't know why that is hard to understand, What you said made no sense what so ever.
Pam
And by the way Christy being Dillon is old news, why don't you catch up. Have a great New Year. Sounds like you need one.
Very Well said 4.45!It was me who said she should get her own site as I think she would benefit greatly from it, although I doubt she will have much traffic through it..I'm still not convinced that Christy isn't Ursula or anyone else as she seems to use many different names which to me is very strange aqnd very deceitful especially since she felt compelled to state many peoples names on here from another site to look "good" in front of her friends it seems.I have also looked back at the posts here and I can't believe that she has interfered in this thread for 6 months constantly!And she even said she thought that they were gorgeous and made a great couple in June and then harped on about she thought he could be gay later??You figure coz I can't!lol
Happy New Year to you all!Louise
Hey Christy ... Sorry for the deelay in answering your question. Yes, I was referring to the blonde in the blue dress around the time of the Emmys? Was she the same woman who was topless in the water with Kiefer a few years back?
And I must say to Hoppel, I share your sentiment -- may the New Year bring peace to Kieferland. LOL
Hi ladies. Happy New Year to all!
Christy, I think I actually agree with you in part that the reason Kiefer and Siobhan rehearsed that little scene during the MV interview and also the reason we got the pictures of them at Denny's and San Diego (remember, this was billed as a romantic getaway; btw, who told them what was going on, hmmm, my guess is Kiefer or his people did) is because Kiefer wants it out there that he has a study girlfriend and one that is let's just say "acceptable" to the masses and I don't mean the fans. When you look at Siobhan and her resume she has similarities to Tricia. I agree with Christy that Tricia may have been part of a publicity trip as well. That is not to say that these women don't have feelings for Kiefer or the other way around. Quite the contrary, I think Tricia really did but because of her duities to motherhood she had to quit Kiefer cause of his heavy drinking at the time. I personally believe that Kiefer needs to show the powers that be those being all the major studios, the publicity machines and Hollywood itself. I don't think this really is about the fans at all. Frankly, while Kiefer is considerate as he can be to the fans, I truly don't think he cares squat about what we think about his relationships (to bad cause we may have made better choices for him, LOL)
to be continued
Just remember this publicity turnout started back in March to prepare us for the April 1st coming out when the Post owned by Fox (Kiefer's bosses) leaked the coupling. Then we got all the big shows followed by regular pictures and also regular leaks about how great Siobhan is for Kiefer then of course all the Malibu pics and that interview with the rehearsed scene and then the "romantic getaway". All designed I believe to keep reminding us that Kiefer has a reliable study girlfriend while not forcing Kiefer to even mention her. Think about it. He gets to put out there for all the Hollywood machine that he is study while not actually saying anything about it in interviews, etc. Cause once he opens his mouth about it he is lying. See, the pictures and skits allow the photogs and writers to forster the story while Kiefer does / says nothing....No one can call him a liar or say he is deceiptful but he accomplishes what he needs to accomplish. The reason to me is obvious. Once this jail and all were over and done with Kiefer needed to reassure all of the bosses in Hollywood that he could still be relied upon to get a job. I really think it's that simple as far as that part goes....
Sorry for the long posts but if it's believable that the Tricia affair was a fabrication given where Kiefer's life was at the time then why isn't it equally believable that the Siobhan affair isn't a total fabrication. I know Tricia was only on the map a short while but as I said, Tricia had motherly responsibilites which would have prevented her from staying around too long.
I am not saying that either of those affairs were fabricated or that there is no real love, etc. I can't know that for sure since I don't know these people. I am just putting out the observations....
Linda, you make quite a compelling argument. But, then, LOL, what do I know; heck, it didn't even occur to me that the MV interview interruption was planned by both of them, or that his relationship with Tricia could have been more PR than personal. Certainly loads of the pics of K & S have been "staged" -- even *I'm* not so naive to have missed that, but I didn't make the PR connection beyond obvious photo-ops.
P.S. for Linda (for people who don't believe in the - admittedly unexact - science of body language analysis, just "roll and scroll" .. as in, roll your eyes and scroll to the next post). Anyway Linda, Jen looked at the tape of Kiefer and Siobhan in the water (the point where he either jumps into the water or lurches away from her, as some have suggested). I asked Jen if he moved away on purpose and she said she didn't know, but she did know that, at the precise moment when Kiefer moved away, *Siobhan* felt rebuffed/rejected by him. Jen gave a long explanation as to why she drew her conclusion, but quite frankly I don't remember any of it. She also looked at the earliest pics of them in July 07 at the concert, standing on the street (Siobhan's wearing a navy blue dress). According to Jen, when Kiefer was talking to someone on the street and Siobhan was there, she wasn't being welcomed by Kiefer in that conversation. For example, normally when 3 people are in a discussion they form a triangle, but in this case it was Kiefer directly facing the other person. Siobhan, again, showed clear signs (to Jen) of feeling unwelcome. Jen stressed that it could have to do with the fact that Kiefer isn't (with a few notable exceptions)demonstrative in public, or maybe he was just being macho or something, but that was her observation about those (admittedly) frozen moments. At any rate, I know you're interested in Jen's thoughts and wanted to pass those ones along.
Nicole, as Pam said, "bisexual" doesn't mean "gay", it means that someone is attracted to both sexes. I don't know if Kiefer is bisexual (and I personally don't think it's even remotely a big deal if he is), but he's clearly not "gay", i.e., obviously, he mostly has had/continues to have interactions/relationships with women.
As for your 'theories' about me... I really do feel sad for you that you perceive the world as you do. That's the only thing I think when I read your posts.
Louise - I don't even understand your point about my posting here for six months. As has been established multiple times in this thread, this is a place for people who are interested in Kiefer to post. I'm interested in Kiefer. So are you. So are most of the other people posting here. It's an ongoing conversation. :)
Thanks for confirming about the blonde woman, Alexa. That's his friend Dave's wife and Dave was there too.
Hey, Linda - to me, the difference between Tricia and Siobhan vis a vis Kiefer is that Tricia (whom I do believe has been a friend of Kiefer's for some time, i.e., from before the time she appeared on the scene... so, for example, I think the cute scenes between Kiefer and her daughter were 'for real') clearly wasn't around at all prior to suddenly appearing in NYC and then at the Golden Globes. Kiefer verifiably was spending all of his time with Rocco-related stuff prior to her appearance. Plus, it was completely out of character for Kiefer to appear on camera to announce that he was bringing "a special friend" to the Golden Globes. For me (and I understand this may not be true for everyone), that absolutely shouted "this is PR!!!" Also, while I understand that this isn't an opinion shared by all either, I think that their body language was quite forced, i.e., I *do* think that they're acting (especially in the NYC and GG red carpet/after-party pics)... and I don't even think that Kiefer's giving as good of a performance as we know he's capable of giving!.
By contrast, one way or another, Siobhan has been around for a long time and, though I know that this differs with some others (not all others, though), I think their body language looks more "Kiefer-normal" in many ways than does the body language with Tricia.
Re: the "romantic getaway", whatever the nature of their trip to San Diego, I think that's pro-forma photo site language... kind of like "so&so is The One who's going to save so&so" and "so&so and so&so are engaged/no, they're not" is pro-forma entertainment magazine language.
Louise - meant to add in my earlier post... I *do* think they look really good together! So do others. And, of course, others don't. Those are just differences of opinion and I really and truly think that it's just fine - and then some - for everyone not to think the exact same things.
I mean, as we agreed on the other day, we can disagree agreeably, yes?!
Which is to say, I echo Hoppel and Alexa in wishing one and all - those with whom I agree, those with whom I don't, and those who are reading and giggling at how silly we ALL are ;) :D - a very very happy and peaceful 2009!
Oops, I left out 'Kiefery'!
*rewinds*
I wish one and all a very very happy and peaceful *and Kiefery* 2009!!! :D
Thank you Alexa for that info on the body language thing; I would love to hear more. With regard to how Kiefer and Siobhan look together, I very much disagree Christy. He rarely looks engaged with her, imo. The only time you seem to see a reaction from him is if they are looking at something or someone else. I understand not everybody is demonstrative physically, but these two just seem like they are on auto-pilot to me.
OMG Linda what you sayed about Kiefer @ 6:39 & @ 6:47AM is what I was thinking especially the part about Kiefer not doing any of the lying in interviews. He always skated around the issue about his relationship with Siobhan.
I never had a dislike for Siobhan as some do but with me it was just Kiefer repeating the same pattern like he has with his other women.
I can't believe with Tricia it was PR stuff. I liked him and Tricia together at the awards they looked so cute and Kiefer looked so happy. I would never in my wildest dreams believe it was staged. I'm sorry but I don't buy into that one! Whats so wrong with Kiefer just taking a date or friend to the awards? Why so much PR stuff with that? I don't get it!
Of course later in their relationship I felt it wasn't going to work because of Kiefer liking to party/drink. She wasn't changing that part of his life either. I felt she wouldn't stay in that relationship because of her responsibles with a daughter. At first I thought Kiefer was really going to change with her but of course we all know it didn't happen. Kiefer can perhaps pretend but not Tricia. How could Kiefer even think about pretending when there was a little girl involved. Sorry, I don't believe for a minute Kiefer would go that far involving a child or a mother with PR stuff. That's not Kiefer!
It was a new relationship Kiefer was trying out and I believe at first he wanted it to work but knew it wouldn't so he or she backed out of it for her daughter sake. Kiefer would never involve a child in his messy life. No way was that PR related. If you can believe it was then you must have a very LOW opinion of Kiefer.
continue...He has a daughter do you believe he couldn't relate to Tricia not wanting a messy relationship with someone that loves to party and is not willing to change because of it. I heard she was in one before. Like I said Kiefer is not that LOW to do PR stuff with her.
If he cared so much for Siobhan he would change for her. Just not happening as of yet and doesn't look like its going to. The only thing that I can say about their relationship is she either doesn't care because she likes to party also or she thinks she can change him. Good Luck with that because it hasn't happen yet even after he has done time in jail.
I do wonder what her friends and family think of this messy relationship if there is one of course.
Happy New Year...Kalin
PS...One more thing I would like to add. If you feel Kiefer can LOWER himself and do PR related things with a woman who has a daughter, how LOW do you think Siobhan is, to follow along with all this PR related stuff with Kiefer and I do agree that alot of THEIR sightings is PR related.
I don't think Christy or anyone else here is claiming Kiefer acted badly with regard to Tricia. If it was all PR (and I have no idea if it was or wasn't), then I'm sure they both agreed upon it. My thoughts are that if you think that pairing was all PR, than how can you say the one with Siobhan isn't? My personal view is that it started out normally and he might have thought it had a future in it, but by the time of the Griffith Park pics, I think Kiefer was already out of the zone, so to say. Since then nothing about their relationship has even resembled two people who care deeply for one another. It's all about convenience now I think.
From everything I have read here and all the PR related stuff going on in Kiefer life it sounds like he is trying to coverup the possibility he is gay.
Kiefer said that he can't commit himself to a relationship because of 24 but I think its a excuse. He worked 24 plus committed himself to promoting Rocco's career. He was with Rocco day and night even traveled all over the world to be at his concerts but yet he claims he can't commit to a relationship with a woman. He was committed to Rocco for 4 yrs. He never promoted anyone else or spent that much time with any other group. They went on many trips by themselves. The only woman he took to the events at that time was Tricia I don't recall any other women involved with him then, just rumors about some. This is my take if he is gay.
Go back and read everything for yourself ""especially about him not lying about a relationship when he does interviews like Linda said"". Pretend he is gay when you are reading. Don't know what to believe anymore with all this PR related stuff over the women he has been with, doesn't work for me. Either all of you are screwing things up with this Pr stuff or its a coverup.
Someone said she makes a good income and her family is wealthy but they can't come close to want Kiefers wealth is. So get real! Their income is a piss in the bucket compared to his.
I think he really like Tricia nd she him but he was working alot and maybe just didn't feel ready to commit to a woman with a little girl.I think Tricia seemd natural and down to earth altho seemed quite shy too and over awed aittle at the awards.Agree with the above about Sibs wealth too.
I can agree with all this PR related stuff it is beginning to look like Kiefer is trying to cover-up something.
The PR stuff with Trica unreal. What are you saying that Kiefer needs permission to date someone for a event?
1. What the interviewer wrote about her being a influence in Kiefers life in the MV mag was on the internet way before the magazine came out with it. Someone else wrote almost the same thing and that was when Kiefer said, "I'm single and having fun". Single meaning not commited to anyone.
2. Kiefer was wearing his ring on his left hand as a married person would but someone informed him it was a no no and we seen him switch the ring to his other hand "real fast".
3. Without him taking her to the Walk of Fame also "proved" he wasn't committed to her in a "serious relationship".
4. Seeing pics of him out drinking was another sign he was "single and having fun" with friends.
Kiefer showed his fans 4 times that he wasn't in a committed or serious relationship. Probably just dating her and other women too, like the woman at The Paley event standing at the wall, the girl in scrubs, the Gordon woman etc:. What more do you want from him a hand written letter?
His is not committed to her or anyone.
Personally I don't buy into the gay thing.Kiefer is his own person and I'm sure if he was gay he would have just come out,I mean whats the big deal?I think that he wants the approval of men,possibly as his Dad wasn't around when he was a kid, but it doesn't mean he is gay.It seems to me that Kiefer throws himself in head first with relationships and then gets cold feet.He has said he is a perfectionist perhaps he is looking for the "perfect" woman and goes into relationships thinking that it's going to be special but then he loses interest because the women turn out to be not right for him.Just a few ideas anyway.Louise
I've just read back over some previous posts and I had wondered if that woman on the sidewalk was Siobhan(with the navy dress).Is it the Boston Rocco Concert or am I thinking of another photo?Siobhan was still married then though as the previous month she was in that NY mag talking about her antiques and large house etc then she is seen with Kiefer a month later?This tells me that perhaps it was a working relationship or friendship in the beginning and then progressed into more later but it seems to have died a death again.So confusing!Apart from that one pic of them both holding hands in NY we have not seen any other form of affection have we?I was trying to think thats all.If we had I would maybe be more willing to accept some of the relationship theories.Louise
I think you are right Louise about the Pic of them at the concert in July 07 with her in the blue dress. There was also a pic of them inside the concert. They weren't sitting together inside. Someone said, I think Alexa an analysis reading body language said outside the concert when he was talking to one of the bands members that she wasn't being welcomed by Kiefer in the conversation. She also said at the beach Siobhan was trying to touch Kiefer in a video and Kiefer turned away from her. A woman a few houses down also said she was looking for affection from them and she didn't see any. Someone tried to make excuses for Kiefer and said he doesn't like a public display of affection but we seen plenty of pics where Kiefer does show alot of affection to other women. Some women can real cling.
What kind of working relationship would you suppose it was between them because Kiefer never confirmed that they were in a relationship that I know of. Holding hands one time doesn't say much to me. I have a guy friend, just a friend, we went to the hospital to visit someone we knew and we walked in hand and hand, sometimes I even hold on to a guy friends arm when we are out together so I don't understand this relationship,if it is one. In my opinion Kiefer knows he has issues with relationships & partying why so serious right after a divorce and many other failed relationships. This one looks like it failed too. If he was going to get serious in a relationship I would think he would stop drinking/partying. He is just dating and having fun in my opinion.What do you think Louise? Kalin
Hi Kalin,I have to agree with your post esp the holding hands part.Although something tells me that "something" has happened between them at some time or other I don't think much is going on now.In April for that entire month we saw them every weekend,it felt surreal to me,as we have never seen him like that(and as Linda or Christy said I think too)we have never,ever seen this many pics of him with a woman over a short period of time inc.wives.I feel that he could've be tried to have a relationship here but we can tell how strained his body language was.In my opinion,he doesn't want to lead her on.How many of us know men who have seen women socially but without commitment?I know loads.Basically I just feel he is not that into her.How do we know how the jail time has affected him?Could it be he just doesn't know what he wants?
Louise
Also Kalin-As far as their relationship goes I think it's possible that she does freelance stylist work and has worked on his music videos.Maybe they have kept things just casual between them?I still can't forget the Griffith Pk pics, wish an expert would tell us about them as that is when I felt something had gone wrong.Whilst I take on board what others have said about Kiefer needing his fans etc and having to use PR and we all know no-one is perfect,but how do we know that Sib hasn't suggested to him about having photographers there(waverly &pastis)and he has agreed to it?Let's be honest men can be stupid when it comes to women and certain women can be extremely manipulative.I have listened to what others have said but the work Sib does and her history just make it really hard for me to trust her.And what I find intersting is that Kiefer even seems to be keeping her at arms length which should tell us all something?It seems alot of us here are in agreement that you can tell alot about body language from pics after reading Alexa's interesting post so I don't feel I'm unjustified in my assumptions of this woman.Louise
Hi ladies and I hope everyone had a wonderful new years.
Alexa, thank you so much for posting that information. I do find what Jen does as interesting and what an interesting study Kiefer must be, LOL. I certainly get what she says about the Rocco concert where Kiefer and Dave are having a discussion; Siobhan seems to be just there!!
Btw, there are a few pictures that surfaced from that night. It was the Rocco Concert at the Bowery in NYC on July 31st. I think that is where Kiefer first hooked up at least where he was seen with Siobhan. And yes, there was a NY Times article only a month earlier which you can get online showing Siobhan and her husband and their new dream house. It's all entered in to my suspicions about her and her motives.....
Just one thing about the PR thing at least from my perspective is that I don't believe it makes Kiefer a deceitful or bad person. I really believe he feels his livelihood depends on certain things and that he would go along with stuff if that meant making it look better for the studio bosses. I don't know that the Tricia thing or Siobhan thing are all PR related or partly PR related, I just see aspects of it in both. I liked Tricia and wish the Tricia thing would have worked for Kiefer. She seemed like a real person at least in my view.......this current one does not, IMHO!!
As far as I remember, magazines wrote that Tricia broke with Kiefer because of his heavy drinking. She said something like: "I have to think of my daughter."
Talking about a pattern with Kiefer what about the fact Kelly was in a relationship, it fell apart and Kiefer was there to pick up the pieces.
The same with Tricia breaking up with her rocker boyfriend and there was Kiefer.
Siobhan breaks up with her husband(whatever) and Kiefer was there again.
Not sure with Catherine. Is that a pattern for you? hmmmm
Its possible in my opinion Kiefer is gay not bisexual and he used these women for his PR coverup stuff. Its the reason why his relationships with women are strange to say the least. I believe he had something going on with Rocco. Kiefer would hide this fact because women can handle other people being gay but macho men can't so 24 would get targeted very badly with a macho Jack Bauer. Kiefers acting career would be over. There were lots of rumors going around before Kiefer went to jail. With Siobhan I see PR written all over it. No affection in public...well go to KieferRocks web site and you will see lots of pics of him kissing guys.
I think a lot of you women who are in love with Kiefer you just do not want to see it.
I like Kiefer in 24 and I happen to love gay guys. 3 of my best friends are gay. Gay men love talking to women because they can't relate to macho men. 1 is my Realtor, 1 is a Designer and the other owns a Garden Center and they are very good looking. I need to get them together for this debate they will know.
got cut off..1 guy is my Realtor, 1 in a Designer and the other owns a Garden Center. They are very good looking. This will be a great debate for me to ask them about and they will know.
Oh btw I liked what Linda said too about Kiefer not putting himself out there to lie at interviews about his relationship about Siobhan. Don't want to get caught lying to the press, now does he? Big reason why he wants to keep his personal life private.
5:33, you make very good arguments in my opionion.
Interesting that you brought up Kelly too. Seems to me that he saw Kelly as someone in need as she was alone having to raise two boys but basically as soon as they were married it seemed to become a sham. Doesn't mean Kiefer didn't love her in some form but he really didn't live with her as her husband too much if at all. I mean he tried to get back with her by them having two separate homes? Who does that?.....and yes Kiefer does really keep his private life private. Notice how he now seems to have gone underground yet we got all those pictures of him and Siobhan including the ones only a few days after the walk of fame. Don't you think people asked him why Siobhan wasn't there? What did he tell his dad and co-workers, etc. that they have an agreement; sorry I am not buying that. I bet he told them all that she was busy with work and then lo and behold he shows up on a romantic getaway with her and he has the photogs there at the ready to document it...I am not judging him I just want him to be able to be who is whatever that is and be happy about it. The shams are what bother me if that is what is going on, just saying...
Yes Linda was right. Kiefer *never ever* announce to anyone that she was his girlfriend. The press and everyone else assummed she was because of photos.
The so called romantic getaway could have been business and we don't know if they actually shared a room. Rocco and Kiefer shared a Suite in Japan together.
It's possible Kiefer let her share his apartment until she found one of her own after her split with ex. Doesn't mean they shared a bed there either. Kiefer was there only on the weekends. I'm sure it has more then one bedroom.
Rocco was invited to the Walk of Fame.
Where was she at? The event was planned way in advance but she couldn't take one day off from work. Oh thats right or was it PR stuff and they didn't want anyone to see them together there after we got a shit load of photos. Or maybe Kiefer didn't want the press to ask questions but isn't that the reason for his PR's being there. OMG how silly.
With all this PR stuff, something is being covered up and its not a girlfriend. I can see how silly that can be. Kiefer is a small screen star not a Brad Pitt. Gee even Brad didn't care who seen him with women and they were "big star names" he dated and married. Someone is leading everyone down the wrong altar...
Yes Linda was right. Kiefer *never ever* announce to anyone that she was his girlfriend. The press and everyone else assummed she was because of photos.
The so called romantic getaway could have been business and we don't know if they actually shared a room. Rocco and Kiefer shared a Suite in Japan together.
It's possible Kiefer let her share his apartment until she found one of her own after her split with ex. Doesn't mean they shared a bed there either. Kiefer was there only on the weekends. I'm sure it has more then one bedroom.
Rocco was invited to the Walk of Fame.
Where was she at? The event was planned way in advance but she couldn't take one day off from work. Oh thats right or was it PR stuff and they didn't want anyone to see them together there after we got a shit load of photos. Or maybe Kiefer didn't want the press to ask questions but isn't that the reason for his PR's being there. OMG how silly.
With all this PR stuff, something is being covered up and its not a girlfriend. I can see how silly that can be. Kiefer is a small screen star not a Brad Pitt. Gee even Brad didn't care who seen him with women and they were "big star names" he dated and married. Someone is leading everyone down the wrong altar...
Yes Linda was right Kiefer "never ever" announced to the press that he was in a relationship with Siobhan. Everyone just assumed it, with all the photos.
The romantic getaway could have been business. We don't know if they shared a room together. Rocco and Kiefer shared a Suite in Japan.
She might have stayed at Kiefer's Apartment in NY after her split with ex until she found one of her own. Just a friend helping another friend out. Kiefer was there only on weekends. I'm sure his apartment had more then one bedroom.
Rocco was invited to the Walk of Fame but happen to her! These events are planned in advance and she couldn't take a day off? Silly! Oh I forgot his PR's didn't think it was a good idea because of the press being there. Isn't it their job to take care of that? Silly! Or they didn't want Kiefer and her being seen together that day after we got a shit load of pics of them.
All this PR's stuff is covering up something and it's not a girlfriend. Kiefer is a small screen star not a big star like Brad Pitt. Did Brad care who knew about his relationships with women and these women had "BIG names" that he dated and married. Someone is leading everyone down the wrong altar here...
This does explain alot to me with Kiefer and Rocco. I remember the stuff that went on back then with them.
What stuff went on with them?Are we all so cynical that there has to be more to it than Kiefer simply wanted to just do his best for Rocco & the band?It was IW first signing,rocco said himself they get on well because they have a similar past.Rocco has girlf and child.Just my opinion but just because he hasn't been seen with the "wonderful" Siob is abit far fetched to assume he is gay!He has said he is single and have you seen how many women he has had?I'm sticking with he hasn't found the right woman until I hear otherwise and someone can prove something concrete.
I agree as I did before about Linda's comment. It got me thinking back to Rocco and Kiefer and all this PR related stuff but never thought about Kiefer and Rocco as a gay couple.
I will need to take sometime and look at this possibility. All this PR stuff especially with Tricia is a little unreal to me.
Stars in my opinion only need this type of PR stuff if they are covering up something bad that happen or like some people are saying being gay. Its not bad but I would believe it would be very bad for the show.
No one ever mention the pattern or connection with the 3 women on their relationships falling apart and strange Kiefer was there to pick them up. Maybe it was pretty great of him too, who knows. Gays can be very touching emotional people.
Kalin
Hi 5.33-Bit confused by your post and not sure where you are going with it.Do you mean that he is attracted to vulnerable women or he breaks up relationships?You might have more info than me but I have no idea about the time between Tricias last realtionship and whne hse got with KLiefer.She was rumoured to have been with a gut from The red hot chillis but we dont know when that was do we?And Kelly?She had two young kids but we don't know how long she was single for before then and IF he was gay and wanted to hide it then wouldn't he have just spent his time single?I'm not even getting started on this Siobhan farce.
It wouldn't make him the nicest guy in the world if he had knowingly entered these marriages/relationships knowing he was gay.Plus I don't think it can be great for Sarah to hear taht fans think her Dad could be gay either without no proof.JMHO
I have serious keypad problems today so please excuse my above post.Hope it makes sense.Louise
Howdy People-
We wouldn't even be suggesting that Kiefer is or is not gay if he hadn't carried out this silly behaviour with S.B. for all these many month's.
Anyone else agree he really should just sort all of this crap out?!
Lifehouse was their first signing by Jude Cole and Rocco by both of them. What was strange Louise was they were together in Japan and the same Suite. They traveled everywhere together. By promoting Rocco it was a cover up because when he got back he stop being Roccos manager but continued to travel all over the world with him and sometimes alone. Rocco and Kiefer had small things in common but Kiefer was far above Rocco past. Kiefer wasn't in a relationship with any women but Tricia for a very short time. No one else Louise...the rest were rumors for 4 years and maybe still going on. We know they are still together but it is very lowkey since Siobhan been on the scene. It can work both ways Louise. Do you have to be so cynical about Siobhan and Kiefers relationship. Even you believe something is wrong there.
His relationship with John English was in question too. Who goes off to play rodeo for 2 years and leaves a wife and 2 kids behind in a new marriage.
Can't prove it but neither can you prove his relationships with women haven't been a coverup. His not with them long enough and has never lived with any. If so, just for a very short period. His relationships are long distance even with Kelly who lived in Canada after they split up in 1999. Very short lived marriage that took 12 yrs to resolve. None of us know who Kiefer really is.
11:06 - I don't agree that he's obligated to sort anything out for a few handfuls of people... or, for that matter, that he'd be obligated to sort anything out if millions of people were interested. imo, his personal life is his personal life and he has every right in the world to make it as public/not public as he wants to make it.
Re: the question of Kiefer's sexuality in general and Rocco specifically, I've always thought that it's entire possible that Kiefer is bisexual, i.e., neither fully heterosexual or fully homosexual... but someone who can be attracted to both men and women. I don't think that means that his relationships with women are "fake." It seems pretty clear to me that he's attracted to women... and, very possibly, men too.
