Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement x17 France
Advertisement
Advertisement

« Jackson Rehearsal Footage May Shed Some Light On His State Of Health | Main | Rihanna Switches Up Her Style »

New Report: Neither Jackson Nor Rowe Are Biological Parents Of Michael's Three Kids

Posted on Tue Jun 30, 2009 08:00 AM PDT

michaeljacksonbiologicalpar.jpg

A new report claims that not only is Michael Jackson not the biological father of Prince Michael, Paris and Prince Michael II, but neither is the woman who delivered the two eldest, Debbie Rowe.

TMZ says "multiple sources" tell them that a sperm donor was used to fertilize donor eggs and that Debbie was just the surrogate.

Us claims that the sperm donor was none other than Michael's dermatologist (and Debbie's boss), Dr. Arnold Klein. But if Debbie truly was just a surrogate and not the biological mother, it's unclear if the identity of the biological mother is known.

As for "Blanket", the surrogate apparently didn't know whom she was hired by and her identity still remains a mystery.

Apparently there are documents in existence that detail the arrangements of the three births.

Even if it turns out that Debbie Rowe isn't their biological mother, she would still most likely have a claim in court for custody of Prince Michael and Paris because she was still their "birth mother."

It still remains to be seen if she'll challenge Katherine Jackson for custody.



This just keeps getting weirder and weirder!

Comments (0)

Comments



 

 


Note: Your comment will post in 5 minutes. Practice patience and don't double your efforts. Thank you.

Advertisement
Kim Kardashian Struts Her Stuff!
Selena Gomez In Rio De Janeiro
Advertisement
Daryl Hannah Lists Malibu Hideaway For $4.9 Million
We Want Your Tips
Advertisement
Advertisement
Latest Celebrity Tweets
Advertisement
Celebrity Street Style
Advertisement
Like us on Facebook!
Advertisement
X17 on Twitter
X17 Poll

Are you hoping Britney Spears guest stars on Modern Family?

Yes! She has a funny personality and would fit in perfectly on the ABC comedy.
No! She would be horrific on the show and would tarnish its reputation.
Don't know! But it would be a great way for the show to get even bigger ratings.
  • Vote
  • View Results
Advertisement
Do You Prefer The Reality Star Without Or With Makeup?
Without With
VOTEVIEW RESULTS
Advertisement
X17 Exclusives
Advertisement