I do think that, whether it was platonic or physical (or some of both), he seemed pretty devoted to Rocco. imo, it was the amount of time that he was spending with Rocco - and the nature of that time (e.g., a sighting of him having a 'romantic' dinner with a young man with black nail polish... gee, wonder who that was? ;)) that prompted the appearance of Tricia (someone who *was* - and I'm sure is - a friend).
While I don't care who Kiefer does or doesn't sleep with and I know that many others don't either, "leading man" is about the last frontier in Hollywood in terms of it still not being "okay" to be anything other than fully heterosexual. That barrier will be broken eventually, but it hasn't been yet.
11:21 - I agree with you that none of us really know the real-deal story of any of this... but just wanted to ask...
Have you ever heard/seen anything specific to make you think there's anything non-just-friendship/roping-partnership between Kiefer and John English?
I mean, with Rocco, we have lots of information (whether we're interpreting it correctly or not), but I've never heard/read/seen anything about Kiefer's time with John English other than that they were roping partners, who would travel together by definition.
Louise I never said Kiefer broke up anyones relationships or marriages. He was just there when it happen. Kelly was never married to the man who fathered her 2 boys and neither was Tricia. Both Kelly's and Tricia's ex's were worst then Kiefer with partying, drinking and women, he was like a dream to them. Kiefer lives in the Rock world, (this is how he met Kelly, Tricia and his 1st wife), more so then the Hollywood world he knows whats happening. Who knows if Siobhan ex lives in the Rock (music) world and this is how Kiefer met her.
Kiefer met his first wife while making The Killing Time, not "through the rock world."
The father of Kelly's boys was producer John Daly, not a "rock world" guy. I don't think we have any information about him being "worse than Kiefer" at "partying, drinking and women." He may've been, but where did you read that?
For that matter, while we know that Chad Smith (the father of Tricia's daughter) has a partying past, I'm not sure where you get the information to say that he was "worse than" Kiefer or to make the declarative statement "he (Kiefer) was like a dream to them."
Kelly's boys weren't toddlers when she and Kiefer got together and neither was Tricia's daughter. So far as I know, we have no information about when those relationships broke up relative to when Kiefer came on the scene. Once you get to a certain age, most people who get involved in relationships have been involved in relationships before. ;)
We also have no information about what happened to Siobhan and her ex-husband's marriage. It's all just speculation.
Anonymous,I wasn't accusing you of anything I just didn't understand your post that's all which is why I asked you to explain so thanks for answering.Just furthering from what Christy asked about John English,in comparison have any of you seen any evidence that Rocco is gay?As I thought he had a girlf and child.Kiefer was with Catherine for four years on and off and they lived together for a year.I hear what you are saying and it could be possible I'm just not sure we have seen any evidence.The hotel room thing-He was in Japan to do 24,maybe he took Rocco along as an after thought last minute and the hotel was booked up.I just think it could be innocent thats all.And do we know for sure they shared a room??When he did the rodeo I thought it was before Kelly?I know that he and Kelly had a ranch at sometime too.Rocco was the first band that was signed by IW label completely.IW did not sign up with any other label to promote them.If you have seen ITYTKM you will hear him say they are the first band etc.Just to add to John English,Kiefer never went to college he enjoyed doing the whole buddy thing.I have loads of girls as friends,when we go away we share a room often(separate beds of course)I just don't think we should go off the dee end thats all.:)
We seem desperate to categorise him(either with sib/single/or gay.I don't know who is right and as someone said we may never know.:)
Christy I 100% agree with your post.That is exactly what I was thinking too.
No I think she is right. Kiefer met his 1st wife by Jude Cole. Later they met again on the set of "The Killing Time" or was it Kiefer met Jude Cole at his wedding by his 1st wife. It doesn't make to much different because Jude Cole was involved with them both a Rocker himself.
Also I read a article that John Daly got his start in the music world and later became a producer. It said he lived like a Rock Star and loved it, very heavy drinker, drugs, partied, went out with thousands of women who followed the band around. He also has so many kids he couldn't remember which mother was who. The article was bad.
Its also known Chad Smith was a party person too and was pick up for drugs. I guess I would say Kiefer was a dream compared to the others especially Kelly's ex. I believe Kiefer met Kelly at a Rod Stewart party.
I do know Kiefer was with Kelly when he went with John English to rodeo back in 1997 or 98. The info is out there.
She is right again...Whatever the info is he met these women in the Rock World and Siobhan was at Roccos concert maybe where they met.
We will never know if Kiefer is gay or about his relationships with women but the speculate has always been out there with Kiefer in Gay bars and what have you. I really don't know anything else.
Kiefer met Jude at his wedding to Camelia, whom he met while making The Killing Time. Camelia's late husband was Terry Kath, from the band, Chicago. So, yes, she was involved with the "rock world"... and, yes, Jude was/is in the music business. But neither of those facts changes the additional facts that Kiefer and Camelia met making a movie and that Kiefer met Jude through Camelia.
Can you point me in the direction of that article about John Daly? He may have gotten his start in the music business and he may have been a hard partier. That just sounds like a tabloid article and I'd like to judge its likely accuracy for myself.
Yes, Chad Smith had (maybe has; I don't know) a drug problem. Yes, Kiefer met Kelly at Rod Stewart's birthday party. Yes, Kiefer was married to Kelly when he went out on the rodeo circuit the second time.
None of that speaks to Kiefer's relationship with John English *or* to whether or not any of the women that Kiefer has been with consider him to be a "dream" compared to other men they've been with. That may be your take; but we don't know what they think. I think that Kiefer, for all his lovely qualities, is probably pretty darned far from a "dream" to be in a relationship with. :)
Ok, that's WEIRD! My post that's timestamped 1:46pm (which is the time it was posted here on the west coast of the U.S.) is in response to Anonymous' post at 2:18pm (which, clearly, can't be the right west coast time for that post since I was responding to it with my 1:46pm post! ;)).
Not sure why/how my 1:46pm post ended up posting before the 2:18pm post, but just wanted to let y'all know that it's in response to the 2:18pm post. :)
Very odd. Both my 1:46pm and 1:50pm (west coast of the U.S. time) posts posted above Anonymous' 2:18pm (don't know what timezone) post.
So, am just trying a post at a time after that 2:18pm timestamp to see if it posts at the end of the thread or not.
There's never been any distinction made by timezone on this site before, but things change here from time to time (for example, when signatures started posting at the top of the post instead of the bottom a week or so ago) so anything's possible. *If* that's the case, though, it's going to get very confusing 'round here! :)
You see Louise Christy feels Kiefer is bi-sexual because she sees Kiefer with other women but of course the reason you see him with them is to cover the fact he is gay.Go back and look at the pics of Kiefer with all his women. Look at the one with Kiefer and Catherine together. Kiefer has his hands in his pockets while Catherine is doing the deed of kissing him. You will find alot of pics with the women touching him by he real doesn't touch them. Go look at the pics of him with men and there is a big differents.
After Rocco and Kiefer came back from the tour with the band in 05 in 06 Kiefer took Tricia to the Golden Globes event. Rocco got upset with Kiefer for using her so Kiefer promised Rocco he would never do his usual PR stuff again with women. As you can see Kiefer has never since that time has taken any women to any events with him again. Go check! This is why I know Kiefer and him are still together. The other PR stuff Rocco will go along with as long as Kiefer stays honest about it. What Linda said, Kiefer never ever informed anyone that he was in a relationship about her out loud not even to the press. He hasn't lied to anyone but Linda said it alot better then I. Read her comment again. Yes this is speculation but so is Christy speculating about a "serious" relationship he is having with Siobhan. She doesn't know Kiefer and neither do I to know any of Kiefers business and it is his business. So I'm glad Christy "can admit" that she "speculates" just like I'm doing about Kiefers life.
You see Louise Christy feels Kiefer is bi-sexual because she sees Kiefer with other women but of course the reason you see him with them is to cover the fact he is gay.Go back and look at the pics of Kiefer with all his women. Look at the one with Kiefer and Catherine together. Kiefer has his hands in his pockets while Catherine is doing the deed of kissing him. You will find alot of pics with the women touching him by he real doesn't touch them. Go look at the pics of him with men and there is a big differents.
After Rocco and Kiefer came back from the tour with the band in 05 in 06 Kiefer took Tricia to the Golden Globes event. Rocco got upset with Kiefer for using her so Kiefer promised Rocco he would never do his usual PR stuff again with women. As you can see Kiefer has never since that time has taken any women to any events with him again. Go check! This is why I know Kiefer and him are still together. The other PR stuff Rocco will go along with as long as Kiefer stays honest about it. What Linda said, Kiefer never ever informed anyone that he was in a relationship about her out loud not even to the press. He hasn't lied to anyone but Linda said it alot better then I. Read her comment again. Yes this is speculation but so is Christy speculating about a "serious" relationship he is having with Siobhan. She doesn't know Kiefer and neither do I to know any of Kiefers business and it is his business. So I'm glad Christy "can admit" that she "speculates" just like I'm doing about Kiefers life.
Sorry the site isn't working right because I only clicked once....weird
A couple of things, 3:18pm...
1) Kiefer took Catherine to the Emmy's after he took Tricia to the Golden Globes. I happen to think that was mostly a PR thing too, but it's not accurate to say that he hasn't done "PR stuff with women" since he took Tricia to the Golden Globes. Plus, regardless of them not doing Kiefer's red carpet events together, Kiefer's certainly been willingly photographed with Siobhan. The fact is that, prior to taking Tricia to the GG's and Catherine to the Emmy's in 2006, Kiefer hadn't taken a date to a red carpet event since he was with Kelly, i.e., since before he'd even met Rocco. I actually do think that both of those 'dates' may've been related to the public intensity of his relationship with Rocco (whatever the actual nature of their relationship), but Kiefer's not taking women on red carpets is a behavior that predated Rocco.
2) Yep, we're all speculating. I think there's agreement about that here. But, to be clear, what I've said (repeatedly) is that I don't know what the nature of Kiefer & Siobhan's relationship to one another is. That is, I believe that it could be a serious relationship... or (and this is the key piece that for whatever reasons people sometimes miss) not. :)
3.18-I have said that we may never know and yes we are all just speculating I can "admit" that.I'm only speculating that I don't think he is gay.I'm not apologising for thinking that but if you show me some evidence or perhaps you know them persoanlly then I will listen to what you have to say.
Have you seen the pics of him with that girl at the golf course??They were all over eachother.What confuses me is that its been kiefer/sib for weeks,we dont see them for ages and then all of a sudden he is gay!Like some people need constant drama to discuss in his life.Seems odd dontcha think. You still cannot show me evidence that Rocco is gay though can you?You are skirting over the subject that he has a girlf and child.
To be honest Christy in relation to what you just said at the end there,I think sometimes,as with text messages,posts can come across wrongly which is why I think there is sometimes a communication problem and arguments start over nothing.
One thing I will say is I'm getting sick of answering cowardly anonymous posts.
I agree, Louise, that things get lost in the translation in writing. Definitely! And that answers the question you've asked me before about why it's been so important to me to restate my thoughts in hopes of them being understood. i.e., they weren't being understood! :D
re: being tired of anonymous posts, welcome to my world. ;) I truly can't, for the life of me, understand not posting a name with a post. I mean, we all have a right to our thoughts and opinions (and a right to agree or disagree with others' thoughts and opinions) but, ferhevinsakes, why not OWN one's own thoughts and opinions... right? :)
I don't know what 3:18 thinks about this but, IF there was anything except a very very close friendship between Rocco and Kiefer, imo, Rocco would fall into the same category that I think Kiefer may fall into... i.e., bisexual... either in general or just in that situation. But who knows. Even if there wasn't anything beyond friendship between them, I do think there was enough publicity about the intensity of their friendship to potentially warrant Kiefer's PR folks wanting him to be seen with dates at red carpet events. That's the kind of thing that's gone in Hollywood since Hollywood began.
Also anonymous as you keep mentioning christy I'm presuming you are one of her mates from BB and have attitude with me over the disagreements last week.Some of which I had nothing to do with btw.And Christy and I have made our peace,or at least I hope so.
Never mind telling me to go "Go Check" Do you really really believe that Rocco got upset with Kiefer and so he promised not to use women again??I'm sorry, yes we are all speculating, but I would put a million quid on the fact that aint true.I accept we are all speculating but some things are just starting to take things off the deep end here now.And Kiefers business is kiefers business?Why are you commenting then?We have all admitted we are interested in him because he is fascinating and people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
You see Christy when you put it like that I can understand it and I have to agree with what you said there.(I'm getting worried about how in agreement Iam with you today lol)
But seriously please put a name, I feel like I'm talking to nobody its too strange.
Just for the record, I don't have any idea who this Anonymous is, but I don't think it's a mate of mine. I don't recognize the writing style and, in any case, other than agreeing that it's possible that Kiefer is bisexual (whether or not he had anything other than a friendship with Rocco) and that it's possible that his red carpet dates with Tricia and Catherine had something to do with the intensity of his public friendship with Rocco (whether or not there was any more to it than that), I don't agree with her (I guess it's a her; don't even know that) posts.
For example, I completely agree with you, Louise, that the idea that Rocco got angry when Kiefer took Tricia to the GG's is absurd speculation... and would bet a big sum of money against that too! :)
Hee, Louise! We're definitely on an agreeing roll today! :D
LOL Christy,Don't tell anyone! It must be a new year or something he he!
And OK I appreciate that, I just wondered thats all after the chaos of last week.The fact is none of us knows anything for sure but we can speculate all the same.I think we feel we have to repeat ourselves at times because of the communication problems of posting,especially when we are all from different countries.
Just a quick thing on Kiefer taking dates to the awards. I thought he took Catherine to the Emmys in 2005 and then Tricia to the Golden Globes in 2006...
You're right, Anna! My bad. :)
But, prior to those two consecutive awards shows - the Emmys in 2005 and the GGs in 2006 -, Kiefer hadn't taken a date (other than Sarah or Maurice or Michael or Suzan, i.e. not really "dates") to an awards show/red carpet event since Kelly... and he hasn't since.
You're right, Anna! My bad. :)
But, prior to those two consecutive awards shows - the Emmys in 2005 and the GGs in 2006 -, Kiefer hadn't taken a date (other than Sarah or Maurice or Michael or Suzan, i.e. not really "dates") to an awards show/red carpet event since Kelly... and he hasn't since.
Thank you Anna for your correction on the dates for Christy and Louise. You can call me aKa but what is the differents I heard Christy uses anonymous names herself. The site does say optional!!
He and Kelly were over for a long time so it wasn't because of her he stopped taking women to the events. Like I said it was after Tricia.
The golf girl is easy Louise...Kiefer seen someone taking photos of him and he asked the girl to play along with him. His a actor and he was acting just like he is with Siobhan.
You all seen how much time Kiefer put into Rocco as I said, I hope I don't have to repeat myself and don't forget it takes big money to promote someone. It has been 4 years of Kiefers time that he has never devoted to a woman. If you can devote his time to Rocco like he did why not to a woman?
Kiefer is only doing what his bosses are asking him to do with this PR stuff and Kiefer as you see and as everyone has discuss is just making Kiefer look good after his jail time.
Yes Christy I sure do remember every thing you have said, you let NO one forget it because it is always a repeat. You had this info about Kiefer and Rocco but I didn't see you put it out there for the fans to see. You can speculate and give your opinion about Siobhan and believe that they are a serious couple so I feel free to speculate and give my opinion on Kiefer and Rocco. The same with you Louise.
aKa
This site is open to the public so I hope it wasn't a problem to put something out there for everyone to look into instead of standing still with repeated info. You want Kiefer to be who you want him to be. I told you Louise check out your info before you get upset over someones elses opinion. The dates were wrong Louise about Tricia and the events. Kiefer stopped because of Rocco not Kelly. How silly. Go and check out the body language that Kiefer has between a man and a woman.
I said Kiefer met these women because he lives in the Rock World not the Hollywood World. The info about Kiefer and the rumors of him being gay are out there but with the info I have on John English and Kiefer it slowly started to disappear. Isn't that strange I wonder who did that but I have it. I been researching Kiefers gay past for 5 years now. Of course to please everyone I will call it speculation and just my opinion. I wouldn't want to mess up anyones sweet dreams of Kiefer.
One more thing before I go. I like Kiefer alot because he is "finally" trying to be true and honest with someone and its not Siobhan. aKa
aKa, I don't "use anonymous names" (which doesn't make sense anyway)... so you're wrong about that.
Also, no one said that Kiefer stopped taking dates to red carpet events because of Kelly. I simply said that, until he took Catherine and Tricia to two consecutive red carpet events, but hadn't taken anyone to a red carpet event since Kelly and hasn't taken anyone to one since he took Tricia to the GG's. I agree with you that those two red carpet 'dates' may've been related to Kiefer's intense and public friendship with Rocco. I even think it's possible that there was more than friendship between him and Rocco... though I don't know that to be a fact... and I'm 99.999% sure that you don't know that to be a fact either.
I just disagree that Kiefer stopped taking women to red carpet events after Tricia because Rocco got mad. That's your speculation and you have a right to it, of course... just as I have a right to think it's silly.
If you have information about Kiefer and John English, beyond what's publicly known that is, please share it. Otherwise, I only can conclude that you don't have it. For the record, it wouldn't bother me even a teeny bit if Kiefer were 100% certified gay.
... also, you seem *still* to be missing what I'm saying about Kiefer & Siobhan... which is that, based on how little I feel that we know, imo, they could have a serious relationship. OR NOT. (You keep missing the "or not" part.)
One more thing to add for Louise, when I said "GO CHECK" don't you wish you did? You listen to much to Christy's opinions and speculations. Next time please check the information yourself. I like you opinions very much Louise and I truely agreed 100% with your opinion regarding Siobhan. aKa
Also, aKa, re: a name being 'optional' here... yes, that's true.
It's also 'optional' that people cover their mouth when they cough in public or don't spit their chewing gum on the ground or in general be polite members of society.
There are lots of things that are 'optional' that people do because they're the right things to do... and, imo, owning one's own opinion falls into the 'right thing to do' category.
aKa, I had the date that Kiefer took Catherine to the Emmy's wrong, but that's irrelevant to the fact that I don't believe that Rocco has anything to do with the fact that Kiefer hasn't taken a date to a red carpet event since he took Tricia to the GG's. (... and, evidently, Louise doesn't either and I doubt whether he took Catherine to the Emmys in 2005 or 2006 is going to change her opinion about that. ;))
My point was - and still is - that except for those two awards shows, Kiefer hasn't taken a 'date' to any red carpet event since 24 started, which was before he even met Rocco... and he's been on a LOT of red carpets in the past seven years. :)
Okay Christy we agree about Rocco and Kiefer but after the tour Kiefer took Tricia to the event and after that zip so it only meant one thing and it was because of Rocco and their on going relationship. Respect if you will.
The info about Kiefer and John English has disappeared from the sites and that was on going since Julia and Kiefer building a place in Montana. Rumors were going on back then also.
It could have been the reason Kiefer left home at a young age.
I really need to go! aKa
I think that there's another easy guess (whether it's correct or not) besides "Rocco was mad" as to why Tricia was *poof* suddenly there and then she *poof* just as suddenly wasn't. I agree with you that her sudden appearance in January 2006 was related to how much time Kiefer had been spending with Rocco and how much of that time was captured on camera. Whether or not it really was more than a close friendship, my speculation is that it did start to raise flags (whether accurately or not) and there was a PR desire to counter with "see, he has a girlfriend!"
So, we saw Tricia in NYC a bit before the GG's, at the GG's and then in that one (imo, tipped) sighting at her daughter's birthday party. (Actually, I think that the parking lot stuff was tipped, but doubt that Kiefer was okay with the pics taken inside the bowling alley because that didn't seem to be part of the deal; he seemed genuinely ticked off in those indoor pics... to me, anyway). Then we saw her not at all until this past year sometime (and they really have been friends for years so seeing them together isn't all that surprising).
I think she disappeared (in terms of being suddenly close enough to Kiefer that he'd bring her as a date to an awards show... when he just doesn't do that as a regular matter of course) just as quickly as she appeared because her appearance - in the role of girlfriend - really was PR-related. If that speculation is correct, it has nothing to do with Rocco being angry.
Also, Kiefer grew up in an artsy, theater-y family. I doubt that homosexuality was taboo or that that's what would have driven him from home. If it were true.
AKA, I have listened to your posts here as I do other peoples too.I really don't think that anyone can accuse me of listening to christy's opinions too much lol(and I'm sure Christy will verify that! :)) I don't agree with you that Kiefer is gay but that doesn't mean I don't agree with you over other things.The PR thing with Tricia at GG could well be possible but I have no idea.I disagree about the golf course I really do but I'm not getting into that.I may sound like an idiot but..I'm still unsure of why you think he is gay?I mean you don't have anything concrete do you?As Christy doesn't about him being bi or with sib and I don't that he is single.We are all in the same boat but in different ways but if it's OK with everyone else I'd rather we just chatted out our opinions and not dictated to one another.Its OK that we don't agree.If we all agreed here we would have nothing to debate.And AKA-Ruining peoples sweet dreams of Kiefer?Don't you think that's out of line?That isn't nice.You don't know anything for sure and you really need to start realising that there is a possibility you are wrong as we all might be.I'm not afraid to say I'm wrong if Iam but I'm not sure we will ever know.Even if he did a Tom Cruise and bounced up and down on Oprah over a woman/man there would still be specualtion cos thats the nature of the game.Tom Cruise and Keanu Reeves have been dogged with rumours in the past too.It's Hollywood isn't it? Louise
aka, I think you make reasoned out points and anything and everything is absolutely possible with Kiefer.
Btw, once again if we are to believe based on timing and circumstances that the Tricia thing was a fixup for PR then I have no problem about thinking the same thing about the Siobhan thing. Timing - it was right after he was released from jail. That is when the PR machine with regard to Siobhan went into full swing; Reason - to demonstrate that Kiefer was a solid, mature and stable individual and PR - to me many, many of the pictures seemed to be tipped and staged for our benefit.
Remember, just like Tricia, Kiefer seemed to know Siobhan in some capacity prior to what appears to be the full blown PR move and like Tricia she is a known and acceptable quantity with a strong resume easily accepted by the hollywood powers that be. The only differ, IMHO, is the length of time but that is not even really proven cause we don't know how or if Kiefer and Siobhan are really together and also as some have stated Tricia unlike Siobhan had a child to protect and wouldn't be able to go along for too long....just my take!!
I agree anything is possible with Kiefer but..I still can't buy into the gay thing because I feel that from what we know/have seen of him that if he was gay then he wouldn't have spent his life in the closet.Why keep it a secret for so long he has no reason too.He is too head strong.He went away from home early to find his place in the world and there is nothing wrong with that.These are just my opinions obviously but I don't see any evidence to the contrary.I'm also a wee bit concerned that we are trying to label him in some way.I don't understand why he just can't be single and happy with that.The Siobhan thing has me totally confused and I'm not against saying her,or Tricia were PR moves but like you say they knew eachother,these women haven't been plucked from obscurity but could have been in the right place at the right time.I can go with that, but not to cover the fact he is gay but to cover the fact that he has messed up at times.I do think the Sib pics were staged we have seen too many for a start.Oh one thing I meant to ask,how do we know he stayed in that hotel in san diego?We didn't see any pics of them going in together?
As Anna said, just my take anyways.Louise
aka has alot of good points and so does Anna. I know that Rocco and Kiefer shared a suite in Japan together. It was in the doc video and in pics. Sorry Louise there is a difference between you sharing rooms with girls and Kiefer who is a public figure and needs to protect his reputation. It was only him and Rocco.
Also aka was right because Tricia came in right after the tour when Rocco and the rumours got started. Kiefer has not taken another women to any events since Tricia not even Siobhan, the world famous no show at the Walk of Fame. Penny's site posted from a inside source that Rocco was there but no Siobhan. She hasn't been to any of Kiefers events.
This doesn't prove anything but neither does anyone have proof of Kiefer and Siobhan in any kind of relationship. I'm with the same opinion that it was all PR related with them. It would seem Linda is right that Kiefer just willn't come clean with his relationship. I believe he willn't because then it will be a lie. Nothing else makes sense to me if it is only a friend or girlfriend. What's the big deal!! Something is not right with that picture.
Kiefer showed more affection to Rocco then he has with Siobhan with photos. It seems alot of us here are in agreement that you can tell alot about body language from pics. Its a question mark for me and always has been with Kiefer and Rocco? Its possible.
The rumuor were going around Lousie maybe you missed some of them but "if" Kiefer ever came clean about being gay just think of what it would have done to his career as Jack Bauer the hero.
Hi anonymous I hear what you are saying there but rocco has a girlfriend and a child so i'm confused with that one.If Kiefer had gone to all this trouble of hiding away from his sexuality then why on earth would he blow himself out of the water and share that room with Rocco?As you say he has to protect his reputation.So,that doesn't make sense to me.I didn't know that Rocco was at the awards I saw no photo of him so i hadn't realised but that still isn't concrete to me, there was loads of people there!.If they were in love then why not just come out and tell everyone sooner?
Louise
I agree what you say about 24,but that doesnt explain why he didn't come out prior to 24.What about the rest of his life.Why marry 2 women? He has said he is single,I see no signs he is gay,and yes I have gay friends so I know many of the signs,he spends time with men.so what i spend time with women.Ok,he is in the public eye I understand that but many actors are gay.So why keep it hidden.If Sib hadn't disappeared off the radar and we saw them holding hands and kissing and planning a wedding we wouldn't be having this conversation would we?Just because he doesn't want to be with/commit to/whatever with Siobhan does not mean he is gay.This woman,in my opinion,seems to have stirred up a hornets nest in every way.Louise
Jeezzz!
You girls make a good argument, are you lawyer's or somethin!
I see both sides here.To me, in my humble opinion I don't think he is gay,just messed up and needs to sort his shit out.
But,I will say two things:
1-On occasion his mannerisms have reminded me of a gay friend I've known for years.-Just the way he runs,carries a bag.This no doubt makes no sense to you here but just an observation.
2-I read in a U.S magazine that when he was asked by the interviewer what he found attractive in a woman, Kiefer's reply was strange.He said what he found attractive in ANYBODY is something elusive.This seemed like a strange answer.He directed the qustion away from women.
I'm 98% sure he isn't gay.. but as you have all said nobody seems to know for sure...
Siobhan IMO is bad, bad news..
Hey Louise, I don't know if Kiefer is gay. It certainly is a possibility but it's also possible he is bi-sexual or completely heterosexual. I don't know if you could go by his marriages because they both basically fell apart and were over before they were even started. He stayed married to Kelly for 12 years but for all purposes they were not married in the true meaning of the word. Of course that may just mean he doesn't like being in a one woman relationship. We do know that Kiefer likes to visit strip clubs and such and that has been a pattern going back to Julia days.......
But regardless of Kiefer's sexuality, I don't believe Siobhan is the love of his life. Not by a long shot.....
Hey Linda, We can all agree Kiefer is no saint,perhaps that's part of the attraction?Lol.I think it is possible that he doesn't like being with just one woman.He appears to have the best intentions and then it all goes haywire half way through! :)The women he has been with seem to have a sadness about them at times and I'm certain they always hope for more.That they will be the one to change him from his wild ways?I saw a picture of him with Catherine in a bar and she is sat beside him and looks terribly miserable. You know my feelings on Siobhan.It's all a shame really.At 42 it would be nice to see him settled.
I hope that one day he will find peace because I do feel that he is unhappy alot of the time.Louise
Louise, the speculation about Kiefer being gay (or bisexual) goes back way before Siobhan. As someone (it was you, wasn't it?)) mentioned up-thread, it's not exactly a rare rumor regarding actors... and he's had his share of speculation - whether or not it's accurate - along those lines through the years. aKa said she's been 'researching' that subject for 5 years, i.e. pre-Siobhan. This isn't a "Siobhan effect" conversation. Truly. :)
I agree with 2:37 that Kiefer has some fairly effeminate traits. The very first time I saw him on a talk show, I thought he might be gay. (And my gaydar tends to be decent in general.) But I soon learned more about him and came to believe that, while he may be bisexual (more like "omnisexual" is what I really think... ;)), he's not flat-out gay. I do believe that he's attracted to/has had real relationships with women. I just also think that bisexuality, maybe not acted on particularly frequently but there (something that's true for some people who definitely overall identify as hetereosexual), is a possibility. Don't know, but it seems possible to me.
p.s. re: Rocco, I don't believe that he does have a steady girlfriend currently... or, at least, didn't at the time when he and Kiefer were spending a lot of time together. Not a steady one, anyway. I don't believe that he's been in a relationship with the mother of his son for a long time. In any case, *if* there ever was anything beyond friendship between Kiefer and Rocco, I think it would've been a case of two essentially hetereosexual people having a bisexual experience. It happens. :) But who knows whether or not it did in this case.
p.s. to 2:37pm, I ***love*** his answer about how what he finds attractive in ANYBODY is elusive. I love that answer because I feel exactly the same way. There are things that I love, but it's how they all come together in a given person that makes that person someone I want to get to know better... as a friend or more.
Louise we don't hear wedding bells do we and like Christy said the hornets nest was talked about even before Siobhan came on the scene. I been hearing the rumuors forever off and on. For some reason Kiefer can't make it with a woman. I still think alot of it was staged by him.
Don't forget Kiefers career wasn't going anywhere nor was being gay acceptable in Hollywood in his time. His career wasn't going anywhere except playing character roles and he needed the money so he took whatever he could as a actor. He wasn't about to blow the only thing he was educated enough to do by announcing he was gay. He would have never gotten the 24 role if he did.
Still you need to factor in his macho father,brothers and daughter. Everyone in my opinion believes its his father who is distance from Kiefer but I feel it has always been Kiefer who likes to keep that distance. This also could have been the reason he left home at a young age 15 or 16. We don't know but thats when guys test out their sexuality or younger.
Like Christy said, the girlfriend and child happen when Rocco was 20. I never heard of Rocco being with anyone else.
A woman wrestler wrote an article "just before" Kiefer went to San Deigo about her meeting Kiefer in NY at Best Buys and went on to say that Kiefer had very feminine mannerisms & Wrestling has a big fan base. Did you read the article Louise? Its not talboid reading and other people have said more or less the same thing through the years. aKa
Hi Christy, I just meant in reference to Siobhan that everything seems to have gone off the deep end alittle since she showed up thats all it was a "off the cuff" remark :)
Hi AKA, I only joined a forum last year and previous to watching 24,I wasn't an avid fan although I liked him.I have read a few little things but nothing concrete just little snippets of things from when he has been out drinking.Will have a look back at some articles and I didn't see that wrestler article either.Where was that?Thanks for the info on Rocco too I didn't know that I had just heard he had a girlfriend and child.If it was when he was 20 the child must be older than I thought then.This is why it's good to chat so we can discuss all the amount of info out there,because it's overwhelming at times.Louise
AKA, i've heard from a Rocco fan who saw him in a concert that he has a girlfriend and that fan said she saw her and that she was not so pretty... So, it's difficult for me to believe the fact that Rocco is gay or even Kiefer. I have the impression some people here doesn't accept the relationship between Kiefer and Siobhan so they tell themselves some stories...
so sad ... If Kiefer is gay, why there are those sightings with many women, Wentworth Miller is gay, too much sightings alone with men...but Kiefer LOL. If he is, i'm wonder woman.
aKa, the "wrestling woman's" blog wasn't an "article"... it was a blog. And, while I do think that Kiefer has some characteristically effeminate traits (that, actually, a lot of actors share... the way he sits with his legs crossed, for example, is seen throughout the acting community; his clearly heterosexual father, for example, sits the same way... I think it's the way that people who've spent a lot of time on talk shows learn to sit... ;)), her response to meeting him was way over-the-top. Apparently, she had it in her mind that "Jack Bauer" was a big guy... and Kiefer surely isn't that. And her responses flowed from there. Hardly an authoritative source. ;)
9:32am, while I do think there could, potentially, be something to Kiefer having at least a bit of a bisexual streak (as, again, lots of people in that business do), I agree that he's not "gay" (as in completely homosexual). The same certainly could be true (or not) of Rocco. Having a girlfriend and/or child doesn't mean that a man never could be involved with another man. Human beings and human sexuality are way more complex than that. That said, my gut instinct is that, no matter how long aKa has been interested in the question of whether or not Kiefer is straight, bisexual or gay, her specific interest at this point is in, as you've said, proving that he's not in an relationship with Siobhan.
We would like to read where your friend posted this info at Wonder Woman.
Jumping into the fray *will think better of it later*
/starts rant
Ever think that maybe there's no wedding bells because the last two marriages cost him a bundle? That he can't make it long term with 'A' woman because he finds himself drawn to 'other' women?
It's not rocket science that his marriages have failed. He's already admitted that he fails as a husband. Yet he's still able to remain friends with them and the children remain close to him. He must be, as he has also said, a really great friend. And someone who can be trusted and counted on.
What he's not good at apparently is staying monogamous. Add in his partying and drinking ways and that doesn't exactly make him great long term marriage material now does it?
And before labeling and speculating on something that we have no knowledge of being true why don't we take a brief look at his known gf's over the years. Were they all PR?
The girl he first slept with as a young teenager?
The gf that lost all his money on the road trip between NYC and LA when he was first starting out?
The older woman that he met on the set of A Killing Time that created his beautiful daughter?
Julia Roberts when they were both young and foolish in courting the press? Btw, still love the drunken chocolate cake feeding, kissing video Hot, Hot, Hot!! and also set the stage of the "I learned my lesson the hard way and won't expose my love life to the press ever again" epiphany that he obviously had. Hence little to no pda anymore. No screaming I'm in love from the rooftops.
So is it really a surprise that he's been relatively quiet about Siobahn? Or Kelly for that matter? Or Catherine? Emma and how many faceless/nameless others?
There definitely has been more with Siobhan than the others since Julia. Why? The guy just came off a pretty difficult publicity year. So yeah, he had to be more out front with his relationship and that he was a 'changed' man when it came to partying. But if you look back prior to September - he was quietly spending time with her already and very under the radar. Just like his normal MO.
So just because he had to deal with his publicity issue surrounding the DUI. Is his relationship, whatever it is with Siobhan a sham? And it's nothing more than a cover up of his suddenly changed orientation? Does that really make sense?
Am I blind that he's likely experimented sexually? No, personally I think he has the capacity to love and be fully open. So I can easily see him as having had bi encounters. But really, beside him and the other parties who the hell really knows. And if one of them was Rocco, then more power to them both because they are both Hot!
But let's also be clear, being bi is not the same as being gay. Not that there is anything wrong with either, both or neither. There is only one site that I've ever come across that has labeled him as bi. The rest either don't know for sure or the question has either been shot down or has never taken hold. From what I have seen - it's mostly speculation by women who can't seem to fathom either his failure at marriage or kind of find it hot to ponder him with another good looking man. *wink*
But just the same, maybe, just maybe Kiefer saw a lot of himself in Rocco and wanted to help him out because he could. Maybe, just maybe, in signing Rocco to his label he felt some personal responsibility for making him successful. And along the way they became great friends. Who the hell knows. (And btw Manu was also on that trip to Japan - so perhaps it was a three-way LOL!! That would ahve been HOT! but at the same time causes me to *rolls eyes*)
But to turn whatever honest feelings he has for Rocco into something less honorable or sorid and untruthful because some don't like the idea of him being with his current gf or don't understand their relationship when it is none of our business in the first place is when rumor and speculation has gone TOO FAR imo.
I'm glad that he's someone who does NOT want to know what is written about him on the internet. Because he's right. It's often mean and ugly.
What I'll never understand is why a segment of fans can't just be happy for him and treat him as an adult that can make his own decisions and live his life without scrutinizing his every relationship move or lack of pda he makes.
And find acceptance in who he chooses to be with, whether a guy, a girl or both. Instead it's apparently more interesting to tear them apart and him too in the process.
At least he understands it enough to have gotten the I Trust You to Kill Me tattoo to remind him. Too bad, that this thread also proves him right. *sigh*
I for one am glad that he tries to protect the privacy of those involved in this life.
/End rant and back to lapping up all the little glimpses he does give into his life because he's gorgeous and he seems to live life to it's fullest.
Go Kiefer! 7 days to 24 Premiere! YAY! :D
D2
i've never said i have red this info about Rocco's girlfriend, i 've said "i have HEARD "!
Now, if you want Kiefer to be gay in your world ! You are free to think what you want like he can't make love with a woman or Siobhan (poor girl, i forgot she is gay too, LOL).
In fact, she has been married with David who was gay too LOL. She is very stupid, she likes women and she 's going with gay men.
Sorry, i'm joking !
i wish everyone here an happy new year.
D2, exactly!
... and exactly and Happy New Year to you too, Wonder Woman!
:)
Ugh... lost the rest of the post up there.
To summarize. Can he be bi? yes. Is he? Who knows. There has only been one site that lists bi actors that I've seen where he's on it. But all other sites either have refuted it or the question dies because of no proof.
Does bi mean he's gay? No. And his own track record with women should at least leave no doubt of that.
As for Rocco. Maybe, just maybe Kiefer saw a lot of himself in him. And wanted to help him make it. By signing him to his label he probably feels a great deal of personal responsibility to him. And they seem to be really great friends.
Were they ever together? In my dreams they were *wink* but in reality who knows. Were they alone in Japan - yeah with Manu too. Maybe it was a threesome. That just upped the drool factor. LOL!
But how much of these rumors are just women trying to explain away is failure at marriage and fantasies about him with another hot guy?
:D
... and more exactly, D2! :)
D2 You are officially my new best friend! Lol, That is my take too especially the rocco part. Think we are all starting to talk more sense now thankgod.Christy you are right about the leg crossing thing.I have also noticed it in tall or slim men,(my ex was 6'4" and he sat that way) it seems to be more comfortable for them so I don't think we can go off that mannerism either.Louise
Happy New Year Wonder woman :)
haha ..Christy is relentless. For every post anyone makes here, she will make five!!!!!!! Give it up folks, she is the number one "miss kiefer know it all!"
You seem to have misread (or not read at all) both the content and tenor of current conversation, 3:16, whomever you may be. Almost as if you've just got a bug up your butt about my very existence. Or something. :)
No D2, I certainly don't think they are all PR at all and have my doubts if Kiefer is gay. But my question still is the same then, why all the PR with Siobhan; just doesn't make sense. Why can't she just be his girlfriend and be done with it. Why all the PR, why all the agreements and rehearsals, et. al. Doesn't make sense. It really doesn't all seem necessary to me.
Btw, it's curious to me cause Kiefer isn't Brad Pitt. He isn't followed by paparazzi all the time or is he harrassed by the media in anyway. In fact, IMO, the only time he is followed by the paparazzi is when he is the one doing the tipping so he stays in the news!!
2:37, I just read your post and yes, I had a similar feeling to that response. I think it had something to do with mystery but I felt the question was women specific and Kiefer sort of dodged the question, IMHO.
aka, I personally don't think Kiefer is gay although I know he was caught in gay bar(s) and kissing men, etc. and he does seem very close to Rocco but I think he is just very dedicated to Rocco's career as he seems to be for everyone on the IW's label.
I do as I have stated many times find the Siobhan relationship pecululiar in my personal feelings on the matter.
aka, what I find strange about the Siobhan relationship is how Kiefer was so willing to put the whole thing out there in the beginning and for a few months and even, IMHO, the recent pictures in San Diego but certainly the April into May pictures that he would now suddenly turn around and have agreements not to take her to things like the walk of fame where she could have stayed in the background and other things. This is my personal feeling on the matter. Btw, if anyone doubts the power of Kiefer and his PR abilities, I noticed today we got yet another mug shot of a famous person. Yet, Kiefer is the one person who they have managed to miss. Anyone wonder how that is. I don't. I think he knows how to work the system and uses it to his very advantgage. Please don't take this as a critism of Kiefer, it isn't. Btw, aka I stick by my comments about Kiefer not wanting to lie but I don't believe it's to cover up him not being gay. I believe it's cause he doesn't want to mislead about how serious he and Siobhan are but he is still willing to put out photos. That's the conflict, again in my opinion.
As for Kiefer and relationships I think Louise is on target. I think Kiefer feels strong at the beginning and then he loses his way. Maybe not but that fits the pattern on all of the romances we know about including Jennifer.....
aka, obviously you may know more about the John English situation that you can't publish. I know nothing of that situation other than he asked Kiefer to join him as his roping partner so I am working from that......
Also, I meant to say he doesn't want to mislead about how serious he and Siobhan may or may not be...I just don't know on that either. I am just commenting on the outer parameters of this relationship.......
Why not consider that Kiefer and Siobhan were seeing where there relationship was going early on and hence all the pics and then the relationship started to fade so ther are less pics. I personally think that Siobhan is the one tipping the paps. As for Kiefer being gay I don't believe it for a minute.
con't I think that Kiefer spend a lot of time with Rocco because he was excited about his new venture with IW and wanted it to be a success. Kiefer has said on numerous occasions that he wants to be a rock star so promoting one is the next best thing. Not gay just enjoying his new adventure.
I also wanted to say that I am glad that Kiefer doesn't read the internet because the amount of posts about his relationship and whether or not he is gay would not do anything for his confidence. You ladies need to move on.
Hey 6:00 PM, I believed at the beginning Siobhan was tipping the paps as well but it seemed obvious at least to me that Kiefer knew what he was doing with the Pastis and Waverly Inn and therefore he was the one notifying them so I couldn't quite understand how it would suddenly switch to her but hey this whole thing can twist you into a pretzel trying to figure it all out, LOL!! Although, nothing saying Siobhan doesn't approve. Seems to me she loves the cameras!!
Btw, to me this one seems more like the Tricia affair as we went over. If you notice he went out with Catherine, Jennifer, Lady in Scrubs and even sightings with Reiko and we didn't get scores of pics. We only got scores of pics with Tricia and now Siobhan both of which came as seemingly questionable moments for Kiefer with regard to the press/studios......in my personal opinion.
6:05 PM, Kiefer shouldn't mind reading the internet since he is the one controlling most of his press, LOL!!
Linda, I don't think he controls the press when it comes to people discussing whether or not he is gay. Look at the number of women he has been with or rumoured to be with. I just don't think he is gay. But if he is he is still an awesome and talented actor.
Meg,
I think you may be forgetting that he had just got out of jail when all the Kiefer implemented press started happening during the Spring. It imo was to reintroduce him back into normal life. And get ready for when he started the talk show circuit again.
The best defense is a strong offense and having him show that he is moving on with his life and getting back to normal was likely a major consideration in starting to tip photos of him and Siobhan. But to be clear they were also at least partially seeing each other prior to the NYC photos. So who knows how involved they were then or how serious.
It's also impossible to know what he was thinking about during all that time alone during those 48 days. Maybe he decided to really make some changes in his life.
For some reason he also was compelled to finalize his divorce from Kelly this year too. Why?
Maybe to finally really move on and stop living either in the past or in limbo. Who knows. But to say that he's only done one out of the ordinary thing this year is forgetting all that's gone on.
His IW studio and house is up for sale.
He bought a new and seemingly permanent home in NY. (personally I think that's to make it easier to continue to drink and not have to drive. But that is speculation on my part.) But I also think he really loves the city. That he really likes being near his daughter. That he likes the type of lifestyle that comes with that type of urban living. And maybe, just maybe it's because he'd liked to spend more time with and see if there is something real between him and Siobhan. Or not.
But adding it all up - he's making a very outward show to the world and the industry that he is healthy, in shape and getting his life on track.
The Letterman interview went well and for the most part reporters aren't dogging him on the DUI/jail story and the tabs aren't either. Even when it's pretty obvious that he's still drinking and sometimes to excess.
So I guess for me, I see this whole year as being one big coming out party as the new and improved and mature Kiefer ending with the Star on the walk of fame presentation. He weathered the storm and now he can move on and go back to protecting his privacy if he so chooses.
D2
Continued...
His IW studio and house is up for sale.
He bought a new and seemingly permanent home in NY. (personally I think that's to make it easier to continue to drink and not have to drive. But that is speculation on my part.) But I also think he really loves the city. That he really likes being near his daughter. That he likes the type of lifestyle that comes with that type of urban living. And maybe, just maybe it's because he'd liked to spend more time with and see if there is something real between him and Siobhan. Or not.
But adding it all up - he's making a very outward show to the world and the industry that he is healthy, in shape and getting his life on track.
The Letterman interview went well and for the most part reporters aren't dogging him on the DUI/jail story and the tabs aren't either. Even when it's pretty obvious that he's still drinking and sometimes to excess.
So I guess for me, I see this whole year as being one big coming out party as the new and improved and mature Kiefer ending with the Star on the walk of fame presentation. He weathered the storm and now he can move on and go back to protecting his privacy if he so chooses.
D2
Just to be clear though. Just because I believe he's allowed (tipped) so many photo's to be taken of him and Siobhan I don't think it's the same as Tricia. The length of time and the variety of places and the flying between coasts as well as over to Paris is far more commitment than a few local photo ops with Tricia.
It honestly appears that he's looking to make an effort to make whatever relationship he has with Siobhan work. It just so happens that he had to also open up this part of his life to the press at the same time to counter the potential for negative publicity and fallout from his error in judgment earlier in the year.
I further think is refusal to show too much if none at all pda is his one piece of control over his personal life that he's guarding as private. IOW, you can take our picture but I'm not going to give you anything salacious that will amp us the is he, isn't he going to marry her rumor mill.
He certainly understands the game and he's playing both sides. Taking the good side of the publicity while holding on to some degree of privacy imo.
D2
Linda - I used to think that Kiefer's publicists were masters of keeping his mug shots out of the press too... until I found out that the city of LA proper (where Kiefer has been arrested all four times) doesn't release mug shots.
As for aKa's "other" knowledge about John English, I genuinely don't believe she has any... beyond rumors... which are always the same in tone and tenor. Replace Rocco's name with John's and "music" with "rodeo" and you'll have them. Betcha. :)
D2, since we're on the subject of marriage (or not ;)), will you marry me?
Wait... are we now on the subject of both gayness AND marriage? Eep!
;)
D2 you most recent comments make a lot of sense.
LOL Christy!
We'd have to wait for Prop 8 to be overturned and both of us to turn gay like apparently a CLBG has - oh wait - snap! Heh! ;P
Thanks Anonymous. I've tried.
Oh yeah... now that you mention it...
Well, I dunno about the likelihood of the latter, but here's hoping that the former happens sooner rather than later! :D
Loved Redemption tonight! And exactly 7 days from now I'll have O.D. on the Season 7 Premiere! So happy I can hardly stand it. YAY!!! :)
D2 I'm glad that you can have adult conversation so let me tell you about one adult story because there are many just like it.James McGreevey was governor of New Jersey you might say he was caught with his pants down with another man. McGreevey has a daughter Moray from his "first marriage" to a Canadian and another daughter Jacqueline from his "2nd marriage" to a Portaguese,they separated after he came out of the closet and stated"My truth is that I am a gay American." His exwife wrote she would never have married him if she had known he was gay, nor would she have choosen to have a gay man to father her child. Does this statement mean he was Bisexual or gay before he came out of the closet?
People want to excuse Kiefers relationships with women because of his drinking but alot of marriages and relationships make it with the partner who drinks.What do you or any of us no about Kiefers strange marriage that went on for 12 yrs. What women would put up with him being in a relationship with other women like Catherine. What happen when Kiefer was questioned about whether they were engaged and his answer was "its impossible since I'm already married".Hell that must have hurt Cath very much.He could have said, we are just dating.Kiefer never put a label on any relationship with a women. The Media and his fans put those labels on him just like you are doing with Siobhan. There is no harm in Kiefer saying we are just dating if that is the case.If you can put a label on Kiefer why can't I do the same. Your not sure of anything just like me. aKa
Christy, I guess if you think its possible Kiefer is bisexual then Rocco must be Kiefers lover in LA and Siobhan in NY. They do look something alike Rocco with dark hair and brown eyes and Siob with dark hair and brown eyes. How Cute! It must have been very hard deciding which one to take to the Walk of Fame. I wonder who won! Dee
To Louise..
The woman wrestler who wrote the blog was very much excited and dying to meet Kiefer for the very first time. She was a big fan of 24 and she collected every thing on Kiefer and 24. She actually cried during 24:Redemption. She considered camping out the night before because she got into a panick she might miss meeting him in NY Best Buys. She was surprised that Kiefer didn't have a line that circled around the block multiple times. She got there at 6:15 and was the 90th person in line. She questioned if there was a bomb threat that caused the low attendance. She said, Kiefer is the star of the best TV show except wrestling.This was her only opportunity to meet Kiefer who plays a larger than life action hero that has saved the country, the president and even the world. It was finally her turn in line to meet him and she was devastated. He was so tiny and she was bigger than Kiefer. His body movements were dainty and feminine, he moved like he was a porcelain doll. This she said was worst than finding out there is no Santa Claus and no Easter Bunny! The actor that plays the greatest action hero is a sissy-midget. Ughhh! Now I will never watch 24 the same again she writes. She said the lesson to this sad geeky story is that with the right TV product you can easily make a 5'6" sissy of a man appear larger than life and look like a ass kicker.She Missy Hyatt didn't use the word gay but she is well known woman wrestler. She doesn't appear to be that big herself except her boos and height.
Linda,Christy,D2 and Anon at 6.00.I think you are all right on with your assumptions.Aka, I feel,IMHO, that you are overly obsessed with Kiefer being gay.I'm beginning to wonder if you are in fact a gay man,not that I object of course, but I'm finding it very hard to decipher your answers here which seem to me to be "well off the deep end." There is a danger,for all of us, to read too much into things that are not actually there.I'm trying to stay impartial in the fact that I will listen, and if I see PROOF than I will accept it, but you are forcing this thing so much without any actual proof I'm beginning to wonder if there is not more to it with you here.Louise
Louise I wrote to you about the wrestler but forgot to add my name. This doesn't imply Kiefer is gay it was something we were talking about and Christy add too about stuff being written of Kiefer feminine mannerism. Sitting with his legs crossed wasn't one of them. Lots of men sit with their legs crossed I never knew that was a sign of anyone being gay. aKa
AKA I think the point with crossing legs is is that its quite a feminine mannerism.I've always thought so anyway.Louise
AKA I think the point with crossing legs is is that its quite a feminine mannerism.I've always thought so anyway.Louise
3:07 AM, yes I read that story from the woman wrestler. At first I thought she was a bit harsh but to be honest I think she was just disappointed and tried to relay those emotions. I also think they were accurate which is not to label Kiefer's preference it is just describing his traits many of which I see in interviews and videos, etc.
aka, as for his response to the question regarding Catherine I too thought how hurtful that must have been. I think Catherine was a beautiful woman and she must have had high hopes for her and Kiefer. Btw, I thought Kiefer's quick engagement denial to Siobhan in June was a similar effect. I was not sure it was even necessary since he cultivated the story to start with....
As for Kiefer being an adult yes he is so he should and I believe does understand that speculation about a star's romances has forever been part of the Hollywood scene. The big difference is that in the old studio days the studios controlled all of it. I believe now as we see in the case of Kiefer that the stars have taken over that department. Btw, if a star such as Kiefer or any other have a right to run a publicity tour which by nature is used to deceive than I see no reason why such sympathy for a star's being.....I have stated before that I believe in my opinion that Kiefer clearly knows he is deceiving in some way and that is why he chooses not to directly address the Siobhan questions in interviews even the most harmless of questions. Just my take on the matter.
Anna, and that is also what I have been saying about Kiefer not wanting to discuss the matter cause it would be outright lying and I don't think he wants to do that. I even find it hard to believe he wants to be deceiving but I also think he does what is necessary to protect first and foremost his livelihood and there is nothing wrong with that, IMHO!!
As for his preferences who knows. If true what aka believes than he has hid it well all these 20 years or so that he has been in the public eye and that is a very long time although I would say that Kiefer has also been very good at living under the radar as the media probably didn't even scratch the surface even in his younger days of all the bars, etc. we know he hit.
Anna and Linda,good point regarding he doesn't want to lie so he says nothing.Personally I think she is out of the picture or if she appears it will be fleetingly.I'm not slating him here but I feel he has lost interst in her,JMHO as the sightings have dwindled so much.I also agree that he has a livelihood to protect which we cannot forget either.
See, I know some will disagree but this is my take for as little its worth.Some people are more comfortable with the opposite of sex,some more comfortable with the same sex.I'm talking about friendship here. For me I actually get on with men more eaily than I do ssome women,not sure why that is but its just the way Iam.Maybe Kiefer is more comfortable around men as friends.Why do we think Kiefer and Rocco shared a room btw cos to me I don't think they did.Is it because they left that room togther on ITYTKM? He does let his guard down alot,you just have to look at ITYTKM to see that.He seemed to me in that docu that he wanted people to see the real him and he put himself out on a limb,IMO,which is why I don't believe he is gay as Linda said he has done well to hide it if he is.
Anna and Linda,good point regarding he doesn't want to lie so he says nothing.Personally I think she is out of the picture or if she appears it will be fleetingly.I'm not slating him here but I feel he has lost interst in her,JMHO as the sightings have dwindled so much.I also agree that he has a livelihood to protect which we cannot forget either.
See, I know some will disagree but this is my take for as little its worth.Some people are more comfortable with the opposite of sex,some more comfortable with the same sex.I'm talking about friendship here. For me I actually get on with men more eaily than I do ssome women,not sure why that is but its just the way Iam.Maybe Kiefer is more comfortable around men as friends.Why do we think Kiefer and Rocco shared a room btw cos to me I don't think they did.Is it because they left that room togther on ITYTKM? He does let his guard down alot,you just have to look at ITYTKM to see that.He seemed to me in that docu that he wanted people to see the real him and he put himself out on a limb,IMO,which is why I don't believe he is gay as Linda said he has done well to hide it if he is.
I am a woman Louise but I really been looking into whether Kiefer could be gay or not,if he is bi what is the differences when he is still attracted to men. They were alot of things Kiefer did that were strange/out of character when he did interviews/on camera & off he was like day and night. The internet didn't have all the resources as it has now. Kiefer only had a few fan sites. What took me by surprise with Kiefer was the fact he was in Iceland with Rocco "before he promoted him". In 03 or 04 then 05 when they did the doc. Why it was so surprising to me was he had a young daughter and 2 boys he was helping Kelly to raise and here he was away on Christmas break with Rocco. Most people spend that time with there children. Even if Kiefer was separate from Kelly Kiefer could have done something to be with his kids on Christmas break but he was a million miles away. The pics of him and Kiefer in Iceland came from a fan not the paps. He went pretty far to avoid them. They said he was there to visit with a girlfriend. The girl looked like she was 20, since when has Kiefer ever dated a girl that young(Here to find out later in the doc he was friends with her father who owns a restaurant & he is Kiefers age).He got caught with the fan pic and had to come up with something so the media mentioned him dating her. I just thought it was strange that he didn't take his children on that trip or a skiing trip whatever. This is when I started my research on whether he was gay. This is only the tip of the iceberg for me. I believe it started in 03 with Rocco.
Sorry forgot to add my name @10:27 aKa...Louise trust me Kiefer and Rocco shared a room. You need to study the doc bedroom and bathroom and the pics. The pic with Kiefer in the suite with just a towel around his wrist. Christy can confirm it. aKa
I will continue later Louise about John English but I don't have the time. I just want you to know that none of my reseach is 100% about whether Kiefer is gay or not but neither does anyone else have answers to who Kiefer real is. And Kiefer never confirmed to anyone about his relationship with Siobhan. Which could have been so easy. What did his father teach him..."Never get catch in a lie" I believe that implies in acting and in his personal life. Kiefer is a very focus and intelligent guy and then some. I give him a A+ for being so so creative in his personal life when sticking to the truth. aKa
aka, yes, I remember that supposed girlfriend from Iceland. That was totally weird to me. Didn't she even give an interview and talk about Kiefer and then he brought her to NY. The girl from Brazil gave an interview as well about her date(s) with him.
I also agree that Donald's advice extends to his personal life and even if it didn't I think Kiefer would carry it over. Not saying he is or isn't but some of these relationships are abit strange and Kiefer is extremely dodgy with questions. Much more than necessary especially since he gives out so much of himself and even gives out info of private dating of Sarah and Michelle. I don't buy that they agree to it. Their lives are personal but Kiefer seems more comfortable talking about them but I think because that is truth which is the more natural way to go. If you are correct then I give Kiefer credit for trying his best to be truthful. I think Kiefer has demons and maybe this is one. It would not be easy for him to discuss and come out if that was necessary and I am not saying it is either way just offering analysis on the difficulty.
Geeh, Anna, that's an interesting point you make about Kiefer talking about Sarah and Michelle and their dating lives, yet he doesn't reveal much about his own. I never thought about that before, but you're right. He's not over-the-top in discussing their personal lives, and that's probably why that point never occured to me before, but, by comparion at least, it speaks to how closed he is about talking about his own. I wonder if they have any feelings about that? I don't necessarily think it means he's gay or bi, but it's interesting, anyway.
Carla
I just have to comment on the Christmas thing and why he spent it with Rocco, now let me say that I really don't have an opinion of weather of not he is gay or bi or straight and I would not be shocked at any of those options. anyway, here goes. I think that Kiefer stretches the truth in his mind as to how close he really is to his family and I believe that Christmas is not a really good time for him, don't know why I get that vibe, I just do. I think that maybe spending time with Rocco taht year just gave him something to do. Also I saw in an interview him talking about the actual tour he stated that he didn't have anyone to spend his holidays with so he decided to go on tour with them. Also that one year he took friend skying with him. Just doesn't sound like someone who is close to his family or has many options at Christmas, which I find very sad.
I haven't read all of the posts from the last couple of days (yet) but, in skimming just now, I caught something with in one of aKa's posts that I've seen here before and just wanted to clarify a little bit.
When Kiefer quotes his dad as telling him "don't get caught in a lie," he's not talking about the press or even life in general... he's talking about acting. That is, the question he's answering is, "what advice has your dad given you about acting?" At least that's very very much how I remember it.
imo, it's a rather large misconception to believe that celebrities in general tell The Whole Truth about every aspect of their lives publicly. That is to say that I think that they all tell the public story that they want to tell via both commission and ommission. I think that Kiefer is like all celebrities in this... i.e., he reveals what he wants to reveal, doesn't reveal what he doesn't want to reveal, and sometimes says things that are flat-out untrue... and, speaking for myself, I don't consider that a "lie"... I consider it "publicity." I personally don't believe that celebrities owe us any information about their personal lives that they don't want to share... whatever that information may be.
Some really great posts on this thread and information here from all of you, and every piece of info seems to be covered.
to me I find it interesting what one of you girls said about kiefer's relationship with his family.From my own experiences and from what I see from afar, IMHO, I feel that kiefer likes to pretend he has a closer relationship than he really has with them. In his earlier life he has been selfish,I'm not saying he has meant to but he seems to have been a "late maturer" from where I have sat,drinking,drugs,partying...
I'm under no illusion,whilst Sarah was very young he was running around Hollywood with the hot new Julia Roberts,that must have had an impact on his first wife and daughters.His second wife was left at home whilst he bummed around from rodeo to rodeo.I realise you will all think I'm being harsh here,I'm not intentionally, but I think Kiefer is a very selfish man and has put his career before anything else.I hope that as he has gotten older he has realised his mistakes as a young man and is trying to rectify them as he is a very talented man.Is he or isn't he gay?I don't think he is.I believe he just wants to be "one of the guy's" and has a short attention span when it comes to beautiful women.
Sincerely hope I haven't waded in here and upset anyone but that is how I feel.Happpy New Year Everyone!
Ann:)
....Sorry that was me,Ann above @ 3.19.just to add that perhaps the reason he spends holidays and christmas alone or with friends is because as he was absent from sarah's (and his step-children's life) whilst they were young they perhaps would prefer to spend it with their mother's respectively.
I for one don't believe he spends it with Camellia is it?and her boyfriend.It's very sad anyway.
Thanks.
1:16, yes I agree with you and btw, I get the same vibe as you do and definitely yes about Kiefer stretching the truth as relates to family. I mean I believe it was Camilia, not Kelly who Kiefer stated in the MV interview that he spends Christmas with her and her boyfriend Jeff - when was that???, LOL. See he even tells us that Camilia has a boyfriend and his name, LOL
And yes, Carla definitely not over the top. Obviously he is talking about it as relates to him as a father and it is sometimes cute but revealing nevertheless and certainly personal to them. I remember my parents telling stories to people about me that they thought were just cute and it simply embarrassed me so imagine him telling the world, LOL.
I agree with everything you say Ann, and by the way I was the one who posted about the Christmas stuff above, I just forgot to tpe my name. And I don't believe for one second that he spends it with Camellia either, not unless the relationship has changed since she took him back to court a few years ago , she sure didn't seem happy with him then.
Pam
Christy if you believe it is possible for Kiefer to be bisexual who was the man in his life to lead you to believe it is a possiblity? It had to be someone or the idea wouldn't have entered your mind. Thanks aKa
Just saw new pic of him over at Benny's site, going to David Letterman. looks like he is carrying his trademark cigs, I wish he would quit those things, his teeth are getting so yellow, and they are so bad for him.
Pam
Hey Pam, hope you had a wonderful New Years. I am with you. I think he is trying to give them up but doesn't look like it completely. I noticed the yellow teeth at the walk as well but I am like you and have concern for his health. Between the smoking and drinking, Ugh!!
Btw, I didn't believe that about Camilia myself and when I read that it took me by surprise. Seems to come out of left field. I remember hearing about her taking him back to court but didn't remember the details.
aKa, it wasn't a specific person who made me think it's possible that Kiefer's bisexual (though, to be clear, I have no idea whether or not he is and, in any case, I don't think that he's flat-out gay). It was just his general overall persona. I don't really think of bisexuality as being a very big deal. In some parts of the culture - parts I've lived in and parts that Kiefer has/does live in - it's hardly out of the ordinary to have acted on, whether a little or a lot, attractions to people of the same sex.
Camilia took him back to court for more support for her and the daughter in 04. She said, "He made her promises behind closed doors". Whatever that's suppose to mean. We can only guess. She didn't win unless Kiefer took care of it behind closed doors afterwards. Who knows. aKa
aKa,
I'm still not seeing the fruits of your 5 year study on the matter. LOL!
As for your speculation regarding the Iceland trip - - He spoke about going to Iceland to celebrate the holidays with Rocco on Letterman and I think in a print interview. If I recall the story they were both drowning their loneliness around the holidays in a bar and he spur of the moment says to Rocco let's go to Iceland.
I also remember that he set up a makeshift gig for Rocco to play at while there. Maybe to write off the trip as a business expense. Who knows.
The gist I did get from the story was that they both were lonely and had no one to spend the holidays with so they decided to take a fun road trip.
Which says to me that he doesn't seem to have readily available family to spend the holidays with.
His Daughter is grown up and may have her own friends to hang with or her mother. He's been separated from Kelly for awhile so going there could be awkward. I can't see why he'd spend it with Camelia except to spend time with Sarah and I'd venture to guess after the last court hearing that isn't a comfortable place to go either. So what are his options? Go home to Toronto or hang with friends.
So far it seems he chooses to hang with friends. Which doesn't prove anything imo. And using your logic - if he were involved with Rocco you'd think they would have spent time together during the holidays even if under the radar during the last several years - yet he went off heli-skiing, spent time in jail and is now 3000 miles away in NYC.
Doesn't sound much like a relationship if you ask me.
continued...
I can't see why he'd spend it with Camelia except to spend time with Sarah and I'd venture to guess after the last court hearing that isn't a comfortable place to go either. So what are his options? Go home to Toronto or hang with friends.
So far it seems he chooses to hang with friends. Which doesn't prove anything imo. And using your logic - if he were involved with Rocco you'd think they would have spent time together during the holidays even if under the radar during the last several years - yet he went off heli-skiing, spent time in jail and is now 3000 miles away in NYC.
Doesn't sound much like a relationship if you ask me.
The sad truth appears,at least to me, that he put's so much time and effort into his friends during the year that he neglects his home life.Then, when it comes to Chistmas he is left alone as his friends will spend it with their families/wives and so he is stuck for something to do..places to go.
It's all about balance, something which Kiefer appears to struggle with.There are actually many men out there like this,my father was one of them.
Ann ;)
Agree Ann.
Just my opinion but I think that despite the show at the walk of fame Kiefer feels distant from his father and half brothers otherwise he would be with them; that is certainly an option you would think. Sarah does probably spend it with her mother and again while he probably has amicable relationships with both ex-wives I hardly doubt spending holidays with them would be comfortable. Not sure why he would not spend with his mother, sister and half brother in Canada but who knows maybe this year he did. I just don't think he is as connected to his family as he lets on and from what I see at a distance something tells me he just isn't even comfortable in that family setting around the holidays cause it seems growing up that just wasn't part of his life. It was not stable or family oriented at all. Kiefer has basicially been on his own at least since 15 and that is a long time but it also may be a comfort level to him. I have felt that bars offer that comfort level too and that's why he goes as much as for the drink he goes for the commmunity and comfort.
I may as well admit that I was a Clinical Psychologist before taking early retirement and Linda you have said some fascinating words there I don't know if you realise."Community and comfort".I could talk forever about what I think but I don't want to get into any arguments here.I will say that I will be interested to see what happens when Kiefer leaves 24,I predict either he will settle down with a lady or he will become a fully fledged alcoholic.
Reading over this site and others,the big thing which strikes me is that there is a big difference between the ages of the fans which unsurprisingly has led to such a conflict.As you get older you begin to see that there is an enormous "grey area" in life and I think its important to step back and take in the whole piture when it comes to such a complex man as Kiefer.
Ann
I may as well admit that I was a Clinical Psychologist before taking early retirement and Linda you have said some fascinating words there I don't know if you realise."Community and comfort".I could talk forever about what I think but I don't want to get into any arguments here.I will say that I will be interested to see what happens when Kiefer leaves 24,I predict either he will settle down with a lady or he will become a fully fledged alcoholic.
Reading over this site and others,the big thing which strikes me is that there is a big difference between the ages of the fans which unsurprisingly has led to such a conflict.As you get older you begin to see that there is an enormous "grey area" in life and I think its important to step back and take in the whole piture when it comes to such a complex man as Kiefer.
Ann
I may as well admit that I was a Clinical Psychologist before taking early retirement and Linda you have said some fascinating words there I don't know if you realise."Community and comfort".I could talk forever about what I think but I don't want to get into any arguments here.I will say that I will be interested to see what happens when Kiefer leaves 24,I predict either he will settle down with a lady or he will become a fully fledged alcoholic.
Reading over this site and others,the big thing which strikes me is that there is a big difference between the ages of the fans which unsurprisingly has led to such a conflict.As you get older you begin to see that there is an enormous "grey area" in life and I think its important to step back and take in the whole piture when it comes to such a complex man as Kiefer.
Ann
I can't recall if it was Louise or Christy further up the page but one of you said he craves to be accepted by men. Well I believe you are onto something. I don't believe he has a complicated relationship with women, I think it is men he struggles with. His fathers abscense in his younger years appears to have affected him in his adult life which could explain why he seeks out men (not for a sexual purpose,I really don't think he is gay)but to be included and to be like all the rest.
Kiefer had his sister and mother to influence his early life and he certainly seems to be comfortable around ladies.
Kiefer is searching for something that is missing from his life but it goes deeper than an affair with the young man he is helping in that band.
These are my views of course, but to me it appears psychological. Kiefer has demons from his past which are affecting his adult life.In brief he is unsure of men and his place in their world.
Ann
Ann Continued..
Sorry folks if I'm rambling but I had no idea how long this thread was. Louise said that he runs out of steam and seemingly gets bored half way down the line.This is possible if he is searching for a long term relationship with a woman who has some depth.I can tell by the answers above there is some intelligent women here who I'm sure have many aspects to their personalities.But, we are normal people, in the sense that we do not live in the Hollywood bubble of fakeness.These women there are completely different to you or I.They are narcissitic to the point of obsessiveness.What we have seen from Kiefer,(from afar)is that he is trying to be a normal guy in an abnormal world.The women he will meet will be aware of who he is, how much money he has.He will be awre of that and it must be hard for him to find genuine love in that world.I know he has chosen that life but that is my "take"
Ann
Ann - glad some one with more rational thinking is posting here - after all this really ridiculous theorys...
Thanks for that!
Exactly Ann,
It's my belief that Joel Schumacher early on in Kiefer's career and even still today has provided a father figure and to some degree unconditional love and friendship that you'd normally get from a natural father. It was great to see both 'fathers' at the Walk of Fame for this reason.
Though I still see Joel as being more sincere in his pda of Kiefer than Donald. It just doesn't seem something that Donald is comfortable expressing. Luckily Kiefer had no such reservations and continually reached out to his dad and happily his efforts were rewarded.
I also believe that his drinking and going to bars has a lot to do with wanting to feel connected and to loosen up and be more open. To be less self conscious if you will. Plus he's said on many occasions that drinking helps him forget and not worry about tomorrow. Which plays into what he's also said -- that having too much free time on his hands gets him in trouble.
So I too worry a little about what will happen after 24 is done. Hopefully his move to NYC will open up a new community for him to take the place of the one he's had in L.A.
Don't see this happen ("his move to NYC will open up a new community for him to take the place of the one he's had in L.A.") by sticking his nose into the fashionista's world.... OR it takes EXACTLY this place - with all the BAD things there! Fashionistas - Hollywood people - where's the difference?
D2 Kiefer never said he went with Rocco to Iceland,he only talked about the fireworks display on the Letterman show at that time.After Kiefer did the doc they went back to Iceland on tour to promote Rocco 1st Cd and the doc together with the band to do the gig you are speaking of, it was not in 03 during the break of 24. His daughter was only 16 when he went with Rocco in Dec 03. It was in 04 that Camelia took him back to court for more money. If you knew Kiefer he would never ever make anything awkward or hurtful for his daughter. During his breaks and hers he could have taken her somewhere, it didn't mean he had to spend them in the same room with Camelia & the same with his step children. He had alot of opinions to take his children for a few days. After all he was paying alot in support to his wives.Kiefer is not 3000 miles away from Rocco. Did you forget he has a job in LA called 24 which he did all summer 5-6 days a week. He only goes to NYC on some weekends or to promote something.
I don't know what his relationship was or is now with Kelly but in my opinion it was a marriage of conveniences after they separated. She & Kiefer are very good friends and she is the one who gave Kiefer the steady home life he wanted. I believe he was welcome there at anytime. She is the one who helped with the family pic of Kiefer and his children for Fathers Day. She is also the one helping him sell IWs because she is a realtor. You have alot of "maybe-s" in your story the same as all of us.
John English is a long story to tell but I will when I get more time. aka
Such interesting analysis and so thought out, Ann. Thank you.
Your take on Kiefer trying to be normal in a very fake place is so straight on for me. Unfortunately Kiefer seemingly gavitates to the fake and empty women of these worlds - hollywood and fashion and until he looks elsewhere I don't think he will find true happiness for himself. No matter what, the people and specifically the women of hollywood and fashion are obsessed with their looks, their bodies and the latest designer clothes, oh and money. While that might seem glamorous at a glance it is a very shallow selfish place. It is not the real world.
I hope Kiefer finds a way to go out of the box and find a geniune love cause otherwise I do think he will end up as you say. 24 will not go on forever.
Trading a L.A. Music studio loft living arrangement and all that goes with it for a quiet brownstone home in the Village seems like a pretty significant difference to me.
He'll likely always be surrounded by some form of 'fake' people it the nature of the business he's in. But it doesn't mean that there isn't a BIG difference between how he's been living in LA and what NYC offers.
And I'm just not seeing all this Fashionista stuff. He's gone to what? One or two gallery openings. A very NYC thing to do. Has he even attended one runway event or fashion week party that we know of?
He's still his own man and will make decisions based on who and what he's wants to be involved with. If that includes people in the fashion industry so what.
He'll still likely wear those beat up boots and scarfs :D
Ann.. You have some great points but Kiefer didn,t just spend time with his Mother and sister. He has a older step brother Tom who was raised with him and who Kiefer looked up to especially when it came to music. He wanted to copy everything his 1/2 brother did which is normal. Kiefer speaks about him alot.
He also had a famous grandfather who he spent his summers with Tommy Douglas and I'm sure Kiefer loved and admired. Kiefer also spent time on his fathers farm in Ottawa. So Kiefer did not grow up around just women.
What stimulates Kiefer is his mind. He gets that through music. Music moves Kiefer mind, his emotions and he is an emotional person. He finds Rocco fascinating. If you listen to Rocco's music he is speaking to Kiefer. Rocco's music is for Kiefer. You need to believe in their relationship to understand. I know because I didn't want to believe it at first either. I love Kiefers mind he is very brilliant.aka
Ann you have alot of good points but Kiefer didn't just spend time with his mother and sister. He has a older step brother Tom who he looked up to especially when it came to music. He copied everything his 1/2 brother did. He also had a famous grandfather who he spent his summers with, who he admired and loved. He also spent his time on his fathers farm in Ottawa. Kiefer also mentioned his father taking him to baseball games and he loved and got excited when the fans talked to his dad.
What I think that stimulates Kiefer the most is a person mind. This is why he is so much into music. It just totally moves him. He is emotional person. I believe alot of Rocco's songs, music were written with Kiefer in mind. I love Kiefer's mind he is brilliant and can be decieving. In public he is acting out a role and as he does in 24 and we all know Kiefer isn't a Jack Bauer.
Hello Ladies,
I'm uncertain as to why anyone would try to spend five years analysing whether or not Kiefer is gay, have I missed something?In my opinion Aka, and I can see why you have come to this conclusion,but I feel you are wrong.Kiefer admires Rocco and his talent for sure but that doesn't mean he is gay. From where I sit I see he has tried to help Rocco as much as he can because he knows with help this band can be really special.If he was a jealous person he could resent Rocco for having the talents he wishes he had in music but he doesn't,he supports him which is a compliment to his character.I don't need to believe in anything.One of the ladies asked if you were a gay man up the page.It would be an explanation?
Rocco could be speaking to anyone with his music,much of which has angry notes to it.I'm listening Aka but your posts don't seem rational.
In regard to his half brother and grandfather,yes he had male figures on the outer perimeter but I'm talking about close family,a father figure when he was young.He left home at 15 so clearly he wasn't happy.Kiefer aside for a moment, why are you so hung up about this singer that you think is gay.I have just had a look at some photograph's and I see nothing at all which makes me think Rocco is gay.He is probably in complete gratitude that someone has believed in his music but I think it's unfair to label the pair gay just becase they are such good friends.Just to make sure none of you think I'm prejudice against gay men, I'm not, I know many gay men but the point is this kind of labelling can cause many problems for people.I'm sure some of us here would not be happy if we were unjustifiably labelled as lesbians.This shows how we all think differently as my thoughts would have been that Kiefer is focusing on Rocco as an escapism from his demons.He has thrown himself into this band but I can't believe that its for the reasons you are thinking.
Ann
Aka,
I have a lot of maybes because I, as you, don't know him or anything as fact just as you have a lot of could of's and would of's. The difference imo is that you seem intent on making your case by spinning some isolated tidbit rather than presenting the whole picture. Imo any isolated fact can be twisted into meaning anything - including something that is completely off base.
While I'm not a timeline detail person I'm still pretty sure that he did mention in a story somewhere how he and Rocco ended up in Iceland that first time and it included drinking in a bar and being alone with nothing to do over the holidays. Perhaps one of the more Kiefer savy posters here will have access to the source.
As for where he's spending his time - yes when he's working on 24 he's in L.A. but as soon as he has time off and doesn't have any local commitments he's off to NYC. It's far more often than a few weekends here and there. But besides that - if you are right why would he leave town when he actually has free time available to spend quality time with his special 'friend'?
Instead he flies 3000 miles away.
It just doesn't add up.
ann (again) cont..
Labelling can cause many problems for people.Perhaps he focuses on Rocco and the music industry as an escapism from a life he clearly is unhappy with.As you say he enjoys music, which is great but it's obviou to me that he is far from content which saddens me.I watched the documentary again as I had only watched it in passing but I see nothing that you see.Maybe if you gave more details I would understand alittle more?
Best day to you all.
ann (again) cont..
Labelling can cause many problems for people.Perhaps he focuses on Rocco and the music industry as an escapism from a life he clearly is unhappy with.As you say he enjoys music, which is great but it's obviou to me that he is far from content which saddens me.I watched the documentary again as I had only watched it in passing but I see nothing that you see.Maybe if you gave more details I would understand alittle more?
Best day to you all.
D2, thank you for bringing up the 2 "dads" at the walk of fame. I don't know if anyone saw it as I did but when watching the additional clips I noticed how Joel gave Kiefer a tight embrace and a kiss or two on the cheek; he was completely emotional in that situation with Kiefer. I felt on the other hand that Donald gave him a quick hug and no kiss. I felt he just did it in a way cause he had to because it just felt more awkward to me. I just don't believe, while their relationship is better, that it is now or will be all the way there. I think just as aka states Kiefer is a very emotional feeling person and I think Donald is a cold fish. I also can't help but think that Kiefer might feel left out of that family as Donald was sure to involve himself in the other boys lives while basically ignoring Kiefer.
Well, timely to this discussion pictures have emerged of Kiefer looking like an adorable tourist in Paris on New Year's Eve!! The blogger doesn't mention Siobhan so she could be there or it's possible that he spent it with Donald (after my rant, of course, LOL) or he went there as is his usual pattern to escape and find some comfort. Who knows for sure maybe more details will emerge.
Linda,
I saw similarly to what you note. Joel is a much more emotional being. Much like Kiefer. And Joel gives Kiefer what he needs in that regard.
Donald does not come across as a touchy feely guy to me and seems to have to be pulled into being open. His post speech embrace with Kiefer at the Walk of Fame event was short and then he looks quickly over toward the cameras as he pulls away - as if caught in an embarrassing moment. Yet Kiefer holds on to him and pulls him back to him and the moment and only then do they seem to share a more intimate and personal connection.
It was very different to watch the level of intimacy between him and the two 'dads' though both made me smile. It does seem like he and Donald have come a long over the last year or so. Which as a fan is really nice to see.
That day, imo, really seemed to relieve some of the hurt he seems to carry - there were times during the family photos where his enthusiasm was very child-like. It definitely made me smile. :)
Linda, I agree about Donald, If you watch the footage that was on Benny's done in slowed down motion, when donald hugs Kiefer and the pulls away, Kiefer looks at him like he is so in love with him, (in a fatherly way ), and pulls him back in for another hug, Donald looks like he could care less. I felt so bad for him when I saw that, and I realy only noticed it on Bennys when she put together that footage. Anyway, I think Kiefer is a total outside when it comes to family, I don't care what he says, but I would never admit that either. Ann, I like your views, keep them up, cause we are all fascinated by this man named Kiefer. Linda hope you had a great New Year.
Pam
All of this talk about Kiefer being unhappy has made me a little sad, so is that the reason that I think in the new pic form Paris he looks a little sad, or maybe just tired. I don't know
12:42, i don't think he was alone in Paris, Siobhan was certainly with him.
She lives with him and i think they spent the end of 2008 together.
She lives with him and had to ask for the keys for their apartment to get her cell phone?????
D2...The alone time with nothing to do over the holidays was with Catherine in 06.
Kiefer did spend from May until Dec in La. They starting working on 24 in May went to Africa in June. Then they worked all summer when Kiefer stayed in Malibu, from that point on it was LA until Dec when it wrapped up. In my opinion Kiefer had no free time this summer with promoting Mirror, 24 etc. most of his trips to NY were work related. He is in NY again promoting 24. On the Letterman show he usually tells us what he did over his 24 time off.
His quiet brownstone house in NYC is rented out. I beleive he has a new hide out in Malibu and Canyon Lake, CA.
We don't know what Kiefers future plans are. Maybe next year 24 will take place in NYC. There was talk about it.
We see Kiefer in Paris alone and automtically he is with Sib and they are living together???WTF?
I wonder if he still sees Catherine as a friend ? i'm very curious... I would like to know if she has found the right man now ? Strange after several years together (on and off), she has completely disappeared...
I don't agree with you about Donald. Do you know if you look at the clip again, Donald actually leans against the wall so he wouldn't look so tall, against Kiefers height. He could have stood to his full height if he didn't care for Kiefer. Maybe he didn't want to look at Kiefer because he was afraid he would start to cry, I seen Donald get emotional. Thats what I got from it. Kiefer also said he was seeing his dad at the beach on weekends. When Kiefer was in jail, the one person he spoke to was his father about how cold it was in the cell. Donald loves Kiefer like his other sons but Kiefer in my opinion sometimes can be distant and uncaring. I believe Kiefer spent alot of time in LA this year because of his father working there on Dirty Money, which I heard wasn't going to be renewed.
1:20, do you really see Kiefer with his camera walking alone in Paris ? lol.
Catherine has her own website with her Artwork on it. Its great stuff if you haven't ever seen it before. A lot of her artwork is in IronWorks Studio that she did for Kiefer. I also believe she taught & helped Kiefer with his projects for Gibson guitars and the CD cover he did for Rock something or another I can't remember the CD but very dark stuff. aKa
1:01 PM, don't know if the West Village Brownstown is rented out; construction going on there now so can't imagine anyone living in it. Also, just my opinion but I believe Kiefer will turn it from a condo style building back to a house and that will be his residence for most of the time while not working on LA set locations like 24. I don't think he would invest $8mm in it plus all the costly rennovations not to use it. I am with D2 that he likes the city life. He can go out and not drive, he can go to art galleries, museums, etc. The West Village is a community type situation which is what I stated earlier I believe personally that Kiefer craves. I think LA will be the place he works but not permanent. Also, over the last few months whatever time away from 24 he had he seemed to be in NYC. That is just my take.
12:50 PM, yep it's possible about Siobhan but unless any of us know either of them personally we don't know any of that for sure and in the case of Paris, the bloggers didn't mention he was with a lady at least at the point they met him. Most times people mention that sort of thing but again who knows for sure.
thanks Aka for this info.
Thanks Aka, and yes, that cover for 99X, if that is the one you are referencing was very dark. I wondered if that darkened figure with no arms was supposed to be Kiefer. It kind of scared me in a way.
In his last Regis and Kelly interview he talks about living in NYC for three years now. His bio on the FOX site now shows that his splits his time between LA and NYC. He has in addition to the Brownstone that he's finishing the construction on another apartment. Where if I remember another post from another site right Siobhan has listed as her address now. So she's living there too. He was caught coming out of this same building on Monday this week and getting into a towncar to go to do press.
So I'm really not getting he doesn't live there part.
2:29 PM, I don't know about any construction on the condo/apartment he's had for the past few years but maybe there is. That is the apartment he was coming out of, he is not living in the brownstone, that is where the construction is going on for sure. Again, maybe you know more about the apartment. I believe the apartment is where Siobhan was also listed as living but again we don't know anything concrete there.
2:29pm, you don't get the 'not living there part' because it's crystal clear that, at least part of the time (and lately most of the time when he's not working on 24), he *does* live there. There's all kinds of publicly available evidence to attest to that. ;)
aKa, Kiefer and Rocco first went to Iceland right after Christmas in 2004. As D2 (and probably others; I just skimmed all the recent entries so could've missed stuff) said, he *did* talk about going with Rocco - and why they went (hanging around together with nowhere to go post Christmas, etc) - in interviews just after the fact. Whatever did/didn't go on with them overall (I do think it was a very intense relationship - of whatever kind(s) - for awhile), I think it's pretty evident that that period passed quite some time ago.
This is a hit & run post (too busy to read everything everyone's written carefully right now), but just have to add - lordy, does he ever look delicious in the Paris pic!!! The scruff just makes him so SO cuddly-looking to me... even moreso than usual... which is saying something!!! :D
2:29 PM, I think I may have misread your post. I thought you were stating that construction was going on with the apartment. Sorry, my eyes are tired, LOL
So far as I know, based on publicly available information...
The brownstone is the place that Kiefer recently (August, I believe?) bought on Greenwich St. That's the place that's being renovated. There was a real estate listing for one floor (iirc, it's 4 floors total) being available for rent for a couple of months, but I believe that those couple of months now have passed now.
His other place in NYC is the place on W. 10th. That's the place that 411.com shows as being Siobhan's address too (whether or not that means she's currently living there, who knows) and that would've been the place that he dashed out of to the waiting town car yesterday morning on his way to the Regis & Kelly taping.
2:44pm My bad that I didn't use commas in my 2:29pm post. Because what you wrote was what I meant. There is construction going on at the Brownstone. And he's living and came out of the apartment. And Siobhan lists it as her current address per another site.
And yep Christy, whatever the intense relationship was its long past and have to agree that the Paris photo is YUMMY!
Heh - romantic city, romantic man, New Years Eve. Hmmmmmm.... ;)
Also love that he's back interested to taking photos. I hope he publishes some of them on his my space page. The ones he took in South Africa were really powerful and beautiful.
D2, LOL, I made a sort of joke saying that I was crossing my fingers for the photos but you just mentioned the MySpace so maybe we will see some. I could see Kiefer sharing his photos. One thing Kiefer seems to like is sharing his work, loves e.g., music, etc. and things like that which is lovely for us fans.
Btw, how would you like to have him as your personal tour guide. LOL, I'd pay big bucks for that if I had them. Heck, even if I didn't, I would just break the bank, LOL!!
Is D2 Christy...Dillon 2, its kind of confusing because they write the same.
No, D2 isn't Dillon. I'm "Dillon" on the Krew and on Benny's (and "annabella" on FOX), but I post here only as "Christy".
D2 and I have similar (though not 100% matching) points of view on many things and have a somewhat similar writing style, but not a precisely-the-same writing style. :)
There was at least one instance that I wished I was Christy for the day! I'm still slightly jealous that she got to nuzzle the golden ones neck. *sigh*
And while we do seem to share very similar points of view she's right we aren't always 100% in agreement. But on this point we seem to be on the same general wave length - but then again reason, logic and a fairly good grasp of publicly available information may also have a lot to do with it.
To me it's the multiple anonymous/aKa poster(s) that are the confusing ones. But perhaps that's just me. :D
Linda,
I'd very much like to have him show me around Paris or anywhere for that matter. That would be very kool Hell, I'd even be willing to sit through an evening of him showing me his vacation photos LOL! ;)
It would seem Rocco was on break from his gigs for the holidays Dec 18th-Jan 5th at the same time as Kiefer. They have been to Paris together before. Heh-romantic city, romantic man, New Years Eve. Hmmmmmm....Just got me to thinking!
aKa
I've had serious computer problems so I have just been able to look over posts now properly. I'm really lucky in that I know Paris pretty well but Damn I could have amnesia for a day and let Kiefer show me around!He looks Gorgeous in this pic, I love the stubble! lol!
Christy got to nuzzle his neck?When?I'm jealous as hell! lol
aka, well, we really don't know who he was with unless maybe that couple can give us a clue, LOL. But that is interesting about Rocco.
Gosh - "aka" - you're really obsessed with this "Rocco-thing"! You've never met Kiefer or Rocco, right? Well, I have - multiple times and believe me - none of them is gay, not even bi - not a little bit!
Thankyou-6.56AM.
Do you know them well enough to say that for sure?If you do then I sure am glad someone is putting a stop to this gay nonsense once and for all!
So do we know if he was alone in Paris or with a certain lady friend of his?
I guess we could email the blogger to find out?
BTW - Rocco and Kiefer haven't been together before in Paris - where do you get all this crap??
7:11 Yes - at least I know Kiefer well enough to say this for sure! Kiefer isn't gay, not bi, that's just very crazy speculations of some people here!!
Thankyou again 7.16!
Things are getting crazy here..
I'm sure Kiefer would have a great laugh at some of the stupid theories posted on this thread! I wonder if you know the situation with Siobhan?But let me guess you can't/won't say?Or do you not know??
Thankyou again 7.16AM.
I guess if you had any info about his relationship with Siobhan you wouldn't share that??It would be awesome to have that all cleared up!
Sorry - I haven't spoken to him for a year and a half now, so I can't (and of course also wouldn't) say s.th. about this.. That's up to him!
I just couldn't stand anymore this completely false rumors about Kiefer being gay... That's not funny anymore!
Sorry, i don't think Kiefer is gay or bi, but 7:55, strange, if you know Kiefer, that you have not seen him for a year and a half, that is to say since he is almost with Siobhan. Who are you ?
SORRY FOR MY ENGLISH.
WEll I know him also, very well in fact. I live in LA , I have done some work on 24, I am in the medical field and they always have someone there on set for emergencies. We have become friends. I do know all about Siobhan and what their relationship is. And if you guys believe that I have a bridge to sell you. Ha Ha. I know him probably just as well as 7:55 knows him, which isn't at all, cuase I don't believe that anyone who knows Kiefer would even comment on this board, and if you do know him, then I guess it is a good thing you havn't spoken to him on over a year, Cuase I don't think he would like it very much that you even commented on knowing him.
Kiefer and Rocco use to go away during that time period but they haven't done that in 2 years.
7:55 How do you know of Kiefer and what info do you have if you do know him? I think you are just one pissed off fan! The person said he "might" be gay everyone has a right to his or her opinion on this site. It was just a open minded discussion, like when they were speaking of Kiefer being an alcoholic. I got upset over it. I'm okay with it now.
Its not a big deal to me anymore who Kiefer is. Its none of my business and I don't know him on a personal level to real know if he is an alcoholic, gay or who he really is dating. I have recently just learned a lot of interesting things about him that I never knew before, whether true or not I have no clue. All this PR stuff is crazy in my opinion but I don't know and I guess I lost interest in every bodies to "many" opinions. Every ones opinion is misleading to me.
I'm sticking to something I'm sure of which is...He is a great actor and I love 24. I'm so excited that it is finally coming. I think it will be the best season ever! Kalin
9:28, I love your post because that is exactly what I would say. Anyone who knows Kiefer well is not going to be posting anyting on a fan site. Sorry, not buying that for a minute, LOL
i don't need to know Kiefer to see how his relationship with Siobhan is serious .
People who say here that he's not dating her don't want to see the truth.
Now,9:28, if Kiefer is one of your friends, what are you doing here too ? lol ! he would not like to know that...LOL.
Is it a joke ? or perhaps you think we are so stupid to believe you !!??
10;13 it si a joke, that is why I said I have a bridge to sell you, Of coarse I don't know Kiefer, never even met him. I did see him once, but that is it. And I really dont care one way or another about his relationship with Sib, it he is hapy with her great if they are friends great if they are all PR great. I just couldn't resist the sarcasm. And you are right Kiefer's friend shouldn't and wouldn't be here at all.
Hey, Louise... yeah, I did indeed nuzzle the golden neck briefly several years ago while attempting to pose for a photo for a malfunctioning camera. I'm grateful to the camera for malfunctioning because it extended my body-to-body contact moment more than it would have if the camera had worked! ;)
He was kind and patient and absolutely beautiful, his stubble was silky, his neck was warm and soft, and he smelled great!
Very nice moment/memory! :D
It is not the people 10:13 on this site that are afraid of the truth. The point of this thread is no one real knows the truth about Kiefer and his girlfriend if that is what she is or his other problems. Kiefer is the one who never spoke the truth about it to anyone. Did he whisper the truth into your ear? The fans here are looking for that answer. If Kiefer would just stop fooling around with his immature responses and stop dodging the truth the fans would be very happy for him....Kiefer is the one who is causing this storm or ripple among his fans but I guess it is not any of are business, he wants us to watch 24 and I would image he doesn't want us involved in his personal life. You either like it or you don't and if you don't I guess he doesn't really care what you think.I'm not sure if that makes sense but I gave it my best shot..Kalin
Kalin, I agree with pretty much everything you said there. Except... if you say that you believe that Kiefer doesn't want us to know all about his personal life (I agree!), I'm curious as to why you find his responses to questions about his personal life to be immature or truth-dodging. I mean, even if they're the latter, if we agree that he has a right to protect his personal life to whatever degree he wants to protect it, is it really 'immature' of him to do so? :)
Kalin, what do you want to know about Kiefer and Siobhan in fact ? You admit she is his girlfriend ! So what ? do you think Kiefer should give an interview to the press to talk about his girlfriend's life TO EXPLAIN WHO SHE IS? What's truth are you looking for? so now, i can tell you he will never do that because he doesn't really care what you think or if you approve their relationship. I find you very hypocrite, you are interested like all the people who come here (otherwise you would not be here) by his personal life and suddenly, you tell one person who gives her/his opinion that Kiefer doesn't care what she/he thinks. How old are you ? don't be so puerile...
Everybody here likes 24. Viva season 7 !
We're all interested! And we all love 24 and are yeah! for season 7 but......we are also interested in his private life and the song and dance that has been happening with this skinny assed Siobhan is unbelievable!
Really, I hope that Siobhan and Kiefer are not in relationship,What a mock up of a relatonship he or she has made it look!
If it wasn't for his fans he wouldn't be acting....Period
Christy, damn you girl, Wish that had been me lol :)
Shame about the camera too, body to body contact lol what a shame it stalled hey??? Louise
i don't like Siobhan but i don't really believe they are just friends...
Nah, I'm actually totally fine with the fact that it didn't work because it really did mean getting way more time than I would've had if it'd worked - "pose, snap, done!" :D Plus, he was so sweet about waiting while my friend kept trying to snap it and then said, "Why don't you guys try to get that figured out and I'll come back..." (because there were lots of other people clammoring for photos) and then he sweetly did come back and try again. So, in the end, I'm happier with the memory than I probably would've been with the photo! (Since I like photos of myself about as much as most people do... ;))
1:52, what you (and those who feel as you do) don't seem to understand is that, if Kiefer and Siobhan have a relationship (and I don't know whether or not they do), *they* know what it is... and what you or anyone else thinks about it doesn't change what *they* know about.
Heck, that's true for ANY of us and our relationships, whether we're famous or not. :)
... and, yes, Kiefer has a career because he has fans. However, MOST of those people who are fans of his work and/or persona aren't interested at all (or care very little) about his personal life.
Still others (but, by percentage, a small number) are *very* interested in following his comings and goings but feel absolutely no sense of him "owing" them any explanations about any aspect of his life beyond whatever he wants to offer. I count myself in that group.
All stars like Kiefer owe their success and wealth to the fans. Certainly Kiefer's career success and of course life have been turned around due to the very loyal support of the fans following 24. Without it there is a very good chance he would not have regular work and maybe no work at all, IMHO. What I think he "owes" the fans is his respect and gratitude. I think he "owes" it to his fans not to knowingly try to deceive them as if they are lemmings. I think some of that deceipt which I refer to has gone on here with him. Once again, I don't expect all the details but I also don't respect the attitude by him or any other famous person of "it's none of their darn business" or "I don't care what they think"; not saying that is Kiefer's thinking but it may come into play. That, IMHO, is disrespectful. That is just my opinion and maybe everyone else disagrees which is fine but that's how I feel about it.
Kiefer is not Brad Pitt followed by hordes of paparazzi or hounded by the press day and night. He is followed by a handful of paparazzi and fans, if even that. There is no need for all the PR and nonsense that I have seen playing out by him from the Pastis and Waverly Inn parades with Siobhan to the "look at me" beach pictures. Whatever the instances he had no problem whatsoever using the paparazzi or press, etc. to get his message out. Btw, this also plays out in his sweetheart deal with Extra. It's a two-way street as I see it. Give and Take and to me it's been all take from Kiefer, just my take!!
What do you feel that he's "taken" from you and/or fans in general, Anna?
well technically he has taken out time and money. I can see Anna's point to some extent and yes he does have a sweetheart deal with Extra, I just really don't know, I am very conflicted. I think that celebs do owe us something cause basically we do pay their salary and without us they would be nothing. they see m to want to be photographed when out and about, but only when it benefits them. If the average Joe Blow were to do that ,he would be considered selfish and in it for himself. but on the other hand I do think that they deserve some privacy. I guess what it really comes down to is simple. I really hate the Hollywood machine and basically I don't like celebs cause they think they are about it all, Unfortunately Kiefer because he is a celeb get lumped into this cataegory and even though from what I understand he is very sweet and cordial, He is stiall a celeb and still acts the part. I don't know if any of that made sense but anyway, that is how I feel, I think.. Oh hell, now I am really confused. lol
4:37, you've spent your time watching his performances (on 24 and in movies) and your money paying for his performances (assuming you go to movies, buy dvds, etc), right?
Do you feel that he's given his time and his talent (that is, his work product) to those performances?
Lol,lol, Christy! You even managed to get on KIEFER's nerves with your camera, so he preferred to go away! ROTFL!
Part of being a celebrity, to me anyway,means inevitably people/press are going to become interested in your life.Christy is right in she says that he gives us his performance and thats what he is there for and so technically he doesn't owe us anything else.
But I think what Anna means is that because this whole Siobhan episode has been such a charade it appears to the outside world he is trying to decieve.He will see things differently of course, and probably just thinks "well,it's not serious,so nothing to report" thats just an example but its a possibility in my opinion anyway.
Why Kiefer has chosen to act this way with this woman is confusing to me as most of you here.Why the performance at Waverly and Pastis? I'm not convinced even he knows himself and think he is confused and mixed up after the stint in Jail.Kiefer seems vulnerable to me this past year and from what I have seen has tried with this woman and almost forced himself into a normal life of what people think/want him to do but it just hasn't worked :(
If,and I don't know her,but if it is true what has been said about Siobhan then perhaps she is in the driving seat and he is going along with things for now?I see they are together in the OK! Magazine?
It will be interesting to see what happens from here on.Best day to you all here.
Is it a possibility we are looking for answers to questions which he doesn't even know himself?Could that be the reason for all the cryptic answers/behaviour?
Ann
And perhaps it's simply not a charade.
Why in the world would he continue it at this point if it weren't real. He could just as easily move on to someone else or no one at this stage of the game. Yet he doesn't.
It seems there are some that just don't want him with her and will do and say anything to convince themselves and others that he's the messed up. When it's those that can't accept that he's with her for real that are the messed up ones.
Seriously all this puppet master stuff has gotten ridiculous.
12.19-
I said I have no idea who this woman is personally but I did read him say he was single.
What are your thoughts on the matter?My other idea was that he was in love with her but was desperate to keep her out of the public eye, like many here I don't know enough about either of them to comment on a possible relationship so I can only speculate.
Ann
12.19-
Like many here, I'm only able to speculate from afar. What are your opinions on the matter?Another idea I had was Kiefer loves this person and is desperate to keep her out of the public eye. I for one do not think she is a bad person but again I don't have enough information.
I read somewhere that he said he was currently single and enjoying life so I can see where the confusion has come from.
Ann
YOU PEOPLE-GAY,STRAIGHT,BI-WHATEVER YOU ARE,YOU ARE JUST PLAIN STUPID IF YOU BELIEVE KIEFER SUTHERLAND IS SINGLE!
KIEFER HAS BEEN DATING SIOBHAN BONNOUVRIER FOR A YEAR AND ITS LOVE.SHE LEFT HER HUSBAND FOR HIM!HE CLEARLY JUST DOESN'T WANT THE WORLD STICKING THERE NOSES IN TO HIS AFFAIRS.THE REASON YOU ARE ALL SO "PANICKY" IS THAT YOU KNOW IN YOUR HEARTS THIS IS SERIOUS AND DON'T WANT TO ADMIT IT.HE BEHAVES SO DIFFERENTLY AROUND HER BECAUSE HE LOVES HER GUYS! CAN'T YOU SEE THAT?
SO GET OVER IT AND YES BEFORE ANY OF YOU SAY ANYTHING I DO KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT WITH THIS SHIT.
THEY LIVE TOGETHER FOR CHRISSSAKES!SIOBHAN & KIEFER GOT TOGETHER LAST YEAR WHEN SHE WAS STILL MARRIED AND SHE LEFT HER HUSBAND FOR HIM.THEY HAVE TRAVELLED ALL OVER THE WORLD AND SHE WANTS KIDS OK?THANKGOD THATS OFF MY CHEST I'M SICK OF HEARING ABOUT IT NOW.
OH YES FYI SHE IS A BITCH.
MOVE ON YOU PEOPLE!
And you know all this how 4:09am???
I am in the middle of the road on all this. I'm not delusional enough to think they are just friends, but I am also not convinced this is more than just 2 people dating on and off for the past year. IMHO, if he truly loved her, at some point this privacy issue would have become a moot point. There wouldn't be all this "arrangement" nonsense. He would just love her naturally and you would see it in the way he treats her. (and no, I don't mean PDA) She seems to be willing to be available for him whennever he wishes, so why on earth would he want to get rid of her?
Jesus wept! does anyone else think this is all getting alittle crazy/mad/barmy now?
And Christy yeah I know thats what you meant I was being alittle tongue in cheek with that remark lol. Lucky you though.
I just hope in the TV interviews that he is asked whether he is seeing anyone.That will hopefully put a stop on all of this.
Ann,
Sorry if I misunderstood your post earlier and lumped it in with the other head in the sand posts on this site.
The words charade, performance and confused led me to believe that you were buying into the fantasy that they can't possibly be together unless he is crazy. Meaning it read to me that if only he would wake up and dump her then all would be right with the world again.
Which seems to the ultimate goal for some fans.
9:15, what you said.
The whole idea that they can't have a "real" relationship (whether they do or don't - personally, I believe that they do but, no, I can't say that I "know" that beyond a shadow of a doubt myself) because of what we've seen of their relationship publicly is just outright incomprehensible to me.
I just don't get why the idea that he could have been perfectly willing to "go public" with the relationship for PR purposes (and, also, maybe just plain to "go public with the relationship") back in the spring, but otherwise not want to make it public/talk about it is so difficult to understand.
Do I wish that he'd sit down and tell us every little detail of his life? Sure! He fascinates me. :) Do I have an iota of belief that he *owes* me/us that information? God, no.
In the same interview where he said he's single and enjoying his life (or whatever the exact words were), he said that he's learned his lesson about talking about his love life. Those who are so hung up on the first part of that really seem to have forgotten the second part of it.
Also, the idea that he's causing a big tempest with his "deceit" is just plain incorrect. There are a handful of people (even among his dedicated fans) who are upset about not knowing the details one way or another. It's not a tempest in a teapot... or even a teacup. It's a tempest in a half-full thimble.
anonymous from 4:09, Everybody here knows she has left David for Kiefer but if she wants kids from him, good luck to her ! i don't see Kiefer with another chid. Sorry, who is a bitch ? I'm not english and i don't understand what you mean...when you say : "oh yes FYI"
However i think it's serious between them and to wish them to break is not so kind...If they are very in love this would never happened, and some fans will be very disappointed.
You will get your MONTHLY installment of them together.
Then you will get your MONTHLY installment of Kiefer drunk.
...ARE YOU BORED YET?...
Frankly I do find it odd that he would specifically want to go public with it for PR purposes, but then turn around and say he wants to keep his lovelife private. That is definitely a contradiction. Now maybe he regretted the intial coming out party for her, but it's pretty hard to put the genie back in the bottle after the fact. And as for his comment about not wanting to talk about his relationships, I just wonder how long this practice will continue. As some folks here have been quick to point out, it has been over a year now that they have been seeing one another in some capacity, so just how long does this relationship have to stay in relative secrecy, other than the times when he wants to remind people he has a girlfriend ...but of course not take her anywhere too important which might make people think they are serious about each other ...which of course we are to believe they are and he just doesn't want us to know.
Dear God!!!! I wonder if he can even remember on any given day what he really feels.
1:37pm - I'd say that, whatever people think about whether or not there's a relationship between Kiefer & Siobhan or whatever they think about anything else related to Kiefer, if they were bored with the subject(s), they wouldn't be here. :)
If *you're* bored, though, lucky for you that you you're not being forced to follow the conversation(s), huh?!
1:50pm - you assume that you know what's important to him/her/them or that there's any "rule" or timetable for how long he/she/they can do exactly what they've been doing. There isn't. They can do whatever they want for as long as they want.
You say that making the relationship public in terms of being photographed together but not otherwise talking about it is contradictory... but, actually, the deal is that is seems contradictory *to you* (and a handful of others). That doesn't mean that it's contradictory to his/"his people's" wishes re: balancing his public persona with his private life. His goals (and, if she is a regular part of his life... and even if she's just a casual part of his life... her goals) aren't known to you or me or anyone else "on the outside."
I think that you (and others) are getting mixed up between *you* not knowing how he feels from day to day (because... you don't! neither do I. :)) and *him* not knowing how he feels from day to day. Just because we don't know the whole story doesn't mean that he doesn't, she doesn't, and the people who actually are privy to details about their privates lives don't.
When he was with Catherine, he never talks publicly about her, why he would do that with Siobhan ? I think he wants to protect this relationship from media, so that's why he will not tell anything and we can't blame him.
I'm going to try to stay calm Christy and not say something I might regret later. First of all, I NEVER even insinuated that he or Siobhan shouldn't do whatever they damn well please. IOm was stating my opinion here just like everyone else and don't really appreciate your 3 paragraph response to me, basically telling me I don't know what I'm talking about. For the record, I am the anonymous who has believed all along that there is some realtionship going on here, just not the serious one some have alluded to. I'm not "mixing up" anything. I have no idea where you live, but if this is the way men and women conduct relationships there, then I'm happy to be fat, dumb and happy where I am. And finally, if Kiefer follows this line of thinking to all his relationships with women, it's no wonder he has failed miserably.
1:37 PM, I don't know if you are the lady that was posting that awhile ago on these boards but you are earily accurate on that. We do seem to get a picture set once a month and usually around the same time. At least that has been the pattern since September. I started to wonder about it in December and then we got those "staged" San Diego pics and yes, I think they were staged. Paparazzi are not just hanging out at some Denny's on a highway between LA and San Diego. Also, Kiefer didn't seem to mind their visit on what you would think was a romantic getaway that no one should know about but maybe the other lady who just posted is also correct that there are those times he does want us to know he has a girlfriend except for the times he doesn't, LOL
Do you know why that is. I was naively thinking it was just coincidence.
2:17pm - everything you posted after "I'm not 'mixing up' anything." does nothing but confirm my feeling that you're... mixing up what you/I/we-on-the-outside actually know (and have any reason or right to know), which isn't a lot, with having a clue what he/she/they actually know.
If Kiefer follows *what* line of thinking? Not taking her to what are important *to you* events in his life? The only event that you/others think he should have taken her to that he didn't that even comes close to falling into that category in a personal to him way, imo, was the Walk of Fame... and, even then, as difficult as it is for you to imagine that they both could've been just fine with that, it's not difficult for me to imagine at all. He's mostly done red carpet events as work events in all the many years he's been on 24.
Where I live (I mean to say psychologically), what really matters in a relationship is what the two people in the relationship know and think about it... not what ANYone else - much less utter strangers - knows or thinks about it... and I'm pretty happy in that place too. So I guess we're both good with our space! :)
I don't know if it's serious or not either; my only point, all along, has been that I don't believe that we can know that from afar, period.
2:16 PM, and you actually pointed out the difference and the confusion here. With Catherine and other girlfriends he didn't parade her or any of the others except for maybe Tricia, who some believe was PR as well, out and about. As someone here pointed out while he may have been totally justified to do so in his mind and others the fact is you don't put that genie back in the bottle so easily.
What genie in what bottle? ;)
So far as I can tell, there are somewhere between 5-10 people who are feeling truly frustrated about what they do/don't know about this relationship.
It's a very tiny genie in an itsy-bitsy bottle resting in a half-full thimble.
Christy, nothing this lady said mixed me up. I got it perfectly. Everyone has their own understanding of things.
Anna, I didn't say that *I* was mixed-up about what she said. I understand exactly what she said.
I just think that what she said demonstrates a "mixing up" between "how she thinks things about Kiefer's private/public life should be" with "how Kiefer thinks things about Kiefer's private/public life should be" (and I think the latter of those two wins out in reality).
Christy, you mention that Kiefer is treating all his events as work which is what he always has done. Not addressing you directly but others who believe Siobhan stands out from the others (girlfriends) then what's changed? Can't some hold to their belief that they are serious and in that belief wouldn't it seem natural to them that she would be treated differently than all the others? I understand maybe not to you but to other fans of Kiefer's it does ring true.
As for the genie in a bottle, that is to say that once he and he alone, made the decision to parade he and Siobhan out there he threw that red meat if you will to the hungry press as little as that may be with regard to Kiefer as well as the fans. Once you do that, once you give everyone something they expect more. That is life, that is life for everyone I know. I understand maybe not where you stand but certainly where alot of people do stand.
For what it's worth (my opinion,not much but anyway) I think he is confused with what he wants and think he is basically rather unhappy in his life.Someone said he hasn't answered any questions becasue he doesn't know the answer?Well yeh I can go with that theory too. None of us know anything at the moment.I've already said this but I do hope we will find out on the shows,just becasue I'm nosy thats all.:)Louise
Yep, Louise which is what I think the other lady is saying too and I agree with. I don't really think Kiefer himself knows what he wants and why would that be hard to believe or even be insulting to him. That's life. Many people don't know what they want out of it. He has been through alot over the last year. It was traumatic and without Knowing Kiefer personally I think I can still guess that. Add to that the enormous pressure he must be under from the Fox Executives, his father, his mother and mostly himself. It would drive anyone to confusion about their life. If that is the case with Kiefer it is totally understandable.
BTW, he may regret putting this relationship out there except that he still seems to be doing it so that goes right out the window for me cause I was willing to accept that at one point.
I agree Anna I believe the photos at San Diego were done by HELLO!Magazine. Now they are going to show up in our monthly installment of pics as someone pointed out.
When I seen the photo at Griffin Park in LA I knew something was wrong. Does anyone know how huge the Park is and Hello!...their just happen to be someone there with a camera, who knew where they would be in that huge Park. Please give me a break! Maybe the pics were done by Michael his driver!
They might be in a relationship but I don't buy into it being serious. He is taking her through the same pattern as his other women.
No drunken pics yet until after 24 airs.
Its becoming a routine, same old...same old stuff.
What?? NO paps or camera's in Paris?
It sounds like everyone is just repeating things over and over again... Nothing new...boring is the right word...so I'm out of here.
Anna, when you talk about treating her differently from the "others", my question is "what others?" My impression is that most of the people involved in this conversation have been following Kiefer closely mostly during his 24 years. At the *very* beginning of that period, he was with Catherine, but he also wasn't drawing a lot of press. He doesn't seem to have had a steady (where by "steady", I just mean that we've seen Siobhan now over the course of more than a year) girlfriend again during all of that time. Til now. When he was dating Kelly, he wasn't "big" and it seems that he learned his first major lessons about being WAY public with a relationship from the Julia thing. He's older and maybe a teeny bit anyway ;) wiser now than... well, than he's ever been before and he's also more famous right now than he's been since he was very young... and during that earlier turn with fame, there was no internet. :)
I genuinely don't know that we have an apples-to-apples comparison to look at.
Re: the genie thing, what I'm trying to say is that... yes, I too believe that the first couple of spring sightings were PR... but I also very much believe that the number of people who are interested at all in what those appearances mean relative to what events he brings Siobhan to now (or the like) is tiny and that the number of people who are upset by feeling that his current behavior is contradictory vis a vis those appearances is a tiny fraction of that tiny number. I truly believe that the idea that there's some kind of general outrage (or even interest) about his 'behavior' is way off-base.
Anna
beautifully put about Kiefer throwing out Red meat, I think that is how I feel about him having it both ways, I just didn't know how to explain myself. I completely agree with everything you said in your 2:55 post. Just seems to me that he does want it both ways, like a tease and being in the biz for as long as he has been he should understand that a tease will only bring forth more inquiries.
Anna
beautifully put about Kiefer throwing out Red meat, I think that is how I feel about him having it both ways, I just didn't know how to explain myself. I completely agree with everything you said in your 2:55 post. Just seems to me that he does want it both ways, like a tease and being in the biz for as long as he has been he should understand that a tease will only bring forth more inquiries. Pam
Louise, I would say that there's much evidence that points to Kiefer not knowing exactly what he wants at any given point in his life being almost a given! ;)
But, even if he's destined to be forever konfuzzled by life in some ways, I don't think that means that he wouldn't talk about what is/isn't going on in his relationship life if he wanted to do it. imo, if he wanted to talk about it, he would. And he just doesn't seem conflicted about that... to me, anyway.
Which is why, though I'm nosy too and I'd love for him to give us all the full scoop (whether on these upcoming talk shows or in general), I'm not holding my breath that he will. :)
Christy
I am tryng to agree with you here and I do to some extent, but he has dated several girls during his 24 stint and I guess that is what we are comparing her too. Also you say he is more famous now than ever before which I agree with, so then if he is that famous and still very few people are interested in his personal life, then he must not be that famous at all cause most celebs have alot of people who are interested in their personal life. I personally really don't care who he dates or if he dates, I would love for him to be happy, just seems that he is teasing a little and then wants everyone to back off. And that in a nutshell is my whole problem with celebs, They want PR went it is for their benefit but leave them alone otherwise, and you can't have your cake and eat it too. However, I don't think he owes us all the details, but just shouldn't dangle info out in front of us, if he doesn't want questions. Its' kind of like the popular girls whispering and giggling, trying to make everybody wonder what they are talking about. HOpe I made some kind of sense.
Pam
... but, Pam, more inquiries from where? :)
I just genuinely don't think that there's more than a tiny percentage of people who are even remotely interested in Kiefer who are likely even to have *noticed* that he "seems to have a girlfriend because I think I saw that in People back in April but I haven't seen her at any awards shows" or the like. And, even among those who are interested - even very interested! - in him and everything about him, I really do think that it's just a handful (or maybe two) who are feeling a sense of upset because they feel he's contradicting himself or being unnecessarily secretive or whatever other negative feelings.
So... if the question is "do Kiefer and Kiefer's people know that, in the world of fandom, there always are a handful or two of people who feel like they aren't getting enough information or the 'right' information?" Sure. That's how fandom works and I agree that anyone in the business knows that.
But that's really, really, really different from there being a general public outcry of "what's this guy up to, anyway?!"... which definitely doesn't exist.
Even if you don't agree, do you see what I mean?
You make a lot of sense to me Pam, but I'm sure someone will be around shortly to let you know how confused you are.
I understand what you're saying, Pam, but I think that what's missing from the "red meat" theory is the fact that PR is directed at the majority of the public... not the little minorities of uber-fans. Those who are interested enough in Kiefer to think more than once about whether or not he has a girlfriend, much less feel frustrated that he's sending what are perceived to be mixed signals is a tiny percentage of the overall market for celebrity 'news'.
They're not targeting The VeryVeryVery Interested (of which I definitely count myself one!... though I don't get frustrated by PR one way or another b/c I know it's not targeted at me as a Big Kiefer Fan). They're targeting the vast majority who may or may not see the occasional pic of Kiefer and a woman identified as his girlfriend together and say to themselves (maybe... if they're even that interested...), "Oh, he's got a girlfriend, huh? Maybe he's in better shape these days." and then forget all about it.
Most people are only passingly interested and aren't following every development/trying to piece it all together. We here and on other Kiefer sites ARE very interested and that's cool... but I sort of think of the "very" part of that phrase as being my/our "problem"... not his. ;) Feeling that way about it, speaking for myself, if following him ever made me feel crummy (frustrated, disappointed, angry, bored, whatever negative thing), I'd definitely stop doing it! :)
Oops, I forgot to sign... 4:01pm is me.
Pam, just wanted to get back to one of your points in your 3:27 post. Yep, he's dated LOTS of women during his 24 years! But none (save Catherine very early on in the 24 run and when he wasn't drawing much press) for an extended period of time... and, whatever their relationship is, Siobhan has been around a long time now by Kiefer-standards. That's all I was trying to say. :)
I think you have it mixed up Christy the Walk of Fame event was personal for Kiefer it was not work related. His family, friends and 24 crew were there. So, please stop mixing things up with your many opinions especially with the Walk of Fame. That was a PERSONAL event for Kiefer. It would have been fine to take her to it. Kiefer took Kelly to many premieres with him. What Siobhan not as important, well I guess not. How can you say the Paley event was work related in my opinion that was something fun that anyone would enjoy. Its Art! You just don't want to ADMIT to the fact that everyone on this site and other sites wondered where she was. It was then the tables got turned around about as far as this being a serious relationship. You protest to much with your opinions about it being serious and then in turn "you answer" with your "not sure". Most people see it either one way or another but you are looking at it both ways. Its either one or the other to you...make up your mind. Are you afraid to take a stand on whether it is or isn't a serious relationship because when it is over you will look like a fool? The ones who do take a stand in saying it is not a serious relationship aren't afraid to speak their mind.
As fas as the fans wanting to hear about Kiefers personal life with this women, (maybe just a little which there is nothing wrong with),you want to know just as badly as they do. So stop being so "judgmental" over everyones opinion and answers they are just as curious as you on the subject of his personal life. Kalin
Christy,
I do see your points, I really do, I guess I do need to seperate my total lac of respect for the Hollywood set and this particular blog. I do think that Kiefer is the lesser evil of the Hollywood set but he is still there and sometimes that does cloud my judgement on how Pr is handled. I guess what I am trying to say is that my aurgument isn't for or against Siobhan, I really dont care one way or another, but against the Hollywood machine and that argument really doesn't belong here, After all this is totally about the K man and his girlfriend.
I still must say though, that most other celebs get alot of questions as to who they are dating once their pics come out.
Pam
wow, I think somewhere here we mentioned his sweet deal with Extra, well they just sealed that comment when they talked about Kiefer saying in Re: to John Travolta's loss of his son. I have never seen anything where Kiefer and John were in the same circles, I am beginning to get really tired of this PR stuff. Extra really puts him out there every chance they get , This didn't even make sense, Tom Cruise I can understand cause they were always together, but not Kiefer, but Oh I forgot,Kiefer's PR people have Extra up his Ass. Sorru but the was crazy to post a his comment.
Another thing that makes me suspicious of all the PR, I just finished watching a clip over at Dazia's site, and I have seen alot of interview with him at public functions like this, but I have never seen his Evelyn his PR person ( I think that is who she is) so close to him at all times. It is like she is waatching a 5 year old and she can't let him out of her site.
Pam
You're right, Kalin... I am trying to look at all sides of the situation. Oh, the horror! ;) Moreso, really, I'm just trying to keep in mind that we're *totally* on the outside of his actual personal life... and that's as it should be (imo).
That said, I have said what I think, but here it is again...
1) We can't know for sure one way or another, but my take from afar is that I do think that they're together and that it's a fairly serious (by Kiefer standards) relationship. And if they're together, I'm totally fine with that. I don't know her (beyond third&beyond-hand rumors/gossip) so, imo, I can't "like" her or "hate" her, but it's not my call one way or another. It's his... and hers. If they're not together, that's also fine by me. I just think that they are.
2) Regardless of what I think personally about it, I don't put a lot of stock in the things that you and others feel are "definite signs that he's not serious about her." I know that you do. I just don't.
Can you go back and show me where I said that I'm not interested in everything about Kiefer? You won't be able to find that. What you will be able to find is me saying that I *am* interested in everything about Kiefer. I just also know that he's not ever gonna tell me everything I want to know and, beyond that, I don't think he owes me/us anything beyond his *work*.
I agree with you that the Paley event also was personal - as well as being work. I forgot about that. It falls into the same category for me as the WoF, i.e., it's not at all hard for me to imagine why she might not attend those events even if they're serious... in fact, especially if they're serious. I know we disagree about that and that's fine... but I definitely have no trouble understanding it as a possibility from my perspective.
... con't...
i.e., it's not at all hard for me to imagine why she might not attend those events even if they're serious... in fact, especially if they're serious. I know we disagree about that and that's fine, but I really have no trouble understanding that from my perspective.
Hey, Pam! I know you're just not a fan of the whole Hollywood thing... but, yeah, it's the world that Kiefer exists in... by definition! And I know that you're torn about the whole 'fan' thing in general and I can dig it! ... but I really don't think that this using publicity without really revealing is rare.
Sure, there are questions about celebs' private lives... but I just can't imagine that, if you dig into the details and specifics of any celeb's PR presence vs their private life that there aren't disconnects and that they don't talk about pretty much exactly what they want to talk about and not much more. :)
The Star also know that the internet took over TV entertainment shows, magazines and many people reading a newspaper. The internet NOW is everyone source of information and communication. On other sites they have ads of Stars just like they post here on this site. Comcast, AOL, Yahoo, MSN the list doesn't end advertising Stars. The internet is one of the biggest communication systems in the world. Kiefer Sutherland knows that this. It is why all the pics. Just to be notice and he is being notice by thousands across the world. Links also go into people emails from friend to friend about a star or show they are interest in. Word of mouth moves like lightening through the internet. You must be kidding about a small percent of people not see Kiefer on websites or hearing about him. Even my 70 year old Aunt is interest in Kiefer and other stars from TV shows. You can't get her off the internet. The internet is taking over newspaper and mags which will be a thing in the pass. It cost money to build websites alot of the sites are own by the Stars PRs they are the ones that build them and feed them information for the fans. They pay the host a fee to run them. They aren't going to give you this information. The media has taken over the internet, its every where. The media industry would not be rich if it wasn't for the Stars. The Stars rake in billions of dollars a year for these people and Fox(the person who own them)are one of them. It one of the biggest "Play Station" games around. The photos keep coming because people want to see a photo next to a write up. It would be like a childs book without pictures if there wasn't any to look at,they capture a persons interest.
What amazes me is that everyone seems to know so much about his love life even after he said he wasn't going to discuss it!
IMO, i hope they are together and he looks happy and i wish them the best!
ANON
do you know her, if not, how do you know she's a bitch?
I would like to add one more thing about my 70 year old Aunt. When I started to watch 24 I told her what a great show it is. She said, she wouldn't watch it because of Kiefers father Donald. She told me a lot of women in her circle of friends hated him because of the Jane Fonda stuff that happen. She said to me "like father like son". I told her I really believed Kiefer was different then his father but she had more information then me about Kiefer. She knew about his wife and him running around with other women. Lets just say, when he went to jail, I never hear the end of it.
I believe Fox had to put Kiefer out there more then ever because of the bad image he cause before going to jail and his jail time too. Its not because of what my Aunt said to me about Kiefer because I do have a opinion of my own but I believe this girlfriend is being used for his PR related stuff.
I agree with Kalin and Anna on the other issues about his relationship with her.
I agree with you 6:40. I think Fox really had to do damage control and I think that even though Kiefer talks about how supportive they were, they really have to watch him and every move he makes. I think they were very generous and if 24 hadn't been such a money maker, Kiefer would have been in a world of hurt, I think they would have told him to hit the road and don't let the door hit you in the butt on the way out. Like I said above, his publicist is so close to him now during every PR and work event it is pathetic and all of those people walkiing him to his car after the Fox party. If I were him I would be embarrassed to be treated that way, but he is a product and Fox has to protect their product. And also I do think that the GF is being used to some extent for PR but I don at least at one time they were interested in each other and may still be, but I just don't know. And also Kiefer did have a DUI during I think the 4th season, so they really can't be too happy with his actions.
evelyn is his PA not his PR person and has been seen in several pics for years
I'm sure we all watched the TMZ-vid where Kiefer after the 150th episode party got in the back of a car. This confirmed my opinion that he must be under a lot of pressure by Fox now. You certainly realized how many people accompanied him to the car and made sure that he is not going to drive himself? This sight made me very sad, as Kiefer was treated like a thing, that is worth several millions of dollars for the Fox-channel and not like the wonderful human being he is. I am sure he feels this for himself deep down in his soul. What do you think about this?
Why do you think his being escorted to a for hire car with his normal driver was FOX making sure he wasn't driving himself? Or that he is under pressure by the network?
His normal bodyguard/friend also escorted him and shielded him for the paps and I don't think he treats him like a thing. They are good friends.
I think he was being shielded because he was drinking that night and they didn't want him to be captured on video like that. His not giving autographs when he almost always does leads me to believe that. And if he had been drinking that to me would mean he doesn't feel much pressure from FOX at all because if he did he wouldn't have had even a sip of alcohol in front of them.
I think he's a beautiful human being too but he sometimes needs protection from himself. But in this case I actually smiled at all the people there protecting him (not controlling him)it was like he was the president or something. LOL :D
I really couldn't put my finger on what was so different with Kiefer but now I believe that all of this year was based on giving him a new image. This new image of Kiefer in my mind is all wrong and it has been a big turn off for me.
The Kiefer I remember was photographed taking his clothes into the cleaners. Sitting at a table in LA having lunch with a friend. Walking his dog Molly. Coming out of IW's with a wave. Coming out of a store with a bag in his hand. The list can go on but this list is what "normal" people do every day. Everything is staged this year. Even the girlfriend is a show and you realize it when he was at the Park with his new dog. Someone said it is a huge Park, how did they know where they were going? Who knew there were going to San Diego? LA and San Diego are BIG cities its like trying to find *a needle in a haystack*. The traffic is horrible. He takes her out once a month. I don't see them spending any quality time together. He is always working and it looks like he does it to avoid being with her. Its does seem we are getting a installment every month on them. Why not more natural photos! He visits his daughter in NY but got one set of pics of them. Where are the pics of him with his friends? Did they all leave him because of his jail time. Where are pics with his mother or sister? Does he not see them? What happen to all the pics that we would get of him and Rocco out and about? We know Rocco is at the Studio. Where are the pics of Kiefer coming and going from IWs with Jude Cole? One pic of IWs last year 08 and then nothing. Where in the hell are his good friends at?? No pics.
cont..at 2:31am
The Kiefer who lived and worked in LA most of his life fell off the face of the earth. The weird part, Kiefer still lives and works in LA but NO PICs of him there last year 08, OUT AND ABOUT.
I'm really getting tired and bored of these fake pics with his girlfriend (if that what she is) who I feel is a fake too. I want to see alot more normal pics of Kiefer doing normal every day things like he did in LA.
I feel sorry for this person he is turning into. He is beginning to look like a high class pimp selling himself. I hope he didn't throw out his painted jeans. I love those jeans with his beat up boots. I want the old... fun loving and honest Kiefer back. She is going to be Kiefers down fall and it has already started. Fans are realizing that since they been together its been a dishonest show. He has also been dishonest with this show. His beginning to look and act like everyone else in Hollywood. A FAKE
Agree with many of the posts above.Whoever said that there is usually questions after some photo's have been released well, I thought this too.I can't ever recall him being on the front cover with a woman like this.There is something going on behind the scenes,I feel anyway, which we don't know about.What that is I'm not sure.Yes fOX supported him but they had too, but behind the scenes I'm sure he was reprimanded heavily and I'm sure he felt embarassed by what he had done.
I too agree that there is something about him this year which is not right,hopefully things will calm down and we will see a more relaxed Kiefer.
That was me Louise above fogot to post my name.Christy just out of curiousity, why do you feel that they are together?
Ok so he was being protected from what? Him self that is ad also, things are just different, and his body guard who I know is his friend, really didn't seem too friendly that night, he looked like an employee and that is all. My opinion is Kiefer is an alcohloic, so his being under pressure from Fox really wouldn't bother hime, just like this being his 4h DUI. He hasn't learned cause he has a disease. If he doesn't feel pressure then he is more dumb that I thought. I do not dislike him, but times are changing, and I fear that he will not be on top for much longer. An sure he smiled while leaving, that is his job. That is actors do, they act. And yes 2:58 I too am beginning to believe that Kiefer is a fake, we will see what happens, once 24 if over. Unfortunately, I feel like watching Kiefer is a train wreck waiting to happen, And we all know that you just can resist watching a train wreck, and that is sad for him.
Ladies, I agree with som many of you and don't want to leave anyone out but Pam, Kalin and particularly 7:32 PM for bringing this up. You are so no target with your post and thank you for bringing up the other night. Have you ever seen 4-5 bodyguards have to escort Kiefer to his car like that. He is a grown man. You mentioned he might have been ashamed by it or should have. The first thought that popped into my head watching it was that I personally felt ashamed for him!!
Wow, I am realizing all my typos, Ugh. But what I wanted to add is that I totally agree with those who feel much of what Kiefer has done has been for public image consumption. The PR campaign, IMHO, started immediately after his release from the overnight stay following his DUI arrest. Kiefer immediately went into spin control with the help of Fox and I don't blame any of them for it cause they are paying him alot of money and they rely heavily on him for money and ratings. As I said just above, the other night was just the latest example. While I am glad they didn't let him drive home, of course, and wish they had done that last September 25, 2007 I just thought it looked odd with all those bodyguards. Actually to one of the posters most star don't wave back but that was the only thing Kiefer was basically permitted to do in the absence of posing or signing autographs. Someone brought up LA and as much as I think lots of the NYC pics especially with Siobhan looked staged you have to wonder if Kiefer doesn't die to get back to NYC just to avoid all the driving around and bodyguard business. It just isn't him but Kiefer got himself into a mess and unfortunately for him these are the results. I bet he doesn't like it at all but probably doesn't have much choice. I personally think he looks sad and that is my opinion on the matter and I think the reason may be that he feels caged. I may be wrong and may be Ann can shed light but I see it.
Thanks for your comments Linda and 7:32 was me, Pam, I jusst forgot to sign my name. I do that alot. But I think you are probably right and I never thought about it, but I bet now he prefers NYC over LA. And I bet he does feel caged, and almost like a 2 year old that you put on a leash so he won't run away.
Pam
ROTFLMAO at the things you all "worry" about.
The guy is living and loving life the only thing fake is the 'concern' and 'worry' about him.
Geeezzzeee, enjoy the hot pis and move on with your own life. All careers for actors go in cycles. He's enjoying the up time and so should his fans. What a waste of energy anything else is.
I'm outta here!!! This site is a sucking black hole of whiny downers.
OK Bye, see ya
2:31
I can totally relate to what you are saying about Kiefer out and about in LA. Love the painted jeans also. I'm also bored with the same photos. I agree with you about the natural photos we have seen of Kiefer shopping etc: You are also right too that in the previous years we got "alot" of natural photos of Kiefer walking around LA with friends. It would seem he is keeping out of sight when he is in LA and I'm not talking of events. I wonder if he is hiding something in LA. Maybe NY is to draw the attention away from him when he is there. Everything is looking fake/staged and making a bad impression.
I think all the bodyguards were making sure Kiefer made it straight home without any detours. Fox probably felt responsible about his DUI last year and the press and fans played a part in taking pics of him last year drinking and driving. Fox didn't want the press down their lovely throats. I'm not sure but good point. I never seen him with so many before. I did feel bad for the fans who were waiting outside but I'm sure the press were also in wait. They were lying in wait to get a pic of the drunken Kiefer. Maybe?...Kalin
Kalin, there is definitely a more controlled environment around Kiefer even in NYC although I don't think it is as tight because remember wherever he goes in the Village he can walk to and then he can get back quickly to his apartment without being seen. For all we know Siobhan is part of that package. Keep in mind she would have been the lady on the scene who he had at the very least hooked up with prior to his DUI which therein lies the convenience factor of already knowing her. Again, I am not getting into their relationship but I think there is a consensus and she is part of it along with Kiefer, Fox Executives and Kiefer's people which has been going on since his DUI arrest even before jail to control his movements, if you will. I wouldn't be at all surprised if all of these individuals have been handpicked to watch over him and that includes Michael, Florian and yes, maybe even Sib and probably a handful of others. I think Kiefer is still drinking and hasn't controlled it and that would be cause for concern for all those involved, IMHO.
This is the kind of thing that always went on in the old studio days and there was nowhere near the media attention you have now. To tell the truth I don't think this is that common anymore although still done but I think in Kiefer's case it was required because his is really a unique case in that the network is totally dependent on him to a big degree for the success and financial stability of that network. Between worldwide DVD sales and all they really rely on a reliable Kiefer.
Possibly Kalin about a drunken Kiefer pic. The only LA pics we get now are at events or that staged, IMO, getaway with Siobhan that we got. Unfortunately, if that is the plan it isn't airtight cause we got a private sighting a day or two after anyway. They can't control the public even if everything else.
Hi Louise. To respond to your question from up-thread a bit...
It's my gut instinct that he and Siobhan really are "together together" because they've been spending time with one another for such an extended period of time (by Kiefer & women standards ;))... and because he has spent a lot of his off time since he got out of jail in NYC... and, though I know that some people believe that they're just friends or business associates, I don't. Also, I actually perceive the fact that he's been seen out and about so much less in general, the fact that there's no PDA between them, and the fact that he doesn't bring her to "official" events as potential evidence that that they really are trying (with whatever degree of success... because we know that Kiefer's got his issues and who knows what issues she does or doesn't have herself) to have an ongoing relationship. D2 expressed my thoughts about that really well in her posts way upthread, i.e., basically, I can easily imagine limiting contact out & about (not to mention limiting being seen out & about in general) because they're making a real attempt to have as 'normal' a relationship as is possible within the constraints of his being famous.
I know that's an 180 degree different interpretation of those things than some others make, but there you go. I also know this may be incorrect. It's just my gut take based on what I see/how I perceive what I see. :)
3:52 - I have a really specific question about your post...
You say that you're "beginning to think that Kiefer is a fake." My question is... a fake what?
I just truly don't understand that statement. Do you mean you're beginning to think that Kiefer is in showbiz? Because that's been true... well, forever! :)
I don't believe Christy that everything was staged/PR related before his jail time with Tricia/Catherine at events as you been saying. At the GGA event with Tricia he told the Press she was a *friend* and I believed him. The press made it into a love affair not Kiefer. Kiefer had no reason to stage anything before his DUI in 07. He was honest/upfront when he did press/TV interviews. Even in the doc "ITYTKM" he was pretty damn honest with his marriages/he admitted he went out partying he enjoyed it on his down time. Now it is nothing but hide & seek he is playing. This fake stuff with pretty photo pics to show he is being a good boy is just fake. I'm not the only one who believes that Kiefer is playing a role for Fox in public. He involved this woman in this playacting role,if he cared/respected her he would have kept her in the background. All of this stage acting started in 08 when Kiefer got released from jail.Kiefer was only one of the few in Hollywood who I truely believed put his *real* self out there for his fans.That's the reason we took a shine to him. At least I did.I would have never labeled Kiefer as one of those Hollywood people but that is who he is becoming. The reason he likes NYC is so he can hide his drinking, who knows where it will lead. Most likely into something way beyond his control or drugs.So don't forget those sad photos of him in bars drunk in 08. How can Kiefer be in this serious relationship when he can't even control his own problems.She isn't helping any by sitting in bars with him. Is this his standard of a relationship you are referring to or yours?? Kalin
I think Kalin answered your question about being fake, I agree with her, the Kiefer we see now is so different from the one he has been, so one of them if fake as far as I am concerned. I think that he does have to be controled by Fox, like a little kid has to be controlled, becuase he can't do it himself. God help him when 24 ends and he doesn't work as much as he does on 24, he has said it himself, 24 keeps him safe.
Kalin - you ask, "How can Kiefer be in a serious relationship when he can't even control his own problems." You're kidding, right? People who have problems are in serious relationships all the time. If having problems disqualified people from having relationships, there'd be a mess more single people in the world than there are. :) Anyone who's ever been in a serious relationship with Kiefer has been in a relationship with someone with big problems. He's had a drinking problem his entire adult life. How does being in NYC "hide" his drinking? The only thing it does is make it easier for him to avoid driving drunk but, as has been noted here, he's been spotted drunk in both LA and NYC... so I'm not quite sure what you're getting at. I do think his public persona has been different since he got out of jail, but I don't think it's a negative that he's not been spotted/photographed in bars on a constant basis. Of course, FOX has expectations around his professional behavior - but, then, they always would have had - and, of course, they're going to make sure he doesn't drive away from any official FOX event if he's had even a drink. That's no mystery. But I guess I'm missing what about him not being out drunk in bars every night makes him "fake."
As for his drinking leading to drugs... I'm sorry, but that statement just demonstrates your naivete about his drinking and drinking in general. He's a drunk - and has been for as long as he's been on the public scene and probably before that - and THAT'S his drug of choice (if you don't count cigarettes... and work...).
7:38pm - it looks to me like you're just coming to terms with the fact that Kiefer has a drinking problem... but he's had that all along... before jail... before the DUI. And, yes, he's said "I do better when I'm working" and that's always been true. Thus, while it certainly is entirely possible that not quitting can destroy any alcoholic's life, the "God help him when 24 ends" is, imo, a little melodramatic... or, at the very least, a little unclear on the fact that that's always been the case.
i'm with you Christy when you say "kiefer and siobhan are together", i don't really think it is a work relationship or a PR thing just two people who seem to try to spend their free time together.
Kiefer spends more time now in NY than in LA, and this sighting in Paris, hum, i'm sure she was with him. I'm not sure he plays a game with her or his fans, he just wants to live a "normal" life with his girlfriend. If he is happy with her and according to me, he has changed his way of living because of her (even if we have some bar sightings), i hope it will last.
Well,just as we have been told repeatedly that we don't know what their relationship is, how can anyone know if he has changed his way of living because of her? Why, because you read it in a tabloid?
Just to add a bit more info on Paris or fuel to the fire whatever you wish to call it lol! A girl posted a picture of herself on flickr and stated she had just seen Kiefer at the Pont Neuf ( a bridge over the Seine). When asked for more details she said he was not alone but with in her words " a beautiful brunette ".
No Christy I'm not naive and I'm beginning to believe you are the one who is not very worldly of what is happening in todays times. People who drink sometimes jump into drugs or do both. They get involved with drugs because they can hide it easier from coworks, friends etc. Actors aren't screened for alcohol/drugs. People who have serious problems need some kind of fix. If people are watching Kiefers every move with drinking I said it can lead into drugs.
Lets get something straight..none of us said he was not seeing her, we are taking a stand about him in a *serious* relationship with her which you keep expressing. We weren't talking about people in general with their relationships, we are talking about Kiefers. He knows he has problems with relationships in his life and he isn't willn't to commit himself into one. He *isn't ready* or *he isnt willing* to fight his addiction to alcohol. He is smarter then you. He knows its going to lead into the same thing as it was with Kelly & other women because he *does* realize he has issues with drinking/partying. As long as *Kiefer knows* he has issues he will never commit again. That's why he said he was single/having fun and didn't want to make a commitment out loud to the public because it will be embarrassing for him/her when it ends. Lets get something else straight by him throwing her out there for the public to see he knew the media/fans would interpret it as something serious. In other words he put a label on it too which leads to everything he said as being untrue/fake if you will, misleading. Kalin
i'm sure some people will tell that this beautiful brunette is not Siobhan LOL.
Ursula - I can't find the comments. How do you get there?
cont..by Kalin
Yes the the general public doesn't see Kiefer drunk, the strip clubs,sitting in bars with his girlfriend, sitting on street corners smoking, know about his background with women, his 12 years strange marriage, his many DUIs, his cheating, him kissing men, visiting gay bars, his partying, his distance relationship with his father, the list can go on as to what the general public doesn't know about him. The general public will believe.."This guy is really did learn something from his time in jail and is trying to make a fresh start" but to his fans who haven't seen this change, its lies and misleading info. Its fake stuff to the loyal fans who have followed his life story. He has neglected the loyal fans that are the ones buying everything he puts out. He neglected his loyal fans for the general public. Will they be there when 24 is over? Will they follow his life after 24? With this misleading info I see him as only a piece of meat/a pimp selling himself to the highest bidder for a price. I really don't want to follow a Celeb. who has become dishonest with misleading info. to us and to the public for money. He has become like all of Hollywood. Fake
I thought a brunette had brown hair? I think Siob has black hair. Is this right information?
Is this all the girl said? It could be anybody.
Anon at 6.19am you need to sign in, then you can mail a comment/question and it's up to the person if they reply.
6:35, LOL, welcome, you're the first to say it could be anybody... so not Siobhan.
I begin to wonder if some people here, even if they deny it, are not jealous of this woman. The reality is that he dates her and she's a beautiful woman, and you will never be her. Open your eyes ! She lives with him and they travel around the world together. I like Kiefer as an actor and i find him very cute but we don't and we 'll never belong to his world. And if Siobhan is still with him in 4 or 5 years we will be able to say she's the "one", today, i wish her/them good luck.
I thought brunettes were anybody that wasn't red or blond, I have a pretty good feeling he was with Siobhan in Paris.
Pam
LOL!!!
Speak for yourself 7.59!
How do YOU know what we look like/feel/what we do for a living? Don't assume that because we are on this site that we are all nobodies!
7:59 I thing you are correct he does date her and they do travel around the world, and I believe she does live with him while he is in NYC,. I also agree that we will never be in his world and all I can say is thanks God for that, I would want no part of that world, I think Kiefer is the exception is SOME areas, but still he does have some of the problems of the people in that world. Just ask Dr Drew, it is in their make up, he has done studies and most celebs are really not mentally stable and have very destructive and additive personalities.
I don't think she meant we are no bodies 9:37 but most of us and you may be, and it you are I am sorry, but most of us are not in that world. I don't know what the fascination with that world is, well I do for teenagers cause it looks so good on the outside. I don't think anybody is a nobody. Think about it, and I have alot cause I was obsessed at one time wishing I was in that world, But basically all they do is sell themsevles, Kiefer at this point in his life is pretty much owned by Fox and you think he isn't you are crazy. They are a property that makes them money, not much short of being a prostitute is you think about it. And I have seen much more attractive and people who do way more inportatn jobs that those in the entertainment field. and I say that as a parent of a child who everyone is convinced will be a very famous person one day because of his personality and his looks, I get this even from strangers, but I am trying hard to discourage him even though he thinks he wants to do this.
Pam
Of course Kiefer is "with" her. That much to me is very obvious Where I see things differently than some is just how committed he is to her ... which I think basically he is not. I would be surprised if she didn't go to Paris with him. It's the perfect place for them to be together; partying on New Years Eve, livin it up in a luxury hotel in Paris. He would be crazy to give her up. As long as she is willing to accept the limitations he has set, and will come running when he wants her there, then why on earth would any man walk away from that?
Yep, Pam. I think people refer to non-blonds and non-redheads as brunettes. My guess is Siobhan too. I also agree about Kiefer being owned or if you will controlled by Fox. Makes perfect sense since he makes lots of money for them. That is just the business they are in. Kiefer's big career issues will arise when 24 is over.
Just wanted to pick out one point Christy made and it may be small but as far as Kiefer coming to NYC so much and also buying a house. I said to people two years ago pre-Siobhan that he would do this. He would be coming to NYC with or without her presence. Just a small item but I keep seeing it lumped in the reasons for Pro-Siobhan if you will. Don't personally think she has anything to do with that decision at all and I am not even certain Sarah does cause she could move back to LA after college and I think he would still be here.
continuing on ... keeping a low profile, or not discussing a relationship, is entirely understandable. But it's hard to fathom that she would be absent at almost all the major moments in his life. And the fact that he seems to not even want to acknowledge that he has a girlfriend seems really weird to me. He will prance around with her one day to show the industry people he is in a stable relationship, and yet when asked on Letterman what he did for Christmas, he goes into this thing about having lost the Christmas spirit for awhile when the kids got older, but now has it back with his 4 year old grandson. That left the impression that he spent Christmas with his daughter and grandson, and I highly doubt that is true. Why couldn't he have just said "I spent the holiday with my girlfriend in NY." Certainly Dave would not have asked him for details. It's just so bizarre.
9:37, don't take this like that ... we are not "nobodies" but people who are not in show business.
Oops sorry 9:48 for getting in the middle of your post, LOL
Pam, keep trying to talk him away from it. It's a horrible lifestyle and totally fake.
That is why men like Kiefer gravitate towards women like Siobhan. Notice all of the top actors stick with Models, Fashinonistas or other Actresses. That's cause they are all from the same mold. I think maybe some are dissappointed with Kiefer for choosing this route at least for now but that is the reality of their world. Kalin, I totally understand where you're coming from. To answer your question, I would say Kiefer was as close to real as could be prior to the DUI arrest in September but the spin control went into effect immediately thereafter.
I agree with you Linda bout Siobhan not being the reason he moved to NYC, I don't think any woman would have that much influence over him if he didn't want to go already.
sorry fotgot to post my name but that is me Pam on 10:05.And yes Linda, I thought that was weird too about Christmas, his kids spening it with boyfriend and girlfriends, I didn't think his stepsons were old enough to have spent past Christmases with girlfriends, and also I thought his grandson lived in LA. I doubt that they brought a 4 year old away from his home on Christmas. Just another thing in Kiefer's world that doesn't make sense. Just say he sepnt it with a friend of girlfriend, and quit being so secretive. If he spent it with her that is all he has to say and if they ask further questions say I would like to keep that private. In my opinion he is becoming quite confused about his own life, or he is turning into a real liar.
I just don't get the tempest in the half-full thimble and never will, I guess. It's clear to me that he and Siobhan are together and it seems to me like it is a fairly together-together (by Kiefer standards... and, for all ANY of us know, maybe by hers too). How "together together" are they? Who knows? All of the trying to figure out how committed they are is pointless. We don't know and he's not gonna tell us. :)
To all of those who are disturbed by Kiefer's relationship with publicity... I just... well, it just kinda seems to me like, if you're disturbed by an actor's relationship to publicity (especially an actor who's currently on an up in his career... and, so, is getting a lot of publicity), following an actor might be a pretty disturbing enterprise for you. Kiefer's an actor/public person. He always has been. He has a private persona and he has a public persona. By almost every account known to us, he's very well-liked in his private life for being a kind, hardworking man... with some major issues. He works very hard at his job and succeeds at it magnificently and he also struggles (and always has) with his 'demons'. FOX knew that when they hired him and that's no doubt been an ongoing struggle, sometimes better and sometimes worse, through all his years on the show. It's no doubt been an issue throughout his work life. It's always seemed to me like there's no question that his publicists have earned every penny he's paid them. :)
But this isn't new. If you thought he was someone who didn't have a publicity life AND a private life before now, you were, to put it bluntly, wrong. I just can't, for all the life of me, understand why it's so difficult to understand that he would've been willing to be public in the sense of tipped photo ops with Siobhan AND not want to talk about his relationship with her at all. To me, that just seems as easy to understand as the sun rising in the east. I just don't think that "yes, I have a girlfriend* and, no, I'm not going to talk about it." (* which doesn't mean he's not technically "single"... ;))
Pam, this post at 10:11 AM so hits it. These silly almost idiotic things he says. It's like in the MV article where he states he spent past Christmas's with Camilia and her boyfriend, REALLY?? Are you kidding me?? and in this new Hello article with regard to Julia that they are friends, again REALLY?? more kidding me, LOL. Pam, that is all he has to say - Oh I spent Christmas in NY with my girlfriend and that's all he has to say. Why go off on a silly tangent and lead people to believe it's one thing and not another?? Maybe because it doesn't sound as nice to say I spent it with a girlfriend than my family. If that is what it is then so be it. If you make a decision then live with your decisions, right. I think this is what Kalin is trying to say as well. We all know he has a girlfriend so why pretend like it's some secret. Just be natural.
P.S. I realize that the masses don't care one way or another but in the end and I agree with Kalin here too, in the end it is the loyal fan base that comes to matter. It is the loyal fan base that keeps the actor or actress afloat!!
Christy, you say all this trying to figure out how committed he is is pointless ... ok, that's you're opinion and you are entitled to it. But obviosuly other folks here are not so clear on it and want to keep discussing it ... so why does it feel like you are basically telling us we shouldn't be talking about it? Maybe we're just stupid ignoranr people and will never understand things, no matter how many times you explain them to us.
And just to clarify yet again, I don't want him to talk about her or their relationship. I just "wonder" why he seems not to even want to acknowledge it's existance.
Linda, Pam - I don't think he moved to NYC *because of* Siobhan either. Linda, like you (though I'm not sure if for the same reasons), I've thought for years (i.e., way before Siobhan) that NYC would be a place that Kiefer would love if he gave it a chance... and that clearly seems to be the case! :) I just don't think that rules out the possibility Siobhan being there is one of the possible reasons he's spent a lot of time there in the past year. After all, we know she also spent a month in LA (and, despite the belief by some that she's a media whore, without ever appearing at an LA "hot spot" during that time) this past summer. To me, it just seems pretty clear that they've made an effort to spend time with one another when schedules allow over the past year.
As for the stuff about Christmas on Letterman, I guess what I'm surprised by is the degree to which it seems like people really have believed that everything that he's said on talk shows in the past was totally "accurate." It's publicity. He gives up what he wants to give up about his personal life and no more. Is it possible that Michelle, Adam and Hamish came to NYC at some point over the holidays? Sure. Is it possible that they didn't? Sure. I believe the essence of that statement (that holidays aren't always easy for him but, for whatever reasons, he felt a little more 'in the spirit' - as he said (imo) cutely under his breath - this year) without having to know the accuracy of the details. I mean, he didn't spend "4 (maybe 5)" years not working after he first starting rodeoing either. Not even close. But I understand the essence of that statement - i.e., that his career went into such a downswing that it felt like he wasn't working - while knowing that it's not a *technically* accurate statement.
Chrisy,
I didn't say that he never had a private life and I didn't say that he can't have one now, but just say it is private and I don't want to discuss it, rather than lie about it. Amd yes I know that he has always struggled with his demons, but he is more popular now than ever and those demons are seen by more people now. And yes I think Fox knew that, but what does that have to do with what I said about Fox, they own him, sorry but that is the way it is. He is one of their main money makers now, and they have to keep him straight. And I am glad you think it is easy to understand why it is normal for him to tip off the paps about pics and then not want to talk about it. I understand not giving details, but you can't put the pics out there and not expect questions. If you think that is normal then you to put it bluntly are wrong. And just to add, I am not a Siobhan hater I don't know her and if they are together and he is happy then I am very happy for him. I am just confused by the things that he says. But maybe all that alcohol has killed some brain cells, cause I am beginning to believe that he is delusional.
And really at this point I am following just out of sick morbid curiosity, to see what happens, much like britney Spears, couldn't stand her, but just couldn't avoid that train wreck either.
Pam
Pam
Linda, I disagree that it's the "loyal" (as in "obsessed"... and I include myself in that number... :)) fan base that keeps an actor's career afloat. By definition (i.e. because there are way way way more people in the "masses" than there are in a loyal/obsessed fan base), it's the masses of people who watch a TV show or go to a movie that keep an actor's career afloat.
You know what I think about the answer to this question, but can I ask you...
How many people do you think are WAY interested in Kiefer's love life? Of that number, how many people do you think are feeling jerked around in a negative way by his current public persona? I'm genuinely interested in what you think those numbers are.
10:28 AM, that's also my wonderment, LOL. I mean to think that he doesn't go out and about in NYC anymore just to avoid having their picture taken or he dances around a question about who he spent Christmas with is just plain silly to me. I realize he feels he got burned over the Julia breakup but please, Kiefer, this is not 1991 and you aren't Brad Pitt as much as I love you, LOL. That was a different time and place and in that instance it was Julia who was all over the place talking about how in love they were. Nobody here or that I personally know are Kiefer fans, and I actually know several from my workplace and family, expect him to expound, if you will, on his great love for Siobhan. Just not to pretend she doesn't exist. Cause, Kiefer, here is a news flash, LOL there is this thing called the internet and we have seen the pictures, LOL LOL!!!
Hi Pam.
Hey, that you're watching in a 'trainwreck' way makes sense to me. What's interesting is that, to me, he seems like less of a trainwreck to me now than he has in the past. The more he protects his private life in interviews, the more I think "good for him." But, clearly, we just see things differently and that's cool!
Re: not being able to put pictures out without expecting questions, I agree. Who said that he/his publicity folks didn't know there would be questions? But questions don't have to be answered.
I think that you're the poster at 10:28 too, yes? If so (and, actually, even if not :))... I'm not saying that people shouldn't discuss it. I'm just saying that I'm baffled by why some people (and I really do believe it's a small number of people) are puzzled/angered/enraged (or somewhere along that scale) by his not wanting to talk about his relationship-life. Given the difficulties he's had in that area in the past, it just makes such perfect sense to me that he's not going to talk about it unless/until there really is a public commitment made (i.e., they really do get engaged/married... and, to be clear, who knows if that ever will happen?!). I wouldn't even expect him to talk about it a lot then. But, yeah, of course people can/will continue to talk about it. I'm just expressing my opinion... which is that I find the 'tempest' response to this to be really interesting.
Linda, would the "several from your workplace and family" be waiting for Kiefer to expound on Kiefer if they didn't know you? With respect, imo, your thinking on this subject kind of contradicts itself... that is, I agree that he's not a subject of huge public curiosity (a la Brangelina, for example)... but, then, how many people really care what his relationship with Siobhan is? It's just uber-difficult for me to imagine that, internet or not, people who don't follow him closely (as, say, you and I do) would give a hoot one way or another. Truly. :)
p.s. who said he doesn't go out in NYC to avoid having his picture taken? Not me. I just think that it's possible (maybe not, but I think it's certainly possible) that, both in LA and in NYC, he's spending more time at home... y'know, like people who don't go out drinking every night do. ;) :)
Pam, totally agree with you again and I know from past you have never been one to take a stand one way or another about Siobhan. I know sometimes my judgement may be clouded by what I think of her as open minded as I try to be but for the most part I do take everything into account and I still don't get some of this.
Christy, I don't have a number for you but I don't think it matters how large or small it may be. Remember, Kiefer has a worldwide following so his numbers may be bigger than you think. It is the loyal fanbase that buys up everything the famous person is selling, it is the loyal fanbase who keeps the fansites active (those fansites get the casual fan more involved), it is the loyal fanbase who go to dvd signings and comic con events and 24 events, etc. that are open to the public and that is where the famous person gets his positive reinforcement. The Comic Con did more for Kiefer's self-confidence, I am betting, than anything over the last year did. And if only 5 - 10 fans (btw, I know 4 alone just in my office)feel jerked around by Kiefer, is that ok. Something tells me Kiefer wouldn't think so since he told Dietcoke right to her face that one person's negative posting on the internet out of 100 is what bothered him even if all the others were glowing.
Christy,
Nope not the poster at 10:28, Can't take credit for that one. And yes he does seem like less of a train wreck know. And for some reason that is why I am watching so close. Like the calm before the storm I guess. And I don't think that he has to give out any detail, but once the cat is out of the bad, and that bad has been pre arranged, a( and I belive it has) then just say yes, I am currently dating someone and I won't give any further details
Pam
Linda, oops, the first sentence in my 11:02 post should have read, ".. would the "several people from your workplace and family" be waiting for Kiefer to expound on his relationship status if they didn't know you?"
I hate that it's not possible to edit to correct stuff like this here! :)
Christy, @ 11:02, I am confused by that. Cause these are people who are co-workers (actually, one is the neice of a co-worker) who are uber Kiefer fans so the only thing involving me is that we can all discuss it but they seem to have the same level of interest I do, so not sure of the question.
Linda, I do think the number matters, because what Kiefer always has wanted to be - and what I hope he *will* be when this wave of big stardom/publicity ends, as it inevitably will - is a working actor. There are lots and lots and lots of very successful and well-respected working actors who don't have loads of fan sites, etc. This is a wave. He's riding it. It will crash to the shore. He knows that. And, at that point, he'll be left with his talent, his work ethic, his personal life and whatever state he's in relative to his personal issues. For me, hopefully, he'll take enough care of himself that he'll have a long, rich career as a character actor, something he's brilliant at, imo.
woman?!!!... etc).
I interpret the "the one out of a hundred posts" thing differently than you do. I didn't hear "I don't want there to *be* any negative posts" - imo, he's WAY too smart to believe that it's possible to please everyone with anything (whether you're a celebrity or otherwise). I think all he was saying is that he doesn't want to *see* those inevitable posts because they will bother him.
So, yes, my answer is that, if 5-10 fans feel jerked around, it's "okay"... because it's inevitable. If those 5-10 (or 50 or 100) fans weren't ticked off at him about this, they'd (in whatever different combinations) be ticked off at him about something else (his hair's too short... it's too long... a beard?!... I hate that outfit... why did he make that movie?... what's he doing with
You can't please all of the people all of the time is a truism for a reason. :)
Hey, Linda... if they're all uber-Kiefer fans, then there you go. I just am surprised that there are so many uber-Kiefer fans in any one circle of friends who didn't meet *because* they're uber-Kiefer fans. :)
Ok, I see your question now. Nope, I don't think that at all and I certainly don't expect him to do that. I don't even think that is realistic to expect that. What I would expect him to do is answer the question in general terms just as Pam pointed out cause like it or not the pictures are out there and Kiefer is the one who did it. Remember, part of our basis here is what he did in the past but in the past he never put out pictures like this so there was really nothing to address or discuss. Pam is correct. Once you put the pictures out it is a tease. As I said yesterday, you are throwing out "red meat". Now he doesn't want to even acknowledge the "red meat" which basically says to me that he is telling all of us, go stick it or mind your own darn business but of course not so nasty. I am just trying my best to get the point across.
What he has done is use the press and the paparazzi to put out his pretty pictures for his benefit but then wants to pretend he hasn't done that.
It's interesting to me now that Hello has this romantic couple poll out and they are included and that's because of his "red meat". Gee, wonder if he wins if he'll respond to Hello's question about it, LOL
Btw, I wanted to apologize to Anna cause she used the "red meat" theory, LOL. Sorry Anna, didn't want you to think I stole your line. But I have been telling my Kiefer friends at work that same thing so that's why I loved your post.
I do understand your point (and others' points) about the "red meat"; I just don't agree with it.
From a publicity/celebrity point of view, I just genuinely don't see being willing to "go public" with a photo op or two and choosing not to go further public as particularly contradictory. To me, seeing it as contradictory works from the assumption that he's obligated to talk about it because it's "known about"... and I just don't believe that he is.
Re: the Hello poll... well, I doubt they'll win ;)... but, if they did, I also very much doubt it would cause him to comment. Then again, I've never seen him comment on being voted "Sexiest" in their year-end poll either. :)
Well Christy, we will have to agree to disagree cause I don't think it's been a photo op or two. IMHO, it's been more than that and I include the ones on Malibu at the beginning of August and the lunch pictures in June and the recent pictures in San Diego but that's me. I am sure others don't agree with that assessment. Oops, and don't forget that rehearsed little scene in the Men's Vogue interview, wink wink!!
P.S. just with regard to the out and about stuff in the West Village. Yes, he may be staying in more as far as not going to bars (although that is a hope but we don't know if reality) but they don't even walk around or walk to a restaurant or shopping or to the grocery store or anything? Same in LA, as Kalin I believe pointed out we saw him out and about going to the cleaners, the car wash, an outdoor cafe - those aren't bars. It wasn't always a bar. Just cause he isn't going to bars in those places and is staying in more doesn't mean he doesn't go out at all does it?
You're right, there have been additional publicity moments (I don't necessarily agree about all of those photos, but that's cool; I do agree about the Men's Vogue). I just still don't think that equates with him being obligated (or, even if not 'obligated', in any way needing to... at least not for me) to say anything about the relationship. But, yes, we'll just have to continue to agree to disagree.
I think that we have seen him out and about a bit... in both LA and NYC... just not as much as we sometimes have. I think that he's always gone out to the car wash, the cleaners, the grocery store, outdoor restaurants, etc withOUT being photographed way more than he has been photographed doing those things.
But I may be misunderstanding what you're saying... are you thinking that he's being "forced" to stay inside by FOX?
No, definitely don't think FOX is pulling that much of a string to "force" him to stay inside. That comment by me was related to Siobhan. This thing about him keeping it low key. Well, if you look at all his recent trips to NYC and we know he came in October, November and December we got none of these pictures even by accident. My point was while Kiefer suddenly may want to keep it low key however contradictory or hypocrital I see that by him to some degree it seems strange that we got no pictures of them doing any of these things even by "accident". I mean are we to believe he is just hiding inside. No, we know he most likely isn't. So how come now no pictures of them together when we got a flurry in April through June. Did the paparazzi all at once leave the West Village? Also, not very likely. That was what I was saying. Look he took her to Paris for New Year's Eve and that wasn't "documented" so they must go out right? Just seems abit weird again to me anyway, just asking!
And yes, how odd with the uber fans in my surroundings. I thought so too and one is my assistant so two people working closely together. The other one I just found out about this week, LOL!!
I think he was bigger news when he first went public (in general, much less with Siobhan) after he got out of jail... so, I think there was some tipping and some paparazzi interest on their own. Those pics obviously didn't sell well, though (given how few we saw in magazines), so the interest diminished. Follow the money, as ever! :) At least that seems entirely likely to me.
No, I don't think they stay inside all the time in NY or that they did in Paris (I mean, obviously they didn't stay inside the whole time in Paris since they were sighted). I guess I just don't understand what the disconnect or weirdness is between them being photographed because of a tip vs them otherwise not being photographed much at all. In fact, doesn't that actually make sense, i.e., that, without a tip, they don't draw much pap interest? I think if you combine that with him/them possibly not going out as much, you get a mostly "undocumented" relationship. If they wanted it to be more documented, they could hit more hot spots (like Pastis and Waverly Inn). Kiefer certainly knows where to be photographed in LA. So, to me, the fact that they weren't photographed in any of those spots during the month or so (apparently) she was there last summer points to the distinct possibility that, while he/she/they aren't adverse to a tipped photo op if it's deemed valuable to his publicity, they don't - on their own - court it.
I think he was bigger news when he first went public (in general, much less with Siobhan) after he got out of jail... so, I think there was some tipping and some paparazzi interest on their own. Those pics obviously didn't sell well, though (given how few we saw in magazines), so the interest diminished. Follow the money, as ever! :) At least that seems entirely likely to me.
No, I don't think they stay inside all the time in NY or that they did in Paris (I mean, obviously they didn't stay inside the whole time in Paris since they were sighted). I guess I just don't understand what the disconnect or weirdness is between them being photographed because of a tip vs them otherwise not being photographed much at all. In fact, doesn't that actually make sense, i.e., that, without a tip, they don't draw much pap interest? I think if you combine that with him/them possibly not going out as much, you get a mostly "undocumented" relationship. If they wanted it to be more documented, they could hit more hot spots (like Pastis and Waverly Inn). Kiefer certainly knows where to be photographed in LA. So, to me, the fact that they weren't photographed in any of those spots during the month or so (apparently) she was there last summer points to the distinct possibility that, while he/she/they aren't adverse to a tipped photo op if it's deemed valuable to his publicity, they don't - on their own - court it.
I agree with you Christy, they are just a normal couple who tries to live their life and to spend their free times together as much as possible.
And i feel Kiefer has changed, i think he really loves her. (lucky girl!!!)
She lives with him and he took her for a romantic trip in Paris !!!!
Christy,
You just saved me a whole lot of writing the same thing. Imo he was of much more interest immediately following his release from jail. The paps were hoping to get something, especially since he left them high and dry leaving the facility through the back door that night.
I also think he's had an interesting relationship with the paps and the professional autograph seekers over the years since 24 has been on. And there has been a level of professional courtesy given him in return for him giving some of his time. That changed a little right after the DUI and for a little bit of time after being released in January. And has since started to thaw and he's back to signing again.
But I think he definitely eased back into that since January much like he's eased back into being photographed and interviewed. There was a very long time that he didn't really talk to anybody in the media. Since the Letterman coming out he's been more open about things --- though it really seems like it is a line of questioning he and his publicity is trying to steer the media away from.
LOL!! Seems I wrote a ton anyway ;D
But, yeah, ITA with your take in your 12:12PM and 2:02PM posts :)
D2
And the photos from last night at the Buffalo Club *THUD* If anyone is bored with seeing him look THAT good - well I don't know what to say to that.
Heee - so wanted to help him out with his zipper :D
Oh my lordy lord, I *SO* agree, D2!
RIDICULOUSLY gorgeous!!!
... and, yes, please to helping him with his zipper! :D
Um. don't you think that maybe he could have let something pop out of that unzipped zipper for us. I mean he does "owe" his fans something. lol
Pam
That would have been a nice 'gift' to his fans. :D
Thanks so much Linda for agreeing about Kiefer being so close to real, prior to his DUI in 07. Pam & Anony thanks. I'm just very disappointed in him for so many pics that were PR related in 08. It was a setup which is not hard to see but something Kiefer went along with.
Its not his love life Christy but its the way they are projecting their relationship to the general public as I stated before. For a example in Hello! Magazine; "Carving out a New *Healthy* life with girlfriend" or "Once reowned for his hard partying lifestyle Kiefer shopping in NY with daughter (pics done by Hello!Mag). This is what they are selling to the general public but to his fans, we know its a lie and false info. The loyal fans "see" him and her sitting in bars together drinking and we "see" them walking the streets both smoking. Is this what they call a healthy life style. Does Hello!Mag know that a few days after that photo was taken of them in San Diego that Kiefer was at a bar getting drunk! Did his PRs call the mag and say, No you got it wrong..It's a Hopeful life since Kiefer is still drinking". He is very much aware of what a fake the story is but he went along with it which makes him as false/fake as this story. I'm disappointed that he isn't manly enough to stand up to it. It just shows how immature he is to go along with the lies that his people are projecting of him to the general public and not caring whether his loyal fans see this as a lie. Kalin
Oh btw...it was his loyal fans who voted over and over again to get him the title...Sexist Man Of 2008...not the general public! Kalin
Christy, we interpreted the quote by Kiefer about negative posts the same way. I understood it perfectly which is why I made the analogy that I did.
You're welcome, Kalin!!
It was his loyal fans who followed him when he was promoting Rocco and who bought the DVD "ITYTKM" or Rocco's CD not the general public who really had no clue who Rocco was. We are the ones who watched The Letterman Show etc: when Rocco came on and listen to the radio stations when Rocco/Kiefer were on. We are the ones voting for Rocco and HoneyHoney not the general public. I'm not sure whether I will ever believe anything that comes out of his mouth again. If he doesn't like reading post or comments maybe he should read my comments and feel how hurtful his fakeness/lies can hurt fans especially this one. Kalin
Linda...
Poor Baby! He doesn't want to read my negative post. Kalin
Kalin, very good point about the Ironworks music in relation to the popularity with Kiefer and his loyal fanbase, not the average person away from this fanbase. It was the people most loyal to Kiefer that made sure to help him get this band and now the others on the map. I think people are fooling themselves if they think Rocco, HoneyHoney or any other Kiefer related band makes it on their own without Kiefer regardless of their talent. He used his name which is as it was advertised but that caught the eye of his fanbase.
And Christy, sorry to but we have to disagree yet again, it is not ok if a small number of his loyal fans are unhappy with him. Again, loyal fans are the ones who stick with the star through thick and thin and pull him through the hard times, if necessary and keep him on top when the good times roll in. That is what is happening with Kiefer now. Yes, he has a good general public support system but the loyal fanbase is pulling him to even loftier hights and the loyal fanbase will be there for him when this big wave ends. P.S. and being upset about a star being a fake, if that is the case or how he combs his hair that day are completely different things.
Can I ask how long you (Kalin, Linda, Anon, others) have been fans? I started following his work in 2001 with the start of 24. As such, I've seen him grow older and wiser over the years and become accustomed to life as a uber TV celebrity - YET still maintain a down to earth persona and kind soul.
His passion for music and breaking these bands is something that I admire. And I also admire the manner in which he handled the DUI situation, the jail time and how he appears to be trying to modify his life to be more grown up and responsible while still being himself.
Others may see this as fake but I see it as someone that went through what was probably a pretty traumatic time and has grown stronger and more confident in the process. He's not going to be perfect but it's nice that he appears to have beaten back some of his demons.
I only wish him well.
Some people think Kiefer is fake because they are jealous of Siobhan. I'm sure if he was not with her, we would not talk about that.
According to me, the pics was not staged, they live in NY and so, in Manhattan, many stars are pictured out and about there. (go and see Wenn photo library).
In Paris, we have only sightings and Kiefer has not the same popularity in France, media are not so interested by him. So, he can walk on the streets with her and i think he knows that, what i mean is that he seems to avoid paparazzis when he's with her but it doesn't work anytime.
And i agree with you D2, he said he has learned from his past mistakes and now, i think he is changing and he has changed for a new life. The fact that his girlfriend he's not with him at red carpets makes me think to Michael Weatherly (he 's gonna to marry) whose girlfriend has never been with him at the red carpets, because she does not want to be pictured and he has always respected that.
LOL - imaging Siobhan doesn't want to be pictured!!!
Siobhan NOT wanting to be pictured!! LOL!! Doubt that is very likely..
But, I still agree they are together. Kiefer said NY is the greatest place in the world to him.Mnn, to do with a certain lady perhaps?
yes, when he said that, i thought he talked about Siobhan, i would not be surprised to hear one day they get married because to see him all around the world with her (i don't know if he did the same things with Catherine or Kelly...) and the fact he lives with her shows how much he cares for her.
As for this girl, even if i don't like her, she is the most lucky girl in he world.
All the talk aborve about how Kiefer handled his DUI so well, I am a fan but If he was such a wonerful person, then whyin the hell was this his 4h DUI, you guys act like he is a saint for sucking it up and going to jail, he should have gotten a harder sentence and in my opinion he shouldn't be driving, 4 srikes and you are out. Of yes I orgot how the courty system works here, he pleaded down the first 2 and wasn't convicted of DUI, but SO WHAT he still did it, and you guys think he should be rewarded what a crock of crap.
I've been looking over this site for a while,and other's! I just want to wade in abit and write a few thoughts.
I don't know this lady and so I won't judge her but she is a beautiful woman and I don't believe Kiefer would spend time with her if she wasn't a nice person.I think,and I'm not singling anyone out here,but some fans need to grow up.The opera singer Katharine Jenkins-quite popular in England,don't know about America,but she has been seeing a man for a year. Everytime there are photographers around they both behave distant toward eachother.They just don't want the interference.I bet Siobhan is having a great laugh at some fans.She has been with Kiefer for a year and only they know what's going on.I read on some sites there are girls commenting on this relationship but they haven't had a relationship themselves!Is it me or is that alittle pathetic?(in that they dare comment about things they have no idea of?)
Sorry to offend, but this is nuts.
Kiefer and Siobhan should be left alone to get on with life.
Now you can watch a video clip of Kiefer leaving the Buffalo Club Party (where the embarrasing pics with his unzipped zipper - which some "fans" here think are "sooo gorgeous") at Dazia's and you can see clearly Kiefer was completely drunk - again! Guess that shows what a happy life Kiefer has and what a wonderful influence Siobhan has!
Yes, 6:11, K and S should be left alone to get on with life. I think they do, they don't need our approval LOL.(fortunately)
7:38, are you sure Kiefer was drunk at that party ? hum...
I have just two questions for Christy or Linda because i'm interested by your point of views : do you think Kiefer will marry her ? (knowing you are not medium) and if he does, do you see him as a father again ? i ask you because you are fans of K for a long time now.
Thanks for you answer girls.
I wish everyone here an happy new year .
I'm rushing this morning, so quickly...
." But... they're young. ;) I guess. :)
7:38 - completely drunk? Sorry to (apparently) disappoint you but, no, he's not.
Kalin - it sounds to me like you just plain ol' dislike the guy now, which certainly is your right. At what point, then, are you planning to move on to following someone or something that gives you pleasure instead of making you angry all the time? Just curious.
Janie - I do think that it's kinda funny when I read posts from people saying, "I haven't had a relationship yet, but I know that if I *did* have one it would go
Isabelle - I think that's a really good question. Just my take, but... I think he's going to enter into marriage again very very cautiously, if at all, but I don't think it's an impossibility. I also don't think it's an impossibility that he'll have another child (or more). When he was working with Michael Douglas, it was fairly clear, I thought, that he admired the way that Michael has entered into a different phase in his life, including having a new family. Will he do it? I dunno. Is it a possbility? I think so. Whatever he does, I only wish him - and whomever he has in his life - well. :D
5:25AM I'm not an apologist for Kiefer's drinking nor have I ever thought of him as a saint. And while I wish he would have not only learned his lesson about drinking and driving after the first time he got caught and that he'd realize he has a drinking problem -- he sadly didn't and hasn't.
That does not negate how he handled the latest. He has a disease imo and until he acknowledges that he's not going to be able to stop drinking. What he can do is make sure he's not in a position to drive. And Siobhan's presence isn't going to change the pull that drinking has for him. His own father being at the event that night didn't change his behavior either. He's the only one that can make that decision and he has to do that for himself. And hopefully one day soon he will
I also knew by the look on his face in the early photos that he had been drinking and likely to excess that night. And nevertheless, to me, he's still rockin' looking in those stills. Sue me. LOL!!
Am I a little embarrassed for him because of the zipper - sure - but I look at it as one more thing that may cause him to see himself differently when he drinks and maybe at some point all these things will add up enough for him to want to stop. It's getting to be a pretty long list LOL and it hasn't stopped him yet so to tell you the truth I'm not holding my breath for that day. But I do hope he will eventually come to that conclusion.
There is all this talk about fakeness... well like it or not those photos are part of the authentic Kiefer and will remain to be until the day he's honest with his drinking problem and deals with it.
D2, do you really think he's drunk at the Buffalo Club party? I genuinely don't. (Not that that changes the fact that I'm as certain as a person possibly can be from the outside that he has a severe drinking problem. :))
Christy,
No I don't think he was completely drunk but definitely feeling good. :)
He just get's this look on his face as shown in some of the stills when he has been drinking more than a couple and he was easily being led around in the video that sealed the deal for me. When he hasn't been drinking he has a much more purposeful walk and focused expression which I didn't see evidence of in the pics/video.
I of course could be wrong -- but I do think he was on his way to being drunk that night - but didn't quite get there before he decided to leave.
Happily he had his trusty driver there. :)
BTW, Have fun!!
D2 I knew about Kiefer..like forever but really didn't become a loyal fan until the start of 24. The internet wasn't as active back then with K sites as it is now which occured in 07. There was only KieferRocks and a few others. I read everything Kiefer from back then and continue to do so. I bought every thing Kiefer. There are more Kiefers sites and it is strange but alot of these sites occured just before Kiefer went to jail.Our thread D2 wasn't about Kiefer life *prior* to his DUI and jail time because as you, I also admired Kiefer and his work. So I agree with you there!I'm having a problem *after* his jail time so I hate to repeat myself just read my post over and you might understand about my disappointment in Kiefer.
I'm sorry I can't agree with people who believe Kiefer has changed since his jail time. I have seen/hear the same pattern as before with his other women and the same thing in his personal life style. The only thing which has changed is he add a new address which he is speaking about more. Kiefer is a person who was raised in the city, he loves the city night life and what it has to offer. Before it was Toronto and LA. Toronto is so much like NYC but NY is larger. Toronto is truely a great entertaining envirorment but his mother lives there. I'm sure his wild behavior was embarrassing for her, like the time at Trattoria Vatticano Restaurant with the flowers in jeans. BTW..their Tomato Sauce on Pasta is the best in all of Toronto if you ever go, the place is in Yorkville. When I went I mentioned Kiefer and the owner gave us free dessert. What a thrill! Kalin
Hey! Just one of those 'seeing it slightly differently' things because, while I wouldn't be surprised if he'd had a drink or two (and who knows what the rest of the night held! ;)), I didn't think he had his Kiefer'sDrinkingFace on in the stills and felt even more that way after watching the video.
I know what you mean about being led around, but pretty much everyone was being led around in that scrum - mostly because they couldn't see from the flashes, I think! - and he ended up having to be led out and then back in because it wasn't his car that pulled up the first time. When the guy was asking him if that was his car, he seemed really lucid in saying, "no, that's not it." He seemed pretty focused to me, under the crazy circumstances. So, who knows?! Boy, did he look purty one way or another, huh?!
All of that said, meant to add earlier that, whatever the deal with those photos, I agree completely with your post at 9:15.
... and thanks! Waiting for the cab to the airport now... :D
I agree with you Kalin... i don't think he has changed, i just believe he is more discreet and careful about his drinking habits
And so, even if it's serious with Siobhan, don't think she has changed him, he was already with her in 2007, before the DUI arrest.
Kalin,
I get that you are having a problem with the post jail time PR.
It's just imo he's been doing the right things to get the DUI and jail time questions behind him. He needs to look at his career and marketability with and beyond 24 and to do that he has to put out an image of himself moving on in a positive light.
Just as he quietly took care of the previous DUI because it could have damaged his position with FOX and future work then he didn't have that same opportunity with the most recent one. As most people who have to deal with DUI's aren't marked with a scarlet letter and paraded through the tabloids like celebrities are. It just goes with the territory. The intensity and potential for added negative exposure was also heightened because of the Britney, Lohan and Paris press that was filling TMZ and other tabloids at the time. Plus there was the non-flattering video from that evening.
So he had a really big PR problem on his hands and thus a more involved PR job that needed to be considered and undertaken.
He laid low prior to the Jail time and also for some time following his release. While issuing a statement and allowing others to talk about him and how he was doing for him. Then post jail in the spring - the PR really started in part imo to attempt to shift the inevitable conversation to come once he started the talk show circuti to promote his projects away from jail and toward the future. And part of that reintroduction to the media involved being photographed with Siobhan doing normal things. I don't think their relationship (in whatever capacity that is) as fake therefore I don't see the images of them, even in tipped photo ops, as fake.
I know that you find his answers or lack there of about this relationship to be disingenuous if I read your posts correctly. But I don't. I see it as someone in the public eye offering a glimpse into his private life without wanting to get into the details by commenting on it and otherwise avoiding questions about it. I think this protects them both and I can't fault him for wanting it both ways.
Who of us wants people delving into our every private moment or thoughts? We save that to be shared with our family and friends - and sometimes not even them LOL!! If there is something special between them I'm sure to some extent his family and friends are in the know. The rest of us don't have a right to that info no matter how much we may be interested in it. But everyone's mileage may vary on this point. :)
What I have more difficulty with is why there is so much anger involved with something that should have been fully expected knowing the entertainment industry. He's been a part of this industry for a very long time and he's remained and remains genuine despite the 20+ years of PR that he's been a part of. There isn't anything he's doing now that he hasn't done in the past - or at least post Julia.
So I guess it seems that those that see him as being fake now should have also thought he was fake back then. That's the part that doesn't quite make sense to me.
I personally think he's been genuine and more humble, honest and down to earth in his life than 99% of the in the spotlight celebrities out there. And for that I think he deserves some respect for his general honesty and openess from fans. And I think on the whole he does have that.
Continued...
I don't think their relationship (in whatever capacity that is) as fake therefore I don't see the images of them, even in tipped photo ops, as fake.
I know that you find his answers or lack there of about this relationship to be disingenuous if I read your posts correctly. But I don't. I see it as someone in the public eye offering a glimpse into his private life without wanting to get into the details by commenting on it and otherwise avoiding questions about it. I think this protects them both and I can't fault him for wanting it both ways.
Who of us wants people delving into our every private moment or thoughts? We save that to be shared with our family and friends - and sometimes not even them LOL!! If there is something special between them I'm sure to some extent his family and friends are in the know. The rest of us don't have a right to that info no matter how much we may be interested in it. But everyone's mileage may vary on this point. :)
What I have more difficulty with is why there is so much anger involved with something that should have been fully expected knowing the entertainment industry. He's been a part of this industry for a very long time and he's remained and remains genuine despite the 20+ years of PR that he's been a part of. There isn't anything he's doing now that he hasn't done in the past - or at least post Julia.
So I guess it seems that those that see him as being fake now should have also thought he was fake back then. That's the part that doesn't quite make sense to me.
I personally think he's been genuine and more humble, honest and down to earth in his life than 99% of the in the spotlight celebrities out there. And for that I think he deserves some respect for his general honesty and openess from fans. And I think on the whole he does have that.
For me at least I believe that because his behaviour has been different with Siobhan that it's more serious with her than we know.
Whilst who knows everything the future holds,nobody, but he could get married again and become a father again.If it's serious with Siobhan let us not forget she is getting older and has no children so there is a possibility that she wants them,IMO.And if he loves her he will give her what she wants.
Although I didn't mean to be abusive to anybody earlier,I do feel some of his younger fans live in a bubble when it comes to Kiefer.If he does get married and have children with her I will be interested to see how they will react and just pray nobody gets hurt! lol!
And as we saw he said New York is the best place in the world to him.Funny how he says that and spends more time there when siobhan lives there?I really think we all have our answer on this but I know some just won't believe it.Kiefer has some spiteful little girls as fans,hopefuly they will grow up and just be happy for him.
:)
Janie, i agree with you some fans and i don't really know how old they are, still thinks she's not with him or if he is with her but not serious...I don't know if he will get married or will have children but it sounds strange to me he never had childs with Kelly whereas in the past, he told she was the woman of his dreams...Now, if they do, i'm happy for them.
Everybody needs love and even our Kiefer. Don't know Siobhan, but if she wants one or more babies, it's time for her. And as you said if Kiefer loves her he will give her what she expects.
To add to my post I'm gunna swim against the tide here and suggest something which I'm fairly sure hasn't been discussed before-sorry if it has-But the "coming out" on april 1st: Well, what if that was more for her than him?Think about it,she was married for sure up until june 07 as far as we know.Now, if siobhan got with Kiefer before or during her marrige we will never know but could it be that the pics on the ist were more for her ex's benefit and maybe her friends and family?She will not have wanted to flaunt Kiefer in her exes face,he is a powerful guy and kiefer is a celebrity,I'm sure she will have had to move the dynamics in a gentle way.But she will know as will kiefer that they would have to be seen together at some time.So they go to lunch at a celeb hangout and introduce things slowly.I'm sure it will have helped Kiefer in some way but I don't believe it was for the benefit of him entirely (or been the brainchild of a fox exec although i know it happens) I really don't. I'm sure Kiefer would want to be respectful toward her ex too becasue he has already had his fair share of bad press so I can't see him having a problem with them doing it that way.Maybe they are not "touchy feely" in public because she doesn't want the pictures all over the internet for her family and friends to see and her EX.Personally I think she has class. Sorry, shoot me down if you want too but that is my take everyone.
Of course she has class and she's beautiful, but she left (and i'm sure of that) David for Kiefer, i think they have waited her divorce to show them together (the pics from august 2007 doesn't show any PDA except when she put her hands in Kiefer's hair and he seemed embarrassed).
But if she has class i'm sure David knew she was dating Kiefer before us ...
Yes 1.34 I'm sure he did.My point was tht Kiefer & Siobhan were inevitably going to be photographed togther some time so surely it's better to be controlled by them i.e at Waverly and Pasti's.
Not saying I'm right, but I think it's an option,far more so than these ludicrous "conspiricy theories".
To add too why we don't see them at red carpet events, maybe she just doesn't want the attention?
She has a career in her own right and I'm sure when they get time togther it's precious and want to spend it building a relationship out of the spotlight which we know can be damaging.She has been around too long now for it not to be serious. If Kiefer didn't want to be asked about his lovelife I'm sure his PA will have announced this prior to interviews and I bet a zillion bucks that Kiefer spent Christmas with her.She is beautiful I have seen her in the flesh and I'm sure some girls are just driven to the extremes of jealousy because of this and also because they know deep down that this relationship is a serious one.
JMO :)
Looks to me we all have are "Conspiracy Theories". If she didn't want to be in all those photo why did she do it? I suppose you think she is classy when she sits down on the busy sidewalk of NYC to have a smoke! Is she also classy when she sits in a bar with Kiefer which gets him into trouble. Whats your theory as to why she wasn't at the Walk of Fame if she wanted to get back at her ex? Why was she excluded from the Walk of Fame if they are so much in love? Do you believe that was a personal and rewarding event for Kiefer and she should have been there with him?
Do you think Kiefer should get in control of his drinking problem before he marries her or have any babies. Can you imagine Kiefer coming home drunk trying to change a babies diaper. Would you allow him to handle a baby drunk? Do you really believe Kiefer has no sense at all?
I believe Kiefer said, "He had 2 failed marriages and the Biggest disappointment in himself was his failure as a father". He said that because he has a bad drinking problem and is probably a alcoholic. Did you just see the photos of him at the Buffalo Club drinking? Do you still believe Kiefer is ready to marry and be a daddy again? Do you agree he should at the very least be able to stay off the bottle longer then 48 days? Maybe a year? What about a day at a time! He hasn't had anymore child in 20 yrs because he knows he has a problem. Give the guy some credit!!! Hello
Hello I agree...The only reason Kiefer spends time with her is because she smokes, drinks and she likes to party.
Kiefer can't even keep his own zipper up let alone change a diaper!
Don't you think if they decided to go that route something would have to give?? I believe Kiefer would give in and say...BYE! BYE! Hello right back...
That's kind of cynical and really disrespectful don't you think? It would be nice if there could be a little more respect and decorum shown while providing an opinion. There is really no reason to be that ugly 3:30PM.
And karma is a bitch... just sayin'
Just for fun here's a new theory. Maybe Sib is dating Kiefer to get back at her Daddy. After all her father's a well respected therapist in the field of addiction. What better way to stick it to a father like that than by taking up with a famous bad boy like Kiefer who has a well documented history involving alcohol.
Spiteful little girls and ugly D2...It would be nice if there could be a little more respect and decorun shown while providing an opinion. Grow up yourself.
5:41PM...There you go! We finally have the right answer! Thanks so much.
I wonder if he took her to the Golden Globes with him? What will every ones answer be if he doesn't. She had to work on a Sunday night or she was sick. I wonder what theory they will provide this time.
Did I tell you to grow up Anon? No, but it definitely wouldn't hurt. *rolls eyes* As for your ugly comments earlier they were and still are over the line. If you can't see that then I feel sorry for you.
D2 I'm in agReement with you,there is no need whatsoever to be that maloevent.All the anonymous postings-you must be the spiteful little girls I was talking about...
I think you have read my post wrong.I didn't suggest that Siobhan is with Kiefer to get at her ex, but that she fell in love with him but also knew she had to handle her ex in the right way. I don't know why she wasn't at the walk of fame,there could be a zillion reasons.The pictures she has been appearing in have all been taken when she has been spending personal time with Kiefer.If she was fame hungry wed've seen her acting up for all the press at the awards but we haven't.Like it or not she is in his life and I hardly think that she is holding a gun to his head forcing him to do it. Something is keeping him in NY and really doubt it is sarah alone although people would love to think that.sarah is 21 she has her own life.And yes I hope he sorts his drinking out, settles down with a woman and if he wants more kids has them.
So much anger in your hearts is not healthy and it will be only you who suffers in the end.Janie
D2 I'm in agReement with you,there is no need whatsoever to be that maloevent.All the anonymous postings-you must be the spiteful little girls I was talking about...
I think you have read my post wrong.I didn't suggest that Siobhan is with Kiefer to get at her ex, but that she fell in love with him but also knew she had to handle her ex in the right way. I don't know why she wasn't at the walk of fame,there could be a zillion reasons.The pictures she has been appearing in have all been taken when she has been spending personal time with Kiefer.If she was fame hungry wed've seen her acting up for all the press at the awards but we haven't.Like it or not she is in his life and I hardly think that she is holding a gun to his head forcing him to do it. Something is keeping him in NY and really doubt it is sarah alone although people would love to think that.sarah is 21 she has her own life.And yes I hope he sorts his drinking out, settles down with a woman and if he wants more kids has them.
So much anger in your hearts is not healthy and it will be only you who suffers in the end.Janie
Maybe she is not in any pictures at public events because he doesn't want her to be. I have no idea what there real situation is, but I don't believe for one minute that she chose this course of keeping their relationship private. She's doing whatever he wants because she wants him and is willing to wait it out.